-
JAMA Cardiology Apr 2024Implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in real-world practice remains suboptimal. It is unclear which interventions are most effective at addressing...
IMPORTANCE
Implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in real-world practice remains suboptimal. It is unclear which interventions are most effective at addressing current barriers to GDMT in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review to identify which types of system-level initiatives are most effective at improving GDMT use among patients with HFrEF.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases were queried from January 2010 to November 2023 for randomized clinical trials that implemented a quality improvement intervention with GDMT use as a primary or secondary outcome. References from related review articles were also included for screening. Quality of studies and bias assessment were graded based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.
FINDINGS
Twenty-eight randomized clinical trials were included with an aggregate sample size of 19 840 patients. Studies were broadly categorized as interdisciplinary interventions (n = 15), clinician education (n = 5), electronic health record initiatives (n = 6), or patient education (n = 2). Overall, interdisciplinary titration clinics were associated with significant increases in the proportion of patients on target doses of GDMT with a 10% to 60% and 2% to 53% greater proportion of patients on target doses of β-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, respectively, in intervention groups compared with usual care. Other interventions, such as audits, clinician and patient education, or electronic health record alerts, were also associated with some improvements in GDMT utilization, though these findings were inconsistent across studies.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This review summarizes interventions aimed at optimization of GDMT in clinical practice. Initiatives that used interdisciplinary teams, largely comprised of nurses and pharmacists, most consistently led to improvements in GDMT. Additional large, randomized studies are necessary to better understand other types of interventions, as well as their long-term efficacy and sustainability.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Quality Improvement
PubMed: 38381449
DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.5627 -
International Journal of Cardiology.... Apr 2024Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) based T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) are powerful tools for identifying myocardial fibrosis. This systematic...
BACKGROUND
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) based T1 mapping and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) are powerful tools for identifying myocardial fibrosis. This systematic review and -analysis aims to characterize the utility of native T1 mapping and ECV in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and to clarify the prognostic significance of elevated values.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted for studies reporting on use of CMR-based native T1 mapping and ECV measurement in NICM patients and their association with major adverse cardiac events (MACE), ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), and left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR). Databases searched included: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search was not restricted to time or publication status.
RESULTS
Native T1 and ECV were significantly higher in NICM patients compared to controls (MD 78.80, 95 % CI 50.00, 107.59; p < 0.01; MD 5.86, 95 % CI 4.55, 7.16; p < 0.01). NICM patients who experienced MACE had higher native T1 and ECV (MD 52.87, 95 % CI 26.59, 79.15; p < 0.01; MD 6.03, 95 % CI 3.79, 8.26; p < 0.01). There was a non-statistically significant trend toward higher native T1 time in NICM patients who experienced VAs. NICM patients who were poor treatment responders had higher baseline native T1 and ECV (MD 40.58, 95 % CI 12.90, 68.25; p < 0.01; MD 3.29, 95 % CI 2.25, 4.33; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
CMR-based native T1 and ECV quantification may be useful tools for risk stratification of patients with NICM. They may provide additional diagnostic utility in combination with LGE, which poorly characterizes fibrosis in patients with diffuse myocardial involvement.
PubMed: 38371310
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101339 -
Heart, Lung & Circulation Mar 2024Chronic kidney disease (CKD) coexists in up to 50% of heart failure (HF) patients, affecting both those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with preserved... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) coexists in up to 50% of heart failure (HF) patients, affecting both those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Although the efficacy of several guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) has been well established, the treatment recommendations are similar for those patients with HF with and without CKD. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of GDMT in patients with HF with versus those without CKD.
METHOD
This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials that compared the efficacy of GDMT (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor [ACE-I], beta blocker, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor) in patients with HF with and without CKD. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death and HF hospitalisation. Risk ratios (RR) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 19 trials (15 trials in HFrEF and four trials in HFpEF) enrolling 63,677 (38% had CKD) participants were included. Among HFrEF patients, GDMT reduced the primary endpoint in those with CKD (RR 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.82) and without CKD (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84). Among HFpEF patients, the pooled summary RR for GDMT reducing the primary endpoint was 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.91) among those with CKD and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77-0.99) among those without CKD. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of GDMT in head-to-head comparisons between those with and without CKD in HFrEF (ratio of RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.88-1.06) and HFpEF (ratio of RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11).
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with HF, GDMT had a consistent effect in reducing adverse cardiovascular events in those with and without CKD. Future studies should investigate the best strategy to ensure patients with HF with CKD receive and tolerate GDMT when indicated.
