-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2014Vasectomy is an increasingly popular and effective family planning method. A variety of vasectomy techniques are used worldwide, including vas occlusion techniques... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vasectomy is an increasingly popular and effective family planning method. A variety of vasectomy techniques are used worldwide, including vas occlusion techniques (excision and ligation, thermal or electrocautery, and mechanical and chemical occlusion methods), as well as vasectomy with vas irrigation or with fascial interposition. Vasectomy guidelines largely rely on information from observational studies. Ideally, the choice of vasectomy techniques should be based on the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness, safety, acceptability and costs of vasectomy techniques for male sterilization.
SEARCH METHODS
In February 2014, we updated the searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, POPLINE and LILACS. We looked for recent clinical trials in ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Previous searches also included EMBASE. For the initial review, we searched the reference lists of relevant articles and book chapters.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs comparing vasectomy techniques, which could include suture ligature, surgical clips, thermal or electrocautery, chemical occlusion, vas plugs, vas excision, open-ended vas, fascial interposition, or vas irrigation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We assessed all titles and abstracts located in the literature searches. Two reviewers independently extracted data from articles identified for inclusion. Outcome measures include contraceptive efficacy, safety, discontinuation, and acceptability. Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for dichotomous outcomes, such as azoospermia. The mean difference (MD) was used for the continuous variable of operating time.
MAIN RESULTS
Six studies met the inclusion criteria. One trial compared vas occlusion with clips versus a conventional vasectomy technique. No difference was found in failure to reach azoospermia (no sperm detected). Three trials examined vasectomy with vas irrigation. Two studies looked at irrigation with water versus no irrigation, while one examined irrigation with water versus the spermicide euflavine. None found a difference between the groups for time to azoospermia. However, one trial reported that the median number of ejaculations to azoospermia was lower in the euflavine group compared to the water irrigation group. One high-quality trial compared vasectomy with fascial interposition versus vasectomy without fascial interposition. The fascial interposition group was less likely to have vasectomy failure. Fascial interposition had more surgical difficulties, but the groups were similar in side effects. Lastly, one trial found that an intra-vas was less likely to produce azoospermia than was no-scalpel vasectomy. More men were satisfied with the intra-vas device, however.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For vas occlusion with clips or vasectomy with vas irrigation, no conclusions can be made as those studies were of low quality and underpowered. Fascial interposition reduced vasectomy failure. An intra-vas device was less effective in reducing sperm count than was no-scalpel vasectomy. RCTs examining other vasectomy techniques were not available. More and better quality research is needed to examine vasectomy techniques.
Topics: Aminoacridines; Humans; Male; Oligospermia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spermatocidal Agents; Surgical Instruments; Therapeutic Irrigation; Vas Deferens; Vasectomy
PubMed: 24683020
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003991.pub4 -
Ginecologia Y Obstetricia de Mexico May 2013Recently Mexican Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Colleges (Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, FEMECOG) published the Mexican... (Review)
Review
Recently Mexican Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Colleges (Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Obstetricia y Ginecologia, FEMECOG) published the Mexican guideline forthe management of male infertility, which suggests performing genetic laboratory tests as part of diagnosis and management of infertile patients and states that these should receive genetic counseling. This paper reviews the genetic approach proposed by Mexican guideline. A systematic review of medical literature was performed in Pubmed and Web of Knowledge from 1980 to 2012 in order to find reports of genetic variants associated to male infertility in Mexican patients. Also it is discussed the current knowledge of these variants, their clinical implications and finally the guidelines and recommendations for their molecular diagnosis. Most genetic variants in Mexican infertile patients are chromosome abnormalities. In relation to other variants there is only a report of Y chromosome microdeletions, repeated CAG in androgen receptor and more common mutations in CFTR, and other article reporting mutations in CFTR in patients with congenital absence of vas deferens. Little is known about the genetics of Mexican infertile patients apart from chromosome abnormalities. However, the contribution of genetics as etiology of male infertility is taking more relevance and currently the consensual management of infertile male should include the screening of genetic background. This review pretends to be a quick guide for clinicians who want to know about reports of genetic variants related to male infertility in Mexican population and how to approach their diagnosis.
Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Deletion; Chromosomes, Human, Y; Cystic Fibrosis; Genetic Variation; Humans; Infertility, Male; Male; Mexico; Sex Chromosome Aberrations; Sex Chromosome Disorders of Sex Development
PubMed: 23819425
DOI: No ID Found -
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and... Aug 2012About 3-6% of vasectomized men requested vasectomy reversal, for various reasons. Vasal patency (VP) is an important surrogate outcome of vasectomy reversal. This... (Review)
Review
About 3-6% of vasectomized men requested vasectomy reversal, for various reasons. Vasal patency (VP) is an important surrogate outcome of vasectomy reversal. This article reviews the impact of surgical skills, surgical approaches, intraoperative vasal fluid characteristics and the length of obstructive interval on VP. Based on the best available evidence, the rate of patency is related to the operative frequency of the surgeons, with better results obtained by surgeons who perform the operations at least 10 times annually. Microsurgical vasovasostomy is the preferred technique for durable good results. One-layer vasovasostomy and two-layer vasovasostomy seem to be equal with regard to VP. The rate of patency following vasovasostomy in the convoluted vas and vasovasostomy in the straight vas is comparable. The patency rate is high in men with clear intraoperative vasal fluid in at least one vas. VP is still high among patients with a long obstructive interval. In conclusion, surgical skills and intraoperative vasal fluid characteristics are the most important predictors of VP. Postoperative semen quality and the age of the female partner determine the chance of spontaneous conception in these couples.
Topics: Clinical Competence; Humans; Male; Microsurgery; Prognosis; Semen Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vas Deferens; Vasovasostomy
PubMed: 22452615
DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2012.669790 -
Human Reproduction (Oxford, England) Jan 2012Numerous studies have reported CFTR mutations in CBAVD (congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens) patients, but their results are not completely consistent.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Numerous studies have reported CFTR mutations in CBAVD (congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens) patients, but their results are not completely consistent. Here, we present a systemic review and meta-analysis with emphasis on clarifying further the genetic association of CFTR mutations with CBAVD.
METHODS
We searched the MEDLINE database until March, 2011 for eligible articles reporting CFTR mutations in CBAVD. Relevant data from each included study were abstracted by two independent reviewers. The overall frequency of CFTR mutations in CBAVD and the odds ratio (OR) for common specific alleles were pooled under random-effect or fixed-effect model as appropriate. Subgroup analysis was performed by ethnicity, and potential heterogeneity and bias were both assessed.
RESULTS
Among CBAVD patients, 78% had at least one CFTR mutation, 46% having two and 28% only one. Moreover, the common heterozygous F508del/5T and F508del/R117H were observed in 17 and 4% of CBAVD cases respectively, and the allele frequency in CBAVD was 17% for F508del, 25% for 5T and 3% for R117H. Subgroup analysis indicated an increased frequency of cases with two mutations in Caucasian patients than in Non-Caucasian (68 versus 50%, P= 0.012), but no differences for cases with at least one mutation (88 versus 77%, P= 0.163) or with only one mutation (17 versus 25%, P= 0.115). Caucasian patients had higher F508del frequency, but lower 5T frequency, than Non-Caucasian (22 versus 8%, P= 0.001; 20 versus 31%, P= 0.009). Summary OR was 9.25 for 5T [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.07-12.11, P= 0.000], with moderate heterogeneity (I(2)= 49.20%, P= 0.019) and evident bias (Egger's test, P= 0.005), and it was 19.43 for 5T/(TG)12_13 (95% CI 10.48-30.03, P= 0.000) without any evidence of heterogeneity (I(2)= 0.1%, P= 0.391) and bias (Egger's test, P= 0.160). The OR for 5T/(TG)12_13 was significantly higher than that for 5T allele (P= 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, our results demonstrate a high frequency of CFTR mutations in CBAVD patients, and these exhibit evident ethnic differences. In addition, 5T allele and 5T/(TG)12_13 may contribute to the increased risk for CBAVD, with the 5T penetrance probably being modulated by adjacent (TG)12_13.
