-
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jul 2024Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are frequently employed in immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction (iPBR) to provide structural support. Despite differences in... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are frequently employed in immediate prosthesis-based breast reconstruction (iPBR) to provide structural support. Despite differences in ADM derivatives, few studies directly compare their outcomes in the setting of iPBR. We sought to conduct a large head-to-head study comparing 3 ADMs used across our institution.
METHODS
A multicenter retrospective review of patients undergoing iPBR with SurgiMend PRS (fetal bovine-derived; Integra Lifesciences, Princeton, NJ), AlloDerm (human-derived; LifeCell Corp, Bridgewater, NJ), or DermACELL (human-derived; Stryker Corp, Kalamazoo, MI) between January 2014 to July 2022 was performed. Primary outcomes included rates of unplanned explantation and total reconstructive failure. Secondary outcomes included 90-day postoperative complications and long-term rates of capsular contracture development.
RESULTS
A total of 738 patients (1228 breasts) underwent iPBR during the study period; 405 patients received DermACELL (54.9%), 231 received AlloDerm (31.3%), and 102 received SurgiMend PRS (13.8%). Rates of short-term complications, total reconstruction failure, reoperation within 90 days, capsular contracture, and unplanned explantation were comparable. These findings remained true upon multivariate analysis accounting for baseline differences between cohorts, whereby ADM type was not an independent predictor of any outcome of interest. Conversely, factors such as body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiation, skin-sparing mastectomy, Wise pattern and periareolar incisions, use of tissue expanders, and a subpectoral plane of insertion were significant predictors of postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION
Low rates of complications support the equivalency of fetal bovine and human-derived ADMs in iPBR. Patient characteristics and operative approach are likely more predictive of postoperative outcomes than ADM derivative alone.
Topics: Humans; Female; Retrospective Studies; Acellular Dermis; Middle Aged; Adult; Collagen; Breast Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Breast Implants; Breast Implantation; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38885163
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003990 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jul 2024Symptomatic macromastia can significantly affect both physical and mental health. Although previous studies suggested that breast reduction (BR) improves quality of life...
BACKGROUND
Symptomatic macromastia can significantly affect both physical and mental health. Although previous studies suggested that breast reduction (BR) improves quality of life and mental health conditions, they were limited to smaller sample sizes and largely based on survey feedback. This study aims to further assess the impact of BR on mental health outcomes, specifically looking at prescribing patterns for common antidepressants.
METHODS
A national insurance-based database was utilized for data collection. Patients with a diagnosis of macromastia (ICD-10 N62) between the years 2010 and 2021 that either underwent bilateral BR (CPT 19318) or did not undergo BR were included in the study. Demographics and medical comorbidities were compared. Among those who underwent BR, preoperative and postoperative rates of mental health diagnoses and antidepressant use were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine variables associated with surgery.
RESULTS
Patients with a history of macromastia with a history of BR were compared with those with a history of macromastia without BR. A significantly higher percentage of patients in the BR group reported a history of depression (48.5%), obesity (55.7%), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) use (55.3%) when compared with that of the no-reduction group (46.3%, 50.8%, and 52.6%). Patients with history of depression and obesity were more likely to undergo BR (odds ratio of 1.11 and 1.31). Patients who underwent BR had significantly reduced rates of mental health outcomes including depression (38.6% to 27.4%), anxiety (4.3% to 3.1%), and SSRI or SNRI prescriptions (46.3% to 29.5%) postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
Patients who underwent BR for symptomatic macromastia showed significantly reduced rates of depression, anxiety, and most importantly, rates of SSRI/SNRI prescriptions postoperatively when compared to those who did not undergo BR for symptomatic macromastia.
Topics: Humans; Female; Hypertrophy; Mammaplasty; Adult; Middle Aged; Breast; Retrospective Studies; Antidepressive Agents; Mental Health; Depression; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38885162
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003987 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jul 2024This study aims to investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications of distinct implant-based breast reconstruction modality for patients with...
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to investigate the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and complications of distinct implant-based breast reconstruction modality for patients with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).
METHODS
A retrospective review was conducted on breast cancer patients with stage II-III disease who performed implant-based breast reconstruction following with PMRT between September 2016 and April 2022. The patients were categorized into two matched groups: (1) patients receiving prepectoral breast reconstruction (PBR) or (2) subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR) followed by PMRT. Following reconstruction, the patients were further compared for PMRT with the tissue expander (PMRT-TE) versus PMRT with permanent implant (PMRT-PI). PROs were measured with BREAST-Q questionnaire. Early and late complications were recorded and analyzed.
