-
Human Reproduction Update Jul 2017Infertility is a global public health issue, affecting 15% of all couples of reproductive age. Male factors, including decreased semen quality, are responsible for ~25%... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Infertility is a global public health issue, affecting 15% of all couples of reproductive age. Male factors, including decreased semen quality, are responsible for ~25% of these cases. The dietary pattern, the components of the diet and nutrients have been studied as possible determinants of sperm function and/or fertility.
OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE
Previous systematic reviews have been made of the few heterogeneous low-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted in small samples of participants and investigating the effect of specific nutrients and nutritional supplements on male infertility. However, as yet there has been no systematic review of observational studies.
SEARCH METHODS
A comprehensive systematic review was made of the published literature, from the earliest available online indexing year to November 2016, in accordance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We have included cross-sectional, case-control and prospective and retrospective studies in which fertile/infertile men were well defined (men with sperm disorders, sperm DNA damage, varicocele or idiopathic infertility). The primary outcomes were semen quality or fecundability. With the data extracted, we evaluated and scored the quality of the studies selected. We excluded RCTs, animal studies, review articles and low-quality studies.
OUTCOMES
A total of 1944 articles were identified, of which 35 were selected for qualitative analysis. Generally, the results indicated that healthy diets rich in some nutrients such as omega-3 fatty acids, some antioxidants (vitamin E, vitamin C, β-carotene, selenium, zinc, cryptoxanthin and lycopene), other vitamins (vitamin D and folate) and low in saturated fatty acids and trans-fatty acids were inversely associated with low semen quality parameters. Fish, shellfish and seafood, poultry, cereals, vegetables and fruits, low-fat dairy and skimmed milk were positively associated with several sperm quality parameters. However, diets rich in processed meat, soy foods, potatoes, full-fat dairy and total dairy products, cheese, coffee, alcohol, sugar-sweetened beverages and sweets have been detrimentally associated with the quality of semen in some studies. As far as fecundability is concerned, a high intake of alcohol, caffeine and red meat and processed meat by males has a negative influence on the chance of pregnancy or fertilization rates in their partners.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS
Male adherence to a healthy diet could improve semen quality and fecundability rates. Since observational studies may prove associations but not causation, the associations summarized in the present review need to be confirmed with large prospective cohort studies and especially with well-designed RCTs.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Diet; Feeding Behavior; Female; Fertility; Food; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Observational Studies as Topic; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Semen Analysis
PubMed: 28333357
DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx006 -
Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine Apr 2017This study reviewed the efficacy and safety of the three surgical approaches for varicocele (microsurgical, laparoscopic, and open varicocelectomy). A systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study reviewed the efficacy and safety of the three surgical approaches for varicocele (microsurgical, laparoscopic, and open varicocelectomy). A systematic review of the relevant randomized clinical trials was performed. Trials were identified from specialized trials register of the Cochrane UGDP Group, the Cochrane library, additional electronic searches (mainly MEDLINE, EMBSAE, SCI, CBM), and handsearching. Clinical trials comparing microsurgical, laparoscopic and open varicocelectomies were included. Statistical analysis was managed using Review Manager 5.3. Seven clinical trials of 1,781 patients were included. The meta-analysis indicated that compared with open varicocelectomy, microsurgery had a higher pregnancy rate (p=0.002), while there was nonsignificant difference between microsurgical and laparoscopic varicocelectomies or between laparoscopic and open varicocelectomies. Both microsurgical and laparoscopic varicocelectomies had a greater increase in postoperative sperm concentration than open varicocelectomy (p=0.008 and p=0.001, respectively). Microsurgical varicocelectomy also showed better improvement in postoperative sperm motility (p=0.02). Compared with the other two, microsurgical varicocelectomy had the longest operative time (p=0.01 and p=0.0004 respectively). A nonsignificant difference was found in the hospital stay between the three approaches, whereas microsurgical and laparoscopic varicocelectomies had a shorter time to return to work. Moreover, microsurgical varicocelectomy had a lower incidence of postoperative complications and recurrence compared with the others. Analysis of current evidence shows that microsurgical varicocelectomy has a longer operative time, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and recurrence than laparoscopic and open varicocelectomies, and shows a higher pregnancy rate, with a greater increase in postoperative sperm concentration, better improvement in postoperative sperm motility, and shorter time to return to work than open varicocelectomy.
