-
Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi =... Jun 2024Effective pain management is vital in critical care settings, particularly post-surgery. Clinicians should maintain objective and efficient standards to assess pain in a... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Effective pain management is vital in critical care settings, particularly post-surgery. Clinicians should maintain objective and efficient standards to assess pain in a patient-centered manner, in order to effectively manage this complex issue. A newer technology, the nociception level (NOL) index, shows promise in achieving this task through its multi-parameter evaluation.
METHODS
This study was a prospective, controlled, randomized trial involving two groups of patients (n=30 each) in a diverse intensive care unit. Participants were over 18 years old with American Society of Anesthesiology scores ranging from I to III and were scheduled for critical care follow-up after general anesthesia. All subjects followed a standard analgesia protocol that included rescue analgesia. Drug administration was guided by a numeric rating scale and the critical care pain observation tool in the Control Group, while it was guided by nociception level index monitoring in the NOL Group.
RESULTS
Pain scores between the two groups did not significantly differ. However, within the NOL Group, pain scores and noci-ception values displayed a strong positive correlation. Notably, total analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the NOL Group (p=0.036).
CONCLUSION
Monitoring pain using the nociception level index is an effective method for detecting pain compared to standard pain scores utilized in critical care. Its guidance facilitates personalized analgesic titration. Additionally, the potential of nociception level index guidance to reduce the duration of intensive care and hospital stays may be linked to its effects on delirium, a connection that awaits further exploration in future studies.
Topics: Humans; Double-Blind Method; Male; Female; Pain Measurement; Prospective Studies; Middle Aged; Nociception; Critical Care; Adult; Pain Management; Prognosis; Intensive Care Units; Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesics
PubMed: 38863294
DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.95533 -
Medicina Intensiva Jun 2024The use of sedatives in Intensive Care Units (ICU) is essential for relieving anxiety and stress in mechanically ventilated patients, and it is related to clinical...
Practical approach to inhaled sedation in the critically ill patient. Sedation, analgesia and Delirium Working Group (GTSAD) of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC).
The use of sedatives in Intensive Care Units (ICU) is essential for relieving anxiety and stress in mechanically ventilated patients, and it is related to clinical outcomes, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the ICU. Inhaled sedatives offer benefits such as faster awakening and extubation, decreased total opioid and neuromuscular blocking agents (NMB) doses, as well as bronchodilator, anticonvulsant, and cardiopulmonary and neurological protective effects. Inhaled sedation is administered using a specific vaporizer. Isoflurane is the recommended agent due to its efficacy and safety profile. Inhaled sedation is recommended for moderate and deep sedation, prolonged sedation, difficult sedation, patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), status asthmaticus, and super-refractory status epilepticus. By offering these significant advantages, the use of inhaled sedatives allows for a personalized and controlled approach to optimize sedation in the ICU.
PubMed: 38862301
DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2024.05.011 -
Cureus May 2024This article discusses the management of ventricular storm (VS), a condition characterized by recurrent episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation,...
This article discusses the management of ventricular storm (VS), a condition characterized by recurrent episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, which poses a significant risk of mortality. Prompt intervention is crucial, yet surgical options are often limited due to the patient's unstable condition. This case report presents a 47-year-old female who experienced VS during a planned surgical procedure. Despite initial stabilization, she continued to experience life-threatening arrhythmias, prompting the implementation of simultaneous stellate ganglion block (SGB) and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) catheters. This combined approach successfully controlled the arrhythmias, allowing for subsequent surgical interventions. The article emphasizes the potential of SGB and TEA as a bridge to definitive therapies for refractory VS, highlighting the need for further research to solidify their role in clinical practice.
PubMed: 38854346
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59867 -
BMC Anesthesiology Jun 2024Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with or without rectus sheath block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is commonly used for pain control in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, significant pain persists, affecting patient recovery and sleep quality on the day of surgery. We compared the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided TAP block with or without rectus sheath (RS) block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the visual analog scale (VAS) scores.
