-
The Quarterly Journal of Nuclear... Jun 2024The aim of this article was to offer a comprehensive non-systematic review of the literature about the use of Nuclear Medicine imaging exams for the evaluation of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this article was to offer a comprehensive non-systematic review of the literature about the use of Nuclear Medicine imaging exams for the evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) in the recurrent setting, with a particular regard to positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A comprehensive nonsystematic literature review was performed in March 2024. Literature search was updated until March 2024. The most relevant studies have been summarized, giving priority to registered clinical trials and multicenter collaborations.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Restaging BCR with advanced Nuclear Medicine Imaging, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/CT could lead to stage migration and pave the way for additional management strategies, such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with low-burden or oligometastatic disease, potentially delaying the need of systemic therapies. While OS benefits of targeting PET/CT positive disease are still lacking, data on progression- and metastasis-free-survival are emerging. Improvements in quality-of-life assessments are already evident.
CONCLUSIONS
PCa is one of the most common malignancy in men. In the last 10 years PCa imaging has become significantly more accurate and is now essential for the definition of the extent of the disease in different phases of its natural history. This opened the road to novel management strategies, especially in the recurrent setting, in which the oligometastatic state is now being explored in several trials regarding the prognostic significance of metastasis directed therapies aimed at personalizing the treatment for every single patient.
Topics: Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms; Male; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nuclear Medicine; Recurrence; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
PubMed: 38860273
DOI: 10.23736/S1824-4785.24.03569-6 -
Acta Neurochirurgica Jun 2024The gold standard for diagnostics in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy. Yet, PCNSL has a... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The gold standard for diagnostics in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy. Yet, PCNSL has a multidisciplinary diagnostic work up, which associated with diagnostic delay and could result in treatment delay. This article offers recommendations to neurosurgeons involved in clinical decision-making regarding (novel) diagnostics and care for patients with PCNSL with the aim to improve uniformity and timeliness of the diagnostic process for patients with PCNSL.
METHODS
We present a mini review to discuss the role of stereotactic biopsy in the context of novel developments in diagnostics for PCNSL, as well as the role for cytoreductive surgery.
RESULTS
Cerebrospinal fluid-based diagnostics are supplementary and cannot replace stereotactic biopsy-based diagnostics.
CONCLUSION
Histopathological diagnosis after stereotactic biopsy of the brain remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Additional diagnostics should not be a cause of diagnostic delay. There is currently no sufficient evidence supporting cytoreductive surgery in PCNSL, with recent studies showing contradictive data and suboptimal study designs.
Topics: Humans; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Lymphoma; Time-to-Treatment; Delayed Diagnosis; Neurosurgeons; Biopsy; Stereotaxic Techniques; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Treatment Delay
PubMed: 38858236
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-024-06138-3 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Jun 2024
PubMed: 38857703
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110378 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... Jun 2024Outcomes for pineal region and superior cerebellar tumors in young children often hinge on extent of microsurgical resection, and thus choosing an approach that provides...
INTRODUCTION
Outcomes for pineal region and superior cerebellar tumors in young children often hinge on extent of microsurgical resection, and thus choosing an approach that provides adequate visualization of pathology is essential. The occipital interhemispheric transtentorial (OITT) approach provides excellent exposure while minimizing cerebellar retraction. However, this approach has not been widely accepted as a viable option for very young children due to concerns for potential blood loss when incising the tentorium. The aim of this paper is to characterize our recent institutional experience with the occipital interhemispheric transtentorial approach (OITT) for tumor resection in infants and toddlers.
METHODS
A retrospective study was performed between 2016 and 2023 of pediatric patients less than 36 months of age who underwent OITT for tumor resection at a high-volume referral center. Patients with at least 3 months of postoperative follow-up and postoperative MRI were included. Primary outcomes included extent of resection, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and neurologic outcome. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and estimated blood loss.
RESULTS
Eight patients, five male, were included. The median age at the time of surgery was 10 months (range 5-36 months). Presenting symptoms included macrocephaly, nausea/vomiting, strabismus, gait instability, or milestone regression. Hydrocephalus was present preoperatively in all patients. Average tumor volume was 38.6 cm, ranging from 1.3 to 71.9 cm. All patients underwent an OITT approach for tumor resection with stereotactic guidance. No intraoperative complications occurred, and no permanent neurologic deficits developed postoperatively. Gross total resection was achieved in all cases per postoperative MRI report, and no instances of new cerebellar, brainstem, or occipital lobe ischemia were noted.
CONCLUSIONS
OITT approach for tumor resection in very young children (≤ 36 months) is an effective strategy with an acceptable safety profile. In our series, no significant intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing this technique specifically in patients less than 36 months of age.
