-
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2024Visceral pain occurs commonly following thoracic surgery, but an effective method to relieve visceral pain in thoracic surgery remains controversial. We test the effect...
BACKGROUND
Visceral pain occurs commonly following thoracic surgery, but an effective method to relieve visceral pain in thoracic surgery remains controversial. We test the effect of stellate ganglion blocks (SGB) on perioperative visceral pain following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
METHODS
A prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled 77 elderly patients undergoing VATS. Patients were randomized to SGB followed by modified intercostal nerve block (Group S, n=37); or modified intercostal nerve block only (Group C, n=40). Remifentanil 0.02-0.2 μg·kg-1·min-1 was titrated to keep pain threshold index values between 40-65 and maintain mean arterial pressure or heart rate values around 20% of baseline values. Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with sufentanil was used in the postoperative period. The co-primary outcomes were the perioperative cumulative opioid consumption and pain scores on movement at 24 h after surgery.
RESULTS
Compared with control group, SGB greatly reduced the intraoperative remifentanil consumption[300.00(235.00-450.00)μg versus 710.00(500.00-915.00)μg; P<0.01], with no difference in cumulative sufentanil consumption to 48h post-surgery. There was a statistically significant difference in pain scores on movement at 24h between groups [4.00(3.00-4.00) versus 4.00(3.25-5.00); P=0.01]. Further exploratory analyses showed significant difference for intra-chest pain on movement at 24h [3.00(2.00-3.00) versus 3.00(2.25-4.00); P=0.01]. No significant difference was observed in nausea/vomiting, time to pass flatus and postoperative length of stay.
CONCLUSION
Preoperative stellate ganglion blocks for elderly patients could effectively blunt intraoperative visceral stress and reduce postoperative visceral pain extending 24 h after VATS. This initial finding deserve further investigation.
PubMed: 38913440
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001867 -
Updates in Surgery Jun 2024The Rives-Stoppa (RS) procedure is a gold standard treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias. Comparability of pain control and outcomes to the enhanced-view totally...
Endoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal prosthetic (eTEP) versus open Rives-Stoppa repair as a treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias with rectus diastasis: comparison of postoperative pain and length of hospital stay in a single-centre surgical cohort.
The Rives-Stoppa (RS) procedure is a gold standard treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias. Comparability of pain control and outcomes to the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal prosthetic (eTEP) repair remain unclear. A single-centre retrospective surgical cohort was selected including 30 RS repairs (January 2019-November 2021) and 30 consecutive eTEP procedures (September 2021-August 2022) for midline abdominal wall hernia(s) with rectus abdominis diastasis. Postoperative pain and outcomes were compared up to 1 month. Presence and median duration of patient-controlled analgesia were, respectively, 90% and 3 nights with RS, versus 30% and 0 nights with eTEP. Median switch to only oral analgesics occurred at postoperative day (POD) 3 after RS and at POD 2 after eTEP. Postoperative analgesics and opioid prescription at discharge were comparable. Median length of hospital stay was six nights after RS versus 3 nights after eTEP. Median duration of surgery was 110.5 and 164.5 min for RS and eTEP, respectively. After RS, 30 patients had postoperative drain(s) compared to 3 patients after eTEP. Conversion was needed in 3 eTEP procedures. Postoperative complications were comparable. No early recurrences were observed. Minimal residual diastasis was seen at postoperative consultation in 11 patients after eTEP. Compared to RS, eTEP is a minimally invasive alternative treatment of midline abdominal wall hernias with rectus abdominis diastasis and is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay, less postoperative pain and a comparable risk of short-term complications. At 1 month after eTEP, minimal residual diastasis can be present. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05446675. Secondary identifying number: EC/EH/220608-SK. Date of Registration: June 24, 2022.
PubMed: 38909352
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01905-4 -
Substance Use & Addiction Journal Jun 2024Chronic pain is a significant factor for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) contributing to suboptimal retention in buprenorphine treatment, which is a crucial...
