-
Critical Care Explorations Jul 2024The temporal trends of crystalloid resuscitation in severely injured trauma patients after ICU admission are not well characterized. We hypothesized early crystalloid... (Observational Study)
Observational Study Comparative Study
OBJECTIVES
The temporal trends of crystalloid resuscitation in severely injured trauma patients after ICU admission are not well characterized. We hypothesized early crystalloid resuscitation was associated with less volume and better outcomes than delaying crystalloid.
DESIGN
Retrospective, observational.
SETTING
High-volume level 1 academic trauma center.
PATIENTS
Adult trauma patients admitted to the ICU with emergency department serum lactate greater than or equal to 4 mmol/dL, elevated lactate (≥ 2 mmol/L) at ICU admission, and normal lactate by 48 hours.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
For the 333 subjects, we analyzed patient and injury characteristics and the first 48 hours of ICU course. Receipt of greater than or equal to 500 mL/hr of crystalloid in the first 6 hours of ICU admission was used to distinguish early vs. late resuscitation. Outcomes included ICU length of stay (LOS), ventilator days, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Unadjusted and multivariable regression methods were used to compare early resuscitation vs. late resuscitation. Compared with the early resuscitation group, the late resuscitation group received more volume by 48 hours (5.5 vs. 4.1 L; p ≤ 0.001), had longer ICU LOS (9 vs. 5 d; p ≤ 0.001), more ventilator days (5 vs. 2 d; p ≤ 0.001), and higher occurrence rate of AKI (38% vs. 11%; p ≤ 0.001). On multivariable regression, late resuscitation remained associated with longer ICU LOS and ventilator days and higher odds of AKI.
CONCLUSIONS
Delaying resuscitation is associated with both higher volumes of crystalloid by 48 hours and worse outcomes compared with early resuscitation. Judicious crystalloid given early in ICU admission could improve outcomes in the severely injured.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Male; Female; Resuscitation; Fluid Therapy; Wounds and Injuries; Middle Aged; Intensive Care Units; Adult; Crystalloid Solutions; Length of Stay; Time Factors; Trauma Centers; Isotonic Solutions
PubMed: 38958536
DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001097 -
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Jul 2024Tissue-engineered heart valve (TEHV) has emerged as a prospective alternative to conventional valve prostheses. The decellularized heart valve (DHV) represents a...
Tissue-engineered heart valve (TEHV) has emerged as a prospective alternative to conventional valve prostheses. The decellularized heart valve (DHV) represents a promising TEHV scaffold that preserves the natural three-dimensional structure and retains essential biological activity. However, the limited mechanical strength, fast degradation, poor hemocompatibility, and lack of endothelialization of DHV restrict its clinical use, which is necessary for ensuring its long-term durability. Herein, we used oxidized chondroitin sulfate (ChS), one of the main components of the extracellular matrix with various biological activities, to cross-link DHV to overcome the above problems. In addition, the ChS-adipic dihydrazide was used to react with residual aldehyde groups, thus preventing potential calcification. The results indicated notable enhancements in mechanical properties and resilience against elastase and collagenase degradation as well as the ability to withstand extended periods of storage without compromising the structural integrity of valve scaffolds. Additionally, the newly cross-linked valves exhibited favorable hemocompatibility and , thereby demonstrating exceptional biocompatibility. Furthermore, the scaffolds exhibited traits of gradual degradation and resistance to calcification through a rat subcutaneous implantation model. In the rat abdominal aorta implantation model, the scaffolds demonstrated favorable endothelialization, commendable patency, and a diminished pro-inflammatory response. As a result, the newly constructed DHV scaffold offers a compelling alternative to traditional valve prostheses, which potentially advances the field of TEHV.
PubMed: 38958205
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c03171 -
Current Opinion in Critical Care Aug 2024To examine the evolving landscape of cardiac surgery, focusing on the increasing complexity of patients and the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in managing... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
To examine the evolving landscape of cardiac surgery, focusing on the increasing complexity of patients and the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in managing perioperative low cardiac output syndrome (P-LCOS).
