-
Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) Jan 2024Powered ankle prostheses have been proven to improve the walking economy of people with transtibial amputation. All commercial powered ankle prostheses that are...
Powered ankle prostheses have been proven to improve the walking economy of people with transtibial amputation. All commercial powered ankle prostheses that are currently available can only perform one-degree-of-freedom motion in a limited range. However, studies have shown that the frontal plane motion during ambulation is associated with balancing. In addition, as more advanced neural interfaces have become available for people with amputation, it is possible to fully recover ankle function by combining neural signals and a robotic ankle. Accordingly, there is a need for a powered ankle prosthesis that can have active control on not only plantarflexion and dorsiflexion but also eversion and inversion. We designed, built, and evaluated a two-degree-of-freedom (2-DoF) powered ankle-foot prosthesis that is untethered and can support level-ground walking. Benchtop tests were conducted to characterize the dynamics of the system. Walking trials were performed with a 77 kg subject that has unilateral transtibial amputation to evaluate system performance under realistic conditions. Benchtop tests demonstrated a step response rise time of less than 50 milliseconds for a torque of 40 N·m on each actuator. The closed-loop torque bandwidth of the actuator is 9.74 Hz. Walking trials demonstrated torque tracking errors (root mean square) of less than 7 N·m. These results suggested that the device can perform adequate torque control and support level-ground walking. This prosthesis can serve as a platform for studying biomechanics related to balance and has the possibility of further recovering the biological function of the ankle-subtalar-foot complex beyond the existing powered ankles.
PubMed: 38392122
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9020076 -
Foot and Ankle Surgery : Official... Jun 2024Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is frequently performed by foot and ankle surgeons in the management of complex ankle and hindfoot pathology. In this study, the authors...
BACKGROUND
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is frequently performed by foot and ankle surgeons in the management of complex ankle and hindfoot pathology. In this study, the authors describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a solid posterior offset hindfoot arthrodesis nail.
METHODS
Forty-four consecutive patients underwent tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis by a single surgeon operating in two centers. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 6-month, 12-month and final follow-up (mean 47 months). Clinical outcomes were assessed with VAS, AOFAS and MOXFQ scores. Serial radiographs were used to assess union at each follow-up visit.
RESULTS
Forty-four patients attended 12-month and final follow-up (mean 47 months). A total of 44 (100%) ankle joints and 44 (100%) subtalar joints were completely united at 12-month follow-up. The VAS score improved significantly from a mean of 6.5 preoperatively to a mean of 0.98 at final follow-up (P = <0.0001). AOFAS score improved significantly from a mean of 36.4 preoperatively to a mean of 73 at final follow-up (P = <0.0001). MOXFQ score improved significantly from a mean of 44.5 preoperatively to a mean of 12.7 at final follow-up (P = <0.0001). The mean change in frontal plane alignment was 5.7 degrees (P = 0.005). A total of 6 patients (13.6%) had an adverse event during the course of the study.
CONCLUSIONS
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a solid posterior offset hindfoot arthrodesis nail is a safe and effective surgical option for patients with severe ankle and hindfoot pathology. It has a high union rate, low complication rate and significantly improves clinical outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Arthrodesis; Male; Female; Middle Aged; Bone Nails; Follow-Up Studies; Aged; Ankle Joint; Adult; Subtalar Joint; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Radiography
PubMed: 38309988
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.01.007 -
Foot and Ankle Clinics Mar 2024The debate between ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement for patients with end-stage arthritis of the ankle joint is an ongoing topic in orthopedic surgery.... (Review)
Review
The debate between ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement for patients with end-stage arthritis of the ankle joint is an ongoing topic in orthopedic surgery. Ankle arthrodesis, or fusion, has been the traditional treatment for ankle arthritis. It involves fusing the bones of the ankle joint together, eliminating the joint and creating a solid bony union. Arthrodesis is effective in reducing pain in the ankle, but it results in a loss of ankle motion. This can increase the load on adjacent joints, such as the subtalar joint, which may lead to accelerated degeneration and arthritis in those joints over time.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Treatment Outcome; Ankle Joint; Ankle; Arthritis; Subtalar Joint; Arthrodesis; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 38309799
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2023.08.007 -
The American Journal of Sports Medicine Mar 2024Previous studies have examined patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) undergoing open and arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL)...
