-
European Neuropsychopharmacology : the... Jun 2024Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is a racemic mixture of esketamine and arketamine used to treat unipolar and bipolar depression. Preliminary... (Review)
Review
Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is a racemic mixture of esketamine and arketamine used to treat unipolar and bipolar depression. Preliminary reports indicate that it may be beneficial for depressed patients reporting symptoms of anhedonia. In this systematic review we aim to assess and analyze the existing body of evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of ketamine on the domain of anhedonia. Electronic databases (PubMed, APA Psycinfo and Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 2023. Protocol was registered in PROSPERO under the identifier CRD42023476603. A total of twenty-two studies, including four randomized-controlled trials and eighteen open-label trials were included. All studies reported alleviation of anhedonia symptoms following ketamine or esketamine administration, regardless of the number of infusions. Several important limitations were included, first and foremost low number of placebo-controlled randomized-controlled trials. This review indicates a potential anti-anhedonic effect of ketamine in patients with depression. Several trials used neuroimaging techniques which confirm ketamine's effect on functional connectivity correlating with the improvement in anhedonia. Despite considerable variations in methodology and the specific brain regions investigated, these studies collectively point towards ketamine's neuroplastic effects in mitigating anhedonia.
PubMed: 38917771
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.04.014 -
Nutrition Reviews Jun 2024The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) has been rising significantly over the years. Recent studies have shown beneficial effects of cinnamon on...
CONTEXT
The global prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) has been rising significantly over the years. Recent studies have shown beneficial effects of cinnamon on metabolic biomarkers.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this review was to assess the effect of cinnamon supplementation on metabolic biomarkers in patients with DM2.
DATA SOURCES
The Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase databases were searched up to November 10, 2022.
DATA EXTRACTION
A systematic search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of cinnamon supplementation on metabolic biomarkers, in adults and the elderly with DM2, and comparing the data for a cinnamon intervention group with that for a placebo group or a control group. The main exclusion criteria were studies (1) with other types of diabetes (ie, gestational diabetes or type 1 diabetes), (2) without cinnamon consumption, (3) that did not evaluate metabolic biomarkers, or (4) in vitro and animal studies. Two researchers independently screened 924 records, evaluated full-text studies, extracted data, and appraised their quality. A third researcher was consulted to resolve any discrepancies. The data were pooled using random-effects models and expressed as the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and quantified using I2 statistics. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) instrument. Sensitivity analysis and the GRADE system were used to assess the robustness and certainty of the findings.
DATA ANALYSIS
In total, 28 RCTs with a duration ranging from 30 to 120 days and a total enrollment of 3054 patients with DM2 were included. Participants consuming cinnamon showed a significant reduction in fasting blood glucose (FBG) (WMD: -15.26 mg/dL; 95% CI: -22.23 to -8.30; I2 = 88%), postprandial glucose (WMD: -39.22 mg/dL; 95% CI: -63.90 to -14.55; I2 = 100%), HbA1c (WMD: -0.56 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.13; I2 = 94%), and HOMA-IR (WMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.13 to -0.39; I2 = 22%) compared with the control group. An intervention of cinnamon in capsule form reduced FBG (WMD:-18.43 mg/dL, 95% CI: -26.32 to -10.53; I2 = 89%), postprandial glucose (WMD: -44.83 mg/dL, 95% CI: -70.67 to -18.99; I2 = 100%), HbA1c (WMD: -0.56 mg/dL, 95% CI: -1.02 to -0.09; I2 = 94%), total cholesterol (WMD: -13.39 mg/dL; 95% CI: -24.71 to -2.07; I2 = 96%), LDL-C (WMD: -6.49 mg/dL, 95% CI: -12.69 to -0.29; I2 = 92%), and triglycerides (WND: -19.75 mg/dL; 95% CI, -33.71 to -5.80; I2 = 88%). Both doses (≤2 g/day and >2 g/day) reduced FBG and postprandial glucose. Only cinnamon doses of ≤2 g/day reduced HbA1c (WMD: -0.68 mg/dL, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.1; I2 = 92%), HOMA-IR (WMD: -0.94 mg/dL; 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.67; I2 = 0%), and BMI (WMD: -1.18 kg/m2; 95% CI: -1.97 to -0.39; I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSION
The data suggest that cinnamon improves the glycemic and lipid profile and reduces the BMI, particularly in DM2 patients who receive cinnamon supplementation in capsule form and at a dose of ≤2 g/day.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration no. CRD42022370332.
PubMed: 38917435
DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuae058 -
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry Jun 2024To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants. In this... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Efficacy and Safety of Esmethadone (REL-1017) in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder and Inadequate Response to Standard Antidepressants: A Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.
