-
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Apr 2024The study aimed to evaluate the agreement of prescribed drug dosages with renal dosing recommendations and describe adverse drug events (ADEs) contributing to hospital...
BACKGROUND
The study aimed to evaluate the agreement of prescribed drug dosages with renal dosing recommendations and describe adverse drug events (ADEs) contributing to hospital admissions of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
METHODS
This cross-sectional study focused on CKD patients admitted to University Hospital Hradec Králové, with an estimated glomerular filtration rate below 60 ml/min. The necessity for renal dosage adjustments was determined using the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). For medications requiring renal dosage adjustment according to SmPC, agreement between the prescribed and recommended renal dosage was assessed. ADEs were adjudicated using the OPERAM drug-related hospital admissions adjudication guide.
RESULTS
Of 375 CKD patients, 112 (30%, 95% CI 25-34) were prescribed drug dosages in disagreement with SmPC renal dosage recommendations. Perindopril, metformin, and ramipril were most frequently dosed in disagreement with SmPC. ADE-related hospital admissions occurred in 20% (95% CI 16-24) of CKD patients.
CONCLUSION
CKD patients are often prescribed medication dosages in disagreement with SmPC renal dosing recommendations. Besides explicit factors, treatment goals, feasibility of monitoring and alternative treatment must be weighed when assessing drug and dosage appropriateness. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most frequent ADE that contributed to hospital admissions of CKD patients.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Kidney; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hospitals
PubMed: 38332533
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2295980 -
European Heart Journal Apr 2024Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) is an important predictor of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. The long-term effect of a period of blood pressure...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (BPV) is an important predictor of cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. The long-term effect of a period of blood pressure (BP) control, but with differential BPV, is uncertain. Morbidity and mortality follow-up of UK participants in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure-Lowering Arm has been extended for up to 21 years to determine the CV impact of mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) control and BPV during the trial, and amongst those allocated to amlodipine- and atenolol-based treatment.
METHODS
Eight thousand five hundred and eighty hypertensive participants (4305 assigned to amlodipine ± perindopril-based and 4275 to atenolol ± diuretic-based treatment during the in-trial period (median 5.5 years) were followed for up to 21 years (median 17.4 years), using linked hospital and mortality records. A subgroup of participants (n = 2156) was followed up 6 years after the trial closure with a self-administered questionnaire and a clinic visit. In-trial mean SBP and standard deviation of visit-to-visit SBP as a measure of BPV, were measured using >100 000 BP measurements. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk [hazard ratios (HRs)], associated with (i) mean with SBP and BPV during the in-trial period, for the CV endpoints occurring after the end of the trial and (ii) randomly assigned treatment to events following randomization, for the first occurrence of pre-specified CV outcomes.
RESULTS
Using BP data from the in-trial period, in the post-trial period, although mean SBP was a predictor of CV outcomes {HR per 10 mmHg, 1.14 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.17], P < .001}, systolic BPV independent of mean SBP was a strong predictor of CV events [HR per 5 mmHg 1.22 (95% CI 1.18-1.26), P < .001] and predicted events even in participants with well-controlled BP. During 21-year follow-up, those on amlodipine-based compared with atenolol-based in-trial treatment had significantly reduced risk of stroke [HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.93), P = .003], total CV events [HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.88-0.98), P = .008], total coronary events [HR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.99), P = .024], and atrial fibrillation [HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.83-0.99), P = .030], with weaker evidence of a difference in CV mortality [HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-1.01), P = .073]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal coronary heart disease, heart failure, and all-cause mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
Systolic BPV is a strong predictor of CV outcome, even in those with controlled SBP. The long-term benefits of amlodipine-based treatment compared with atenolol-based treatment in reducing CV events appear to be primarily mediated by an effect on systolic BPV during the trial period.
Topics: Humans; Blood Pressure; Atenolol; Antihypertensive Agents; Hypertension; Amlodipine; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38291599
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad814 -
Georgian Medical News Nov 2023The idea of drug-induced/exogenic Nitrosogenesis is driven by the possibility of prolonged exposure of the human body to the influence of nitrosamines within the drug...
