-
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2021The unprecedented successes of immunotherapies (IOs) including immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) and adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) in patients with late-stage cancer...
The unprecedented successes of immunotherapies (IOs) including immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) and adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) in patients with late-stage cancer provide proof-of-principle evidence that harnessing the immune system, in particular T cells, can be an effective approach to eradicate cancer. This instills strong interests in understanding the immunomodulatory effects of radiotherapy (RT), an area that was actually investigated more than a century ago but had been largely ignored for many decades. With the "newly" discovered immunogenic responses from RT, numerous endeavors have been undertaken to combine RT with IOs, in order to bolster anti-tumor immunity. However, the underlying mechanisms are not well defined, which is a subject of much investigation. We therefore conducted a systematic literature search on the molecular underpinnings of RT-induced immunomodulation and IOs, which identified the IFN-JAK-STAT pathway as a major regulator. Our further analysis of relevant studies revealed that the signaling strength and duration of this pathway in response to RT and IOs may determine eventual immunological outcomes. We propose that strategic targeting of this axis can boost the immunostimulatory effects of RT and radiosensitizing effects of IOs, thereby promoting the efficacy of combination therapy of RT and IOs.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Humans; Immunotherapy; Interferons; Janus Kinases; Neoplasms; Radiotherapy; STAT Transcription Factors; Signal Transduction; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 34830176
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212295 -
Cureus Sep 2021Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone cancer affecting children and young adults, most often occurring at the metaphysis of long bones. At present, treatment... (Review)
Review
Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone cancer affecting children and young adults, most often occurring at the metaphysis of long bones. At present, treatment with combinations of surgery and chemotherapy for the localized OS has only brought minuscule improvements in prognosis. In comparison, the advanced, metastatic, or recurrent forms of OS are often non-responsive to chemotherapy, adding to the dire need to develop new and efficient therapies. The question of interest investigated in this systematic review is whether immunotherapy can play a meaningful role in improving the clinical outcomes of children with OS. This article aims to summarize the preclinical and clinical research conducted thus far on potential therapeutic avenues for pediatric OS using immunotherapy, including methods like checkpoint inhibition, adoptive cellular therapy with T-cells, chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T), and natural killer (NK) cells. It also highlights the influence of the innate and adaptive immune system on the tumor microenvironment, allowing for OS progression and metastasis. This systematic review contains 27 articles and analyses of multiple clinical trials employing immunotherapeutic drugs to 785 osteosarcoma participants and over 243 pediatric patients. The articles were obtained through PubMed, PubMed Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov and individually assessed for quality using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) checklist and the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The reviews reveal that immunotherapy's most significant impact on pediatric OS includes combining immune checkpoint blockers with traditional chemotherapy and surgery. However, due to the bimodal distribution of this aggressive malignancy, these studies cannot precisely estimate the overall effect and any potential life-threatening adverse events following therapy in children. Further research is required to fully assess the impact of these immunotherapies, including more extensive multinational clinical trials to focus on the pediatric population.
PubMed: 34725602
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18349 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2021Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer of the lymphatic system. About 30% to 40% of people with DLBCL experience relapse and 10% are refractory to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive cancer of the lymphatic system. About 30% to 40% of people with DLBCL experience relapse and 10% are refractory to first-line treatment usually consisting of R-CHOP chemotherapy. Of those eligible for second-line treatment, commonly consisting of salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), around 50% experience relapse. With a median overall survival of less than six to 12 months, the prognosis of individuals who relapse or are refractory (r/r) to advanced lines of treatment or of those who are ineligible for ASCT, is very poor. With the introduction of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, a novel treatment option for these people is available.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for people with relapsed or refractory (r/r) DLBCL.