Topics: Humans; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume
PubMed: 38365495
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.12.013 -
Journal of Cardiovascular... Apr 2024Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently co-exist. Contemporary classification of HF categorizes it into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently co-exist. Contemporary classification of HF categorizes it into HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Aggregate data comparing the risk profile of AF between these three HF categories are lacking.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at determining any significant differences in AF-associated all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, cardiovascular mortality (CV), and stroke between HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases until February 28, 2023. Data were combined using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 22 studies comprising 248 323 patients were retained: HFrEF 123 331 (49.7%), HFmrEF 40 995 (16.5%), and HFpEF 83 997 (33.8%). Pooled baseline AF prevalence was 36% total population, 30% HFrEF, 36% HFmrEF, and 42% HFpEF. AF was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in the total population with pooled hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.21), HFmrEF (HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.05-1.50) and HFpEF (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.09-1.24), but not HFrEF (HR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.93-1.14). AF was associated with a higher risk of HF hospitalizations in the total population (HR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.14-1.46), HFmrEF (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.20-2.24), and HFpEF (HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.17-1.83), but not HFrEF (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.87-1.18). AF was only associated with CV in the HFpEF subcategory but was associated with stroke in all three HF subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS
AF appears to be associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization in HFmrEF and HFpEF. With these findings, the paucity of data and treatment guidelines on AF in the HFmrEF subgroup becomes even more significant and warrant further investigations.
Topics: Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Heart Failure; Prognosis; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Stroke
PubMed: 38348517
DOI: 10.1111/jce.16209 -
Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Feb 2024Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) plays a key role in the initial work-up of myocarditis where the identification of pathologic structural and functional changes may... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) plays a key role in the initial work-up of myocarditis where the identification of pathologic structural and functional changes may assist in its diagnosis and management. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the evidence for the utility of echocardiographic parameters of cardiac structure and function in the diagnosis of myocarditis in adult populations.
METHODS
A systematic literature search of medical databases was performed using PRISMA principles to identify all relevant studies assessing TTE parameters in adult patients with myocarditis (1995-2020; English only; PROSPERO registration CRD42021243598). Data for a range of structural and functional TTE parameters were individually extracted and those with low heterogeneity were then meta-analyzed using a random-effects model for effect size, and assessed through standardized mean difference (SMD).
RESULTS
Available data from six studies (with a pooled total of 269 myocarditis patients and 240 controls) revealed that myocarditis can be reliably differentiated from healthy controls using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) size and systolic function, in particular LV end-diastolic diameter, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) (p ≤ .01 for all). LV-GLS demonstrated the highest overall effect size, followed by LVEF and LVEDD (SMD: |0.46-1.98|). Two studies also demonstrated that impairment in LV-GLS was associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in this population, irrespective of LVEF.
CONCLUSIONS
LV-GLS demonstrated the greatest overall effect size and therefore ability to differentiate myocarditis populations from healthy controls. GLS was also shown to be a predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, in this population.
HIGHTLIGHTS
What is already known on this subject? Myocarditis is a disease process that is often a diagnosis of exclusion, as it frequently mimics other acute cardiac pathologies. Transthoracic echocardiography is traditionally the initial imaging modality used for noninvasive structural assessment in populations with myocarditis. What might this study add? This study demonstrates that left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain, LV ejection fraction and LV end-diastolic diameter can differentiate between myocarditis patients and healthy controls. LV-GLS demonstrated the greatest overall effect size when comparing these two populations, in comparison to the other measures. How might this impact on clinical practice? This study demonstrates that assessment of myocardial deformation indices allows for sensitive discrimination between myocarditis patients from healthy controls. Routine assessment of LV-GLS may serve as an important diagnostic tool in the acute care setting.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Myocarditis; Echocardiography; Ventricular Function, Left; Stroke Volume; Heart Ventricles; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left
PubMed: 38345413
DOI: 10.1111/echo.15760 -
