-
Systematic Reviews Jan 2024The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and patient... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and patient outcomes in surgical settings.
METHODS
Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and CNKI databases from November 2010, when the VIS was first published, to December 2022. Additional studies were identified through hand-searching the reference lists of included studies. Eligible studies were those published in English that evaluated the association between the VIS and short- or long-term patient outcomes in both pediatric and adult surgical patients. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan Manager version 5.3, and quality assessment followed the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists.
RESULTS
A total of 58 studies comprising 29,920 patients were included in the systematic review, 34 of which were eligible for meta-analysis. Early postoperative VIS was found to be associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR 5.20, 95% CI 3.78-7.16), mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.12), acute kidney injury (AKI) (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.41), poor outcomes (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04), and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU (OR 3.50, 95% CI 2.25-5.44). The optimal cutoff value for the VIS as an outcome predictor varied between studies, ranging from 10 to 30.
CONCLUSION
Elevated early postoperative VIS is associated with various adverse outcomes, including acute kidney injury (AKI), mechanical ventilation duration, mortality, poor outcomes, and length of stay (LOS) in the ICU. Monitoring the VIS upon return to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) could assist medical teams in risk stratification, targeted interventions, and parent counseling.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42022359100.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Acute Kidney Injury; Checklist; Databases, Factual; Intensive Care Units; Length of Stay; General Surgery; Patient Outcome Assessment
PubMed: 38184601
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02403-1 -
Brain Sciences Dec 2023Acetazolamide is a non-competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase, an enzyme expressed in different cells of the central nervous system (CNS) and involved in the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acetazolamide is a non-competitive inhibitor of carbonic anhydrase, an enzyme expressed in different cells of the central nervous system (CNS) and involved in the regulation of cerebral blood flow (CBF). The aim of this review was to understand the effects of acetazolamide on CBF, intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO) after an acute brain injury (ABI).
METHODS
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA), we performed a comprehensive, computer-based, literature research on the PubMed platform to identify studies that have reported the effects on CBF, ICP, or PbtO of acetazolamide administered either for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracerebral hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
RESULTS
From the initial search, 3430 records were identified and, through data selection, 11 of them were included for the qualitative analysis. No data on the effect of acetazolamide on ICP or PbtO were found. Cerebral vasomotor reactivity (VMR-i.e., the changing in vascular tone due to a vasoactive substance) to acetazolamide tends to change during the evolution of ABI, with the nadir occurring during the subacute stage. Moreover, VMR reduction was correlated with clinical outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review showed that the available studies on the effects of acetazolamide on brain hemodynamics in patients with ABI are scarce. Further research is required to better understand the potential role of this drug in ABI patients.
PubMed: 38137126
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13121678 -
Eye (London, England) Apr 2024Amacrine cells (ACs) are the most structurally and functionally diverse neuron type in the retina. Different ACs have distinct functions, such as neuropeptide secretion... (Review)
Review
Amacrine cells (ACs) are the most structurally and functionally diverse neuron type in the retina. Different ACs have distinct functions, such as neuropeptide secretion and inhibitory connection. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) -ergic -ACs are retina gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) -ergic -ACs that were discovered long ago. They secrete VIP and form connections with bipolar cells (BCs), other ACs, and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). They have a specific structure, density, distribution, and function. They play an important role in myopia, light stimulated responses, retinal vascular disease and other ocular diseases. Their significance in the study of refractive development and disease is increasing daily. However, a systematic review of the structure and function of retinal VIP-ACs is lacking. We discussed the detailed characteristics of VIP-ACs from every aspect across species and providing systematic knowledge base for future studies. Our review led to the main conclusion that retinal VIP-ACs develop early, and although their morphology and distribution across species are not the same, they have similar functions in a wide range of ocular diseases based on their function of secreting neuropeptides and forming inhibitory connections with other cells.
