-
PloS One 2021Whether the circulating levels of pentraxin 3 (PTX3), an acute phase reactant (APR), are higher in active Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and if so, whether PTX3 is more... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Whether the circulating levels of pentraxin 3 (PTX3), an acute phase reactant (APR), are higher in active Takayasu arteritis (TAK), and if so, whether PTX3 is more accurate than C-reactive protein (CRP) in TAK activity assessment has been investigated in this study.
STUDY DESIGN
Research works such as PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and two Chinese literature databases (CNKI and WanFang) were searched for studies conducted till August 30th, 2019. Two investigators searched the studies independently, who evaluated the quality of the study using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and extracted data. Pooled standard mean difference (SMD) and diagnostic indexes, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated using a random-effect model.
RESULTS
Totally, 8 studies involving 473 TAK (208 active and 265 inactive TAK) patients and 252 healthy controls were eventually included in the meta-analysis. PTX3 level in the blood in active TAK patients were found to be higher than that in dormant TAK with pooled SMD of 0.761 (95% CI = 0.38-1.14, p<0.0001; I2 = 68%, p of Q test = 0.003). And there was no publication bias. Among the 8 studies, 5 studies identified active TAK with both PTX3 and CRP. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values of PTX3 in active TAK diagnosis were higher than those of CRP (0.78 [95% CI = 0.65-0.87] vs. 0.66 [95% CI = 0.53-0.77], p = 0.012; 0.85 [95% CI = 0.77-0.90] vs. 0.77 [95% CI = 0.56-0.90], p = 0.033; 0.88 [95% CI = 0.85-0.90] vs. 0.75 [95% CI = 0.71-0.79], p < 0.0001). It showed potential publication bias using Egger's test (p of PTX3 = 0.031 and p of CRP = 0.047).
CONCLUSIONS
PTX3 might be better than CRP in the assessment of TAK activity. Yet, it should be cautious before clinical use for moderate heterogeneity and potential publication bias of the meta-analysis.
Topics: C-Reactive Protein; Cross-Sectional Studies; Data Accuracy; Humans; Serum Amyloid P-Component; Takayasu Arteritis
PubMed: 33529185
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245612 -
ACR Open Rheumatology Feb 2021Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is part of a group of vasculitides commonly referred to as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated...
OBJECTIVE
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is part of a group of vasculitides commonly referred to as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), in addition to granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and renal-limited vasculitis. Patients with EGPA characteristically have asthma and marked peripheral eosinophilia with only approximately 30% to 35% of patients being myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA positive, distinguishing it from other forms of AAV (1,2). The aim of this systematic review is to support the development of the American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of EGPA.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted of the literature for seven forms of primary systemic vasculitis (GPA, MPA, EGPA, polyarteritis nodosa, Kawasaki disease, giant cell arteritis, and Takayasu arteritis). The search was done for articles in English using Ovid Medline, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Articles were screened for suitability in addressing population/patients, intervention, comparator, and outcomes (PICO) questions, with studies presenting the highest level of evidence given preference. Two independent reviewers conducted a title/abstract screen and full-text review for each eligible study.
RESULTS
The initial search, conducted in August 2019, included 13 800 articles, of which 2596 full-text articles were reviewed. There were 190 articles (addressing 34 PICO questions) reporting on the diagnosis and management of EGPA.
CONCLUSION
This comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the accuracy of commonly used tests for EGPA as well as benefits and toxicities of different treatment options.
PubMed: 33512787
DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11194 -
ACR Open Rheumatology Feb 2021Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) is a granulomatous large-vessel vasculitis primarily affecting the aorta and its proximal branches. TAK can be a difficult disease to diagnose... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) is a granulomatous large-vessel vasculitis primarily affecting the aorta and its proximal branches. TAK can be a difficult disease to diagnose and manage given the rarity of the disease as well as current limitations in biomarkers, imperfect imaging modalities, and few randomized controlled trials.
METHODS
In developing the American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of TAK, we performed an extensive systematic literature review to guide our recommendations. We included RCTs first. When RCTs were not available, we included observational studies that reported on patient-important outcomes for the intervention and comparison. When studies with comparative data were not available, we included case series that present patient-important outcomes for either the intervention or the comparison.
RESULTS
Three hundred forty-seven articles were included for full review to answer 27 population, intervention, comparison, and outcome questions related to TAK. Ten studies were evaluated that addressed the use of glucocorticoids (GCs), non-GC nonbiologic therapies, as well as biologics in treating TAK. A total of 33 studies, including 8 comparative studies, were included to determine the test accuracy of commonly available diagnostic tests for TAK.
CONCLUSION
This comprehensive systematic review synthesizes and evaluates the benefits and harms of different treatment options and the accuracy of commonly used tests for the management of TAK.