RECENT FINDINGS
P-LCOS is a significant predictor of mortality in cardiac surgery patients. Preoperative risk factors, such as cardiogenic shock and elevated lactate levels, can help identify those at higher risk. Proactive use of MCS, rather than reactive implementation after P-LCOS develops, may lead to improved outcomes by preventing severe organ hypoperfusion. The emerging concept of "protected cardiac surgery" emphasizes early identification of these high-risk patients and planned MCS utilization. Additionally, specific MCS strategies are being developed and refined for various cardiac conditions, including AMI-CS, valvular surgeries, and pulmonary thromboendarterectomy.
SUMMARY
This paper explores the shifting demographics and complexities in cardiac surgery patients. It emphasizes the importance of proactive, multidisciplinary approaches to identify high-risk patients and implement early MCS to prevent P-LCOS and improve outcomes. The concept of protected cardiac surgery, involving planned MCS use and shared decision-making, is highlighted. The paper also discusses MCS strategies tailored to specific cardiac procedures and the ethical considerations surrounding MCS implementation.
Topics: Humans; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Cardiac Output, Low; Postoperative Complications; Heart-Assist Devices; Shock, Cardiogenic; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Risk Factors; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 38958182
DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001179 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2024Postoperative myocardial infarction (POMI) is associated with major surgeries and remains the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in people undergoing vascular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Postoperative myocardial infarction (POMI) is associated with major surgeries and remains the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in people undergoing vascular surgery, with an incidence rate ranging from 5% to 20%. Preoperative coronary interventions, such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), may help prevent acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major vascular surgery when used in addition to routine perioperative drugs (e.g. statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and antiplatelet agents), CABG by creating new blood circulation routes that bypass the blockages in the coronary vessels, and PCI by opening up blocked blood vessels. There is currently uncertainty around the benefits and harms of preoperative coronary interventions.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Vascular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, LILACS, and CINAHL EBSCO on 13 March 2023. We also searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that compared the use of preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care versus usual care for preventing acute myocardial infarction during major open vascular or endovascular surgery. We included participants of any sex or any age undergoing major open vascular surgery, major endovascular surgery, or hybrid vascular surgery.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes of interest were acute myocardial infarction, all-cause mortality, and adverse events resulting from preoperative coronary interventions. Our secondary outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, quality of life, vessel or graft secondary patency, and length of hospital stay. We reported perioperative and long-term outcomes (more than 30 days after intervention). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three RCTs (1144 participants). Participants were randomised to receive either preoperative coronary revascularisation with PCI or CABG plus usual care or only usual care before major vascular surgery. One trial enrolled participants if they had no apparent evidence of coronary artery disease. Another trial selected participants classified as high risk for coronary disease through preoperative clinical and laboratorial testing. We excluded one trial from the meta-analysis because participants from both the control and the intervention groups were eligible to undergo preoperative coronary revascularisation. We identified a high risk of performance bias in all included trials, with one trial displaying a high risk of other bias. However, the risk of bias was either low or unclear in other domains. We observed no difference between groups for perioperative acute myocardial infarction, but the evidence is very uncertain (risk ratio (RR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 4.57; 2 trials, 888 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One trial showed a reduction in incidence of long-term (> 30 days) acute myocardial infarction in participants allocated to the preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care group, but the evidence was very uncertain (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.28; 1 trial, 426 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There was little to no effect on all-cause mortality in the perioperative period when comparing the preoperative coronary intervention plus usual care group to usual care alone, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.04; 2 trials, 888 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of