-
Annali Italiani Di Chirurgia 2024Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen in pediatric surgery. The purpose of this study was to observe the effects of integrated rapid...
AIM
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen in pediatric surgery. The purpose of this study was to observe the effects of integrated rapid rehabilitation nursing in children with laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) during the perioperative period.
METHODS
A total of 200 children with appendicitis who underwent LA in our hospital from January 2022 to January 2023 were retrospectively selected as the study subjects. According to the nursing mode, they were divided into a control group (n = 100) and an observation group (n = 100). The control group was treated with routine nursing intervention, and the observation group was treated with an integrated rapid rehabilitation nursing intervention. Perioperative indices (operation time, first postoperative exhaust time, length of hospital stay) were recorded and compared between the two groups. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to score the two groups at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery, and the pain degree of the children was quantitatively evaluated. The levels of serum stress response indices (cortisol (Cor), norepinephrine (NE), and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)) in the two groups were measured. The incidence of postoperative complications, improvement of postoperative quality of life, and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
The operation time, first postoperative exhaust time, and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (p < 0.05), and the VAS scores of the patients in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at each time point of 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery (p < 0.05). One hour after surgery, the serum Cor, NE, and ACTH levels of the two groups of patients were significantly higher than those before surgery, and the levels for the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.05). After treatment, the quality of life scores of patients in both groups was significantly higher than before treatment, and the quality of life scores of patients in the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (p < 0.05). The postoperative complication rate of the observation group was 3.00% (3/100), which was significantly lower than that of the control group (13.00% (13/100)) (χ2 = 6.793, p = 0.009). The nursing satisfaction of the observation group was 95.00% (95/100), which was significantly higher than that of the control group (79.00% (79/100)) (χ2 = 11.317, p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The integrated rapid rehabilitation nursing management mode is an intervention that can effectively alleviate the effects of LA on stress reactions and pain in children with appendicitis. It can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and improve the patient's nursing satisfaction, allowing children with appendicitis to recover as soon as possible after surgery, and can improve patients' quality of life. It helps to improve the overall clinical efficacy, and the treatment process is simple to operate, relatively safe and reliable, has high use value, and is worthy of further promotion in clinical treatment.
Topics: Humans; Appendicitis; Child; Appendectomy; Female; Laparoscopy; Male; Retrospective Studies; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Length of Stay; Perioperative Period; Child, Preschool; Operative Time
PubMed: 38918972
DOI: 10.62713/aic.3137 -
Surgery Jun 2024Robot-assisted surgery has seen exponential adoption over the last decade. Although the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery in the elective setting have been...
BACKGROUND
Robot-assisted surgery has seen exponential adoption over the last decade. Although the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery in the elective setting have been demonstrated, data regarding robotic emergency general surgery remains sparse.
METHODS
All adults undergoing non-elective appendectomy, cholecystectomy, small or large bowel resection, perforated ulcer repair, or lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2008 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Temporal trends were analyzed using a rank-based, non-parametric test developed by Cuzick (nptrend). Using laparoscopy as a reference, multivariable regressions were used to evaluate the association between robotic techniques and in-hospital mortality, major complications, and resource use for each emergency general surgery operation.
RESULTS
Of an estimated 4,040,555 patients undergoing emergency general surgery, 65,853 (1.6%) were performed using robotic techniques. The robotic proportion of minimally invasive emergency general surgery increased significantly overall, with the largest growth seen in robot-assisted large bowel resections and perforated ulcer repairs. After adjustment for various patient and hospital-level factors, robot-assisted large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.91) and cholecystectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.81) were associated with significantly reduced odds of perioperative blood transfusion compared to traditional laparoscopy. Although robotic techniques were associated with modest reductions in postoperative length of stay, costs were uniformly higher by increments of up to $4,900.
CONCLUSION
Robotic surgery appears to be a safe and effective adjunct to laparoscopy in minimally invasive emergency general surgery, although comparable cost-effectiveness has yet to be realized. Increasing use of robotic techniques in emergency general surgery may be attributable in part to reduced complications, including blood loss, in certain operative contexts.
PubMed: 38918109
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.002 -
Association of High BMI With Morbidity and Mortality in Common Emergency General Surgery Procedures.The Journal of Surgical Research Jun 2024Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are at increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. Obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes in this population....
INTRODUCTION
Emergency general surgery (EGS) patients are at increased risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. Obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes in this population. Our study aimed to explore the association of body mass index (BMI) with postoperative outcomes in patients requiring common EGS procedures.
METHODS
A retrospective review of the 2018-2020 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database identified patients undergoing four common EGS procedures: large bowel resection, small bowel resection, cholecystectomy, and appendectomy. Patients were classified by BMI: normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m), obesity classes I (30-34.9 kg/m), II (35-39.9 kg/m), III (40-49.9 kg/m), and IV (≥50 kg/m). Main outcomes of interest were major adverse event (MAE) and mortality.