Topics: Humans; Amacrine Cells; Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide; Retina; Retinal Ganglion Cells; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid
PubMed: 38066110
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02844-x -
Medicine Nov 2023Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is characterized by severe symptoms and a poor prognosis, especially with the recent global impact of novel coronavirus in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) is characterized by severe symptoms and a poor prognosis, especially with the recent global impact of novel coronavirus in recent years. The use of glucocorticoids in sCAP is currently a subject of debate. To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of glucocorticoids and provide guidance for their rational use in clinical practice, we conducted this study.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure using the following search terms: "pneumonia", "pneumonias", "Pulmonary Inflammation", "Pulmonary Inflammations", "Lung Inflammation", and "Lung Inflammations". The primary outcomes included mortality and the length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes included the duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of vasoactive drug use, gastrointestinal bleeding, and multiple infections. The Cochrane Collaboration was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Stata/MP14 was used for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
These studies contained information on 1252 patients who received glucocorticoids and 1280 patients who did not. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in terms of mortality [risk ratio (RR) = 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-1.07, P > .05], gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.83-2.30, P < .05), multiple infections (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 0.90-1.53, P > .05) and length of hospital stay (mean difference [MD] = -0.87, 95% CI: -2.35 to 0.61, P > .05) between the hormonal and nonhormonal groups. However, there was a significant difference in the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD = -1.54; 95% CI, -1.89 to -1.12, P < .05) and the duration of use of vasoactive drugs (MD = -14.09, 95% CI: -15.72 to -12.46, P < .05).
CONCLUSION
Glucocorticoids reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation duration and vasoactive drug use in sCAP patients without increasing the risk of adverse events including hyperglycemia and multiple infections. However, there was no significant difference in mortality or length of hospital stay in sCAP patients between glucocorticoid and non-glucocorticoid groups. Glucocorticoids could be recommended for patients with sCAP with respiratory failure or hemodynamic instability.
Topics: Humans; Glucocorticoids; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pneumonia; Community-Acquired Infections; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Inflammation
PubMed: 37986401
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036047 -
Alternative Therapies in Health and... Nov 2023This systematic review aimed to identify independent prognostic factors of severe pneumonia.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review aimed to identify independent prognostic factors of severe pneumonia.
METHODS
A systematic search was undertaken in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to March 2023 to find cohort studies investigating the association between prognostic factors and adverse outcomes of severe pneumonia in adult patients. The study selection process involved screening the title and abstract of articles to identify relevant studies on severe pneumonia in adult patients. Inclusion criteria included studies with a prospective or retrospective longitudinal design, investigating prognostic factors, and performing multivariate analysis. Exclusion criteria included non-English or non-Chinese studies, studies focusing on severe pneumonia in children, studies conducting only univariate analysis, and conference abstracts, reviews, and case reports. The risk of bias was assessed by the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool.
RESULTS
A total of 27 published studies, including both prospective and retrospective cohort studies, were included. These studies reported on 53 different prognostic factors and covered four unique outcomes. The quality assessment indicated that 59.3% of the studies had a low risk of bias. Age, functional dependence, heart rate, and oxygen saturation/respiratory rate index were found to be associated with mortality. Additionally, various laboratory indexes, such as serum cholinesterase, albumin, and blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio, demonstrated either protective or risk factors for prognosis. Injury and comorbidities, including acute renal failure, chronic lung disease, and Glasgow Coma Scale, were identified as risk factors for mortality. Scoring tools like Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, CURB-65 score, and Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) score showed associations with mortality. Lastly, certain treatment protocols, such as vasoactive agent use, vasopressor use, and mechanical ventilation, were found to increase the risk of mortality, while invasive mechanical ventilation and the use of remdesivir and steroids had a positive impact on prognosis. These findings provide valuable insights for clinicians in predicting and managing severe pneumonia outcomes.
CONCLUSION
This most comprehensive review identified 53 unique prognostic factors of severe pneumonia, which provided a reference for subsequent researchers to construct models to predict clinical outcomes in patients with severe pneumonia for clinical use. By identifying prognostic factors through multivariate analysis, healthcare providers can better assess the severity and prognosis of individual patients. This knowledge can aid in treatment planning, resource allocation, and determining the appropriate level of care for patients with severe pneumonia. Additionally, understanding the prognostic factors can help identify high-risk patients who may require more intensive monitoring or interventions. Overall, this study provides valuable insights that can inform clinical practice and improve patient outcomes in the management of severe pneumonia.
PubMed: 37971449
DOI: No ID Found -
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics 2023To describe the existing pharmacological managements for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) in a systematic way, to identify the available... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
To describe the existing pharmacological managements for Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) in a systematic way, to identify the available pharmacological managements in MIS-C, evaluate its safety and efficacy and identify the best treatment procedures for practice recommendation.
METHODS
A systematic search using six databases was conducted on August 18, 2021, updated in January 26th 2023. Terminologies that were used in this search are children, MIS-C/PIMS and SARS-CoV-2. A PRISMA flow diagram was used to report the study selection process. Quality analysis was done based on NOS and GRADE tools. Data synthesis was conducted by extracting the information on drugs used, efficacy and side effects.
