-
Bone Marrow Transplantation Jun 2023The optimal reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen is a matter of debate. We retrospectively compared conditioning with fludarabine plus fractionated total body...
Fludarabine/TBI 8 Gy versus fludarabine/treosulfan conditioning in patients with AML in first complete remission: a study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.
The optimal reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen is a matter of debate. We retrospectively compared conditioning with fludarabine plus fractionated total body irradiation of 8 Gy (FluTBI) and fludarabine plus treosulfan 30, 36 or 42 g/m (FluTreo) in 754 patients with AML above the age of 40 years undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in first complete remission (CR). After balancing patient characteristics by propensity score matching of 115 patients in each group, FluTBI was associated with a significantly lower probability of relapse compared to FluTreo (18.3% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.018) which was counteracted by a higher non-relapse mortality (NRM, 16.8% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.02). Thus, overall survival and graft-versus-host disease-free and relapse-free survival at 2 years were similar between groups (OS 66.9% vs. 67.8%, GRFS 50.3% vs. 45.6%). Univariate analysis by age group demonstrated a higher NRM exclusively in patients ≥55 years of age treated with FluTBI compared to FluTreo (27.6% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.02), while a similarly low NRM was observed in patients <55 years in both groups (6.0% vs. 4.7%, p = ns). We conclude that both conditioning regimens are effective and safe, but FluTBI may better be reserved for younger patients below the age of 55 years.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Whole-Body Irradiation; Busulfan; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Acute Disease; Vidarabine; Recurrence; Transplantation Conditioning; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Graft vs Host Disease
PubMed: 37002412
DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-01965-x -
Experimental and Clinical... Mar 2023Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is potentially curative for relapsed/refractory leukemia. However, neurotoxicity is common and has been reported in 11% to 59% of...
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is potentially curative for relapsed/refractory leukemia. However, neurotoxicity is common and has been reported in 11% to 59% of children following hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Most pediatric studies of the neurological effects of hematopoietic stem cell transplant have focused on acute neurotoxicity. Limited information is available for long-term neurotoxicity, particularly those cases that are severe and permanent and caused by conditioning chemotherapy. Here, we report 2 cases of relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia that achieved long-term remission by haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplant but remained complicated with severe and persistent fludarabine-induced neurotoxicity.
Topics: Humans; Child; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Vidarabine; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Transplants; Transplantation Conditioning
PubMed: 36987804
DOI: 10.6002/ect.2022.0383 -
The Journal of Evidence-based Dental... Mar 2023To compare the relative efficacy and safety of antiviral agents used in the prevention and management of herpes labialis through a network meta-analysis of clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To compare the relative efficacy and safety of antiviral agents used in the prevention and management of herpes labialis through a network meta-analysis of clinical trials.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in Ovid Medline PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus and Clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting a comparison of antiviral agents in the management and prevention of herpes labialis in healthy/immunocompetent adults. The data extracted from the selected RCTs were assessed and a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed. The interventions were ranked according to the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA).
RESULTS
A total of 52 articles were included for qualitative synthesis and for the quantitative part, 26 articles were analyzed for the primary treatment outcome and 7 studies were analyzed for the primary prevention outcome. The combination therapy of oral valacyclovir and topical clobetasol was the best ranked with a mean reduction in healing time of -3.50 (95% CI -5.22 to -1.78) followed by vidarabine monophosphate of -3.22 (95% CI -4.59 to -1.85). No significant inconsistencies, heterogeneity, and publication bias were reported for TTH outcome analysis. For primary prevention outcomes, only 7 RCTs fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and none of the interventions was shown to be superior to each other. The absence of adverse events was reported by 16 studies, whereas other studies reported mild side effects only.
CONCLUSION
NMA highlighted that several agents were effective in the management of herpes labialis among which the combination of oral valacyclovir with topical clobetasol therapy was the most effective in reducing the time to heal. However, further studies are required to determine which intervention is the most effective in preventing the recurrence of herpes labialis.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Antiviral Agents; Clobetasol; Herpes Labialis; Network Meta-Analysis; Valacyclovir
PubMed: 36914303
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101778 -
Computational Biology and Chemistry Jun 2023Nucleoside analogs/derivatives (NAs/NDs) with potent antiviral activities are now deemed very convenient choices for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)...
