-
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Jan 2023The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an analgesic adjunct demonstrated to reduce intraoperative opioid consumption within a Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Nociception Control of Bilateral Single-Shot Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to No Block in Open Heart Surgery-A Post Hoc Analysis of the NESP Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an analgesic adjunct demonstrated to reduce intraoperative opioid consumption within a Nociception Level (NOL) index-directed anesthetic protocol. We aimed to examine the ESPB effect on the quality of intraoperative nociception control evaluated with the NOL index. This is a post hoc analysis of the NESP (Nociception Level Index-Directed Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Heart Surgery) randomized controlled trial. Eighty-five adult patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery were allocated to group 1 (Control, = 43) and group 2 (ESPB, = 42). Both groups received general anesthesia. Preoperatively, group 2 received bilateral single-shot ESPB (1.5 mg/kg/side 0.5% ropivacaine mixed with dexamethasone 8 mg/20 mL). Until cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was initiated, fentanyl administration was individualized using the NOL index. The NOL index was compared at five time points: pre-incision (T1), post-incision (T2), pre-sternotomy (T3), post-sternotomy (T4), and pre-CPB (T5). On a scale from 0 (no nociception) to 100 (extreme nociception), a NOL index > 25 was considered an inadequate response to noxious stimuli. The average NOL index across the five time points in group 2 to group 1 was 12.78 ± 0.8 vs. 24.18 ± 0.79 ( < 0.001). The NOL index was significantly lower in the ESPB-to-Control group at T2 (12.95 ± 1.49 vs. 35.97 ± 1.47), T3 (13.28 ± 1.49 vs. 24.44 ± 1.47), and T4 (15.52 ± 1.49 vs. 34.39 ± 1.47) ( < 0.001) but not at T1 and T5. Compared to controls, significantly fewer ESPB patients reached a NOL index > 25 at T2 (4.7% vs. 79%), T3 (0% vs. 37.2%), and T4 (7.1% vs. 79%) ( < 0.001). The addition of bilateral single-shot ESPB to general anesthesia during cardiac surgery improved the quality of intraoperative nociception control according to a NOL index-based evaluation.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, General; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Darbepoetin alfa; Nerve Block; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 36837467
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59020265 -
Scientific Reports Feb 2023This study aimed to confirm changes in biomarkers of erythropoiesis and iron metabolism and serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) during darbepoetin-α treatment...
This study aimed to confirm changes in biomarkers of erythropoiesis and iron metabolism and serum fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23) during darbepoetin-α treatment and then switching to the hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat. A total of 28 patients on hemodialysis who received weekly doses of darbepoetin-α were switched to roxadustat. Biomarkers for erythropoiesis and iron metabolism and intact and C-terminal FGF-23 were measured in blood samples collected before the HD session on days - 7 (darbepoetin-α injection), - 4, and - 2, and days 0 (switch to roxadustat treatment, three times weekly), 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Erythropoietin and erythroferrone levels were elevated on day - 4 by darbepoetin-α injection and decreased to baseline levels at day 0. Levels of erythropoietin were not significantly increased by roxadustat supplementation, but erythroferrone levels were continuously elevated, similar to darbepoetin-α treatment. Hepcidin-25 and total iron binding capacity were significantly decreased or increased in patients treated with roxadustat compared with darbepoetin-α. Changes of intact and C-terminal FGF-23 levels were parallel to changes of phosphate levels during roxadustat treatment. However, the actual and percentage changes of intact FGF-23 and C-terminal FGF-23 in patients with low ferritin levels were greater than those in patients with high ferritin levels. Roxadustat might stimulate erythropoiesis by increasing iron usage through hepcidin-25, which was suppressed by erythroferrone in the physiological erythropoietin condition. Changes of intact FGF-23 and C-terminal FGF-23 levels might be affected by roxadustat in patients on hemodialysis, especially those with a low-iron condition.
Topics: Humans; Anemia; Biomarkers; Darbepoetin alfa; Dietary Supplements; Erythropoiesis; Erythropoietin; Ferritins; Glycine; Hepcidins; Iron; Isoquinolines; Renal Dialysis
PubMed: 36823243
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30331-6 -
Cureus Jan 2023Introduction Biologic drugs are used to treat various illnesses like autoimmune diseases, cancers, hormonal irregularities, anemia, etc., and to prevent various diseases...