SEARCH METHODS
An experienced information specialist performed a systematic database search for relevant articles on CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase until September 11th, 2020. We also searched trial registries and reference lists of identified studies up to this date. All search results were screened by two authors independently and a third author was involved in case of discrepancies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included prospectively planned trials evaluating CAR T-cell therapy for people with r/r DLBCL. We had planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and we flexibly adapted eligibility criteria to the most reliable study designs available. We excluded studies involving fewer than 10 participants with r/r DLBCL and studies with a proportion of participants with r/r DLBCL below 70%, unless data were reported separately for this subgroup.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors extracted data and performed risk of bias ratings independently. A third author was involved in case of disagreements. As our search did not yield any completed RCTs, prospective controlled non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) or prospective observational studies with a control group, we did not meta-analyse data and reported all results narratively. We adopted the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for prioritised outcomes.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 13 eligible uncontrolled studies evaluating a single or multiple arms of CAR T-cell therapies. We also identified 38 ongoing studies, including three RCTs. Ten studies are awaiting classification due to completion with no retrievable results data or insufficient data to justify inclusion. The mean number of participants enrolled, treated with CAR T-cell therapy and evaluated in the included studies were 79 (range 12 to 344; data unavailable for two studies), 61 (range 12 to 294; data unavailable for one study) and 52 (range 11 to 256), respectively. Most studies included people with r/r DLBCL among people with other haematological B-cell malignancies. Participants had received at least a median of three prior treatment lines (data unavailable for four studies), 5% to 50% had undergone ASCT (data unavailable for five studies) and, except for two studies, 3% to 18% had undergone allogenic stem-cell transplantation (data unavailable for eight studies). The overall risk of bias was high for all studies, in particular, due to incomplete follow-up and the absence of blinding. None of the included studies had a control group so that no adequate comparative effect measures could be calculated. The duration of follow-up varied substantially between studies, in particular, for harms. Our certainty in the evidence is very low for all outcomes. Overall survival was reported by eight studies (567 participants). Four studies reported survival rates at 12 months which ranged between 48% and 59%, and one study reported an overall survival rate of 50.5% at 24 months. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on overall survival. Two studies including 294 participants at baseline and 59 participants at the longest follow-up (12 months or 18 months) described improvements of quality of life measured with the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level visual analogue scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) or Function Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on quality of life. None of the studies reported treatment-related mortality. Five studies (550 participants) reported the occurrence of adverse events among participants, ranging between 99% and 100% for any grade adverse events and 68% to 98% for adverse events grade ≥ 3. In three studies (253 participants), 56% to 68% of participants experienced serious adverse events, while in one study (28 participants), no serious adverse events occurred. CAR T-cell therapy may increase the risk of adverse events and serious adverse events but the evidence is very uncertain about the exact risk. The occurrence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in 11 studies (675 participants) under use of various grading criteria. Five studies reported between 42% and 100% of participants experiencing CRS according to criteria described in Lee 2014. CAR T-cell therapy may increase the risk of CRS but the evidence is very uncertain about the exact risk. Nine studies (575 participants) reported results on progression-free survival, disease-free survival or relapse-free survival. Twelve-month progression-free survival rates were reported by four studies and ranged between 44% and 75%. In one study, relapse-free survival remained at a rate of 64% at both 12 and 18 months. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on progression-free survival. Thirteen studies (620 participants) provided data on complete response rates. At six months, three studies reported complete response rates between 40% and 45%. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of CAR T-cell therapy on complete response rates.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The available evidence on the benefits and harms of CAR T-cell therapy for people with r/r DLBCL is limited, mainly because of the absence of comparative clinical trials. The results we present should be regarded in light of this limitation and conclusions should be drawn very carefully. Due to the uncertainty in the current evidence, a large number of ongoing investigations and a risk of substantial and potentially life-threatening complications requiring supplementary treatment, it is critical to continue evaluating the evidence on this new therapy.
