-
International Journal of Environmental... Mar 2023(1) Objective: The aim of this study is to synthesize the effects of physical therapy on pain, frequency, or duration management in the short, medium, and long term in... (Review)
Review
(1) Objective: The aim of this study is to synthesize the effects of physical therapy on pain, frequency, or duration management in the short, medium, and long term in adult patients diagnosed with Tension-type headache (TTH). (2) Background: Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common headache with migraine and its pathophysiology and treatment has been discussed for years without reaching a consensus. (3) Methods: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020175020). The systematic search for clinical trials was performed in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Scopus, SciELO and Dialnet. Articles were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, regarding the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions on adult patients with TTH published in the last 11 years with a score ≥ 6 in the PEDro Scale (Physiotherapy Evidence Database). (4) Results: In total, 120 articles were identified, of which 15 randomized controlled trials were finally included in order to determine the inclusion criteria. Changes in pain intensity, headache frequency or headache duration of individual studies were described (5) Conclusions: This systematic review shows that there is no standardized physical therapy protocol for the approach to tension headache, although all the techniques studied to date address in one way or another the cranio-cervical-mandibular region. The approach to the cranio-cervical-mandibular region reports significant effects in terms of decreasing the intensity of pain and frequency of headache episodes in the short and medium term. More long-term longitudinal studies are needed.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Tension-Type Headache; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Headache; Physical Therapy Modalities; Pain
PubMed: 36901475
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20054466 -
Cephalalgia : An International Journal... Mar 2023A systematic and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the evidence of the effects of botulinum toxin A on chronic tension-type headache. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A systematic and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the evidence of the effects of botulinum toxin A on chronic tension-type headache.
METHODS
Cochrane, Embase, Ovid, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Web-of-Science databases, and ClinicallTrials.gov registry were systematically searched for studies examining the effects of botulinum toxin A on tension-type headaches. The records were screened by two independent reviewers using pre-determined eligibility criteria. DerSimonian Liard random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the 'meta' package (5.2-0) in R (4.2.0). Risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Tool RoB 2 and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Clinical significance was determined using pre-defined minimal clinically important differences.
RESULTS
Eleven controlled trials were included (390 botulinum toxin A, 297 controls). Botulinum toxin A was associated with significant improvements in standardized headache intensity (-0.502 standard deviations [-0.945, -0.058]), headache frequency (-2.830 days/month [-4.082, -1.578]), daily headache duration (-0.965 [-1.860, -0.069]) and the frequency of acute pain medication use (-2.200 days/month [-3.485, -0.915]) vs controls. Botulinum toxin A-associated improvements exceeded minimal clinically important differences for headache intensity, frequency, and acute pain medication use. A 79% (28%, 150%) greater response rate was observed for botulinum toxin A vs controls in improving chronic tension-type headache. Treatment of eight chronic tension-type headache patients was sufficient to elicit a therapeutic response in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS
Corroborating the current mechanistic evidence, our meta-analysis supports the utility of botulinum toxin A for managing chronic tension-type headaches. However, due to limitations in the quality of evidence, adequately-powered high-quality controlled trials examining the effects of Botulinum toxin A on chronic tension-type headache are warranted.
REGISTRATION
Protocol preregistered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020178616).
Topics: Humans; Tension-Type Headache; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Acute Pain; Headache; Headache Disorders
PubMed: 36786349
DOI: 10.1177/03331024221150231 -
The Journal of Headache and Pain Feb 2023Headache is the most prevalent neurological manifestation in adults and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. In children and adolescents, headaches are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Headache is the most prevalent neurological manifestation in adults and one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. In children and adolescents, headaches are arguably responsible for a remarkable impact on physical and psychological issues, yet high-quality evidence is scarce.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We searched cross-sectional and cohort studies in Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases from January 1988 to June 2022 to identify the prevalence of headaches in 8-18 years old individuals. The risk of bias was examined with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scale. A random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of pediatric headache. Subgroup analyses based on headache subtypes were also conducted.
