-
BMC Surgery Mar 2024The anastomosis of donor and recipient hepatic arteries is standard in liver transplantations. For transplant recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, appropriate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The anastomosis of donor and recipient hepatic arteries is standard in liver transplantations. For transplant recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, appropriate artery selection should be conducted using evidence-based considerations; therefore, this network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to analyze the most suitable alternative recipient artery for anastomosis during liver transplantations.
METHODS
Comprehensive searches of the Scopus, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were conducted to analyze observational studies containing non-standard anastomoses in liver transplantations that used the splenic artery, aorta, celiac, or branches of the gastric artery. The outcome parameters included intraoperative components, complications, and survival data. This NMA used the BUGSnet package in R studio and the results were presented in a Forest plot, league table, and SUCRA plot.
RESULTS
Among the 13 studies included in this NMA, 5 arteries were used for the anastomoses. The splenic artery anastomosis showed a high risk of thrombosis and a low risk of stenosis (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.13-3.14) and biliary tract abnormalities (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.36-1.55). In addition, the graft survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.96-1.23) and overall survival (1-year survival OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94-1.26; 5-year survival OR 1.95% CI 0.83-1.22) showed favorable results using this artery. Constraints to the use of the splenic artery were longer operation and cold ischemic times. However, the duration of hospital stay (MD 1.36, 95% CI -7.47 to 10.8) was shorter than that when the other arteries were used, and the need for blood transfusions was minimal (MD -1.74, 95% CI -10.2 to 6.7).
CONCLUSION
In recipients with unusable hepatic arteries, the splenic artery of the patient should be the first consideration for anastomosis selection in liver transplantations.
Topics: Humans; Hepatic Artery; Liver Transplantation; Bayes Theorem; Network Meta-Analysis; Anastomosis, Surgical; Living Donors
PubMed: 38521948
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02385-4 -
BMC Anesthesiology Mar 2024Anemia can lead to secondary brain damage by reducing arterial oxygen content and brain oxygen supply. Patients with acute brain injury have impaired self-regulation.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Anemia can lead to secondary brain damage by reducing arterial oxygen content and brain oxygen supply. Patients with acute brain injury have impaired self-regulation. Brain hypoxia may also occur even in mild anemia. Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is associated with increased postoperative complications, poor neurological recovery, and mortality in critically ill neurologic patients. Balancing the risks of anemia and red blood cell transfusion-associated adverse effects is challenging in neurocritical settings.
METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, and MEDLINE (PubMed) from inception to January 31, 2024. We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing liberal versus restrictive RBC transfusion strategies in neurocritical patients. We included all relevant studies published in English. The primary outcome was mortality at intensive care unit (ICU), discharge, and six months.
RESULTS
Of 5195 records retrieved, 84 full-text articles were reviewed, and five eligible studies were included. There was no significant difference between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups in ICU mortality (RR: 2.53, 95% CI: 0.53 to 12.13), in-hospital mortality (RR: 2.34, 95% CI: 0.50 to 11.00), mortality at six months (RR: 1.42, 95% CI: 0.42 to 4.78) and long-term mortality (RR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.64 to 2.33). The occurrence of neurological adverse events and most major non-neurological complications was similar in the two groups. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis was lower in the restrictive strategy group (RR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.91).
CONCLUSIONS
Due to the small sample size of current studies, the evidence is insufficiently robust to confirm definitive conclusions for neurocritical patients. Therefore, further investigation is encouraged to define appropriate RBC transfusion thresholds in the neurocritical setting.
Topics: Humans; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Anemia; Blood Transfusion; Postoperative Complications; Oxygen
PubMed: 38504153
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02487-9 -
Reumatologia Clinica Mar 2024This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of thromboembolic events in children and adolescents with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of thromboembolic events in children and adolescents with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS).
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science to select relevant articles published between 1 January 2000 and 27 February 2022. We used the random-effects meta-analysis to estimate pooled point prevalence rates of thromboembolic events in studies with a minimum sample size of 30.
RESULTS
We included five studies reporting data of 336 children and adolescents with primary APS and secondary APS (SAPS). Pooled point prevalence rates of initial general thrombosis, arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis and stroke in individuals with seropositive APS were 98.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.5-100), 27.6% (95% CI 21.4-34.2), 51.1% (95% CI 38.2-63.9) and 13.4% 95% CI (6.3-22.7), respectively. Pooled point prevalence rates of initial arterial and venous thromboses in children and adolescents with SAPS were 45.7% (95% CI 21.1-71.6) and 29.2% (95% CI 14.8-46), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Arterio-venous thromboembolism is highly frequent in children and adolescents with SAPS. More studies using thrombotic and non-thrombotic APS classification criteria are warranted to better assess the frequency and predictors of thromboembolism in age- and ancestry-diverse pediatric populations affected by different types of APS.
