-
Journal of Arrhythmia Jun 2024Despite the positive impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) on prognosis, their implantation is often...
Multicenter prospective observational study to clarify the current status and clinical outcome in Japanese patients who have an indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) (TRANSITION JAPAN-ICD/WCD study): Rationale and design of a...
BACKGROUND
Despite the positive impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) on prognosis, their implantation is often withheld especially in Japanese heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) who have not experienced ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for uncertain reasons. Recent advancements in heart failure (HF) medications have significantly improved the prognosis for HFrEF. Given this context, a critical reassessment of the treatment and prognosis of ICDs and WCDs is essential, as it has the potential to reshape awareness and treatment strategies for these patients.
METHODS
We are initiating a prospective multicenter observational study for HFrEF patients eligible for ICD in primary and secondary prevention, and WCD, regardless of device use, including all consenting patients. Study subjects are to be enrolled from 31 participant hospitals located throughout Japan from April 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024, and each will be followed up for 1 year or more. The planned sample size is 651 cases. The primary endpoint is the rate of cardiac implantable electronic device implementation. Other endpoints include the incidence of VT/VF and sudden death, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization, other events. We will collect clinical background information plus each patient's symptoms, Clinical Frailty Scale score, laboratory test results, echocardiographic and electrocardiographic parameters, and serial changes will also be secondary endpoints.
RESULTS
Not applicable.
CONCLUSION
This study offers invaluable insights into understanding the role of ICD/WCD in Japanese HF patients in the new era of HF medication.
PubMed: 38939793
DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13028 -
Journal of Arrhythmia Jun 2024Warfarin is considered the primary oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Although warfarin can...
BACKGROUND
Warfarin is considered the primary oral anticoagulant for patients with atrial fibrillation and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Although warfarin can offer significant stroke prevention in this population, the accompanying major bleeding risks make warfarin nearly prohibitive. Apixaban was shown to be superior to warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism, with a lower risk of bleeding and mortality in a large, randomized trial of individuals with mostly normal renal function but none with ESRD.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed evidence comparing apixaban versus warfarin for atrial fibrillation in this population, and evaluated outcomes of stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding using random-effects models. The main safety outcome was major bleeding, and the main effectiveness outcome was stroke or systemic embolism.
RESULTS
We found five observational studies of 10 036 patients (2638 receiving apixaban, and 7398 receiving warfarin) meeting inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in major bleeding with apixaban as compared to warfarin (odds ratio [OR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.61; < .0001). Apixaban was also associated with a reduction in intracranial bleeding (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.92; = .02) and in gastrointestinal bleeding (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.51-0.73; < .0001). Furthermore, apixaban was associated with a reduction in stroke/systemic embolism (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.82; < .0001).
CONCLUSION
Apixaban was associated with superior outcomes and reduced adverse events compared to warfarin in observational studies of patients with atrial fibrillation on dialysis. Randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 38939758
DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13051 -
American Journal of Preventive... Jun 2024The American Heart Association's (AHA) Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score is a helpful tool to quantify cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics. We sought to assess sex...
BACKGROUND
The American Heart Association's (AHA) Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score is a helpful tool to quantify cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics. We sought to assess sex differences in relation to LE8 and its components along with association with mortality.
METHODS
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 2009 and 2018 was utilized to evaluate the prevalence of health metrics included in LE8 among adult participants > age 18, stratified by sex. We categorized overall CVH, health factors, and health behaviors into 3 levels (low: <50, moderate: 50 -79, high: ≥80) following the AHA's algorithm. Health metrics were further subdivided into health behaviors (diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, and sleep) and health factors (body mass index, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood glucose, and blood pressure). LE8 scores were also evaluated based on age, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between the levels of CVH and risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, with adjustment for age group and race.