MELANOMA AND DYSPLASTIC NEVI DEVELOPMENT AFTER RANITIDINE/RILMENIDINE/МOXONIDINE, LERCANIDIPINE, ROSUVASTATIN AND VERAPAMIL/TRANDOLAPRIL - NEW DATA/CASE SERIES. THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF NITROSAMINE/NDSRIS CONTAMINATION IN POLYMEDICATION AS SUBSTANTIAL SKIN CANCER TRIGGERING FACTOR.
The idea of drug-induced/exogenic Nitrosogenesis is driven by the possibility of prolonged exposure of the human body to the influence of nitrosamines within the drug intake - substances or contaminants that have been proven to be carcinogenic or mutagenic one.Until recently, there was a complete lack of data in the scientific literature on the relationship between cancer, polymedication and polycontamination with nitrosamines. In the last decade, melanoma has been described repeatedly in the medical literature as a possible side-effect within the intake of possibly with nitrosamines contaminated medications such as: Valsartan, Hydrochlorothiazide, Amlodipine, Nebivolol, Bisoprolol and Perindopril. However, the contribution of the currently presented new data (5 new patients) is also due to the establishment of the possible pathogenetic role (with respect to melanoma) of several completely new drugs, previously unknown to the scientific community (potentially/actually contaminated with carcinogens/nitrosamines), such as: Ranitidine, Rosuvastatin, Lercanidipine, Rilmenidine, Trandolapril, Moxonidine and Verapamil.The leading and connecting link in shared new and old drug combinations of heterogeneous drug classes (polymedication) and melanoma development and progression remains again one and the same: the possible availability of nitroso component in the frame of exogenous nitrosogenesis according to the official FDA lists of 2023.The number of drugs shared as contaminated with nitrosamines after whose intake melanomas occur is increasing. Nitrosogenesis remains a new beginning, a new understanding and new interpretation of the carcinogenesis concerning melanoma, but probably also of cancer in general. Its further elucidation looks more than promising and is yet to come. More than worrying at the moment remains the fact that the scientific community has to clarify if: 1) peak concentrations of nitrosamines or NDSRIs within the framework of monomedication or 2) normal concentrations within the polymedication (catalogued in the list of FDA/ 2023 as potentially contaminated with hypothetical carcinogens), could hide relatively short-term risk of the development of real tumors: cutaneous melanomas and/or their precursor lesions. The validation of the concept of Nitrosogenesis and its relationship to Сarcinogenesis, is achieved in practice on the basis of the following facts: that it is the occurrence of the same monomorphic clinical pattern (melanoma/dysplastic nevi), developing after the intake of drugs with different mechanism of action, contaminated with nitrosamines/NDSRIs. The unifying link between the intake of certain drugs and the development of certain tumours remains the presence of nitrosamines. Ingredients that are present in drug preparations, identified as availability and as carcinogenic potency, but not yet reflected in packaging or prescriptions. The question remains: why?
Topics: Humans; Melanoma; Rosuvastatin Calcium; Ranitidine; Rilmenidine; Nitrosamines; Polypharmacy; Dysplastic Nevus Syndrome; Skin Neoplasms; Carcinogens; Carcinogenesis; Dihydropyridines; Imidazoles; Indoles
PubMed: 38236117
DOI: No ID Found -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... Feb 2024Telmisartan is an antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor used in the management of hypertension (alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. It... (Review)
Review
Telmisartan is an antagonist of the angiotensin II receptor used in the management of hypertension (alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. It belongs to the drug class of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Among drugs of this class, telmisartan shows particular pharmacologic properties, including a longer half-life than any other angiotensin II receptor blockers that bring higher and persistent antihypertensive activity. In hypertensive patients, telmisartan has superior efficacy than other antihypertensive drugs (losartan, valsartan, ramipril, atenolol, and perindopril) in controlling blood pressure, especially towards the end of the dosing interval. Telmisartan has a partial PPARγ-agonistic effect whilst does not have the safety concerns of full agonists of PPARγ receptors (thiazolidinediones). Moreover, telmisartan has an agonist activity on PPARα and PPARδ receptors and modulates the adipokine levels. Thus, telmisartan could be considered as a suitable alternative option, with multi-benefit for all components of metabolic syndrome including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hyperlipidemia. This review will highlight the role of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome and the main mechanisms of action of telmisartan are discussed and summarized. Many studies have demonstrated the useful properties of telmisartan in the prevention and improving of metabolic syndrome and this well-tolerated drug can be greatly proposed in the treatment of different components of metabolic syndrome. However, larger and long-duration studies are needed to confirm these findings in long-term observational studies and prospective trials and to determine the optimum dose of telmisartan in metabolic syndrome.