Topics: Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Observational Studies as Topic; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
PubMed: 34515338
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013365.pub2 -
Transplant International : Official... Dec 2021The use of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) in adoptive immunotherapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients with... (Review)
Review
The use of Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLs) in adoptive immunotherapy in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) has demonstrated safety and effectiveness. EBV-CTLs might also be the effective treatment of refractory PTLD of solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. Two independent assessors searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from their inception to November 2020. Eleven studies with 76 patients (42, 55% male) were included. We extracted the data and completed the quality assessments. Most of the studies were from Europe and the USA. Liver and kidney transplantation accounted for most of the transplant types. Thirty-five (46.1%) patients were diagnosed with monomorphic PTLD, and B lymphocyte type was the most common. All the patients received primary treatment for PTLD while it was ineffective. CTLs included autologous EBV-CTLs (15/76, 22%) and HLA-matched third-party EBV-CTLs (61/76, 78%). The response rate for EBV-CTL treatment of refractory PTLD was 66%. Of 50 patients, 36 achieved complete remission and 14 achieved partial remission. EBV-DNA level decreased in 39 patients. Adverse reactions were rare and mild. We conclude that adoptive therapy with EBV-specific CTLs is safe, well-tolerated, and effective in PTLD.
Topics: Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Female; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Male; T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic
PubMed: 34510581
DOI: 10.1111/tri.14107 -
Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing :... 2021Children with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and B-cell lymphoma, particularly those with relapsed or refractory disease, are increasingly enrolled on phase II...
Evidence-Based Recommendations for Nurse Monitoring and Management of Immunotherapy-Induced Cytokine Release Syndrome: A Systematic Review from the Children's Oncology Group.
Children with B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia and B-cell lymphoma, particularly those with relapsed or refractory disease, are increasingly enrolled on phase II and phase III clinical trials studying immunotherapies. These therapeutic agents may be associated with a high risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and nurses lack standardized guidelines for monitoring and managing patients with CRS. Six studies and one clinical practice guideline were included in this systematic review that examined the evidence of CRS following administration of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy or the bi-specific T-cell engager antibody, blinatumomab. Six nursing practice recommendations (five strong, one weak) were developed based on low or very low-quality evidence: three reflect preinfusion monitoring, one focuses on monitoring during and postinfusion, and three pertain to the nurse's role in CRS management.
Topics: Child; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Humans; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
PubMed: 34460332
DOI: 10.1177/10434542211040203 -
Advances in Therapy Sep 2021Given the relatively small number of patients with haemophilia A, head-to-head comparisons between recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products are difficult to conduct. This...
Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison of Efficacy and Consumption of rVIII-SingleChain Versus Two Recombinant FVIII Products Used for Prophylactic Treatment of Adults/Adolescents with Severe Haemophilia A.
INTRODUCTION
Given the relatively small number of patients with haemophilia A, head-to-head comparisons between recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products are difficult to conduct. This study compared the efficacy and consumption of rVIII-SingleChain (lonoctocog alfa, AFSTYLA) with rAHF-PFM (octocog alfa, Advate) and rFVIIIFc (efmoroctocog alfa, Elocta), for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated adolescents/adults with severe haemophilia A, through a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC).
METHODS
A systematic literature review identified published clinical trials for rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc. Individual patient data for rVIII-SingleChain were used to match baseline patient characteristics to those from published trials, using an approach similar to propensity score weighting. After matching, annualized bleeding rates (ABR), percentage of patients with zero bleeds, and rFVIII consumption were compared across trial populations.
RESULTS
Published data were identified from two rAHF-PFM trials and one rFVIIIFc trial. rVIII-SingleChain had similar ABR (risk ratio [RR]: 0.74 [0.16; 3.48]; RR: 1.18 [0.85; 1.65]) and percentage of patients with zero bleeds (odds ratio [OR]: 1.34 [0.56; 3.22]; OR: 0.78 [0.47; 1.31]) versus rAHF-PFM and rFVIIIFc, respectively. Annual rVIII-SingleChain consumption was significantly lower than rAHF-PFM (mean difference: - 1507.66 IU/kg/year [- 2011.71; - 1003.61]) and equivalent to rFVIIIFc (RR: 0.96 [0.62; 1.49]).
CONCLUSION
Although limited to published information for comparator trials, these results suggest that with an annualized rFVIII consumption comparable to rFVIIIFc, but significantly lower than rAHF-PFM, routine prophylaxis with rVIII-SingleChain is able to maintain a similar ABR and percentage of patients with zero bleeds, attesting to the long-acting nature of rVIII-SingleChain.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Factor VIII; Hemophilia A; Hemorrhage; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Propensity Score; Recombinant Proteins
PubMed: 34368918
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01853-0 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2021The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients...
