-
Pediatric and Developmental Pathology :... 2023Odontogenic tumors are rare tumors of the jaws that arise from remnants of the tooth forming apparatus. Some odontogenic tumors demonstrate strong predilection for... (Review)
Review
Odontogenic tumors are rare tumors of the jaws that arise from remnants of the tooth forming apparatus. Some odontogenic tumors demonstrate strong predilection for pediatric patients including the unicystic ameloblastoma, adenomatoid odontogenic tumor, ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibro-odontoma, odontoma, and primordial odontogenic tumor. In this review, we discuss the clinical, radiographic, histopathologic, and molecular characteristics of select odontogenic tumors that demonstrate pediatric predilection and review management.
Topics: Humans; Child; Odontogenic Tumors; Ameloblastoma; Odontoma
PubMed: 38032744
DOI: 10.1177/10935266231200115 -
Dentistry Journal Oct 2023Odontomas are considered hamartomatous lesions and are one of the two most common odontogenic tumors of the jaw. Odontomas are classified as compound or complex....
Odontomas are considered hamartomatous lesions and are one of the two most common odontogenic tumors of the jaw. Odontomas are classified as compound or complex. Recently, ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFO) and ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma were reclassified as developing odontomas. Though clinically odontomas are usually asymptomatic, they have adverse effects on adjacent teeth such as tooth impaction, delayed eruption, displacement of teeth, over-retention of teeth, and can give rise to odontogenic cysts within the jaw. We sought to evaluate the clinicoradiopathologic presentations of odontomas by collecting and analyzing the clinical, radiographic, and pathologic data of odontomas diagnosed in our institution from 2013 to 2022. Over this 10-year period, there were 242 patients with a histopathological and/or radiographic diagnosis of odontoma. There was no gender predilection and ages ranged from 3 to 101 years (median, 14 years). The second decade of life was the most prevalent (57.4%). There was no jaw predilection; however, the anterior jaw was the most common location. Ninety-four (38.8%) cases presented with clinical findings. The most common finding was tooth impaction ( = 83). Nine (3.7%) cases were histopathologically confirmed to be associated with other lesions such as dentigerous cysts ( = 8) and nasopalatine duct cyst ( = 1). The median age (25 years) of patients diagnosed with odontomas associated with cysts was older than patients with odontomas (14 years) without associated cysts. Compound odontomas were the most common type of odontoma compared to complex and AFOs with 71.4%, 26.6%, and 2%, respectively. The majority of compound odontomas involved the anterior jaw (69.3%) and mandible (54.9%) while the majority of complex odontomas involved the posterior jaw (59.6%) and maxilla (54.7%). The four AFOs were in the posterior jaw and 75% involved the maxilla. The median age (12 years) of patients diagnosed with AFO was the youngest compared to patients diagnosed with compound (13 years) and complex (16 years). In conclusion, we analyzed the clinical, radiographic, and pathologic features of 242 new cases of odontomas. Our study reaffirms that odontomas frequently affect the pediatric population and can disrupt their dentition. Based on the result of this study, our clinical recommendation to prevent problems to adjacent teeth from odontomas is for dentists to be apt in the diagnose of odontomas to ensure that they are surgically removed in a timely manner.
PubMed: 37999017
DOI: 10.3390/dj11110253 -
BMC Oral Health Nov 2023Despite researchers' recent interest in identifying links between some dental and craniovertebral abnormalities, there are many important, unassessed gaps in our...
Associations across 22 dental and craniovertebral anomalies or variations, sagittal skeletal relationships, and vertical growth patterns: a comprehensive epidemiological study of 43 dentoskeletal traits.
INTRODUCTION
Despite researchers' recent interest in identifying links between some dental and craniovertebral abnormalities, there are many important, unassessed gaps in our knowledge of this matter. In addition, previous samples were small. This large study aimed to examine, for the first time, the occurrence/severity of numerous dental and skeletal anomalies or variations and their correlations with each other and with growth patterns.
