-
Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Dec 2022Blistering autoimmune dermatoses are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases. Pemphigus diseases are distinguished from pemphigoid diseases as well as dermatitis... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Blistering autoimmune dermatoses are a heterogeneous group of rare diseases. Pemphigus diseases are distinguished from pemphigoid diseases as well as dermatitis herpetiformis. In pemphigus diseases, cutaneous blistering is caused by an intraepidermal loss of adhesion between keratinocytes. In pemphigoid diseases, blister formation is due to a subepidermal loss of adhesion of keratinocytes from the basement membrane.
OBJECTIVES
This article reviews the most important trigger factors associated with bullous autoimmune dermatoses and discusses their role in their initial manifestation as well as exacerbation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A focused review of the literature including original articles, guidelines, reference works and previously published review articles was performed.
RESULTS
Vaccinations, viral infections, ultraviolet light (UV) exposure and radiation therapies are possible triggers of pemphigus vulgaris in predisposed patients. For the much rarer pemphigus foliaceus, UV exposure is of particular importance. Thiols and phenols are drugs that can induce pemphigus usually resembling pemphigus foliaceus clinically. Age is the most important risk factor of bullous pemphigoid. In addition, in bullous pemphigoid associations with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, programmed cell death protein‑1 or programmed death-ligand‑1 inhibitors as well as neurological diseases are particularly relevant. Severe mucosal damage, certain drugs and in particular cases neoplasms might play a role in mucous membrane pemphigoid.
CONCLUSION
Knowing possible trigger factors facilitates a timely diagnosis upon initial manifestation and supports the prevention of relapse of bullous autoimmune dermatoses.
Topics: Humans; Pemphigus; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Autoimmune Diseases; Blister
PubMed: 37943295
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-023-05249-9 -
Italian Journal of Dermatology and... Oct 2023The oral mucosa can be involved in a wide variety of mucocutaneous conditions that may present primarily in the mouth or affect other cutaneous or mucosal sites. Many of... (Review)
Review
The oral mucosa can be involved in a wide variety of mucocutaneous conditions that may present primarily in the mouth or affect other cutaneous or mucosal sites. Many of these conditions are immune mediated and typically present as inflammatory mucosal pathology. Patients experiencing such conditions usually seek medical evaluation and treatment due to the associated pain and discomfort and occasionally taste disturbance or dysphagia and the overall deterioration in the oral health-related quality of life. These conditions share some common features and there could be some overlapping in their clinical presentation, which can lead to delays in diagnosis and proper management of patients. Clinicians dealing with such disorders, including dermatologists, need to be aware of the oral manifestations of mucocutaneous conditions, their clinical features, underlying mechanisms, diagnostic approaches, and treatment options, as well as the recent advances in the research on these conditions. This review provides a comprehensive, evidence-based reference for clinicians, with updated insights into a group of immune mediated conditions known to cause oral mucosal pathology. Part one will cover oral lichen planus, erythema multiforme and systemic lupus erythematosus, while part two will cover pemphigus vulgaris and mucous membrane pemphigoid, recurrent aphthous stomatitis, in addition to the less common disorders linear IgA disease, dermatitis herpetiformis and epidermolysis bullosa.
Topics: Humans; Mouth Mucosa; Mouth Diseases; Quality of Life; Stomatitis, Aphthous; Pemphigus
PubMed: 37916401
DOI: 10.23736/S2784-8671.23.07676-4 -
Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) Dec 2022Wheat sensitivity is a collective term for several, especially gastrointestinal, diseases that occur as part of a hypersensitivity reaction after wheat consumption.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Wheat sensitivity is a collective term for several, especially gastrointestinal, diseases that occur as part of a hypersensitivity reaction after wheat consumption. The symptoms, which are mostly similar to those of irritable bowel syndrome, are often accompanied by skin lesions. In addition to celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis, the cutaneous manifestation of celiac disease, wheat sensitivity also includes nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS), allergic nickel contact mucositis, wheat allergy, amylase-trypsin inhibitor intolerance, and fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) intolerance.
OBJECTIVES
This review article aims to provide an overview of the clinical, especially dermatological and gastrointestinal features of the different forms of wheat sensitivity. Diagnosis and therapeutic management are also discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A selective literature search was carried out with evaluation of our own clinical data.