RESULTS
Among 22,761 participants, 52 % were female. Overall CVH score was similar in both females and males (65.8 vs. 65.9). Females had higher health factors score (64.3 vs. 63.1, < 0.001) and lower health behaviors score (67.2 vs 68.6, < 0.001). Amongst individual metrics, blood pressure score was higher in females (73.2 vs. 67.7, < 0.001) while males had higher physical activity score (70.6 vs. 54.9, < 0.001). For individuals under 65 years of age, overall CVH and health factors scores were higher in females while in those age 65 or older, males had higher scores. The most prominent sex differences were noted in non-Hispanic Black females who had significantly lower CVH scores than Black males (62.6 vs. 74.7, respectively, < 0.001. High LE8 scores vs. low LE8 scores demonstrated lower all-cause (HR 0.37 vs 0.35) and CV mortality (HR 0.35 vs. 0.36) in both males and females, respectively (p-interaction 0.21 and 0.28). High health behaviors scores also demonstrated a significant association with lower all-cause (0.34 vs. 0.24) and CV mortality (HR 0.47 vs. 0.26) in both males and females, respectively (p-interaction 0.20 and 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrate important sex differences in CVH metrics along with notable variations based on age and race/ethnicity. Furthermore, we highlight that CVH metrics including health factors and health behaviors are associated with mortality in both females and males. These findings underscore the importance of designing and implementing effective strategies for both sexes, aimed at targeting these specific factors.
PubMed: 38939696
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100685 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024Cost-effectiveness of testing for coronary artery calcium (CAC) relative to other treatment strategies is not established in Canada.
BACKGROUND
Cost-effectiveness of testing for coronary artery calcium (CAC) relative to other treatment strategies is not established in Canada.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using CAC score-guided statin treatment compared with universal statin therapy among intermediate-risk, primary prevention patients eligible for statins.
METHODS
A state transition, microsimulation model used data from Canadian sources and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis to simulate clinical and economic consequences of cardiovascular disease from a Canadian publicly funded health care system perspective. In the CAC score-guided treatment arm, statins were started when CAC ≥1. Outcome of interest was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 5 and 10 years; an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was considered cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses examined uncertainty in model parameters.
RESULTS
Compared with universal statin treatment at 5 and 10 years, CAC score-guided statin treatment was projected to increase mean costs by $326 (95% CI: $325-$326) and $172 (95% CI: $169-$175), increase mean QALYs by 0.01 (95% CI: 0.01-0.01) and 0.02 (95% CI: 0.02-0.02), and cost $54,492 (95% CI: $52,342-$56,816) and $8,118 (95% CI: $7,968-$8,279) per QALY gained, respectively. The model was most sensitive to statin cost, CAC testing cost, adherence to statin monitoring, and disutility associated with daily statin use. At 5 years, CAC score-guided statin treatment was cost-effective when CAC test costs ranged from $80 to $160 in different scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS
CAC score-guided statin initiation in comparison to universal statin treatment was borderline cost-neutral at 5 years and cost-effective at 10 years in statin-eligible Canadian patients at intermediate cardiovascular disease risk.
PubMed: 38939688
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100886 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024Statins are highly effective for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Data on the benefit of statins in adults with heart...
BACKGROUND
Statins are highly effective for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and mortality. Data on the benefit of statins in adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and without ASCVD are limited.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to determine whether statins are associated with a lower risk of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in HFpEF.
METHODS
Veterans Health Administration data from 2002 to 2016, linked to Medicare and Medicaid claims and pharmaceutical data, were collected. Patients had a new HFpEF diagnosis and no known ASCVD or prior statin use at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to evaluate the association of new statin use with outcomes (all-cause mortality and MACE). Propensity score overlap weighting (PSW) was used to balance baseline characteristics.
RESULTS
Among 7,970 Veterans, 47% initiated a statin over a mean 6.0-year follow-up. At HFpEF diagnosis, mean age was 69 ± 12 years, 96% were male, 67% were White, 14% were Black, and mean EF was 60% ± 6%. Before PSW, statin users were younger with more prevalent metabolic syndrome, arthritis, and other chronic conditions. All characteristics were balanced after PSW. There were 5,314 deaths and 4,859 MACE events. After PSW, the hazard for all-cause mortality for statin users vs nonusers was 22% lower (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.73-0.83). The HR for MACE was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.74-0.84), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.60-0.80) for all-cause hospitalization, and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.88) for HF hospitalization.
CONCLUSIONS
New statin use was associated with reduced all-cause mortality, MACE, and hospitalization in Veterans with HFpEF without prevalent ASCVD.
PubMed: 38939680
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100869 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024
PubMed: 38939677
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100884 -
JACC. Advances Apr 2024Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes. Currently, available MACE prediction models...
BACKGROUND
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among adults with type 2 diabetes. Currently, available MACE prediction models have important limitations, including reliance on data that may not be routinely available, narrow focus on primary prevention, limited patient populations, and longtime horizons for risk prediction.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to derive and internally validate a claims-based prediction model for 1-year risk of MACE in type 2 diabetes.
