-
Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018Clozapine is the antipsychotic of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia and has minimal risk for extrapyramidal symptoms. Therapeutic benefits, however, are...
Clozapine is the antipsychotic of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia and has minimal risk for extrapyramidal symptoms. Therapeutic benefits, however, are accompanied by a myriad of cardiometabolic side-effects. The specific reasons for clozapine's high propensity to cause adverse cardiometabolic events remain unknown, but it is believed that autonomic dysfunction may play a role in many of these. This systematic review summarizes the literature on autonomic dysfunction and related cardiovascular side effects associated with clozapine treatment. A search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and EBM Cochrane databases was conducted using the search terms antipsychotic agents, antipsychotic drug, antipsychotic, schizophrenia, schizophren, psychos, psychotic, mental ill, mental disorder, neuroleptic, cardiovascular, cardiovascular diseases, clozapine, clozaril, autonomic, sympathetic, catecholamine, norepinephrine, noradrenaline, epinephrine, adrenaline. The search yielded 37 studies that were reviewed, of which only 16 studies have used interventions to manage cardiovascular side effects. Side effects reported in the studies include myocarditis, orthostatic hypotension and tachycardia. These were attributed to sympathetic hyperactivity, decreased vagal contribution, blockade of cholinergic and adrenergic receptors, reduced heart rate variability and elevated catecholamines with clozapine use. Autonomic neuropathy was identified by monitoring blood pressure and heart rate changes in response to stimuli and by spectral analysis of heart rate variability. Metoprolol, lorazepam, atenolol, propranolol, amlodipine, vasopressin and norepinephrine infusion were used to treat tachycardia and fluctuations in blood pressure, yet results were limited to case reports. The results indicate there is a lack of clinical studies investigating autonomic dysfunction and a limited use of interventions to manage cardiovascular side effects associated with clozapine. As there is often no alternative treatment for refractory schizophrenia, the current review highlights the need for better designed studies, use of autonomic tests for prevention of cardiovascular disease and development of novel interventions for clozapine-induced side effects.
PubMed: 29670504
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00203 -
Clinical Endocrinology Jun 2017International and national guidelines on the treatment of chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia differ; therefore, we have undertaken this systematic review... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
International and national guidelines on the treatment of chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia differ; therefore, we have undertaken this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of interventions for the treatment of chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia. Following registration of the review protocol with PROSPERO, systematic literature searches were conducted to identify randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials assessing any degree of fluid restriction or any drug treatment with the aim of increasing serum sodium concentration in patients with chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia. Where appropriate, outcome data were synthesized in a meta-analysis. A total of 45 716 bibliographic records were identified from the searches and 18 trials (assessing conivaptan, lixivaptan, tolvaptan and satavaptan) met the eligibility criteria. Results suggest that all four vasopressin receptor agonists ("vaptans") significantly improve serum sodium concentration. Lixivaptan, satavaptan and tolvaptan were associated with greater rates of response versus placebo. There was no evidence of a difference between each of the vaptans compared with placebo for mortality, discontinuation and rates of hypernatraemia. No RCT evidence of treatments other than the vaptans for hyponatraemia such as oral urea, salt tablets, mannitol, loop diuretics demeclocycline or lithium was identified. Vaptans demonstrated superiority over placebo for outcomes relating to serum sodium correction. Few trials documented the potential benefit of vaptans on change in health-related quality of life as a result of treatment. There was also a lack of high-quality RCT evidence on the comparative efficacy of the vaptans and other treatment strategies for the treatment of chronic nonhypovolaemic hypotonic hyponatraemia.
