-
Fertility and Sterility Nov 2016To compare the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes and obesity among patients detected in referral versus unselected populations. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare the prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) phenotypes and obesity among patients detected in referral versus unselected populations.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S)
Thirteen thousand seven hundred ninety-six reproductive-age patients with PCOS, as defined by the extended Rotterdam 2003 criteria.
INTERVENTION(S)
Review of PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, 2003-2016. Only observational studies were included. Data were extracted using a web-based, piloted form and combined for meta-analysis.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
PCOS phenotypes were classified as follows: phenotype A, clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism (HA) + oligo-/anovulation (OA) + polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM); phenotype B, HA+OA; phenotype C, HA+PCOM; and phenotype D, OA+PCOM.
RESULT(S)
Forty-one eligible studies, reporting on 43 populations, were identified. Pooled estimates of detected PCOS phenotype prevalence were consequently documented in referral versus unselected populations, as [1] phenotype A, 50% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-54%) versus 19% (95% CI, 13%-27%); [2] phenotype B, 13% (95% CI, 11%-17%) versus 25% (95% CI, 15%-37%); [3] phenotype C, 14% (95% CI, 12%-16%) versus 34% (95% CI, 25-46%); and [4] phenotype D, 17% (95% CI, 13%-22%) versus 19% (95% CI, 14%-25%). Differences between referral and unselected populations were statistically significant for phenotypes A, B, and C. Referral PCOS subjects had a greater mean body mass index (BMI) than local controls, a difference that was not apparent in unselected PCOS.
CONCLUSION(S)
The prevalence of more complete phenotypes in PCOS and mean BMI were higher in subjects identified in referral versus unselected populations, suggesting the presence of significant referral bias.
Topics: Body Mass Index; Female; Humans; Obesity; Observational Studies as Topic; Ovulation; Phenotype; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Prevalence; Referral and Consultation; Selection Bias
PubMed: 27530062
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1121 -
Journal of Medicine and Life 2015To elucidate the prepubertal risk factors associated with the development of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and determine the special clinical manifestations of the... (Review)
Review
RATIONALE
To elucidate the prepubertal risk factors associated with the development of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) and determine the special clinical manifestations of the syndrome in this transitional time of a woman's life.
OBJECTIVE
To propose therapeutic targets and regimens, not only to prevent the long-term complications of the syndrome, but also to improve the self-esteem of a young girl who matures into womanhood.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A systematic review of literature was performed through electronic database searches (Pubmed, Medline and Embase). Studies published in English-language, peer-reviewed journals from 1996 to 2013 were included. The selected studies focused on the risk factors, the unique features and treatment options of the PCOS in puberty. The pathogenesis of the PCOS was hypothesized to be based on interactions between genetic and certain environmental factors. The diagnosis was usually difficult in young girls. The syndrome was related to a greater risk of future infertility, type II diabetes mellitus, the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Early treatment was crucial to prevent the long-term complications of the syndrome, especially infertility and cardiovascular disease.
DISCUSSION
The recognition of the early signs of PCOS during or even before adolescence is of great importance. It is essential to establish the correct diagnosis for PCOS and rule out other causes of androgen excess in young women with hyperandrogenism. The type of treatment applied should be considered on an individual basis.
ABBREVIATIONS
PCOS = Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.
Topics: Adolescent; Diagnosis, Differential; Diagnostic Imaging; Female; Humans; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Puberty; Risk Factors
PubMed: 26351529
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2014The use of insulin-sensitising agents, such as metformin, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are undergoing ovulation induction or in vitro fertilisation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The use of insulin-sensitising agents, such as metformin, in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who are undergoing ovulation induction or in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles has been widely studied. Metformin reduces hyperinsulinaemia and suppresses the excessive ovarian production of androgens. As a consequence, it is suggested that metformin could improve assisted reproductive techniques (ART) outcomes, such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), pregnancy and live birth rates.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effectiveness and safety of metformin as a co-treatment during IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in achieving pregnancy or live birth in women with PCOS.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, the metaRegister of Controlled Trials and reference lists of articles (up to 15 October 2014).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Types of studies: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing metformin treatment with placebo or no treatment in women with PCOS who underwent IVF or ICSI treatment.