Topics: Adult; Chi-Square Distribution; Female; Fertility; Humans; Infertility, Male; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Microsurgery; Odds Ratio; Postoperative Complications; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Recovery of Function; Return to Work; Risk Factors; Sperm Count; Sperm Motility; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urogenital Surgical Procedures; Varicocele; Young Adult
PubMed: 28301253
DOI: 10.1080/19396368.2016.1265161 -
Clinical Anatomy (New York, N.Y.) May 2017The technique of triggering the cremasteric reflex and its respective signaling pathway is not described uniformly throughout the literature. As this reflex is a useful... (Review)
Review
The technique of triggering the cremasteric reflex and its respective signaling pathway is not described uniformly throughout the literature. As this reflex is a useful sign in diagnosing testicular torsion, orchitis, varicocele, and undescended testis, it seems desirable to identify and define the correct mechanism. Our aim was to investigate how the cremasteric reflex and its signaling pathway are described in the current literature and how the variability of the innervation of the inguinal region could affect the frequency of this reflex. Thirty-five original articles and 18 current textbooks were included after searching PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus for the terms "cremaster muscle," "cremasteric reflex," and "genitofemoral nerve" and after applying all exclusion criteria. This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA Statement Rules. Eliciting the cremasteric reflex was defined either as "rubbing of the upper inner thigh" or "rubbing of the skin under the inguinal ligament." Four different afferent pathways among studies and three different pathways among textbooks were described and the frequency of an intact reflex ranged between 42.7 and 92.5% in newborns and between 61.7 and 100% in boys between 24 months and 12 years. Owing to the huge differences among the studies investigated and the lack of convincing results, it is not possible to define the correct way to elicit the cremasteric reflex. Four hypotheses about the afferent pathway are proposed on the basis of the literature. Further studies should be performed, concentrating on the afferent pathway(s) with respect to the individual innervation of the inguinal region. Clin. Anat. 30:498-507, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Topics: Electromyography; Humans; Lumbosacral Plexus; Male; Reflex; Spermatic Cord Torsion; Testis
PubMed: 28295651
DOI: 10.1002/ca.22875 -
Fertility and Sterility Nov 2016To evaluate how varicocele repair (VR) impacts pregnancy (PRs) and live birth rates in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction wherein the male partner has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Undergoing varicocele repair before assisted reproduction improves pregnancy rate and live birth rate in azoospermic and oligospermic men with a varicocele: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate how varicocele repair (VR) impacts pregnancy (PRs) and live birth rates in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproduction wherein the male partner has oligospermia or azoospermia and a history of varicocele.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S)
Azoospermic and oligospermic males with varicoceles and in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) with IUI, IVF, or testicular sperm extraction (TESE) with IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
INTERVENTION(S)
Measurement of PRs, live birth, and sperm extraction rates.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Odds ratios for the impact of VR on PRs, live birth, and sperm extraction rates for couples undergoing ART.
RESULT(S)
Seven articles involving a total of 1,241 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that VR improved live birth rates for the oligospermic (odds ratio [OR] = 1.699) and combined oligospermic/azoospermic groups (OR = 1.761). Pregnancy rates were higher in the azoospermic group (OR = 2.336) and combined oligospermic/azoospermic groups (OR = 1.760). Live birth rates were higher for patients undergoing IUI after VR (OR = 8.360). Sperm retrieval rates were higher in persistently azoospermic men after VR (OR = 2.509).
CONCLUSION(S)
Oligospermic and azoospermic patients with clinical varicocele who undergo VR experience improved live birth rates and PRs with IVF or IVF/ICSI. For persistently azoospermic men after VR requiring TESE for IVF/ICSI, VR improves sperm retrieval rates. Therefore, VR should be considered to have substantial benefits for couples with a clinical varicocele even if oligospermia or azoospermia persists after repair and ART is required.
