-
Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia Y... Nov 2023Angioedema is a potentially life-threatening condition due to the risk of airway compromise leading to deterioration of respiratory function, hypoxia, and ultimately,...
Angioedema is a potentially life-threatening condition due to the risk of airway compromise leading to deterioration of respiratory function, hypoxia, and ultimately, cardiopulmonary arrest. It can be either unprovoked or triggered by pharmaceutical agents, emotional or physiologic factors, upper airway trauma, or surgical stress. A 46-year-old man previously prescribed perindopril developed angioedema of the tongue 4 h after being discharged from the Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU). A multidisciplinary team was called and they outlined an airway management strategy to use in the event of worsening. The strategy consisted of either fiberoptic intubation by an anesthesiologist or surgical tracheostomy performed by the surgical team, both performed with the patient awake and in spontaneous ventilation. The aim of this case report is to raise awareness that angioedema is a potentially life-threatening condition. For optimal management, it is important to prepare in advance a detailed airway management strategy to be implemented by a multidisciplinary team.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angioedema; Airway Management; Tongue
PubMed: 37678466
DOI: 10.1016/j.redare.2022.10.011 -
Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology... Jun 2023Thrombotic events are highly prevalent in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in patients presenting with risk factors of adverse outcomes such as obesity....
Thrombotic events are highly prevalent in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), especially in patients presenting with risk factors of adverse outcomes such as obesity. Recently, the associations between the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) pathway and thrombosis have been reported. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used cardiovascular pharmacologic agents that upregulate ACE2 levels. An observation of the alterations in pro-coagulation factors after exposure to ACEIs and ARBs may provide valuable insight into the thrombosis mechanism and how it may relate to ACE2. This study use adipose tissue harvested from an obese male donor was isolated and exposed to perindopril, losartan, and ACE2 recombinant as binding assay, following exposure with 10 nm of SARS-CoV-2 S1 spike protein. After 48 hours, tissue factor (TF) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) as pro-coagulation factors as well as ACE2 levels and binding evaluated. The results shows TF level was significantly reduced in Perindopril group compared to control (4.834; p=0.005), while a non-significant reduction was observed in Losartan group (5.624; p=0.111). However, Losartan group showed a better reduction of PAI-1 levels (2.633; p≤0.001) than Perindopril group (3.484; p=0.001). These findings were consistent with the observations in ACE2 recombinant group, suggesting that both drugs lowered the bindings of ACE2 and SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins. This study indicated that both perindopril and losartan may attenuate pro-coagulation factors in human adipocytes exposed to SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins, and therefore showcased a potential role of ACE2 in the mechanism of COVID-19-related thrombosis. Further investigation in non-COVID-19 populations should commence and may be of value to expanding this potential in general cardiovascular diseases.
Topics: Humans; Male; Perindopril; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus; Losartan; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Blood Coagulation Factors; Adipocytes; Thromboplastin; Cardiovascular Agents; Obesity
PubMed: 37661180
DOI: 10.26402/jpp.2023.3.03 -
European Journal of Internal Medicine Jan 2024Arterial hypertension is the most common cardiovascular comorbidity in atrial fibrillation (AF). Few studies investigated management strategies of hypertension in AF.
BACKGROUND
Arterial hypertension is the most common cardiovascular comorbidity in atrial fibrillation (AF). Few studies investigated management strategies of hypertension in AF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We included 5769 AF patients on oral anticoagulants from the nationwide ongoing Italian START registry. We investigated the prescription of antihypertensive drugs and mortality risk. Subgroup analyses according to sex and major cardiovascular comorbidities were performed.
RESULTS
Mean age was 80.8 years, 46.1% were women; 80.3% of patients were hypertensive. Furosemide (30.1%) was the most frequent diuretic followed by hydrochlorothiazide (15.4%) and potassium canrenoate (7.9%). 61.1% received β-blockers: 34.2% bisoprolol, 6.2% atenolol. Additionally, 36.9% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I): ramipril (20.9%), enalapril (5.3%) and perindopril (2.8%); 31.7% were on angiotensin receptors blockers (ARBs): valsartan (7.6%) and irbesartan (6.4%). Amlodipine and lercanidipine were prescribed in 14.0% and 2.3%, respectively. ACE-I (p < 0.001), α-blockers (p = 0.020) and Dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers (p = 0.004) were more common in men, while ARBs (p = 0.008), thiazide diuretics (p < 0.001) and β-blockers (p < 0.001) in women. During 22.61 ± 17.1 months, 512 patients died. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that ACE-I (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.758, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.612-0.940, p = 0.012) and ARBs (HR 0.623, 95%CI 0.487-0.796, p < 0.001) inversely associated with mortality. ACE-I/ARBs inversely associated with mortality in both sexes and in patients with diabetes. This associastion was evident for ACE-I in patients with previous cardiovascular disease, and for ARBs in HF.