METHODS
This epidemiological study was conducted on pretreatment radiographs of 1194 patients from 3 cities (815 females). Skeletal sagittal skeletal relationships and vertical growth patterns were determined. The occurrence/severity were assessed for: cervical vertebral fusion (CVF), atlas posterior arch deficiency (APAD), ponticulus posticus (PP), sella turcica bridging (STB), hypodontia, oligodontia, hyperdontia, missing of maxillary laterals, microdontia, macrodontia, root dilaceration, odontoma, taurodontism, dental fusion, dental gemination, enamel pearl, permanent molar ankylosis, primary molar ankylosis, dens in dente, dens invaginatus, dental impaction, ectopic eruption, and dental transposition. Incidental findings were recorded as well. Concurrent anomalies, sex dimorphism, and correlations across variables were examined statistically, adjusting for the false discovery rate (α = 0.05).
RESULTS
Prevalence was calculated for 43 dentoskeletal traits/anomalies (22 abnormalities/variations [plus their severities/types] as well as 21 incidentally found traits/anomalies). Dental impaction may be more common in hyperdivergent and severer cases of sella bridging; also, primary molar ankylosis was associated with missing teeth. Dental impaction was associated only with STB and not with PP, APAD, or vertebral fusion. The only association observed among the four skeletal anomalies was seen between APAD and CVF. Merely the variables 'sagittal skeletal relationships, vertical growth patterns, PP, and APAD' showed sexual dimorphism; of these, only vertical growth pattern and APAD remained sexually dimorphic after adjusting for the FDR; still, the other two remained marginally significant and worth further evaluations. Sex dimorphism did not exist in concurrent abnormalities. The skeletal Class III was associated with the concurrent occurrence of craniovertebral, dental, and dentoskeletal abnormalities. Skeletal Class I was associated with fewer occurrences of concurrent dental anomalies. Vertical growth patterns were not associated with concurrent dental or dentoskeletal anomalies. However, the hyperdivergent pattern was associated with fewer cases of concurrent craniovertebral abnormalities.
CONCLUSIONS
STB and hyperdivergent pattern were associated with dental impaction. However, APAD, CVF, or PP were not associated with dental impaction. APAD was associated with CVF. Sexual dimorphism existed conclusively in the case of vertical growth patterns and APAD. Concurrent abnormalities (dental, skeletal, and dentoskeletal) were associated with skeletal Class III.
Topics: Female; Humans; Tooth, Impacted; Tooth Ankylosis; Tooth Abnormalities; Anodontia; Tooth, Supernumerary; Epidemiologic Studies; Ankylosis
PubMed: 37978489
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-023-03504-y -
Cureus Sep 2023Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFO) is a rare, slow-growing neoplastic lesion classified as a benign, epithelial mixed odontogenic tumor with odontogenic mesenchyme. This...
Ameloblastic fibro-odontoma (AFO) is a rare, slow-growing neoplastic lesion classified as a benign, epithelial mixed odontogenic tumor with odontogenic mesenchyme. This tumor demonstrates the histological features characteristic of both ameloblastic fibromas and complex odontomas. The clinical manifestation of AFO is typically characterized by asymptomatic enlargement of the jawbones. Radiographically, it presents as a distinct radiolucent region, indicating the presence of radiopaque substances with varying degrees of irregularities in size and morphology. Standard therapeutic intervention involves enucleation. Despite its benign nature, AFO can cause significant morbidity if left untreated. Therefore, prompt diagnosis and appropriate management are essential to ensure optimal patient outcomes. The following case report details the clinical presentation and management of an 18-year-old male with an AFO lesion located in the posterior mandible. This particular case was treated with conservative measures involving surgical enucleation.
PubMed: 37908930
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46264 -
Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer... Oct 2023Ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma is considered a rare, benign, mixed odontogenic tumor that occurs mainly in the posterior mandible in the 1st-2nd decade of life. Although... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma is considered a rare, benign, mixed odontogenic tumor that occurs mainly in the posterior mandible in the 1st-2nd decade of life. Although the clinical behavior of Ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma is similar to that of ameloblastic fibroma, there is a debate about whether Ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma is a developing hamartomatous odontoma or a separate neoplastic odontogenic tumor like ameloblastic fibroma. However, it is important to understand the histopathogenesis of this rare tumor.
CASE PRESENTATION
A case report presenting an 11-year-old male child with a swelling in the posterior mandible. Radiographic examination revealed a multilocular lesion with mixed radiodensity related to the impacted lower left second premolar tooth. Incisional biopsy was done, and microscopic examination revealed cords and nests of odontogenic follicles lined by ameloblast-like cells and central stellate reticulum-like cells in the primitive ecto-mesenchymal stroma with areas of dentinoid material and osteodentin. The diagnosis was ameloblastic fibro-dentinoma. Surgical excision of the lesion was done, and the patient was followed up for 1 year without evidence of recurrence.
