-
The American Journal of Nursing Oct 2023Oral complications from cancer treatments are among the adverse effects breast cancer survivors can face. Yet such complications are often overlooked in cancer...
BACKGROUND
Oral complications from cancer treatments are among the adverse effects breast cancer survivors can face. Yet such complications are often overlooked in cancer survivorship care. Many breast cancer survivors are receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy, but there is limited understanding of potential oral complications from this therapy.
PURPOSE
This study aimed to compare aspects of oral health in female breast cancer survivors who were taking adjuvant endocrine therapy with those of survivors not taking such therapy.
METHODS
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data collected from January 2009 through March 2020 were used for the analysis. Female adults ages 20 years and older who had been diagnosed with breast cancer were included. Linear regression and χ 2 analyses were conducted to examine aspects of oral health, using IBM SPSS Complex Samples software, version 27.
RESULTS
In our sample of 423 female breast cancer survivors, 7.1% were taking tamoxifen, 7.8% were taking anastrozole, 4.3% were taking letrozole, and 2.9% were taking exemestane. Compared with the survivors not taking such therapy, a greater proportion of those taking it had decayed teeth, gum disease/problems, and were recommended for imminent dental care after oral health examination by dentists. The survivors who were not taking adjuvant endocrine therapy had more coronal cavities.
CONCLUSIONS
Data analysis showed that female breast cancer survivors taking adjuvant endocrine therapy appear more likely to have oral health issues than those not taking such therapy. Improved awareness of these issues is critical. Assessment and management guidelines to address these oral health issues are needed by health care providers.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Oral Health; Cancer Survivors; Nutrition Surveys; Survivors
PubMed: 37678330
DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000978924.32557.53 -
The Lancet. Oncology Sep 2023The development of more potent selective oestrogen receptor antagonists and degraders (SERDs) that can be orally administered could help to address the limitations of... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Neoadjuvant palbociclib plus either giredestrant or anastrozole in oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, early breast cancer (coopERA Breast Cancer): an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study.
BACKGROUND
The development of more potent selective oestrogen receptor antagonists and degraders (SERDs) that can be orally administered could help to address the limitations of current endocrine therapies. We report the primary and final analyses of the coopERA Breast Cancer study, designed to test whether giredestrant, a highly potent, non-steroidal, oral SERD, would show a stronger anti-proliferative effect than anastrozole after 2 weeks for oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer.
METHODS
In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study, postmenopausal women were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older; had clinical T stage (cT)1c to cT4a-c (≥1·5 cm within cT1c) oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, untreated early breast cancer; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1; and baseline Ki67 score of at least 5%. The study was conducted at 59 hospital or clinic sites in 11 countries globally. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to giredestrant 30 mg oral daily or anastrozole 1 mg oral daily on days 1-14 (window-of-opportunity phase) via an interactive web-based system with permuted-block randomisation with block size of four. Randomisation was stratified by cT stage, baseline Ki67 score, and progesterone receptor status. A 16-week neoadjuvant phase comprised the same regimen plus palbociclib 125 mg oral daily on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, for four cycles. The primary endpoint was geometric mean relative Ki67 score change from baseline to week 2 in patients with complete central Ki67 scores at baseline and week 2 (window-of-opportunity phase). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04436744) and is complete.
FINDINGS
Between Sept 4, 2020, and June 22, 2021, 221 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the giredestrant plus palbociclib group (n=112; median age 62·0 years [IQR 57·0-68·5]) or anastrozole plus palbociclib group (n=109; median age 62·0 [57·0-67·0] years). 15 (7%) of 221 patients were Asian, three (1%) were Black or African American, 194 (88%) were White, and nine (4%) were unknown races. At data cutoff for the primary analysis (July 19, 2021), the geometric mean relative reduction of Ki67 from baseline to week 2 was -75% (95% CI -80 to -70) with giredestrant and -67% (-73 to -59) with anastrozole (p=0·043), meeting the primary endpoint. At the final analysis (data cutoff Nov 24, 2021), the most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (29 [26%] of 112 in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group vs 29 [27%] of 109 in the anastrozole plus palbociclib group) and decreased neutrophil count (17 [15%] vs 16 [15%]). Serious adverse events occurred in five (4%) patients in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group and in two (2%) patients in the anastrozole plus palbociclib group. There were no treatment-related deaths. One patient died due to an adverse event in the giredestrant plus palbociclib group (myocardial infarction).
INTERPRETATION
Giredestrant offers encouraging anti-proliferative and anti-tumour activity and was well tolerated, both as a single agent and in combination with palbociclib. Results justify further investigation in ongoing trials.