CONCLUSION
A lower mortality risk was found in AF patients on ACE-I/ARBs. Different prescription patterns of antihypertensive drugs between men and women do exist.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Renin-Angiotensin System; Atrial Fibrillation; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Hypertension; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
PubMed: 37648584
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.08.019 -
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology... 2023Ventricular remodeling is a mal-adaptive process. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and sacubitril/valsartan have been shown to reverse remodeling in mostly...
Ventricular remodeling is a mal-adaptive process. Both angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and sacubitril/valsartan have been shown to reverse remodeling in mostly uncontrolled observational studies. There is a lack of head-to-head studies. This cohort study compares the remodeling effects of angiotensin receptor blockers combined with a neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and perindopril in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients between January 2017 and December 2020. Inclusion criteria: (i) age > 18 years, (ii) recent diagnosis of de-novo HFrEF (EF < 40%), (iii) baseline echocardiography performed not more than 2 months prior to treatment onset, and (iv) follow-up echocardiography performed not earlier than 6 months and not later than 18 months posttreatment onset. No prior treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors was permitted in the ARNI group. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) were analyzed. A two-way repeated measure ANOVA (for normally distributed) and generalized estimating equation test for nonnormally distributed interval dependent variables. Mean comparison between and within groups was performed using the Bonferroni test. Following an average treatment period of 9 months, LVEF improved from 24.9% to 36.4% for ARNI and from 28.7% to 40.5% for perindopril, increments of 11.5% and 11.8% resp. (Bonferroni test [ ≤ .05]). LVEDV was reduced by 8.4 mL and 3.2 mL, and LVESV by 17.9 mL and 10.8 mL for ARNI and perindopril resp. Only the reduction of LVESV for ARNI was statistically significant ( = .007). Both ARNI and perindopril yielded a significant improvement in the LVEF within 9 months. The remodeling effect of ARNI seems stronger because of the greater improvements in left ventricular volumes.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Heart Failure; Stroke Volume; Cohort Studies; Perindopril; Ventricular Function, Left; Tetrazoles; Treatment Outcome; Valsartan; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Drug Combinations
PubMed: 37635324
DOI: 10.1177/10742484231195019 -
Journal of Hypertension Nov 2023Cough caused by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) limits their clinical application and cardiovascular benefits. This randomized trial investigated... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE
Cough caused by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) limits their clinical application and cardiovascular benefits. This randomized trial investigated whether genotype-guided perindopril use could reduce drug-related cough in 20 to 79-year-old individuals with hypertension.
METHODS
After screening 120 patients and randomization, 68 were assigned to genotyping ( n = 41) and control ( n = 27) groups. NELL1 p.Arg382Trp (rs8176786) and intron (rs10766756) genotype information was used to subdivide the genotyping group into high-risk and low-risk subgroups with at least one or no risk alleles for ACEI-related cough, respectively. The high-risk subgroup received candesartan (8 mg/day) for 6 weeks, whereas the low-risk subgroup received perindopril (4 mg/day). The control group, which was not genotyped, received perindopril (4 mg/day). The primary outcome variables were cough and moderate/severe cough; the secondary outcome variable was any adverse event.
RESULTS
During the 6-week period, the risk of cough was lower in the genotyping group than in the control group [five (12.2%) and nine (33.3%) participants, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.25; log-rank P = 0.017]. The moderate/severe cough risk was also lower in the genotyping group [one (2.4%) and five (18.5%) participants, respectively; hazard ratio: 0.12; log-rank P = 0.025]. Differences in cough (hazard ratio: 0.56; log-rank P = 0.32) and moderate/severe cough risk (hazard ratio: 0.26; log-rank P = 0.19) between the low-risk and control groups were not significant. The risk of total adverse events was similar between any two groups.