BACKGROUND
The efficacy and safety of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has already been demonstrated. However, patients with a history of/active secondary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded from the licensing trials conducted on two widely used CAR-T cell products, Axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) and Tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel). Hence, the objective of the present review was to assess whether secondary CNS lymphoma patients would derive a benefit from Axi-cel or Tisa-cel therapy, while maintaining controllable safety.
METHOD
Two reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library independently in order to identify all records associated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel published prior to February 15, 2021. Studies that included secondary CNS lymphoma patients treated with Axi-cel and Tisa-cel and reported or could be inferred efficacy and safety endpoints of secondary CNS lymphoma patients were included. A tool designed specifically to evaluate the risk of bias in case series and reports and the ROBINS-I tool applied for cohort studies were used.
RESULTS
Ten studies involving forty-four patients were included. Of these, seven were case reports or series. The other three reports were cohort studies involving twenty-five patients. Current evidence indicates that secondary CNS lymphoma patients could achieve long-term remission following Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment. Compared with the non-CNS cohort, however, progression-free survival and overall survival tended to be shorter. This was possibly due to the relatively small size of the CNS cohort. The incidence and grades of adverse effects in secondary CNS lymphoma patients resembled those in the non-CNS cohort. No incidences of CAR-T cell-related deaths were reported. Nevertheless, the small sample size introduced a high risk of bias and prevented the identification of specific patients who could benefit more from CAR-T cell therapy.
CONCLUSION
Secondary CNS lymphoma patients could seem to benefit from both Axi-cel and Tisa-cel treatment, with controllable risks. Thus, CAR-T cell therapy has potential as a candidate treatment for lymphoma patients with CNS involvement. Further prospective studies with larger samples and longer follow-up periods are warranted and recommended.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biological Products; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; T-Lymphocytes; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 34290712
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.693200 -
Advances in Therapy Aug 2021Traditional statistical techniques for extrapolating short-term survival data for anticancer therapies assume the same mortality rate for noncured and "cured" patients,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Traditional statistical techniques for extrapolating short-term survival data for anticancer therapies assume the same mortality rate for noncured and "cured" patients, which is appropriate for projecting survival of non-curative therapies but may lead to an underestimation of the treatment effectiveness for potentially curative therapies. Our objective was to ascertain research trends in survival extrapolation techniques used to project the survival benefits of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies.
METHODS
A global systematic literature search produced a review of survival analyses of CAR-T therapies, published between January 1, 2015 and December 14, 2020, based on publications sourced from MEDLINE, scientific conferences, and health technology assessment agencies. Trends in survival extrapolation techniques used, and the rationale for selecting advanced techniques, are discussed.
RESULTS
Twenty publications were included, the majority of which (65%, N = 13) accounted for curative intent of CAR-T therapies through the use of advanced extrapolation techniques, i.e., mixture cure models [MCMs] (N = 10) or spline-based models (N = 3). The authors' rationale for using the MCM approach included (a) better statistical fits to the observed Kaplan-Meier curves (KMs) and (b) visual inspection of the KMs indicated that a proportion of patients experienced long-term remission and survival which is not inherently captured in standard parametric distributions.
DISCUSSION
Our findings suggest that an advanced extrapolation technique should be considered in base case survival analyses of CAR-T therapies when extrapolating short-term survival data to long-term horizons extending beyond the clinical trial duration.
CONCLUSION
Advanced extrapolation techniques allow researchers to account for the proportion of patients with an observed plateau in survival from clinical trial data; by only using standard-partitioned modeling, researchers may risk underestimating the survival benefits for the subset of patients with long-term remission. Sensitivity analysis with an alternative advanced extrapolation technique should be implemented and re-assessment using clinical trial extension data and/or real-world data should be conducted as longer-term data become available.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Survival Analysis; T-Lymphocytes; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34251651
DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01841-4 -
JAMA Network Open Jul 2021Hundreds of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapies are under investigation for hematologic malignant cancers and solid malignant tumors. As the field of modern CAR...