Evaluation of Open Versus Arthroscopic Anterior Talofibular Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability With Talar and Subtalar Cartilage MRI T2 Mapping: A 3-Year Prospective Study.
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have examined patients with chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI) undergoing open and arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) reconstruction, reporting equivalent clinical results between the 2 procedures. However, data on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes on cartilage health after the 2 procedures are limited.
PURPOSE
To compare the cartilage MRI T2 values of the talar and subtalar joints between patients with CLAI undergoing open and arthroscopic ATFL reconstruction.
STUDY DESIGN
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
A prospective study was conducted on patients who underwent open or arthroscopic ATFL reconstruction between January 2018 and December 2019, with a mean follow-up duration of 3 years. MRI scans and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Tegner score estimations were completed by patients ≤1 week before surgery, as a baseline measurement, and at a 3-year follow-up. A total of 21 healthy volunteers were included who underwent MRI at baseline. Cartilage health was evaluated using MRI T2 mapping. The talar and subtalar cartilage regions were segmented into 14 subregions.
RESULTS
At baseline, patients with CLAI had substantially higher T2 values in the medial anterior, medial center, medial posterior, and lateral center regions on the talus compared with the healthy controls ( = .009, .003, .001, and .025, respectively). Remarkable increases in T2 values in the lateral posterior region on the talus were observed from baseline to follow-up in the open group ( = .007). Furthermore, T2 values were considerably higher in the medial center, medial posterior, lateral posterior, and lateral posterior calcaneal facets of the posterior subtalar joint at follow-up in the arthroscopic group compared with the baseline values ( = .025, .002, .006, and .044, respectively). No obvious differences in ΔT2 values were noted between the 2 groups at follow-up. The AOFAS and Tegner scores remarkably improved from baseline to follow-up for the 2 groups (open: 3.25 ± 0.58 vs 5.13 ± 0.81, < .001; arthroscopic: 3.11 ± 0.90 vs 5.11 ± 1.08, < .001), with no considerable difference between them.
CONCLUSION
The elevated T2 values of cartilage could not be fully recovered after open or arthroscopic ATFL reconstruction. Both arthroscopic and open ATFL reconstruction displayed similar effects on cartilage health concerning ΔT2, but the arthroscopic group demonstrated more degenerative cartilage subregions than the open group.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Joint; Prospective Studies; Ankle; Cohort Studies; Lateral Ligament, Ankle; Cartilage; Joint Instability; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Retrospective Studies; Arthroscopy
PubMed: 38305002
DOI: 10.1177/03635465231222931 -
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Feb 2024To evaluate the degree of deformation in patients with ankle osteoarthritis (OA), it is essential to measure the three-dimensional (3D), in other words, stereoscopic...
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the degree of deformation in patients with ankle osteoarthritis (OA), it is essential to measure the three-dimensional (3D), in other words, stereoscopic alignment of the ankle, subtalar, and foot arches. Generally, measurement of radiological parameters use two-dimensional (2D) anteroposterior and lateral radiographs in a weight-bearing state; however, computer-aided 3D analysis (Disior) using weight-bearing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has recently been introduced.
METHODS
In this study, we compared the 2D human radiographic method with a stereoscopic image in patients with ankle arthritis. We enrolled 57 patients diagnosed with OA (28 left and 29 right) and obtained both standing radiographs and weight-bearing CBCT. Patients were divided by the Takakura stage. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for each result was confirmed.
RESULTS
On the ICC between 2D radiographs and 3D analysis, the tibiotalar surface angle and lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle showed a good ICC grade (> 0.6), while other parameters did not have significant ICC results. Three-dimension was superior to radiographs in terms of statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrated that 2D and stereoscopic images are useful for the diagnosis of OA. Our study also confirmed that the radiographic features affected by ankle OA varied. However, according to the results, the typical radiography is not sufficient to diagnose and determine a treatment plan for ankle OA. Therefore, the method of using 3D images should be considered.