Study Protocol for Pain Self-Management and Patient-Oriented Buprenorphine Dosing for Pain and Retention in Office-Based Opioid Treatment: A Hybrid Type 1, 2 × 2 Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chronic pain is a significant factor for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) contributing to suboptimal retention in buprenorphine treatment, which is a crucial predictor of long-term health outcomes. This study aims to address the critical need for effective interventions targeting chronic pain management within office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) programs. We are conducting a multisite, hybrid type 1, 2 × 2 factorial randomized clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of 2 novel interventions, pain self-management (PSM) and patient-oriented buprenorphine dosing (POD), to decrease pain interference and improve retention in buprenorphine treatment. PSM, a manualized and customizable approach delivered through individual and peer-led group sessions, aims to decrease pain-related symptoms and quality of life. POD involves split dosing of buprenorphine to extend the duration of analgesia to better match its duration of efficacy at managing OUD symptoms, leading to improved retention in buprenorphine treatment. Eligible participants will be randomized into 1 of 4 groups: (1) PSM + POD, (2) PSM + Standard Buprenorphine Dosing, (3) Usual Care + POD, or (4) Usual Care + Standard Buprenorphine Dosing. Usual Care refers to usual care for chronic pain and Standard Buprenorphine Dosing refers to the participant's current dosing regimen. Secondary objectives encompass overall pain reduction, decreased opioid use, improved pain symptom management, and exploration of implementation strategies. The supplemental approved protocol provides comprehensive insights into the procedures and variables being investigated. As part of the HEAL Initiative-funded Integrative Management of Chronic Pain and OUD for Whole Recovery (IMPOWR) network, this study aims to fill gaps in behavioral and medication treatments for individuals with co-occurring chronic pain and OUDs, improving pain management and retention in care. Successful outcomes from this trial may inform future larger trials, offering essential evidence for implementation considerations and reimbursement decisions.
PubMed: 38907678
DOI: 10.1177/29767342241261562 -
Military Medicine Jun 2024Osseointegration is an innovative procedure to attach an external prosthetic device directly to the skeleton. The technique has been shown to improve physical function...
INTRODUCTION
Osseointegration is an innovative procedure to attach an external prosthetic device directly to the skeleton. The technique has been shown to improve physical function and quality of life relative to conventional socket prosthetic devices. While much of the research in osseointegration has focused on functional outcomes, less is known regarding perioperative pain management. The purpose of this study was to describe perioperative and postoperative pain management approaches received by patients undergoing osseointegration procedures at a tertiary medical center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This retrospective study was determined to be exempt from Institutional Review Board review by the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center Department of Research Programs. Perioperative and postoperative pain management approaches received by 41 patients who underwent 76 staged osseointegration procedures from 2016 to 2021 at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center were described.
RESULTS
Pain management approaches included perioperative ketamine (51% stage I, 55% stage II), epidurals (76% stage I, 77% stage II) with a median of 3-4 days across stages, peripheral nerve catheters (27% stage I, 16% stage II), and/or single-shot peripheral nerve block (<10% across stages). The median morphine equivalent dose provided during surgery was 65 mg across both stages, with 56% and 54% of patients also requiring opioid medication in the post-anesthesia care unit. In 11 of 76 (15%) procedures, patients required an increase in the rate or concentration of epidural or peripheral nerve catheter infusion. In six (8%) unique recovery periods, patients experienced a dislodged catheter. In 27 of 76 (36%) unique recovery periods, patients experienced a significant increase in postoperative pain requiring acute pain service intervention in the form of catheter adjustment, intravenous pain medications, and/or the addition of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Adequate pain control was achieved with minimal epidural or peripheral nerve catheter trouble-shooting and a bolus for 24 patients (89% requiring intervention). Summed 24-hour pain scores (SPI24) did not vary across stages. SPI24 was positively correlated with opioid doses received. Patients with single, relative to multiple, limb amputations had similar SPI24 values (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
Variability in pain management requirements calls forth opportunities to optimize osseointegration analgesia care and future research. As osseointegration becomes more accessible, the need for optimizing pain management through patient-centered research becomes more salient.