Nucleoside analogs/derivatives (NAs/NDs) with potent antiviral activities are now deemed very convenient choices for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) arisen by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. At the same time, the appearance of a new strain of SARS-CoV-2, the Omicron variant, necessitates multiplied efforts in fighting COVID-19. Counteracting the crucial SARS-CoV-2 enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) jointly altogether using the same inhibitor is a quite successful new plan to demultiplicate SARS-CoV-2 particles and eliminate COVID-19 whatever the SARS-CoV-2 subtype is (due to the significant conservation nature of RdRps and ExoNs in the different SARS-CoV-2 strains). Successive in silico screening of known NAs finally disclosed six different promising NAs, which are riboprine/forodesine/tecadenoson/nelarabine/vidarabine/maribavir, respectively, that predictably can act through the planned dual-action mode. Further in vitro evaluations affirmed the anti-SARS-CoV-2/anti-COVID-19 potentials of these NAs, with riboprine and forodesine being at the top. The two NAs are able to effectively antagonize the replication of the new virulent SARS-CoV-2 strains with considerably minute in vitro anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC values of 189 and 408 nM for riboprine and 207 and 657 nM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing both remdesivir and the new anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. Furthermore, the favorable structural characteristics of the two molecules qualify them for varied types of isosteric and analogistic chemical derivatization. In one word, the present important outcomes of this comprehensive dual study revealed the anticipating repurposing potentials of some known nucleosides, led by the two NAs riboprine and forodesine, to successfully discontinue the coronaviral-2 polymerase/exoribonuclease interactions with RNA nucleotides in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (BA.5 sublineage) and accordingly alleviate COVID-19 infections, motivating us to initiate the two drugs' diverse anti-COVID-19 pharmacological evaluations to add both of them betimes in the COVID-19 therapeutic protocols.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Nucleosides; Exoribonucleases; RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase; Antiviral Agents
PubMed: 36842392
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2022.107768 -
Haematologica Jul 2023Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis. However, the optimal conditioning regimen either with...
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative treatment for myelofibrosis. However, the optimal conditioning regimen either with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) or myeloablative conditioning (MAC) is not well known. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database, we identified adults aged ≥18 years with myelofibrosis undergoing allo-HCT between 2008-2019 and analyzed the outcomes separately in the RIC and MAC cohorts based on the conditioning regimens used. Among 872 eligible patients, 493 underwent allo-HCT using RIC (fludarabine/ busulfan n=166, fludarabine/melphalan n=327) and 379 using MAC (fludarabine/busulfan n=247, busulfan/cyclophosphamide n=132). In multivariable analysis with RIC, fludarabine/melphalan was associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]=1.80; 95% confidenec interval [CI]: 1.15-2.81; P=0.009), higher early non-relapse mortality (HR=1.81; 95% CI: 1.12-2.91; P=0.01) and higher acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) (grade 2-4 HR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.03-2.03; P=0.03; grade 3-4 HR=2.21; 95%CI: 1.28-3.83; P=0.004) compared to fludarabine/busulfan. In the MAC setting, busulfan/cyclophosphamide was associated with a higher acute GvHD (grade 2-4 HR=2.33; 95% CI: 1.67-3.25; P<0.001; grade 3-4 HR=2.31; 95% CI: 1.52-3.52; P<0.001) and inferior GvHD-free relapse-free survival (GRFS) (HR=1.94; 95% CI: 1.49-2.53; P<0.001) as compared to fludarabine/busulfan. Hence, our study suggests that fludarabine/busulfan is associated with better outcomes in RIC (better overall survival, lower early non-relapse mortality, lower acute GvHD) and MAC (lower acute GvHD and better GRFS) in myelofibrosis.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Adolescent; Primary Myelofibrosis; Busulfan; Melphalan; Retrospective Studies; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Cyclophosphamide; Graft vs Host Disease; Transplantation Conditioning; Vidarabine
PubMed: 36779595
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2022.281958 -
ChemistrySelect Dec 2022Given the rapid progression of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an ultrafast response was urgently required to handle this major public crisis. To...