RESULTS
The skin lesions in dermatitis herpetiformis are very disease-specific. In contrast, wheat allergy often shares signs and symptoms with many other diseases. Other forms of wheat sensitivity cause primarily gastrointestinal abnormalities, but extra-intestinal manifestations can also occur. Their diagnosis is often complex and requires cross-disciplinary collaboration with experts in gastroenterology. The therapy consists of a wheat- or gluten-free diet.
CONCLUSIONS
Knowledge of the different and frequently occurring dermatological signs of wheat sensitivity is of great importance, because dermatological manifestations associated with gastrointestinal pathology, intolerance reactions, and allergies appear more and more frequently.
Topics: Humans; Celiac Disease; Glutens; Wheat Hypersensitivity; Dermatitis Herpetiformis; Diet, Gluten-Free; Amylases
PubMed: 37882829
DOI: 10.1007/s00105-023-05243-1 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are a group of rare cutaneous disorders affecting cornified skin and mucous membranes. They are characterized by tense or flaccid...
INTRODUCTION
Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are a group of rare cutaneous disorders affecting cornified skin and mucous membranes. They are characterized by tense or flaccid blistering and erosions due to autoantibodies against desmosomal and hemidesmosomal structural proteins of the skin. This group of disorders can be divided into those of pemphigoid and those of pemphigus diseases. If left untreated, these autoimmune diseases can cause serious or even life-threatening complications such as loss of fluid, superinfections or impaired food intake. Due to modern standardized serological assays, the diagnosis of AIBDs can usually be confirmed in combination with their clinical appearance. Whereas for a long time corticosteroids were the major players in the treatment of these diseases, with the approval of rituximab and other immunosuppressive agents, the therapy has increasingly improved.
METHODS
In this study, we aimed to investigate epidemiologic and clinical features as well as diagnostics and therapy of bullous autoimmune diseases in Middle Franconia, a governorate within the German federal state of Bavaria. Patients diagnosed or treated because of a AIBDs between 01.04.2013 and 31.03.2019 at the dermatological department of the university hospital Erlangen were included in this retrospective study (n = 242). Patients were either diagnosed for the first time (n=176) or the diagnosis has been confirmed (n=66) at the department. The respective incidence was calculated among the 176 subjects who had been diagnosed at the center in this period. Data was taken from patient records and analyzed with Microsoft® Excel. The evaluation included the diagnoses of pemphigus vulgaris (PV), pemphigus foliaceus (PF), bullous pemphigoid (BP), mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), linear IgA dermatosis (LAD), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), and dermatitis herpetiformis (DH).
RESULTS
This study shows that the incidence of each AIBDs in Middle Franconia is low and comparable (PV, PF, LAD, EBA) or lower (BP, MMP, DH) than in other studies and regions. BP is the most common newly diagnosed AIBD in Middle Franconia.
DISCUSSION
Due to the chronic and sometimes severe course of AIBDs, repeated in-house treatments are often necessary. To date, mainly topically and systemically applied corticosteroids in combination with immunomodulators are used as first-line therapy.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Autoimmune Diseases; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Pemphigus; Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis; Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita; Adrenal Cortex Hormones
PubMed: 37881435
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1256617 -
International Journal of Dermatology Jan 2024
Topics: Humans; Dermatitis Herpetiformis; Pruritus; Azetidines; Sulfonamides
PubMed: 37818765
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.16878 -
Nature Communications Oct 2023Transglutaminase 3 (TG3), the autoantigen of dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), is a calcium dependent enzyme that targets glutamine residues in polypeptides for either...
Transglutaminase 3 (TG3), the autoantigen of dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), is a calcium dependent enzyme that targets glutamine residues in polypeptides for either transamidation or deamidation modifications. To become catalytically active TG3 requires proteolytic cleavage between the core domain and two C-terminal β-barrels (C1C2). Here, we report four X-ray crystal structures representing inactive and active conformations of human TG3 in complex with a TG3-specific Fab fragment of a DH patient derived antibody. We demonstrate that cleaved TG3, upon binding of a substrate-mimicking inhibitor, undergoes a large conformational change as a β-sheet in the catalytic core domain moves and C1C2 detaches. The unique enzyme-substrate conformation of TG3 without C1C2 is recognized by DH autoantibodies. The findings support a model where B-cell receptors of TG3-specific B cells bind and internalize TG3-gluten enzyme-substrate complexes thereby facilitating gluten-antigen presentation, T-cell help and autoantibody production.
Topics: Humans; Celiac Disease; Autoantibodies; Dermatitis Herpetiformis; Transglutaminases; Immunoglobulin A; Glutens
PubMed: 37798283
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-42004-z -
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology Dec 2023Dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) is a rare gluten-induced skin disorder characterized predominantly by IgA autoantibodies against endomysium, tissue transglutaminase...