Topics: Azoospermia; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Humans; Live Birth; Male; Odds Ratio; Oligospermia; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Risk Factors; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Sperm Retrieval; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male; Varicocele
PubMed: 27526630
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1093 -
Asian Journal of Andrology 2017The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Comparison of surgical effect and postoperative patient experience between laparoendoscopic single-site and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical effect and patient experience of laparoendoscopic single-site varicocelectomy (LESSV) and conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The candidate studies were included after literature search of database Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Related information on essential data and outcome measures was extracted from the eligible studies by two independent authors, and a meta-analysis was conducted using STATA 12.0 software. Subgroup analyses were conducted by study design (RCT and non-RCT). The odds ratio (OR) or standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to estimate the outcome measures. Seven articles were included in our meta-analysis. The results indicated that patient who had undergone LESSV had a shorter duration of back to work (overall: SMD = -1.454, 95% CI: -2.502--0.405, P = 0.007; non-RCT: SMD = -2.906, 95% CI: -3.796--2.017, P = 0.000; and RCT: SMD = -0.841, 95% CI: -1.393--0.289, P = 0.003) and less pain experience at 3 h or 6 h (SMD = -0.447, 95% CI: -0.754--0.139, P = 0.004), day 1 (SMD = -0.477, 95% CI: -0.905--0.05, P = 0.029), and day 2 (SMD = -0.612, 95% CI: -1.099--0.125, P = 0.014) postoperatively based on RCT studies. However, the meta-analyses based on operation time, clinical effect (improvement of semen quality and scrotal pain relief), and complications (hydrocele and recurrence) yielded nonsignificant results. In conclusion, LESSV had a rapid recovery and less pain experience over conventional laparoscopic varicocelectomy. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the two varicocelectomy techniques in terms of the clinical effect and the incidence of hydrocele and varicocele recurrence. More high-quality studies are warranted for a comprehensive conclusion.
Topics: Endoscopy; Humans; Laparoscopy; Male; Operative Time; Pain, Postoperative; Patient Satisfaction; Postoperative Complications; Semen Analysis; Testicular Hydrocele; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male; Varicocele
PubMed: 27212128
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.181194 -
Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry :... 2016The aim of this study was to elucidate the usefulness of platelet indices, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and platelet count in diagnosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND/AIMS
The aim of this study was to elucidate the usefulness of platelet indices, mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and platelet count in diagnosis and monitoring of varicocele.
METHODS
The current study included 525 patients and 379 healthy subjects from five eligible studies. We performed meta-analysis of MPV, PDW, and platelet count and mean differences in these platelet indices between healthy subjects and varicocele patients.
RESULTS
The pooled MPVs were 8.168 fL (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.589 to 8.747) and 8.801 fL (95% CI 8.028 to 9.574) in healthy subjects and varicocele patients, respectively. The pooled mean difference in MPV between healthy subjects and varicocele patients was 0.834 fL in case-control studies (95% CI 0.195 to 1.473, P = 0.011). In both healthy subjects and varicocele patients, low platelet count subgroups showed higher MPV than high platelet count subgroups. The mean difference in MPV was higher in low platelet count subgroup. There was no significant difference in PDW between healthy subjects and varicocele patients.
CONCLUSION
Taken together, our data showed that platelet count was significantly lower in varicocele patients than in healthy subjects. Varicocele patients showed significantly higher MPV and lower platelet count than healthy subjects. MPV levels of patients differed according to platelet counts.
Topics: Blood Platelets; Humans; Male; Mean Platelet Volume; Platelet Count; Varicocele
PubMed: 27189836
DOI: 10.1159/000445579 -
International Urology and Nephrology Jun 2016We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of artery preserving versus artery non-preserving in laparoscopic varicocelectomy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of artery preserving versus artery non-preserving in laparoscopic varicocelectomy.
METHODS
All publications up until October 2015 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane library. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) that compared the difference in two operative approaches in laparoscopic varicocelectomy were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata version 12.0.
RESULTS
A total of four RCTs and ten CSs involving 503 cases with artery preserving and 911 cases with artery non-preserving met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that artery preserving had higher recurrence rate [risk ratio (RR) = 2.91, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.83-4.61; P = 0.000], lower incidence of hydrocele formation (RR = 0.18; 95 % CI 0.08-0.42; P = 0.000), and prolonged operating time [standard mean difference (SMD) = 1.27; 95 % CI 0.17-2.37; P = 0.023], compared with artery non-preserving in laparoscopic varicocelectomy. The results were similar in postoperative catch-up growth (RR = 1.00; 95 % CI 0.86-1.17; P = 0.985) and testicular atrophy (RR = 0.36; 95 % CI 0.09-1.54; P = 0.169). Besides, no significant difference was found in sperm concentration, motility, and normal morphology between two groups, as well as on postoperative pregnancy rate (RR = 0.95; 95 % CI 0.65-1.40; P = 0.809).
