-
Current Opinion in Critical Care Jun 2024The use of noninvasive techniques [noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy] to support oxygenation and/or ventilation in patients...
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
The use of noninvasive techniques [noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy] to support oxygenation and/or ventilation in patients with respiratory failure has become widespread, even more so since the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. The use of these modalities may impair the patient's ability to eat. "To breath or to eat" may become a dilemma. In this review, we identify the patients at risk of malnutrition that require medical nutritional therapy and understand the mechanisms of function of the devices to better give adapted nutritional indications for noninvasive ventilation or high flow nasal cannula.
RECENT FINDINGS
The Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition has been validated in the Intensive Care setting and can be used in patients requiring NIV. Many patients are underfed when receiving noninvasive ventilation therapies. HFNC may impair the swallowing ability and increase dysphagia while NIV may improve the swallowing reflexes. New technology preventing reflux and ensuring enteral feeding efficacy may increase the medical nutrition therapy safety and provide near-target energy and protein provision.
SUMMARY
The patient requiring noninvasive ventilation presents one of the most challenging nutritional challenges. The main steps to improve nutrition administration are to assess nutritional status, evaluate the presence of dysphagia, choose the most adequate tool of respiratory support, and adapt nutritional therapy (oral, enteral, or parenteral) accordingly.
PubMed: 38841984
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001171 -
Nutrition in Clinical Practice :... Jun 2024Focus on preterm nutrition strategies is imperative. Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is a clinically relevant, but seemingly elusive consequence, often used to...
BACKGROUND
Focus on preterm nutrition strategies is imperative. Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) is a clinically relevant, but seemingly elusive consequence, often used to benchmark and compare outcomes.
METHODS
This before-after observational study was designed to study the effect of a multipronged updated "nutrition care bundle" in very preterm infants on rate of EUGR compared with a cohort from a previous period. Eligible participants were neonates born at <32 weeks' gestation who completed care in the unit; a retrospective group from a previous period and a prospective cohort after implementation of the bundle were included. The bundle constituted of three key areas: (1) aggressive parenteral nutrition with high-dose amino acids and lipids from day 1, (2) "rapid-escalation" enteral feed regimens including earlier introduction of human milk fortifier (at 40-ml/kg/day feeds), and (3) colostrum mouth paint and structured oromotor stimulation to promote oral feeding. EUGR was defined as a z score difference of >-1 in weight for postmenstrual age (PMA) at discharge and at birth.
RESULTS
Data of 116 infants were retrieved for the retrospective group; 103 infants were included in the prospective group. EUGR was reduced from 71% to 58% (P = 0.039) after implementation of the bundle. Infants in the prospective group achieved full oral feeds at earlier PMA (P < 0.001) and were discharged at earlier PMA (P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
The proportion of neonates with EUGR was reduced significantly after implementation of the revised nutrition care bundle. Achievement of full oral feeds and discharge readiness were earlier in the prospective group.
PubMed: 38837805
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.11165 -
Advances in Mind-body MedicineWe present the case of 11 years of severe malabsorption, muscular atrophy, seizures, and immunodeficiency resolved after proximal intercessory prayer (PIP). A male...
We present the case of 11 years of severe malabsorption, muscular atrophy, seizures, and immunodeficiency resolved after proximal intercessory prayer (PIP). A male infant suffered from severe abdominal pain and impaired development with the introduction of solid food at age five months. The patient had previously appeared healthy, having been born to term and breastfed. Neocate and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) were prescribed, and the former was removed due to abdominal pain and diarrhea. Ultimately, the patient became completely dependent on TPN. It was concluded that he suffered from chronic, idiopathic, severe malabsorption. Development of neutropenia, hypogamma-globulinemia, and hypotonia was recorded. Medical records document atrophy and progressive deterioration of muscular symptoms. At five years of age, frontal lobe epilepsy was detected. Over the course of the disease, several genetic tests were performed. Doctors tried unsuccessfully to diagnose an underlying condition, with various mitochondriopathies and Shwachman-Diamond syndrome suggested as possible causes, but no prognosis of recovery was given. Eleven years following the initial presentation of symptoms, proximal intercessory prayer (PIP) was administered in a single session. The patient reported no unusual sensations during prayer. However, oral feedings were immediately tolerated without discomfort from that time onward. Post-PIP medical records indicate discontinuation of TPN, seizures, and seizure medications. Progressive improvement in the hematological disorders, BMI, and muscular symptoms was also observed. The present case report describes a novel association between PIP and the lasting resolution of multiple symptoms likely related to a genetic disorder. The results inform ongoing discussions about faith-based practices in health care and suggest the need for additional studies of PIP on health outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Male; Malabsorption Syndromes; Muscular Atrophy; Seizures; Child; Religion
PubMed: 38837782
DOI: No ID Found -
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine : a... Jun 2024To identify and geolocate pediatric post-acute care (PAC) facilities in the United States.
OBJECTIVES
To identify and geolocate pediatric post-acute care (PAC) facilities in the United States.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional survey using both online resources and telephone inquiry.
