-
Discriminative Ability of Left Ventricular Strain in Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure.JACC. Advances Nov 2023Left ventricular (LV) systolic strain is presumably a more sensitive myocardial indicator than LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Data regarding the use of LV strain in...
BACKGROUND
Left ventricular (LV) systolic strain is presumably a more sensitive myocardial indicator than LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Data regarding the use of LV strain in clinical risk stratification and in identifying angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) responders remain scarce in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).
OBJECTIVES
The authors aimed to examine whether assessing LV strain may provide prognostic insight beyond LVEF and help discriminate the therapeutic efficacy of ARNi in HFmrEF patients.
METHODS
LVEF and LV strain were quantified among 1,075 first-time hospitalized HFmrEF patients (mean age: 68.1 ± 15.1 years, 40% female). The MAGGIC (Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure) risk score and its components were calculated. A Cox proportional hazard model was constructed for time-to-event analysis. Restrictive cubic spline curves were used to model the therapeutic effects of ARNi against renin-angiotensin system inhibitor according to baseline LVEF or LV strain.
RESULTS
LV strain showed a statistically significant inverse association with MAGGIC cardiac risk (coefficient: -0.14, < 0.001). LV strain was independently associated with clinical outcomes after accounting for LVEF. MAGGIC-LV strain strata outperformed MAGGIC-LVEF strata in overall survival (Harrell's C-index: 0.71 and 0.56, for difference <0.001; category-free net reclassification index: 0.44, < 0.001). Lower LV strain but not LVEF consistently showed the beneficial therapeutic effects of ARNi against renin-angiotensin system inhibitor by Cox models and restrictive cubic spline (all <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Among HFmrEF patients, LV strain may serve as an attractive systolic marker and provide a better prognostic and therapeutic discriminative measure for ARNi treatment than conventional LVEF.
PubMed: 38938730
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100654 -
JACC. Advances Jun 2023
PubMed: 38938244
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100388 -
JACC. Advances Jun 2023Recent trial data refute concerns about neurocognitive off-target effects of neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril and suggest benefit in patients with heart failure and...
BACKGROUND
Recent trial data refute concerns about neurocognitive off-target effects of neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril and suggest benefit in patients with heart failure and ejection fraction >40%. We hypothesized that sacubitril/valsartan is associated with improved cognitive outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year cognitive outcomes in patients with HFrEF who receive sacubitril/valsartan vs angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs).
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study of: 1) 11,313 adults with HFrEF (International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision-Clinical Modification [ICD-10-CM] codes: I50.2 or I50.4) started on sacubitril/valsartan between 1/1/2015 and 12/31/2019; and 2) 11,313 propensity matched patients receiving ACEI/ARB during that time. Data were obtained from the TriNetX Research Network, encompassing 41 health care organizations in the United States. Primary endpoint was the composite of cognitive decline (ICD-10-CM: R41.8), dementia (ICD-10-CM: F01-F03), and Alzheimer's disease (ICD-10-CM: G30).
RESULTS
At 3 years, 858 patients on sacubitril/valsartan met the primary endpoint vs 1,209 on ACEI/ARB (3-year incidence: 10.7% vs 15.0%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.75; < 0.001), with consistently lower rates of cognitive decline (9.5% vs 13.3%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.63-0.76; < 0.001), dementia (3.4% vs 5.0%; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.57-0.77; < 0.001), and Alzheimer's disease (0.6% vs 1.3%; HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.35-0.66; < 0.001) in the sacubitril/valsartan cohort. Results were consistent in matched sex and race subgroups. Three-year mortality was 22.0% on sacubitril/valsartan vs 24.6% on ACEI/ARB (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.94; < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower 3-year rates of neurocognitive disorders when compared to ACEI/ARBs in patients with HFrEF.