Introduction Biologic drugs are used to treat various illnesses like autoimmune diseases, cancers, hormonal irregularities, anemia, etc., and to prevent various diseases as vaccines. Though various biologic drugs are already available, they are still not within reach of the common man due to financial constraints. Through many search engines, studies evaluating the cost variation of different brands of biologics were investigated; however, only a few studies that address this problem were found. Hence, this study was planned with the objective of addressing the cost variation of various brands of biologic medicines available in the Indian market. Methods The website for the Current Index of Medical Specialties (CIMS) for India's location was used to obtain the prices of the different brands of biologic medicines in Indian National Rupee (INR) currency, which different manufacturers market with identical forms in strength and dosage. The percentage cost variation and cost ratio were calculated with the help of the minimum and maximum prices of various brands of biologic drugs. Results The prices of biologics belonging to six different classes that are available in 23 formulations were analyzed. The highest cost variability was shown by pegfilgrastim 6 mg at 1,022.92%, and the minimum-cost variation was shown by darbepoetin alfa 200 mcg at 13.07%. Conclusion Our research found a vast variance in the costs of various brands of biologic medicines in India. The government should address this cost variation problem by developing various policies, such as breaking the monopoly of manufacturers, providing tax incentives to nonprofit generic medicine manufacturers, and incorporating more biologic drugs under the protection of the Drugs Prices Control Order (DPCO).
PubMed: 36820122
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33943 -
Turkish Journal of Haematology :... May 2023This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in a real-life...
OBJECTIVE
This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) in a real-life setting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 204 patients with low-risk or intermediate-1-risk MDS who received epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa were included. Hemoglobin levels and transfusion needs were recorded before treatment and at 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and 48 months of treatment.
RESULTS
At the 36-month (p=0.025) and 48-month (p=0.022) visits, epoetin alfa yielded significantly higher hemoglobin levels compared to darbepoetin alfa. Transfusion needs were also significantly lower with epoetin alfa compared to darbepoetin alfa at 24 months (p=0.012) and in the low-risk group compared to the intermediate-risk group at 24 months (p=0.018), 36 months (p=0.025), and 48 months (p<0.001). Treatment response rates at the 24-month, 36-month, and 48-month visits in the epoetin alfa (43.0%, 33.6%, and 27.1%), darbepoetin alfa (29.9%, 22.7%, and 16.5%), low-risk (39.3%, 30.0%, and 26.0%), and intermediate-risk (29.6%, 24.1%, and 11.1%) groups were lower than those obtained at 12 months, and the values differed significantly for the 36-month and 48-month visits with values ranging from p<0.05 to p<0.001.
CONCLUSION
This real-life long-term ESA extension study investigated the clinical efficacy of epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa for up to 48 months, revealing that treatment efficacy reached a plateau starting from the 24 month of therapy with a continuing decrease in treatment response rates regardless of treatment type, risk status, or gender. Nonetheless, significantly higher hemoglobin levels and marked improvement in transfusion needs were evident in epoetin-treated patients compared to darbepoetin-treated patients and in the low-risk group compared to the intermediate-risk group.
Topics: Humans; Anemia; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoiesis; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Recombinant Proteins
PubMed: 36799095
DOI: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2023.2022.0437 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2023Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat anaemia in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, their use has been associated with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat anaemia in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, their use has been associated with cardiovascular events. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2014.
OBJECTIVES
To compare the efficacy and safety of ESAs (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, and biosimilar ESAs against each other, placebo, or no treatment) to treat anaemia in adults with CKD.
SEARCH METHODS
In this update, we searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 29 April 2022 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included a comparison of an ESA (epoetin alfa, epoetin beta, darbepoetin alfa, methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta, a biosimilar epoetin or a biosimilar darbepoetin alfa) with another ESA, placebo or no treatment in adults with CKD were considered for inclusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two independent authors screened the search results and extracted data. Data synthesis was performed using random-effects pairwise meta-analysis (expressed as odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI)) and network meta-analysis. We assessed for heterogeneity and inconsistency within meta-analyses using standard techniques and planned subgroup and meta-regression to explore sources of heterogeneity or inconsistency. We assessed certainty in treatment estimates for the primary outcomes (preventing blood transfusions and death (any cause)) using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.
