-
Clinical Transplantation Mar 2024Belatacept (BTC), a fusion protein, selectively inhibits T-cell co-stimulation by binding to the CD80 and CD86 receptors on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and has been...
BACKGROUND
Belatacept (BTC), a fusion protein, selectively inhibits T-cell co-stimulation by binding to the CD80 and CD86 receptors on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and has been used as immunosuppression in adult renal transplant recipients. However, data regarding its use in heart transplant (HT) recipients are limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to delineate BTC's application in HT, focusing on efficacy, safety, and associated complications at a high-volume HT center.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients who underwent HT between January 2017 and December 2021 and subsequently received BTC as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. Twenty-one HT recipients were identified. Baseline characteristics, history of rejection, and indication for BTC use were collected. Outcomes included renal function, graft function, allograft rejection and mortality. Follow-up data were collected through December 2023.
RESULTS
Among 776 patients monitored from January 2017 to December 2021 21 (2.7%) received BTC treatment. Average age at transplantation was 53 years (± 12 years), and 38% were women. BTC administration began, on average, 689 [483, 1830] days post-HT. The primary indications for BTC were elevated pre-formed donor-specific antibodies in highly sensitized patients (66.6%) and renal sparing (23.8%), in conjunction with reduced calcineurin inhibitor dosage. Only one (4.8%) patient encountered rejection within a year of starting BTC. Graft function by echocardiography remained stable at 6 and 12 months posttreatment. An improvement was observed in serum creatinine levels (76.2% of patients), decreasing from a median of 1.58 to 1.45 (IQR [1.0-2.1] to [1.1-1.9]) over 12 months (p = .054). eGFR improved at 3 and 6 months compared with 3 months pre- BTC levels; however, this was not statistically significant (p = .24). Treatment discontinuation occurred in seven patients (33.3%) of whom four (19%) were switched back to full dose CNI. Infections occurred in 11 patients (52.4%), leading to BTC discontinuation in 4 patients (19%).
CONCLUSION
In this cohort, BTC therapy was used as alternative immunosuppression for management of highly sensitized patients or for renal sparing. BTC therapy when combined with CNI dose reduction resulted in stabilization in renal function as measured through renal surrogate markers, which did not, however, reach statistical significance. Patients on BTC maintained a low rejection rate and preserved graft function. Infections were common during BTC therapy and were associated with medication pause/discontinuation in 19% of patients. Further randomized studies are needed to assess the efficacy and safety of BTC in HT recipients.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Abatacept; Retrospective Studies; Kidney Transplantation; Immunosuppressive Agents; Calcineurin Inhibitors; T-Lymphocytes; Heart Transplantation; Graft Rejection; Transplant Recipients; Graft Survival
PubMed: 38504576
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15251 -
Clinical Rheumatology May 2024Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoporosis are two chronic disorders that are often seen together. RA is an autoimmune disorder that causes pain and inflammation in the... (Review)
Review
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoporosis are two chronic disorders that are often seen together. RA is an autoimmune disorder that causes pain and inflammation in the joints, while osteoporosis is a disorder in which the bones become weak and fragile. Risk factors for bone loss in RA include disease activity, longer disease duration, erosive disease, autoantibody positivity, and joint damage leading to impaired physical activity. Recent research has shown that there is a complex interplay between immune cells, cytokines, and bone remodeling processes in both RA and osteoporosis. The bone remodeling process is regulated by cytokines and immune system signaling pathways, with osteoclasts activated through the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway and the Wnt/DKK1/sclerostin pathway. Understanding these mechanisms can aid in developing targeted therapies for treatment of osteoporosis in RA patients. Current pharmacological approaches include anti-osteoporotic drugs such as bisphosphonates, denosumab, teriparatide, abaloparatide, raloxifene, and romosozumab. Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs such as methotrexate and biologicals including TNF inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, rituximab, and abatacept lower disease activity in RA and can improve bone metabolism by reducing inflammation but have limited impact on bone mineral density. This review will shed light on the relationship between osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis as well as the various factors that influence the onset of osteoporosis in RA patients. We also explore several treatment approaches to effectively managing osteoporosis in RA patients.
Topics: Humans; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Osteoporosis; Antirheumatic Agents; Bone Density; Inflammation
PubMed: 38499817
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-024-06932-5 -
Journal of the American Academy of... Mar 2024
Executive Summary: From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Perioperative management of immunomodulatory agents in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
PubMed: 38499181
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.03.008 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Jun 2024Haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for nonmalignant disease (NMD) carries inherent challenges of both alloreactivity and graft failure....
Long-Term Follow-Up of Abatacept, Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide, and Sirolimus-Based Haploidentical Transplantation in Younger Patients with Nonmalignant Diseases.