TYPES OF PARTICIPANTS
women of reproductive age with anovulation due to PCOS with or without co-existing infertility factors.Types of interventions: metformin administered before and during IVF or ICSI treatment.Types of outcome measures: live birth rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome , incidence of participant-reported side effects, serum oestradiol level on the day of trigger, serum androgen level, and fasting insulin and glucose levels.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected the studies, extracted the data according to the protocol and assessed study quality. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE methods.
MAIN RESULTS
We included nine randomised controlled trials involving a total of 816 women with PCOS. When metformin was compared with placebo there was no clear evidence of a difference between the groups in live birth rates (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.40, five RCTs, 551 women, I(2) = 52%, low-quality evidence). Our findings suggest that for a woman with a 32 % chance of achieving a live birth using placebo or other treatment, the corresponding chance using metformin treatment would be between 28% and 53%.When metformin was compared with placebo or no treatment, clinical pregnancy rates were higher in the metformin group (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.15; eight RCTs, 775 women, I(2) = 18%, moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 31% chance of achieving a clinical pregnancy using placebo or no treatment, the corresponding chance using metformin treatment would be between 32% and 49%.The risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was lower in the metformin group (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.49, eight RCTs, 798 women, I(2) = 11%, moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that for a woman with a 27% risk of having OHSS without metformin the corresponding chance using metformin treatment would be between 6% and 15%.Side effects (mostly gastrointestinal) were more common in the metformin group (OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.88 to 10.72, for RCTs, 431 women, I(2)=57%, low quality evidence)The overall quality of the evidence was moderate for the outcomes of clinical pregnancy, OHSS and miscarriage, and low for other outcomes. The main limitations in the evidence were imprecision and inconsistency.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review found no conclusive evidence that metformin treatment before or during ART cycles improved live birth rates in women with PCOS. However, the use of this insulin-sensitising agent increased clinical pregnancy rates and decreased the risk of OHSS.
Topics: Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Humans; Hyperandrogenism; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemic Agents; Live Birth; Metformin; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
PubMed: 25406011
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006105.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2014Anovulation is a common cause of infertility. Drugs used to treat anovulation include selective oestrogen receptor modulators, aromatase inhibitors and gonadotrophins.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anovulation is a common cause of infertility. Drugs used to treat anovulation include selective oestrogen receptor modulators, aromatase inhibitors and gonadotrophins. Ovulation triggers are used with these drugs, as a surrogate for the hormonal surge seen in spontaneous menstrual cycles, to control the timing of ovulation and the timing of sexual intercourse. Ovulation triggers given without reliable evidence of oocyte maturity could be inappropriately timed; they increase costs, and the need to time intercourse precisely after the ovulation trigger is given adds to psychological stress.This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in Issue 3, 2008, of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the benefits and harms of administering an ovulation trigger to anovulatory women receiving treatment with ovulation-inducing agents in comparison with spontaneous ovulation following ovulation induction.
SEARCH METHODS
We updated searches of the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO to November 2013. We checked conference proceedings, trial registries and reference lists and contacted researchers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Parallel-group, randomised, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the administration of an ovulation trigger to anovulatory women receiving treatment with ovulation-inducing agents.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We independently assessed trial eligibility and trial quality and extracted data. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and used the random-effects model in meta-analyses when significant heterogeneity was present. We assessed overall quality of the evidence by using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
No new trials were identified. This review includes two RCTs with low risk of bias that compared urinary human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) versus no treatment in anovulatory women receiving clomiphene citrate. Urinary hCG did not result in an increase in live birth rate over no hCG (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.83; two trials, 305 participants, I(2) = 16%; low-quality evidence), but very serious imprecision around the effect estimate reduces our confidence in the apparent lack of effect of hCG as an ovulation trigger in clomiphene-induced cycles in anovulatory women.Among this review's secondary outcomes, urinary hCG may not increase ovulation rate (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.77; two trials, 305 participants, I(2) = 55%; low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy rate (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.89; two trials, 305 participants, I(2) = 35%; low-quality evidence) or miscarriage rate in pregnant women (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.17 to 8.23; two trials, 54 participants, I(2) = 0%; low-quality evidence). Multiple pregnancies and preterm deliveries were uncommon, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, adverse events and deaths were not reported as outcomes in either trial. We found no trials evaluating other ovulation triggers.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Evidence is inadequate to recommend or refute the use of urinary hCG as an ovulation trigger in anovulatory women treated with clomiphene citrate. We found no trials evaluating the use of ovulation triggers in anovulatory women treated with other ovulation-inducing agents.