RESULTS
A total of 55 eligible patients were recruited. Patients who underwent PBR reported significantly higher satisfaction with breasts scores (P = 0.003) compared with the SBR group. The PMRT-TE group had higher satisfaction with breasts (P = 0.001) but lower physical well-being (P = 0.029) scores compared with PMRT-PI group. Moreover, patients in SBR cohort had a higher risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) (20.5% vs 6.3%) and implant dislocation (48.7% vs 12.5%) than patients in PBR cohort. Patients in PMRT-PI group had a slightly higher rate of capsular contracture (Baker grade III or IV) than PMRT-TE group (20.8% vs 12.9%).
CONCLUSIONS
PBR was associated with lower rates of late complications, especially for implant dislocation, and higher satisfaction with breasts scores compared to SBR. In addition, compared to PMRT-TE with PMRT-PI, patients in PMRT-TE cohort reported superior PROs of satisfaction with breasts.
Topics: Humans; Female; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy; Breast Implantation; Postoperative Complications; Breast Implants; Adult; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Patient Satisfaction; Mammaplasty
PubMed: 38885161
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003974 -
The British Journal of Surgery Jun 2024Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery may allow women with early breast cancer to avoid a mastectomy, but many women undergo more extensive surgery, even when...
BACKGROUND
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery may allow women with early breast cancer to avoid a mastectomy, but many women undergo more extensive surgery, even when breast-conserving options are offered. The aim of the ANTHEM qualitative study was to explore factors influencing women's surgical decision-making for and against oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery.
METHODS
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of women who had received either oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery or a mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction to explore their rationale for procedure choice. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Trial registration number: ISRCTN18238549.
RESULTS
A total of 27 women from 12 centres were interviewed. Out of these, 12 had chosen oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and 15 had chosen a mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Overwhelmingly, women's decisions were guided by their surgical teams. Decision-making for and against oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery was influenced by three key inter-related factors: perceptions of oncological safety; the importance of maintaining/restoring femininity and body image; and practical issues. Oncological safety was paramount. Women who reported feeling reassured that oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery was oncologically safe were happy to choose this option. Those who were not reassured were more likely to opt for a mastectomy, as a perceived 'safer' option. Most women wished to maintain/restore femininity, with the offer of immediate breast reconstruction essential to make a mastectomy an acceptable option. Practical issues such as the perceived magnitude of the surgery were a lesser concern.
CONCLUSION
Decision-making is complex and heavily influenced by the surgical team. High-quality, accurate information about surgical options, including appropriate reassurance about the short- and long-term oncological safety of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery is vital if women are to make fully informed decisions.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy, Segmental; Middle Aged; Decision Making; Qualitative Research; Adult; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Aged; United Kingdom; Interviews as Topic
PubMed: 38877844
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae133 -
Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Et... Jun 2024Breastfeeding has been widely encouraged by health care systems for many years. Breast reduction or mastopexy, are very frequent procedures often performed on young...
Breastfeeding has been widely encouraged by health care systems for many years. Breast reduction or mastopexy, are very frequent procedures often performed on young women. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of breast surgery on breastfeeding by comparing the success rate of breastfeeding in operated women versus unoperated women. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the breastfeeding success rate according to the surgical technique or the weight resected. A retrospective comparative study was conducted. Women of childbearing age who underwent breast reduction surgery or mastopexy at Henri-Mondor Hospital were contacted to answer a questionnaire about their pregnancies. Two hundred nine patients answered and two groups of patients were constituted, a preoperative group of 104 women who had a pregnancy before surgery and a postoperative group formed by 61 women who had a pregnancy after surgery. Breastfeeding success rate was 82% in the preoperative group versus 41% in the postoperative group. A statistically significant difference was found on the success rate of breastfeeding, as well as the rate of exclusive breastfeeding, with significantly lower rates in the postoperative group. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the different pedicles used, neither according to the weight of the resected gland. The cause of failure in the postoperative group was in most cases insufficient milk. Breast reduction surgery or mastopexy seems to have negative impact on the ability of operated women to breastfeed. This impact is multifactorial so these results should be interpreted with caution and further studies are needed to improve the management of these patients.
