-
World Journal of Surgical Oncology Jun 2024The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and mastectomy alone in locally advanced breast...
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) and mastectomy alone in locally advanced breast cancer patients.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive literature search of PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcomes evaluated were overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence. The secondary outcome was the incidence of surgical complications. All data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies, involving 15,364 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled data demonstrated that patients underwent IBR were more likely to experience surgical complications than those underwent mastectomy alone (HR: 3.96, 95%CI [1.07,14.67], p = 0.04). No significant difference was found in overall survival (HR: 0.94, 95%CI [0.73,1.20], p = 0.62), disease-free survival (HR: 1.03, 95%CI [0.83,1.27], p = 0.81), or breast cancer specific survival (HR: 0.93, 95%CI [0.71,1.21], p = 0.57) between IBR group and Non-IBR group.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrates that IBR after mastectomy does not affect the overall survival and disease-free survival of locally advanced breast cancer patients. However, IBR brings with it a nonnegligible higher risk of complications and needs to be fully evaluated and carefully decided.
PubMed: 38918808
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03444-z -
Clinical Breast Cancer Jun 2024Chronic postoperative surgical pain (CPSP) is a frequent complication following breast surgery and poses a challenge in terms of treatment. We hypothesized that the...
BACKGROUND
Chronic postoperative surgical pain (CPSP) is a frequent complication following breast surgery and poses a challenge in terms of treatment. We hypothesized that the incidence of CPSP would be reduced at 3 months post-breast surgery with the administration of S-ketamine compared to a placebo.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Participants were recruited and randomly assigned to either the S-ketamine group (S) or the control group (C). In group S, S-ketamine was administered as a 1.5 mg kg bolus followed by 2 mg kgh infusion, while in group C, a placebo of 0.9% saline was administered in the same volume and rate as S-ketamine. The primary outcome was the incidence of CPSP, measured using a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS), at 3 months postsurgery.
RESULTS
A total of 72 patients scheduled for mastectomy were enrolled (group S, n = 33; group C, n = 32). The incidence of CPSP at 3 months postsurgery was significantly lower in group S compared to group C (18.2% vs. 48.3%, P < .05). There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in terms of the incidence of moderate to severe pain. NRS scores for postoperative pain at rest and during movement were significantly lower at 4 h and 24 h post-surgery (P < .05, respectively). Patients in Group S had lower Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores at one week and 3 months post-surgery compared to Group C (P < .05, respectively).
CONCLUSION
S-ketamine infusion reduces the incidence of CPSP 3 months after breast surgery.
PubMed: 38918160
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.06.003 -
JAMA Network Open Jun 2024Although most women with BRCA-associated breast cancer choose bilateral mastectomy, current guidelines support breast-conserving therapy as an option. As the indications...
IMPORTANCE
Although most women with BRCA-associated breast cancer choose bilateral mastectomy, current guidelines support breast-conserving therapy as an option. As the indications for genetic testing expand and targeted therapies emerge, understanding the outcomes of breast-conserving therapy in the population of patients choosing breast conservation is important.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the clinical outcomes of women with BRCA-associated breast cancer who were treated with breast-conserving therapy, including the risks of ipsilateral and contralateral cancer events and bilateral mastectomy-free survival.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cohort study conducted at a single-institution academic national comprehensive cancer center included 172 women identified from a prospectively maintained database who had pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants and were treated with breast-conserving therapy from January 1, 1977, to December 31, 2021.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Clinical and pathologic characteristics for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 were compared, and estimates of overall survival, bilateral mastectomy-free survival, distant disease-free survival, risk of ipsilateral breast cancer, and risk of contralateral cancer were computed.
RESULTS
The cohort included 172 women (mean [SD] age, 47.1 [11.7] years), with 42 (24.4%) receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer prior to 40 years of age. Compared with BRCA2 variant carriers (80 [46.5%]), women with BRCA1 variants (92 [53.5%]) were younger at breast cancer diagnosis and tended to have more advanced tumors, which were more likely to be hormone receptor negative and higher grade. At a median follow-up of 11.8 years (IQR, 5.7-18.2 years), estimates of 10-year survival and risk were: overall survival, 88.5% (95% CI, 83.1%-94.2%); bilateral mastectomy-free survival, 70.7% (95% CI, 63.3%-78.9%); risk of an ipsilateral breast cancer event, 12.2% (95% CI, 5.8%-18.2%); and risk of contralateral cancer, 21.3% (95% CI, 13.3%-28.6%). Risks continued to increase after 10 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this cohort study, although women with breast cancer and pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants treated with breast-conserving therapy had above-average risks of ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer events, most did not have another cancer event and remained bilateral mastectomy free. These findings may be useful for informing patients with BRCA variants choosing breast conservation.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Mastectomy, Segmental; Adult; BRCA2 Protein; BRCA1 Protein; Cohort Studies; Treatment Outcome; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 38916888
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18486 -
Cureus May 2024Background Single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction after mastectomy has gained popularity over the last decade, thanks to the wide use of biological...