FUNDING
F Hoffmann-La Roche.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Anastrozole; Breast Neoplasms; Receptors, Estrogen; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Ki-67 Antigen
PubMed: 37657462
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00268-1 -
International Journal of... Jan 2023Several studies showed the superiority of aromatase inhibitor (AI) as first-line therapy for patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC). For the...
Several studies showed the superiority of aromatase inhibitor (AI) as first-line therapy for patients with hormone-receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC). For the clinician, studies in the real world are warranted to determine treatment based on the efficacy of each drug. We compared a 5-y disease-free survival (DFS) of each AI in terms of survival benefit. We evaluated 450 medical records of postmenopausal women who were diagnosed with HR-positive HER2-negative BC (stage I - III) at Dr. Sardjito General Hospital from January to December 2019. All patients had undergone surgery and chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Moreover, study participants received anastrozole, letrozole, or exemestane for at least one year. Kaplan Meier estimation survival curve was used to analyze the survival rate. Of 79 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were 21.52% distant metastases documented. Time to disease progression of anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane was 49 months, 58 months, and 53 months, respectively. Letrozole was found better than anastrozole (hazard ratio (HR)=4.342, 95% CI 0.95-19.95; p=0.038). Letrozole versus exemestane (HR=2.757, 95% CI 0.53-14.33; p=0,206) and anastrozole versus exemestane (HR=1.652, 95% CI 0.56-4.84; p=0.351) were found not significantly different. 5-y DFS rate of letrozole was better found (87.5%) than exemestane (73.7%) and anastrozole (61.4%). 5-year letrozole administration could be proposed as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with HR-positive HER2-negative BC. A considerable subject and long-term follow-up are needed for validation.
PubMed: 37638281
DOI: 10.18502/ijhoscr.v17i1.11713 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2023Female breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Risk assessment helps to identify women at increased risk of breast cancer and allows the... (Review)
Review
Female breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide. Risk assessment helps to identify women at increased risk of breast cancer and allows the adoption of a comprehensive approach to reducing breast cancer incidence through personalized interventions, including lifestyle modification, chemoprevention, intensified surveillance with breast imaging, genetic counseling, and testing. Primary prevention means acting on modifiable risk factors to reduce breast cancer occurrence. Chemoprevention with tamoxifen, raloxifene, anastrozole, and exemestane has already shown benefits in decreasing breast cancer incidence in women at an increased risk for breast cancer. For healthy women carrying BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline variants, the efficacy of chemoprevention is still controversial. Adopting chemoprevention strategies and the choice among agents should depend on the safety profile and risk-benefit ratio. Unfortunately, the uptake of these agents has been low. Lifestyle modifications can reduce breast cancer incidence, and the recommendations for BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 P/LP germline variant carriers are comparable to the general population. This review summarizes the most recent evidence regarding the efficacy of chemoprevention and lifestyle interventions in women with sporadic and hereditary breast cancer.
PubMed: 37628558
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162360 -
Pharmacogenomics Aug 2023This study tested associations of genotype-predicted activity of CYP3A4, other pharmacogenes, (rs11648166) and (rs28845026) with systemic concentrations of the...
This study tested associations of genotype-predicted activity of CYP3A4, other pharmacogenes, (rs11648166) and (rs28845026) with systemic concentrations of the endocrine therapies anastrozole and fulvestrant in SWOG S0226 trial participants. Participants in the anastrozole-only arm with low CYP3A4 activity (i.e. carriers) had higher systemic anastrozole concentrations than patients with high CYP3A4 activity (β-coefficient = 10.03; 95% CI: 1.42, 18.6; p = 0.025). In an exploratory analysis, participants with low CYP2C9 activity had lower anastrozole concentrations and higher fulvestrant concentrations than participants with high CYP2C9 activity. Inherited genetic variation in and may affect concentrations of endocrine therapy and may be useful to personalize dosing and improve treatment outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Female; Anastrozole; Fulvestrant; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A; Nitriles; Triazoles; Estradiol; Genotype; Breast Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal
PubMed: 37615099
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0097 -
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Oct 2023Enlargement of breasts among boys is termed gynecomastia. This could be due to an alteration in the androgen-estrogen ratio along with the effects of other hormones... (Review)
Review
Enlargement of breasts among boys is termed gynecomastia. This could be due to an alteration in the androgen-estrogen ratio along with the effects of other hormones including growth hormone, insulin like growth factor 1, prolactin, and other factors affecting aromatase enzyme. The common causes of gynecomastia are pubertal gynecomastia, obesity, drugs and hypogonadism. Several other diseases including liver or renal failure, thyrotoxicosis, Klinefelter syndrome, tumors and environmental pollutants can cause gynecomastia. History and clinical examination will help formulate targeted investigations and management. The factors to be evaluated in these include examination of breasts and testes, in addition to other parts of systemic examination. Treatment of underlying disorders can improve gynecomastia, such as use of testosterone in hypogonadism. Some boys may not need any intervention as gynecomastia may resolve on its own. Medical management is useful in simple gynecomastia. Tamoxifen has been tried successfully in adolescents with gynecomastia. Other drugs including clomiphene, danazol, letrozole and anastrozole have not been consistently useful in this age group. In severe chronic gynecomastia, surgery is the treatment of choice.