Given the rapid progression of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an ultrafast response was urgently required to handle this major public crisis. To contain the pandemic, investments are required to develop diagnostic tests, prophylactic vaccines, and novel therapies. Lately, nucleoside analog (NA) antivirals topped the scene as top options for the treatment of COVID-19 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. Meanwhile, the continuous generation of new lineages of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant caused a new challenge in the persistent COVID-19 battle. Hitting the two crucial SARS-CoV-2 enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) collectively together using only one single ligand is a very successful new approach to stop SARS-CoV-2 multiplication and combat COVID-19 irrespective of the SARS-CoV-2 variant type because RdRps and ExoNs are broadly conserved among all SARS-CoV-2 strains. Herein, the current comprehensive study investigated most NAs libraries, searching for the most ideal drug candidates expectedly able to perfectly act through this double tactic. Gradual computational filtration gave rise to six different promising NAs, which are riboprine, forodesine, tecadenoson, nelarabine, vidarabine, and maribavir, respectively. Further biological assessment proved for the first time, using the anti-RdRp/ExoN and anti-SARS-CoV-2 bioassays, that riboprine and forodesine, among all the six tested NAs, are able to powerfully inhibit the replication of the new virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2 with extremely minute anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC values of about 0.22 and 0.49 μM for riboprine and about 0.25 and 0.73 μM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing both remdesivir and the new anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. The prior data supported these biochemical findings, suggesting that riboprine and forodesine molecules strongly hit the key catalytic pockets of the SARS-CoV-2 (Omicron variant) RdRp's and ExoN's main active sites. Additionally, the ideal pharmacophoric features of riboprine and forodesine molecules render them typical dual-action inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication and proofreading, with their relatively flexible structures open for diverse types of chemical derivatization. In Brief, the current important results of this comprehensive study revealed the interesting repurposing potentials of, mainly, the two nucleosides riboprine and forodesine to effectively shut down the polymerase/exoribonuclease-RNA nucleotides interactions of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and consequently treat COVID-19 infections, motivating us to rapidly begin the two drugs' broad preclinical/clinical anti-COVID-19 bioevaluations, hoping to combine both drugs soon in the COVID-19 treatment protocols.
PubMed: 36718467
DOI: 10.1002/slct.202201912 -
Transplantation Proceedings 2023Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens decrease the risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell...
Outcomes of Busulfan, Fludarabine, and 400 cGy Total Body Irradiation Compared With Busulfan and Fludarabine Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Regimens for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients With Hematologic Diseases: A Single-Center Experience.
BACKGROUND
Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens decrease the risk for nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in adult patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies but increase the risk for relapse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of fludarabine-total body irradiation (TBI) with fludarabine among patients with hematologic diseases.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This retrospective study of 137 patients with different hematologic malignancies compared the outcomes of 63 patients who received a conventional RIC regimen with 2 days of IV busulfan (3.2 mg/kg/d × 2 days) and fludarabine with 74 patients who received the same regimen plus 400 cGy of fludarabine and busulfan (FB)-TBI divided in 2 doses over 1 day (200 cGy BID). Median follow-up was 4.62 years.