Topics: Humans; Ankle; Radiography; Ankle Joint; Osteoarthritis; Weight-Bearing; Computers; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 38304214
DOI: 10.4055/cios23221 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Feb 2024Evans and Hintermann lateral column lengthening (LCL) procedures are both widely used to correct adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), and have both shown good...
BACKGROUND
Evans and Hintermann lateral column lengthening (LCL) procedures are both widely used to correct adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD), and have both shown good clinical results. The aim of this study was to compare these two procedures in terms of corrective ability and biomechanics influence on the Chopart and subtalar joints through finite element (FE) analysis.
METHODS
Twelve patient-specific FE models were established and validated. The Hintermann osteotomy was performed between the medial and posterior facets of the subtalar joint; while, the Evans osteotomy was performed on the anterior neck of the calcaneus around 10 mm from the calcaneocuboid joint surface. In each procedure, a triangular wedge of varying size was inserted at the lateral edge. The two procedures were then compared based on the measured strains of superomedial calcaneonavicular ligaments and planter facia, the talus-first metatarsal angle, and the contact characteristics of talonavicular, calcaneocuboid and subtalar joints.
RESULTS
The Hintermann procedure achieved a greater correction of the talus-first metatarsal angle than Evans when using grafts of the same size, indicating that Hintermann had stronger corrective ability. However, its distributions of von-Mises stress in the subtalar, talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints were less homogeneous than those of Evans. In addition, the strains of superomedial calcaneonavicular ligaments and planter facia of Hintermann were also greater than those of Evans, but both generally within the safe range (less than 6%).
CONCLUSION
This FE analysis study indicates that both Evans and Hintermann procedures have good corrective ability for AAFD. Compared to Evans, Hintermann procedure can provide a stronger corrective effect while causing greater disturbance to the biomechanics of Chopart joints, which may be an important mechanism of arthritis. Nevertheless, it yields a better protection to the subtalar joint than Evans osteotomy.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Both Evans and Hintermann LCL surgeries have a considerable impact on adjacent joints and ligament tissues. Such effects alongside the overcorrection problem should be cautiously considered when choosing the specific surgical method.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, case-control study.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Flatfoot; Case-Control Studies; Finite Element Analysis; Calcaneus; Osteotomy
PubMed: 38303071
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04584-4 -
Computers in Biology and Medicine Mar 2024The ankle joint plays a crucial role in gait, facilitating the articulation of the lower limb, maintaining foot-ground contact, balancing the body, and transmitting the...
The ankle joint plays a crucial role in gait, facilitating the articulation of the lower limb, maintaining foot-ground contact, balancing the body, and transmitting the center of gravity. This study aimed to implement long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for predicting ankle joint angles, torques, and contact forces using inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors. Twenty-five healthy participants were recruited. Two IMU sensors were attached to the foot dorsum and the vertical axis of the distal anteromedial tibia in the right lower limb to record acceleration and angular velocity during running. We proposed a LSTM-MLP (multilayer perceptron) model for training time-series data from IMU sensors and predicting ankle joint biomechanics. The model underwent validation and testing using a custom nested k-fold cross-validation process. The average values of the coefficient of determination (R), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean squared error (MSE) for ankle dorsiflexion joint and moment, subtalar inversion joint and moment, and ankle joint contact forces were 0.89 ± 0.04, 0.75 ± 1.04, and 2.96 ± 4.96 for walking, and 0.87 ± 0.07, 0.88 ± 1.26, and 4.1 ± 7.17 for running, respectively. This study demonstrates that IMU sensors, combined with LSTM neural networks, are invaluable tools for evaluating ankle joint biomechanics in lower limb pathological diagnosis and rehabilitation, offering a cost-effective and versatile alternative to traditional experimental settings.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Joint; Biomechanical Phenomena; Gait; Walking; Foot
PubMed: 38277923
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108016 -
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques 2023Talar arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (TARIF) is an alternative approach for the operative fixation of talar fractures that may be utilized instead of more...
