-
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology May 2024Bosentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of SSc digital ulcers (DU) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Systolic pulmonary...
OBJECTIVES
Bosentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of SSc digital ulcers (DU) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (sPAP) is a relevant parameter for the follow-up and prognosis of SSc-PAH. The therapeutic magnitude of bosentan in SSc-PAH is not fully understood, thus we aim to establish the degree of sPAP reduction in bosentan treated SSc-PAH patients.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature review in three databases from January 2000 to June 2023, involving sPAP measurement at transthoracic echocardiography of SSc patients before and after starting bosentan. Following the study quality assessment and data extraction, we performed random-effects meta-analysis and Egger's test for publication bias. Stratified analysis was performed for mono-/combination therapy, follow up duration (≤1 year), indication for bosentan therapy (PAH or DU/mixed).
RESULTS
In the 11 selected manuscripts, sPAP mean difference before and after bosentan therapy was - 5.63mmHg (CI95% -9.79 to -1.48, p=0.0078). In stratified analysis, sPAP mean was significantly different before and after bosentan therapy only for studies considering < 1 year of follow-up (p=0.0020), monotherapy (p=0.0140) and the strict indication for PAH (p=0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS
Bosentan significantly decreases sPAP, a relevant prognostic marker, especially in overt SSc-PAH. However, bosentan did not decrease sPAP when started for DU/mixed indication nor for follow-up>1 year. The burden of publication bias was significant. Therefore, further studies are required to assess bosentan's haemodynamic effect in high-risk patients for SSc-PAH.
PubMed: 38819960
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/xbdtb5 -
Pediatrics and Neonatology May 2024Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is characterized by sustained elevated Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP). Drug resistance and the adverse effects...
Study on the comparison between Bosentan and Macitentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborns, simultaneously on sildenafil: A randomized double-blinded non-inferiority parallel clinical trial.
BACKGROUND
Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is characterized by sustained elevated Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP). Drug resistance and the adverse effects of current therapeutic agents warrant investigation of other targeted therapies. Bosentan has shown benefits in affected neonates. However, trials reported the association with unwanted effects. Thus, in this study, we assess another agent in the same family, Macitentan. However, its efficacy in the treatment of PPHN is not yet reported. Hence, this study evaluated the effect of Macitentan compared to Bosentan in terms of efficacy and safety in the treatment of PPHN.
METHODS
This randomized, double-blinded non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted in Shahid Akbar Abadi hospital, Tehran, Iran. Sixty clinically stable neonates with signs suggestive of PPHN were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 30 in each group) and they received either Bosentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD (twice daily) or Macitentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD simultaneously with sildenafil. The echocardiographic and laboratory indices of efficacy and safety were compared between groups. SPAP (systolic pulmonary artery pressure) was used to assess the non-inferiority of the Macitentan compared to the Bosentan in their respective doses used in the study.
RESULTS
Participants' mean (SD) age was 3.53 (1.21) days, and 55% were female. No mortality case occurred. SPAP was reduced in both Bosentan and Macitenan groups with the mean difference in SPAP of 9 (95% CI: 7.34-10.65) in Bosentan and SPAP mean difference of 14 (95% CI: 12.12-15.86) in Macitentan group. Categorical comparison of primary outcome improvement showed that Macitentan was superior to Bosentan with a 10% non-inferiority margin. Similar results were obtained in other echocardiographic indices. Also, no significant alterations were observed in laboratory safety parameters.
CONCLUSION
Macitentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD (twice daily) is non-inferior to Bosentan 1 mg/kg/dose BD in improving echo outcomes of PPHN and it was even more effective in improving some of these. Also, it is non-inferior to Bosentan in terms of safety. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: (IRCT20160120026115N9).
PubMed: 38797632
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.12.007 -
ESC Heart Failure May 2024A recent guideline presented by the ESC Congress in 2022 had indicated a novel therapy targeted at pulmonary artery hypertension, known as pulmonary artery denervation...
AIMS
A recent guideline presented by the ESC Congress in 2022 had indicated a novel therapy targeted at pulmonary artery hypertension, known as pulmonary artery denervation (PADN), which get inspired from a laboratorial trial that could lowering the pulmonary artery pressure through the intervention on the animals. Our aim is to conduct a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PADN from six aspects with the current conventional therapies.