RESULTS
From the 32 articles included, a total of 2331 children with MIS-C were studied. The main pharmacological approaches were immunomodulatory therapy, i.e., intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) (77.3%), steroids (60.5%), and a combination of IVIG and steroids (41.3%). IVIG and steroids were found to be potentially effective and safe treatments for MIS-C. Combination of IVIG and steroids was found favorable in severe cases with higher recovery rate. Refractory treatments include second dose of initial treatment and biological response modifier drugs like anakinra, tocilizumab, infliximab. A small number of studies investigating supportive treatment consisted of vasoactive, inotropic and anticoagulation. The mortality rate was 1.28% and only three studies reported side effects from the treatment. Evidence of outcome from GRADE were mostly at moderate, low and very low levels.
CONCLUSIONS
This review provides preliminary evidence to support the current standard treatment practices in managing MIS-C pharmacologically. However, comprehensive investigation is required using clinical trials to provide stronger outcome evidence.
Topics: Child; Humans; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Steroids
PubMed: 37853964
DOI: 10.24953/turkjped.2022.765 -
Frontiers in Neuroscience 2023Post-stroke constipation (PSC) is a common complication of strokes that seriously affects the recovery and quality of life of patients, and effective treatments are...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Post-stroke constipation (PSC) is a common complication of strokes that seriously affects the recovery and quality of life of patients, and effective treatments are needed. Acupuncture is a viable treatment option, but current evidence is insufficient to support its efficacy and safety. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of PSC.
METHODS
A systematic search of eight databases was conducted to identify PSC-related randomized clinical trials from the inception of each database through May 2023. Methodological quality assessment was conducted by RoB 2.0, meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.1, and evidence quality was evaluated by GRADE. Moreover, reporting quality of acupuncture interventions was assessed using the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA).
RESULTS
Thirty RCTs involving 2,220 patients were identified. We found that acupuncture was superior to conventional treatment (CT) in improving total responder rate [risk ratio (): 1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09 to 1.25, < 0.0001], decreasing constipation symptom scores [standardized mean difference (): -0.65, 95% CI: -0.83 to -0.46, < 0.00001], increasing serum P substance (SP) levels (: 1.92, 95% CI: 0.47 to 3.36, = 0.009), reducing the time to first bowel movement (BM) (: -1.19, 95% CI: -2.13 to -0.25, = 0.01), and lowing serum vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) levels (: -2.11, 95% CI: -3.83 to -0.38, = 0.02). Furthermore, acupuncture plus CT was superior regarding total responder rate (: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.35, < 0.00001), serum SP levels (: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.65-2.35, < 0.00001), time to first BM (: -2.08, 95% CI: -2.44 to -1.71, < 0.00001), and serum VIP levels (: -1.71, 95% CI: -2.24 to -1.18, < 0.00001). However, regarding Bristol Stool Scale (BSS) score, acupuncture plus CT was superior to CT (: -2.48, 95% CI: -3.22 to -1.73, < 0.00001), while there was no statistically significant difference between acupuncture and CT (: 0.28, 95% CI: -0.02 to 0.58, = 0.07). Acupuncture causes fewer AEs than CT (: 0.13, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.26, < 0.00001), though there was no statistically significant difference between acupuncture plus CT vs. CT (: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.60 to 2.84, = 0.51).
CONCLUSION
Acupuncture may be an effective and safe therapy for PSC. However, given the inferior quality of clinical data, additional well-designed RCTs are required to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 37822350
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1275452 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Oct 2023Portal hypertension, a major complication of chronic liver disease, often leads to life-threatening variceal bleeding, managed effectively with vasoactive drugs like... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Portal hypertension, a major complication of chronic liver disease, often leads to life-threatening variceal bleeding, managed effectively with vasoactive drugs like terlipressin. However, the most optimal method of terlipressin administration, continuous versus intermittent infusion, remains a subject of debate, necessitating this systematic review and meta-analysis for evidence-based decision-making in managing this critical condition.
METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA standards and explored multiple databases until 6 April 2023, such as MEDLINE through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL. Independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met specific inclusion criteria. After assessing study quality and extracting necessary data, statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan), with results presented as risk ratios (RR) or mean differences.
RESULTS
Five RCTs (=395 patients) were included. The continuous terlipressin group had a significantly lower risk of rebleeding (RR=0.43, =0.0004) and treatment failure (RR=0.22, =0.02) and fewer total adverse effects (RR=0.52, <0.00001) compared to the intermittent group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in mean arterial pressure (=0.26), length of hospital stays (=0.78), and mortality rates (=0.65).
