-
PharmacoEconomics - Open Jun 2024Today, there are many treatment options available for the management of ulcerative colitis, creating challenges in selecting the most efficacious and cost-effective...
BACKGROUND
Today, there are many treatment options available for the management of ulcerative colitis, creating challenges in selecting the most efficacious and cost-effective treatment sequences. Treatments in the anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) therapeutic class, as well as vedolizumab, are widely used and endorsed as first-line options according to treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to compare treatment sequences involving vedolizumab and the anti-TNFα treatment adalimumab in terms of cost-effectiveness in the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in Italy.
METHODS
A cost-effectiveness model comparing treatment sequences within the Italian National Health Service in terms of costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) with a lifetime horizon was developed. The analysis focused on the relative positioning of vedolizumab and adalimumab, leveraging the results of the landmark head-to-head VARSITY clinical trial as key inputs. The robustness of the results was investigated through a range of sensitivity and scenario analyses.
RESULTS
The strategy of vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy followed by adalimumab was associated with higher costs and health benefits compared with first-line adalimumab followed by vedolizumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €16,146/QALY, which was found to be robust to changes to inputs associated with areas of high uncertainty.
CONCLUSION
This economic evaluation estimated a 94% probability that vedolizumab as a first-line advanced therapy is cost-effective at a threshold of €33,004/QALY when compared with first-line adalimumab sequences. Using clinical trial evidence to inform the efficacy of second-line treatments estimated that the effectiveness of anti-TNFα treatments is not substantially reduced by vedolizumab exposure.
PubMed: 38858333
DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00497-4 -
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Jun 2024To report a case of presumed fungal infection in a patient with JIA following prolong immunosuppression, and after initiation of adalimumab therapy. Method:...
PURPOSE
To report a case of presumed fungal infection in a patient with JIA following prolong immunosuppression, and after initiation of adalimumab therapy. Method: Retrospective Chart Review.
RESULT
A 20-year-old female, previously diagnosed with JIA, presented with a three-week history of blurred vision in her left eye. She had a long history of treatment with oral corticosteroids, sulfasalazine, and methotrexate, followed by tocilizumab injections and later etanercept. Recently, she was started on adalimumab injections. Fundus examination of the left eye demonstrated multifocal retinitis scattered throughout the fundus. Optical coherence tomography of the lesions showed hyperreflectivity in the inner retina with posterior shadowing and vitreous aggregates extending into the vitreous cavity. After her second adalimumab dose, she experienced blurred vision. Examination of the fundus revealed multifocal retinitis in the left eye, sparing the macula. After stopping immunomodulators and starting empirical antifungal therapy with oral fluconazole, her retinal lesions began to improve. A vitreous biopsy was performed, and intravitreal voriconazole was administered, but microbiological tests were negative. Nevertheless, her retinal lesions resolved almost completely with continued antifungal treatment. By the 6-week follow-up, her retinitis had fully resolved, maintaining excellent visual acuity.
CONCLUSION
This case underscores the need for a high index of suspicion for infection in patients with long-term immunosuppression, highlighting the importance of early therapeutic intervention.
PubMed: 38856750
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2024.2361355 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research May 2024Monotherapy with a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor or intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) has been limited to patients with intractable...
Monotherapy with a selective Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor or intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) has been limited to patients with intractable ulcerative colitis (UC). No previous reports have described the efficacy including histopathological evaluations and the safety of combination therapy with upadacitinib (UPA) plus intensive GMA (two sessions per week) for intractable UC showing resistance to conventional agents and adalimumab. This retrospective study evaluated the 10-week clinical and histopathological efficacy of induction combination therapy with UPA plus intensive GMA in patients with intractable UC. Among eight patients (moderate UC, n = 1; severe UC, n = 7) who received combination therapy with UPA plus intensive GMA, 50.0% had achieved clinical remission by 10 weeks. Percentages of patients with histological-endoscopic mucosal improvement and mucosal healing at 10 weeks were 62.5% and 12.5%, respectively. After excluding one patient who discontinued treatment by week 10 because of intolerance for UPA, mean full Mayo score, endoscopic subscore and C-reactive protein concentration at baseline were 11.43 ± 0.37, 3 ± 0 and 1.29 ± 0.70 mg/dL, respectively. Corresponding values at 10 weeks were 2.28 ± 0.77 (P < 0.03), 1.14 ± 0.34 (P < 0.03) and 0.03 ± 0.008 mg/dL (P < 0.05), respectively. Adverse events of herpes zoster, temporary increase in creatinine phosphokinase and anemia were observed in one patient each. One patient discontinued combination therapy at week 4 because of temporary taste abnormality due to UPA. Combination comprising UPA plus intensive GMA appears likely to achieve satisfactory induction of clinical remission and histopathological improvement for patients with intractable UC for whom conventional agents and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α antibody have failed.