PubMed: 38856743
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06475-9 -
Translational Lung Cancer Research May 2024rearrangements are infrequently observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Advanced genomic detection techniques have unveiled such infrequent genomic variations,...
BACKGROUND
rearrangements are infrequently observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Advanced genomic detection techniques have unveiled such infrequent genomic variations, particularly fusions in approximately 0.5% of NSCLC patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the standard of care in lung cancer and more recently a second generation MET TKI tepotinib received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for MET exon 14 alterations in metastatic NSCLC. Despite this, the therapeutic landscape for -rearranged NSCLC patients remains significantly unexplored. The aim of our report is to detail a unique case of a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with a novel fusion detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS) following previous treatment resistance.
CASE DESCRIPTION
A 73-year-old female was initially started on carboplatin, pemetrexed and pembrolizumab with maintenance, but eventually had progression in the left upper lobe (LUL). Upon progression she was enrolled in a clinical trial of a monoclonal antibody with or without a PD-1 inhibitor, but brain metastasis progression was eventually detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) requiring stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and a craniotomy. The trial drug was eventually discontinued due to progression and toxicity and NGS on bronchoscopy tissue revealed fusion. The patient was initiated on tepotinib and continues with clinical and radiological stable disease for over 12 months. The patient's response to a MET inhibitor, tepotinib, underscores the potential efficacy of selective MET inhibitors for individuals with previously unexplored fusions.
CONCLUSIONS
The positive response to tepotinib of a patient with NSCLC harboring a novel -Fusion underscores the importance of the use of comprehensive next-generational sequencing-based panels and highlights the necessity for additional research and clinical exploration of selective MET inhibitors for managing NSCLC with rearrangements.
PubMed: 38854944
DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-34 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024The standard of care for non-metastatic renal cancer is surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapy for those at high risk for recurrences. However, for older...
Immunotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for older patients with non-metastatic renal cancer unfit for surgery or decline nephrectomy: practical proposal by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group.
The standard of care for non-metastatic renal cancer is surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapy for those at high risk for recurrences. However, for older patients, surgery may not be an option due to the high risk of complications which may result in death. In the past renal cancer was considered to be radio-resistant, and required a higher dose of radiation leading to excessive complications secondary to damage of the normal organs surrounding the cancer. Advances in radiotherapy technique such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has led to the delivery of a tumoricidal dose of radiation with minimal damage to the normal tissue. Excellent local control and survival have been reported for selective patients with small tumors following SBRT. However, for patients with poor prognostic factors such as large tumor size and aggressive histology, there was a higher rate of loco-regional recurrences and distant metastases. Those tumors frequently carry program death ligand 1 (PD-L1) which makes them an ideal target for immunotherapy with check point inhibitors (CPI). Given the synergy between radiotherapy and immunotherapy, we propose an algorithm combining CPI and SBRT for older patients with non-metastatic renal cancer who are not candidates for surgical resection or decline nephrectomy.
PubMed: 38854736
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1391464 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024Bulky tumor remains as a challenge to surgery, chemotherapy and conventional radiation therapy. Hence, in efforts to overcome this challenge, we designed a novel...
PURPOSE
Bulky tumor remains as a challenge to surgery, chemotherapy and conventional radiation therapy. Hence, in efforts to overcome this challenge, we designed a novel therapeutic paradigm via strategy of Stereotactic Central/Core Ablative Radiation Therapy (SCART).), which is based on the principles of SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy and spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT). We intend to safely deliver an ablative dose to the core of the tumor and with a low dose at tumor edge. The purpose of the phase 1 study was to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)s and the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of SCART.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
We defined a SCART-plan volume inside the tumor, which is proportional to the dimension of tumor. VMAT/Cyberknife technique was adopted. In the current clinical trial; Patients with biopsy proven recurrent or metastatic bulky cancers were enrolled. The five dose levels were 15 Gy X1, 15Gy X3, 18GyX3, 21GyX3 and 24GyX3, while keeping the whole tumor GTV's border dose at 5Gy each fraction. There was no restriction on concurrent systemic chemotherapy agents.
RESULTS
21 patients were enrolled and underwent SCART. All 21 patients have eligible data for study follow-up. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with all treatment completed as scheduled. The dose was escalated for two patients to 24GyX3. No grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in any of the enrolled patients. The average age of patients was 66 years (range: 1485) and 13 (62%) patients were male. The median SCART dose was 18Gy (range: 15 - 24). Six out of the 18 patients with data for overall survival (OS) died, and the median time to death was 16.3 months (range: 1 - 25.6). The mean percent change for tumor shrinkage between first visit volumes and post-SCART volumes was 49.5% (SD: 40.89, p-value:0.009).
CONCLUSION
SCART was safely escalated to 24 GyX 3 fractions, which is the maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for SCART. This regimen will be used in future phase II trials.