Background Single-stage direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction after mastectomy has gained popularity over the last decade, thanks to the wide use of biological matrices and synthetic meshes. Despite their high cost, there is no evidence of superior outcome from the biological matrices compared to the synthetic meshes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate our experience with TIGR, a synthetic, long-term absorbable mesh, in mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (MIBR) with a focus on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Methods This was a single-trust prospective quality improvement study conducted between 2017 and 2019. The main objectives were complication rates including infection, implant loss, and other surgical complications in patients undergoing TIGR mesh-assisted MIBR in the prepectoral plane for either cancer or risk reduction. PROMs were measured using the validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) breast questionnaire module. Clinical evaluations were conducted at one week, three weeks, and 12 months postoperatively. All patients provided written consent, and the audit was registered with the Quality Improvement Department of the organization. Results One hundred and twelve meshes were used in 93 patients with a mean age of 49 (24-75) years and a body mass index (BMI) of 23.4 (19.1-29.6). During the follow-up period, complications occurred in 26 patients (28%), including infection in four (4.3%), complete skin flap necrosis in one (1%), partial flap necrosis in three (3.2%), and implant loss in four (4.3%) patients. PROM data from 41 individuals indicated a moderate overall quality of life (82.7%), with high functional domain scores with relatively lower emotional functioning scores. Symptom domains generally scored poorly except for body image and sexual functioning. Conclusion Mastectomy and immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction using TIGR mesh is safe with low major complication rates. It is associated with high functional and quality of life scores but low scores in symptom domains which could be multifactorial. However, limitations due to study type and follow-up duration suggest caution in generalizing findings.
PubMed: 38915972
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61052 -
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Jun 2024To use robust consensus methods with individuals with lived breast cancer experience to agree the top 10 research priorities to improve information and support for...
PURPOSE
To use robust consensus methods with individuals with lived breast cancer experience to agree the top 10 research priorities to improve information and support for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery in the UK.
METHODS
Research uncertainties related to information and support for breast cancer surgery submitted by patients and carers were analysed thematically to generate summary questions for inclusion in an online Delphi survey. Individuals with lived breast cancer experience completed two Delphi rounds including feedback in which they selected their top 10 research priorities from the list provided. The most highly ranked priorities from the survey were discussed at an in-person prioritisation workshop at which the final top 10 was agreed.
RESULTS
The 543 uncertainties submitted by 156 patients/carers were categorised into 63 summary questions for inclusion in the Delphi survey. Of the 237 individuals completing Round 1, 190 (80.2%) participated in Round 2. The top 25 survey questions were carried forward for discussion at the in-person prioritisation workshop at which 17 participants from across the UK agreed the final top 10 research priorities. Key themes included ensuring patients were fully informed about all treatment options and given balanced, tailored information to support informed decision-making and empower their recovery. Equity of access to treatments including contralateral mastectomy for symmetry was also considered a research priority.
CONCLUSION
This process has identified the top 10 research priorities to improve information and support for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Work is now needed to develop studies to address these important questions.
PubMed: 38914917
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07413-8 -
Annals of Epidemiology Jun 2024Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy have similar survival for early-stage breast cancer, whereas observational...
BACKGROUND
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested breast conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy have similar survival for early-stage breast cancer, whereas observational studies reported survival advantage for BCT. We aimed to address biases in observational studies to compare the effect of BCT and mastectomy on survival.
METHODS
We emulated a target trial using institutional cancer registry. We included adult women diagnosed with early invasive first primary breast tumors ≤5cm between July 2011 and December 2017. We used cloning, censoring, and weighting to estimate risk differences (RDs) and risk ratios (RRs) for all-cause mortality and recurrence or all-cause mortality between BCT and mastectomy (reference).
RESULTS
Our study population comprised 534 observations with breast cancer. Median age was 56 years and 65% were racial/ethnic minorities. The 8-year RD was 1.5% (95% confidence limits [CL]: -7.0%, 9.8%) and RR was 1.1 (95% CL: 0.57, 2.2) for all-cause mortality. Results for recurrence or mortality were similar.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that target trial emulation to mitigate selection and immortal-time biases in observational studies may generate estimates that are more compatible with RCTs when comparing the effects of BCT and mastectomy on survival. Studies with longer follow-up and more events are needed to confirm our findings.