Topics: Humans; Telmisartan; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Metabolic Syndrome; PPAR gamma; Prospective Studies; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles; Hypertension; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Benzoates
PubMed: 38228033
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116169 -
Hospital Pharmacy Feb 2024
PubMed: 38223870
DOI: 10.1177/00185787231188919 -
Scientific Reports Jan 2024Given possible involvement of the central and peripheral angiotensin system in pain processing, we conducted clinical and preclinical studies to test whether...
Given possible involvement of the central and peripheral angiotensin system in pain processing, we conducted clinical and preclinical studies to test whether pharmacological inhibition of the angiotensin system would prevent diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) accompanying type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In the preclinical study, the nociceptive sensitivity was determined in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice, a T2DM model. A clinical retrospective cohort study was conducted, using the medical records of T2DM patients receiving antihypertensives at three hospitals for nearly a decade. In the ob/ob mice, daily treatment with perindopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), or telmisartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), but not amlodipine, an L-type calcium channel blocker (CaB), significantly inhibited DPN development without affecting the hyperglycemia. In the clinical study, the enrolled 7464 patients were divided into three groups receiving ACEIs, ARBs and the others (non-ACEI, non-ARB antihypertensives). Bonferroni's test indicated significantly later DPN development in the ARB and ACEI groups than the others group. The multivariate Cox proportional analysis detected significant negative association of the prescription of ACEIs or ARBs and β-blockers, but not CaBs or diuretics, with DPN development. Thus, our study suggests that pharmacological inhibition of the angiotensin system is beneficial to prevent DPN accompanying T2DM.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Humans; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Antihypertensive Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Retrospective Studies; Antiviral Agents
PubMed: 38200077
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51572-z -
European Journal of Pharmacology Mar 2024The angiotensin (Ang)-(1-12)/Ang II pathway contributes to cardiac pathology. However, its involvement in the development of peripheral endothelial dysfunction...
The angiotensin (Ang)-(1-12)/Ang II pathway contributes to cardiac pathology. However, its involvement in the development of peripheral endothelial dysfunction associated with heart failure (HF) remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to characterise the effect of exogenous Ang-(1-12) and its conversion to Ang II on endothelial function using the murine model of HF (Tgαq*44 mice), focusing on the role of chymase and vascular-derived thromboxane A (TXA). Ex vivo myographic assessments of isolated aorta showed impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in late-stage HF in 12-month-old Tgαq*44 mice. However, endothelium-dependent vasodilation was fully preserved in the early stage of HF in 4-month-old Tgαq*44 mice and 4- and 12-month-old FVB control mice. Ang-(1-12) impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in 4- and 12-month-old Tgαq*44 mice, that was associated with increased Ang II production. The chymase inhibitor chymostatin did not inhibit this response. Interestingly, TXA production reflected by TXB measurement was upregulated in response to Ang-(1-12) and Ang II in aortic rings isolated from 12-month-old Tgαq*44 mice but not from 4-month-old Tgαq*44 mice or age-matched FVB mice. Furthermore, in vivo magnetic resonance imaging showed that Ang-(1-12) impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the aorta of Tgαq*44 mice and FVB mice. However, this response was inhibited by angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor; perindopril, angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT) antagonist; losartan and TXA receptor (TP) antagonist-picotamide in 12-month-old-Tgαq*44 mice only. In conclusion, the chymase-independent vascular Ang-(1-12)/Ang II pathway and subsequent TXA overactivity contribute to systemic endothelial dysfunction in the late stage of HF in Tgαq*44 mice. Therefore, the vascular TXA receptor represents a pharmacotherapeutic target to improve peripheral endothelial dysfunction in chronic HF.
Topics: Animals; Mice; Angiotensin I; Angiotensin II; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Chymases; Disease Models, Animal; Heart Failure; Mice, Inbred Strains; Vascular Diseases
PubMed: 38158114
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2023.176296 -
Georgian Medical News Oct 2023Drug-induced Nitrosogenesis/Carcinogenesis turns out to be a ubiquitous, pervasive, large-scale, poorly controllable concept for the academic community, which underlies...