MAIN RESULTS
Sixty-two new studies (9237 participants) were included in this update, so the review now includes 117 studies with 25,237 participants. Most studies were at high or unclear risk of bias in most methodological domains. Overall, results remain similar in this update compared to our previous review in 2014. For preventing blood transfusion, epoetin alfa (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.61; low certainty evidence) and epoetin beta (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.47; low certainty evidence) may be superior to placebo, and darbepoetin alfa was probably superior to placebo (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.67; moderate certainty evidence). Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.02; very low certainty evidence), a biosimilar epoetin (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.03; very low certainty evidence) and a biosimilar darbepoetin alfa (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.91; very low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on preventing blood transfusion compared to placebo. The comparative effects of ESAs compared with another ESA on preventing blood transfusions were uncertain, in low to very low certainty evidence. Effects on death (any cause) were uncertain for epoetin alfa (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.22; low certainty evidence), epoetin beta (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.20; low certainty evidence), methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.71; very low certainty evidence), a biosimilar epoetin (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.36; low certainty evidence) and a biosimilar darbepoetin alfa (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.51 to 5.23; very low certainty evidence) compared to placebo. There was probably no difference between darbepoetin alfa and placebo on the odds of death (any cause) (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; moderate certainty evidence). The comparative effects of ESAs compared with another ESA on death (any cause) were uncertain in low to very low certainty evidence. Epoetin beta probably increased the odds of hypertension when compared to placebo (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.00; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, epoetin alfa (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.59; very low certainty evidence), darbepoetin alfa (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.14; low certainty evidence) and methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.74; low certainty evidence) may increase the odds of hypertension, but a biosimilar epoetin (OR 1.88, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.67; low certainty evidence) and biosimilar darbepoetin alfa (OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 4.66; low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on hypertension. The comparative effects of all ESAs compared with another ESA, placebo or no treatment on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular access thrombosis, kidney failure, and breathlessness were uncertain. Network analysis for fatigue was not possible due to sparse data. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The comparative effects of different ESAs on blood transfusions, death (any cause and cardiovascular), major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular access thrombosis, kidney failure, fatigue and breathlessness were uncertain.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Hematinics; Epoetin Alfa; Darbepoetin alfa; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Network Meta-Analysis; Erythropoiesis; Anemia; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Hypertension; Thrombosis; Dyspnea; Myocardial Infarction
PubMed: 36791280
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010590.pub3 -
The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology... 2023This study is to evaluate the effects of darbepoetin alfa (darbe) on neutrophil count in preterm neonates treated for anemia of prematurity.
OBJECTIVE
This study is to evaluate the effects of darbepoetin alfa (darbe) on neutrophil count in preterm neonates treated for anemia of prematurity.
METHODS
This was a retrospective chart review comparing the absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) of neonates administered 2 doses of subcutaneous darbe 10 mcg/kg to that of a randomly selected comparator group of neonates not administered the drug. Neonates <34 weeks gestational age, gestational age between 23w1d and 33w4d, born between July 2016 and June 2019, were included in the study.
RESULTS
The ANCs of 45 darbe-treated neonates compared with those of 45 randomly selected comparator control neonates revealed no difference in the rate of occurrence of neutropenia (ANC ≤1000/μL) between the darbe-treated neonates (26.7%) and comparator neonates (24.4%) (p > 0.99). There was also no difference in the rate of occurrence of severe neutropenia (ANC ≤500/μL) between the darbe-treated neonates (11.1%) and comparator neonates (6.7%) (p = 0.70). Darbepoetin alfa did not lead to differences in rates of resolution of neutropenia or severe neutropenia.
CONCLUSIONS
Short-term administration of darbe did not affect the ANCs of preterm neonates treated for anemia of prematurity. There was no difference in the rates of occurrence of neutropenia, severe neutropenia, or resolution of either between the darbe-treated neonates and comparator neonates.
PubMed: 36777988
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-28.1.41 -
MBio Feb 2023Streptococcus pneumoniae colonizes the human nasopharynx and causes several diseases. Pneumococcal vaccines target the polysaccharide capsule and prevent most serious...