PubMed: 33512784
DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11186 -
European Review For Medical and... Jan 2021We aimed to systematically review biological agents' efficacy and safety in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to systematically review biological agents' efficacy and safety in patients with Takayasu arteritis (TAK).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic literature search of 7 electronic databases, including MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, Elsevier ScienceDirect, EBSCO, Springer Link, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library on the efficacy of biological agents on patients with TAK was conducted. Only studies published in English and with a sample size >5 patients with TAK were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed its methodological quality. Random effects meta-analyses of various effect measures were performed.
RESULTS
According to the title and abstract, 961 studies were identified and screened. Subsequently, 31 studies from 29 observational studies and 2 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs), which included a total of 517 patients with TAK that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were selected. Observational studies showed a high risk of bias. Pooled remission rates of biological agents were 66% (95% CI: 58%-73%; I2=59%), and the remission rates of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents and tocilizumab (TCZ) were similar: 65% (95% CI: 56%-73%; I2=49%) and 70% (95% CI: 55%-86%; I2=69%), respectively. Pooled relapse rates were 23% (95% CI: 15%-31%; I2=66%). The relapse rate was 28% (95% CI: 16%-40%; I2=68%) for anti-TNF agents and 17% (95% CI: 7%-26%; I2=49%) for TCZ. The remission rate of TCZ was slightly higher (p>0.05), but the relapse rate was statistically significantly lower than that of anti-TNF agents (p=0.017). Furthermore, biological agents significantly decreased the doses of glucocorticoid (GC) and levels of acute phase inflammation markers (ESR, CRP) while the proportion of patients with new angiographic lesions or progression of previously noted lesions were 11% (95% CI: 4%-18%; I2=59%). RCTs with a small sample size showed abatacept was ineffective, and TCZ was underpowered to detect a difference in time to relapse compared to placebo. The most common adverse event of biological agents was infection (6%, 95%CI: 2%-10%). No deaths were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the beneficial effects of biological agents are encouraging in enhancing disease remission, reducing the levels of acute phase inflammation markers and decreasing the treatment doses of GC in patients with TAK, there is still a risk of relapse. More refined studies with larger cohorts are necessary before drawing a definitive opinion.
Topics: Biological Factors; Humans; Takayasu Arteritis
PubMed: 33506914
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202101_24391 -
Reumatologia 2020In 1979, Bird et al. proposed depression as a diagnostic criterion for polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). More recently, the significance of depression in PMR patients has...
Depression and depressive symptoms in patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: discussion points, grey areas and unmet needs emerging from a systematic review of published literature.
OBJECTIVES
In 1979, Bird et al. proposed depression as a diagnostic criterion for polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). More recently, the significance of depression in PMR patients has been re-proposed, , and some researchers have suggested that PMR may increase the risk of depression. The aim of our article is to evaluate the relationship between PMR and depression.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Systematic literature searches were performed on 19 and 20 May 2020 based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was restricted to all studies and case reports with English abstract, published in any language, since 1979 (when depression was first proposed as a diagnostic criterion for PMR) describing the association of PMR with depression. Exclusion criteria were as follows: reviews, conference abstracts, comments, non-original articles; and articles discussing giant cell arteritis (GCA) and PMR when data and observations for the two conditions were not clearly subdivided.
RESULTS
The initial search yielded 812 papers, of which 115 duplicates were removed. A total of 697 articles had a first screening and 506 were excluded based on title and abstract reviews; 117 articles underwent full-length scrutiny, and 99 full-text articles were excluded because they did not meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria (reviews and comments = 58; articles with outcome of interest not reported = 34; low-quality articles = 7). At least, 18 articles were included in this review.
CONCLUSIONS
The review did not find any studies that clarified the prevalence rates of depression in patients with PMR. Furthermore, the studies reviewed did not offer any clarity as to whether patients suffered from just depressive symptoms or clinical depression, and that accepted diagnostic criteria for depression had not been employed, indicating that a robust method for diagnosing depression had not been employed. Collaboration of different professionals should be improved through shared guidelines.
PubMed: 33456081
DOI: 10.5114/reum.2020.102003 -
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine... Jun 2021Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) can be difficult to diagnose. Whole-body [18F]FDG-PET/CT allows for a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant articular and extra-articular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) can be difficult to diagnose. Whole-body [18F]FDG-PET/CT allows for a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant articular and extra-articular structures affected by PMR. We aimed to summarize current evidence on the diagnostic value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for a diagnosis of PMR.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library database were searched from inception through May 31, 2020. Studies containing patients with PMR who underwent [18F]FDG-PET/CT were included. Screening and full-text review were performed by 3 investigators and data extraction by 2 investigators. Risk of bias was examined with the QUADAS-2 tool. Diagnostic test meta-analysis was performed with a bivariate model.