Topics: Child; Humans; Adolescent; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Thrombosis; Venous Thrombosis; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 38494306
DOI: 10.1016/j.reumae.2023.10.005 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2024Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication and an obstacle to treatment, with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. There is still no global...
BACKGROUND
Portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is a common complication and an obstacle to treatment, with a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis. There is still no global consensus or standard guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with PVTT. Increasing evidence suggests that more aggressive treatment modalities, including transarterial chemoembolization, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and various combination therapies, may improve the prognosis and prolong the survival of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) patients with PVTT. We aim to comprehensively review and compare the efficacy and safety of these advanced options for aHCC with PVTT.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed and EMBASE for phase II or III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating multimodality treatments for aHCC with PVTT. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were constructed to retrieve individual patient-level data to strengthen the comparison of the benefits of all multimodality treatments of interest. Each study was pooled in a fixed-effects network meta-analysis (NMA). We also conducted subgroup analyses using risk ratios extracted from each study, including viral etiology, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, macrovascular invasion or portal vein tumor thrombosis, and extrahepatic spread. Multimodality treatments were ranked using SUCRA scores.
RESULTS
We identified 15 randomized controlled trials with 16 multimodality regimens that met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 5,236 patients with OS results and 5,160 patients with PFS results were included in the analysis. The hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (HAIC-FO) showed OS and PFS benefits over all the other therapies. In terms of OS, HAIC-FO, nivolumab, and TACE+Len were superior to sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donatinib monotherapies, as well as HAIC-FO+Sor. In terms of PFS, TACE+Len showed better benefits than lenvatinib, donatinib, and tremelimumab+durvalumab. A low heterogeneity ( < 50%) and consistency were observed. The SUCRA score for OS ranked HAIC-FO+sorafenib as the best treatment option among all multimodality treatments in hepatitis B, MVI, or PVTT with EHS and AFP 400 μg/L subgroups.
CONCLUSION
HAIC-FO and HAIC-FO+sorafenib are statistically better options for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with PVTT among the multimodality treatments, and their effective and safe implementation may provide the best outcomes for HCC-PVTT patients.
PubMed: 38434681
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1344798 -
Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy Feb 2024The clinical manifestation of foetal anaemia caused by maternal Kell alloantibodies differs from that caused by non-Kell alloantibodies. Severe anaemia develops in the... (Review)
Review
The role of measuring peak systolic velocity of the middle cerebral artery blood flow and anti-K1 titre during pregnancy to detect foetuses with severe anaemia, foetal hydrops, and the requirement of intrauterine transfusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The clinical manifestation of foetal anaemia caused by maternal Kell alloantibodies differs from that caused by non-Kell alloantibodies. Severe anaemia develops in the foetus in the early weeks of gestation; therefore, proper management and early intervention are important. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine whether the anti-K1 titre can determine the sequelae of Kell alloimmunised pregnancies. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies were used to conduct a systematic review following a comprehensive literature search, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were screened based on a defined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 5143 potential articles were identified. Ten studies were used in the meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes for a specific anti-K1 titre cut-off. The meta-analysis identified statistical significance for intrauterine transfusion (ARD: 0.351; 95 % CI: 0.593-0.109; p-value = 0.004), hydrops (ARD: 0.808; 95 % CI: 1.145-0.472; p-value <0.001), intrauterine foetal death (ARD: 0.938; 95 % CI:1.344 to -0.533; p-value <0.001) and intrauterine transfusion for Doppler middle cerebral artery >1.5 MoM (ARD: 0.381; 95 % CI:1.079 to -0.317; p-value = 0.285). It was concluded that there is no correlation between anti-K1 titre and Kell sensitised pregnancy outcomes, but monitoring the anti-K1 titre is important to manage the pregnancy and it helps clinicians determine the need for intrauterine transfusions. Doppler middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity is strongly correlated with foetal anaemia and is an efficient routine method for determining the need for intrauterine transfusions in pregnancies affected by anti-K1.