RESULTS
Out of 5,486 papers retrieved electronically, we identified 48 studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of primary headaches was 11% for migraine overall [95%CI: 9-14%], 8% for migraine without aura (MwoA) [95%CI: 5-12%], 3% for migraine with aura (MwA) [95%CI:2-4%] and 17% for tension-type headache (TTH) [95% CI: 12-23%]. The pooled prevalence of overall primary headache in children and adolescents was 62% [95% CI: 53-70%], with prevalence in females and males of 38% [95% CI: 16-66%] and 27% [95% CI: 11-53%] respectively. After the removal of studies ranked as low-quality according to the JBI scale, prevalence rates were not substantially different. Epidemiological data on less common primary headaches, such as trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, were lacking.
CONCLUSION
We found an overall remarkably high prevalence of primary headaches in children and adolescents, even if flawed by a high degree of heterogeneity. Further up-to-date studies are warranted to complete the picture of pediatric headache-related burden to enhance specific public interventions.
Topics: Male; Adult; Female; Humans; Child; Adolescent; Cross-Sectional Studies; Headache; Tension-Type Headache; Migraine with Aura; Migraine without Aura; Prevalence
PubMed: 36782182
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01541-0 -
Cephalalgia : An International Journal... Jan 2023In this manuscript, we aim to systematically estimate the pooled prevalence and incidence of primary headaches and its subtypes (migraine, tension-type headache, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In this manuscript, we aim to systematically estimate the pooled prevalence and incidence of primary headaches and its subtypes (migraine, tension-type headache, and chronic headaches) in Latin America and the Caribbean, describing its epidemiological profile and associated factors.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and LILACS (From conception to March 2021), for populational studies reporting the epidemiology of primary headaches and their associated factors in Latin America and the Caribbean. The data extraction was conducted independently. We performed random-effect model meta-analysis of prevalence (overall primary headaches and by subtypes) and associated factors, assessed potential sources of heterogeneity, the risk of bias, publication bias, and the evidence certainty (GRADE methodology).
RESULTS
We included 32 populational studies (38 subpopulations, n = 63,813). The prevalence of primary headaches was 41.4% (95% CI 31.1-52.2%; n = 54,357), 15% for migraine (95% CI 12.0-18.3; n = 53,658 individuals), 20.6% for tension-type headache (95% CI 12.4-30.2; n = 25,840), and 6% for chronic headaches (95% CI 3.3-9.6; n = 21,720), with high between-study heterogeneity. No incidence data was found. Female sex, white ethnicity, high BMI, comorbid mental health disorders, and low-back pain were associated with higher prevalence of primary headaches. The prevalence was less in rural areas.
CONCLUSION
In Latin America and the Caribbean, primary headaches are highly prevalent affecting young females disproportionally. The prevalence of chronic headaches is higher than in other systematic global and regional estimations. The presence of comorbidities as modifiable risk factors should encourage their integration as targets for community-based preventive and therapeutic interventions.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42018105116.
Topics: Humans; Female; Tension-Type Headache; Latin America; Ethnicity; Headache; Migraine Disorders; Caribbean Region; Prevalence
PubMed: 36606574
DOI: 10.1177/03331024221128265 -
International Journal of Nursing Studies Feb 2023Dementia is an urgent public health problem worldwide, and the determination of the contribution of pain to cognitive decline or dementia is significant for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Dementia is an urgent public health problem worldwide, and the determination of the contribution of pain to cognitive decline or dementia is significant for the prevention of dementia.
OBJECTIVE
To comprehensively explore the contribution of pain to subsequent cognitive decline or dementia and analyze possible influencing factors.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
METHODS
We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet, WANFANG DATA and VIP for cohort studies from database inception to January 21, 2022. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of incident cognitive decline or dementia among patients with pain. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to explore the sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 35 cohort studies containing 1,122,503 participants were included. As a whole, pain (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 1.17-1.31) was a risk factor for subsequent cognitive decline or dementia; headache, migraine, tension-type headache, widespread pain, and irritable bowel syndrome, but not burning mouth syndrome, were also risk factors. Pain increased the risk of all-cause dementia (OR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.18-1.35), Alzheimer's disease (OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.12-1.47), and vascular dementia (OR = 1.31; 95% CI = 1.06-1.62). Pain interference (OR = 1.42; 95% CI = 1.16-1.74) was associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline or dementia, while pain intensity was not. Pooled results from studies with sample sizes less than 2000 or with relatively low quality showed that pain did not increase the risk of cognitive decline or dementia. There was no statistically significant increase in the risk of cognitive decline or dementia in people with pain aged ≥75 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results demonstrated that pain increased the risk of subsequent cognitive decline or dementia. Sample size, study methodological quality, types of pain, pain severity (pain interference), and age composition of the study population may affect the relationship between pain and cognitive decline or dementia.
REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42022316406).
Topics: Humans; Cognitive Dysfunction; Alzheimer Disease; Cohort Studies; Risk Factors; Pain
PubMed: 36527860
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104409 -
Neuromodulation : Journal of the... Oct 2023Chronic headache remains a major cause of disability and pain worldwide. Although the literature has extensively described pharmacologic options for headache treatment... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Chronic headache remains a major cause of disability and pain worldwide. Although the literature has extensively described pharmacologic options for headache treatment and prophylaxis, there remains a paucity of data on the efficacy of neuromodulation interventions for treatment of headache unresponsive to conventional pharmacologic therapy. The primary aim of this review was to appraise the literature for the efficacy of cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) in treating any intractable chronic headache, including migraine headaches (with or without aura), cluster headache, tension headache, and other types of headaches.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we performed a systematic review by identifying studies in PubMed, Embase (Scopus), Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials that assessed cSCS to treat chronic headache. Data were synthesized qualitatively, with primary outcomes of headache intensity and frequency. The secondary outcome was adverse effects.
RESULTS
In total, 16 studies comprising 107 patients met the inclusion criteria. Findings were presented based on type of headache, which included migraine headache with or without aura, cluster headache, trigeminal neuropathy, occipital neuralgia, posttraumatic headache, cervicogenic headache, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with autonomic symptoms, and poststroke facial pain. Per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria, there was very low-quality evidence that cSCS is associated with a decrease in migraine headache frequency, migraine headache intensity, and trigeminal neuropathy intensity. Placement for cSCS leads ranged from C1 to C4.
CONCLUSIONS
Our review suggests promising data from observational studies that cSCS may be helpful in decreasing frequency and intensity of chronic intractable headache. Future well-powered, randomized controlled trials are needed.
Topics: Humans; Cluster Headache; Spinal Cord Stimulation; Headache; Headache Disorders; Migraine Disorders; Post-Traumatic Headache; Neuralgia; Epilepsy; Trigeminal Nerve Diseases
PubMed: 36513586
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.10.060 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Nov 2022: The relationship between migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) with Parkinson's disease (PD) is controversial, while a common pathophysiological link remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
: The relationship between migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) with Parkinson's disease (PD) is controversial, while a common pathophysiological link remains obscure. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the association between PD, migraine and TTH. : Following PRISMA, we searched MEDLINE, WebofScience, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 1 July 2022 for observational studies examining the prevalence and/or associations of PD with migraine and TTH. We pooled proportions, standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with random effects models. The risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (PROSPERO CRD42021273238). : Out of 1031 screened studies, 12 were finally included in our review (median quality score 6/9). The prevalence of any headache among PD patients was estimated at 49.1% (760 PD patients; 95% CI 24.8-73.6), migraine prevalence at 17.2% (1242 PD patients; 95% CI 9.9-25.9), while 61.5% (316 PD patients; 95% CI 52.6-70.1) of PD patients with migraine reported headache improvement after PD onset. Overall, migraine was not associated with PD (302,165 individuals; OR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.72-1.72).However, cohort studies demonstrated a positive association of PD among lifetime migraineurs (143,583 individuals; OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.28-1.84), while studies on 12-month migraine prevalence yielded an inverse association (5195 individuals; OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.97). Similar findings were reported by 3 studies with data on the TTH-PD relationship (high prevalence, positive association when examined prospectively and an inverse relationship on 12-month prevalence). These data were not quantitatively synthesized due to methodological differences among the studies. Finally, PD patients suffering from any headache had a lower motor unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) score (503 PD patients; SMD -0.39; 95% CI -0.57 to -0.21) compared to PD patients not reporting headache. There is an unclear association of headaches in genetic PD cohorts. : Observational data suggest that migraine and TTH could be linked to PD, but the current literature is conflicting.