CONCLUSION
Reporting such a rare entity clarifies the debate about its nature and the importance of early diagnosis of lesions that are associated with unerupted teeth showing how it is effective in early management and prognosis.
Topics: Male; Child; Humans; Mandibular Neoplasms; Ameloblasts; Odontogenic Tumors; Odontoma; Fibroma
PubMed: 37899408
DOI: 10.1186/s43046-023-00193-0 -
Head and Neck Pathology Dec 2023Practically every facet of the most common odontogenic tumor, odontoma, has been covered by an extensive volume of literature. However, uncertainty about its precise... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Practically every facet of the most common odontogenic tumor, odontoma, has been covered by an extensive volume of literature. However, uncertainty about its precise history has persisted.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The historical evolution of odontoma was traced with reference to the original illustrations that accompanied European and American reports published at the beginning of the 19th century and also at the turn of the century.
RESULTS
The prevailing views regarding the first description of odontoma by Oudet of Paris in 1809 and the original designation "odontome" by Broca of Paris in 1867 are not entirely accurate. Before Broca's suggested term, "exostose dentaire" (dental exostosis) and "tumeur dentaire" (dental tumor) proposed by Oudet and Forget of Paris, respectively, were popular terms adopted in France, while in Briatin the terms "warty tooth" and "supernumerary teeth" proposed by Salter and Tomes of London, respectively, were widely coined. The original illustrations of complex odontoma were published by Wedl of Vienna in 1851, and in 1862 Tomes published the first drawing of compound odontoma denticles. Before the advent of diagnostic radiography in the early 1900s, spontaneous exposure or eruption of odontoma followed by secondary infection was very common. In 1887-1888, Bland Sutton of London criticized Broca's monumental research and formulated the first modern classification which, in essence, remains valid today. At that time, large osteomas of the maxilla were inappropriately classified as odontomas by many pathologists because of Bland Sutton's influential view. Interestingly, the first radiographic evidence of odontoma was published by the American oral surgeon Gilmer in 1899.
CONCLUSION
In view of their fundamental achievements, the names of Wedl, Salter, Broca and Bland Sutton have been closely associated with the true history of odontoma.
Topics: Humans; Odontoma; Tooth, Impacted; Odontogenic Tumors; Maxilla
PubMed: 37856052
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-023-01593-3 -
Compendium of Continuing Education in... Oct 2023Maxillary central incisors are critical to occlusal function, smile esthetics, and even one's self-image. Furthermore, their impaction at an early age could have harmful...
Maxillary central incisors are critical to occlusal function, smile esthetics, and even one's self-image. Furthermore, their impaction at an early age could have harmful psychological consequences on the individual. Maxillary central incisors can be impacted due to early dentoalveolar trauma to the upper anterior region that displaces the incisor in formation and, in rare instances, tooth germs are deformed. The aftermath of trauma during primary dentition is seen later during mixed dentition. Other causes are either an impediment in the eruption pathway of the maxillary central incisor due to the presence of odontomas or supernumerary teeth, an insufficient eruption space, or, very rarely, syndromic and/or other general medical conditions. Diagnosis is completed through a detailed medical/dental history, clinical evaluation, and appropriate imaging. Arch width increase, space opening, removal of obstructions if present, suitable soft-tissue management, well-designed orthodontic traction mechanics, and long-term periodontal follow-up are all essential elements in resolving cases of impacted maxillary central incisors.
Topics: Humans; Incisor; Maxilla; Esthetics, Dental; Tooth, Impacted; Decision Trees
PubMed: 37850955
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine :... Nov 2023CTNNB1 gene encodes beta catenin, a transcriptional activator of Wnt pathway involved in the pathogenesis of odontogenic lesions. Though located intramembranously, its... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
CTNNB1 gene encodes beta catenin, a transcriptional activator of Wnt pathway involved in the pathogenesis of odontogenic lesions. Though located intramembranously, its translocation into cytoplasm and nucleus could trigger cell proliferation, inhibition of apoptosis, invasion and migration of the tumour cell.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Five electronic databases including MEDLINE by PubMed, Google scholar, Scopus, Trip, Cochrane library and EMBASE until 1 January 2023 without period restriction were thoroughly searched. Those articles that identified CTNNB1 mutation and beta catenin in odontogenic lesions were included for review. Risk of bias was analysed for each study using QUADAS 2 tool and Review Manager 5.3 was used to output its result.
