-
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology :... Sep 2015The primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) in fetuses with Down syndrome. Secondary objectives were to assess the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The primary objective was to estimate the prevalence of aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) in fetuses with Down syndrome. Secondary objectives were to assess the prevalence of ARSA in euploid fetuses, the feasibility of ultrasound evaluation of the right subclavian artery (RSA) in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, the performance of ARSA in screening for trisomy 21 and its association with other abnormalities.
METHODS
Web-based databases (PubMed, EMBASE and MEDLINE) were searched up to July 2014. The STROBE, PRISMA and QUIPS instruments were used to assess all included studies and for reporting of methodology, results and conclusions. Original studies that reported prenatal ultrasound evaluation of ARSA, assessment of its prevalence in Down-syndrome and euploid fetuses, feasibility of ultrasound evaluation of the RSA in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy and correlation of ARSA with other abnormalities were included, excluding duplications and case reports. Collected data were summarized to estimate prevalence and feasibility. A meta-analysis was performed pooling the study-specific positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), detection rates and false-positive rates for trisomy 21.
RESULTS
Prevalence of ARSA in Down-syndrome fetuses was 23.6% (95% CI, 19.4-27.9%), whereas in euploid fetuses it was 1.02% (95% CI, 0.86-1.10%). Ultrasound evaluation of the RSA course and origin in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy was feasible in 85% and 98% of cases (first and second trimester, respectively) and it was directly related to sonographic experience and fetal crown-rump length and inversely related to maternal body mass index. In more than 20% of fetuses with ARSA there was an association with other abnormalities but ARSA seemed to be an independent marker of trisomy 21. The meta-analysis showed that ARSA is a significant risk factor for Down syndrome (pooled LR+ = 26.93, 95% CI, 19.36-37.47, P for effect < 0.001, P for Q = 0.3, I(2) = 17.3%), whereas normal RSA is a significant protective marker (pooled LR- = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.51-0.99, P for effect = 0.043, P for Q = 0.9, I(2) = 0%).
CONCLUSIONS
ARSA appears to be a clinically useful prenatal ultrasound marker of Down syndrome. Additional testing when ARSA is diagnosed should involve evaluation of all risk factors by applying a mathematical model. There is insufficient evidence to recommend fetal karyotyping in cases with isolated ARSA. If the background risk is higher or additional markers are present, full fetal karyotyping is advisable, including analysis for 22q11 microdeletion.
Topics: Aneurysm; Cardiovascular Abnormalities; Deglutition Disorders; Down Syndrome; Female; Humans; Models, Statistical; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Prevalence; Subclavian Artery; Ultrasonography, Prenatal
PubMed: 25586729
DOI: 10.1002/uog.14774 -
Minerva Anestesiologica Dec 2014A systematic review of the published literature clearly demonstrates the usefulness of thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in detecting coagulation disorders in severe trauma,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
A systematic review of the published literature clearly demonstrates the usefulness of thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) in detecting coagulation disorders in severe trauma, cardiac and aortic surgery, liver transplantation, and postpartum haemorrhage reliably and within a clinically acceptable turn-around time. In all of the above-mentioned scenarios, the transfusion of any allogeneic blood products could be reduced significantly using ROTEM®-guided bleeding management, thereby minimising or avoiding transfusion-related side effects. Based on the current body of evidence as assessed by the GRADE system, the use of ROTEM® may be recommended in particular for management of severe bleeding after trauma and during cardiac and aortic surgery. However, as laboratory testing contributes only one part of severe bleeding management, the implementation of safe and effective treatment algorithms must be ensured at the same time.
Topics: Blood Transfusion; Critical Care; Critical Illness; Hemorrhage; Hemostasis; Humans; Thrombelastography
PubMed: 24518216
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Jan 2014To provide a systematic review of the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) and to identify prognostic factors... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To provide a systematic review of the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) and to identify prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes.
METHODS
Literature searches of the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases identified relevant articles reporting results of TEVAR for AEF. The main outcome measure was the composite of aortic mortality, recurrence of the AEF, and stent graft explantation. The secondary outcome measure was aortic-related mortality.
