-
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Jul 2022Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are widely used for measurement of functional outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, PROMs rely on patient collaboration... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are widely used for measurement of functional outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, PROMs rely on patient collaboration and suffer from various types of bias. Wearable Activity Monitors (WAMs) are increasingly used to objectify functional assessment. The objectives of this systematic review were to identify and characterise the WAMs technology and metrics currently used for orthopaedic trauma research.
METHODS
PubMed and Embase biomedical literature search engines were queried. Eligibility criteria included: Human clinical studies published in the English language between 2010 and 2019 involving fracture management and WAMs. Variables collected from each article included: Technology used, vendor/product, WAM body location, metrics measured, measurement time period, year of publication, study geographic location, phase of treatment studied, fractures studied, number of patients studied, sex and age of the study subjects, and study level of evidence. Six investigators reviewed the resulting papers. Descriptive statistics of variables of interest were used to analyse the data.
RESULTS
One hundred and thirty-six papers were available for analysis, showing an increasing trend of publications per year. Accelerometry followed by plantar pressure insoles were the most commonly employed technologies. The most common location for WAM placement was insoles, followed by the waist. The most commonly studied fracture type was hip fractures followed by fragility fractures in general, ankle, "lower extremity", and tibial fractures. The rehabilitation phase following surgery was the most commonly studied period. Sleep duration, activity time or step counts were the most commonly reported WAM metrics. A preferred, clinically validated WAM metric was not identified.
CONCLUSIONS
WAMs have an increasing presence in the orthopaedic trauma literature. The optimal implementation of this technology and its use to understand patients' pre-injury and post-injury functions is currently insufficiently explored and represents an area that will benefit from future study.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO ID:210344.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-022-00629-0.
PubMed: 35813536
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00629-0 -
Orthopedic Reviews 2022Unstable ankle fractures are very frequent. Given the instability, they often require surgical treatment, but literature scarcely reports on the outcomes of their...
BACKGROUND
Unstable ankle fractures are very frequent. Given the instability, they often require surgical treatment, but literature scarcely reports on the outcomes of their management.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES
For this systematic review we asked: (1) What are the outcomes in treatment of unstable ankle fractures? (2) What about complications of treatment in unstable fractures? (3) What factors influence the outcomes? (4) What about the role of the posterior malleolus?
METHODS
The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were interrogated using the search terms "bimalleolar" or "trimalleolar" and "fracture". Studies were included if they reported on: (1) bimalleolar or trimalleolar fracture in adults; (2) treatment; (3) outcomes reported by scales; (4) follow-up. The final review included 33 studies. The quality of the studies was evaluated with the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) questionnaire.
RESULTS
All the outcomes of the thirty-three selected studies were analyzed.
DISCUSSION
Surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures should always be performed within the first 48 hours from the trauma, preventing instability and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Surgeon should consider factor may influence functional outcomes. Posterior malleolar fractures should be fixed regardless the size, considering some individual factors.
PubMed: 35769653
DOI: 10.52965/001c.35688 -
Quality of Life Research : An... Jan 2023Ankle fractures are commonly occurring fractures, especially in the aging population, where they often present as fragility fractures. The disease burden and economic... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Ankle fractures are commonly occurring fractures, especially in the aging population, where they often present as fragility fractures. The disease burden and economic costs to the patient and society are considerable. Choosing accurate outcome measures for the evaluation of the management of ankle fractures in clinical trials facilitates better decision-making. This systematic review assesses the evidence for the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in the evaluation of adult patients with ankle fractures.
METHODS
Searches were performed in CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline and Google Scholar from the date of inception to July 2021. Studies that assessed the measurement properties of a PROM in an adult ankle fracture population were included. The included studies were assessed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews of PROMs.
RESULTS
In total, 13 different PROMs were identified in the 23 included articles. Only the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM) presented some evidence on content validity. The Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) displayed good evidence of construct validity and internal consistency. The measurement properties of the OMAS, LEFS and SEFAS were most studied.
CONCLUSION
The absence of validation studies covering all measurement properties of PROMs used in the adult ankle fracture population precludes the recommendation of a specific PROM to be used in the evaluation of this population. Further research should focus on validation of the content validity of the instruments used in patients with ankle fractures.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Humans; Ankle; Ankle Fractures; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Quality of Life
PubMed: 35716224
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03166-3 -
Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics Apr 2022Management of displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures can be operative or nonoperative. Several randomized and case-controlled trials have been recently conducted...