RESULTS
Thirty four published articles were included for data synthesis. A total of 1092 cases of odontogenic lesions were assessed for both CTNNB1 mutation and beta catenin expression. CTNNB1 mutation was observed in ameloblastoma, calcifying odontogenic cyst, calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour and all malignant odontogenic tumours. The beta catenin expression (nuclear and cytoplasmic) was maximum in odontogenic keratocyst and calcifying odontogenic cyst. The expression was variable in ameloblastomas, membranous in odontomas, calcifying cystic odontogenic tumour and nuclear in all malignant tumours.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
High recurrence of odontogenic keratocyst and aggressiveness of solid ameloblastoma and malignant odontogenic tumours could be associated with the nuclear translocation of beta catenin. Disparity between CTNNB1 mutation and beta catenin expression within odontogenic lesions suggests alternate routes of beta catenin activation. The review results support the unique localisation of beta catenin as a helpful diagnostic factor in the pathogenesis of odontogenic lesions.
Topics: Humans; Ameloblastoma; beta Catenin; Odontogenic Cyst, Calcifying; Odontogenic Cysts; Odontogenic Tumors
PubMed: 37840228
DOI: 10.1111/jop.13487 -
Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia... Nov 2023Odontogenic tumours are infrequent lesions. Studies on the frequency of odontogenic tumours from Latin America are scarce. This work aimed to determine the relative... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Odontogenic tumours are infrequent lesions. Studies on the frequency of odontogenic tumours from Latin America are scarce. This work aimed to determine the relative frequency of odontogenic tumours in a Chilean population using the 2022 World Health Organization classification.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This is a case series retrospective study. We reviewed 35,530 samples from 1975 to 2022 from the Oral Pathology Referral Institute and the Pathological Anatomy Service, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Chile. We utilized the 2022 World Health Organization classification for histological typification.
RESULTS
According to 2022 World Health Organization classification, 544 odontogenic tumours were confirmed. The most frequent odontogenic tumours were: odontoma (n=241; 44.3%), ameloblastoma (n=109; 20.0%) and cemento-ossifying fibroma (n=71; 13.1%). Benign odontogenic tumours corresponded to 538 cases (98.9%) and malignant tumours were only six cases (1.1%).
CONCLUSIONS
In our population, odontoma was the most frequent odontogenic tumour followed by ameloblastoma and cemento-ossifying fibroma. Malignant odontogenic tumours were very rare. The results of this study are similar to reports from America, but there are some differences concerning the data from Africa and Asia.
Topics: Humans; Ameloblastoma; Odontoma; Retrospective Studies; Cementoma; Chile; Odontogenic Tumors; World Health Organization
PubMed: 37823289
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.26008 -
International Journal of Surgery Case... Oct 2023Juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma is a rare benign tumor of childhood affecting the facial bones rarely described in literature. Its aggressive growth and high...
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE
Juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma is a rare benign tumor of childhood affecting the facial bones rarely described in literature. Its aggressive growth and high tendency of recurrence make it a real challenge for diagnosis and care.
CASE PRESENTATION
This article presents a case of an extensive juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma of the maxilla in a 14-year-old boy, which required surgical intervention with immediate bone reconstruction using an autogenous graft (iliac crest). No recurrence has been found after two and a half years of follow-up.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION
Common symptoms of juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma include painless swelling, facial asymmetry, jaw deformity and teeth displacement. Differential diagnosis should consider other forms like psammomatoid ossifying fibroma, osteofibrous dysplasia, fibrous dysplasia, ameloblastoma, odontoma, or even poorly differentiated carcinoma.
CONCLUSION
Currently, there is no recommendation or consensus for the treatment of juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma. The objective of treatment is also to preserve growth and development and conserve the nervous structure and the function, as mastication, vision. Early diagnosis and appropriate care are essential to prevent morphological and functional defects in young patients. Regular and long-term follow-up is essential due to the high recurrence rate.
PubMed: 37703694
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108620