METHODS AND RESULTS
According to the PRISMA guidance, databases including Ovid, ClinicalTrials.gov, Medline, Embase, and PubMed were searched from inception to 22 August 2023, along with a full assessment of the previous five meta-analyses. Data were extracted and curated for Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the change in the 6-min walking distance (6MWD) from baseline with a secondary outcome called change in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) from baseline. The four safety outcomes included risk of clinical worsening, hospitalization, mortality and severe adverse events (SAEs). The comparison is structured on a contrast model based on 65 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PADN and the other conventional mainstream drugs. PADN had a better effect in improving 6MWD than Placebo (-77.76 m, 95% CI: -102.04 to -54.34 m), Macitentan (-65.32 m, 95% CI: -95.34 to -36.1 m), Bosentan (-64.5 m, 95% CI: -94.7 to -35.07 m), Iloprost (-62.66 m, 95% CI: -99.48 to -27.13 m), Oxygen (-62.42 m, 95% CI: -100.01 to -25.78 m), Treprostinil (-62.01 m, 95% CI: -89.04 to -35.61 m), Riociguat (-60.59 m, 95% CI: -86.11 to -35.98 m), Selexipag (-47.2 m, 95% CI: -85.61 to -10.19 m), Sildenafil (-44.92 m, 95% CI: -74.43 to -16.15 m), or Sitaxsentan (-39.53 m, 95% CI: -78.99 to -0.76 m). PADN had a better antihypertensive effect than placebo and showed statistical significant lower risks to induce clinical worsening and re-hospitalization than treprostinil, riociguat, and placebo groups. No statistically significant difference in risk of mortality and severe adverse events was observed between PADN versus the other interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with 16 types of conventional therapies and Placebo, PADN has advantage over nine single therapies and Placebo in improving 6MWD and appears to be better than two types of dual-drug combined therapies while with no statistical significance. PADN shows a favourable antihypertensive effect on mPAP and has a lower risk to trigger clinical worsening or hospitalization, while its risk on mortality and severe adverse events is still inconclusive.
PubMed: 38783684
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14842 -
Cell Death & Disease May 2024Recruitment of fibroblasts to tumors and their activation into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is a strategy used by tumor cells to direct extracellular matrix...
Recruitment of fibroblasts to tumors and their activation into cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) is a strategy used by tumor cells to direct extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, invasion, and metastasis, highlighting the need to investigate the molecular mechanisms driving CAF function. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) regulates the communication between cancer and stroma and facilitates the progression of serous ovarian cancer (SOC). By binding to Endothelin A (ET) and B (ET) receptors, ET-1 enables the recruitment of β-arrestin1 (β-arr1) and the formation of signaling complexes that coordinate tumor progression. However, how ET-1 receptors might "educate" human ovarian fibroblasts (HOFs) to produce altered ECM and promote metastasis remains to be elucidated. This study identifies ET-1 as a pivotal factor in the activation of CAFs capable of proteolytic ECM remodeling and the generation of heterotypic spheroids containing cancer cells with a propensity to metastasize. An autocrine/paracrine ET-1/ETR/β-arr1 loop enhances HOF proliferation, upregulates CAF marker expression, secretes pro-inflammatory cytokines, and increases collagen contractility, and cell motility. Furthermore, ET-1 facilitates ECM remodeling by promoting the lytic activity of invadosome and activation of integrin β1. In addition, ET-1 signaling supports the formation of heterotypic HOF/SOC spheroids with enhanced ability to migrate through the mesothelial monolayer, and invade, representing metastatic units. The blockade of ETR or β-arr1 silencing prevents CAF activation, invadosome function, mesothelial clearance, and the invasive ability of heterotypic spheroids. In vivo, therapeutic inhibition of ETR using bosentan (BOS) significantly reduces the metastatic potential of combined HOFs/SOC cells, associated with enhanced apoptotic effects on tumor cells and stromal components. These findings support a model in which ET-1/β-arr1 reinforces tumor/stroma interaction through CAF activation and fosters the survival and metastatic properties of SOC cells, which could be counteracted by ETR antagonists.