METHODS
The study was registered before patient enrollment at the Clinical Research Information Service (registration number: KCT0006468, 19/08/2021). 88 American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status I-III patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups. RS-TAP group received right lateral and right subcostal TAP block, and RS block with 0.2% ropivacaine (30 mL); Bi-TAP group received bilateral and right subcostal TAP block with same amount of ropivacaine. The primary outcome was visual analogue scale (VAS) for 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the use of rescue analgesics, cumulative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption, patient satisfaction, sleep quality, and incidence of adverse events.
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in VAS score between two groups for 48 h postoperatively. We found no difference between the groups in any of the secondary outcomes: the use of rescue analgesics, consumption of IV-PCA, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, sleep quality, and the incidence of postoperative adverse events.
CONCLUSION
Both RS-TAP and Bi-TAP blocks provided clinically acceptable pain control in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, although there was no significant difference between two combination blocks in postoperative analgesia or sleep quality.
Topics: Humans; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Female; Male; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Nerve Block; Middle Aged; Pain, Postoperative; Abdominal Muscles; Ropivacaine; Adult; Anesthetics, Local; Pain Measurement; Rectus Abdominis; Patient Satisfaction; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Aged
PubMed: 38851689
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02590-x -
Military Medicine Jun 2024HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets) Syndrome is a rare but serious complication of pregnancy that can lead to disseminated intravascular...
HELLP (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low Platelets) Syndrome is a rare but serious complication of pregnancy that can lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation, pulmonary edema, respiratory failure, hepatic and renal injury, and death if not recognized and treated promptly. A 36-year-old nulligravid (G0) active duty Marine at 36 weeks and 1 day gestation with dichorionic diamniotic twins presented to triage for routine cervical examination found to have elevated blood pressures and symptomatic thrombocytopenia, with a suspected diagnosis of HELLP. A multidisciplinary decision was made by anesthesiology, obstetrics and gynecology, and pediatrics to deliver the twins to avoid any further complications. The twins were in cephalic presentation and the patient desired to attempt a vaginal delivery. Due to the patient's thrombocytopenia, neuraxial anesthesia (spinal and/or epidural) left the patient at a high risk of developing catastrophic complications such as an epidural hematoma, and the subsequent motor block/weakness would likely lessen the patient's ability to participate in active labor for a vaginal delivery. A Cesarean section under general anesthesia was also to be avoided as the patient's elevated risk of catastrophic hemorrhage would be worsened by volatile anesthetic agents which cause significant uterine vascular relaxation and reduced uterine muscular tone. Ultimately, the decision was made to provide analgesia through a remifentanil PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) for labor and a ketamine bolus for delivery. The mother delivered both twins vaginally in the operating room without perioperative complication. This case demonstrates the safety of alternate forms of anesthesia for delivery when neuraxial anesthesia is contraindicated.
PubMed: 38850222
DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usae296 -
Perioperative Medicine (London, England) Jun 2024The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a new analgesic method used in thoracic surgery. However, few studies have characterized their effects on perioperative opioid...
BACKGROUND
The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a new analgesic method used in thoracic surgery. However, few studies have characterized their effects on perioperative opioid consumption. We aimed to evaluate the effects of ESPB on perioperative opioid consumption in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).
METHODS
This was a randomized, observer-blinded clinical trial at a single-centre academic hospital. Eighty patients were scheduled for thoracoscopic segmentectomy or lobectomy by VATS for lung cancer. Forty participants were randomly assigned to ESPB or control group. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled postoperative analgesia. Perioperative opioid consumption, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and adverse events were recorded.
RESULTS
Intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and static/dynamic VAS scores were significantly lower in the early hours after VATS in the ESPB group (p < 0.05) than the control group. No significant differences were observed in adverse effects between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
ESPB reduced intraoperative opioid consumption and early postoperative pain in patients undergoing VATS. Our findings support the view that ESPB is a safe and highly effective option for regional analgesia for VATS.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
http://www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR1800019335.