BACKGROUND
Management of displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures can be operative or nonoperative. Several randomized and case-controlled trials have been recently conducted in order to reach a consensus. The purpose of this analysis is to provide recommendations for the management of these injuries based on the best available clinical evidence.
METHODS
An up-to-date search was conducted using predefined eligibility criteria. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) was followed. Randomized and prospective clinical trials were only included after agreement among all authors. Relevant literature was appraised for methodologic quality using the Cochrane collaboration tool for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Newcastle Ottawa Score for the prospective trials. Outcome measures included American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score, visual analog scale score, return to activity, complications, residual pain, and development of arthritis. RevMan, version 5.3.5 software, was used for data analysis. A value of <.05 was considered statistically significant, and CIs were set at 95%.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies and 1251 patients were included in our analysis. This involved 10 RCTs and 3 prospective clinical trials. Shoe fitting problems and failure to return to activity favored the operative group. No other studied variables showed clear superiority of a specific treatment approach.
CONCLUSION
The best evidence available at this time favors an advantage to operative treatment. Patients should be informed that the clear differences are centered on comfort of shoe wear and return to desired activity level. Level II, meta-analysis of RCT and Prospective Cohort studies.
PubMed: 35655706
DOI: 10.1177/24730114221101609 -
Cureus Apr 2022Tibial plafond fractures (TPFs) are uncommon but potentially devastating injuries to the ankle. Operative treatments include internal and external fixation modalities.... (Review)
Review
Tibial plafond fractures (TPFs) are uncommon but potentially devastating injuries to the ankle. Operative treatments include internal and external fixation modalities. This article provides a systematic review of the clinical and functional outcomes of TPFs treated specifically with circular external fixation (CEF). A literature search of medical databases from inception to 13th November 2020 was performed. Original studies written in the English language reporting clinical, radiological, and functional outcome data of TPF treated with CEF were included. Patient demographics, fracture classification, open fractures, post-operative complications, clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, and functional outcomes were collected. Quality and risk of bias were assessed using standardised scoring tools.In total, 16 studies were included. One prospective randomised study was identified. Collated data of 303 patients were analysed. The mean time to union was 21 weeks. Malunion occurred in 12.4%. The rate of deep infection was 4.8%, but no amputations were recorded. The risk of minor soft tissue infection (including pin-site infections) was 54%. Almost two-thirds achieved good-to-anatomic reduction radiologically. Approximately one-third reported excellent functional outcome scores. The quality of the studies was deemed satisfactory. A moderate risk of bias was acknowledged. This systemic review provides a summary of outcome data regarding CEF as a treatment for TPF. It highlights CEF as an acceptable treatment option with comparable results to that of internal fixation. Further higher-quality evidence is advised.
PubMed: 35592184
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.24204 -
British Medical Bulletin Sep 2022Ankle fractures in sport are common. Their optimal management is unclear, as is when patients can return to their sports activities. This systematic review provides a...
INTRODUCTION
Ankle fractures in sport are common. Their optimal management is unclear, as is when patients can return to their sports activities. This systematic review provides a contemporary assessment of the literature on return to sports following acute traumatic ankle fractures managed both operatively and non-operatively.
SOURCES OF DATA
We systematically searched Pubmed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and CINAHL using the terms 'ankle fractures', 'ankle injuries', 'athletes', 'sports', 'return to sport', 'return to activity', 'operative management', 'non-operative management'.
AREAS OF AGREEMENT
Thirteen retrospective studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was generally poor. The proportion of patients returning to sporting activity was high. In some studies, a quicker return to sporting activity was demonstrated in patients managed non-operatively.
AREAS OF CONTROVERSY
The time to return to sporting activity and level of performance post-treatment are not universally recorded, and the optimal time to return to sport remains to be confirmed.
GROWING POINTS
Conservative management for stable or undisplaced fracture may result in a higher proportion of patients returning to sport more quickly.
AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH
Randomized controlled trials should compare conservative to surgical treatment for appropriately chosen fracture patterns. Future studies should routinely report the timing of return to sport, the level of performance reached, and the time to achieve this.
Topics: Ankle; Ankle Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Return to Sport
PubMed: 35511134
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldac016 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... 2022The optimal treatment strategy of Lisfranc injury is still in debate. This study aimed to compare the functional outcome and complications of dorsal bridge plating (BP)...