IMPORTANCE
Hundreds of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) therapies are under investigation for hematologic malignant cancers and solid malignant tumors. As the field of modern CAR therapy enters its second decade, clinical trials that demonstrate the efficacy of CAR therapies using randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and/or investigate methods to optimize patient outcomes with commercially available CAR therapies are increasingly important.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the landscape of registered CAR-related trials with dual focuses on trial methods and intent.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
This systematic review identified 1304 ongoing or upcoming CAR-related trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as of December 22, 2020, and excluded 513 trials that did not pertain to cell-based therapy. Both CAR-related and trial-related variables, including target antigens and countries of origin, were recorded. Trials were categorized as non-RCTs that compared CAR with non-CAR therapies or RCTs in which every arm received CAR therapy. Trial intent was separately categorized as demonstrating the efficacy of a CAR therapy, optimizing patient outcomes with established CAR therapies using adjunctive non-CAR modalities, or miscellaneous.
FINDINGS
Of 778 relevant trials, 587 (75%) involved blood cancers, whereas 182 (23%) involved solid tumor cancers; the remaining 9 (1%) involved nonmalignant diseases. A total of 433 trials (56%) were from China and 288 from the US (37%). Ten RCTs (1%) compared CAR therapies with non-CAR therapies, including phase 3 RCTs for 4 of 5 CAR therapies (80%) that are currently commercially available. Twenty-eight studies (4%) sought to optimize outcomes with established CAR therapies using non-CAR drugs or radiotherapy, whereas 3 studies (0.4%) sought to optimize supportive care during CAR therapy.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This systematic review found that randomized and optimization-focused trials are comparatively rare within the landscape of ongoing and upcoming CAR-related trials. As the field of modern CAR therapy enters its second decade, additional studies of these characteristics are necessary to strengthen the evidence base for CAR therapy and improve patient outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Research
PubMed: 34236412
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15668 -
Value in Health : the Journal of the... Jun 2021To evaluate alternative methods to calculate and/or attribute economic surplus in the cost-effectiveness analysis of single or short-term therapies.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate alternative methods to calculate and/or attribute economic surplus in the cost-effectiveness analysis of single or short-term therapies.
METHODS
We performed a systematic literature review of articles describing alternative methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of potentially curative therapies whose assessment using traditional methods may suggest unaffordable valuations owing to the magnitude of estimated long-term quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains or cost offsets. Through internal deliberation and discussion with staff at the Health Technology Assessment bodies in England and Canada, we developed the following 3 alternative methods for further evaluation: (1) capping annual costs in the comparator arm at $150 000 per year; (2) "sharing" the economic surplus with the health sector by apportioning only 50% of cost offsets or 50% of cost offsets and QALY gains to the value of the therapy; and (3) crediting the therapy with only 12 years of the average annual cost offsets or cost offsets and QALY gains over the lifetime horizon. The impact of each alternative method was evaluated by applying it in an economic model of 3 hypothetical condition-treatment scenarios meant to reflect a diversity of chronicity and background healthcare costs.
RESULTS
The alternative with greatest impact on threshold price for the fatal pediatric condition spinal muscular atrophy type 1 was the 12-year cutoff scenario. For a hypothetical one-time treatment for hemophilia A, capping cost offsets at $150 000 per year had the greatest impact. For chimeric antigen receptor T-cell treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, capping cost offsets or using 12-year threshold had little impact, whereas 50% sharing of surplus including QALY gains and cost offsets greatly reduced threshold pricing.
CONCLUSIONS
Health Technology Assessment bodies and policy makers will wrestle with how to evaluate single or short-term potentially curative therapies and establish pricing and payment mechanisms to ensure sustainability. Scenario analyses using alternative methods for calculating and apportioning economic surplus can provide starkly different assessment results. These methods may stimulate important societal dialogue on fair pricing for these novel treatments.
Topics: Antibodies, Bispecific; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Biological Products; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy; Genetic Therapy; Health Care Costs; Hemophilia A; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Models, Economic; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Remission Induction; Spinal Muscular Atrophies of Childhood; Technology Assessment, Biomedical; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34119082
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.02.008