PubMed: 38855784
DOI: 10.14740/jocmr5165 -
Patient Preference and Adherence 2024Medication delivery device design impacts treatment satisfaction, adherence, and compliance in patients receiving biologics. This survey assessed autoinjector attributes...
PURPOSE
Medication delivery device design impacts treatment satisfaction, adherence, and compliance in patients receiving biologics. This survey assessed autoinjector attributes that are important to patients, and assessed patient perceptions and preferences between an adalimumab biosimilar autoinjector (Hyrimoz SensoReady Pen [SDZ-ADL pen]) and the reference adalimumab autoinjector (Humira Pen [ref-ADL pen]) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Crohn's disease (CD) in Canada.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In this survey, adult patients were recruited for web-assisted telephone interviews. Patients had ≥ 3 months' experience with the ref-ADL pen and 1-12 months' experience with the SDZ-ADL pen.
RESULTS
The survey included 120 patients with RA (n = 32) or CD (n = 88). Mean experience with the ref-ADL pen was 7 years for RA or 5 years for CD vs 9 months with the SDZ-ADL pen. The most important autoinjector attributes were the ability to use the pen independently and the ease and simplicity of self-injection. When comparing the two autoinjectors, patients significantly preferred the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen for nearly every attribute evaluated, with the greatest differences reported for visual and audible feedback mechanisms, ease of self-injection, and ability to use the device independently. Overall, 82% of patients preferred the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen, with buttonless activation and less injection pain being the main drivers for this preference.
CONCLUSION
Patients with RA or CD indicated a preference for the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen, independent of the duration of use of the pen. The preference for a biosimilar device within 1 year of switching provides reassurance of rapid patient acceptance of biosimilars and may simplify the switching process. These results confirm the importance of ensuring autoinjector design supports independent self-administration of medication and align with previous data showing high patient satisfaction with the SDZ-ADL pen.
PubMed: 38854477
DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S455791 -
BMC Ophthalmology Jun 2024This study explores prognostic factors influencing Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease and observes the efficacy and safety of Adalimumab (ADA) in treating recurrence in...
BACKGROUND
This study explores prognostic factors influencing Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease and observes the efficacy and safety of Adalimumab (ADA) in treating recurrence in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) patients.
METHODS
A retrospective study was conducted on all patients diagnosed with VKH disease at Beijing Tongren Hospital between 2020 and 2023. Clinical data included initial and final visual acuity, age, gender, ocular complications, treatment modalities, disease duration, and recurrence frequency.
RESULTS
A total of 62 VKH patients were included, comprising 34 in the acute-resolved group and 28 in the chronic-recurrent group. The mean age of patients in the acute-resolved group was 38.29 ± 15.46 years, while the mean age of chronic-recurrent group had a 49.00 ± 16.43 years. Initial best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) examination at the first visit showed an average BCVA of 0.64 ± 0.29 logMAR in the acute-resolved group and 1.38 ± 0.54 logMAR in the chronic-recurrent group (p = 0.002). During follow-up, ocular complications were observed in 29.4% of the acute-resolved group patients and 41.7% of the chronic-recurrent group patients (P = 0.006). "Sunset glow fundus" was observed in 23.5% of the acute-resolved group and 64.3% of the chronic-recurrent group patients (P = 0.001). Poor initial BCVA (P = 0.046) and the occurrence of "sunset glow fundus" (P = 0.040) were significantly associated with progression to the chronic recurrent phase. Logistic regression analysis revealed that older age at onset (P = 0.042) and the occurrence of "sunset glow fundus" (P = 0.037) were significant predictors for progression to the chronic recurrent phase. ADA significantly reduced anterior chamber inflammatory cells (P = 0.000) and vitreous cavity inflammatory cells (P = 0.001) in the chronic-recurrent group, and markedly decreased the recurrence rate in VKH patients (P = 0.009).
