-
Microbial Pathogenesis Nov 2022Vibrio cholera (V. cholera) is a facultative pathogen that colonizes the small intestine and produces cholerae toxin as the primary virulence factor that causes cholera... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Vibrio cholera (V. cholera) is a facultative pathogen that colonizes the small intestine and produces cholerae toxin as the primary virulence factor that causes cholera and fatal diarrhea in humans. In recent decades, V. cholera has emerged as a notorious multidrug-resistant enteric pathogen. This meta-analysis estimated the pooled proportion of V. cholera antimicrobial resistance against RNA and DNA effective antibiotics.
METHOD
A systematic search was performed for relevant literature until 05 June 2021 in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was performed to estimate weighted pooled resistance (WPR).
RESULTS
The meta-analysis were included 164 articles. The WPR of V. cholera were as follows 76% [67,84] to furazolidone, 65% [29,94] to nitrofurantoin, 55% [44,66] to nalidixic acid, 10% [2,23] to rifampicin, 4%(0, 12) to novobiocin, 4% [2,6] to norfloxacin, 3% [1,4] to ciprofloxacin, 1%(0, 3) to sparofloxacin, 0%(0, 3) to levofloxacin, 0%(0, 2) to ofloxacin, 0%(0, 0) to gatifloxacin.
CONCLUSION
V. cholera is a severe problem in Asia and Africa, especially in South Asian countries. The resistance patterns are various in geographical regions. novobiocin 0% (0, 0), and ofloxacin 0% (0, 1) in Africa, gatifloxacin 0% (0, 0), and levofloxacin 0% (0, 6) in Asia and ciprofloxacin 0% (0, 2) in North America are most effective antibiotis. The resistance rate to furazolidone, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantoin, and cephalothin has increased over the years. Monitoring antibiotic resistance and prescribing an appropriate antibiotic is vital to control resistance.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalothin; Cholera; Cholera Toxin; Ciprofloxacin; Furazolidone; Gatifloxacin; Levofloxacin; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Nalidixic Acid; Nitrofurantoin; Norfloxacin; Novobiocin; Rifampin; Vibrio cholerae; Virulence Factors; Drug Resistance, Bacterial
PubMed: 35537594
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105514 -
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection... Apr 2022Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Vibrio cholerae O1/O139 were the predominant circulating serogroups exhibiting multi-drug resistance (MDR) during the cholera outbreak which led to cholera treatment failures.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the weighted pooled resistance (WPR) rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates obtained from environmental samples.
METHODS
We systematically searched the articles in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (until January 2020). Subgroup analyses were then employed by publication year, geographic areas, and the quality of studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software (ver. 14.0).
RESULTS
A total of 20 studies investigating 648 environmental V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates were analysed. The majority of the studies were originated from Asia (n = 9). In addition, a large number of studies (n = 15 i.e. 71.4%) included in the meta-analysis revealed the resistance to cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. The WPR rates were as follows: cotrimoxazole 59%, erythromycin 28%, tetracycline 14%, doxycycline 5%, and ciprofloxacin 0%. There was increased resistance to nalidixic acid, cotrimoxazole, furazolidone, and tetracycline while a decreased resistance to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, chloramphenicol, ampicillin, streptomycin, and ceftriaxone was observed during the years 2000-2020. A significant decrease in the doxycycline and ciprofloxacin-resistance rates in V. cholerae O1/O139 isolates was reported over the years 2011-2020 which represents a decrease in 2001-2010 (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Fluoroquinolones, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, doxycycline, kanamycin, and cefotaxime showed the highest effectiveness and the lowest resistance rate. However, the main interest is the rise of antimicrobial resistance in V. cholerae strains especially in low-income countries or endemic areas, and therefore, continuous surveillance, careful appropriate AST, and limitation on improper antibiotic usage are crucial.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Ceftriaxone; Cholera; Ciprofloxacin; Doxycycline; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Erythromycin; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Vibrio cholerae O1; Vibrio cholerae O139
PubMed: 35468830
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-022-01100-3 -
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Oct 2022Vibriosis disease is a major threat to the aquaculture industry caused by Vibrio spp. that are often resistant to antibiotics. Alternative controlling measures such as... (Review)
Review