Topics: Humans; Tension-Type Headache; Parkinson Disease; Migraine Disorders; Headache; Mental Status and Dementia Tests
PubMed: 36422223
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58111684 -
Medicine Nov 2022Headache disorders are common diseases that cause a social burden. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of various non-pharmacological... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Headache disorders are common diseases that cause a social burden. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of various non-pharmacological treatments to address or prevent acute headaches, including neuromodulation, acupuncture, and aerobic exercises in patients with episodic migraine and tension-type headache (TTH).
METHODS
We performed a systematic search of the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG MEDICINE ONLINE, and Chinese Medical Journal database using Stata/SE 14.0 to obtain weighted mean differences (WMDs). The outcomes included monthly headache days, headache intensity, headache duration, days per month of acute medication use, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey.
RESULTS
Of 872 identified articles, 27 were included in the meta-analysis. Neuromodulation was associated with reduced headache days (WMD: -1.274, 95% CI [-1.914, -0.634], P < .001), duration (WMD: -2.2, 95% CI [-3.32, -0.107], P < .001) and medication consumption (WMD: -1.808, 95% CI [-2.546, -1.071], P < .001) in cases of migraine. Acupuncture was associated with the alleviation of headache days (WMD: -0.677, 95% CI [-0.932, -0.422], P < .001) and intensity (WMD: -0.893, 95% CI [-1.573, -0.212], P = .01) in cases of migraine and acute medication use (WMD: -3.29, 95% CI [-4.86, -1.72], P < .001) in cases of TTH. Aerobic exercise was associated with reduced headache duration (WMD: -5.1, 95% CI [-8.97, -1.22], P = .01) in cases of TTH. The risk of bias for included articles was moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
There is low- and moderate-quality evidence that neuromodulation, acupuncture, and aerobic exercises are associated with attenuated headache symptoms in patients with episodic migraine or TTH. However, high-quality studies are needed to draw more detailed conclusions.
Topics: Humans; Tension-Type Headache; Migraine Disorders; Acupuncture Therapy; Headache; Exercise
PubMed: 36397322
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030530 -
Annals of Medicine Dec 2022The objective of this meta-analysis was to identify whether headache increase the risk of dry eye disease (DED). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this meta-analysis was to identify whether headache increase the risk of dry eye disease (DED).
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant studies. The odds ratio (OR) of DED in all-cause headache was calculated Stata software. To explore the source of heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted. Funnel plots and Egger's test were performed to assess publication bias.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 11 studies. Pooled analysis indicated that all-cause headache was related to a higher risk of DED (OR = 1.586, 95% CI : 1.409-1.785, = 89.3%, < .001). Migraine headache, tension headache and cluster headache were all related to a higher risk of DED (OR = 1.503, 95% CI: 1.369-1.650, = 81.8%, < .001; OR = 1.610, 95% CI: 1.585-1.635, < .001; OR = 2.120, 95% CI: 1.104-4.073, .024), respectively. The risk of DED in case-control studies was slightly higher than in cross-sectional studies and cohort study (OR = 1.707, 95% CI: 1.291-2.258, = 85.0%, < .001; OR = 1.600, 95% CI: 1.590-1.610, = 0.0%, < .001; OR = 1.440, 95% CI: 1.096-1.893, .009), respectively. Subgroup analysis in territory type showed that all-cause headache in America, Europe, Asia and Oceania were all related to a higher risk of DED.
CONCLUSIONS
This study indicates that headache is related to a higher risk of DED, especially in the migraine patients. These results suggest that headaches should be regarded as an independent risk factor for DED.KEY MESSAGESIn this meta-analysis, 11 studies (one cohort study, four case-control studies and six cross-sectional studies) covering 3,575,957 individuals were included.Pooled analysis indicated that all-cause headache was related to a higher risk of dry eye (OR = 1.586, 95% CI: 1.409-1.785, = 89.3%, < .001).These results suggest that headaches should be regarded as an independent risk factor for dry eye.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Cohort Studies; Dry Eye Syndromes; Headache; Migraine Disorders
PubMed: 36259538
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2133165 -
Pain Physician Sep 2022
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Humans; Migraine Disorders; Tension-Type Headache
PubMed: 36122271
DOI: No ID Found