CONCLUSION
In comparison to acute-resolved patients, chronic-recurrent patients exhibited poorer initial BCVA and a significantly increased incidence of "sunset glow fundus." Older age at onset and the occurrence of "sunset glow fundus" at diagnosis are crucial predictive factors for VKH patients progressing to the chronic recurrent phase. ADA effectively alleviates refractory VKH disease and is generally well-tolerated.
Topics: Humans; Uveomeningoencephalitic Syndrome; Adalimumab; Female; Male; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Visual Acuity; Chronic Disease; Young Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Adolescent; Treatment Outcome; Aged; Prognosis
PubMed: 38849758
DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03511-9 -
Ocular Immunology and Inflammation Jun 2024
PubMed: 38848044
DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2024.2362879 -
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and... Jun 2024There has been a call to action to enhance representation of non-white individuals in dermatology clinical trials. Investigations in differential response to treatment... (Review)
Review
There has been a call to action to enhance representation of non-white individuals in dermatology clinical trials. Investigations in differential response to treatment across populations are limited, particularly in conditions of commonality, impact, distinct presentation, and diagnosis in non-white participants, such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. This systematic review summarized and identified if biologic treatment outcomes in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and psoriasis varied in skin of colour (SOC) participants in phase 3 trials. MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and EMBASE databases were used to conduct the search following PROSPERO registration. Following screening of 3209 articles, 11 studies were collected with 1781 SOC participants with a mean age of 40.99 ± 6.3 years (range: 30.6-51.6 years). Male participants accounted for 76.9% (n = 1370/1781) of the sample, and Chinese, Japanese, Taiwanese, and Korean participants accounted for 64.3%, 24.2%, 4.5%, and 3.4% of participants, respectively. Participants with atopic dermatitis were treated with dupilumab (n = 216/388) and participants with psoriasis were treated with adalimumab (n = 313/1393), bimekizumab (n = 62/1393), ixekizumab (n = 13/1393), secukinumab (n = 117/1393), and ustekinumab (n = 289/1393). No significant SOC population-based outcomes were found across treatment groups. However, differences in baseline characteristics or comorbidities were found, suggesting race or ethnic background should be considered when treatment is prescribed in psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Although no significant SOC participant differential response to treatment were found, large-scale randomized controlled trials investigating comparable treatment outcomes and stratifying results by SOC population in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis are warranted to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 38847375
DOI: 10.1177/12034754241260023 -
Protein and Peptide Letters Jun 2024TNF-α is a proinflammatory cytokine and plays a role in cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, and death pathways. When administered at high doses, it may cause...
BACKGROUND
TNF-α is a proinflammatory cytokine and plays a role in cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, and death pathways. When administered at high doses, it may cause damage to the tumor vasculature, thereby increasing the permeability of the blood vessels. Therefore, monitoring the dose and the response of the TNF-α molecule is essential for patients' health.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to clone, express, and purify the active form of the TNF-α protein, which can interact with various anti-TNF-α inhibitors with high efficiency.
METHODS
Recombinant DNA technology was used to clone three different versions of codon-optimized human TNF-α sequences to E. coli. Colony PCR protocol was used for verification and produced proteins were analyzed through SDS-PAGE and western blot. Size exclusion chromatography was used to purify sTNF-α. ELISA techniques were used to analyze and compare binding efficiency of sTNF-α against three different standards.
RESULTS
Under native condition (25°C), interaction between sTNF-α and anti-TNF-α antibody was 3,970, compared to positive control. The interaction was 0,587, whereas it was 0,535 for TNF- α and anti-TNF-α antibodies under denaturing conditions (37°C). F7 of sTNF-α (920 μg/mL) had the same/higher binding efficiency to adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, compared to commercial TNF-α.
CONCLUSION
This study was the first to analyze binding efficiency of homemade sTNF-α protein against three major TNF-α inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab) in a single study. The high binding efficiency of sTNF-α with adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, evidenced in this study supports the feasibility of its use in therapeutic applications, contributing to more sustainable, cost-effective, and independent healthcare system.