CONCLUSION
This study provides robust evidence suggesting that continuous terlipressin infusion may be superior to intermittent infusions in reducing the risk of rebleeding, treatment failure, and adverse effects in patients with portal hypertension. However, further large-scale, high-quality RCTs are required to confirm these findings and to investigate the potential benefits of continuous terlipressin infusion on mortality and hospital stays.
PubMed: 37811089
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001261 -
Shock (Augusta, Ga.) Dec 2023Background: Septic shock is a distributive shock with decreased systemic vascular resistance and MAP. Septic shock contributes to the most common causes of death in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Background: Septic shock is a distributive shock with decreased systemic vascular resistance and MAP. Septic shock contributes to the most common causes of death in the intensive care unit (ICU). Current guidelines recommend the use of norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor, whereas adrenergic agonists and vasopressin analogs are also commonly used by physicians. To date, very few studies have synthetically compared the effects of multiple types of vasoactive medications. The aim of this study was to systemically evaluate the efficacy of vasoactive agents both individually and in combination to treat septic shock. Methods: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to May 12, 2022, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. A network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of different types of vasopressors. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was the ICU length of stay. Adverse events are defined as any undesirable outcomes, including myocardial infarction, cardiac arrhythmia, peripheral ischemia, or stroke and cerebrovascular events. Findings: Thirty-three randomized controlled trials comprising 4,966 patients and assessing 8 types of vasoactive treatments were included in the network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve provided a ranking of vasoactive medications in terms of 28-day all-cause mortality from most effective to least effective: norepinephrine plus dobutamine, epinephrine, vasopressin, terlipressin, norepinephrine, norepinephrine plus vasopressin, dopamine, and dobutamine. Dopamine was associated with a significantly shorter ICU stay than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin, whereas other vasoactive medications showed no definite difference in ICU length of stay. Regarding adverse events, norepinephrine was associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Dopamine was associated with the highest incidence of cardiac arrhythmia. Epinephrine and terlipressin were associated with the highest incidences of myocardial infarction and peripheral ischemia. Interpretation: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that norepinephrine plus dobutamine is associated with a lower risk of 28-day mortality in septic shock patients than other vasoactive medications, and the use of dopamine is associated with a higher risk of 28-day mortality due to septic shock than norepinephrine, terlipressin, and vasopressin.
Topics: Humans; Shock, Septic; Dopamine; Terlipressin; Dobutamine; Network Meta-Analysis; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Epinephrine; Norepinephrine; Vasopressins; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Ischemia; Myocardial Infarction
PubMed: 37548686
DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002193 -
Transplantation Apr 2024We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analyses evaluating the effects of different intraoperative vasoactive drugs on acute kidney injury (AKI) and other... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analyses evaluating the effects of different intraoperative vasoactive drugs on acute kidney injury (AKI) and other perioperative outcomes in adult liver transplant recipients. We searched multiple electronic databases using words from the "liver transplantation" and "vasoactive drug" domains. We included all randomized controlled trials conducted in adult liver transplant recipients comparing 2 different intravenous vasoactive drugs or 1 against a standard of care that reported AKI, intraoperative blood loss, or any other postoperative outcome. We conducted 4 frequentist network meta-analyses using random effect models, based on the interventions' mechanism of action, and evaluated the quality of evidence (QoE) using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations recommendations. We included 9 randomized controlled trials comparing different vasopressor drugs (vasoconstrictor or inotrope), 3 comparing a somatostatin infusion (or its analogues) to a standard of care, 11 comparing different vasodilator infusions together or against a standard of care, and 2 comparing vasoconstrictor boluses at graft reperfusion. Intravenous clonidine was associated with shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit, and hospital length of stay (very low QoE), and some vasodilators were associated with lower creatinine level 24 h after surgery (low to very low QoE). Phenylephrine and terlipressin were associated with less intraoperative blood loss when compared with norepinephrine (low and moderate QoE). None of the vasoactive drugs improve any other postoperative outcomes, including AKI. There is still important equipoise regarding the best vasoactive drug to use in liver transplantation for most outcomes. Further studies are required to better inform clinical practice.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Blood Loss, Surgical; Network Meta-Analysis; Vasoconstrictor Agents; Vasodilator Agents; Acute Kidney Injury
PubMed: 37525360
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004744