To test esmethadone (REL-1017) as adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and inadequate response to standard antidepressants. In this phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, outpatients with MDD () were randomized to daily oral esmethadone (75 mg on day 1, followed by 25 mg daily on days 2 through 28) or placebo between December 2020 and December 2022. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline (CFB) to day 28 in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants. The per-protocol (PP) population included completers without major protocol deviations impacting assessment. Post hoc analyses included participants with severe depression (baseline MADRS score ≥35). For the ITT analysis (n = 227), mean CFB was 15.1 (SD 11.3) for esmethadone (n = 113) and 12.9 (SD 10.4) for placebo (n = 114), with a mean difference (MD) of 2.3, which was not statistically significant ( = .154; Cohen effect size [ES] = 0.21). Remission rates were 22.1% and 13.2% ( = .076), and response rates were 39.8% and 27.2% ( = .044) with esmethadone and placebo, respectively. For the PP analysis (n = 198), mean CFB was 15.6 (SD 11.2) for esmethadone (n = 101) and 12.5 (SD 9.9) for placebo (n = 97), with an MD of 3.1 ( = .051; ES =0.29). In post hoc analyses of patients with baseline MADRS ≥35 in the ITT population (n = 112), MD was 6.9; = .0059; ES = 0.57, and for the PP population (n = 98), MD was 7.9; = .0015; ES = 0.69. Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild or moderate and transient, with no significant differences between groups. The primary end point was not met. Esmethadone showed stronger efficacy in PP than in ITT analyses, with the discrepancy not attributable to AEs impacting treatment adherence. Significant efficacy occurred in post hoc analyses of patients with severe depression. Esmethadone was well tolerated, consistent with prior studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04688164.
Topics: Humans; Depressive Disorder, Major; Male; Adult; Female; Double-Blind Method; Middle Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; Treatment Outcome; Drug Therapy, Combination
PubMed: 38917366
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.24m15265 -
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of... Jun 2024Lithium is the gold standard drug in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Despite increasing scientific interest, relatively few patients with bipolar disorder receive...
Lithium is the gold standard drug in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Despite increasing scientific interest, relatively few patients with bipolar disorder receive lithium therapy. Lithium is the only drug that is effective in the prophylaxis of manic, depressive, and suicidal symptoms. Lithium therapy is also associated with a variety of adverse drug reactions and the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. Numerous studies have focussed on the efficacy and safety of both lithium-monotherapy and lithium-add-on therapy. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic overview of clinical studies on lithium therapy for bipolar disorder from the last 7 years and to present a critical analysis of these studies. The results provide an up-to-date overview of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of lithium therapy for bipolar disorder and thus improve the pharmacotherapy of bipolar disorder. A total of 59 studies were analysed using various analysis parameters. The studies were also categorised into different subgroups. These are lithium-monotherapy, lithium vs. placebo/drug, and lithium + adjunctive therapy. The majority of the studies (N = 20) had a duration of only 3-8 weeks. Only 13 studies lasted for > 40 weeks. Lithium was superior to aripiprazole, valproic acid, and quetiapine in terms of improving manic symptoms. Lithium therapy resulted in a lower relapse rate compared to valproic acid therapy. Lithium was more neuroprotectively effective than quetiapine. Fourteen of the 22 add-on therapies to lithium showed a predominantly positive effect on the treatment outcome compared to lithium-monotherapy. Only the add-on therapy with sertraline led to a higher rate of study discontinuations than lithium-monotherapy. Lithium is a safe and effective treatment option for children. However, risperidone and quetiapine were superior to lithium in some aspects, which is why these drugs should be considered as an alternative treatment option for children. Collectively, current clinical studies highlight the relevance of lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder.
PubMed: 38916833
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-024-03210-8 -
Inflammopharmacology Jun 2024In a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (RCT), we investigated the effect of astaxanthin (AST) on pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress...
Astaxanthin treatment decreases pro-inflammatory cytokines and improves reproductive outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing assisted reproductive technology: A randomized clinical trial.
RESEARCH QUESTION
In a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (RCT), we investigated the effect of astaxanthin (AST) on pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress (OS) markers, and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes in 44 infertile Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) patients.
DESIGN
Patients with PCOS were randomly divided into two groups. The intervention group received 6 mg AST, and the control group received placebo daily for 8 weeks. Blood samples were obtained from all patients before and after intervention and follicular fluid (FF) was collected during the ART procedure. Interleukin (IL) -6, IL-1β were evaluated from serum samples and FF and OS markers (malondialdehyde [MDA], catalase [CAT], superoxide dismutase [SOD], and reactive oxygen species [ROS]) were measured from FF. The groups were compared for ART outcomes as well.