Topics: Anovulation; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Clomiphene; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Humans; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproductive Control Agents
PubMed: 24482059
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006900.pub3 -
Fertility and Sterility Jul 2013To summarize the evidence for the use of commonly accepted fertility tests in subfertile women with ovulation problems. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the evidence for the use of commonly accepted fertility tests in subfertile women with ovulation problems.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
SETTING
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S)
The study population included women starting with clomiphene citrate (CC) as first-line treatment, women starting with second-line treatment if CC failed to result in pregnancy, and women starting with second-line treatment if CC failed to result in ovulation (CC resistant).
INTERVENTION(S)
Performance of a semen analysis or tubal patency test before or during treatment.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
Prevalence of abnormal tests as well as the diagnostic and prognostic performance of these tests.
RESULT(S)
Four studies reported on 3,017 women starting with CC as first-line treatment. The prevalence of male factor infertility was 10%, and in 0.3% of couples azoospermia was found (two studies). Semen parameters were not associated with pregnancy chance (one study). The prevalence of bilateral tubal disease was 4% (two studies). Three studies reported on 462 women starting with second-line treatment if CC failed to result in a pregnancy. Semen parameters were not predictive for pregnancy (one study). The prevalence of bilateral tubal disease in these women was 8% (three studies). Two studies reported on 168 CC-resistant women and total motile sperm count did not predict live birth (two studies). For all other outcomes, no studies were available.
CONCLUSION(S)
Data on the basic fertility workup in subfertile women with anovulation are scarce. Based on the available data, the workup should contain a semen analysis, and, for women who need to start second-line treatment if CC failed to result in pregnancy or women with CC resistance, assessment of tubal patency.
Topics: Animals; Azoospermia; Female; Fertility; Humans; Infertility, Female; Male; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23582439
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.015 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2012Irregular menstrual bleeding may arise due to exogenous sex steroids, lesions of the genital tract or be associated with anovulation. Irregular bleeding due to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Irregular menstrual bleeding may arise due to exogenous sex steroids, lesions of the genital tract or be associated with anovulation. Irregular bleeding due to oligo/anovulation (previously called dysfunctional uterine bleeding or DUB) is more common at the extremes of reproductive life, and in women with ovulatory disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). In anovulatory cycles there may be prolonged oestrogen stimulation of the endometrium without progesterone withdrawal and so cycles are irregular and bleeding may be heavy. This is the rationale for using cyclical progestogens during the second half of the menstrual cycle, in order to provoke a regular withdrawal bleed. Continuous progestogen is intended to induce endometrial atrophy and hence to prevent oestrogen-stimulated endometrial proliferation. Progestogens, and oestrogens and progestogens in combination, are widely used in the management of irregular menstrual bleeding, but the regime, dose and type of progestogen used vary widely, with little consensus about the optimum treatment approach.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effectiveness and acceptability of progestogens alone or in combination with oestrogens in the regulation of irregular menstrual bleeding associated with oligo/anovulation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases in February 2012: Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and reference lists of articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials of progestogens (via any route) alone or in combination with oestrogens in the treatment of irregular menstrual bleeding associated with oligo/anovulation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Study quality assessment and data extraction were carried out independently by two review authors. All authors were experts in the content of this review.
MAIN RESULTS
No randomised trials were identified that compared progestogens with oestrogens and progestogens or with placebo in the management of irregular bleeding associated with oligo/anovulation.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is a paucity of randomised studies relating to the use of progestogens and of oestrogens and progestogens in combination in the treatment of irregular menstrual bleeding associated with anovulation. There is no consensus about which regimens are most effective. Further research is needed to establish the role of these hormonal treatments in the management of this common gynaecological problem.