PubMed: 38429195
DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2024.02.002 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease Jan 2024Women with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are at an increased risk of arterial and venous thromboembolic events. The review summarizes the evidence on the incidence of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Women with peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are at an increased risk of arterial and venous thromboembolic events. The review summarizes the evidence on the incidence of thromboembolic complications in women with PPCM, diagnostic approaches, related outcomes, and effects of therapies that have been used.
METHODS
English articles were retrieved from Web of Science and PubMed using search terms to capture studies related to PPCM (or postpartum cardiomyopathy) and all combinations of thrombosis- and embolism-related keywords. A total of 347 articles from PubMed and 85 from Web of Science were obtained, and after removing duplicates, 327 articles were screened for original data and classified into four domains: epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and therapy of thromboembolism in PPCM. Ultimately, 30 articles were included. Data were synthesized in summary tables for each domain.
RESULTS
Studies in the United States and Europe reported varying incidence for thromboembolism in PPCM, up to 14% in 6 months. Risk factors include elevated levels of coagulation factors, decreased protein C and S activity, decreased fibrinolysis, and a low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Cesarean delivery and post-operative status were correlated with a higher incidence of thromboembolic complications. Diagnosis relied mostly on ultrasonography and magnetic resonance and depended on the suspected location of thrombus. Anticoagulation has been used mostly for PPCM patients with a reduced LVEF, with the duration varying across guidelines and healthcare systems. Unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were considered safe choices during pregnancy, while warfarin and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were used postpartum. The association of bromocriptine with risk of thromboembolic complications remains debated.
CONCLUSIONS
There are important gaps in our understanding of the epidemiology, risk stratification, and optimal secondary prevention of thromboembolism in PPCM. Larger prospective studies with detailed phenotyping are required.
PubMed: 38410599
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-945 -
Nursing Reports (Pavia, Italy) Feb 2024Situations involving increased workloads and stress (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic) underline the need for healthcare professionals to minimize patient complications. In... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Situations involving increased workloads and stress (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic) underline the need for healthcare professionals to minimize patient complications. In the field of vascular access, tunneling techniques are a possible solution. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of tunneled Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (tPICCs) to conventional Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (cPICCs) in terms of bleeding, overall success, procedural time, and late complications.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials without language restrictions were searched using PUBMED, EMBASE, EBSCO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register from August 2022 to August 2023. Five relevant papers (1238 patients) were included.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in overall success and nerve or artery injuries between the two groups ( = 0.62 and = 0.62, respectively), although cPICCs caused slightly less bleeding (0.23 mL) and had shorter procedural times (2.95 min). On the other hand, tPICCs had a significantly reduced risk of overall complications ( < 0.001; RR0.41 [0.31-0.54] CI 95%), catheter-related thrombosis ( < 0.001; RR0.35 [0.20-0.59] IC 95%), infection-triggering catheter removal ( < 0.001; RR0.33 [0.18-0.61] IC 95%), wound oozing ( < 0.001; RR0.49 [0.37-0.64] IC 95%), and dislodgement ( < 0.001; RR0.4 [0.31-0.54] CI 95%).
CONCLUSIONS
The tunneling technique for brachial access appears to be safe concerning intra-procedural bleeding, overall success, and procedural time, and it is effective in reducing the risk of late complications associated with catheterization.
PubMed: 38391080
DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14010035 -
Circulation Apr 2024Results from multiple randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes after intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Coronary Angiography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Optical Coherence Tomography for Guiding of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Results from multiple randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes after intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)- and optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with invasive coronary angiography (ICA)-guided PCI as well as a pivotal trial comparing the 2 intravascular imaging (IVI) techniques have provided mixed results.
METHODS
Major electronic databases were searched to identify eligible trials evaluating at least 2 PCI guidance strategies among ICA, IVUS, and OCT. The 2 coprimary outcomes were target lesion revascularization and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes included ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, death, cardiac death, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiac events. Frequentist random-effects network meta-analyses were conducted. The results were replicated by Bayesian random-effects models. Pairwise meta-analyses of the direct components, multiple sensitivity analyses, and pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA were supplemented.