SETTING
All 50 U.S. states surveyed from June 2022 to May 2023. Care sites identified via state regulatory agencies and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
Number, size, and type of facility, scope of practice, and type of care provided. One thousand three hundred fifty-five facilities were surveyed; of these, 18.6% (252/1355) were pediatric-specific units or adult facilities accepting some pediatric patients. There were 109 pediatric-specific facilities identified within 39 U.S. states. Of these, 38 were freestanding with all accepting children with tracheostomies, 97.4% (37/38) accepting those requiring mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy, and 81.6% (31/38) accepting those requiring parenteral nutrition. The remaining 71 facilities were adult facilities with embedded pediatric units or children's hospitals with 88.7% (63/71), 54.9% (39/71), and 54.9% (39/71), accepting tracheostomies, mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy, and parenteral nutrition, respectively. Eleven states lacked any pediatric-specific PAC units or facilities.
CONCLUSIONS
The distribution of pediatric PAC is sparse and uneven across the United States. We present an interactive map and database describing these facilities. These data offer a starting point for exploring the consequences of pediatric PAC supply.
Topics: Humans; United States; Cross-Sectional Studies; Subacute Care; Child; Health Care Surveys
PubMed: 38836709
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003459 -
The British Journal of Nutrition Jun 2024Achieving optimal nutritional status in patients with penetrating Crohn's disease (CD) is crucial in preparing for surgical resection. However, there is a dearth of...
Impact of total parenteral nutrition versus exclusive enteral nutrition on postoperative adverse outcomes in patients with penetrating Crohn's disease undergoing surgical resection: A retrospective cohort study.
Achieving optimal nutritional status in patients with penetrating Crohn's disease (CD) is crucial in preparing for surgical resection. However, there is a dearth of literature comparing the efficacy of total parenteral nutrition (TPN) versus exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in optimizing postoperative outcomes. Hence, we conducted a case-matched study to assess the impact of preoperative EEN versus TPN on the incidence of postoperative adverse outcomes, encompassing overall postoperative morbidity and stoma formation, among penetrating CD patients undergoing bowel surgery. From December 1, 2012 to December 1, 2021, a retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary center to enroll consecutive patients with penetrating CD who underwent surgical resection. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to compare the incidence of postoperative adverse outcomes. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. The study included 510 patients meeting the criteria. Among them, 101 patients in the TPN group showed significant improvements in laboratory indicators at the time of surgery compared to pre-optimization levels. After matching, TPN was increased occurrence of postoperative adverse outcomes (92.2% vs. 64.1%, p = 0.001) when compared to EEN group. In the multivariate analysis, TPN showed a significantly higher odds ratio for adverse outcomes than EEN (OR = 4.241; 95% CI 1.567-11.478; p = 0.004). The study revealed that penetrating CD patients who were able to fulfill their nutritional requirements through EEN exhibited superior nutritional and surgical outcomes in comparison to those who received TPN.
PubMed: 38832664
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114524001247 -
Saudi Medical Journal Jun 2024To assess the risk variables related to the types of candidemia for each patient, who was admitted into the intensive care unit regardless of the patient with or without...
OBJECTIVES
To assess the risk variables related to the types of candidemia for each patient, who was admitted into the intensive care unit regardless of the patient with or without complete diagnosis of COVID-19, during the period of March 2019 to December 2022.
METHODS
The evaluation comparison of demographic and clinical data of COVID-19 positive and negative patients with candidemia confirmed in blood, 113 cases were assessed. Variables such as gender, age, age of hospitalization, history of hospitalization, concurrently infection, The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation-II scores, comorbidity checking, intubation, central venous catheter use, parenteral nutrition use, steroid use, antibiotic use, lymphopenia, and laboratory variables were evaluated. species distribution, antifungal susceptibility in blood culture were determined.
RESULTS
Coronavirus disease-19 was present in 62.8% of cases confirmed candidemia, and these cases were significantly different from COVID-19 negative cases. Significance was found in more intubation, central venous catheter use, parenteral nutrition, and steroid therapy in Group 2. There was no significance with species distribution and associated infection. In total, COVID-19 positive had higher hemoglobin, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine transaminase, and white blood cell levels, which may be associated with the possibility of revealing and controlling candidemia.
CONCLUSION
and () are the species seen in infected COVID-19 patients, while C. parapsilosis and are found in non-COVID-19 ones. Risk factors were intubation, parenteral nutrition, central venous catheter, and steroid in the COVID-19 group.
Topics: Humans; Candidemia; Risk Factors; Male; Female; Intensive Care Units; COVID-19; Middle Aged; Candida; Aged; Adult; Parenteral Nutrition; Candida albicans; Antifungal Agents; SARS-CoV-2; Candida tropicalis
PubMed: 38830660
DOI: 10.15537/smj.2024.45.6.20240102 -
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology... Jun 2024To review recent evaluations of pediatric patients with intestinal failure (IF) for intestinal transplantation (ITx), waiting list decisions, and outcomes of patients...