PubMed: 38854732
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1364627 -
Recenti Progressi in Medicina Jun 2024The higher frequency of metastasization and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer require suitable expertise in order to set up an appropriate and effective...
The higher frequency of metastasization and poor prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer require suitable expertise in order to set up an appropriate and effective treatment plan for these patients. Our case describes the clinical history of a 63-year-old BRCA1/2 wild-type woman with excellent ECOG performance status and advanced PD-L1 negative breast cancer with brain, nodal and hepatic metastases. When occurred the brain progression within one year from neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a locally advanced tumor, the patient was treated with brain stereotaxis and a systemic platinum-based therapy that was not completed due to poor tolerance. Later instrumental examinations confirmed a new systemic and visceral progression, for which the patient underwent new therapy with sacituzumab govitecan (SG). During this treatment, we observed a reduction of the target liver and nodal lesions. The onset after several months of two very small cortico-subcortical metastases, on which stereotactic radiotherapy was performed, did not lead us to discontinuate the treatment, that was ongoing for another six months, with an excellent control both of brain and systemic disease without any symptoms, until a new disease progression at other sites requiring a therapeutic change. The use of antibody-drug conjugates allowed a significant prolongation of time to progression and overall survival in our clinical scenario characterized by poor prognosis due to early recurrence and brain involvement.
Topics: Humans; Middle Aged; Female; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Brain Neoplasms; Camptothecin; Immunoconjugates; Time Factors; Disease Progression; Liver Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38853740
DOI: 10.1701/4274.42537 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024The detection rate of ground glass nodules (GGNs) has increased in recent years because of their malignant potential but relatively indolent biological behavior; thus,... (Review)
Review
The detection rate of ground glass nodules (GGNs) has increased in recent years because of their malignant potential but relatively indolent biological behavior; thus, correct GGN recognition and management has become a research focus. Many scholars have explored the underlying mechanism of the indolent progression of GGNs from several perspectives, such as pathological type, genomic mutational characteristics, and immune microenvironment. GGNs have different major mutated genes at different stages of development; mutation is the most common mutation in GGNs, and mutation is the most abundant mutation in the invasive stage of GGNs. Pure GGNs have fewer genomic alterations and a simpler genomic profile and exhibit a gradually evolving genomic mutation profile as the pathology progresses. Compared to advanced lung adenocarcinoma, GGN lung adenocarcinoma has a higher immune cell percentage, is under immune surveillance, and has less immune escape. However, as the pathological progression and solid component increase, negative immune regulation and immune escape increase gradually, and a suppressive immune environment is established gradually. Currently, regular computer tomography monitoring and surgery are the main treatment strategies for persistent GGNs. Stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation are two local therapeutic alternatives, and systemic therapy has been progressively studied for lung cancer with GGNs. In the present review, we discuss the characterization of the multidimensional molecular evolution of GGNs that could facilitate more precise differentiation of such highly heterogeneous lesions, laying a foundation for the development of more effective individualized treatment plans.
PubMed: 38841161
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1380527 -
Surgical Neurology International 2024Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive neoplasms recognized as derivatives of the notochord vestiges. These tumors typically involve the midline axial skeleton, and...
BACKGROUND
Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive neoplasms recognized as derivatives of the notochord vestiges. These tumors typically involve the midline axial skeleton, and intracranial chordomas exhibit proclivity for the spheno-occipital region. However, purely intrasellar occurrences are extremely rare. We report a case of intrasellar chordoma, which masqueraded as a pituitary neuroendocrine tumor.
CASE DESCRIPTION
An 87-year-old female presented with an acutely altered mental state after a few-week course of headaches and decreased left vision. Adrenal insufficiency was evident, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an intrasellar lesion with heterogeneous contrast enhancement and marked T2 hyperintensity. Central adrenal insufficiency due to an intrasellar lesion was suspected. Cortisol replacement was initiated, and transsphenoidal surgery was performed. Anterosuperior displacement of the normal pituitary gland and the absence of the bony dorsum sellae were notable during the procedure. Histological examination led to a diagnosis of conventional chordoma, and upfront adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery was executed. She has been free from tumor progression for 12 months.
CONCLUSION
This case and literature review suggested that the pathognomonic features of intrasellar chordoma were heterogeneous contrast enhancement, marked T2 hyperintensity, osteolytic destruction of the dorsum sellae, and anterosuperior displacement of the pituitary gland. Clinical outcomes seemed slightly worse than those of all skull base chordomas, which were the rationale for upfront radiosurgery in our case. Neurosurgeons should include intrasellar chordomas in the differential diagnosis of intrasellar lesions, carefully dissect them from the adjacent critical anatomical structures, and consider upfront radiosurgery to achieve optimal patient outcomes.
PubMed: 38840611
DOI: 10.25259/SNI_116_2024