PubMed: 38849882
DOI: 10.1186/s13741-024-00413-8 -
Trials Jun 2024Obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are particularly at risk of opioid-related side effects. To reduce patient exposure to opioids,...
The effect of pre-emptive oral pregabalin on opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with an analysis of intraoperative hemodynamic stability and quality of recovery: study protocol for a randomized, prospective, double-blind study.
BACKGROUND
Obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are particularly at risk of opioid-related side effects. To reduce patient exposure to opioids, multimodal analgesia, which involves the use of drugs of different classes, may be utilized. One of the drugs under consideration is pregabalin. Despite an opioid-sparing potential, few studies assess the role of pregabalin as an element of multimodal analgesia in LSG. Considering the limited number and inconsistent results of available studies, we decided to conduct a randomized, prospective study on the effect of preemptive pregabalin administration in obese patients on opioid consumption, pain scores, the incidence of opioid side effects, and hemodynamical stability.
METHODS
The study is designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial with double-blinding. Randomization will be performed in a block with a parallel 1:1 allocation. The intervention will involve receiving a pregabalin 150 mg capsule 1-2 h before the surgery, whereas the control group will receive an identically looking placebo. The primary outcome measure will be total oxycodone consumption in the first 24 h following surgery. Secondary outcome measures will be pain severity assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, postoperative sedation on the Ramsay scale, PONV impact scale, the incidence of desaturation episodes < 94%, and episodes of blurred vision at 1, 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), total fluid volume, and total ephedrine dose. Patient comfort will be additionally assessed using the QoR-40 questionnaire at discharge.
DISCUSSION
The study will explore the efficacy and safety of preemptive pregabalin in a dose of 150 mg as a co-analgesic used in multimodal analgesia for LSG. As studies on opioid-sparing regimes concern the safety of obese patients, we aim to contribute objective data with a relatively large study sample size. The result of the present clinical trial may support the reassessment of recommendations to use pregabalin in the studied population.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05804591. Registered on 07.04.2023.
Topics: Humans; Pregabalin; Double-Blind Method; Prospective Studies; Analgesics, Opioid; Gastrectomy; Pain, Postoperative; Laparoscopy; Hemodynamics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Pain Measurement; Administration, Oral; Analgesics; Middle Aged; Male; Time Factors; Female; Young Adult; Recovery of Function; Oxycodone
PubMed: 38849875
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08225-3 -
Cureus May 2024Preoperative anxiety can negatively impact patient outcomes by influencing the intraoperative requirements for anesthetics and analgesics, increasing postoperative pain...
INTRODUCTION
Preoperative anxiety can negatively impact patient outcomes by influencing the intraoperative requirements for anesthetics and analgesics, increasing postoperative pain intensity, and augmenting the need for analgesia. Moreover, it may contribute to higher rates of postoperative morbidity and mortality following certain types of surgery. This study investigates the anxiolytic and sedative properties of sublingual melatonin as a premedication agent in young females undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
METHODS
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in Nasiriyah, Iraq. Eighty females were included, 40 in each group, based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Premedication was administered in the morning, 60 minutes before the procedure. In the melatonin group (M), patients received 10 mg of sublingual melatonin, while the placebo group (P) received placebo premedication. Anxiety and sedation levels were evaluated three times: before taking premedication, five minutes before the insertion of the spinal needle, and one hour postoperatively, using the visual analog scale and Richmond Sedation Scale.
RESULTS
The results show a highly significant P-value regarding anxiety levels between the M Group and P Group (p-value < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the median sedation scores between the studied groups at pre-spinal insertion and postoperatively (p-value < 0.001). The mean heart rate in the M Group was significantly lower than in the P Group (p-value = 0.0019). Significant differences were noted in systolic and diastolic blood pressures between the two groups, measured five minutes before and after spinal needle insertion (p-value < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
These findings contribute to understanding the impact of sublingual melatonin as an anxiolytic and sedative premedication agent on patients undergoing elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia. Further research is warranted to fully elucidate the benefits and implications of melatonin administration in such procedures.