Haploidentical (haplo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for nonmalignant disease (NMD) carries inherent challenges of both alloreactivity and graft failure. Building on promising results from pilot studies in which abatacept was combined with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and sirolimus (AbaCyS) in younger NMD patients undergoing haplo-HCT, we present the long-term outcomes of this protocol. On the back of uniform disease-specific conditioning regimens containing antithymocyte globulin 4.5 mg/kg from day -9 to day -7, GVHD prophylaxis with AbaCyS consisted of abatacept administered on days 0, +5, +20, +35, and monthly until 180 days with PTCy and sirolimus. The patients were followed up with longitudinal assessment of immune reconstitution, growth, and reproductive development and quality of life (QoL) analyses. Among 40 patients (aplastic anemia, n = 24; hemoglobinopathies, n = 14; and primary immunodeficiencies, n = 2) with a median age of 10 years (range, 2 to 25 years), 95% achieved sustained engraftment. Post-transplantation hemophagocytic syndrome was detected in 3 patients, leading to graft failure in 2 cases. The incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 2.6%, and that of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 14.3%. Cytomegalovirus, adenovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus infections were observed in 45%, 5%, and 0% respectively. Rates of nonrelapse mortality, overall survival, event-free survival, and GVHD-free, event-free survival were 5%, 95%, 90%, and 82%, respectively, at a median follow-up of 4.6 years. Absence of cGVHD correlated with younger patient age and early sustained recovery of regulatory T cells and mature natural killer cells, which in turn was associated with improved QoL and lack of late infections. The AbaCyS protocol was associated with excellent long-term survival, with attenuation of both early and late alloreactivity in >80% of younger patients undergoing haplo-HCT for NMD. This study sheds light on predispositions to cGVHD and its impact on QoL, warranting further optimization of this approach.
Topics: Humans; Cyclophosphamide; Adult; Female; Male; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Adolescent; Sirolimus; Child; Child, Preschool; Abatacept; Young Adult; Follow-Up Studies; Graft vs Host Disease; Transplantation, Haploidentical; Immunosuppressive Agents; Quality of Life; Transplantation Conditioning
PubMed: 38490295
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.03.010 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology Mar 2024To analyse in routine practice the efficacy of targeted therapies on joint involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis/systemic sclerosis (RA/SSc) overlap syndrome.
Potential efficacy of T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies on articular involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis overlap syndrome. Results from a 2-centre series of 22 cases.
OBJECTIVES
To analyse in routine practice the efficacy of targeted therapies on joint involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis/systemic sclerosis (RA/SSc) overlap syndrome.
METHODS
This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of two academic centres over a 10-year period. Joint response to targeted therapies was measured according to EULAR criteria based on Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28. In addition, changes in CRP level and glucocorticoid consumption were recorded.
RESULTS
Nineteen patients were included. Methotrexate (n=11) and hydroxychloroquine (n=4) were the most used first-line treatments. Targeted therapies were frequently used (n=14). Tocilizumab was the most selected therapy (n=8), then rituximab (n=5), abatacept and anti-tumour necrosis factor (n=4). Twenty-one treatment sequences were assessed, including 18 with EULAR response criteria. Responses were "good" or "moderate" in 100% (4/4) of patients treated with abatacept, 80% (4/5) with rituximab, 40% (2/5) with tocilizumab, and 25% (1/4) with anti-TNF. T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies (abatacept, rituximab) resulted more frequently in a "good" or "moderate" response compared to cytokine inhibitors (tocilizumab, etanercept, infliximab) with a significant decrease in DAS-28 at 6 months (-1.75; p=0.016) and a trend to a lower consumption of glucocorticoids.
CCONCLUSIONS
In patients with RA/SSc overlap syndrome refractory to conventional synthetic-DMARDs, T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies seem to be a promising therapeutic option to control joint activity.
PubMed: 38489323
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/0znf7e -
Seminars in Respiratory and Critical... Jun 2024Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal treatment for... (Review)
Review
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common pulmonary complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Optimal treatment for RA-ILD is not yet well defined. Reliable prognostic indicators are largely byproducts of prior ILD progression, including low or decreasing forced vital capacity and extensive or worsening fibrosis on imaging. In the absence of validated tools to predict treatment response, decisions about whether to initiate or augment treatment are instead based on clinical judgment. In general, treatment should be initiated in patients who are symptomatic, progressing, or at high risk of poor outcomes. Retrospective data suggest that mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab are likely effective therapies for RA-ILD. Abatacept is also emerging as a potential first-line treatment option for patients with RA-ILD. Further, recent data demonstrate that immunosuppression may be beneficial even in patients with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on imaging, suggesting that immunosuppression should be considered irrespective of imaging pattern. Recent randomized controlled trials have shown that antifibrotic medications, such as nintedanib and likely pirfenidone, slow forced vital capacity decline in RA-ILD. Consideration can be given to antifibrotic initiation in patients progressing despite immunosuppression, particularly in patients with a UIP pattern. Future research directions include developing tools to predict which patients will remain stable from patients who will progress, discriminating patients who will respond to treatment from nonresponders, and developing algorithms for starting immunosuppression, antifibrotics, or both as first-line therapies.
Topics: Humans; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Immunosuppressive Agents; Disease Progression; Antirheumatic Agents; Abatacept; Prognosis; Mycophenolic Acid; Rituximab; Vital Capacity; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Azathioprine; Indoles
PubMed: 38484788
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782218 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2024This study aims to describe clinical features, therapeutic outcomes, and safety profiles in patients affected by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and inborn errors of...