PubMed: 38907523
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usae320 -
Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Jun 2024To compare intravenous lidocaine, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and placebo on the quality of recovery and analgesia after laparoscopic...
STUDY OBJECTIVE
To compare intravenous lidocaine, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and placebo on the quality of recovery and analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
DESIGN
A prospective, triple-arm, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled non-inferiority trial.
SETTING
A single tertiary academic medical center.
PATIENTS
126 adults aged 18-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: intravenous lidocaine infusion (1.5 mg/kg bolus followed by 2 mg/kg/h) plus bilateral ESPB with saline (25 mL per side); bilateral ESPB with 0.25% ropivacaine (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion; or bilateral ESPB with saline (25 ml per side) plus placebo infusion.
MEASUREMENTS
The primary outcome was the 24-h postoperative Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. The non-inferiority of lidocaine versus ESPB was assessed with a margin of -6 points and 97.5% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcomes included 24-h area under the curve (AUC) for pain scores, morphine consumption, and adverse events.
MAIN RESULTS
124 patients completed the study. Median (IQR) 24-h QoR-15 scores were 123 (117-127) for lidocaine, 124 (119-126) for ESPB, and 112 (108-117) for placebo. Lidocaine was non-inferior to ESPB (median difference -1, 97.5% CI: -4 to ∞). Both lidocaine (median difference 9, 95% CI: 6-12, P < 0.001) and ESPB (median difference 10, 95% CI: 7-13, P < 0.001) were superior to placebo. AUC for pain scores and morphine use were lower with lidocaine and ESPB versus placebo (P < 0.001 for all), with no significant differences between lidocaine and ESPB. One ESPB patient reported a transient metallic taste; no other block-related complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS
For patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intravenous lidocaine provides a non-inferior quality of recovery compared to ESPB without requiring specialized regional anesthesia procedures. Lidocaine may offer a practical and accessible alternative within multimodal analgesia pathways.
PubMed: 38905964
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111528 -
American Family Physician Jun 2024Pregnancy dating is determined by the patient's last menstrual period or an ultrasound measurement. A full-term pregnancy is considered 37 weeks' gestation or more.... (Review)
Review
Pregnancy dating is determined by the patient's last menstrual period or an ultrasound measurement. A full-term pregnancy is considered 37 weeks' gestation or more. Spontaneous labor begins when regular painful uterine contractions result in a cervical change. Active labor begins at 6 cm dilation and is marked by more predictable, accelerated cervical change. In the absence of pregnancy complications, intermittent fetal auscultation may be considered as an alternative to continuous electronic fetal monitoring, which is associated with a high false-positive rate. Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is indicated in patients with group B streptococcus colonization or those at high risk to prevent newborn early-onset group B streptococcus. The likelihood of vaginal delivery is increased by providing continuous nonmedical support during labor, encouraging mobility, and using a peanut ball with epidural analgesia. Neuraxial analgesia is more effective for pain control than systemic opioids and is associated with fewer adverse effects. Delayed pushing during the second stage of labor has risks but does not affect the mode of delivery. Routine oropharyngeal suctioning of the newborn is not recommended, even with meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Delayed cord clamping reduces newborn anemia. Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in patients at risk includes prophylactic uterotonic administration and controlled cord traction. Perineal lacerations that alter anatomy or are not hemostatic should be repaired. (Am Fam Physician. 2024;109(6):525-532.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; Delivery, Obstetric; Infant, Newborn; Labor, Obstetric
PubMed: 38905550
DOI: No ID Found -
Anesthesia and Analgesia Jun 2024Three settings are required on a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) pump for labor analgesia: the PIEB next bolus (PIEBnb), PIEB interval (PIEBi), and PIEB...