preoperative coronary interventions on long-term (follow up: 2.7 to 6.2 years) all-cause mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.80; 2 trials, 888 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study reported no adverse effects related to coronary angiography, whereas the other two studies reported five deaths due to revascularisations. There may be no effect on cardiovascular mortality when comparing preoperative coronary revascularisation plus usual care to usual care in the short term (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.32; 1 trial, 426 participants; low-certainty evidence). Preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care in the short term may reduce length of hospital stay slightly when compared to usual care alone (mean difference -1.17 days, 95% CI -2.05 to -0.28; 1 trial, 462 participants; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence due to concerns about risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. None of the included trials reported on quality of life or vessel graft patency at either time point, and no study reported on adverse effects, cardiovascular mortality, or length of hospital stay at long-term follow-up.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care may have little or no effect on preventing perioperative acute myocardial infarction and reducing perioperative all-cause mortality compared to usual care, but the evidence is very uncertain. Similarly, limited, very low-certainty evidence shows that preoperative coronary interventions may have little or no effect on reducing long-term all-cause mortality. There is very low-certainty evidence that preoperative coronary interventions plus usual care may prevent long-term myocardial infarction, and low-certainty evidence that they may reduce length of hospital stay slightly, but not cardiovascular mortality in the short term, when compared to usual care alone. Adverse effects of preoperative coronary interventions were poorly reported in trials. Quality of life and vessel or graft patency were not reported. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence most frequently for high risk of bias, inconsistency, or imprecision. None of the analysed trials provided significant data on subgroups of patients who could potentially experience more substantial benefits from preoperative coronary intervention (e.g. altered ventricular ejection fraction). There is a need for evidence from larger and homogeneous RCTs to provide adequate statistical power to assess the role of preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.
Topics: Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Coronary Artery Bypass; Postoperative Complications; Endovascular Procedures; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Preoperative Care; Bias; Perioperative Period; Length of Stay
PubMed: 38958136
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014920.pub2 -
Wound Repair and Regeneration :... Jul 2024Keloid disorder is a morbid and disfiguring benign fibroproliferative disease with a higher incidence in groups with darker skin pigmentation. Predicting keloidogenesis... (Review)
Review
Keloid disorder is a morbid and disfiguring benign fibroproliferative disease with a higher incidence in groups with darker skin pigmentation. Predicting keloidogenesis in patients is difficult with treatment primarily aimed at preventing further scar expansion and improving aesthetics without addressing their unknown underlying pathophysiology. We aimed to identify potential genetic predispositions to keloid scarring in the literature. A search was conducted on 21 August 2023, by the first and second authors independently from 1985 to August 2023 using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and CINAHL. The following MeSH terms were used: 'Keloid', 'Risk' and 'Genetic'. Two researchers independently searched for studies based on titles and abstracts and screened filtered articles by reviewing full text. If no agreement could be reached, a third senior author designated whether the article should be included. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement as the basis of our organisation. Human studies with genetic analysis to determine an association of a protein or gene to keloidogenesis were selected for inclusion. Studies in languages other than English, reviews, conference articles, and book chapters were excluded. Fifty studies met inclusion criteria. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system was broadly implicated, and the DRB1*15 allele was associated with an increased risk of keloid in three separate ethnic groups. Some HLA Class I alleles were associated with keloid in one population but not in others. Additionally, polymorphisms in the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (NEDD4) signal cascade and vitamin D receptor (VDR) have been implicated in diverse groups. No current genetic test can predict keloid risk. Our review identified candidate predisposing genes, including NEDD4, VDR and components of the HLA system. Further studies in heterogeneous populations are needed to identify reliable screening targets.
PubMed: 38958095
DOI: 10.1111/wrr.13203 -
Surgical Infections Jul 2024Hip fractures are the most common serious injury in the elderly, associated with disability, morbidity, and mortality. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious...