Diabetologia Apr 2024Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) without symptoms, and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent the most common phenotypes of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) without symptoms, and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent the most common phenotypes of HF in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and are more common than HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) in these individuals. However, diagnostic criteria for HF have changed over the years, resulting in heterogeneity in the prevalence/incidence rates reported in different studies. We aimed to give an overview of the diagnosis and epidemiology of HF in type 2 diabetes, using both a narrative and systematic review approach; we focus narratively on diagnosing (using the 2021 European Society of Cardiology [ESC] guidelines) and screening for HF in type 2 diabetes. We performed an updated (2016-October 2022) systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the prevalence and incidence of HF subtypes in adults ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes, using echocardiographic data. Embase and MEDLINE databases were searched and data were assessed using random-effects meta-analyses, with findings presented as forest plots. From the 5015 studies found, 209 were screened using the full-text article. In total, 57 studies were included, together with 29 studies that were identified in a prior meta-analysis; these studies reported on the prevalence of LVSD (n=25 studies, 24,460 individuals), LVDD (n=65 studies, 25,729 individuals), HFrEF (n=4 studies, 4090 individuals), HFmrEF (n=2 studies, 2442 individuals) and/or HFpEF (n=8 studies, 5292 individuals), and on HF incidence (n=7 studies, 17,935 individuals). Using Hoy et al's risk-of-bias tool, we found that the studies included generally had a high risk of bias. They showed a prevalence of 43% (95% CI 37%, 50%) for LVDD, 17% (95% CI 7%, 35%) for HFpEF, 6% (95% CI 3%, 10%) for LVSD, 7% (95% CI 3%, 15%) for HFrEF, and 12% (95% CI 7%, 22%) for HFmrEF. For LVDD, grade I was found to be most prevalent. Additionally, we reported a higher incidence rate of HFpEF (7% [95% CI 4%, 11%]) than HFrEF 4% [95% CI 3%, 7%]). The evidence is limited by the heterogeneity of the diagnostic criteria over the years. The systematic section of this review provides new insights on the prevalence/incidence of HF in type 2 diabetes, unveiling a large pre-clinical target group with LVDD/HFpEF in which disease progression could be halted by early recognition and treatment.Registration PROSPERO ID CRD42022368035.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Heart Failure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Stroke Volume; Prognosis; Disease Progression
PubMed: 38334818
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-023-06068-2 -
Maturitas May 2024Currently, one of the main causes of death in women with breast cancer is cardiovascular disease caused by the oncologic therapies. Exercise has demonstrated positive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Currently, one of the main causes of death in women with breast cancer is cardiovascular disease caused by the oncologic therapies. Exercise has demonstrated positive effects on cardiovascular fitness in individuals without cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cardioprotective effects of exercise in women with breast cancer, during and after the application of their treatments.
METHODS
Systematic search was done in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro. The articles must have been published in the last ten years; the intervention to be evaluated was to consist of an exercise program; the sample had to comprise women who were undergoing breast cancer treatment or who had completed it at the time of the intervention; and the outcome variables had to include at least one parameter for the assessment of cardiac function and/or structure.
RESULTS
Of the 28 articles identified, nine reported non-randomized controlled studies, 16 randomized clinical trials and three quasi-experimental studies. The effects of exercise on left ventricular ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain and the E/A waveforms ratio were not significant. However, its effect on VOmax was significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Exercise does not seem to be effective in avoiding the cardiotoxic effects of oncological treatment for breast cancer. Although exercise seems to mitigate the symptomatology, reflected in improved functional capacity, more long-term studies are needed.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION CODE
CRD42023391441.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Cardiotoxicity; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Exercise; Exercise Therapy
PubMed: 38325133
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107932 -
Cardiology in Review Feb 2024Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent and challenging condition with limited therapeutic options. This meta-analysis aims to assess the...
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent and challenging condition with limited therapeutic options. This meta-analysis aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of interatrial shunt devices (IASD) in the treatment of HFpEF, focusing on key hemodynamic parameters and clinical outcomes. Six clinical trials, encompassing 324 patients, were included in this analysis. The results showed a significant reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) at rest after IASD implantation, with a mean difference of 1.55 mm Hg. PCWP during exercise also exhibited a decrease, indicating improved exercise tolerance. However, there was an increase in mean right atrial pressure following IASD implantation. These findings suggest that IASD implementation can effectively lower left atrial pressure, a critical target in HFpEF management. This results in substantial clinical improvements, including enhanced New York Heart Association class, quality of life, and 6-minute walk distance. Echocardiographic assessments revealed a reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index and stable right ventricular changes. The meta-analysis underscores the potential benefits of IASD in ameliorating the symptoms and clinical outcomes of HFpEF patients. The increase in mean right atrial pressure warrants further investigation into its effects on right heart function. Additionally, this analysis emphasizes the need for larger, randomized clinical trials to validate these findings and determine optimal patient selection criteria. IASD implantation holds promise as a therapeutic option for HFpEF, offering the potential to improve the quality of life and functional status of affected patients. However, further research is imperative to confirm its efficacy relative to existing treatments and to address concerns regarding its impact on right heart function. This meta-analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of IASD's role in HFpEF management.