Topics: Adolescent; Male; Humans; Gynecomastia; Hypertrophy; Tamoxifen; Growth Hormone; Hypogonadism
PubMed: 37592101
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-023-04810-7 -
The Journal of Pathology Oct 2023Aromatase inhibitors (Ais) are used as adjuvant endocrine therapy for oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+ve) post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Ais, by inhibiting the...
Aromatase inhibitors (Ais) are used as adjuvant endocrine therapy for oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+ve) post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Ais, by inhibiting the enzyme aromatase, block the conversion of androgen to oestrogen, reducing oestrogen levels. Resistance to Ais limits their clinical utilisation. Here, we show that overexpression of BQ323636.1 (BQ), a novel splice variant of nuclear co-repressor NCOR2, is associated with resistance to the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in ER+ve post-menopausal breast cancer. Mechanistic study indicates that BQ overexpression enhances androgen receptor (AR) activity and in the presence of anastrozole, causes hyper-activation of AR signalling, which unexpectedly enhanced cell proliferation, through increased expression of CDK2, CDK4, and CCNE1. BQ overexpression reverses the effect of anastrozole in ER+ve breast cancer in an AR-dependent manner, whilst co-treatment with the AR antagonist bicalutamide recovered its therapeutic effect both in vitro and in vivo. Thus, for BQ-overexpressing breast cancer, targeting AR can combat anastrozole resistance. Clinical study of 268 primary breast cancer samples of ER+ve patients who had been treated with non-steroidal Ais showed 32.5% (38/117) of cases with combined high nuclear expression of BQ and AR, which were found to be significantly associated with Ai resistance. Non-steroidal Ai-treated patients with high nuclear expression of both BQ and AR had poorer overall, disease-specific, and disease-free survival. These findings suggest the importance of assessing BQ and AR expression status in the primary ER+ve breast tumour prior to Ai treatment. This may save patients from inappropriate treatment and enable effective therapy to be given at an early stage. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Topics: Humans; Female; Anastrozole; Breast Neoplasms; Aromatase Inhibitors; Estrogens; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 37555303
DOI: 10.1002/path.6157 -
Pediatric Cardiology Feb 2024Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are increasingly used in children and adolescents to augment adult height. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects AIs have on... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are increasingly used in children and adolescents to augment adult height. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects AIs have on cardiac morphology, functions and their relation to several metabolic parameters in adolescent boys.
METHODS
Three groups matched for sex (boys, n = 67), age (median age 13.5 years), weight, height, body mass index, and puberty stages were enrolled: (i) Group 1: 23 patients using AIs (only AI (n = 6) or in combination with growth hormone (GH) (n = 17)) for at least 6 months; (ii) Group 2: 22 patients using only GH, and (iii) Group 3: 22 healthy boys. Two-dimensional, M-mode conventional Doppler and tissue Doppler examinations of the left ventricle (LV) were performed. Bioelectrical bioimpedance analyses was conducted and follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, total testosterone, lipid, and hemogram parameters were obtained.
RESULTS
Patients in Group 1 had significantly higher serum total testosterone (p < 0.001) and hemoglobin (p < 0.001) levels, fat free mass (p = 0.005), LV mass (LVM) (p = 0.002), as well as increased LV posterior wall diameter (LVPWD) (p = 0.002), interventricular septum diameter (IVSD) (p = 0.019), and myocardial systolic wave velocity (Sm) (p = 0.020) compared to the two other control groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of diastolic and systolic functions and lipid profiles (p > 0.05). There were positive correlations between total testosterone, hemoglobin levels, LVM, LVPWD and IVSD (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
Increased LVM, LVPWD, IVSD and Sm of patients receiving AI therapy in comparison to the control groups, and the significant correlations of these parameters with total testosterone and hemoglobin levels were determined as potential side effects of AIs. These findings emphasize the need of routine cardiac follow-up in patients using AIs.
Topics: Male; Child; Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Aromatase Inhibitors; Human Growth Hormone; Testosterone; Lipids; Hemoglobins; Cardiovascular Diseases
PubMed: 37544952
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-023-03260-4 -
Fertility and Sterility Oct 2023
Topics: Male; Humans; Anastrozole; Aromatase Inhibitors; Infertility, Male; Infertility
PubMed: 37532167
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.07.023 -
Fertility and Sterility Aug 2023
PubMed: 37517853
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.06.017