Topics: Humans; Female; Ovarian Neoplasms; beta-Arrestin 1; Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts; Cell Line, Tumor; Podosomes; Endothelin-1; Neoplasm Metastasis; Receptor, Endothelin A; Signal Transduction; Extracellular Matrix; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Animals; Fibroblasts; Neoplasm Invasiveness
PubMed: 38777849
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-06730-6 -
Scientific Reports May 2024Bosentan is a drug used to treat pulmonary hypertension via dual endothelial receptor antagonism. Bosentan has a restricted oral bioavailability, a problem that's mostly...
Bosentan is a drug used to treat pulmonary hypertension via dual endothelial receptor antagonism. Bosentan has a restricted oral bioavailability, a problem that's mostly due to poor solubility and hepatic metabolism. It is extensively used for the elderly and children who require a friendly dosage form like orodispersible tablets. So, the goal of this research work was to hasten the dissolution rate of bosentan to produce an orodispersible tablet with immediate drug release. Bosentan was exposed to ethanol-assisted kneading with a rise of xylitol or menthol concentrations (1:1 and 1:2 molar ratio of bosentan with excipient). In addition to observing the dissolution behavior, the resulting dry products were investigated using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential thermal analysis (DTA), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). The FTIR reflected possible hydrogen bonding with xylitol and menthol. DSC studies reflected a reduction in the enthalpy and Tm. These results with XRD data reflected partial co-amorphization in the case of xylitol and eutaxia in the case of menthol. These modifications were related to an accelerated dissolving rate. The developed systems were fabricated as orodispersible tablets which exhibited immediate release of bosentan. Thus, the current study offered simple co-processing for the preparation of orodispersible bosentan tablets.
Topics: Bosentan; Xylitol; Tablets; Menthol; Solubility; Administration, Oral; Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared; Drug Liberation; X-Ray Diffraction; Excipients; Humans; Drug Compounding; Calorimetry, Differential Scanning
PubMed: 38724608
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60494-9 -
Translational Pediatrics Apr 2024Pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and pulmonary arterial hypertension have been shown to have potential associations with the use of dasatinib in adults. However,...
BACKGROUND
Pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, and pulmonary arterial hypertension have been shown to have potential associations with the use of dasatinib in adults. However, due to the limited data regarding the efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in pediatric patients necessities reliance on clinical experience gained from treating adults.
CASE DESCRIPTION
We present a case of a 12-year-old female patient with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) who developed significant right-sided pleural effusion, moderate pericardial effusion, and pulmonary arterial hypertension during dasatinib therapy. Dasatinib was promptly discontinued upon identification of these adverse events. This was followed by the use of bosentan for pulmonary hypertension, furosemide and spironolactone diuretics, prednisone anti-inflammatory, and especially a bold attempt to improve pulmonary endothelial permeability with acetyl cysteine aerosolization. At the same time, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data reported by the patient and combined with the actual situation, the appropriate TKI was selected for the patient to continue the CML treatment.
CONCLUSIONS
FAERS data gathered on OpenVigil indicates that the signal associated with pericardial effusion is stronger among individuals under the age of 18 when imatinib is used instead of dasatinib (exactly the reverse of the results in the adult group). However, this does not imply that dasatinib is safer for the smaller group. In our situation, dasatinib-induced adverse effects include pericardial effusion. As a result, while administering TKIs to pediatric patients, we still need to increase monitoring-particularly for pulmonary and cardiovascular toxicity-and take swift action in the event that a major adverse reaction occurs. In addition, it is important to report these adverse effects as much as possible in order to give pediatric patients utilizing TKIs more helpful information.
PubMed: 38715671
DOI: 10.21037/tp-23-517 -
The Medical Letter on Drugs and... May 2024
Topics: Humans; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38696310
DOI: 10.58347/tml.2024.1702a -
Avicenna Journal of Medical... 2024In order to measure the plasma levels of Losartan and Bosentan, a sensitive Reverse Phase-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) technique was developed.
BACKGROUND
In order to measure the plasma levels of Losartan and Bosentan, a sensitive Reverse Phase-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) technique was developed.