PubMed: 38914249
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2024.06.002 -
RoFo : Fortschritte Auf Dem Gebiete Der... Jul 2024
Topics: Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Reoperation; Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating; Preoperative Care; Mastectomy, Segmental; Mammography; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 38914056
DOI: 10.1055/a-2276-4478 -
International Journal of Applied &... 2024Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting vascular network, is essential for tumor growth and spread. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)...
CONTEXT
Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels from preexisting vascular network, is essential for tumor growth and spread. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent angiogenic growth factor.
AIMS
To assess the expression of VEGF in invasive carcinoma of no special type and its correlation with all the known prognostic factors of breast carcinoma.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN
Descriptive.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Mastectomy specimens were studied noting the clinical details. The formalin-fixed tissues were subjected to routine processing and hematoxylin and eosin sections and studied extensively for all the histological prognostic factors. Representative sections from each case with the tumor were subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining with VEGF, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu) antibodies.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED
Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests, contingency table analysis using SPSS for Windows.
RESULTS
One hundred and twelve cases of invasive carcinoma of special type were studied to evaluate various clinicopathological parameters. The association of VEGF with clinicopathological parameters and all the known prognostic factors was studied to note its significance. VEGF overexpression was observed in 69% of the cases. It was noted that larger tumor size, higher histological grade, lymphovascular invasion, nodal involvement, tumor necrosis, high microvessel density, ER negativity, PR negativity, and HER2/neu positivity had a significant statistical association with VEGF overexpression.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that incorporating VEGF as a biomarker along with the known factors into a prognostic index will not only help predict clinical outcome more accurately, but also determines the patient who can be benefited with combinational therapy including anti-VEGF factors.
PubMed: 38912361
DOI: 10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_17_24 -
Ochsner Journal 2024Male breast cancer remains relatively underexplored in the medical literature. At present, male patients with breast cancer follow the same treatment guidelines as...
Male breast cancer remains relatively underexplored in the medical literature. At present, male patients with breast cancer follow the same treatment guidelines as female patients with breast cancer, principally because of similar outcomes with treatment. However, this practice should not preclude generating evidence for male breast cancer surveillance, diagnosis, and management. BRCA2 gene mutations are associated with an increased risk of male breast cancer, along with lesser-known gene mutations that could also increase this risk, such as mutations of the BRIP1 gene. This case report presents a male patient with dual BRCA2 and BRIP1 deleterious gene mutations. To our knowledge, this combination has not been reported in the medical literature to date. A 53-year-old male presented with a palpable symptomatic mass underneath the right nipple-areolar complex. Biopsies confirmed a poorly differentiated, infiltrating ductal carcinoma that was estrogen and progesterone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative. The patient underwent a left modified radical mastectomy, with a right prophylactic simple mastectomy. Postoperatively, he underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy. This novel case of genetically based male breast cancer with dual deleterious gene mutations provides insight into current treatment recommendations and the subtle differences between male breast cancer and female breast cancer. Engaging in discussions surrounding such rare cases not only raises awareness of male breast cancer but also indicates the need for further research aimed at establishing evidence-based management strategies for male patients with breast cancer.
PubMed: 38912178
DOI: 10.31486/toj.23.0119 -
JPRAS Open Sep 2024Breast reconstruction following mastectomy is a critical component of breast cancer treatment, aimed at improving patient quality of life. However, the management is...
BACKGROUND
Breast reconstruction following mastectomy is a critical component of breast cancer treatment, aimed at improving patient quality of life. However, the management is fraught with potential complications, including skin necrosis and wound dehiscence, which can significantly impact clinical outcomes.
CASE PRESENTATION
We report a unique case of a patient, 5 years post-breast reconstruction following mastectomy and radiation therapy, who developed severe skin necrosis and wound dehiscence due to a brown recluse spider bite on the reconstructed breast. The complication necessitated the debridement of skin, removal of the implant, and further reconstruction with a latissimus flap.
DISCUSSION
The case underscores the unusual etiology of spider bite-induced necrosis in breast reconstruction and highlights the challenges and strategic considerations in managing such complications. Upon presentation, the patient's affected breast area showed signs of extensive necrosis and wound dehiscence, directly attributed to the cytotoxic effects of the brown recluse spider's venom. The venom's pathophysiology involves a complex cascade, leading to local and systemic effects. The local effects, marked by dermonecrosis, com- promised skin integrity in this instance. Systemic effects, not observed in this patient but potentially severe, can include hemolysis, coagulopathy, and acute renal failure, highlighting the seriousness of brown recluse spider bites.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this case illustrates the complexities of managing breast reconstruction post-mastectomy complications, particularly those caused by external factors such as brown recluse spider bites. It highlights the need for meticulous attention to unusual etiologies of necrosis and dehiscence, demonstrating the importance of adaptable surgical strategies and a thorough understanding of venom pathophysiology in ensuring successful patient outcomes.
PubMed: 38911670
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.05.008