RESULTS
The results from 24 randomized trials (15 489 patients: IVUS versus ICA, 46.4%, 7189 patients; OCT versus ICA, 32.1%, 4976 patients; OCT versus IVUS, 21.4%, 3324 patients) were included in the network meta-analyses. IVUS was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization compared with ICA (odds ratio [OR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.54-0.87]), whereas no significant differences were observed between OCT and ICA (OR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.63-1.09]) and OCT and IVUS (OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.88-1.66]). Myocardial infarction did not significantly differ between guidance strategies (IVUS versus ICA: OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.70-1.19]; OCT versus ICA: OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.68-1.11]; OCT versus IVUS: OR, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.69-1.33]). These results were consistent with the secondary outcomes of ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization, and sensitivity analyses generally did not reveal inconsistency. OCT was associated with a significant reduction of stent thrombosis compared with ICA (OR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.26-0.92]) but only in the frequentist analysis. Similarly, the results in terms of survival between IVUS or OCT and ICA were uncertain across analyses. A total of 25 randomized trials (17 128 patients) were included in the pairwise meta-analyses IVI versus ICA where IVI guidance was associated with reduced target lesion revascularization, cardiac death, and stent thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS
IVI-guided PCI was associated with a reduction in ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization compared with ICA-guided PCI, with the difference most evident for IVUS. In contrast, no significant differences in myocardial infarction were observed between guidance strategies.
Topics: Humans; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Angiography; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Network Meta-Analysis; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Bayes Theorem; Ultrasonography, Interventional; Myocardial Infarction; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38344859
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.067583 -
Journal of Oral Biology and... 2024Arterial anastomoses are still most commonly performed using orthodox hand sewing technique. Various rationale such as non-pliable, atherosclerotic, thick-walled or... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arterial anastomoses are still most commonly performed using orthodox hand sewing technique. Various rationale such as non-pliable, atherosclerotic, thick-walled or irradiated vessels limit the competency of coupler devices for arterial micro-anastomosis. Microvascular coupling devices (MCD) are well known for venous anastomoses but arterial MCD have relatively been less navigated in reported literatures. This review outlines the current applications, troubleshooting, safety and efficiency of arterial MCD in free flaps.
METHODS
Comprehensive search of electronic databases (PUBMED/MEDLINE) in accordance with PRISMA guideline was performed. Data were extracted and collected in four groups of standardised variables.
RESULTS
Out of a total of 263 identified articles, 38 studies were analysed and 16 amidst these were included in final data synthesis. Included studies contained a combined total of 2416 patients who went through 521 arterial and 2460 venous anastomoses using 3 M/Synovis coupling devices. Among all coupled arterial anastomoses, 407 were conducted in head and neck free tissue transfer and 114 were performed in breast reconstruction. The aggregate coupled arterial micro-anastomosis success rate reported was 90.01 % (469/521). Only 9.98 % (52 out of 521) manifested pooled incidence of troubleshooting, thrombosis or flap failure.
CONCLUSION
Microsurgeons are resisting the frequent use of arterial coupling devices owing to inherent arterial characteristics, but with suitable vessel selection, arterial coupling may be a powerful tool and can be executed in safe, expeditious and reliable fashion. This study embellishes collaborative suggestions and troubleshooting issues related to arterial coupling, however further assessment would be required with controlled trials.
PubMed: 38313578
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.005 -
PloS One 2024Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may predispose patients to thrombotic disease in the venous and arterial circulations. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may predispose patients to thrombotic disease in the venous and arterial circulations.
METHODS
Based on the current debate on antiplatelet therapy in COVID-19 patients, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effect of antiplatelet treatments. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science on February 1, 2023, and only included Randomized clinical trials. The study followed PRISMA guidelines and used Random-effects models to estimate the pooled percentage and its 95% CI.
RESULTS
Five unique eligible studies were included, covering 17,950 patients with COVID-19. The result showed no statistically significant difference in the relative risk of all-cause death in antiplatelet therapy versus non-antiplatelet therapy (RR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.83-1.05, P = 0.26, I2 = 32%). Compared to no antiplatelet therapy, patients who received antiplatelet therapy had a significantly increased relative risk of major bleeding (RR 1.81, 95%CI 1.09-3.00, P = 0.02, I2 = 16%). The sequential analysis suggests that more RCTs are needed to draw more accurate conclusions. This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the use of antiplatelet agents exhibited no significant benefit on all-cause death, and the upper bound of the confidence interval on all-cause death (RR 95% CI, 0.83-1.05) suggested that it was unlikely to be a substantiated harm risk associated with this treatment. However, evidence from all RCTs suggested a high risk of major bleeding in antiplatelet agent treatments.
CONCLUSION
According to the results of our sequential analysis, there is not enough evidence available to support or negate the use of antiplatelet agents in COVID-19 cases. The results of ongoing and future well-designed, large, randomized clinical trials are needed.
Topics: Humans; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; COVID-19; Hemorrhage; Thrombosis
PubMed: 38300975
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297628