RESULTS
Twenty studies were included in the systematic review, of which 9 studies (n = 636 patients) were eligible for meta-analysis. [18F]FDG positivity at the following sites was associated with a diagnosis of PMR: interspinous bursae (positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 4.00; 95% CI 1.84-8.71), hips (LR+ 2.91; 95% CI 2.09-4.05), ischial tuberosities (LR+ 2.86; 95% CI 1.91-4.28), shoulders (LR+ 2.57; 95% CI 1.24-5.32) and sternoclavicular joints (LR+ 2.31; 95% CI 1.33-4.02). Negative likelihood ratios (LR-) for these sites, as well as the greater trochanters, were all less than 0.50. Composite [18F]FDG-PET/CT scores, as reported in 3 studies, provided a pooled LR+ of 3.91 (95% CI 2.42-6.32) and LR- of 0.19 (95% CI 0.10-0.36). Moderate to high heterogeneity was observed across the studies, mainly due to differences in patient selection, scanning procedures and/or interpretation criteria.
CONCLUSION
Significant [18F]FDG uptake at a combination of anatomic sites is informative for a diagnosis of PMR. [18F]FDG-PET/CT might be an important diagnostic tool in patients with suspected PMR. This study also highlights the need for adherence to published procedural recommendations and standardized interpretation criteria for the use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in PMR.
Topics: Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Giant Cell Arteritis; Humans; Polymyalgia Rheumatica; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Positron-Emission Tomography; Radiopharmaceuticals
PubMed: 33372248
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05162-6 -
Journal of Neuro-ophthalmology : the... Dec 2020Administrative health claims data have been used for research in neuro-ophthalmology, but the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for...
BACKGROUND
Administrative health claims data have been used for research in neuro-ophthalmology, but the validity of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying neuro-ophthalmic conditions is unclear.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We performed a systematic literature review to assess the validity of administrative claims data for identifying patients with neuro-ophthalmic disorders. Two reviewers independently reviewed all eligible full-length articles and used a standardized abstraction form to identify ICD code-based definitions for 9 neuro-ophthalmic conditions and their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). A quality assessment of eligible studies was also performed.
RESULTS
Eleven articles that met criteria for inclusion are as follows: 3 studies of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (PPV 54%-91% and NPV 74%-85%), 2 studies of giant cell arteritis (sensitivity 30%-96% and PPV 94%), 3 studies of optic neuritis (sensitivity 76%-99%, specificity 83%-100%, PPV 25%-100%, and NPV 98%-100%), 1 study of neuromyelitis optica (sensitivity 60%, specificity 100%, PPV 43%-100%, and NPV 98%-100%), 1 study of ocular motor cranial neuropathies (PPV 98%-99%), and 2 studies of myasthenia gravis (sensitivity 53%-97%, specificity 99%-100%, PPV 5%-90%, and NPV 100%). No studies met eligibility criteria for nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, thyroid eye disease, and blepharospasm. Approximately 45.5% provided only one measure of diagnostic accuracy. Complete information about the validation cohorts, inclusion/exclusion criteria, data collection methods, and expertise of those reviewing charts for diagnostic accuracy was missing in 90.9%, 72.7%, 81.8%, and 36.4% of studies, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Few studies have reported the validity of ICD codes for neuro-ophthalmic conditions. The range of diagnostic accuracy for some disorders and study quality varied widely. This should be taken into consideration when interpreting studies of neuro-ophthalmic conditions using administrative claims data.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Eye Diseases; Humans; Neurology; Ophthalmology
PubMed: 33197163
DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000000971 -
Eye and Brain 2020Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are novel cancer therapies that may be associated with immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) and come to the attention of neuro-ophthalmologists. This systematic review aims to synthesize the reported ICI-associated IRAEs relevant to neuro-ophthalmologists to help in the diagnosis and management of these conditions.
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature indexed by MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was searched from inception to May 2020. Reporting followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Primary studies on ICIs and neuro-ophthalmic complications were included. Outcomes included number of cases and incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs.
RESULTS
Neuro-ophthalmic complications of ICIs occurred in 0.46% of patients undergoing ICI and may affect the afferent and efferent visual systems. Afferent complications include optic neuritis (12.8%), neuroretinitis (0.9%), and giant cell arteritis (3.7%). Efferent complications include myasthenia gravis (MG) (45.0%), thyroid-like eye disease (11.9%), orbital myositis (13.8%), general myositis with ptosis (7.3%), internuclear ophthalmoplegia (0.9%), opsoclonus-myoclonus-ataxia syndrome (0.9%), and oculomotor nerve palsy (0.9%). Pembrolizumab was the most common causative agent for neuro-ophthalmic complications (32.1%). Mortality was highest for MG (19.8%). Most patients (79.8%) experienced improvement or complete resolution of neuro-ophthalmic symptoms due to cessation of ICI and immunosuppression with systemic corticosteroids.