PubMed: 38866681
DOI: 10.1016/j.anplas.2024.05.004 -
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Apr 2024The choice of pedicle in reduction mammaplasty is highly variable with prior studies demonstrating high patient satisfaction in most cases. This study aimed to examine...
PURPOSE
The choice of pedicle in reduction mammaplasty is highly variable with prior studies demonstrating high patient satisfaction in most cases. This study aimed to examine the impact of pedicle type on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing reduction mammaplasty.
METHODS
A total of 588 patients underwent bilateral reduction mammaplasty with Wise pattern or modified Robertson incision by 13 surgeons at a single institution. Clinical outcomes were compared according to the pedicle type in all patients and BREAST-Q responders (32% response rate). Survey respondents were sub-grouped by resection volume, and the BREAST-Q satisfaction scores were compared.
RESULTS
Among all included reduction mammoplasties, 439 (75%) were performed using inferior pedicles, and 149 (25%) using superior or superomedial pedicles. Responders and non-responders were similar in preoperative characteristics including age, body measurements, and comorbidities. Although a higher incidence of infection occurred among the responders, clinical outcomes were comparable across all pedicle types. A total of 187 patients completed the BREAST-Q. Compared to the superior pedicle group, respondents in the inferior pedicle group reported higher nipple satisfaction, even when adjusted for resection weight over 500 g. In contrast, the superior pedicle group had better sexual well-being scores, which persisted in resection weight less than 500 g (all p values <0.05).
CONCLUSION
Inferior pedicles were associated with greater nipple satisfaction and superior pedicles were associated with greater sexual satisfaction. Our findings suggest that those with resections less than 500 g were more satisfied with superior pedicles whereas those with greater resections were more satisfied with inferior pedicles.
PubMed: 38865843
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.012 -
Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira... 2024The radical change in the treatment of breast cancer has promoted the necessity for more comprehensive training of the professionals involved, ensuring the preservation... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The radical change in the treatment of breast cancer has promoted the necessity for more comprehensive training of the professionals involved, ensuring the preservation of oncological safety while also allowing for cosmetic interventions to benefit breast cancer survivors. The aim of this study was to present the methods employed in the training of breast surgeons, highlighting the importance of oncoplasty and breast reconstruction.
METHODS
A literature review was conducted in two databases, identifying articles related to medical education in the context of oncoplastic surgery and breast reconstruction. We also assessed the Brazilian experience in oncoplastic centers.
RESULTS
The basis for educational discussions was derived from 16 articles. We observed approaches that included hands-on courses utilizing simulator models, porcine models, cadaver labs, and fellowship programs. Positive outcomes were observed in Brazil, a fact based on seven oncoplasty training centers for senior mastologists and five training centers for junior mastologists. From 2009 to 2023, an estimated 452 seniors and 42 juniors received training, representing approximately 30% of mastologists in Brazil who have acquired training and experience in oncoplasty.
CONCLUSION
Despite the limited number of publications on training methods, oncoplastic centers have made significant progress in Brazil, establishing a successful model that can be replicated in other countries.
Topics: Humans; Mammaplasty; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Brazil; Mastectomy; Clinical Competence
PubMed: 38865539
DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.2024S119 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jun 2024Individual outcomes may not accurately reflect the quality of perioperative care. Textbook outcomes (TOs) are composite metrics that provide a comprehensive evaluation...
BACKGROUND
Individual outcomes may not accurately reflect the quality of perioperative care. Textbook outcomes (TOs) are composite metrics that provide a comprehensive evaluation of hospital performance and surgical quality. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and predictors of TOs in a multi-institutional cohort of patients who underwent breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps.
METHODS
For autologous reconstruction, a TO was previously defined as a procedure without intraoperative complications, reoperation, infection requiring intravenous antibiotics, readmission, mortality, systemic complications, operative duration ≤12 hours for bilateral and ≤10 hours for unilateral/stacked reconstruction, and length of stay (LOS) ≤5 days. We investigated associations between patient-level factors and achieving a TO using multivariable regression analysis.
RESULTS
Of 1000 patients, most (73.2%) met a TO. The most common reasons for deviation from a TO were reoperation (9.6%), prolonged operative time (9.5%), and prolonged LOS (9.2%). On univariate analysis, tobacco use, obesity, widowed/divorced marital status, and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy or bilateral reconstruction were associated with a lower likelihood of TOs (P < 0.05). After adjustment, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (odds ratio [OR], 5.71; P = 0.029) and hormonal therapy (OR, 1.53; P = 0.050) were associated with a higher likelihood of TOs; higher body mass index (OR, 0.91; P = <0.001) was associated with a lower likelihood.