METHODS
Using medical and pharmacy claims for adults with type 2 diabetes enrolled in commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicare fee-for-service plans between 2014 and 2021, we derived and internally validated the annualized claims-based MACE estimator (ACME) model to predict the risk of MACE (nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and all-cause mortality). The Cox proportional hazards model was composed of 30 covariates, including patient age, sex, comorbidities, and medications.
RESULTS
The study cohort comprised 6,623,526 adults with type 2 diabetes, mean age 68.1 ± 10.6 years, 49.8% women, and 73.0% Non-Hispanic White. ACME had a concordance index of 0.74 (validation index range: 0.739-0.741). The predicted 1-year risk of the study cohort ranged from 0.4% to 99.9%, with a median risk of 3.4% (IQR: 2.3%-6.5%).
CONCLUSIONS
ACME was derived in a large usual care population, relies on routinely available data, and estimates short-term MACE risk. It can support population risk stratification at the health system and payer levels, participant identification for decentralized clinical trials of cardiovascular disease, and risk-stratified observational studies using real-world data.
PubMed: 38939660
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100852 -
Preventive Cardiology in High-Risk Adolescents and Young Adults: Is the Current Training Sufficient?JACC. Advances May 2024
PubMed: 38939645
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100908 -
International Journal of Public Health 2024The adoption of vaccines was a crucial factor in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. However, vaccination rates between rural and urban areas varied greatly. In this...
OBJETIVES
The adoption of vaccines was a crucial factor in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic. However, vaccination rates between rural and urban areas varied greatly. In this paper, our objective is to understand the individual and institutional factors associated with the uptake of vaccines in remote rural areas in Colombia.
METHODS
We interviewed a random sample of 800 households (1,592 individuals) in remote rural areas of Antioquia (Colombia) during February 2022 when vaccinations were available. Then, we use a linear probability model to explain the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine.
RESULTS
The results indicate that the probability of having at least the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine is positively associated with access to information, trust in police and army, and the perceived risk of contracting COVID-19. Trust in the church is negatively related to vaccination.
CONCLUSION
Institutions can play a critical role in the management of pandemics. Timely information on the risks associated with the disease and perceived riskiness are key factors that mobilize the population to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
Topics: Humans; Colombia; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Rural Population; Female; Male; Adult; Middle Aged; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination; Young Adult; Adolescent; Trust
PubMed: 38939517
DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1606689 -
JACC. Advances Sep 2023In the SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol levels) trial, atorvastatin (80 mg/d) was compared to placebo in patients with recent stroke or...
BACKGROUND
In the SPARCL (Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol levels) trial, atorvastatin (80 mg/d) was compared to placebo in patients with recent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and no known coronary artery disease.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to assess the contribution of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] to subsequent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events in stroke/TIA survivors.
METHODS
Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] isoform size were determined by liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry in samples collected at baseline from 2,814 SPARCL participants (1,418 randomized to atorvastatin and 1,396 to placebo). Within each treatment arm, patients in the highest quartile (≥84.0 nmol/L) were compared with those in the lowest quartiles of Lp(a) concentrations. Patients in the lowest quartile (≤25.9 Kringle IV domains) of apo(a) isoform sizes were compared with those in the highest quartiles. Multivariable-adjusted HRs were calculated using Cox proportional regression models.
RESULTS
There was no significant association between Lp(a) concentrations or apo(a) isoform sizes and the risk of recurrent stroke, the primary outcome of SPARCL, or cerebrovascular events in patients randomized to atorvastatin or placebo. In contrast, in patients randomized to atorvastatin, elevated Lp(a) concentrations and short apo(a) isoforms were positively and independently associated with an increased risk of coronary events (HR: 1.607 [95% CI: 1.007-2.563] and HR: 2.052 [95% CI: 1.303-3.232]). No such association was found in patients randomized to placebo (HR: 1.025 [95% CI: 0.675-1.555] and HR: 1.097 [95% CI: 0.735-1.637]).
CONCLUSIONS
Lp(a) contributes to the residual coronary artery disease risk of statin-treated stroke/TIA survivors, paving the way for use of therapies targeting Lp(a) in this population with stroke. (Lipitor In The Prevention Of Stroke, For Patients Who Have Had A Previous Stroke [SPARCL]; NCT00147602).
PubMed: 38939496
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100557