CONCLUSION
While incidence of neuro-ophthalmic IRAEs is low, clinicians involved in the care of cancer patients must be aware of their presentation to facilitate prompt recognition and management. Collaboration between oncology and neuro-ophthalmology teams is required to effectively manage patients and reduce morbidity and mortality.
PubMed: 33173368
DOI: 10.2147/EB.S277760 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Oct 2020Rare diseases (RDs) in rheumatology as a group have a high prevalence, but randomized controlled trials are hampered by their heterogeneity and low individual... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Rare diseases (RDs) in rheumatology as a group have a high prevalence, but randomized controlled trials are hampered by their heterogeneity and low individual prevalence. To survey the current evidence of pharmacotherapies for rare rheumatic diseases, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RDs in rheumatology for different pharmaco-interventions were included into this meta-analysis if there were two or more trials investigating the same RD and using the same assessment tools or outcome parameters. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PUBMED were searched up to April 2nd 2020. The overall objective of this study was to identify RCTs of RDs in rheumatology, evaluate the overall quality of these studies, outline the evidence of pharmacotherapy, and summarize recommended therapeutic regimens.
RESULTS
We screened 187 publications, and 50 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. In total, we analyzed data of 13 different RDs. We identified several sources of potential bias, such as a lack of description of blinding methods and allocation concealment, as well as small size of the study population. Meta-analysis was possible for 26 studies covering six RDs: Hunter disease, Behçet's disease, giant cell arteritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, reactive arthritis, and systemic sclerosis. The pharmacotherapies tested in these studies consisted of immunosuppressants, such as corticosteroids, methotrexate and azathioprine, or biologicals. We found solid evidence for idursulfase as a treatment for Hunter syndrome. In Behçet's disease, apremilast and IF-α showed promising results with regard to total and partial remission, and Tocilizumab with regard to relapse-free remission in giant cell arteritis. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine were equally effective in ANCA-associated vasculitis, while mepolizumab improved the efficacy of glucocorticoids. The combination of rifampicin and azithromycin showed promising results in reactive arthritis, while there was no convincing evidence for the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in systemic sclerosis.
CONCLUSION
For some diseases such as systemic sclerosis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, or Behcet's disease, higher quality trials were available. These RCTs showed satisfactory efficacies for immunosuppressants or biological drugs, except for systemic sclerosis. More high quality RCTs are urgently warranted for a wide spectrum of RDs in rheumatology.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Rare Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Rituximab
PubMed: 33129321
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01576-5 -
The Journal of Rheumatology Jul 2021To identify shared and distinct features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) to reduce diagnostic errors that could cause delays in...
OBJECTIVE
To identify shared and distinct features of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) to reduce diagnostic errors that could cause delays in correct treatment.
METHODS
Two systematic literature reviews determined the frequency of clinical features of GCA and COVID-19 in published reports. Frequencies in each disease were summarized using medians and ranges.
RESULTS
Headache was common in GCA but was also observed in COVID-19 (GCA 66%, COVID-19 10%). Jaw claudication or visual loss (43% and 26% in GCA, respectively) generally were not reported in COVID-19. Both diseases featured fatigue (GCA 38%, COVID-19 43%) and elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP] elevated in 100% of GCA, 66% of COVID-19), but platelet count was elevated in 47% of GCA but only 4% of COVID-19 cases. Cough and fever were commonly reported in COVID-19 and less frequently in GCA (cough, 63% for COVID-19 vs 12% for GCA; fever, 83% for COVID-19 vs 27% for GCA). Gastrointestinal upset was occasionally reported in COVID-19 (8%), rarely in GCA (4%). Lymphopenia was more common in COVID-19 than GCA (53% in COVID-19, 2% in GCA). Alteration of smell and taste have been described in GCA but their frequency is unclear.
CONCLUSION
Overlapping features of GCA and COVID-19 include headache, fever, elevated CRP and cough. Jaw claudication, visual loss, platelet count and lymphocyte count may be more discriminatory. Physicians should be aware of the possibility of diagnostic confusion. We have designed a simple checklist to aid evidence-based evaluation of patients with suspected GCA.
Topics: COVID-19; Diagnosis, Differential; Giant Cell Arteritis; Headache; Humans; Vision Disorders
PubMed: 33060304
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.200766