BACKGROUND
Talar arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (TARIF) is an alternative approach for the operative fixation of talar fractures that may be utilized instead of more traditional open approaches such as medial, lateral, or even dual anterolateral. The TARIF approach allows for nearly anatomic fracture reduction and fixation of talar neck, body, and posterior dome fractures while minimizing the soft-tissue stripping and vascular injury associated with the standard anterolateral approach.
DESCRIPTION
Following initial closed fracture reduction and any associated procedures, we recommend obtaining computed tomography scans of the injured ankle in order to evaluate the fracture pattern and allow for preoperative planning. Most patients can be positioned prone for this procedure, except for those with fractures associated with anterior loose bodies and those with neck fractures requiring reduction, which are both amenable to lateral positioning. The feet are positioned off the end of the bed in a neutral position with room to plantar flex and dorsiflex the ankle freely for reduction maneuvers. Following induction of anesthesia and positioning of the patient, the fluoroscopic screen and arthroscopy equipment are positioned on the side opposite the surgeon. A mini C-arm is utilized for the fluoroscopy. The team may then proceed with preparing and draping the surgical field. The surgeon proceeds with creating posteromedial and posterolateral portals to view the fracture site. For talar neck fractures, we utilize standard posterolateral and posteromedial portals directly adjacent to the Achilles tendon at the level of the tip of the medial malleolus, which have previously been established as safe with respect to neurovascular structures. Of note, for talar body fractures these portals are placed slightly more distal at the level of the distal fibula, allowing the screws to be placed perpendicular to the fracture site. An accessory sinus tarsi portal can be established if further reduction to correct varus is needed. The flexor hallucis longus tendon serves as a landmark throughout the case to maintain orientation. We prefer to utilize a 1.9-mm malleable arthroscopic NanoScope (Arthrex), which maximizes our view in the small subtalar space and allows for visualization over the talar dome. A shaver is then utilized to clear out the deep joint capsule and remove fracture hematoma. In our experience, after the initial primary reduction attempt by the orthopaedic trauma provider, the fracture is relatively stable and often held by an external fixator. The remaining reduction is performed with use of manipulation of the ankle in combination with an accessory sinus tarsi portal, utilizing an elevator or a small reduction tool in 1 of the posterior portals. We have also utilized percutaneous Kirschner wires to "joystick" the fragments prior to the placement of the guidewires. We then place multiple 1.1-mm guidewires under direct arthroscopic and fluoroscopic visualization, utilizing the flexor hallucis longus tendon as our safe margin to ensure that we are lateral on the posterior talar dome. This approach in turn allows us to ensure the integrity of the neurovascular structures, such as the tibial artery and nerve medially as well as the sural nerve laterally. Finally, cannulated headless compression screws are passed over the guidewire to achieve fixation. The senior author (K.D.M.) prefers fully threaded, cannulated 3.5-mm titanium headless compression screws because the cannulation allows the guidewires to be placed through the posterolateral and posteromedial portals, while the headless design allows the screws to be placed under the articular cartilage. Additionally, the use of titanium allows for improved postoperative magnetic resonance imaging quality as well as favorable biomechanics as titanium has a modulus of elasticity similar to bone. After drilling is complete, we sequentially tighten the screws by hand to prevent varus or valgus angulation. Although we have not experienced failure or a poor bite when utilizing the 3.5-mm fully threaded compression screw, we have found that the partially threaded screw can at times have a poorer bite. Additionally, we select a 3.5-mm screw rather than a larger screw-say 5.5 mm-as we have found that the larger screws do not easily pass through our portals, which are minimal in size when utilizing this approach. Throughout this process, fluoroscopy, in tandem with arthroscopy, is obtained in multiple views to ensure that fixation and orientation are appropriate and the screws are in the optimal position, off of the articular surface. If large osseous defects or collapse are encountered, an accessory anteromedial portal is utilized to add grafting material. Following confirmation of adequate fracture fixation, final arthroscopic images of the talar dome continuity, subtalar continuity, and ankle joint during range of motion are obtained. The portal sites are closed with use of 3-0 nonabsorbable sutures, and a well-padded L and U splint is applied postoperatively.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives include the standard anterolateral approach to fixation or dual anterior approach, a medial or lateral approach, and external fixation with interval operative fixation.