OBJECTIVES
To review recent evaluations of pediatric patients with intestinal failure (IF) for intestinal transplantation (ITx), waiting list decisions, and outcomes of patients listed and not listed for ITx at our center.
METHODS
Retrospective chart review of 97 patients evaluated for ITx from January 2014 to December 2021 including data from referring institutions and protocol laboratory testing, body imaging, endoscopy, and liver biopsy in selected cases. Survival analysis used Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS
Patients were referred almost entirely from outside institutions, one-third because of intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), two-thirds because of repeated infective and non-IFALD complications under minimally successful intestinal rehabilitation, and a single patient because of lost central vein access. The majority had short bowel syndrome (SBS). Waiting list placement was offered to 67 (69%) patients, 40 of whom for IFALD. The IFALD group was generally younger and more likely to have SBS, have received more parenteral nutrition, have demonstrated more evidence of chronic inflammation and have inferior kidney function compared to those offered ITx for non-IFALD complications and those not listed. ITx was performed in 53 patients. Superior postevaluation survival was independently associated with higher serum creatinine (hazard ratio [HR] 15.410, p = 014), whereas inferior postevaluation survival was associated with ITx (HR 0.515, p = 0.035) and higher serum fibrinogen (HR 0.994, p = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite recent improvements in IF management, IFALD remains a prominent reason for ITx referral. Complications of IF inherent to ITx candidacy influence postevaluation and post-ITx survival.
PubMed: 38828781
DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12274 -
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology... Jun 2024Long-term outcomes of congenital diarrheas and enteropathies (CODE) are poorly described. We evaluated the morbidity and mortality of children with CODE followed by an...
BACKGROUND
Long-term outcomes of congenital diarrheas and enteropathies (CODE) are poorly described. We evaluated the morbidity and mortality of children with CODE followed by an intestinal rehabilitation program (IRP) compared to children with short bowel syndrome (SBS).
METHODS
Matched case-control study of children with intestinal failure (IF) due to CODE (diagnosed between 2006 and 2020; N = 15) and SBS (N = 42), matched 1:3, based on age at diagnosis and duration of parenteral nutrition (PN). Nutritional status, growth, and IF-related complications were compared. Survival and enteral autonomy were compared to a nonmatched SBS cohort (N = 177).
RESULTS
Fifteen CODE patients (five males, median age 3.2 years) were followed for a median of 2.9 years. Eleven children were alive at the end of the follow-up, and two achieved enteral autonomy. The CODE group had higher median PN fluid and calorie requirements than their matched SBS controls at the end of the follow-up (83 vs. 45 mL/kg/day, p = 0.01; 54 vs. 30.5 kcal/kg/day, p < 0.01), but had similar rates of growth parameters, intestinal failure associated liver disease (IFALD), central venous catheter (CVC) complications and nephrocalcinosis. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses of 10-year survival and enteral autonomy were significantly lower in CODE patients compared to the nonmatched SBS population (60% vs. 89% and 30% vs. 87%, respectively; log-rank p < 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS
Despite higher PN needs in CODE, rates of IF complications were similar to matched children with SBS. Enteral autonomy and survival rates were lower in CODE patients. Treatment by IRP can mitigate IF-related complications and improve CODE patient's outcome.
PubMed: 38828718
DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12275 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) May 2024The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article...
Avoiding the use of long-term parenteral support in patients without intestinal failure: A position paper from the European Society of Clinical Nutrition & Metabolism, the European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility and the Rome Foundation for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.
The publisher regrets that this article has been temporarily removed. A replacement will appear as soon as possible in which the reason for the removal of the article will be specified, or the article will be reinstated. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.
PubMed: 38824102
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.027 -
Clinical Nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Jul 2024Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recognized as a complex high-risk therapy. Its practice is highly variable and frequently suboptimal in pediatric patients. Optimizing care... (Review)
Review
Parenteral nutrition (PN) is recognized as a complex high-risk therapy. Its practice is highly variable and frequently suboptimal in pediatric patients. Optimizing care requires evidence, consensus-based guidelines, audits of practice, and standardized strategies. Several pediatric scientific organizations, expert panels, and authorities have recently recommended that standardized PN should generally be used over individualized PN in the majority of pediatric patients including very low birth weight premature infants. In addition, PN admixtures produced and validated by a suitably qualified institution are recommended over locally produced PN. Licensed multi chamber bags are standardized PN bags that comply with Good Manufacturing Practice and high-quality standards for the finished product in the frame of their full manufacturing license. The purpose of this article is to review the practical aspects of PN and the evidence for using such multi-chamber bags in pediatric patients. It highlights the safety characteristics and the limitations of the different PN practices and provides some guidance for ensuring safe and efficient therapy in pediatric patients.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Parenteral Nutrition; Infant; Child; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Parenteral Nutrition Solutions; Infant, Premature; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
PubMed: 38823267
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.05.023