BACKGROUND
Three settings are required on a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) pump for labor analgesia: the PIEB next bolus (PIEBnb), PIEB interval (PIEBi), and PIEB volume (PIEBv). The ideal settings for these parameters are still unknown. We hypothesized a mathematical modeling tool, response surface methodology (RSM), could estimate 3 PIEB pump parameters while balancing 3 clinically important patient outcomes simultaneously. The study objective was to use RSM to estimate PIEB settings (PIEBnb, PIEBi, and PIEBv) while maximizing maternal satisfaction, minimizing the need for clinician-administered boluses, and optimizing the ratio of delivered/requested patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses simultaneously.
METHODS
With institutional ethics approval, a double-blind randomized trial was completed in a tertiary care labor and delivery center. Nulliparous, English-speaking American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II patients aged 18 to 45 years at full term, single gestation in vertex presentation, in spontaneous labor and ≤7 cm cervical dilation were included. Patients with comorbidities, contraindications to neuraxial analgesia, using chronic analgesics, <152 cm, or body mass index (BMI) >45 kg/m2 were excluded. After informed consent, labor analgesia was initiated using 10 mL ropivacaine 0.2% with 10 µg/mL fentanyl solution and PCEA (volume 6 mL every 10 minutes). Patients were randomized to predetermined PIEB settings. RSM identified 3 pump settings that represented a stationary point that best maximized or minimized 3 outcomes simultaneously: PCEA ratio (a ratio closest to 1), clinician bolus (optimal is 0), and maternal satisfaction (visual analog scale, 0-100, ideal response is ≥90).
RESULTS
Of 287 potential participants, 192 did not meet inclusion criteria or declined to participate, and 26 were withdrawn, leaving 69 patients for study inclusion. Using RSM, the suggested PIEB settings for all the primary study outcomes were as follows: PIEBnb = 29.4 minutes, PIEBi = 59.8 minutes, and PIEBv = 6.2 mL. These PIEB settings corresponded to the following clinical outcomes: maternal satisfaction at 93.9%, PCEA ratio at 0.77, and need for clinician bolus at 0.29. The dermatome sensory score was between T10 and T5 in 89% of the patients. The median lowest Bromage score was 4.
CONCLUSIONS
This novel study used a mathematical model to estimate PIEB pump settings while simultaneously maximizing 3 clinical outcomes. Equally weighted clinical outcomes prevent maximal outcome optimization and may not reflect patient priorities. Future studies or quality improvement endeavors could use RSM methodology to estimate PIEB pump settings targeting optimal values for a single clinical outcome of determined importance to parturients.
PubMed: 38905148
DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006813 -
Insights Into Imaging Jun 2024To evaluate the safety of a minimum continuous positive airway pressure of 4 cmHO (CPAP + 4) during computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA)...
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the safety of a minimum continuous positive airway pressure of 4 cmHO (CPAP + 4) during computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for lung malignancies under procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA).
METHODS
This was a prospective, randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label medical device conducted at a single tertiary university hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Forty-six patients over 18 years of age scheduled for CT-guided RFA of a malignant pulmonary tumour under PSA were randomised to receive either CPAP + 4 or a modified mask for placebo CPAP (Sham-CPAP). Exclusion criteria included contraindications for RFA, refusal to participate, inability to understand the procedure or tolerate the CPAP test, lung biopsy just prior to RFA, intercurrent diseases, or previous randomisation for additional pulmonary RFA. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients reporting at least one serious adverse event (SAE), classification for complications from the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE), and Clavien-Dindo classifications for complications, hospital stay, and readmissions. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), respiratory parameters, airway management, and the local radiological efficacy of pulmonary ablation.
RESULTS
CPAP + 4 prolonged hospital stay (1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 1.0 ± 0 inpatient nights, p = 0.022) and increased the risk of AE post-RFA (odds ratio (95% CI): 4.250 (1.234 to 14.637), p = 0.021 with more pneumothorax cases (n = 5/22, 22.7% vs. n = 0/24, 0%, p = 0.019). Per-protocol analysis revealed more SAEs and CIRSE grade 3 complications in the CPAP + 4 group (23.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.036). No significant differences were found in the effectiveness of oxygenation, ventilation, or pulmonary ablation.