Vibriosis disease is a major threat to the aquaculture industry caused by Vibrio spp. that are often resistant to antibiotics. Alternative controlling measures such as bacteriocins could be effective due to their narrow-spectrum activity. Hence, this systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out to review the feasibility of Vibrio spp. and their vibriocins to be used as a vibriosis control measure in aquaculture. A literature search using the web of science (WOS) and SCOPUS databases resulted in 42 unique articles which were reviewed. The results showed that Vibrio spp. could be used as a probiotic to control vibriosis, but not recommended due to their opportunistic nature and pathogenesis. Vibriocin showed narrow-spectrum activity against Vibrio spp. including highly pathogenic strains such as V. alginolyticus, V. harveyi, and V. parahaemolyticus. This supported this review's hypothesis of using vibriocin as a targeted vibriosis control measure. Vibrio cholerae was the most studied and showed the highest inhibition range, inhibiting 13 different vibrio and non-vibrio species. Various innovations were reported in the field and vibriocins can now be produced on large scales using whole-cell culture. Vibriocins were structurally diverse, large molecular weight, and relatively heat stable. These vibriocins mainly inhibited the cell wall but could have other novel mechanisms. These properties could affect the extraction process as well as applications in aquaculture, hence, should be considered in future research.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aquaculture; Bacteriocins; Humans; Vibrio; Vibrio Infections
PubMed: 35451794
DOI: 10.1007/s12010-022-03919-3 -
Annual Review of Microbiology Oct 2021Most bacteria are protected from environmental offenses by a cell wall consisting of strong yet elastic peptidoglycan. The cell wall is essential for preserving... (Review)
Review
Most bacteria are protected from environmental offenses by a cell wall consisting of strong yet elastic peptidoglycan. The cell wall is essential for preserving bacterial morphology and viability, and thus the enzymes involved in the production and turnover of peptidoglycan have become preferred targets for many of our most successful antibiotics. In the past decades, , the gram-negative pathogen causing the diarrheal disease cholera, has become a major model for understanding cell wall genetics, biochemistry, and physiology. More than 100 articles have shed light on novel cell wall genetic determinants, regulatory links, and adaptive mechanisms. Here we provide the first comprehensive review of 's cell wall biology and genetics. Special emphasis is placed on the similarities and differences with , the paradigm for understanding cell wall metabolism and chemical structure in gram-negative bacteria.
Topics: Biology; Cell Wall; Escherichia coli; Peptidoglycan; Vibrio cholerae
PubMed: 34623898
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-040621-122027 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Feb 2022Cholera is an acute diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 or O139. Cholera rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used to screen for cholera cases. However,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cholera is an acute diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 or O139. Cholera rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are widely used to screen for cholera cases. However, their accuracy has not been systematically reviewed.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cholera RDTs.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Medline, EMBASE and Web of science through to November 2020; references of included studies and a technical guidance on cholera RDTs. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021233124).
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Cross-sectional studies comparing the performance of cholera RDTs either to stool culture or PCR.
PARTICIPANTS
Individuals with clinically suspected cholera.
DATA EXTRACTION
Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the quality using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) criteria.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review of which 17 were used for meta-analysis. Crystal VC was the most frequently used RDT (13 studies), followed by Cholkit and Institut Pasteur cholera dipstick (three studies each), SD Bioline (two studies), Artron (one study) and Smart (one study). Using direct testing (n = 12 627 specimens), the bivariate random-effects model yielded a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 91% (95% CI 87%-94%) and 80% (95% CI 74%-84%), respectively. However, through alkaline peptone water (APW) enrichment (n = 3403 specimens), the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 89% (95% CI 79%-95%) and 98% (95% CI 95%-99%), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Cholera RDTs, especially when enriched with APW, have moderate sensitivity and specificity. Although less useful for clinical management, the current generation of RDTs have clear utility for surveillance efforts if used in a principled manner. Enrichment of stool specimens in APW before using cholera RDTs reduces the possibility of obtaining false-positive results, despite the few cholera cases that go undetected. It is noteworthy that APW-enriched cholera RDTs are not necessarily rapid tests, and are not listed in the Global Task Force on Cholera Control/WHO target product profile.
Topics: Cholera; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; Sensitivity and Specificity; Vibrio cholerae O1
PubMed: 34506946
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.027 -
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection... Aug 2021There has been an increasing resistance rate to tetracyclines, the first line treatment for cholera disease caused by V. cholera strains, worldwide. The aim of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There has been an increasing resistance rate to tetracyclines, the first line treatment for cholera disease caused by V. cholera strains, worldwide. The aim of the present study was to determine the global status of resistance to this class of antibiotic among V. cholera isolates.