Topics: Alleles; Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genotype; Heterozygote; Homozygote; Humans; Male; Male Urogenital Diseases; Mutation; Odds Ratio; Risk; Vas Deferens
PubMed: 22081250
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der377 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2007Vasectomy is an increasingly popular and effective family planning method. A variety of vasectomy techniques are used worldwide, including various vas occlusion... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vasectomy is an increasingly popular and effective family planning method. A variety of vasectomy techniques are used worldwide, including various vas occlusion techniques (excision and ligation, thermal or electrocautery, and mechanical and chemical occlusion methods), as well as vasectomy with vas irrigation or with fascial interposition. Vasectomy guidelines largely rely on information from observational studies. Ideally, the choice of vasectomy techniques should be based on the best available evidence from randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness, safety, acceptability and costs of vasectomy techniques for male sterilization.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the computerized databases of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, POPLINE and LILACS. In addition, we searched the reference lists of relevant articles and book chapters.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials comparing vasectomy techniques.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We assessed all titles and abstracts located in the literature searches. Two reviewers independently extracted data from articles identified for inclusion. Outcome measures include contraceptive efficacy, safety, discontinuation, and acceptability.
MAIN RESULTS
Six studies met the inclusion criteria. One trial compared vas occlusion with clips versus a conventional vasectomy technique. No difference was found in failure to reach azoospermia. Three trials examined vasectomy with vas irrigation. Two studies looked at irrigation with water versus no irrigation, while one examined irrigation with water versus the spermicide euflavine. None found a difference between the groups for time to azoospermia. However, one trial reported that the median number of ejaculations to azoospermia was lower in the euflavine group compared to the water irrigation group. One high-quality trial compared vasectomy with fascial interposition versus vasectomy without fascial interposition. The fascial interposition group was less likely to have vasectomy failure. Fascial interposition had more surgical difficulties, but the groups were similar in side effects. Lastly, one trial found that an intra-vas was less likely to produce azoospermia than was no-scalpel vasectomy. More men were satisfied with the intra-vas device, however.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For vas occlusion with clips or vasectomy with vas irrigation, no conclusions can be made as those studies were of low quality and underpowered. Fascial interposition reduced vasectomy failure. An intra-vas device was less effective in reducing sperm count than was no-scalpel vasectomy. Randomized controlled trials examining other vasectomy techniques were not available. More and better quality research is needed to examine vasectomy techniques.
Topics: Humans; Male; Oligospermia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surgical Instruments; Therapeutic Irrigation; Vas Deferens; Vasectomy
PubMed: 17443535
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003991.pub3 -
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey Nov 2005Nonhormonal drugs for contraception in men may have advantages over hormonal methods. The nonhormonal methods can have more rapid onset and less interference with... (Review)
Review
UNLABELLED
Nonhormonal drugs for contraception in men may have advantages over hormonal methods. The nonhormonal methods can have more rapid onset and less interference with androgen-dependent functions. This systematic review summarizes the clinical studies evaluating nonhormonal drugs administered to men for contraception. Relevant clinical results were found for gossypol, which is derived from the cotton plant, and for extracts of Tripterygium, a plant used in Chinese traditional medicine. Randomized, controlled trials were available on the efficacy of gossypol and on the effect of gossypol on potassium levels. Gossypol had problems with low efficacy and toxicity. For Tripterygium, 2 observational studies described men who were treated for rheumatoid arthritis. Although sperm density was lower among those taking Tripterygium, later reports indicated some toxicity. Nonclinical research continues on isolates of Tripterygium. No clinical studies for contraception in men were found for nonhormonal vaccines or neem, which is also a plant used for medicinal purposes. Clinical trials studied injecting styrene maleic anhydride into the vas deferens, but no comparative data were provided. At this time, no safe and effective nonhormonal drug is available for contraception in men.
TARGET AUDIENCE
Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After completion of this article, the reader should be able to state that the number of studies concerning the use of nonhormonal drugs for male contraception are very limited, point out that the two nonhormonal drugs used to a small degree have varying results and serious side effects, and recall that there are limited clinical studies on use of vas deferens injections and vaccines in humans.