PubMed: 38847260
DOI: 10.2174/0109298665312592240516111404 -
Pathology Oncology Research : POR 2024Acquired Hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by the emergence of inhibitors that specifically target coagulation Factor VIII, frequently...
INTRODUCTION
Acquired Hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by the emergence of inhibitors that specifically target coagulation Factor VIII, frequently resulting in severe bleeding episodes.
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the medical records of a 68-year-old male patient who presented with adalimumab-induced AHA.
RESULTS
The patient received adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor antibody, as part of his treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. The patient's clinical journey, characterized by intense bleeding and coagulopathy, was effectively managed with the application of recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and the CyDRi protocol.
DISCUSSION
The case emphasizes the importance of prompt coagulation assessment in patients with bleeding symptoms receiving disease-modifying therapy for rheumatoid arthritis that includes adalimumab therapy, considering the rare yet life-threatening nature of AHA. Additionally, this report provides an extensive review of the existing literature on drug-induced AHA, with a special emphasis on cases linked to immunomodulatory medications. Through this two-pronged approach, our report aims to enhance understanding and awareness of this severe complication among healthcare providers, promoting timely diagnosis and intervention.
Topics: Humans; Hemophilia A; Male; Aged; Adalimumab; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Factor VIIa; Antirheumatic Agents; Rituximab; Retrospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins
PubMed: 38846411
DOI: 10.3389/pore.2024.1611720 -
The Lancet. Rheumatology Jul 2024For cost-saving purposes, children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are being switched (for non-medical reasons) from biological originators to...
Outcomes after anti-tumour necrosis factor originator to biosimilar switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the UK: a national cohort study.
BACKGROUND
For cost-saving purposes, children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are being switched (for non-medical reasons) from biological originators to biosimilars. Here, we aimed to investigate those who switched from an anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) originator to a biosimilar, regarding drug survival and disease activity, compared with a matched cohort who continued the originator.
METHODS
This analysis included all patients in the UK JIA Biologics Register switching directly from an anti-TNF originator to a biosimilar of the same product. All patients were matched (age, sex, disease duration, calendar year of when patients started originator therapy, line of therapy, and International League of Associations for Rheumatology [ILAR] category) to patients continuing the originator. For those matched successfully, a Cox proportional hazard model assessed whether drug persistence differed between those who switched compared with those who continued the originator. Overall change in the 71-joint juvenile arthritis disease activity score and the proportion of patients with a clinically important worsening score (by ≥1·7 units) after 6 months was compared between cohorts. This analysis was designed to address a priority research area set by our patient partners.
FINDINGS
There were 224 children and young people with non-systemic JIA (139 [62%] were female, and 85 [38%] were male) identified as switching from a biological originator to a biosimilar of the same product from Jan 1, 2017, to July 7, 2023. 143 (64%) patients were originally on adalimumab, 56 (25%) on etanercept, and 25 (11%) on infliximab. Of these, 164 patients were matched successfully to those continuing the originator. There was no evidence that patients switching were more likely to stop treatment compared with those continuing the originator, with a hazard ratio of 1·46 (95% CI 0·93-2·30). Of the 51 patients in the biosimilar group who stopped treatment, 18 (35%) switched back to the originator (14 in the first year), 28 (55%) started a different biological drug, and five (10%) discontinued all treatment by the last follow-up. Of the 87 matched patients with available disease activity, there was no evidence that JADAS-71 worsened more after 6 months, with an odds ratio of 0·71 (95% CI 0·34-1·51; p=0·38).
INTERPRETATION
In this matched comparative effectiveness analysis, children and young people with JIA switched from originators to biosimilars. Disease activity was similar between patients switching compared with those continuing the originator. Three quarters of patients were still receiving their biosimilar after 1 year, with switching back to originator uncommon, at only 9% after 1 year, suggesting good tolerability of non-medical switching in this patient population. This information is reassuring to clinicians and patients regarding the effect of non-medical biological switching.
FUNDING
British Society for Rheumatology, Versus Arthritis, and National Institutes for Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.
Topics: Humans; Arthritis, Juvenile; Male; Female; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Child; Adolescent; Drug Substitution; Antirheumatic Agents; United Kingdom; Cohort Studies; Treatment Outcome; Child, Preschool; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Infliximab; Adalimumab; Etanercept; Biological Products
PubMed: 38843858
DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00087-0