CONCLUSION
CPAP is unsafe during CT-guided RFA for lung cancer under PSA even at the lowest pressure setting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.Gov, ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02117908, Registered 11 April 2014, https://www.
CLINICALTRIALS
gov/study/NCT02117908 CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study highlights the hazards of continuous positive airway pressure during radiofrequency ablation of lung cancer, even at minimal pressures, deeming it unsafe under procedural sedation and analgesia in pulmonary interventional procedures. Findings provide crucial insights to prioritise patient safety.
KEY POINTS
No prior randomised controlled trials on CPAP safety in percutaneous lung thermo-ablation. Standardised outcome measures are crucial for radiology research. CPAP during lung RFA raises hospital stay and the risk of complications. CPAP is unsafe during CT-guided RFA of lung cancer under procedural sedoanalgesia.
PubMed: 38900225
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01721-9 -
World Journal of Clinical Cases Jun 2024Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is an inherited autosomal-recessive disorder of impaired mucociliary clearance characterized by chronic respiratory diseases,...
BACKGROUND
Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is an inherited autosomal-recessive disorder of impaired mucociliary clearance characterized by chronic respiratory diseases, otolaryngological diseases, central nervous system abnormalities, reproductive system abnormalities, and cardiac function abnormalities. General anesthesia in these patients is associated with a higher incidence of respiratory complications than in patients without the disease.
CASE SUMMARY
A 16-year-old male patient was referred to the emergency room complaining of right ankle pain due to distal tibiofibular fracture. Three years prior, he had been diagnosed with PCD. At that time, he had experienced several episodes of pneumonia, sinusitis, and chronic middle ear infections, for which he underwent surgical interventions. At the current admission, he presented with cough and sputum but no other respiratory symptoms. A chest computed tomography scan revealed centrilobular ground-glass opacities in both lower lobes and a calcified nodule in the left lower lobe. For the surgical procedure and postoperative pain management, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was employed. The patient's postoperative pain score was measured by the numerical rating scale (NRS). On the day of surgery, his NRS was 5 points. By the second postoperative day, the NRS score had decreased to 2-3 points. The epidural catheter was removed on the fourth day following the operation. The patient was subsequently discharged no respiratory complications.
CONCLUSION
We performed combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in a patient with PCD. The patient experienced no additional respiratory complications and was discharged with a low NRS score for pain.
PubMed: 38898834
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3183 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024Post-operative pain management is essential for optimizing recovery, patient comfort, and satisfaction. Peripheral nerve blockade, or lumbar plexus block (LPB), has... (Review)
Review
Post-operative pain management is essential for optimizing recovery, patient comfort, and satisfaction. Peripheral nerve blockade, or lumbar plexus block (LPB), has been widely used for analgesia and regional anesthesia. This study explored the existing literature to determine the efficacy of continuous lumbar plexus blockade in managing post-operative pain following hip or femur surgery. Reviewers comprehensively searched electronic databases to identify peer-reviewed scholarly articles reporting the efficacy of lumbar plexus block in managing post-operative pain after orthopedic surgery. The potential articles were carefully selected and assessed for the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias assessment tool. Data were systematically extracted and analyzed. The literature search yielded 206 articles, 20 of which were randomized controlled trials. Lumbar plexus block demonstrated superior pain relief compared to conventional pain management approaches like general anesthetics. In addition, LPB reduced patients' overall opioid consumption compared to controls, reduced adverse effects, and enhanced functional recovery, which underlines the broader positive impact of meticulous pain management. More patients could walk more than 40 feet after the second day post-operatively among the lumbar plexus group (14.7%) compared to the continuous femoral group (1.3%). Other parameters, including cortisol levels and hemodynamic stability, were evaluated, showing comparable outcomes. Lumbar plexus block is effective in pain management after orthopedic surgery, as shown by the lower pain scores and less opioid consumption. Additionally, patient satisfaction was relatively higher in LPB-treated patients compared to other approaches like general anesthesia.
PubMed: 38892904
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113194