CONCLUSION
Approximately 30% of patients did not achieve a TO, and the likelihood of achieving a TO was influenced by patient and procedural factors. Future studies should investigate how this metric may be used to evaluate patient and hospital-level performance to improve the quality of care in reconstructive surgery.
Topics: Humans; Female; Mammaplasty; Middle Aged; Perforator Flap; Adult; Retrospective Studies; Breast Neoplasms; Epigastric Arteries; Microsurgery; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Mastectomy; Length of Stay
PubMed: 38857013
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003950 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jun 2024Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is often used when tumor location prohibits performing a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). We examined a square excision of the...
INTRODUCTION
Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is often used when tumor location prohibits performing a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). We examined a square excision of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and an X-shaped purse string closure after implant-based reconstruction.
METHODS
A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing periareolar SSM and immediate implant-based reconstruction from January 2015 through December 2022, specifically identifying those patients who had square NAC excision and skin closure.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. They underwent 54 periareolar SSM and immediate implant-based reconstruction (bilateral 25, unilateral 4). Indications for surgery were cancer (30) and prophylactic (24; 2 patients had bilateral cancer). Reconstructive methods included tissue expander (TE) (36 [66.7%]) and direct-to-implant (DTI) (18 [33.3%]). The mean mastectomy weights and final implant sizes were similar between the 2 groups. Overall wound complications occurred in 13 (24.1%) of the breasts: mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN; 10 [18.5%]) and infection (3 [5.6%]). Reconstructive failure occurred in 3 cases: TE, 1 (infection); DTI, 2 (MSFN/exposure). MSFN by reconstructive method: TE, 4 (11.1%); DTI, 6 (33.3%) (P = 0.05, comparing MSFN rates between TE and DTI methods). The mean initial TE fill volume was 247.1 cc; mean implant size in the DTI group was 417.8 cc (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
The square NAC excision and closure can minimize the surgical incision in implant reconstruction. Two-stage TE reconstruction permits lower initial fill volumes, which reduces the risk of MSFN after box to X closure of SSM and implant-based reconstruction. It is useful in small- to moderate-sized breasts with mild ptosis in patients who are not candidates for NSM.
Topics: Humans; Female; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Adult; Mastectomy, Subcutaneous; Mammaplasty; Breast Implants; Breast Implantation; Nipples; Organ Sparing Treatments; Aged; Mastectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38857011
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003946 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jun 2024The Goldilocks breast reconstruction utilizes redundant mastectomy skin flaps to fashion a breast mound; however, there is concern that imbrication of these skin flaps...
BACKGROUND
The Goldilocks breast reconstruction utilizes redundant mastectomy skin flaps to fashion a breast mound; however, there is concern that imbrication of these skin flaps may predispose to fat necrosis and make detection of local breast cancer recurrence more difficult. Goldilocks patients follow a traditional postmastectomy screening pathway that includes clinical examination for locoregional recurrence, but it is unclear if this is sufficient. We evaluate our Goldilocks reconstruction case series to determine rates of diagnostic imaging, biopsy, and locoregional and distant recurrence.
METHODS
Sixty-six patients (94 breasts) undergoing Goldilocks breast reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. Any diagnostic postoperative imaging/biopsies performed and that confirmed local or distant breast cancer recurrence were noted.
RESULTS
Average time of follow-up was 45 months. Most patients in this cohort had stage 0 (27.3%) or stage I (40.9%) breast cancer. There were a total of 11 (11.7%) concerning breast masses identified. Seven (7.4%) masses were biopsied, of which 5 were benign and 2 were invasive cancer recurrence. Four masses (4.3%) underwent diagnostic imaging only, all with benign findings. Five patients in this series were found to have either distant disease or a second primary cancer in the nonoperative contralateral breast.
CONCLUSIONS
Rates of local recurrence following Goldilocks are not higher than expected after other types of postmastectomy reconstruction. Clinical monitoring successfully detected local recurrence in all affected patients in this series. More definite guidelines around the routine screening of Goldilocks mastectomy patients may aid in early detection of local breast cancer recurrence.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Adult; Mammaplasty; Aged; Mastectomy; Follow-Up Studies; Surgical Flaps
PubMed: 38857009
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003952