BACKGROUND
Dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) is a rare gluten-induced skin disorder characterized predominantly by IgA autoantibodies against endomysium, tissue transglutaminase (TG2/tTG), epidermal transglutaminase (TG3/eTG) and deamidated gliadin. To date, circulating autoantibody reactivity has not been systematically described.
OBJECTIVES
Characterization of serum reactivities in DH.
METHODS
This multicentre international study analysed sera from 242 patients with DH taken at the time of initial diagnosis. DH-specific IgA and IgG serum autoantibodies were analysed by indirect immunofluorescence (IF) on monkey oesophagus, and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) based on recombinant TG2/tTG, TG3/eTG and deamidated gliadin (GAF3X).
RESULTS
IgA indirect IF microscopy on monkey oesophagus revealed the highest reactivity (84.3%; specificity 100%) followed by IgA TG2/tTG ELISA (78.5%, specificity 99.0%), IgA TG3/eTG ELISA (72.7%, specificity 95.0%) and IgA GAF3X ELISA (69.0%, specificity 98.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
Serum IgA and IgG autoantibodies against endomysium, TG2/tTG, TG3/eTG and deamidated gliadin are highly prevalent in DH. Indirect IF microscopy on monkey oesophagus (IgA) provides the highest diagnostic accuracy that can be further enhanced by 4.5% when combined with IgA TG2/tTG ELISA.
Topics: Humans; Animals; Dermatitis Herpetiformis; Gliadin; Immunoglobulin A; Autoantibodies; Transglutaminases; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Immunoglobulin G; Haplorhini
PubMed: 37793183
DOI: 10.1093/ced/llad319 -
Cureus Sep 2023Gluten sensitivity is defined as a chronic intolerance to gluten ingestion in genetically predisposed individuals. The etiology is thought to be immune-mediated and has... (Review)
Review
Gluten sensitivity is defined as a chronic intolerance to gluten ingestion in genetically predisposed individuals. The etiology is thought to be immune-mediated and has a variable dermatologic presentation. Celiac disease (CD) is one of the most common forms of gluten intolerance and encompasses a wide range of extra-intestinal pathology, including cutaneous, endocrine, nervous, and hematologic systems. Psoriasis, another long-term inflammatory skin condition, has been linked to significant symptomatic improvement with a gluten-free diet (GFD). Palmoplantar pustulosis (PP), a variant of psoriasis, and aphthous stomatitis, which causes recurrent oral ulcers, have also exhibited beneficial results after the dietary elimination of gluten. In addition to this, dermatitis herpetiformis (DH), another immune-mediated skin disorder, is genetically similar to CD and has, therefore, shown tremendous improvement with a GFD. Another highly prevalent long-term skin condition called atopic dermatitis (AD), however, has revealed inconsistent results with gluten elimination and would require further research in the future to yield concrete results. Hereditary angioedema (HA) has shown an association with gluten intolerance in some patients who had symptomatic benefits with a GFD. Similarly, vitiligo and linear IgA bullous dermatosis have also shown some clinical evidence of reversal with a GFD. On the contrary, rosacea enhances the risk of developing CD. This narrative review emphasizes the potential impact of gluten intolerance on different cutaneous conditions and the potential therapeutic effect of a GFD on various symptomatic manifestations. There is a need for additional clinical and observational trials to further expand on the underlying pathophysiology and provide conclusive and comprehensive recommendations for possible dietary interventions.
PubMed: 37790051
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44549 -
Cureus Aug 2023This study presents the case of a 23-year-old woman diagnosed with celiac disease (CD), a condition triggered by an immune response to gluten, leading to inflammation in...
This study presents the case of a 23-year-old woman diagnosed with celiac disease (CD), a condition triggered by an immune response to gluten, leading to inflammation in the small intestine. The patient manifested typical gastrointestinal symptoms, including diarrhea, abdominal pain, and vomiting, complemented by extra-intestinal signs such as fatigue and skin rashes. Diagnosis was corroborated through the presence of tTG-IgA antibodies and distinct histological changes in the duodenum. A notable finding was the patient's iron deficiency anemia, directly linked to the duodenal damage caused by CD. Effective management, encompassing a strict gluten-free diet and iron supplementation, resulted in marked improvement in her condition. This case accentuates the significance of early CD detection, especially in patients exhibiting a combination of gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms. Emphasis is placed on the pivotal role of timely diagnosis, adherence to a gluten-free regimen, and sustained monitoring to ensure patient well-being and prevent complications.