METASTATIC NODULAR MELANOMA DEVELOPING ON NEVUS SPILUS DURING INTAKE OF BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL/NEBIVOLOL) AND ACE INHIBITORS (PERINDOPRIL). POTENTIAL LINKS TО THE DRUG RELATED NITROSOGENESIS/CARCINOGENESIS, DUNNING-KRUGER EFFECT AND GENETIC WEAPONS OF THE NEW GENERATION.
Drug-induced Nitrosogenesis/Carcinogenesis turns out to be a ubiquitous, pervasive, large-scale, poorly controllable concept for the academic community, which underlies the long-term, permanent modification of the human genome by contact with nitrosamines/NDSRIs, which ultimately leads to the generation of diverse cancers, but also melanoma in particular. The discovery of a (currently) unclassifiable number of nitroso derivatives/genome modifiers in the most commonly distributed drugs worldwide (in about 300 preparations according to the FDA/includes beta blockers/bisoprolol/nebivolol and ACE inhibitors/perindopril), their forced tolerability, attributed as a necessity or lack of alternative also to the present (but also to future periods), and their proven carcinogenicity (already 70 years ago), suggest a kind of creepy form of experiment to which public health is subjected worldwide. The creation of a universal nitroso-comfort of pharmaceutical companies and the regulation of a permanent intake of carcinogens in drugs for years to come, but also decades back, suggest possible cartel agreements between the regulation/distribution unit and that of production cycles. These "agreements" are becoming increasingly evident and in all likelihood position nitrosogenesis from a until recently unknown element, to a pathogenetic factor of paramount importance. Melanoma could be viewed precisely as the controlled end gene-modified product of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis, proven to be a locoregional (but not only) phenomenon hundreds if not thousands of times. The dilemma stays: Are the nitrosamines in drugs genetic weapons, ethnic bioweapons for silent war ? The nitrosogenesis concerning melanoma leads to the logical conclusion that cancer is in fact a largely controlled set event or, according to others, a forced necessity of evolutionary globalization processes to purge the population in certain regions. In favor of this statement indicative are namely: 1) lack of regulatory control/results of such conducted, 2) complete information veil for the end user regarding contamination with carcinogens/nitrosamines in certain batches or all batches of drugs, 3) misinformation and lack of transparency regarding the concept of nitrosogenesis also for the academic community, as well as 4) the impunity to pharmaceutical conglomerates after criminal negligence/controlled criminogenicity proven thousands of times by the FDA/EMA leading to regulatory controlled drug mediated genocide of the human population in certain areas on a daily basis. And most important of all: 5) the lack of refusal to eliminate these drugs, i.e. - the imposition of forced tolerance at any cost. It is extremely unfortunate that the mentioned and identified grotesque/situation, its tolerance on a global scale, lead to a misjudgement of the significance of real tumor inducers within the global health map//statistics as well as melanoma. The focus of prevention is being displaced, while the incidence of cancer in general and that of melanoma is skyrocketing. Nitrosamines could be defined as the newest, modern, until recently invisible and unknown, but -controllable form of genetic weapon to modify the human genome. Because of these very facts, the likelihood that clinicians and the academic community are in the frozen and permanent state of the Dunning-Kruger effect is very real. Certain globalization regulatory elements create problems and assignments that must be solved ˝competently˝ by incompetent, fully regulatable compartments. As their state of competence depends again and entirely on ˝their incompetence˝. Until now. After the formalization of the concept of Nitrosogenesis (as a form of genetic weapon) and melanoma for example, but not only, it remains to be seen whether universal incompetence will become a guarantee of competence and the survival. Or- will it remain again at the level of globalized, criminally conditioned, appointed and regulated from above "competent incompetence". The dilemmas to regulators and manufacturers remain open : Is it competent to take drugs that contain carcinogens/nitrosamines? Is it competent for this issue to continue for decades with impunity? Is it competent for regulators not to inform consumers about the presence of carcinogens/genome modifiers in medicines for decades? Is it competent for certain regions to be affected by nitrosamine contamination and not others? Is it competent not to reflect this in regional and global health bulletins on side effects? Is it competent to make thousands of times the profits from the modified genetic map business, regulated and legally initiated through the intake of carcinogens? Is it competent to have the concentration of carcinogens within polymedication exceeding many times the daily allowable doses of carcinogens and have no solution for this? Is it