RATIONALE
TARIF is indicated for reduction of a wide variety of talar fractures, including neck, body, and posterior facet fractures, and offers the added advantage of minimizing the soft-tissue stripping and vascular injury associated with the standard anterolateral approach. Additionally, TARIF is well suited for patients with a compromised soft-tissue envelope or associated vascular injury, such as those with open-fracture pathology, because the approach avoids further disruption of these tissues. The overall aim of the procedure is to obtain adequate fracture reduction while avoiding the neurovasculature and soft-tissue envelope that would commonly be encountered anteriorly. The procedure is completed through 2 incisions, a posteromedial portal and a posterolateral portal, through which the fracture is visualized, reduced, and fixated using cannulated screws. The fixated talus is tested through its range of motion while under arthroscopy and fluoroscopy to ensure adequate fixation while preserving range of motion.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES
The TARIF procedure has been shown to successfully treat many complex talar fractures. We theorize that this procedure produces equivalent outcomes when compared with the standard approaches to fracture fixation, with the added benefit of avoiding excessive soft-tissue disruption and neurovascular compromise. Our arthroscopic approach allows for direct visualization of articular injuries and reduction, with the ability to evacuate loose bodies and fracture hematoma, reducing matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) known to cause posttraumatic ankle arthritis. Multiple case series have assessed the use of this technique, showing preserved range of motion and minimal residual pain or disability, as measured with use of multiple scoring systems such as the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot scale.
IMPORTANT TIPS
Immediately after accessing the ankle via the operative portals, identify the flexor hallucis longus tendon to prevent iatrogenic injury to the neurovascular bundle.Plantar flexion of the ankle while applying anterior force to the talar body often aids in reduction.Place the medial guidewire directly adjacent to the flexor hallucis tendon in order to ensure that it is medial enough.Utilize anterior-to-posterior fluoroscopic images of the foot and ankle to ensure screw placement.Directly visualize the fracture site as the screws are sequentially tightened in order to prevent malalignment.Countersink all screw heads and directly verify with arthroscopic visualization.
ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS
MVC = motor vehicle collisionXR = x-ray (radiograph)CT = computed tomographyEx-fix = external fixatorMRI = magnetic resonance imagingFT = fully threadedFHL = flexor hallucis longusAP = anteroposteriorROM = range of motionDVT = deep vein thrombosisBID = bis in die (twice daily dosing).
PubMed: 38274280
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00007 -
JBJS Essential Surgical Techniques 2023In patients with irreparable damage to the articular surfaces of the hindfoot, hindfoot arthrodesis is frequently chosen to provide pain relief and improve activities of...
BACKGROUND
In patients with irreparable damage to the articular surfaces of the hindfoot, hindfoot arthrodesis is frequently chosen to provide pain relief and improve activities of daily living. Common etiologies leading to hindfoot arthrodesis procedures include osteonecrosis, failed total ankle arthroplasty, and deformities resulting from Charcot arthropathy or rheumatoid arthritis. Traditionally, this operation utilizes an intramedullary nail to obtain fusion of the tibiotalocalcaneal joint. Although 80% to 90% of patients achieve postoperative union, the remaining 10% to 20% experience nonunion. Factors affecting the rate of nonunion include Charcot neuroarthropathy, use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or methotrexate, osteopenic bone, and smoking. In the present video article, we describe a tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis performed with use of a fibular strut autograft for repeat arthrodesis following failure of primary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis or as a salvage operation in end-stage pathologies of the hindfoot. Our surgical technique yields union rates of approximately 80% and provides surgeons with a viable surgical technique for patients with complex hindfoot pathologies or fusion failure.