PubMed: 38323875
DOI: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000641 -
Heart, Lung & Circulation Feb 2024Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for >50% of heart failure cases and is associated with significant morbidity and health system burden. To... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The Effect of Weight Loss Through Lifestyle Interventions in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
BACKGROUND
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for >50% of heart failure cases and is associated with significant morbidity and health system burden. To date, there have been limited treatment options proven to improve outcomes in these patients, with sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors the first class of drug to demonstrate significant clinical benefits, including reductions in heart failure hospitalisation. Obesity is associated with all forms of heart failure and has been linked with worse clinical outcomes. Numerous reviews support the benefits of weight loss in heart failure, more specifically in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, the evidence in HFpEF patients is less clear. With limited pharmacotherapy options and growing support for weight loss in patients with HFpEF, this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to examine the effects of lifestyle interventions on weight loss and other health outcomes in patients with HFpEF.
METHODS
Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases were searched to identify relevant studies up to February 2023. Included studies were randomised controlled trials (with a duration of four weeks or more) of lifestyle interventions conducted in adults with HFpEF that reported weight loss. Outcomes of interest were body weight, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), aerobic capacity (6-minute walk distance), New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification, self-reported health quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire; MLHFQ), and N-terminal pro B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) levels. Review Manager software was used to conduct random effect meta-analyses, forest plots were generated for each outcome, and between-study heterogeneity was estimated using the I test statistic. Risk-of-bias assessment used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.
RESULTS
From 2,282 records identified, six studies with a total of 375 participants, between three to six months in duration, were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Lifestyle interventions consisted of diet only, exercise only, combination of diet and exercise, and education and exercise. Over a mean follow-up of 4.5 months, pooled effects of the interventions were associated with a reduction in body weight of >5kg (weight mean difference (WMD): -5.30 kg; 95% CI: -8.72 to -1.87; p=0.002), and a reduction in resting systolic (WMD: -2.98 mmHg; 95% CI: -4.20 to -1.76; p<0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD: -4.51 mmHg; 95% CI: -8.39 to -0.64; p=0.02) compared with those who received usual care. Interventions also improved 6-minute walk distance (WMD: 43.63 m; 95% CI: 22.28 to 64.97; p<0.001), NYHA class (WMD: -0.54; 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.33; p<0.001), and MLHFQ score (WMD: -17.77; 95% CL: -19.00 to -16.53; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION
In patients with HFpEF, lifestyle intervention was associated with a significant reduction in body weight and had favourable effects on blood pressure, aerobic capacity, NYHA class, and health-related quality of life. Further research is needed in this population to examine the feasibility and durability of weight loss interventions and to examine the potential impact on hard clinical endpoints.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Heart Failure; Quality of Life; Stroke Volume; Life Style; Body Weight; Weight Loss; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38320881
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.11.022 -
ESC Heart Failure Jun 2024The purpose of this study was to systematically review the development, performance, and applicability of prognostic models developed for predicting poor events in... (Review)
Review
The purpose of this study was to systematically review the development, performance, and applicability of prognostic models developed for predicting poor events in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Databases including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, Wei Pu, and China Biological Medicine were queried from their respective dates of inception to 1 June 2023, to examine multivariate models for prognostic prediction in HFpEF. Both forward and backward citations of all studies were included in our analysis. Two researchers individually used the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist to extract data and assess the quality of the models using the Predictive Mode Bias Risk Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Among the 6897 studies screened, 16 studies derived and/or validated a total of 39 prognostic models. The sample size ranges for model development, internal validation, and external validation are 119 to 5988, 152 to 1000, and 30 to 5957, respectively. The most frequently employed modelling technique was Cox proportional hazards regression. Six studies (37.50%) conducted internal validation of models; bootstrap and k-fold cross-validation were the commonly used methods for internal validation of models. Ten of these models (25.64%) were validated externally, with reported the c-statistic in the external validation set ranging from 0.70 to 0.96, while the remaining models await external validation. The MEDIA echo score and I-PRESERVE-sudden cardiac death prediction mode have been externally validated using multiple cohorts, and the results consistently show good predictive performance. The most frequently used predictors identified among the models were age, n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, ejection fraction, albumin, and hospital stay in the last 5 months owing to heart failure. All study predictor domains and outcome domains were at low risk of bias, high or unclear risk of bias of all prognostic models due to underreporting in the area of analysis. All studies did not evaluate the clinical utility of the prognostic models. Predictive models for predicting prognostic outcomes in patients with HFpEF showed good discriminatory ability but their utility and generalization remain uncertain due to the risk of bias, differences in predictors between models, and the lack of clinical application studies. Future studies should improve the methodological quality of model development and conduct external validation of models.
Topics: Humans; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume; Prognosis; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 38318693
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14696