CONCLUSION
Cough risk was lower during genotype-guided treatment than during conventional treatment. These results support the utility of NELL1 variant data in clinical decision making to personalize renin-angiotensin system blocker therapy use.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05535595 (retrospectively registered at September 7, 2022).
Topics: Humans; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Perindopril; Cough; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Hypertension; Genotype
PubMed: 37602458
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003536 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Aug 2023Wunderlich syndrome is a rare and life-threatening condition that is characterized by spontaneous renal hemorrhage into the subcapsular and perinephric regions. This...
UNLABELLED
Wunderlich syndrome is a rare and life-threatening condition that is characterized by spontaneous renal hemorrhage into the subcapsular and perinephric regions. This case report describes the diagnosis and management of bilateral Wunderlich syndrome during pregnancy, resulting in Page kidney.
CASE PRESENTATION
The patient presented with complaints of left flank pain and breathlessness. After stabilization, an emergency lower cesarean delivery was performed, and a percutaneous drainage procedure was carried out to alleviate the compression on the left kidney. The patient was treated with blood transfusion, methyldopa, and perindopril. Follow-up examinations performed 3 months later revealed a significant decrease in fluid volume surrounding the left kidney.
CLINICAL DISCUSSION
Lenk's triad provides the primary description of the classical manifestations of this syndrome. Some instances have been connected to the Page kidney phenomenon. The relationship between pregnancy and Wunderlich syndrome has not been extensively studied, primarily because the symptoms can resemble other complications related to pregnancy. Due to the scarcity of evidence in the literature, there is no definitive guideline for managing Wunderlich syndrome during pregnancy. Consequently, each patient is treated on an individual basis. Conservative treatment is recommended once malignancy has been ruled out.
CONCLUSION
The case highlights the importance of considering Wunderlich syndrome as a differential diagnosis in pregnant patients with abdominal or flank pain, a palpable mass, and hypovolemia. Furthermore, the case illustrates the successful management of Wunderlich syndrome during pregnancy.
PubMed: 37554856
DOI: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001062 -
Georgian Medical News Jun 2023The Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is a newly introduced concept in medical science, the significance of which is yet to be the subject of detailed analyses and...
NITROSOGENESIS OF SKIN CANCER: THE NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION IN THE CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS (AMLODIPINE), BETA BLOCKERS (BISOPROLOL), SARTANS (VALSARTAN/LOSARTAN), ACE INHIBITORS (PERINDOPRIL/ENALAPRIL), TRICYCLIC ANTIDEPRESSANTS (MELITRACEN), SSRIS (PAROXETINE), SNRIS (VENLAFAXINE) AND METFORMIN:...
The Nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is a newly introduced concept in medical science, the significance of which is yet to be the subject of detailed analyses and discussions. Contamination of the most commonly used drugs for systemic treatment worldwide (such as Angiotensin receptor II blockers/ARBs, ACE inhibitors, Beta blockers, Thiazide diuretics, Metformin, Ranitidine, Nizatidine, tricyclic antidepressants, anticoagulants/dabigatran, Rifampicin, calcium channel blockers, SSRIs/ selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, Varenicline) is already a fact and is more than worrying but also indicative. It is "this relationship" that has been repeatedly described in the medical literature (initially) as an association, and subsequently now increasingly as a causal relationship, a pathogenetic relationship. Observational data from clinicians over the past year increasingly speak in favour of a pathogenetic link and associate every single drug declared as contaminated with the development of heterogeneous forms of skin cancer gradually and surely. New drugs are added monthly that have not yet been declared as actually/potentially contaminated but are probably known to regulatory authorities or are in the process of being clarified. In parallel, the number of nitrosamines identified as contaminants in medicines is growing. This should not be surprising to anyone: ˝You take 3 drugs contaminated with mutagens- you subsequently develop skin cancer˝. Polymorbidity and multimedication against the background of polycontamination with nitrosamines appears to be the most serious problem at present. While until recently polymorbidity was considered to be a key factor in carcinogenesis (generator, trigger, inducer), today this dogma should be re-examined or looked at from another, radically different angle: from the angle of polycontamination to multimedication within polymorbidity. It is this that could provide a good explanation for the pandemic concerning skin cancer, for example. The development of relatively identical patterns of manifestation of skin tumors after concomitant intake of drugs declared as contaminated (drugs from the classes already mentioned above/ with radically different mechanism of action) supports unequivocally the thesis that: the nitrosogenesis of skin cancer is an undeniable fact that should be studied in detail. Studied because it could be eliminated. The analysis presented within this scientific thesis concerns 4 polymorbid patients who developed skin tumors within the framework of the multimedication they were assigned. The concomitant intake of medications declared as contaminated (in the presented patients) led to the manifestation of single or multiple skin neoplasms that were successfully treated surgically. Once again, the importance of potential/actual contamination of beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, oral antidiabetic drugs, and sartans in the generation of 1) non-melanocytic forms of skin cancer, and 2) melanoma precursor lesions or so-called dysplastic moles is established and validated. The possible contamination with nitrosamines of 1) other types of tricyclic antidepressant- Melitracen; 2) antidepressant of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) class: Paroxetine; 3) antidepressant of the serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs) class: Venlafaxine, as well as of the systemic anticoagulant: apixaban is highlighted for the first time in the world literature.