RESULTS
A significant decrease in IL-6 and IL-1β concentrations (both, P = < 0.01) serum levels was found following AST treatment. FF cytokine levels and OS markers did not differ significantly between the groups. Reproductive outcomes, including the number of oocytes retrieved (P = 0.01), the MII oocyte count (P = 0.007), oocyte maturity rate (MII %) (P = 0.02) and number of frozen embryos (P = 0.03) significantly improved after intervention. No significant differences were found in chemical, clinical and multiple pregnancies between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS
AST pretreatment may modify inflammation and improve ART outcomes in PCOS infertile patients. Further investigations are recommended to verify these findings.
PubMed: 38916710
DOI: 10.1007/s10787-024-01504-0 -
NEJM Evidence Jul 2024CD8+ T regulatory (Treg) cells that recognize the nonclassical class 1b molecule Qa-1/human leukocyte antigen E (Q/E CD8+ Treg cells) are important in maintaining... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
CD8+ T regulatory (Treg) cells that recognize the nonclassical class 1b molecule Qa-1/human leukocyte antigen E (Q/E CD8+ Treg cells) are important in maintaining self-tolerance. We sought to investigate the role that these T cells play in type 1 diabetes (T1D) pathogenesis and whether an intervention targeting this mechanism may delay T1D progression.
METHODS
We conducted a phase 1/2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the autologous dendritic cell therapy AVT001 that included participants at least 16 years of age, within 1 year of T1D diagnosis, and with ex vivo evidence of a defect in Q/E CD8+ Treg function. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to AVT001 or placebo, which was administered in three monthly intravenous infusions. The primary end point was safety; efficacy end points included changes from baseline in C-peptide area under the curve (AUC) during a 4-hour mixed meal, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and insulin dose.
RESULTS
Sixteen patients received AVT001, and nine received placebo. Similar rates and severity of adverse events were observed in both groups. None of the patients in the AVT001 group had serious adverse events through visit day 360. Compared with placebo, treatment with ATV001 was associated with less decline from baseline log-transformed C-peptide AUC (nmol/l), with the treatment effect between AVT001 and placebo at day 150 of 0.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.15) and at day 360 of 0.10 (95% CI, 0.04 to 0.15). No clear differences in change in HbA1c and insulin dose from baseline were observed between groups. Estimated treatment effects of AVT001 versus placebo at day 360 were -0.17% (95% CI, -0.60 to 0.26%) for HbA1c and -0.06 U/kg/day (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.02) for daily insulin dose.
CONCLUSIONS
In this phase 1/2 trial, AVT001 did not result in dose-limiting adverse events. Potential signals of efficacy observed here warrant further evaluation in a fully powered trial. (Funded by Avotres Inc. and the Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03895996.).
Topics: Humans; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Male; Female; Dendritic Cells; Double-Blind Method; Adult; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Glycated Hemoglobin; Adolescent; T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory; Insulin; C-Peptide
PubMed: 38916421
DOI: 10.1056/EVIDoa2300238 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Jun 2024Opioids used to manage severe pain in acute pancreatitis might exacerbate the disease through effects on gastrointestinal and immune functions. Methylnaltrexone, a...
OBJECTIVES
Opioids used to manage severe pain in acute pancreatitis might exacerbate the disease through effects on gastrointestinal and immune functions. Methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, may counteract these effects without changing analgesia.
METHODS
This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial included adult patients with acute pancreatitis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome at four Danish centers. Participants were randomized to receive five days of continuous intravenous methylnaltrexone (0.15mg/kg/day) or placebo added to the standard of care. The primary endpoint was the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score after 48 hours of treatment. Main secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid use, disease severity, and mortality.
RESULTS
In total, 105 patients (54% males) were randomized to methylnaltrexone (n=51) or placebo (n=54). After 48 hours, the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score was 134.3 points in the methylnaltrexone group and 130.5 points in the placebo group (difference, 3.8 [95% CI, -40.1 to 47.6]; P=0.87). At 48 hours, we found no differences between groups in pain severity (0.0 [95% CI, -0.8 to 0.9]; P=0.94), pain interference (-0.3 [95% CI, -1.4 to 0.8]; P=0.55), and morphine equivalent doses (6.5 mg [95% CI, -2.1 to 15.2]; P=0.14). Methylnaltrexone also did not affect the risk of severe disease (8% [95% CI, -11 to 28]; P=0.38) and mortality (6% [95% CI, -1 to 12]; P=0.11). The medication was well-tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS
Methylnaltrexone treatment did not achieve superiority over placebo for reducing the severity of acute pancreatitis.
PubMed: 38916223
DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002904 -
Health Science Reports Jun 2024The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of dextrose prolotherapy on individuals diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the impact of dextrose prolotherapy on individuals diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
METHODS
To conduct a thorough investigation, a variety of leading international databases were checked, including PubMed (Medline), Scopus, Web of Sciences, EMBASE (Elsevier), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. The search covered a period from January 2000 to the end of June 2023, which facilitated the collection of relevant studies.