The optimal treatment strategy of Lisfranc injury is still in debate. This study aimed to compare the functional outcome and complications of dorsal bridge plating (BP) and transarticular screws (TAS). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the present literature was performed. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched using set search criteria and date range January 2000 to July 26, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational comparative studies concerning the outcome of dorsal BP and TAS for the fixation of Lisfranc injuries were eligible for inclusion. Random effect models were used to analyze pooled data. Forest plots using 95% confidence intervals (CI) were created to illustrate mean differences and odds ratios. Four observational studies were eligible for inclusion, including 111 patients in the BP group and 87 patients in the TAS group. American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was significantly higher in the BP group (mean difference 7.08, 95% CI 1.50-12.66, p = .01). Osteoarthritis was significantly less common in the BP group compared to the TAS group (odds ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.22-0.94, p = .03). No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative infection, hardware removal, chronic pain, and secondary arthrodesis. Dorsal bridge plating of fractures in the Lisfranc joint may lead to better functional outcome and a lower incidence of post-traumatic arthritis when compared to transarticular screws. A larger body of high-quality evidence is required to independently analyze the severity of fractures in the different columns involved and subsequent outcomes of operative management.
PubMed: 35459613
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.03.002 -
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related... Aug 2022
Meta-Analysis
Topics: Ankle Fractures; Ankle Injuries; Ankle Joint; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Humans; Weight-Bearing
PubMed: 35452019
DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002223 -
Injury Jun 2022Adequate foot function is paramount in daily activities, yet the incidence of foot fractures shows a rising trend. Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly...
INTRODUCTION
Adequate foot function is paramount in daily activities, yet the incidence of foot fractures shows a rising trend. Patient-reported outcome measures are increasingly used for research; however, the use of a wide variety of available instruments is undesirable. In the current study, an overview is provided of patient-reported outcome measures used in clinical research evaluating outcomes of foot fractures. Tools are provided to choose the most adequate instrument in future research.
METHODS
To identify the instruments, a systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles published since 2000, reporting on traumatic foot fractures and/or their posttraumatic sequelae, and using a minimum of one condition- or region-specific patient-reported outcome measure were included. Forty-nine instruments were identified, used 636 times collectively. These instruments were evaluated on frequency of use, bones or joints analyzed with the instruments, the type and amount of contained items, and existing literature on their psychometric properties.
RESULTS
The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale was used predominantly (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale; n = 243, 38.2%), followed by the Maryland Foot Score (n = 90, 14.2%). Twenty-seven instruments were included for further analysis. The majority included questions on mobility (27/27) and pain (24/27). Tools to select an adequate instrument for new research are presented in the appendices.
DISCUSSION
Controversy surrounds the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale as other authors have found that its psychometric properties, indicating it measures what it is supposed to measure adequately, are flawed.
CONCLUSION
A multitude of specific patient-reported outcome measures concerning foot fractures exists. Furthermore, the predominantly used instrument is deemed insufficient regarding quality as found by other studies. A valid, reliable, and responsive patient-reported outcome measure for clinical research on foot fractures is necessary. The most adequate existing ones for future research on different topics can be found through the tools provided.
Topics: Ankle; Ankle Injuries; Foot Injuries; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Knee Injuries; Patient Reported Outcome Measures
PubMed: 35431041
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.049 -
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) May 2023Posterior malleolar fractures are found in almost 50% of all ankle fractures. The high clinical relevance of these joint fractures is explained by the significantly...
BACKGROUND
Posterior malleolar fractures are found in almost 50% of all ankle fractures. The high clinical relevance of these joint fractures is explained by the significantly worse clinical and functional outcome. There is still a lack of unified opinion regarding the classification and treatment of these fractures.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this article is to provide a systematic literature review of clinical studies that investigated posterior malleolar fractures and classified them using one of the three established classifications according to Haraguchi, Bartonicek/Rammelt, or Mason.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
PubMed was searched without time limits. The systematic literature search was performed according to the current criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The methodological quality of the included studies was quantified using the modified Coleman score.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies with a total of 2220 patients were included in this systematic literature review. Trimalleolar fractures showed a significantly less favorable prognosis than other ankle fractures. The quality of reduction was the most important prognostic factor for the clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION
None of the three classifications examined has become established in the literature. Most of the classifications are weak or should not be used with respect to a derivable treatment algorithm or a prognosis with respect to the outcome. Only the classification according to Bartonicek/Rammelt is suitable to become established in the literature and in clinical practice due to its derivable treatment algorithm.
Topics: Humans; Ankle Fractures; Treatment Outcome; Intra-Articular Fractures
PubMed: 35394158
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-022-01162-3