Topics: Humans; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors; Calcium Channel Blockers; Bisoprolol; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Paroxetine; Enalapril; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Perindopril; Losartan; Amlodipine; Valsartan; Metformin; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Incidence; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 37522769
DOI: No ID Found -
Vnitrni Lekarstvi 2023The brain is among the target organs of hypertension. Patients with hypertension have a higher risk of developing stroke as well as experiencing a decline in cognitive...
The brain is among the target organs of hypertension. Patients with hypertension have a higher risk of developing stroke as well as experiencing a decline in cognitive functions and dementia. Changes in the white matter and atrophy of the grey matter of the brain induced by high blood pressure develop insidiously since the onset of hypertension, even in young individuals. The effect of high blood pressure on the vessel wall cumulates in time; therefore, hypertension in younger people implies an increased risk of dementia in older age. Hypertension in young age cannot be considered a benign condition. Hypertension in middle age increases the risk of dementia by 61 %. Consistent and early hypertension control can reverse the adverse development towards dementia and lack of self-sufficiency in the patient. Data comparing individual antihypertensive drugs in terms of preventing dementia are scarce. However, renin angiotensin system blockers have been found to protect against Alzheimer's disease more than other classes of antihypertensive drugs. To achieve rapid and effective hypertension control, a combination of antihypertensive drugs is usually required. Using a fixed-dose triple combination of perindopril, indapamide, and amlodipine, blood pressure targets of < 130/80 mm Hg can be achieved within three months in 93 % of patients.
Topics: Middle Aged; Humans; Antihypertensive Agents; Drug Combinations; Hypertension; Amlodipine; Perindopril; Blood Pressure; Dementia
PubMed: 37468294
DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2023.047 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2023Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term condition that occurs as a result of damage to the kidneys. Early recognition of CKD is becoming increasingly common due to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a long-term condition that occurs as a result of damage to the kidneys. Early recognition of CKD is becoming increasingly common due to widespread laboratory estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) reporting, raised clinical awareness, and international adoption of the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classifications. Early recognition and management of CKD affords the opportunity to prepare for progressive kidney impairment and impending kidney replacement therapy and for intervention to reduce the risk of progression and cardiovascular disease. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are two classes of antihypertensive drugs that act on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Beneficial effects of ACEi and ARB on kidney outcomes and survival in people with a wide range of severity of kidney impairment have been reported; however, their effectiveness in the subgroup of people with early CKD (stage 1 to 3) is less certain. This is an update of a review that was last published in 2011.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of ACEi and ARB or both in the management of people with early (stage 1 to 3) CKD who do not have diabetes mellitus (DM).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 6 July 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the effect of ACEi or ARB in people with early (stage 1 to 3) CKD who did not have DM were selected for inclusion. Only studies of at least four weeks duration were selected. Authors independently assessed the retrieved titles and abstracts and, where necessary, the full text to determine which satisfied the inclusion criteria.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data extraction was carried out by two authors independently, using a standard data extraction form. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Data entry was carried out by one author and cross-checked by another. When more than one study reported similar outcomes, data were pooled using the random-effects model. Heterogeneity was analysed using a Chi² test and the I² test. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach MAIN RESULTS: Six studies randomising 9379 participants with CKD stages 1 to 3 (without DM) met our inclusion criteria. Participants were adults with hypertension; 79% were male from China, Europe, Japan, and the USA. Treatment periods ranged from 12 weeks to three years. Overall, studies were judged to be at unclear or high risk of bias across all domains, and the quality of the evidence was poor, with GRADE rated as low or very low certainty. In low certainty evidence, ACEi (benazepril 10 mg or trandolapril 2 mg) compared to placebo may make little or no difference to death (any cause) (2 studies, 8873 participants): RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.26 to 15.37; I² = 76%), total cardiovascular events (2 studies, 8873 participants): RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.05; I² = 0%), cardiovascular-related death (2 studies, 8873 participants): RR 1.73, 95% CI 0.26 to 11.66; I² = 54%), stroke (2 studies, 8873 participants): RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.03; I² = 0%), myocardial infarction (2 studies, 8873 participants): RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.20; I² = 0%), and adverse events (2 studies, 8873 participants): RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.26 to 1.41; I² = 0%). It is uncertain whether ACEi (benazepril 10 mg or trandolapril 2 mg) compared to placebo reduces congestive heart failure (1 study, 8290 participants): RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.95) or transient ischaemic attack (1 study, 583 participants): RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.06 to 15.01; I² = 0%) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. It is uncertain whether ARB (losartan 50 mg) compared to placebo (1 study, 226 participants) reduces: death (any-cause) (no events), adverse events (RR 19.34, 95% CI 1.14 to 328.30), eGFR rate of decline (MD 5.00 mL/min/1.73 m, 95% CI 3.03 to 6.97), presence of proteinuria (MD -0.65 g/24 hours, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.52), systolic blood pressure (MD -0.80 mm Hg, 95% CI -3.89 to 2.29), or diastolic blood pressure (MD -1.10 mm Hg, 95% CI -3.29 to 1.09) because the certainty of the evidence is very low. It is uncertain whether ACEi (enalapril 20 mg, perindopril 2 mg or trandolapril 1 mg) compared to ARB (olmesartan 20 mg, losartan 25 mg or candesartan 4 mg) (1 study, 26 participants) reduces: proteinuria (MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.20), systolic blood pressure (MD -3.00 mm Hg, 95% CI -6.08 to 0.08) or diastolic blood pressure (MD -1.00 mm Hg, 95% CI -3.31 to 1.31) because the certainty of the evidence is very low.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of ACEi or ARB in patients with stage 1 to 3 CKD who do not have DM. The available evidence is overall of very low certainty and high risk of bias. We have identified an area of large uncertainty for a group of patients who account for most of those diagnosed as having CKD.
Topics: Male; Adult; Humans; Female; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Losartan; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Diabetes Mellitus; Proteinuria; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
PubMed: 37466151
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007751.pub3 -
Journal of Hypertension Sep 2023To compare adherence to antihypertensive treatment between patients prescribed a three-drug single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide (P/A/I)...
OBJECTIVE
To compare adherence to antihypertensive treatment between patients prescribed a three-drug single-pill combination (SPC) of perindopril/amlodipine/indapamide (P/A/I) vs. the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a calcium-channel blocker (CCB), and a diuretic (D) as a two-drug SPC plus a third drug given separately.
METHODS
Using the healthcare utilization database of the Lombardy Region (Italy), the 28 210 patients, aged at least 40 years, who were prescribed P/A/I SPC during 2015-2018 were identified and the date of the first prescription was defined as the index date. For each patient prescribed the SPC, a comparator who started ACEI/CCB/D treatment as a two-pill combination was considered. Adherence to the triple combination was assessed over the year after the index date as the proportion of the follow-up days covered by prescription (PDC). Patients who had a PDC >75% were defined as highly adherent to drug therapy. Log-binomial regression models were fitted to estimate the risk ratio of treatment adherence in relation to the drug treatment strategy.
RESULTS
About 59 and 25% of SPC and two-pill combination users showed high adherence, respectively. Compared with patients under a three-drug two-pill combination, those who were treated with the three-drug SPC had a higher propensity to be highly adherent to the triple combination (2.38, 95% confidence interval: 2.32-2.44). This was the case regardless of the sex, age, comorbidities, and number of co-treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
In a real-life setting, patients under three-drug SPC exhibited more frequently a high adherence to antihypertensive treatment than those prescribed a three-drug two-pill combination.
Topics: Humans; Amlodipine; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hypertension; Medication Adherence; Adult
PubMed: 37432906
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003497