RESULTS
The findings of the study revealed that when the studies utilizing the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Index tool (WOMAC) were combined, patients with KOA who received prolotherapy experienced an improvement in function compared with those who received other treatments (SMD: 0.20; 95% Confidence Interval [1]: -0.11, 0.51; value SMD = 0.221; : 78.49%; < 0.001). Additionally, there was a decrease in mean pain and stiffness among patients who received prolotherapy compared with those who received other treatments or a placebo [(SMD: -0.95; 95% CI: -1.14, -0.76; value SMD < 0.001; : 59.35%; = 0.070) and (SMD: -0.21; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.10; value SMD < 0.001; : 88.11%; < 0.001)]. Furthermore, based on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, there was a reduction of 0.81 units out of 10 in mean pain for patients with KOA who received prolotherapy (SMD: -0.81; 95% CI: -5.63, 4.10; value SMD = 0.693; : 48.54%; = 0.08).
CONCLUSION
Drawing from the data analysis performed in this meta-analysis, it is apparent that dextrose prolotherapy exhibits promising effectiveness in reducing joint pain and stiffness, as well as improving functional performance in individuals suffering from KOA. Furthermore, it is recommended that forthcoming studies incorporate follow-up periods to guide decisions concerning the duration of prolotherapy's effects.
PubMed: 38915358
DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.2145 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International May 2024Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have -limited survival and few treatment options. We studied whether mistletoe extract (ME), in addition to comprehensive... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer have -limited survival and few treatment options. We studied whether mistletoe extract (ME), in addition to comprehensive oncological treatment and palliative care, prolongs overall survival (OS) and -improves health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
METHODS
The double-blind, placebo-controlled MISTRAL trial was conducted in Swedish oncology centers. The main inclusion criteria were advanced exocrine pancreatic cancer and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. The subjects were randomly assigned to ME (n=143) or placebo (n=147) and were stratified by study site and by eligibility (yes/no) for palliative chemotherapy (June 2016-December 2021). ME or placebo was injected subcutaneously three times a week for nine months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); one of the secondary endpoints was the HRQoL dimension global health/QoL (EORTC-QLQ-C30), as assessed at seven time points over nine months. Trial registration: EudraCT 2014-004552-64, NCT02948309.
RESULTS
No statistically significant benefit of adding ME to standard treatment was seen with respect to either OS or global health/QoL. The adjusted hazard ratio for OS was 1.13 [0.89; 1.44], with a median survival time of 7.8 and 8.3 months for ME and placebo, respectively. The figures for the HRQoL dimension "global health/QoL" were similar in the two groups (p=0.86). The number, severity, and outcome of the reported adverse events were similar as well, except for more common local skin reactions at ME injection sites (66% vs. 1%).
CONCLUSION
ME is unlikely to have a clinically significant effect on OS or the HRQoL dimension global health/QoL when administered in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in addition to comprehensive cancer care.
PubMed: 38915151
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0080 -
Journal of Health, Population, and... Jun 2024Even after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of mild cases remains high, requiring continuous control. Curcumin, owing to its anti-inflammatory properties,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION
Even after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of mild cases remains high, requiring continuous control. Curcumin, owing to its anti-inflammatory properties, can suppress vital proliferation and cytokine secretion in animal models. We developed a highly absorbable curcumin, curcuRouge (cR), which is approximately 100 times more orally bioavailable than conventional curcumin. We evaluated the effect of cR on the inhibition of disease progression in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients.
METHODS
This study evaluated the effect of 7-day oral intake of cR (360 mg twice daily). Patients within 5 days of COVID-19 diagnosis were randomly assigned to a placebo or cR group in a double-blind manner.
RESULTS
Primary endpoint events [body temperature (BT) ≥ 37.5 °C and saturation of percutaneous oxygen (SpO2) < 96%] were fewer than expected, and the rate of these events was 2.8% in the cR group (2/71) and 6.0% in the placebo group (4/67); hazard ratio (HR) = 0.532, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.097-2.902. Patients receiving cR tended to take fewer antipyretic medications than those receiving placebo (HR = 0.716, 95% CI 0.374-1.372). Among patients with a normal range of BT at baseline, the BT change rate was significantly (p = 0.014) lower in the cR group (- 0.34%) versus placebo (- 0.01%).
CONCLUSION
The relative suppression of event rates and antipyretic medications taken, and significant decrease of subclinical BT support the anti-inflammatory effects of cR in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with COVID-19.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (CRB5200002).
Topics: Humans; Curcumin; Double-Blind Method; Male; Female; Middle Aged; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Administration, Oral; Adult; COVID-19; Aged; Treatment Outcome; SARS-CoV-2; Biological Availability
PubMed: 38915116
DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00584-6