RESULTS
From 2018 to 2020, a total of 82,540 patients underwent one of four common EGS procedures. On unadjusted analysis, obesity class IV had higher mortality rates compared to classes I-III (6.2% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001). Patients in obesity classes I-III had lower odds of MAE and death relative to those of normal weight. Compared to other patients with obesity, those in obesity class IV were at increased risk of MAE (odds ratio 1.27; 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.44) and death (odds ratio 1.69; 95% confidence interval 1.34-2.13).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with varying degrees of obesity have different risk profiles following common EGS procedures. While patients in lower obesity classes had reduced odds of adverse outcomes, those with BMI ≥50 kg/m were particularly at greater risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality. This vulnerable population warrants further investigation and increased vigilance to ensure high-quality care.
PubMed: 38917577
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.05.016 -
Surgical Case Reports Jun 2024Gastrointestinal mucormycosis is a rapidly progressing and often fatal disease, predominantly affecting immunocompromised patients. Surgical intervention, in addition to...
BACKGROUND
Gastrointestinal mucormycosis is a rapidly progressing and often fatal disease, predominantly affecting immunocompromised patients. Surgical intervention, in addition to antifungal therapy, is essential. Herein, we describe the successful management of appendiceal mucormycosis in a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia through rapid surgical intervention and antifungal therapy.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 29-year-old woman underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Subsequently, her condition relapsed, and remission induction therapy was initiated. During the immunosuppressive period, she developed a fever and severe abdominal pain. Computed tomography revealed severe edema of the ileum, cecum, and ascending colon. Despite receiving multiple antibiotics, antivirals, and antifungals, her condition showed no improvement. Consequently, she underwent exploratory laparotomy, with no bowel perforation noted, revealing severe inflammation in the ileum, cecum, and ascending colon, as well as appendiceal necrosis. Appendectomy was performed, and histopathological analysis revealed hyphae in the vessels and layers of the appendiceal wall, suggestive of mucormycosis. The patient was diagnosed with appendiceal mucormycosis, and liposomal amphotericin B was administered. Subsequent monitoring showed no recurrence of mucormycosis. Genetic analysis of the resected tissue revealed Rhizopus microspores as the causative agent.
CONCLUSIONS
Rapid surgical intervention and antifungal drug administration proved successful in managing appendiceal mucormycosis in a patient with APL. Early recognition and aggressive surgical intervention are imperative to improve outcomes in such patients.
PubMed: 38916715
DOI: 10.1186/s40792-024-01958-y -
Annals of Surgery Jun 2024Since introducing new and alternative treatment options may increase decisional conflict, we aimed to describe the use of the decision support tool (DST) and its impact...
OBJECTIVE
Since introducing new and alternative treatment options may increase decisional conflict, we aimed to describe the use of the decision support tool (DST) and its impact on treatment preference and decisional conflict.
SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA
For the treatment of appendicitis, antibiotics are an effective alternative to appendectomy, with both approaches associated with a different set of risks (e.g., recurrence vs surgical complications) and benefits (e.g., more rapid return to work vs decreased chance of readmission). Patients often have limited knowledge of these treatment options and decision support tools that include video-based educational materials and questions to elicit patient preferences about outcomes may be helpful. Concurrent to the Comparing Outcomes of Drugs and Appendectomy (CODA) trial, our group developed a DST for appendicitis treatment (www.appyornot.org).
METHODS
A retrospective cohort including people who self-reported current appendicitis and used the AppyOrNot DST between 2021-2023. Treatment preferences before- and after- use of the DST, demographic information, and Ottawa Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) were reported after completing the DST.
RESULTS
8,243 people from 66 countries and all 50 US states accessed the DST. Before the DST, 14% had a strong preference for antibiotics and 31% for appendectomy, with 55% undecided. After using the DST, the proportion in the undecided category decreased to 49% (P<0.0001). 52% of those who completed the Ottawa Decisional Conflict Score (DCS) (n=356) reported the lowest level of decisional conflict (<25) after using the DST; 43% had a DCS score of 25-50, 5.1% had a DCS score of >50 and 2.5% had and DCS score of >75.
CONCLUSION
The publicly available DST appyornot.org reduced the proportion that was undecided about which treatment they favored and had a modest influence on those with strong treatment preferences. Decisional conflict was not common after use. The use of this DST is now a component of a nationwide implementation program aimed at improving the way surgeons share information about appendicitis treatment options. If its use can be successfully implemented, this may be a model for improving communication about treatment for patients experiencing emergency health conditions.
PubMed: 38916104
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006412 -
Ochsner Journal 2024Stump appendicitis-a rare, delayed complication of appendectomy-is most commonly managed with surgical exploration and stump appendectomy. Conservative management in...
Stump appendicitis-a rare, delayed complication of appendectomy-is most commonly managed with surgical exploration and stump appendectomy. Conservative management in the pediatric population is poorly characterized in the literature. We report a case of a 10-year-old male who was diagnosed with stump appendicitis and initially treated nonoperatively. He received intravenous antibiotics and supportive therapy while in the hospital, was discharged on a course of oral antibiotics, and remained asymptomatic for the following 9 weeks until he underwent an elective interval stump appendectomy. We also review the literature on this uncommon condition and treatment plan. Considering stump appendicitis in the differential of children with history of appendectomy is imperative. Nonoperative management of stump appendicitis may be successful and beneficial in select pediatric cases compared to the standard surgical management.