Topics: Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists; Benzamides; Benzazepines; Humans; Hyponatremia; Morpholines; Osmotic Pressure; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Vasopressin; Spiro Compounds; Tolvaptan
PubMed: 28214374
DOI: 10.1111/cen.13315 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2016People with thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow failure are vulnerable to bleeding. Platelet transfusions have limited efficacy in this setting and alternative agents... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Alternative agents to prophylactic platelet transfusion for preventing bleeding in people with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND
People with thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow failure are vulnerable to bleeding. Platelet transfusions have limited efficacy in this setting and alternative agents that could replace, or reduce platelet transfusion, and are effective at reducing bleeding are needed.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the relative efficacy of different interventions for patients with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure and to derive a hierarchy of potential alternative treatments to platelet transfusions.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (the Cochrane Library 2016, Issue 3), MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1937), the Transfusion Evidence Library (from 1980) and ongoing trial databases to 27 April 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials in people with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure who were allocated to either an alternative to platelet transfusion (artificial platelet substitutes, platelet-poor plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), desmopressin (DDAVP), recombinant factor XIII (rFXIII), recombinant interleukin (rIL)6 or rIL11, or thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics) or a comparator (placebo, standard of care or platelet transfusion). We excluded people undergoing intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transfusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened search results, extracted data and assessed trial quality. We estimated summary risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We planned to use summary mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. All summary measures are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI).We could not perform a network meta-analysis because the included studies had important differences in the baseline severity of disease for the participants and in the number of participants undergoing chemotherapy. This raised important concerns about the plausibility of the transitivity assumption in the final dataset and we could not evaluate transitivity statistically because of the small number of trials per comparison. Therefore, we could only perform direct pairwise meta-analyses of included interventions.We employed a random-effects model for all analyses. We assessed statistical heterogeneity using the I statistic and its 95% CI. The risk of bias of each study included was assessed using the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methods.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified seven completed trials (472 participants), and four ongoing trials (recruiting 837 participants) which are due to be completed by December 2020. Of the seven completed trials, five trials (456 participants) compared a TPO mimetic versus placebo (four romiplostim trials, and one eltrombopag trial), one trial (eight participants) compared DDAVP with placebo and one trial (eight participants) compared tranexamic acid with placebo. In the DDAVP trial, the only outcome reported was the bleeding time. In the tranexamic acid trial there were methodological flaws and bleeding definitions were subject to significant bias. Consequently, these trials could not be incorporated into the quantitative synthesis. No randomised trial of artificial platelet substitutes, platelet-poor plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, rFVIIa, rFXIII, rIL6 or rIL11 was identified.We assessed all five trials of TPO mimetics included in this review to be at high risk of bias because the trials were funded by the manufacturers of the TPO mimetics and the authors had financial stakes in the sponsoring companies.The GRADE quality of the evidence was very low to moderate across the different outcomes.There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in the number of participants with at least one bleeding episode between TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.31, four trials, 206 participants, low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in the risk of a life-threatening bleed between those treated with a TPO mimetic and placebo (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.26, one trial, 39 participants, low-quality evidence).There was insufficient evidence to detect a difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between those treated with a TPO mimetic and placebo (RR 0.74, 95%CI 0.52 to 1.05, five trials, 456 participants, very low-quality evidence).There was a significant reduction in the number of participants receiving any platelet transfusion between those treated with TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.95, four trials, 206 participants, moderate-quality evidence).There was no evidence for a difference in the incidence of transfusion reactions between those treated with TPO mimetics and placebo (pOR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 3.44, one trial, 98 participants, very low-quality evidence).There was no evidence for a difference in thromboembolic events between TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 1.41, 95%CI 0.39 to 5.01, five trials, 456 participants, very-low quality evidence).There was no evidence for a difference in drug reactions between TPO mimetics and placebo (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.51, five trials, 455 participants, low-quality evidence).No trial reported the number of days of bleeding per participant, platelet transfusion episodes, mean red cell transfusions per participant, red cell transfusion episodes, transfusion-transmitted infections, formation of antiplatelet antibodies or platelet refractoriness.In order to demonstrate a reduction in bleeding events from 26 in 100 to 16 in 100 participants, a study would need to recruit 514 participants (80% power, 5% significance).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence at present for thrombopoietin (TPO) mimetics for the prevention of bleeding for people with thrombocytopenia due to chronic bone marrow failure. There is no randomised controlled trial evidence for artificial platelet substitutes, platelet-poor plasma, fibrinogen concentrate, rFVIIa, rFXIII or rIL6 or rIL11, antifibrinolytics or DDAVP in this setting.