CONCLUSION
With the advantages of less recurrence, easier operating and less time spending, and comparable results in other respects, artery non-preserving is preferable to artery preserving in laparoscopic varicocelectomy, although there is a relatively high incidence of hydrocele formation. Considering the limitation of included studies, more large-scaled RCTs are required to confirm the present findings.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Male; Testis; Varicocele
PubMed: 26971102
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1254-7 -
Asian Journal of Andrology 2016Varicocele recurrence is one of the most common complications associated with varicocele repair. A systematic review was performed to evaluate varicocele recurrence... (Review)
Review
Varicocele recurrence is one of the most common complications associated with varicocele repair. A systematic review was performed to evaluate varicocele recurrence rates, anatomic causes of recurrence, and methods of management of recurrent varicoceles. The PubMed database was evaluated using keywords "recurrent" and "varicocele" as well as MESH criteria "recurrent" and "varicocele." Articles were not included that were not in English, represented single case reports, focused solely on subclinical varicocele, or focused solely on a pediatric population (age <18). Rates of recurrence vary with the technique of varicocele repair from 0% to 35%. Anatomy of recurrence can be defined by venography. Management of varicocele recurrence can be surgical or via embolization.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Child; Humans; Male; Phlebography; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Treatment Failure; Varicocele; Young Adult
PubMed: 26806078
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.171578 -
Asian Journal of Andrology 2016This study investigated the effects of varicocele on semen parameters in infertile men based on the new 2010 World Health Organization laboratory manual for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study investigated the effects of varicocele on semen parameters in infertile men based on the new 2010 World Health Organization laboratory manual for the examination of human semen. Semen analysis results (volume, sperm count, motility, and morphology) were the primary outcomes. An electronic search to collect the data was conducted using the Medline/PubMed, SJU discover, and Google Scholar databases. We searched articles published from 2010 to August 2015, i.e., after the publication of the 2010 WHO manual. We included only those studies that reported the actual semen parameters of adult infertile men diagnosed with clinical varicocele and contained a control group of either fertile men or normozoospermic men who were not diagnosed with varicocele. Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 1232 men. Varicocele was associated with reduced sperm count (mean difference: -44.48 × 10 [6] ml-1 ; 95% CI: -61.45, -27.51 × 10 [6] ml-1 ; P < 0.001), motility (mean difference: -26.67%; 95% CI: -34.27, -19.08; P < 0.001), and morphology (mean difference: -19.68%; 95% CI: -29.28, -10.07; P < 0.001) but not semen volume (mean difference: -0.23 ml; 95% CI: -0.64, 0.17). Subgroup analyses indicated that the magnitude of effect was influenced by control subtype but not WHO laboratory manual edition used for semen assessment. We conclude that varicocele is a significant risk factor that negatively affects semen quality, but the observed pooled effect size on semen parameters does not seem to be affected by the WHO laboratory manual edition. Given most of the studies published after 2010 still utilized the 1999 manual for semen analysis, further research is required to fully understand the clinical implication of the 2010 WHO laboratory manual on the association between varicocele and semen parameters.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Semen; Semen Analysis; Sperm Count; Varicocele; World Health Organization
PubMed: 26780872
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.172638 -
Asian Journal of Andrology 2016Varicocele is a common problem in reproductive medicine practice. A varicocele is identified in 15% of healthy men and up to 35% of men with primary infertility. The... (Review)
Review
Varicocele is a common problem in reproductive medicine practice. A varicocele is identified in 15% of healthy men and up to 35% of men with primary infertility. The exact pathophysiology of varicoceles is not very well understood, especially regarding its effect on male infertility. We have conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating the epidemiology of varicocele in the general population and in men presenting with infertility. In this article, we have identified some of the factors that can influence the epidemiological aspects of varicoceles. We also recognize that varicocele epidemiology remains incompletely understood, and there is a need for well-designed, large-scale studies to fully define the epidemiological aspects of this condition.
Topics: Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Varicocele
PubMed: 26763551
DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.172640