OBJECTIVES
This study aims to describe clinical features, therapeutic outcomes, and safety profiles in patients affected by juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and inborn errors of immunity (IEI) treated with biological Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).
METHODS
We enrolled three patients who were followed in the Pediatric Rheumatology Unit at Meyer Children's Hospital in Florence; these patients were affected by JIA, according to ILAR criteria, and IEI, according to the IUIS Phenotypical Classification for Human Inborn Errors of Immunity. Among them, two patients had 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) and one patient had X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA).
RESULTS
Case 1: A 6-year and 2-month-old boy was affected by 22q11.2DS, associated with oligoarticular JIA, at the age of 2 years. He was treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and methotrexate, along with oral glucocorticoids but with no benefits. Treatment with etanercept allowed him to achieve remission after 10 months. Case 2: A 6-year and 2-month-old girl was affected by 22q11.2DS, associated with oligoarticular JIA, at the age of 3 years and 11 months. She was treated with NSAIDs, joint injections, and methotrexate but without clinical response. Treatment with Adalimumab allowed her to achieve remission after 6 months. Case 3: A 12-year and 2-month-old boy was affected by XLA, associated with polyarticular JIA, at the age of 9 years and 11 months. He was treated with NSAIDs, methotrexate, joint injections, and oral glucocorticoids with no benefits. He failed to respond to anti-TNF-alpha, tocilizumab, and abatacept. Currently, he is undergoing therapy with sirolimus plus abatacept, which allowed him to achieve remission after 4 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that the use of immunosuppressive biological therapies can control disease activity in these patients. No adverse drug-related reactions were observed during the follow-up.
PubMed: 38468871
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1353825 -
The Australasian Journal of Dermatology May 2024
Topics: Humans; Abatacept; Mycosis Fungoides; Drug Eruptions; Female; Skin Neoplasms; Antirheumatic Agents; Middle Aged; Male; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Aged
PubMed: 38454790
DOI: 10.1111/ajd.14249 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) Mar 2024To investigate cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab compared with those who received tumour...
OBJECTIVES
To investigate cancer risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab compared with those who received tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and compared with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARD) naïve RA patients.
METHODS
Nationwide registry-based cohort study of RA patients initiating treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, rituximab, TNFi, and bDMARD-naive patients their second type of conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). Patients were identified in DANBIO and followed for cancer from 2006-2020. Patients could contribute multiple treatments, with person years (PYRS), deaths, and cancers allocated to each treatment group in a 'latest type of treatment' manner. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and weighted cause-specific Cox models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for cancer in each tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, and rituximab group compared with TNFI and bDMARD naïve groups, respectively.
RESULTS
In total, 21 982 treatment initiations, 96 475 PYRS, and 1423 cancers were identified. There were no statistically significant increased HRs for overall cancer in tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab treatment groups (HRs ranged from 0.7-1.1). More than five years of abatacept exposure showed a non-significantly increased HR compared with TNFi (HR 1.41, 95% confidence intervals CI 0.74-2.71). For hematological cancers, rituximab treatment showed non-significantly reduced HRs: vs TNFi (HR 0.09; 95%CI 0.00-2.06) and bDMARD-naïve (HR 0.13; 95%CI 0.00-1.89).
CONCLUSION
Treatment with tocilizumab/sarilumab, abatacept, or rituximab in RA patients was not associated with increased risks of cancer compared with TNFi-treated and with bDMARD-naïve RA patients in a real-world setting.
PubMed: 38452297
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae140 -
Modern Rheumatology Mar 2024We evaluated the medication selection and clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who started treatment with/without methotrexate (using biologic...
Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug selection in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biologics or JAK inhibitors without methotrexate: A retrospective hospital-based administrative claims database study.
OBJECTIVES
We evaluated the medication selection and clinical characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who started treatment with/without methotrexate (using biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or Janus kinase inhibitors [JAKi] instead) in Japan.
METHODS
Using a Japanese hospital-based administrative claims database, RA patients who received treatment (abatacept, interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor [IL-6Ri], tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, or JAKi) between 1/January/2015 and 31/December/2019 were enrolled.
RESULTS
In total 19,301 patients were included (10,530 receiving methotrexate; 8,771 not receiving methotrexate within 60 days of the first treatment). Mean ages at diagnosis were 60.7 and 65.9 years in the methotrexate and non-methotrexate groups (p <0.0001). The non-methotrexate group had higher proportions of patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1 (p <0.0001), and higher comorbidity rates. Abatacept was the most frequently used drug among patients with infectious/parasitic, circulatory, and respiratory diseases at baseline. IL-6Ri had the highest use rate among patients with neoplasms; blood, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary diseases; and abnormal clinical/laboratory findings. Abatacept had the highest persistence probability from 6 months onward.
CONCLUSIONS
Methotrexate is used less frequently among older Japanese RA patients or those with comorbidities. Abatacept is the most frequently used drug, followed by IL-6Ri, in patients not using methotrexate at the treatment start.
PubMed: 38450776
DOI: 10.1093/mr/roae021