Streptococcus pneumoniae colonizes the human nasopharynx and causes several diseases. Pneumococcal vaccines target the polysaccharide capsule and prevent most serious disease, but there has been an increase in the prevalence of nonencapsulated S. pneumoniae (NESp). Previously, it was thought that a capsule was necessary to cause invasive disease. NESp strains expressing the oligopeptide transporters AliC and AliD have been isolated from patients with invasive disease. The AliC and AliD oligopeptide transporters regulate the expression of several genes, including choline binding protein AC (CbpAC) (a homolog of PspA), which aids in reducing C3b deposition. It is hypothesized that by altering CbpAC expression, AliC and AliD provide protection from classical complement-mediated clearance by reducing C-reactive protein (CRP) binding. Our study demonstrates that AliC and AliD regulate CbpAC expression in NESp and that AliD found in certain serotypes of encapsulated strains regulates PspA expression. C3b deposition was increased in the NESp Δ and encapsulated mutants in comparison to the wild type. NESp strains expressing AliC and AliD have a significant decrease in C1q and CRP deposition in comparison to the Δ Δ mutant. The complement protein C1q is required for NESp clearance in a murine model and increases opsonophagocytosis. By regulating CbpAC expression, NESp inhibits CRP binding to the bacterial surface and blocks classical complement activation, leading to greater systemic survival and virulence. Due to the increase in the prevalence of NESp, it is important to gain a better understanding of NESp virulence mechanisms that aid in establishing disease and persistence within a host by avoiding clearance by the immune system. Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) can cause a range of diseases. Although there is a robust pneumococcal vaccination program that reduces invasive pneumococcal disease by targeting various polysaccharide capsules, there has been an increase in the isolation of nonvaccine serotypes and nonencapsulated S. pneumoniae (NESp) strains. While most studies of pneumococcal pathogenesis have focused on encapsulated strains, there is little understanding of how NESp causes disease. NESp lacks a protective capsule but contains novel genes, such as and , which have been shown to regulate the expression of numerous genes and to be required for NESp virulence and immune evasion. Furthermore, NESp strains have high transformation efficiencies and harbor resistance to multiple drugs. This could be deleterious to current treatment strategies employed for pneumococcal disease as NESp can be a reservoir of drug resistance genes. Therefore, deciphering how NESp survives within a host and facilitates disease is a necessity that will allow the fabrication of improved, broad-spectrum treatments and preventatives against pneumococcal disease. Our study provides a better understanding of NESp virulence mechanisms during host-pathogen interactions through the examination of genes directly regulated by the NESp proteins AliC and AliD.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Mice; Bacterial Proteins; Carrier Proteins; Choline; Complement C1q; Darbepoetin alfa; Membrane Transport Proteins; Pneumococcal Infections; Streptococcus pneumoniae
PubMed: 36625598
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.03325-22 -
American Journal of Kidney Diseases :... Jun 2023The optimum starting dose of intravenous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) has been previously determined; this study ascertains the optimum...
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE
The optimum starting dose of intravenous continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) has been previously determined; this study ascertains the optimum starting dose of subcutaneous C.E.R.A. administration in pediatric patients.
STUDY DESIGN
Phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS
Patients aged 3 months to 17 years with renal anemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD; including those treated with maintenance dialysis and those not treated with dialysis) who were receiving maintenance treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).
INTERVENTION
Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. administration every 4 weeks (starting dose was based on defined conversion factors).
OUTCOME
The primary outcome was the change in hemoglobin concentration between the baseline and evaluation period for each patient. Secondary efficacy measures and safety were also evaluated.
RESULTS
Forty patients aged 0.4-17.7 years were enrolled. The study achieved its primary outcome: the mean change in hemoglobin concentration was an increase of 0.48g/dL; the 95% confidence interval (0.15-0.82) and standard deviation (±1.03) were within the prespecified boundaries (-1 to 1g/dL and<1.5g/dL, respectively). Mean hemoglobin concentrations were maintained within the target 10-12g/dL range in 24 of 38 patients and within±1g/dL of the baseline in 19 of 38 patients, and the median C.E.R.A. subcutaneous dose decreased over time. Efficacy in key subgroups (age group, dialysis type, prior ESA treatment) was consistent with the primary outcome. Thirty-eight patients completed the core period; 25 chose to enter the safety extension period. Safety was consistent with prior studies, with no new signals.
LIMITATIONS
Single-arm and open-label study; small sample size.
CONCLUSIONS
Pediatric patients with anemia secondary to CKD who were on, or not on, dialysis could be safely and effectively switched from maintenance ESAs to subcutaneous C.E.R.A. administered every 4 weeks, using defined dose-conversion factors to determine the optimum starting dose.
FUNDING
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The SKIPPER trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03552393.
PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY
Anemia, a complication of chronic kidney disease, is associated with poor quality of life and an increased risk of hospitalization and mortality. The current treatments for anemia include iron therapy and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs); however, the relatively short half-lives of the ESAs epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin alfa may require more frequent dosing and hospital visits compared with the ESA known as continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.). A previous study demonstrated that children aged 5 years or more with anemia associated with chronic kidney disease who were on hemodialysis could be switched to intravenous C.E.R.A. from their existing epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin alfa treatment. This study provides evidence that subcutaneous C.E.R.A. can safely and effectively treat anemia in children, including those aged<5 years and regardless of whether they were on dialysis or the type of dialysis they received (peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis).
Topics: Humans; Child; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Quality of Life; Erythropoietin; Anemia; Hematinics; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Renal Dialysis; Hemoglobins
PubMed: 36587890
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.11.006 -
Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation :... Jul 2023The prespecified on-treatment analysis of ASCEND-ND (NCT02876835) raised concerns about a higher relative risk of cancer-related adverse events (AEs) with daprodustat vs...
Analysis of on-treatment cancer safety events with daprodustat versus conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents-post hoc analyses of the ASCEND-ND and ASCEND-D trials.
BACKGROUND
The prespecified on-treatment analysis of ASCEND-ND (NCT02876835) raised concerns about a higher relative risk of cancer-related adverse events (AEs) with daprodustat vs darbepoetin in patients with anaemia of CKD. This concern was not observed in dialysis patients in ASCEND-D (NCT02879305).
METHODS
ASCEND-ND randomized 3872 patients to daprodustat or darbepoetin. ASCEND-D randomized 2964 patients to daprodustat or conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). In both studies ESA comparators used different dosing intervals (3/week, 1/week, every 2 or every 4 weeks). The prespecified on-treatment approach examined relative risks for cancer AEs up to the last dose date + 1 day. In these analyses, owing to different dosing intervals between arms, Cox models were used to estimate the daprodustat effect by various follow-up periods (censoring at last dose date, last dose date + dosing intervals, or end of study).
RESULTS
In ASCEND-ND, the safety of daprodustat vs darbepoetin on cancer-related AEs depended on the duration of follow-up after last dose date: hazard ratio (HR) 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77, 1.40] at end of study [HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.81, 1.56) for last dose date + dosing interval; HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.04, 2.15) for last dose date + 1 day]. In ASCEND-D, no excess risk of cancer-related AEs was observed with any model examined.
CONCLUSIONS
Prespecified on-treatment analyses for cancer-related AEs appeared to result in biased risk estimates in ASCEND-ND by preferentially under-counting events from patients assigned to darbepoetin. Analyses accounting for longer darbepoetin dosing intervals, or extending follow-up, resulted in attenuation of effect estimates towards neutrality, similar to ASCEND-D, where ESA comparator dosing intervals are closer to daprodustat.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
The ASCEND-ND trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02876835); the ASCEND-D trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02879305).
Topics: Humans; Hematinics; Erythropoietin; Erythropoiesis; Renal Dialysis; Darbepoetin alfa; Neoplasms; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Hemoglobins
PubMed: 36565721
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac342 -
Current Pediatric Reviews 2023We previously reported improved neurodevelopment at 2 and 4 years among preterm infants treated with erythropoietin or darbepoetin, known as erythropoiesis-stimulating... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
We previously reported improved neurodevelopment at 2 and 4 years among preterm infants treated with erythropoietin or darbepoetin, known as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). We now characterize longitudinal outcomes through 6 years.
METHODS
Children randomized to ESAs or placebo were evaluated at 6 years. Healthy-term children served as controls. Tests of cognition and executive function (EF) were performed.
RESULTS
Cognitive/EF scores remained similar between 4 and 6 years within each group (ESA: 43 children; placebo: 17 children; term: 21 children). ESA recipients scored higher than placebo on Full-Scale IQ (94.2 ± 18.6 vs. 81.6 ± 16.7, p = 0.022), and Performance IQ (97.3 ± 16.2 vs. 81.7 ± 15.2, = 0.005). Aggregate EF trended better for the ESA group. Term controls scored better than placebo on all measures. ESA and term controls scored similarly on cognitive and EF tests.
CONCLUSION
ESA recipients had better outcomes than placebo recipients, and were similar to term children. ESAs may improve long-term cognition and executive function in preterm infants.
Topics: Infant; Child; Infant, Newborn; Humans; Hematinics; Infant, Premature; Darbepoetin alfa; Cognition; Erythropoiesis
PubMed: 36537596
DOI: 10.2174/1573396319666221219114704