PubMed: 38938237
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100372 -
The Senior Care Pharmacist Jul 2024The objective of this analysis is to investigate the risk of hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients using sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (Co-trimoxazole) and a... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
The objective of this analysis is to investigate the risk of hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients using sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (Co-trimoxazole) and a potassium-sparing drug (potassium-sparing diuretic or renin-angiotensin system [RAS]-inhibitor). Researchers conducted a nested case control study within a cohort of hospitalized patients using a potassium-sparing diuretic and/or a RAS-inhibitor from the PHARMO Database Network. Researchers estimated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of hyperkalemia in patients receiving both Co-trimoxazole and a potassium-sparing drug compared with patients only receiving a potassium-sparing drug. Among a cohort of 25,849 patients, researchers identified 2054 cases of hyperkalemia during hospitalization in patients also using a potassium-sparing drug. Using Co-trimoxazole in addition to a potassium-sparing drug was associated with an increased risk of hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.26-2.16) compared with using only a potassium-sparing drug. There was a trend of a more pronounced association between hyperkalemia and the co-use of Co-trimoxazole and potassium-sparing drugs in patients with an estimated GFR of 15-29 mL/min (OR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.29-7.70). The number needed to harm for hyperkalemia induced by adding Co-trimoxazole to patients receiving a potassium-sparing drug is 19.5. Using the combination of Co-trimoxazole with a potassium-sparing drug in hospitalized patients increases the risk of hyperkalemia compared with using only a potassium-sparing drug. Physicians and other prescribers should be aware of hyperkalemia and routinely monitor serum potassium levels in hospitalized patients using this combination of drugs.
Topics: Hyperkalemia; Humans; Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination; Male; Female; Aged; Hospitalization; Middle Aged; Case-Control Studies; Diuretics, Potassium Sparing; Cohort Studies; Aged, 80 and over; Potassium; Adult
PubMed: 38937893
DOI: 10.4140/TCP.n.2024.259 -
BMC Nephrology Jun 2024Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic inflammatory disease, characterized by the presence of non-caseating, epithelioid granulomas. Glomerular disease in patients with...
BACKGROUND
Sarcoidosis is a multisystemic inflammatory disease, characterized by the presence of non-caseating, epithelioid granulomas. Glomerular disease in patients with sarcoidosis is rare and membranous nephropathy (MN) is cited as the most common. The association between the two diseases remained unclear. This article reported a case of co-occurrence of sarcoidosis and anti-PLA2R-associated MN, to provide a possible relationship between these two entities.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 61-year-old Chinese Han woman with a history of sarcoidosis was admitted to our hospital for nephrotic syndrome. Her sarcoidosis was diagnosed according to the adenopathy observed on the computed tomography scan and the biopsy of lymph nodes. The MN presented with nephrotic syndrome with a PLA2R antibody titer of 357RU/ml, and the final diagnosis was based on a renal biopsy. The patient's sarcoidosis was remitted after treatment with prednisone. One year later MN was diagnosed, and she was treated with prednisone combined with calcineurin inhibitors, based on a full dose of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor. The patient's sarcoidosis had been in remission while the MN was recurrent, and her renal function deteriorated to end-stage renal disease 6 years later due to discontinuation of immunosuppression. A genetic test led to the identification of the HLA-DRB1*0301 and HLA-DRB1*150 genes associated with both sarcoidosis and MN, which provides a new possible explanation of the co-occurrence of these two diseases.
CONCLUSION
This case suggested for the first time a potential genetic connection between idiopathic MN and sarcoidosis which needs further studies in the future.
Topics: Humans; Glomerulonephritis, Membranous; Female; Middle Aged; Receptors, Phospholipase A2; Sarcoidosis; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Autoantibodies
PubMed: 38937663
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03649-0 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024There is no treatment for acute aortic dissection (AAD) targeting inflammatory cells. We aimed to identify the new therapeutic targets associated with inflammatory...
There is no treatment for acute aortic dissection (AAD) targeting inflammatory cells. We aimed to identify the new therapeutic targets associated with inflammatory cells. We characterized the specific distribution of myeloid cells of both human type A AAD samples and a murine AAD model generated using angiotensin II (ANGII) and β-aminopropionitrile (BAPN) by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). We also examined the effect of an anti-interleukin-1β (IL-1β) antibody in the murine AAD model. IL1B inflammatory macrophages and classical monocytes were increased in human AAD samples. Trajectory analysis demonstrated that IL1B inflammatory macrophages differentiated from S100A8/9/12 classical monocytes uniquely observed in the aorta of AAD. We found increased infiltration of neutrophils and monocytes with the expression of inflammatory cytokines in the aorta and accumulation of inflammatory macrophages before the onset of macroscopic AAD in the murine AAD model. In blocking experiments using an anti-IL-1β antibody, it improved survival of murine AAD model by preventing elastin degradation. We observed the accumulation of inflammatory macrophages expressing IL-1β in both human AAD samples and in a murine AAD model. Anti-IL-1β antibody could improve the mortality rate in mice, suggesting that it may be a treatment option for AAD.