Topics: Contraceptive Agents, Male; Gossypol; Humans; Male; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Plant Preparations; Potassium; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tripterygium
PubMed: 16250923
DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000182905.71077.13 -
The Journal of Urology Jul 2005Post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is the traditional method of confirming sterility after vasectomy. However, PVSA protocols vary in the end points accepted, and the... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Post-vasectomy semen analysis (PVSA) is the traditional method of confirming sterility after vasectomy. However, PVSA protocols vary in the end points accepted, and the number and timing of tests. In this systematic review we make evidence based recommendations on the appropriate PVSA protocol.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Databases (MEDLINE, Current Contents, Cochrane Library and EMBASE) were searched up to and including March 2003. Studies were included if they dealt with post-vasectomy testing and contained data on at least 1 of the time or number of ejaculations to azoospermia, pregnancy, repeat vasectomy and histological analysis of vas specimens.
RESULTS
A total of 56 studies were included in the review. Time to achieve azoospermia was variable, although the median incidence of patients with azoospermia was consistently more than 80% after 3 months and after 20 ejaculations. A small percent of patients (14,845 or 1.4%) demonstrated persistent nonmotile sperm, although some of them eventually achieved azoospermia. The reappearance of nonmotile sperm was reported in 7 studies, occurring up to 22 months after vasectomy.
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence supports a PVSA protocol with 1 test showing azoospermia after 3 months and 20 ejaculations. If the sample is positive, periodic testing can continue until azoospermia is achieved. Patients with persistent nonmotile sperm in low numbers could be given cautious assurance of success. No evidence was located to support histological testing of the excised vas deferens.
Topics: Clinical Protocols; Humans; Male; Oligospermia; Postoperative Care; Sperm Count; Vasectomy
PubMed: 15947571
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161595.82642.fc -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2004Vasectomy is an increasingly popular and effective family planning method. A variety of vasectomy techniques are used worldwide including various vas occlusion... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Vasectomy is an increasingly popular and effective family planning method. A variety of vasectomy techniques are used worldwide including various vas occlusion techniques (excision and ligation, thermal or electrocautery, and mechanical and chemical occlusion methods), vas irrigation and fascial interposition. Vasectomy guidelines largely rely on information from observational studies. Ideally, the choice of vasectomy techniques should be based on the best available evidence from randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to compare the effectiveness, safety, acceptability and costs of vasectomy techniques for male sterilization.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the computerized databases the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, Popline and LILACS. In addition, we searched the reference lists of relevant articles and book chapters.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing vasectomy techniques.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We assessed all titles and abstracts located in the literature searches and two reviewers independently extracted articles identified for inclusion. Data were presented in the text of the review. Outcome measures include contraceptive efficacy, safety, discontinuation, and acceptability.
MAIN RESULTS
Two trials compared vas occlusion with clips versus a conventional vasectomy technique; both were of poor quality. Neither trial found a difference between the two groups with regard to the primary outcome of failure to reach azoospermia. Four trials examined vas irrigation: three compared water irrigation with no irrigation and one compared water irrigation with euflavine. All of the trials were of poor quality. None of the trials found a significant difference between the groups with respect to the primary outcome of time to azoospermia. However, one trial found that the median number of ejaculations to azoospermia was significantly lower in the euflavine group compared to the water irrigation group. The one trial that compared vasectomy with fascial interposition versus vasectomy without fascial interposition was a high quality, large study that has only been partially reported at the time of this review. The fascial interposition group was significantly more likely to be related to vasectomy success (azoospermia) at 22 weeks. However, fascial interposition also was associated with significantly more surgical difficulties.
REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS
No conclusions can be made about the effectiveness, safety, acceptability and costs of vas occlusion technique or vas irrigation as studies that examined these were of low quality and underpowered. Fascial interposition is associated with improved vasectomy success but is associated with some increased surgical difficulty. Randomized controlled trials examining other vasectomy techniques were not available. More research is required to examine vasectomy techniques.
Topics: Humans; Male; Oligospermia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sterilization, Reproductive; Surgical Instruments; Therapeutic Irrigation; Vas Deferens; Vasectomy
PubMed: 15266511
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003991.pub2