-
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Dec 2020Postoperative pancreatic fistula/POPF is the most feared complication in pancreatic surgery. Although several systematic reviews investigated the impact of somatostatin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Do somatostatin-analogues have the same impact on postoperative morbidity and pancreatic fistula in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy? - A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
Postoperative pancreatic fistula/POPF is the most feared complication in pancreatic surgery. Although several systematic reviews investigated the impact of somatostatin analogues on POPF, no stratification was performed regarding type of pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy/PD; distal pancreatectomy/DP) and different somatostatin analogues.
METHODS
This study was planed according to the Preferred-Reporting-Items-for-Systematic -Review-and-Meta-Analysis/PRISMA-guidelines. After screening databases for randomized controlled trials/RCT, studies were stratified into pancreatic resection techniques and data were pooled in meta-analyses containing subgroups of octreotide, somatostatin, lanreotide, pasireotide and vapreotide.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis of studies with a mixed cohort of patients after pancreatic resection revealed a protective effect of somatostatin analogues for morbidity (RR: 0.71, p < .00001) but not for mortality (RR: 1.07, = 0.78) or intra-abdominal abscesses (RR: 1.00, p = 1.00). Moreover, no effect was visible for mortality (RR: 1.57, p = .15), morbidity (RR: 0.87, p = .15) and intra-abdominal abscesses (RR: 0.92, p = .48) after PD. The meta-analysis of patients after PD revealed no impact of somatostatin analogues on POPF (RR: 0.87, p = .19) and clinically relevant POPF (RR: 0.69, p = .30). However, treatment with somatostatin analogues in the mixed cohort showed less POPF (RR: 0.60, p < .00001) and clinically relevant POPF (RR: 0.47, p = .02), which was also the case after DP (RR: 0.41, p = .03).
CONCLUSION
Somatostatin analogues did not affect POPF and clinically relevant POPF after PD, but seemed to be associated with less POPF after DP. As no sufficiently powered RCT could be identified by the systematic review, further RCTs are urgently needed to investigate the effect of somatostatin analogues after DP.
STUDY REGISTRATION
CRD42018099808.
Topics: Anastomosis, Surgical; Humans; Morbidity; Pancreas; Pancreatectomy; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Somatostatin
PubMed: 33121847
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.10.043 -
World Journal of Surgery Jul 2019Prophylactic administration of somatostatin analogues (SA) to reduce the incidence of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains contentious. This meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Prophylactic administration of somatostatin analogues (SA) to reduce the incidence of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) remains contentious. This meta-analysis evaluated its impact on outcomes following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS
The EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating prophylactic SA following PD. Comparative effects were summarised as odds ratio and weighted mean difference based on an intention to treat. Quantitative pooling of the effect sizes was derived using the random-effects model.
MAIN RESULTS
Twelve RCTs were included involving 1615 patients [SA-treated group (n = 820) and control group (n = 795)]. The SA used included somatostatin-14, pasireotide, vapreotide and octreotide. Pooling of the data showed no significant benefit of its use for the primary outcome measure of all grades of POPF, odds ratio (OR) 0.73 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.51-1.05, p = 0.09] and clinically relevant POPF, OR 0.48 [95% CI, 0.22-1.06, p = 0.07]. There were no benefits in the secondary outcome measures of delayed gastric emptying, OR 0.98 [95% CI, 0.57-1.69, p = 0.94]; infected abdominal collections, OR 0.80 [95% CI, 0.44-1.43, p = 0.80]; reoperation rates, OR 1.24 [95% CI, 0.73-2.13, p = 0.42]; duration of hospital stay, - 0.23 [95% CI - .59 to 1.13, p = 0.74]; and mortality, 1.78 [95% CI, 0.94-3.39, p = 0.08].
CONCLUSION
SA did not improve the post-operative outcomes following PD, including reducing the incidence of POPF. The routine administration of SA cannot be recommended following PD.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Gastroparesis; Humans; Length of Stay; Octreotide; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reoperation; Somatostatin
PubMed: 30798417
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-04956-6 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2010Pancreatic resections are associated with high morbidity (30% to 60%) and mortality (5%). Synthetic analogues of somatostatin are advocated by some surgeons to reduce... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic resections are associated with high morbidity (30% to 60%) and mortality (5%). Synthetic analogues of somatostatin are advocated by some surgeons to reduce complications following pancreatic surgery, however their use is controversial.
OBJECTIVES
To determine whether prophylactic somatostatin analogues should be used routinely in pancreatic surgery.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE and Science Citation Index Expanded to November 2009.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials comparing prophylactic somatostatin or one of its analogues versus no drug or placebo during pancreatic surgery (irrespective of language or publication status).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and independently extracted data. We analysed data with both the fixed-effect and the random-effects models using Review Manager (RevMan). We calculated the risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on an intention-to-treat or available case analysis. When it was not possible to perform either of the above, we performed per protocol analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 17 trials (of high risk of bias) involving 2143 patients. The overall number of patients with postoperative complications was lower in the somatostatin analogue group (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.62 to 0.82) but there was no difference in the perioperative mortality, re-operation rate or hospital stay between the groups. The incidence of pancreatic fistula was lower in the somatostatin analogue group (RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.78). The proportion of these fistulas that were clinically significant was not mentioned in most trials. On inclusion of trials that clearly distinguished clinically significant fistulas, there was no difference between the two groups (RR 0.69; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.41). Subgroup analysis revealed a shorter hospital stay in the somatostatin analogue group than the controls for patients with malignant aetiology (MD -7.57; 95% CI -11.29 to -3.84).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Somatostatin analogues reduce perioperative complications but do not reduce perioperative mortality. In those undergoing pancreatic surgery for malignancy, they shorten hospital stay. Further adequately powered trials with low risk of bias are necessary. Based on the current available evidence, somatostatin and its analogues are recommended for routine use in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for malignancy. There is currently no evidence to support their routine use in pancreatic surgeries performed for other indications.
Topics: Humans; Octreotide; Pancreas; Pancreatic Diseases; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Somatostatin
PubMed: 20166101
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008370 -
Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied... Apr 2002Somatostatins are neuropeptides that exert a downregulatory effect on various physiological processes. Somatostatin analogues are used in the imaging and management of... (Review)
Review
Somatostatins are neuropeptides that exert a downregulatory effect on various physiological processes. Somatostatin analogues are used in the imaging and management of various tumour types. Their role in thyroid cancer has not as yet been fully elucidated. A systematic review of the literature using the keywords thyroid, cancer and somatostatin revealed 263 references. This paper summarizes the current knowledge of the role of somatostatins in thyroid cancer and assesses their future potential.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Autoradiography; Humans; Octreotide; Peptides, Cyclic; Somatostatin; Thyroid Neoplasms
PubMed: 11994118
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2002.00543.x