PubMed: 38912182
DOI: 10.31486/toj.23.0098 -
Journal of Indian Association of... 2024Ladd's procedure, originally described in 1936 for the treatment of malrotation, does not traditionally include appendectomy as a standard step. We conducted a...
INTRODUCTION
Ladd's procedure, originally described in 1936 for the treatment of malrotation, does not traditionally include appendectomy as a standard step. We conducted a multinational survey to investigate the current consensus on the role of appendectomy in Ladd's procedure.
METHODOLOGY
An anonymous online survey was distributed to pediatric surgeons worldwide. The survey collected demographic data and explored surgical preferences related to the management of malrotation. Open-ended questions were used to assess the opinions regarding the necessity of appendectomy, decision-making factors, and complications associated with appendectomy during Ladd's procedure.
RESULTS
A total of 343 responses were received from 46 countries. Of the respondents, 319 (93%) were consultants and 24 (7%) were residents/trainees. When asked about the choice between open and laparoscopic Ladd's procedure, 292 (85%) preferred open surgery. Overall, 184 (53%) respondents favored appendectomy in both open and laparoscopic Ladd's procedure. Furthermore, 172 (50%) surgeons advocated for appendectomy in all malrotation cases, citing concerns about potential future appendicitis. While differences existed between all comparisons, none of them reached statistical significance. The factors influencing the decision to preserve the appendix included the risk of postoperative complications and the potential future use of the appendix as a surgical conduit. The surgical complications following appendectomy included surgical site infections in 14 (33%) patients, adhesive obstruction in 13 (31%) patients, intrabdominal abscesses in 10 (24%) patients, and fecal fistulas in 5 (12%) patients.
CONCLUSION
The majority of surgeons aim to perform appendectomy in all malrotation cases, considering the potential risks and benefits of this approach. These findings offer valuable insights for clinical practice and may inform future guidelines and decision-making algorithms.
PubMed: 38912021
DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_258_23 -
Cureus May 2024Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency marked by inflammation of the appendix, often due to blockage of the appendix lumen by fecoliths, lymphoid hyperplasia, or...
Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency marked by inflammation of the appendix, often due to blockage of the appendix lumen by fecoliths, lymphoid hyperplasia, or neoplasms. While various causes are known, appendicitis triggered by a foreign body (FB) is exceptionally rare. This case report highlights a rare presentation of appendicitis in a 32-year-old male with no significant medical history, who presented with acute lower right abdominal pain, fever, and vomiting. Initial evaluation suggested appendicitis, further supported by laboratory findings and diagnostic imaging revealing a retrocecal appendix with surrounding inflammation. Remarkably, an FB, a fish bone, was discovered lodged within the perforated appendix, elucidating the unusual etiology. Emergency laparotomy confirmed the diagnosis and facilitated prompt surgical intervention. This case underscores the importance of thorough evaluation and consideration of uncommon causes in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain, illustrating the critical role of detailed history-taking and clinical acumen in guiding management decisions and ensuring favorable patient outcomes.
PubMed: 38910666
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60910 -
Surgery Jun 2024The current scores used to help diagnose acute appendicitis have a "gray" zone in which the diagnosis is usually inconclusive. Furthermore, the universal use of CT...
BACKGROUND
The current scores used to help diagnose acute appendicitis have a "gray" zone in which the diagnosis is usually inconclusive. Furthermore, the universal use of CT scanning is limited because of the radiation hazards and/or limited resources. Hence, it is imperative to have an accurate diagnostic tool to avoid unnecessary, negative appendectomies.
METHODS
This was an international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study. The diagnostic accuracy of the artificial intelligence platform was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, the area under the receiver curve, precision curve, F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient. Moreover, calibration curve, decision curve analysis, and clinical impact curve analysis were used to assess the clinical utility of the artificial intelligence platform. The accuracy of the artificial intelligence platform was also compared to that of CT scanning.
RESULTS
Two data sets were used to assess the artificial intelligence platform: a multicenter real data set (n = 2,579) and a well-qualified synthetic data set (n = 9736). The platform showed a sensitivity of 92.2%, specificity of 97.2%, and negative predictive value of 98.7%. The artificial intelligence had good area under the receiver curve, precision, F1 score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (0.97, 86.7, 0.89, 0.88, respectively). Compared to CT scanning, the artificial intelligence platform had a better area under the receiver curve (0.92 vs 0.76), specificity (90.9 vs 53.3), precision (99.8 vs 98.9), and Matthews correlation coefficient (0.77 vs 0.72), comparable sensitivity (99.2 vs 100), and lower negative predictive value (67.6 vs 99.5). Decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve analysis intuitively revealed that the platform had a substantial net benefit within a realistic probability range from 6% to 96%.
CONCLUSION
The current artificial intelligence platform had excellent sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy exceeding 90% and may help clinicians in decision making on patients with suspected acute appendicitis, particularly when access to CT scanning is limited.
PubMed: 38910047
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.007 -
Lancet (London, England) Jun 2024
Topics: Humans; Appendicitis; Appendectomy; Time-to-Treatment; Preoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38908876
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00640-8