Topics: Adult; Anovulation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estrogens; Female; Humans; Menorrhagia; Progestins
PubMed: 22972055
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001895.pub3 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Nov 2010About 17% of couples in industrialised countries seek help for infertility, which may be caused by ovulatory failure, tubal damage or endometriosis, or a low sperm... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
About 17% of couples in industrialised countries seek help for infertility, which may be caused by ovulatory failure, tubal damage or endometriosis, or a low sperm count. In developed countries, 80% to 90% of couples attempting to conceive are successful after 1 year and 95% after 2 years.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for infertility caused by ovulation disorders? What are the effects of treatments for tubal infertility? What are the effects of treatments for infertility associated with endometriosis? What are the effects of treatments for unexplained infertility? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to October 2009 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 55 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: clomifene; drug-induced ovarian suppression; gonadotrophin priming of oocytes before in vitro maturation; gonadotrophins; gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists plus gonadotrophins; gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists; in vitro fertilisation; intrauterine insemination alone, or combined with gonadotrophins or clomifene; laparoscopic ablation of endometrial deposits; laparoscopic ovarian drilling; laparoscopic removal; metformin; ovarian wedge biopsy; pulsatile gonadotrophin-releasing hormone; selective salpingography plus tubal catheterisation; tamoxifen; tubal flushing; and tubal surgery before in vitro fertilisation.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anovulation; Clomiphene; Female; Humans; Infertility; Infertility, Female; Ovulation Induction; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
PubMed: 21406133
DOI: No ID Found -
Fertility and Sterility Feb 2009To review all available data and recommend a definition for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) based on published peer-reviewed data, whether already in use or not, to... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To review all available data and recommend a definition for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) based on published peer-reviewed data, whether already in use or not, to guide clinical diagnosis and future research.
DESIGN
Literature review and expert consensus.
SETTING
Professional society.
PATIENTS
None.
INTERVENTION(S)
None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)
A systematic review of the published peer-reviewed medical literature, by querying MEDLINE databases, to identify studies evaluating the epidemiology or phenotypic aspects of PCOS.
RESULT(S)
The Task Force drafted the initial report, following a consensus process via electronic communication, which was then reviewed and critiqued by the Androgen Excess and PCOS (AE-PCOS) Society AE-PCOS Board of Directors. No section was finalized until all members were satisfied with the contents, and minority opinions noted. Statements were not included that were not supported by peer-reviewed evidence.
CONCLUSION(S)
Based on the available data, it is the view of the AE-PCOS Society Task Force that PCOS should be defined by the presence of hyperandrogenism (clinical and/or biochemical), ovarian dysfunction (oligo-anovulation and/or polycystic ovaries), and the exclusion of related disorders. However, a minority considered the possibility that there may be forms of PCOS without overt evidence of hyperandrogenism, but recognized that more data are required before validating this supposition. Finally, the Task Force recognized and fully expects that the definition of this syndrome will evolve over time to incorporate new research findings.
Topics: Biomarkers; Diagnosis, Differential; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Health Status Indicators; Humans; Hyperandrogenism; Menstruation Disturbances; Ovarian Function Tests; Ovary; Ovulation; Phenotype; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Predictive Value of Tests; Terminology as Topic
PubMed: 18950759
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035 -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Oct 2003To assess the effectiveness of metformin in improving clinical and biochemical features of polycystic ovary syndrome. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness of metformin in improving clinical and biochemical features of polycystic ovary syndrome.
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Randomised controlled trials that investigated the effect of metformin compared with either placebo or no treatment, or compared with an ovulation induction agent.
SELECTION OF STUDIES
13 trials were included for analysis, including 543 women with polycystic ovary syndrome that was defined by using biochemical or ultrasound evidence.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Pregnancy and ovulation rates. Secondary outcomes of clinical and biochemical features of polycystic ovary syndrome.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis showed that metformin is effective in achieving ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, with odds ratios of 3.88 (95% confidence interval 2.25 to 6.69) for metformin compared with placebo and 4.41 (2.37 to 8.22) for metformin and clomifene compared with clomifene alone. An analysis of pregnancy rates shows a significant treatment effect for metformin and clomifene (odds ratio 4.40, 1.96 to 9.85). Metformin has an effect in reducing fasting insulin concentrations, blood pressure, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. We found no evidence of any effect on body mass index or waist:hip ratio. Metformin was associated with a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal disturbance.
CONCLUSIONS
Metformin is an effective treatment for anovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Its choice as a first line agent seems justified, and there is some evidence of benefit on variables of the metabolic syndrome. No data are available regarding the safety of metformin in long term use in young women and only limited data on its safety in early pregnancy. It should be used as an adjuvant to general lifestyle improvements and not as a replacement for increased exercise and improved diet.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Humans; Insulin; Lipids; Metformin; Ovulation; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 14576245
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7421.951