PubMed: 37736457
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43839 -
JAMA Dermatology Nov 2023Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are chronic relapsing-remitting conditions with significant morbidity. Skin-related quality of life (SRQL) may vary by AIBD subtype...
IMPORTANCE
Autoimmune bullous diseases (AIBDs) are chronic relapsing-remitting conditions with significant morbidity. Skin-related quality of life (SRQL) may vary by AIBD subtype and disease type. Disease severity and flare severity can be difficult to define; SRQL can offer a key insight.
OBJECTIVES
To investigate the Skindex-16 score as an SRQL measure in AIBD subtypes during flare and nonflare states and to evaluate Skindex-16 construct validity.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from September 1, 2016, to February 1, 2020, among 192 patients at the University of Utah Health autoimmune dermatology clinic with pemphigoid, pemphigus, dermatitis herpetiformis, and linear immunoglobulin A disease. Patients had an encounter-associated diagnosis, Skindex-16 scores, and self-reported flare status. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2022 to June 2023.
EXPOSURE
Autoimmune bullous disease subtype and patient-reported flare status.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Skindex-16 domain scores (emotions, symptoms, and functioning; range, 0-100, where 0 indicates no effect on SRQL and 100 maximum effect) and individual item scores were described by disease and flare status. Flare scores were expected to be higher by at least the standard error of measurement (SEm). Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman correlation among Skindex-16 scores, serologic titers, and other patient-reported outcome measures. Floor or ceiling domain scores (<20% of sample scoring either lowest or highest possible domain scores, respectively) were assessed for Skindex-16. Structural validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
RESULTS
The study included 192 patients with 212 visits (median age, 68 years [IQR, 58-76 years]; 123 of 212 women [58.0%]) with Skindex-16 scores (64 in flare state and 148 in nonflare state). Median Skindex-16 domain scores were higher for all disease categories among patients in the flare state compared with those in the nonflare state (pemphigoid [emotions: flare, 52.4 (IQR, 38.1-69.0); nonflare, 7 (IQR, 0-17); symptoms: flare, 37.5 (IQR, 29.2-58.0); nonflare, 13 (IQR, 0-25); functioning: flare, 26.7 (IQR, 10.0-56.7); nonflare, 0 (IQR, 0-3)]; pemphigus [emotions: flare, 54.8 (IQR, 31.0-81.0; nonflare, 0 (IQR, 0-19); symptoms: flare, 58.3 (IQR, 41.7-70.8); nonflare, 4 (IQR, 0-12.5); functioning: flare, 26.7 (IQR, 13.3-83.3); nonflare, 0 (IQR, 0-3.33)]; dermatitis herpetiformis [emotions: flare, 72.6 (IQR, 34.7-90.5); nonflare, 14.3 (IQR, 2.4-26.2); symptoms: flare, 69 (IQR, 31.3-85.4); nonflare, 12.5 (IQR, 0-29.2); functioning: flare, 38.3 (IQR, 5.0-63.2); nonflare, 0 (IQR, 0-13.3)]. This difference exceeded SEm cut points. Cronbach α was greater than 0.80 for all domains and AIBDs. Moderate or low correlations were seen with desmoglein 1 and bullous pemphigoid 180 titers. Moderate correlation existed between Skindex-16 and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression scores (emotions: ρ = 0.40; symptoms: ρ = 0.41; functioning: ρ = 0.48), and strong correlation existed between Skindex-16 and patient-reported disease severity (emotions: ρ = 0.71; symptoms: ρ = 0.73; functioning: ρ = 0.66). Floor domain scores greater than 20% were seen among patients in the nonflare state, but ceiling domain scores were rare (<10% for all domains); CFA model fit was poor.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cross-sectional study, SRQL was highly associated with flare of AIBDs. Skin-related quality of life was worse during periods without flare among patients with pemphigoid and dermatitis herpetiformis compared with pemphigus, highlighting residual SRQL morbidity. Skindex-16 showed good construct validity, but the poor CFA model fit needs further research. Clinical measurement of SRQL in AIBDs can add critical disease-severity information.
Topics: Humans; Female; Aged; Pemphigus; Quality of Life; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Retrospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dermatitis Herpetiformis; Autoimmune Diseases; Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous; Disease Progression
PubMed: 37703003
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3121