Topics: Aortic Dissection; Interleukin-1beta; Animals; Humans; Macrophages; Mice; Disease Models, Animal; Male; Aminopropionitrile; Angiotensin II; Inflammation; Monocytes; Aorta; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Female
PubMed: 38937528
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65931-3 -
Cell Death & Disease Jun 2024SARS-CoV-2 infection is initiated by Spike glycoprotein binding to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor via its receptor binding domain. Blocking...
SARS-CoV-2 infection is initiated by Spike glycoprotein binding to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor via its receptor binding domain. Blocking this interaction has been proven to be an effective approach to inhibit virus infection. Here we report the discovery of a neutralizing nanobody named VHH60, which was directly produced from an engineering nanobody library based on a commercialized nanobody within a very short period. VHH60 competes with human ACE2 to bind the receptor binding domain of the Spike protein at S, Sand S as determined by structural analysis, with an affinity of 2.56 nM. It inhibits infections of both ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and pseudotyped viruses harboring SARS-CoV-2 wildtype, key mutations or variants at the nanomolar level. Furthermore, VHH60 suppressed SARS-CoV-2 infection and propagation 50-fold better and protected mice from death for twice as long as the control group after SARS-CoV-2 nasal infections in vivo. Therefore, VHH60 is not only a powerful nanobody with a promising profile for disease control but also provides evidence for a highly effective and rapid approach to generating therapeutic nanobodies.
Topics: SARS-CoV-2; Single-Domain Antibodies; Humans; Animals; COVID-19; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus; Mice; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Antibodies, Neutralizing; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Antibodies, Viral; HEK293 Cells; Mice, Inbred BALB C; Protein Binding; Female
PubMed: 38937437
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-06802-7 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Jul 2024Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was reported in December 2019 and rapidly became a pandemic as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Apart... (Review)
Review
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was reported in December 2019 and rapidly became a pandemic as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Apart from other organs, presence of specific receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE2) and corresponding proteases such as transmembrane serine protease 2, basigin and cysteine protease cathepsin L make follicular somatic cells as well as oocyte as potential targets for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The SARS-CoV-2 causes inflammation and hypoxia that generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) in critically ill patients. In addition, a large number of casualties and insecurity of life due to repeated waves of SARS-CoV-2 infection generate psychological stress and cortisol resulting in the further generation of ROS. The excess levels of ROS under physiological range cause meiotic instability, while high levels result in oxidative stress that trigger various death pathways and affect number as well as quality of follicular oocytes. Although, emerging evidence suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 utilises cellular machinery of ovarian follicular cells, generates ROS and impairs quality of follicular oocytes, the underlying mechanism of viral entry into host cell and its negative impact on the follicular oocyte remains poorly understood. Therefore, this review summarises emerging evidence on the presence of cellular machinery for SARS-CoV-2 in ovarian follicles and the potential negative impact of viral infection on the follicular oocytes that affect ovarian functions in critically ill and stressed women.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Female; Oocytes; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Reactive Oxygen Species; Virus Internalization; Cathepsin L; Basigin; Ovarian Follicle; Oxidative Stress; Serine Endopeptidases
PubMed: 38937111
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2568 -
Microvascular Research Jun 2024
PubMed: 38936768
DOI: 10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104709 -
Life Sciences Jun 2024Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a significant and escalating global health challenge, with morbidity and mortality rates rising steadily. Evidence increasingly... (Review)
Review
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a significant and escalating global health challenge, with morbidity and mortality rates rising steadily. Evidence increasingly implicates perirenal adipose tissue (PRAT) deposition as a contributing factor in the pathogenesis of CKD. This review explores how PRAT deposition may exert deleterious effects on renal structure and function. The anatomical proximity of PRAT to the kidneys not only potentially causes mechanical compression but also leads to the dysregulated secretion of adipokines and inflammatory mediators, such as adiponectin, leptin, visfatin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and exosomes. Additionally, PRAT deposition may contribute to renal lipotoxicity through elevated levels of free fatty acids (FFA), triglycerides (TAG), diacylglycerol (DAG), and ceramides (Cer). PRAT deposition is also linked to the hyperactivation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), which further exacerbates CKD progression. Recognizing PRAT deposition as an independent risk factor for CKD underscores the potential of targeting PRAT as a novel strategy for the prevention and management of CKD. This review further discusses interventions that could include measuring PRAT thickness to establish a baseline, managing metabolic risk factors that promote its deposition, and inhibiting key PRAT-induced signaling pathways.
PubMed: 38936605
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.122866