competent, when the intake of nitrosamines in medicines is associated with the generation of melanomas and heterogeneous cancers- to have no alternative to this or when one is available- to conceal it skillfully? Is it competent to determine carcinogenic activity based on mutagenic tests? Is it competent to be polyincompetent within a framework of mass (in)competence? We report systemically administered drugs for the treatment of high blood pressure from the group of beta blockers (bisoprolol/nebivolol) and ACE inhibitors (perindopril) that have been identified by regulators in the face of FDA as hypothetically contaminated with nitrosamines/NDSRIs with a carcinogenic potency between 4 and 5, respectively. Within this cumulative intake, (which according to the regulators was not at risk of developing cancerous forms), similar to other cases in the world literature, the patient developed a relatively short-term, metastatic nevus spilus-based nodular melanoma. The paper analyses not only the role of nitrosogenesis, but also that of two pregnancies and painful sunburns as potential cofactors for melanoma genesis. Academic attention is drawn to the potential impact of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis/carcinogenesis. Nitrosamines in the framework of polycontamination and polymedication could also be identified as one of the most effective, until recently unknown, modern generation genetic weapons for modifying the human genome and controlling cancer. Moreover, they could be controllably applied and skillfully targeted. At least until now. The officialization of carcinogens in more than 250 of the most common drugs and the clinico-pathological correlations concerning the development of cancer/melanoma in poorly controlled geographical regions represent a kind of in vivo prospective study to determine precisely the real carcinogenic role of nitrosamines to date.
Topics: Humans; Melanoma; Perindopril; Bisoprolol; Nebivolol; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Prospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Carcinogens; Nitrosamines; Carcinogenesis; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Nevus
PubMed: 38096536
DOI: No ID Found -
Kardiologiia Dec 2023The 2022 draft Russian guidelines on arterial hypertension recommend initiation of antihypertensive therapy with a combination of drugs in most patients with blood...
The 2022 draft Russian guidelines on arterial hypertension recommend initiation of antihypertensive therapy with a combination of drugs in most patients with blood pressure above 150 / 90 mm Hg and / or in the presence of high-risk criteria. In 2021, the results of a 12-year analysis of the Brisighella Heart Study (BHS) were published. The aim of this study was to compare the use of different triple antihypertensive drug combinations in an Italian cohort of patients in real-life clinical practice. Combination antihypertensive therapy with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, amlodipine, and thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics provides a better blood pressure control compared to other antihypertensive drug combinations. The use of the triple combination of amlodipine/indapamide/perindopril is associated with a better metabolic profile than any other considered combination of antihypertensive drugs and a more pronounced organ-protective effect.
Topics: Humans; Antihypertensive Agents; Hypertension; Perindopril; Amlodipine; Indapamide; Blood Pressure; Drug Combinations; Thiazides
PubMed: 38088116
DOI: 10.18087/cardio.2023.11.n2582 -
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology Jan 2024Although a growing number of observational studies suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) intake may be a risk factor for psoriasis, evidence is...
BACKGROUND
Although a growing number of observational studies suggest that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) intake may be a risk factor for psoriasis, evidence is still insufficient to draw definitive conclusions.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Drug-targeted Mendelian randomization (DTMR) was used to analyze the causality between genetic proxied ACEIs and psoriasis. Furthermore, we performed a disproportionality analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database to identify more suspicious subclasses of ACEIs.
RESULTS
Using two kinds of genetic proxy instruments, the present DTMR research identified genetic proxied ACEIs as risk factors for psoriasis. Furthermore, our disproportionality analysis revealed that ramipril, trandolapril, perindopril, lisinopril, and enalapril were associated with the risk of psoriasis, which validates and refines the findings of the DTMR.
CONCLUSIONS
Our integrative study verified that ACEIs, especially ramipril, trandolapril, perindopril, lisinopril, and enalapril, tended to increase the risk of psoriasis statistically.
Topics: Humans; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Ramipril; Lisinopril; Perindopril; Pharmacovigilance; Mendelian Randomization Analysis; Enalapril; Psoriasis
PubMed: 38078460
DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2292605