PubMed: 38841008
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59710 -
Journal of the College of Physicians... Jun 2024To investigate the efficacy of adding 0.5 micrograms/kg of dexmedetomidine to 0.2% ropivacaine in erector spinae plane block in terms of 24-hour opioid consumption after... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the efficacy of adding 0.5 micrograms/kg of dexmedetomidine to 0.2% ropivacaine in erector spinae plane block in terms of 24-hour opioid consumption after lumbar spine surgeries.
STUDY DESIGN
A randomised controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: The Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 30th November 2022 to 30th March 2023.
METHODOLOGY
Patients aged between 18-70 years, ASA 1-3 who were booked to undergo lumbar spine surgeries under general anaesthesia were inducted. Patients in the intervention group received erector spinae plane block (ESPB). Exclusion criteria were patient refusal, inability to give consent, patients with contraindications to regional anaesthesia, known allergy to study medications, inability to use patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), psychiatric disorders or patients using any psychiatric medications. The primary outcome measure of the study was 24-hour opioid consumption.
RESULTS
The numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores were significantly decreased in the ESPB-D group at 30 minutes (p = 0.042), at 1 hour (p = 0.018), at 2 hours (p = 0.044), at 12 hours (p = 0.039), at 18 hours (p = 0.011), and at 24 hours (p = 0.020). Intraoperative use of remifentanil was also significantly lower in the ESPB-D group (p <0.01). ESPB using dexmedetomidine also reduced opioid consumption over a period of 24 hours (p <0.01). Median patient satisfaction score and median ease of mobility were also significantly better in the ESPB-D group.
CONCLUSION
Addition of dexmedetomidine in erector spinae plane block reduced pain scores and intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption after lumbar spine surgery.
KEY WORDS
Dexmedetomidine, Erector spinae plane block, Lumbar spine surgery, Opioid consumption, Pain control.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; Pain, Postoperative; Analgesics, Opioid; Nerve Block; Middle Aged; Female; Male; Adult; Lumbar Vertebrae; Ropivacaine; Adolescent; Pain Measurement; Young Adult; Aged; Saudi Arabia; Anesthetics, Local; Paraspinal Muscles
PubMed: 38840342
DOI: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.06.636 -
Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Jun 2024Opioid administration has the benefit of providing perioperative analgesia but is also associated with adverse effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) may reduce...
INTRODUCTION
Opioid administration has the benefit of providing perioperative analgesia but is also associated with adverse effects. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) may reduce postoperative opioid consumption and adverse effects after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. In this randomized controlled study, we hypothesized that an opioid-free anesthetic using lidocaine, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine would result in a clinically significant reduction in 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption when compared with an opioid-inclusive technique.
METHODS
Subjects presenting for laparoscopic or robotic bariatric surgery were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either standard opioid-inclusive anesthesia (group A: control) or OFA (group B: OFA). The primary outcome was opioid consumption in the first 24 hours postoperatively in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain scores, patient-reported incidence of opioid-related adverse effects, hospital length of stay, patient satisfaction, and ongoing opioid use at 1 and 3 months after hospital discharge.
RESULTS
181 subjects, 86 from the control group and 95 from the OFA group, completed the study per protocol. Analysis of the primary outcome showed no significant difference in total opioid consumption at 24 hours between the two treatment groups (control: 52 OMEs vs OFA: 55 OMEs, p=0.49). No secondary outcomes showed statistically significant differences between groups.
CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates that an OFA protocol using dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and lidocaine for laparoscopic or robotic bariatric surgery was not associated with a reduction in 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption when compared with an opioid-inclusive technique using fentanyl.
PubMed: 38839427
DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105632