METHODS
For the study, electronic databases were searched using the appropriate keywords including: 'Vibrio', 'cholera', 'Vibrio cholerae', 'V. cholerae', 'resistance', 'antibiotic resistance', 'antibiotic susceptibility', 'antimicrobial resistance', 'antimicrobial susceptibility', 'tetracycline', and 'doxycycline'. Finally, after some exclusion, 52 studies from different countries were selected and included in the study and meta-analysis was performed on the collected data.
RESULTS
The average resistance rate for serogroup O1 to tetracycline and doxycycline was 50% and 28%, respectively (95% CI). A high level of heterogeneity (I > 50%, p-value < 0.05) was observed in the studies representing resistance to tetracycline and doxycycline in O1 and non-O1, non-O139 serogroups. The Begg's tests did not indicate the publication bias (p-value > 0.05). However, the Egger's tests showed some evidence of publication bias in the studies conducted on serogroup O1.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of the present study show that the overall resistance to tetracyclines is relatively high and prevalent among V. cholerae isolates, throughout the world. This highlights the necessity of performing standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing prior to treatment choice along with monitoring and management of antibiotic resistance patterns of V. cholerae strains in order to reduce the emergence and propagation of antibiotic resistant strains as well as the failure of treatment.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Doxycycline; Serotyping; Tetracycline Resistance; Vibrio cholerae
PubMed: 34362438
DOI: 10.1186/s13756-021-00985-w -
The Science of the Total Environment Nov 2020Non-cholera Vibrio bacteria are a major cause of foodborne illness in the United States. Raw oysters are commonly implicated in gastroenteritis caused by pathogenic...
BACKGROUND
Non-cholera Vibrio bacteria are a major cause of foodborne illness in the United States. Raw oysters are commonly implicated in gastroenteritis caused by pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. In response to outbreaks in 1997-1998, the US Food and Drug Administration developed a nation-wide quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) of V. parahaemolyticus in raw oysters in 2005. The QMRA identified information gaps that new research may address. Incidence of sporadic V. parahaemolyticus illness has recently increased and, as oyster consumption increases and sea temperatures rise, V. parahaemolyticus outbreaks may become more frequent, posing health concerns. Updated and region-specific QMRAs will improve the accuracy and precision of risk of infection estimates.
OBJECTIVES
We identify research to support an updated QMRA of V. parahaemolyticus from oysters harvested in Chesapeake Bay and Puget Sound, focusing on observational and experimental research on post-harvest practices (PHPs) published from 2004 to 2019.
METHODS
A predefined search strategy was applied to PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Science.gov, NAL Agricola, and Google Scholar. Study eligibility criteria were defined using a population, intervention, comparator, and outcome statement. Reviewers independently coded abstracts for inclusion/exclusion using predefined criteria. Data were extracted and study quality and relevance evaluated based on published guidance for food safety risk assessments. Findings were synthesized using a weight of evidence approach.
RESULTS
Of 12,174 articles retrieved, 93 were included for full-text review. Twenty-seven studies were found to be high quality and high relevance, including studies on cold storage, high hydrostatic pressure, depuration, and disinfectant, and other PHPs. High hydrostatic pressure consistently emerged as the most effective PHP in reducing abundance of V. parahaemolyticus.
DISCUSSION
Limitations of the knowledge base and review approach involve the type and quantity of data reported. Future research should focus on PHPs for which few or no high quality and high relevance studies exist, such as irradiation and relaying.
Topics: Animals; Colony Count, Microbial; Food Contamination; Food Safety; Foodborne Diseases; Ostreidae; Seafood; Vibrio parahaemolyticus
PubMed: 32731065
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140795 -
PloS One 2019Vibrio vulnificus necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (VNSSTIs) are associated with a high mortality rate that varies remarkably with host susceptibility.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vibrio vulnificus necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections (VNSSTIs) are associated with a high mortality rate that varies remarkably with host susceptibility. Hepatic disease (HD) is considered the key risk factor for high VNSSTIs incidence and mortality; however, there is limited evidence in the literature to support this observation.
METHODOLOGY
We examined all reported cases of VNSSTIs and associated mortality rates between 1966 and mid-2018. The PubMed, Medline and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for observational studies on patients with VNSSTIs. Twelve studies with 1157 total patients with VNSSTIs were included in the analysis. From the pooled dataset, nearly half (46.8%) of the patients with VNSSTIs had HD. The mortality rate in HD patients with VNSSTIs was 53.9% (n = 292/542), which was considerably higher than the mortality rate of 16.1% (n = 99/615) in non-HD patients. Patients with HD contracted VNSSTIs were found to be two or more times (RR = 2.61, 95% CI = 2.14-3.19) as likely to die compared with those without HD. Besides, liver cirrhosis (LC), the end-stage HD, was confirmed to be a significant risk factor, with risk ratios of 1.84 (95% CI 1.21-2.79) and 2.00 (95% CI 1.41-2.85) when compared to non-LC and non-HD, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
HD with or without LC can be associated with infections and complications from V. vulnificus. Clinicians should aggressively approach care and management of acutely and/or critically ill patients with VNSSTIs.