Topics: Benzoates; Bone Marrow Diseases; Chronic Disease; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Hemorrhage; Hemostatics; Humans; Hydrazines; Platelet Transfusion; Pyrazoles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Fc; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombopoietin; Tranexamic Acid
PubMed: 27797129
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012055.pub2 -
International Urology and Nephrology Nov 2016Lithium is an essential treatment in bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant depression; however, its use has been limited by concerns regarding its renal adverse... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Lithium is an essential treatment in bipolar disorder and treatment-resistant depression; however, its use has been limited by concerns regarding its renal adverse effects. An improved understanding of potential molecular mechanisms can help develop prevention and treatment strategies for lithium-associated renal disease.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, and PsychINFO including English-language original research articles published prior to November 2015 that specifically investigated lithium's effects on nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (NDI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), using molecular markers.
RESULTS
From a total of 3510 records, 71 pre-clinical studies and two relevant clinical studies were identified. Molecular alterations were reported in calcium signaling, inositol monophosphate, extracellular-regulated, prostaglandin, sodium/solute transport, G-protein-coupled receptors, nitric oxide, vasopressin/aquaporin, and inflammation-related pathways in lithium-associated renal disease. The majority of studies found that these mechanisms were implicated in NDI, while few studies had examined CKD.
DISCUSSION
Future studies will have to focus on (1) validating the present findings in human subjects and (2) examining CKD, which is the most clinically relevant lithium-associated renal effect. This will improve our understanding of lithium's biological effects, as well as inform a personalized medicine approach, which could lead to safer lithium prescribing and less renal adverse events.
Topics: Animals; Aquaporins; Calcium; Diabetes Insipidus, Nephrogenic; Humans; Lithium; Prostaglandins; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Signal Transduction; Sodium; Symporters; Vasopressins
PubMed: 27357223
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1352-6 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology Sep 2016The vasopressin type 2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan (TLV) is available to treat congestion in patients with heart failure. However, there is paucity of evidence guiding... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The vasopressin type 2 receptor antagonist tolvaptan (TLV) is available to treat congestion in patients with heart failure. However, there is paucity of evidence guiding its use, and lack of evidence of its long-term efficacy. Our objectives are to perform a systematic review of studies examining the effects of TLV in patients with heart failure; and a quantitative meta-analysis comparing primary and secondary outcomes between TLV and placebo. Only double-blinded randomized controlled trials, with no restriction on the language or the time of publication, were included. Our main outcome measures were all-cause mortality, change in body weight, change in urine volume, and change in serum sodium. Extracted summary estimates included mean difference and SD for change in body weight, change in urine volume and change in serum sodium levels, and hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval for all-cause mortality. We found 8 double-blinded randomized controlled trials, seven of which were included in this meta-analysis. Assessment of risk of bias was conducted by investigating random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of outcome data, and potential for selective reporting. We found no evidence of significant bias. TLV showed benefits in reducing body weight, increasing urine volume, and increasing serum sodium. No reduction in mortality was detected. However, the subgroup of patients with hyponatremia might have better mortality outcome with TLV. TLV seemed to be safe, as it did not cause worsening of the renal function or hypotension. In conclusion, a meta-analysis of the published literature suggests short-term benefits of TLV. However, the impact on mortality is inconclusive.
Topics: Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists; Benzazepines; Body Weight; Heart Failure; Humans; Mortality; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tolvaptan
PubMed: 27159621
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000405 -
World Journal of Hepatology Feb 2016To describe the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history, and therapy of portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) based on a systematic literature review.
AIM
To describe the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, natural history, and therapy of portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) based on a systematic literature review.