Hip fractures are the most common serious injury in the elderly, associated with disability, morbidity, and mortality. Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious post-operative complication. This prospective cohort study outlines how our center made cumulative improvements in SSI incidence rates, reaching a 12-month average of 0.5%. All patients undergoing hip fracture operation between 2016 and 2021 were included. The primary outcome measure was confirmed SSI, according to the Public Health England definition. Results were compared with the baseline recordings by an independent SSI team in 2013. Demographic data were compared with National Hip Fracture Database records. Peri-operative infection control and wound management tactics introduced between 2014 and 2021 were collated to gain an overview care bundle. Baseline recordings identified a 9.0% SSI rate in a three-month observation period. In our study, 3,138 hip fracture operative cases were completed between October 2016 and December 2021. There were 9 superficial and 32 deep infections identified, yielding an overall infection rate of 1.3%. However, when analyzing the 12-month average, there was consistent decline in SSI from the baseline 9.0% in 2013 to 0.5% in 2021 (p < 0.05). A peri-operative care bundle included pre-operative bleeding risk assessment. Intra-operatively, double preparation and draping is used for arthroplasty. Broad-spectrum antibiotic agents and tranexamic acid are administered. Meticulous hemostasis and watertight wound closure are observed. Anti-coagulated patients received negative pressure dressings. Post-operatively, a dedicated senior lead team provided daily inpatient review of patients, with urgent consultant review of all wound healing concerns. Patients with a hip fracture have numerous risk factors for SSI. A dedicated multi-focal tactic, adopted by a multi-disciplinary department, can yield substantial risk reduction. Each intervention is evidence based and contributes to cumulative improvement. By prioritizing infection prevention, we have minimized the need for complex infection management interventions and achieved an annual saving of £860,000 for our trust.
PubMed: 38958043
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2024.019 -
Surgical Infections Jul 2024The objective of this study was to investigate the association between pre-operative body mass index (BMI) and surgical infection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA)...
The objective of this study was to investigate the association between pre-operative body mass index (BMI) and surgical infection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients treated with curative resection. Consecutive pCCA patients were enrolled from four tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2022. According to pre-operative BMI, the patients were divided into three groups: low BMI (≤18.4 kg/m), normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m), and high BMI (≥25.0 kg/m). The incidence of surgical infection among the three groups was compared. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the independent risk factors associated with surgical infection. A total of 371 patients were enrolled, including 283 patients (76.3%) in the normal BMI group, 30 patients (8.1%) in the low BMI group, and 58 patients (15.6%) in the high BMI group. The incidence of surgical infection was significantly higher in the patients in the low BMI and high BMI groups than in the normal BMI group. The multivariable logistic regression model showed that low BMI and high BMI were independently associated with the occurrence of surgical infection. The pCCA patients with a normal BMI treated with curative resection could have a lower risk of surgical infection than pCCA patients with an abnormal BMI.
PubMed: 38957995
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2023.382 -
Surgical Infections Jul 2024Post-partum infection is a major contributor to maternal mortality and is responsible for approximately 10% of maternal fatalities worldwide. The risk of infection is...
Post-partum infection is a major contributor to maternal mortality and is responsible for approximately 10% of maternal fatalities worldwide. The risk of infection is substantially higher in cesarean section procedures. Approximately 8% of women who undergo cesarean sections are susceptible to infection. Although the body of evidence supporting the regular pre-operative utilization of prophylactic antibiotic treatment is steadily expanding, its usefulness in cesarean sections has not yet been standardized, and post-partum infection is still a serious medical challenge. We aimed to retrospectively assess the prophylactic effectiveness of cefazolin in combination with other antibiotic agents in cesarean sections. Both uni-variable and multi-variable analyses were conducted to identify factors that may affect cefazolin pre-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cesarean section operations. The uni-variable analysis included timing of administration, operation duration, body mass index (BMI), and wound type. A multi-variable logistic regression model was then created to determine which variables provide independent information in the context of other variables. Time of administration did not affect prophylactic cefazolin efficacy. However, prophylactic cefazolin was 1.43 and 1.77 times more effective when the operation lasted for 45 minutes or more, compared with operations that were shorter than 45 minutes. Patients with a BMI ranging from 18 to 29 kg/m showed increased efficacy of prophylactic cefazolin compared with obese patients with a BMI exceeding 30 kg/m. The effectiveness of prophylactic cefazolin decreased by 95% in patients with clean-contaminated surgical incisions compared with those with clean surgical incisions. Our findings demonstrate that administering pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic agents to women undergoing cesarean section resulted in a reduction in post-partum infections, thereby reducing maternal mortality. Furthermore, optimal timing of administration, re-dosing if necessary, length of prophylactic medication, and dosing adjustments for obese patients are crucial factors in preventing surgical site infections and promoting antimicrobial stewardship.