METHODS
To compare bioavailability, the Area Under the Curve (AUC), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to Cmax (Tmax) were employed. The standard curve (150-2400 ) was linear (R=0.999), relative errors were between 2.4 to 10.05% and the coefficient of variation (CV%) ranged from 1.52 to 10.88. A single dosage (test and reference) was used for the investigation, which involved 16 healthy individuals.
RESULTS
The AUC0-48, AUC0-, Cmax, and Tmax of the test and reference had no statistically significant differences. The C and 95% confidence intervals of the ratio of C of the two formulations were 0.93-0.96 and 97.6-135%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Therefore, it was established that generic Bosentan was equivalent to Bosentan from Actelion and that both medications could be regarded as equally effective in clinical settings. The blood level of Bosentan could be measured using this straightforward procedure in all hospital laboratories.
PubMed: 38618512
DOI: 10.18502/ajmb.v16i2.14861 -
Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Mar 2024Off-label pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted drugs are commonly prescribed for non-operated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), but their...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Off-label pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted drugs are commonly prescribed for non-operated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), but their effect on the long-term prognosis of CTEPH remains unknown. This study investigated the effect of off-label PAH-targeted drugs on the long-term survival of CTEPH patients.
METHODS
CTEPH patients were enrolled from a prospective multicentre national registry. Except for licensed riociguat and treprostinil, other PAH-targeted drugs were off-label. In the original and propensity score-matched (PSM) samples, five-year survival was compared in two groups: (a) patients not receiving off-label PAH-targeted drugs (control) versus (b) patients receiving off-label PAH-targeted drugs (treatment). The latter group was investigated for the effect of started off-label PAH-targeted drugs at baselines (initial) or during follow-up (subsequent).
RESULTS
Of 347 enrolled patients, 212 were treated with off-label PAH-targeted drugs initially (n = 173) or subsequently (n = 39), and 135 were untreated. The 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year survival of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (97.1% vs. 89.4%, 92.3% vs. 82.1%, 83.2% vs. 75.1% and 71.1% vs. 55.3%, respectively, log-rank test, p = 0.005). Initial treatment was correlated with better 5-year survival after excluding patients with subsequent treatment to reduce the immortal-time bias (hazard ratio: 0.611; 95% CI: 0.397-0.940; p = 0.025). In PSM samples, patients given initial treatment showed significantly better 5-year survival than untreated patients (68.9% vs. 49.3%, log-rank test, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSION
Off-label targeted drugs contributed to improved long-term survival in CTEPH patients receiving pharmacotherapies.
PubMed: 38494833
DOI: 10.1111/resp.14700 -
Journal of Medical Economics 2024Bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan are endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), currently available in Australia for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Comparative adherence of macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan in Australian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective real-world database study.
AIM
Bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan are endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), currently available in Australia for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study assessed the comparative adherence of these ERAs for PAH in Australian patients.
METHODS
This retrospective, observational study used data for adults with PAH from the Services Australia 10% Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset (01/2006-10/2020). The primary outcome was treatment adherence (i.e. receiving ≥80% of ERA doses over 12 months). Secondary outcomes were time to treatment change (add-on or switch) and overall survival.
RESULTS
The study included 436 patients who took bosentan ( = 200), ambrisentan ( = 69), or macitentan ( = 167). Treatment adherence was significantly greater in patients who received macitentan (65.3%) versus ambrisentan (56.5%) and bosentan (58.0%), with odds ratios (ORs; 95% CI) of 0.51 (0.30-0.88; = 0.016) for bosentan versus macitentan and 0.48 (0.24-0.96; = 0.037) for ambrisentan versus macitentan. The median time to treatment change was 47.2 and 43.4 months for bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively (not calculated for macitentan because of insufficient duration of data).
LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Real-world data for Australian patients with PAH showed that treatment adherence for ERAs was suboptimal. Adherence was higher for macitentan compared with ambrisentan and bosentan.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Bosentan; Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; Retrospective Studies; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Australia; Endothelin Receptor Antagonists; Phenylpropionates; Pyridazines; Pyrimidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 38488130
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2328483