RESULTS
The donors were either HLA-matched siblings (36%) or HLA-matched unrelated donors (64%). The FB-TBI showed trends toward improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over FB (5-year PFS rates 50% vs 34%, P = .06, and 5-year OS rate 53% vs 39%, P = .13). Acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD), relapse, and NRM were similar between the 2 groups. The 5-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was lower in the FB-TBI group compared with the FB group (29% vs 52%, P = .003). Multivariable analysis revealed that grade III-IV aGVHD was the only independent risk factor for worse OS (P = .001) in both groups. A high disease risk index was possibly associated with inferior OS (P = .07) in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The FB-TBI is a safe and effective intensified RIC regimen for adult patients with hematologic malignancies. It predicted a lower risk for cGVHD and showed possibly improved PFS and OS compared with FB.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Busulfan; Retrospective Studies; Whole-Body Irradiation; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Hematologic Neoplasms; Vidarabine; Graft vs Host Disease; Transplantation Conditioning
PubMed: 36635141
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.10.061 -
Annals of Hematology Mar 2023Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a possible cure for patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) through potentially...
Fludarabine plus reduced-intensity busulfan versus fludarabine plus myeloablative busulfan in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a possible cure for patients with relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) through potentially beneficial graft versus lymphoma effects. However, allogeneic HCT is associated with high nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Fludarabine with reduced-intensity busulfan (Flu/Bu2) and myeloablative busulfan (Flu/Bu4) are commonly used in conditioning regimens for allogeneic HCT; however, data on their use in patients with NHL is limited. We investigated the effect of busulfan dose on outcomes by comparing Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 in patients with NHL who underwent allogeneic HCT. Our study included 415 adult patients with NHL who received Flu/Bu2 (315 patients) or Flu/Bu4 (100 patients) between January 2008 and December 2019. All patients were enrolled in the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program 2 of the Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS). To minimize potential confounding factors that may influence outcomes, we performed propensity score matching. The 5-year OS was 50.6% (95% confidence interval (CI), 39.4%-60.8%) and 32.2% (95% CI, 22.4-42.4%) in the Flu/Bu2 and Flu/Bu4 groups, respectively (p = 0.006). The hazard ratio comparing the two groups was 2.13 (95% CI, 1.30-3.50; p = 0.003). Both groups had a similar 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (38.2% vs 41.3%; p = 0.581), and the Flu/Bu4 group had a higher cumulative incidence of 5-year NRM (15.7% vs 31.9%; p = 0.043). In this study, Flu/Bu4 was associated with worse OS compared with Flu/Bu2 because of high NRM in patients with NHL.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Busulfan; Graft vs Host Disease; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Vidarabine; Transplantation Conditioning
PubMed: 36631705
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-023-05084-x -
Medicinal Chemistry Research : An... 2023Mysterious evolution of a new strain of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the Omicron variant, led to a new challenge in the persistent...
Mysterious evolution of a new strain of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the Omicron variant, led to a new challenge in the persistent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) battle. Objecting the conserved SARS-CoV-2 enzymes RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and 3'-to-5' exoribonuclease (ExoN) together using one ligand is a successful new tactic to stop SARS-CoV-2 multiplication and COVID-19 progression. The current comprehensive study investigated most nucleoside analogs (NAs) libraries, searching for the most ideal drug candidates expectedly able to act through this double tactic. Gradual computational filtration afforded six different promising NAs, riboprine/forodesine/tecadenoson/nelarabine/vidarabine/maribavir. Further biological assessment proved that riboprine and forodesine are able to powerfully inhibit the replication of the new virulent strains of SARS-CoV-2 with extremely minute in vitro anti-RdRp and anti-SARS-CoV-2 EC values of about 0.21 and 0.45 μM for riboprine and about 0.23 and 0.70 μM for forodesine, respectively, surpassing both remdesivir and the new anti-COVID-19 drug molnupiravir. These biochemical findings were supported by the prior in silico data. Additionally, the ideal pharmacophoric features of riboprine and forodesine molecules render them typical dual-action inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 replication and proofreading. These findings suggest that riboprine and forodesine could serve as prospective lead compounds against COVID-19. Graphical abstract.
PubMed: 36593869
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-022-02970-3 -
American Journal of Hematology Mar 2023
Common kinase mutations do not impact optimal molecular responses in core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia treated with fludarabine, cytarabine, and G-CSF based regimens.
Topics: Humans; Cytarabine; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Vidarabine; Mutation; Core Binding Factors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 36565294
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.26811