METHODS
Computerized search of the literature was performed via PubMed using the following medical subject headings or keywords: "portal" and "gastropathy"; or "portal" and "hypertensive"; or "congestive" and "gastropathy"; or "congestive" and "gastroenteropathy". The following criteria were applied for study inclusion: Publication in peer-reviewed journals, and publication since 1980. Articles were independently evaluated by each author and selected for inclusion by consensus after discussion based on the following criteria: Well-designed, prospective trials; recent studies; large study populations; and study emphasis on PHG.
RESULTS
PHG is diagnosed by characteristic endoscopic findings of small polygonal areas of variable erythema surrounded by a pale, reticular border in a mosaic pattern in the gastric fundus/body in a patient with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Histologic findings include capillary and venule dilatation, congestion, and tortuosity, without vascular fibrin thrombi or inflammatory cells in gastric submucosa. PHG is differentiated from gastric antral vascular ectasia by a different endoscopic appearance. The etiology of PHG is inadequately understood. Portal hypertension is necessary but insufficient to develop PHG because many patients have portal hypertension without PHG. PHG increases in frequency with more severe portal hypertension, advanced liver disease, longer liver disease duration, presence of esophageal varices, and endoscopic variceal obliteration. PHG pathogenesis is related to a hyperdynamic circulation, induced by portal hypertension, characterized by increased intrahepatic resistance to flow, increased splanchnic flow, increased total gastric flow, and most likely decreased gastric mucosal flow. Gastric mucosa in PHG shows increased susceptibility to gastrotoxic chemicals and poor wound healing. Nitrous oxide, free radicals, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and glucagon may contribute to PHG development. Acute and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding are the only clinical complications. Bleeding is typically mild-to-moderate. Endoscopic therapy is rarely useful because the bleeding is typically diffuse. Acute bleeding is primarily treated with octreotide, often with concomitant proton pump inhibitor therapy, or secondarily treated with vasopressin or terlipressin. Nonselective β-adrenergic receptor antagonists, particularly propranolol, are used to prevent bleeding after an acute episode or for chronic bleeding. Iron deficiency anemia from chronic bleeding may require iron replacement therapy. Transjugular-intrahepatic-portosystemic-shunt and liver transplantation are highly successful ultimate therapies because they reduce the underlying portal hypertension.
CONCLUSION
PHG is important to recognize in patients with cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic portal hypertension because it can cause acute or chronic GI bleeding that often requires pharmacologic therapy.
PubMed: 26855694
DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i4.231 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2015Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited disorder causing kidney disease. Current clinical management of ADPKD focuses primarily... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited disorder causing kidney disease. Current clinical management of ADPKD focuses primarily on symptom control and reducing associated complications, particularly hypertension. In recent years, improved understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in kidney cyst growth and disease progression has resulted in new pharmaceutical agents to target disease pathogenesis to prevent progressive disease.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to evaluate the effects of interventions for preventing ADPKD progression on kidney function, kidney endpoints, kidney structure, patient-centred endpoints (such as cardiovascular events, sudden death, all-cause mortality, hospitalisations, BP control, quality of life, and kidney pain), as well as the general and specific adverse effects related to their use.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 6 June 2015 using relevant search terms.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any interventions for preventing the progression of ADPKD with other interventions or placebo were considered for inclusion without language restriction.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed study risks of bias and extracted data. We summarised treatment effects on clinical outcomes, kidney function and structure and adverse events using random effects meta-analysis. We assessed heterogeneity in estimated treatment effects using the Cochran Q test and I(2) statistic. Summary treatment estimates were calculated as a mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes and a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with their 95% confidence intervals.