DESCRIPTION
The patient is placed in the supine position, and a 10-cm curvilinear incision is made including the distal 6 to 8 cm of the fibula. The incision is centered directly lateral on the fibula proximally and transitions to the posterolateral aspect of the fibula distally. As the incision continues distally, it extends inferiorly and anteriorly over the sinus tarsi and toward the base of the 4th metatarsal, using an internervous plane between the superficial peroneal nerve anteriorly and the sural nerve posteriorly. Exposure of the periosteum is carried out through development of full-thickness skin flaps. The periosteum is stripped, and a sagittal saw is used to make a beveled cut on the fibula at a 45° angle, approximately 6 to 8 cm proximal to the ankle. The fibular strut is decorticated, drilled, and stripped of the cartilage on the distal end. Preparation of the tibiotalar and subtalar joints for arthrodesis are completed through the lateral incision. The foot is placed in 0° of dorsiflexion, 5° of external rotation in relation to the tibial crest, and 5° of hindfoot valgus while maintaining a plantigrade foot. This placement can be temporarily maintained with Kirschner wires if needed. Next, the plantar surface overlying the heel pad is incised, and a guidewire is passed through the center of the calcaneus and into the medullary cavity of the tibia. Correct alignment of the guidewire is then confirmed on fluoroscopy. The fibular strut autograft is prepared for insertion while the tibiotalocalcaneal canal is reamed to 1 to 2 mm larger than the graft. The graft is tapped into position, followed by placement of two 6.5-mm cancellous screws to immobilize the joint, taking care to avoid excess contact of the fibular graft with the screws.
ALTERNATIVES
Alternatives to this procedure include traditional arthrodesis techniques, nonoperative treatment (such as rehabilitation or bracing), or no intervention. Patients with failed primary hindfoot arthrodesis may undergo an additional traditional arthrodesis, but may face an increased risk of complications and failure.
RATIONALE
A recent study has shown that the use of a fibular strut autograft for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis produces union rates similar to those seen with the traditional intramedullary nailing technique. These results are important to note, as the presently described technique, which is used as a salvage procedure, produces outcomes that are equivalent to those observed for primary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with nailing, which is used for the treatment of severe trauma, extensive bone loss, or severe hindfoot pathologies. We recommend using this technique particularly in cases of failed primary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis or in patients with end-stage hindfoot pathologies. The fibular strut autograft is a viable salvage option to decrease daily pain and provide quality improvement in patient activities of daily living.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES
Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a fibular strut autograft has been shown to produce a union rate (81.2%) similar to that of the traditional arthrodesis technique with intramedullary nailing (74.4% to 90%). The strut graft provides an osteoinductive environment for healing and increases the post-arthrodesis load tolerance. Mean visual analog scale pain scores improved from 6.9 preoperatively to 1.2 postoperatively with use of this procedure. The most common complication was wound dehiscence requiring additional wound care (37.5%); its rate was higher than the rates reported in other studies of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, possibly because of the small sample size of patients undergoing such a complex procedure for a complex medical issue. Although 7 patients required a reoperation, all ultimately experienced a union and recovered postoperatively. All non-retired patients were all able to return to work.
IMPORTANT TIPS
Place your incision precisely to allow adequate exposure of both the tibiotalar and subtalar joints.Curvilinear incision should begin 6 to 8 cm proximal to, and directly lateral to, the distal end of the fibula. It should continue posterolaterally to the fibula distally and extend inferiorly and anteriorly over the sinus tarsi, toward the base of the 4th metatarsal.Prepare the tibiotalar and subtalar joints this same incision.Decorticate the fibular strut autograft; this plays a key role in obtaining fusion.Harvest the fibula 6 to 8 cm above the ankle joint line. Once the graft is harvested, smooth the edges of the fibula with a burr; this facilitates graft insertion.Finally, when immobilizing the joint, take care to avoid excessive perforation of the graft as this increases the likelihood of fracture.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
OR = operating roomIM = intramedullaryCT = computed tomographyTTCA = tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesisTTC = tibiotalocalcanealK-wire - Kirschner wire.
PubMed: 38274151
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.22.00004