PubMed: 38957977
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2024.048 -
Surgical Infections Jul 2024The prophylactic use of antibiotics in parotid region surgery continues to be a subject of debate. The aim of this study is to elucidate the impact of antibiotic...
The prophylactic use of antibiotics in parotid region surgery continues to be a subject of debate. The aim of this study is to elucidate the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical site infections (SSIs) in parotid region surgery. Patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis during the peri-operative period were designated as group 1, whereas those who did not were categorized into group 2. Group 1 cases were further subdivided into three subgroups based on different antibiotic usage patterns. Patient individual information was collected. Clinical data such as surgical duration, post-operative hospital stay, incision infection status, and antibiotic usage were recorded. All data were compared and analyzed among different groups. A total of 357 patients were included in the study, with no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics. Pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologists scores did not significantly differ between groups (p = 0.151), but there was a significant distinction in National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance (NNIS) index values (p = 0.044). Furthermore, surgical duration (p = 0.001) and pathology types (p = 0.016) differed significantly. The post-operative hospital stay in group 1 was longer than that in group 2 (p < 0.01). The post-operative SSI rate in group 1 was lower than that in group 2 without statistical significance (2.55% vs. 5.59%, p = 0.141). The logistic regression analysis showed that malignant tumors, longer surgical durations, and higher NNIS index scores correlated positively with post-operative SSI rates. Meanwhile, compared with non-use, all three different antibiotic use modes correlated negatively with SSI occurrence. Antibiotic prophylaxis in parotid gland surgery shows no significant reduction in SSI occurrence. If there is a compelling reason to administer prophylactic antibiotics, pre-operative single dose may be a relatively feasible measure for preventing SSIs.
PubMed: 38957972
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2024.054 -
Surgical Infections Jul 2024Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a substantial healthcare burden in low- and middle- income countries. "Clean Cut" is a checklist-based infection prevention and...
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a substantial healthcare burden in low- and middle- income countries. "Clean Cut" is a checklist-based infection prevention and control (IPC) program intended to improve compliance to peri-operative IPC standards. We aim to study the short-term and long-term impact of its implementation in a tertiary care cancer referral center. This was a single institute, prospective interventional study. Patients undergoing elective head-neck surgical procedures were included. The "Clean Cut" program consisting of surveillance, audits, and IPC training was implemented for 6 months, after which there was no active oversight. Post-intervention (T2) and 1-year follow-up (T3) data regarding compliance to core IPC practices and SSI rates were compared with baseline (T1). One hundred eighty six patients were included with 50 (26.9%), 86 (46.2%), and 50 (26.9%) patients at T1, T2, and T3, respectively. At baseline, teams complied with a mean of 3.56 of the six critical components of infection control processes which rose to 4.66 (p < 0.001) at T2, but decreased to 4.02 at T3 (p = 0.053). The SSI rate at baseline decreased significantly after Clean Cut implementation [16 (32%) vs. 12 (13.95%), p = 0.012], but returned to baseline levels after 1 year [17 (34%), p = 0.006]. Implementation of the "Clean Cut" program increases compliance to infection control processes and reduces SSI rates in the short term. Without continuing oversight, these rates return to baseline values after 1 year.
PubMed: 38957964
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2023.334