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 30 studies (2039 participants) that investigated 11 pharmacological interventions (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers, beta blockers, vasopressin receptor 2 (V2R) antagonists, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, somatostatin analogues, antiplatelet agents, eicosapentaenoic acids, statins and vitamin D compounds) in this review.ACEi significantly reduced diastolic blood pressure (9 studies, 278 participants: MD -4.96 mm Hg, 95% CI -8.88 to -1.04), but had uncertain effects on kidney volumes (MD -42.50 mL, 95% CI -115.68 to 30.67), GFR (MD -3.41 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 95% CI -15.83 to 9.01), and SCr (MD -0.02 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.09), in data largely restricted to children. ACEi did not show different effects on GFR (MD -8.19 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 95% CI -29.46 to 13.07) and albuminuria (SMD -0.19, 95% CI -1.77 to 1.39) when compared with beta-blockers, or SCr (MD 0.00 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.10) when compared with ARBs.Data for effects of V2R antagonists on kidney function and volumes compared to placebo were limited to narrative information within a single study while these agents increased thirst (1444 participants: RR 2.70, 95% CI 2.24 to 3.24) and dry mouth (1455 participants: RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.76).Compared with no treatment, mTOR inhibitors had uncertain effects on kidney function (2 studies, 115 participants: MD 4.45 mL/min/1.73 m(2), 95% CI -3.20 to 12.11) and kidney volume (MD -0.08 L, 95% CI -0.75 to 0.59) but in three studies (560 participants) caused angioedema (RR 13.39, 95% CI 2.56 to 70.00), oral ulceration (RR 6.77, 95% CI 4.42 to 10.38), infections (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.25) and diarrhoea (RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.29).Somatostatin analogues (6 studies, 138 participants) slightly improved SCr (MD -0.43 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.01) and total kidney volume (MD -0.62 L, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.01) but had no definite effects on GFR (MD 9.50 mL/min, 95% CI -4.45 to 23.44) and caused diarrhoea (RR 3.72, 95% CI 1.43 to 9.68).Data for calcium channel blockers, eicosapentaenoic acids, statins, vitamin D compounds and antiplatelet agents were sparse and inconclusive.Random sequence generation was adequate in eight studies, and in almost half of the studies, blinding was not present or not specified. Most studies did not adequately report outcomes, which adversely affected our ability to assess this bias. The overall drop-out rate was over 10% in nine studies, and few were conducted using intention-to-treat analyses.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although several interventions are available for patients with ADPKD, at present there is little or no evidence that treatment improves patient outcomes in this population and is associated with frequent adverse effects. Additional large randomised studies focused on patient-centred outcomes are needed.
Topics: Adult; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists; Child; Disease Progression; Eicosapentaenoic Acid; Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 26171904
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010294.pub2 -
International Urology and Nephrology Feb 2015Elevated vasopressin may increase systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, subsequently decrease stroke volume and cardiac output.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
Elevated vasopressin may increase systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, subsequently decrease stroke volume and cardiac output. Vasopressin receptor antagonists may counteract these effects and improve outcomes in heart failure. We aimed to assess benefits and harms of vasopressin receptor antagonists (VRAs) versus placebo in addition to standard care in adults with heart failure (HF).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with searches of CENTRAL and MEDLINE to January 2014 and reference lists without language restriction. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was done for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, changes in clinical assessment of HF, serum sodium concentration (Na), kidney function and treatment-specific side effects.
RESULTS
We identified 13 trials and 5,525 participants. In 10 trials, participants received standard therapy for HF. In low-quality evidence, VRAs in patients with HF had no effect on all-cause mortality risk ratios (RR 0.98; CI 0.88-1.08), cardiovascular mortality (RR 1.03; CI 0.91-1.16) or change in creatinine mean difference (MD -0.01; CI -0.10 to 0.09 mg/dL), but reduced body weight by 0.8 kg from baseline (MD -0.83; CI -1.10 to -0.55 kg) and increased Na (MD 2.61; 95 % CI 1.88-3.35 mmol/L). Compared with placebo, VRAs increased the risk of adverse events by 14 % (RR 1.14; CI 1.04-1.26). Studies were generally limited to short-term follow-up with limited data available on patient important outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Vasopressin receptors antagonists may reduce body weight and increase Na but do not improve all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or kidney function. In addition, acceptability of long-term treatment side effects and hospitalization appears problematic.