Topics: Humans; Incidence; Liver Diseases; Mortality; Odds Ratio; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Soft Tissue Infections; Vibrio Infections; Vibrio vulnificus
PubMed: 31652263
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223513 -
Annali Di Igiene : Medicina Preventiva... 2019Cholera, an acute diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae), is an endemic disease and a major public health problem in Iran. Antibiotic therapy can... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Cholera, an acute diarrheal disease caused by Vibrio cholerae (V. cholerae), is an endemic disease and a major public health problem in Iran. Antibiotic therapy can decrease duration of the disease, transmission of infection and contamination of the environment. Considering different pattern of V. cholerae antibiotic resistance around the world, the aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence of antibiotic resistance of V. cholerae in Iran.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed using related keywords in the electronic national and international databases including SID, Irandoc, Iran Medex and Magiran as well as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and ISI web of knowledge. Up to July 31, 2018, 27 eligible papers were included in our meta-analysis based on the defined inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
V. cholerae O1 was the most prevalent strain isolated in Iran and exhibited a high resistance rate against numerous antibiotics including chloramphenicol (33.6%), oxytetracycline (40.2%), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (86%), tetracycline (34.5%), furazolidone (69.8%), streptomycin (93.8%), polymyxin (80.7%), ampicillin (32.1%), nalidixic acid (88.9%), kanamycin (29%) and amoxicillin (30.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
According to the meta-analysis results, antibiotic therapy with ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, gentamicin, azithromycin, cefixime and cefepime could be effective for the treatment of severe cases of cholera in Iran.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cholera; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Iran; Vibrio cholerae; Vibrio cholerae O1
PubMed: 31069372
DOI: 10.7416/ai.2019.229 -
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases Feb 2019Oral vaccines underperform in low-income and middle-income countries compared with in high-income countries. Whether interventions can improve oral vaccine performance... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Oral vaccines underperform in low-income and middle-income countries compared with in high-income countries. Whether interventions can improve oral vaccine performance is uncertain.
METHODS
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions designed to increase oral vaccine efficacy or immunogenicity. We searched Ovid-MEDLINE and Embase for trials published until Oct 23, 2017. Inclusion criteria for meta-analysis were two or more studies per intervention category and available seroconversion data. We did random-effects meta-analyses to produce summary relative risk (RR) estimates. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017060608).
FINDINGS
Of 2843 studies identified, 87 were eligible for qualitative synthesis and 66 for meta-analysis. 22 different interventions were assessed for oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), oral rotavirus vaccine (RVV), oral cholera vaccine (OCV), and oral typhoid vaccines. There was generally high heterogeneity. Seroconversion to RVV was significantly increased by delaying the first RVV dose by 4 weeks (RR 1·37, 95% CI 1·16-1·62) and OPV seroconversion was increased with monovalent or bivalent OPV compared with trivalent OPV (RR 1·51, 95% CI 1·20-1·91). There was some evidence that separating RVV and OPV increased RVV seroconversion (RR 1·21, 95% CI 1·00-1·47) and that higher vaccine inoculum improved OCV seroconversion (RR 1·12, 95% CI 1·00-1·26). There was no evidence of effect for anthelmintics, antibiotics, probiotics, zinc, vitamin A, withholding breastfeeding, extra doses, or vaccine buffering.
INTERPRETATION
Most strategies did not improve oral vaccine performance. Delaying RVV and reducing OPV valence should be considered within immunisation programmes to reduce global enteric disease. New strategies to address the gap in oral vaccine efficacy are urgently required.
FUNDING
Wellcome Trust, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, UK Medical Research Council, and WHO Polio Research Committee.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Cholera; Cholera Vaccines; Female; Humans; Immunogenicity, Vaccine; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Male; Poliomyelitis; Poliovirus; Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral; Rotavirus; Rotavirus Infections; Rotavirus Vaccines; Salmonella typhi; Seroconversion; Treatment Outcome; Typhoid Fever; Typhoid-Paratyphoid Vaccines; Vaccination; Vibrio cholerae; Young Adult
PubMed: 30712836
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30602-9