RESULTS
Fifty-five articles were integrated after a literature search identified 72 patients treated by TEVAR for AEFs. The technical success rate of TEVAR was 87.3%. The overall 30-day mortality was 19.4%. Prolonged antibiotics (>4 weeks) were administered in 80% of patients. Concomitant or staged resection or repair of the esophagus was performed in 44.4% of patients. Stent graft explantation was performed within the first month after TEVAR as a planned treatment in 11.1%. After a mean follow-up of 7.4 months (range, 1-33 months), the all-cause mortality was 40.2%, and the aortic-related mortality was 33.3. Prolonged antibiotic treatment (P = .001) and repair of AEFs due to a foreign body (P = .038) were associated with a significant lower aortic mortality. On univariate analysis, TEVAR and concomitant or staged adjunctive procedures (resection, repair of the esophagus, or a planned stent graft explantation) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of aortic-related mortality (P = .0121). When entered into a binary logistic regression analysis, prolonged antibiotic treatment was the only factor associated with a significant lower incidence of the endpoint (P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS
Late infection or recurrence of the AEF and associated mortality rates are high when TEVAR is used as a sole therapeutic strategy. Prolonged antibiotic treatment has a strong negative association with mortality. A strategy of a temporizing endovascular procedure to stabilize the patient in extremis, and upon recovery, an open surgical esophageal repair with or without stent graft explantation is advocated.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Diseases; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Chi-Square Distribution; Device Removal; Endovascular Procedures; Esophageal Fistula; Female; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Recurrence; Reoperation; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Fistula
PubMed: 24199764
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.07.117 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Jan 2011More than half of painless solid swellings of the body of the testis are malignant, with a peak incidence in men aged 25 to 35 years. Most testicular cancers are germ... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
More than half of painless solid swellings of the body of the testis are malignant, with a peak incidence in men aged 25 to 35 years. Most testicular cancers are germ cell tumours and half of these are seminomas, which tend to affect older men and have a good prognosis.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments in men with stage 1 seminoma (confined to testis) who have undergone orchidectomy? What are the effects of treatments in men with good-prognosis non-stage 1 seminoma who have undergone orchidectomy? What are the effects of maintenance chemotherapy in men who are in remission after orchidectomy and chemotherapy for good-prognosis non-stage 1 seminoma? What are the effects of treatments in men with intermediate-prognosis seminoma who have undergone orchidectomy? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 29 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: chemotherapy (maintenance, adjuvant, single-agent carboplatin, 3 or 4 cycles, different number of cycles of adjuvant, using bleomycin added to vinblastine plus cisplatin, using etoposide plus cisplatin with or without bleomycin, adding higher doses to a 2-drug chemotherapy regimen using cisplatin or vinblastine); radiotherapy (different adjuvant regimens [20 Gy in 10 fractions to para-aortic area, 30 Gy in 15 fractions to para-aortic area and iliac nodes], different drug combinations, 30-36 Gy in 15-18 fractions); and surveillance.
Topics: Carboplatin; Humans; Orchiectomy; Prognosis; Seminoma; Testicular Neoplasms
PubMed: 21477387
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of the Saudi Heart Association Oct 2010Patients referred for aortic valve replacement are often elderly and may have increased surgical risk associated with ascending aortic calcification, left ventricular...
Patients referred for aortic valve replacement are often elderly and may have increased surgical risk associated with ascending aortic calcification, left ventricular dysfunction, presence of coronary artery disease, previous surgery, and/or presence of several co-morbidities. Some of these patients may not be considered candidates for conventional surgery because of their high risk profile. While transcatheter aortic valve replacement constitutes a widely accepted alternative, some patients may not be eligible for this modality due to anatomic factors. Apico-Aortic Conduit (AAC) insertion (aortic valve bypass surgery) constitutes a possible option in those patients. Apico-Aortic Conduit is not a new technique, as it has been used for decades in both pediatric and adult populations. However, there is a resurging interest in this technique due to the expanding scope of elderly patients being considered for the treatment of aortic stenosis. Herein, we describe our surgical technique and provide a systematic review of recent publications on AAC insertion, reporting that there is continued use and several modifications of this technique, such as performing it through a small thoracotomy without the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass.
PubMed: 23960619
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsha.2010.06.003 -
European Journal of Vascular and... Jul 2009Sizing of aortic endografts is an essential step in successful endovascular treatment of aortic pathology, although consensus regarding the optimal sizing strategy is... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Sizing of aortic endografts is an essential step in successful endovascular treatment of aortic pathology, although consensus regarding the optimal sizing strategy is lacking. Some proximal oversizing is necessary to obtain a seal between the stent graft and the aortic wall and to prevent the graft from migrating, but excessive oversizing might influence the results negatively. In this systematic review, we investigated the current literature to obtain an overview of the risks and benefits of oversizing and to determine the optimal degree of oversizing of stent grafts used for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
METHODS
PUBMED, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles related to the impact of proximal endograft oversizing on complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. After in- and exclusion, 23 relevant articles reporting on 8415 patients remained for analysis and critical appraisal.
RESULTS
Most studies that investigated neck dilatation are flawed by poor methodology. No clear relationship between proximal oversizing and neck dilatation relative to the first post-operative scan was found. None of the studies described a positive relationship between the degree of oversizing and the incidence of endoleaks. On the contrary, oversizing up to 25% seems to decrease the risk of proximal endoleaks. There are conflicting data regarding the risk of graft migration when oversizing by more than 30%.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the best available evidence, the current standard of 10-20% oversizing regime appears to be relatively safe and preferable. Oversizing >30% might negatively impact the outcome after EVAR. Studies of higher quality are needed to further assess the relationship between proximal oversizing and the incidence of complications, particularly regarding the impact on aneurysm neck dilatation.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Foreign-Body Migration; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents
PubMed: 19428273
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.03.025