Topics: Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists; Body Weight; Cause of Death; Creatinine; Heart Failure; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium
PubMed: 25281314
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0855-2 -
Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) Apr 2014Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a monogenetic disorder that leads to kidney failure. Our aim was to undertake a meta-analysis of randomized... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a monogenetic disorder that leads to kidney failure. Our aim was to undertake a meta-analysis of randomized trials of interventions that have been hypothesized to reduce the progression of total kidney volume (TKV) and renal function in ADPKD.
METHODS
Relevant trials were identified, and outcomes were: change in TKV, total cyst volume (TCV), renal function and adverse events. Meta-analysis used random effects, with results expressed as mean difference and risk ratio both with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
RESULTS
Eleven trials (2262 patients) were included. Compared with placebo, Target of Rapamycin complex 1 (TORC1) inhibitors (5 trials, n = 619), showed no significant change in TKV (P = 0.21), TCV (P = 0.06) or eGFR (P = 0.22). Somatostatin analogues (3 trials, n = 157) reduced TKV by 9% (95% CI -10.33 to -7.58%) but did not alter eGFR. The vasopressin receptor antagonist (n = 1455) attenuated TKV increase to 3%/year (95% CI -3.48 to -2.52) and slowed kidney function decline over a 3-year period. A single trial (n = 41) of eicosapentaenoic acid did not alter the progression of either TKV (P = 0.9) or renal dysfunction (P = 0.78). Adverse events were significant for interventions in all trials compared with placebo.
CONCLUSION
These data suggest that somatostatin analogues and vasopressin receptor antagonists attenuate TKV increase. The neutral effects of TORC1 inhibitors on TKV could be true, or due to heterogeneity in study population, drug efficacy and follow-up duration. In the future, further well-designed and powered trials of longer duration using new biomarkers or therapeutic agents with better tolerance are required.
Topics: Disease Progression; Humans; Kidney; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Polycystic Kidney, Autosomal Dominant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urological Agents
PubMed: 24460701
DOI: 10.1111/nep.12211 -
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics Oct 2012Vaptans may correct hyponatraemia and mobilise ascites through an increased excretion of water. The effect on clinical outcomes is debated. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vaptans may correct hyponatraemia and mobilise ascites through an increased excretion of water. The effect on clinical outcomes is debated.
AIM
To determine the effects of vaptans (tolvaptan, satavaptan and lixivaptan) on patients with cirrhosis and hyponatraemia or ascites.
METHODS
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. The primary outcome measure was mortality. Electronic and manual searches were combined (April 2012). Data were extracted from published reports, online information from the Food and Drug Administration website or obtained through correspondence with authors and pharmaceutical companies. The primary meta-analyses were performed using random effects models due to an expected clinical diversity.
RESULTS
Twelve trials with a total of 2266 patients were included. Randomisation was adequate in all trials. Eight trials were double-blind. Random effects meta-analyses found no clear differences between vaptans and control groups regarding mortality (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.90-1.26, I(2) = 0%), variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, or renal failure. Vaptans increased serum sodium levels (WMD = 1.8 mmol/L, 95% CI = 0.79-2.96) and lead to reductions in weight and the time to the first paracentesis. Vaptans increased the risk of adverse events (RR = 3.97, 95% CI = 1.78-8.83), including an excessive urine volume (RR = 9.96, 95% CI = 1.38-71.68).
CONCLUSIONS
Vaptans have a small beneficial effect on hyponatraemia and ascites, but do not affect mortality, complications to cirrhosis or renal failure. The data do not support the routine use of vaptans in cirrhosis.
Topics: Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists; Ascites; Benzamides; Benzazepines; Humans; Hyponatremia; Liver Cirrhosis; Morpholines; Pyrroles; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Vasopressin; Sodium; Spiro Compounds; Tolvaptan; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22908905
DOI: 10.1111/apt.12025