-
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and... Jun 2024There has been a call to action to enhance representation of non-white individuals in dermatology clinical trials. Investigations in differential response to treatment... (Review)
Review
There has been a call to action to enhance representation of non-white individuals in dermatology clinical trials. Investigations in differential response to treatment across populations are limited, particularly in conditions of commonality, impact, distinct presentation, and diagnosis in non-white participants, such as atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. This systematic review summarized and identified if biologic treatment outcomes in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and psoriasis varied in skin of colour (SOC) participants in phase 3 trials. MEDLINE, COCHRANE, and EMBASE databases were used to conduct the search following PROSPERO registration. Following screening of 3209 articles, 11 studies were collected with 1781 SOC participants with a mean age of 40.99 ± 6.3 years (range: 30.6-51.6 years). Male participants accounted for 76.9% (n = 1370/1781) of the sample, and Chinese, Japanese, Taiwanese, and Korean participants accounted for 64.3%, 24.2%, 4.5%, and 3.4% of participants, respectively. Participants with atopic dermatitis were treated with dupilumab (n = 216/388) and participants with psoriasis were treated with adalimumab (n = 313/1393), bimekizumab (n = 62/1393), ixekizumab (n = 13/1393), secukinumab (n = 117/1393), and ustekinumab (n = 289/1393). No significant SOC population-based outcomes were found across treatment groups. However, differences in baseline characteristics or comorbidities were found, suggesting race or ethnic background should be considered when treatment is prescribed in psoriasis or atopic dermatitis. Although no significant SOC participant differential response to treatment were found, large-scale randomized controlled trials investigating comparable treatment outcomes and stratifying results by SOC population in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis are warranted to confirm these findings.
PubMed: 38847375
DOI: 10.1177/12034754241260023 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Due to comorbidities and associated safety risks, the management of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in pediatric and adolescent patients poses significant challenges.
IMPORTANCE
Due to comorbidities and associated safety risks, the management of severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in pediatric and adolescent patients poses significant challenges.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
On Feb 29, 2024, a systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Central). No date restrictions were applied. Randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, large case series, and meta-analyses were assessed to evaluate the efficacy (or effectiveness) and/or safety of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents.
FINDINGS
A preliminary search yielded 1457 results, from which 19 unique articles with a total of 3741 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, the available data for each systemic medication are limited, and the overall quality of the included studies on conventional systemic treatments is relatively low. When Dupilumab was used as a standalone treatment, 30%-40% of infants and toddlers aged 6 months to 2 years achieved EASI-75, while 50% of patients aged 2 to 6 years achieved EASI-75. In children aged 6 to 12 years, 33.0%-59.0% of atopic dermatitis patients achieved EASI-75, and when combined with topical corticosteroids (TCS), 69.7%-74.6% achieved EASI-75. Long-term data showed EASI-75 rates ranging from 75.0% to 94.0% for this age group. For adolescents aged 12 to 18 years, 40%-71% of patients achieved EASI-75 within 12 to 16 weeks, and by week 52, 80.8% of patients achieved EASI-75.Abrocitinib treatment resulted in 68.5%-72.0% of patients achieving EASI-75. Omalizumab treatment at week 24 showed a percentage change in SCORAD scores of -12.4%. In the Methotrexate treatment group, there was a SCORAD change of -26.25% at week 12, while the Cyclosporine A group had a SCORAD change of -25.01%. Patients treated with IVIG (Intravenous Immunoglobulin) showed a -34.4% change in SCORAD percentage scores at week 4, which further decreased by 47.12% at week 24. Patients receiving 4mg of Baricitinib and TCS had a 52.5% rate of EASI-75 at 16 weeks, and patients receiving different doses of upadacitinib had a 63-75% rate of EASI-75 at 16 weeks. The rate of EASI-75 at 16 weeks was around 28% in patients who received various doses of Tralokinumab.The most common adverse events observed were nasopharyngitis, respiratory events and dermatitis atopic.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Awareness of adverse events and concomitant medications is crucial, and appropriate dosing and frequent laboratory and clinical monitoring are also essential. More real-world evidence and prospective cohort studies analyzing the effectiveness and safety of systemic therapies in children and adolescents are of paramount importance for optimizing personalized, effective, and safe management of the growing population of patients with atopic dermatitis in this age group.
Topics: Humans; Dermatitis, Atopic; Child; Adolescent; Child, Preschool; Treatment Outcome; Severity of Illness Index; Infant; Female; Male; Dermatologic Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
PubMed: 38812522
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1367099 -
Postepy Dermatologii I Alergologii Apr 2024
PubMed: 38784925
DOI: 10.5114/ada.2024.138659 -
Acta Dermato-venereologica May 2024Telemedicine, the provision of remote healthcare, has gained prominence, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It has the potential to replace routine in-person...
Telemedicine, the provision of remote healthcare, has gained prominence, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. It has the potential to replace routine in-person follow-up visits for patients with chronic inflammatory skin conditions. However, it remains unclear whether telemedicine can effectively substitute in-person consultations for this patient group. This systematic review assessed the effectiveness and safety of telemedicine compared with traditional in-person care for chronic inflammatory skin diseases. A comprehensive search in various databases identified 11 articles, including 5 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 clinical controlled trial (CCT). These studies evaluated telemedicine's impact on patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, with varying methods like video consultations and digital platforms. The findings tentatively suggest that telemedicine does not seem to be inferior compared with in-person care, particularly in terms of condition severity and quality of life for patients with chronic inflammatory skin diseases. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the inherent uncertainties in the evidence. There are indications that telemedicine can offer benefits such as cost-effectiveness, time savings, and reduced travel distances, but it is important to recognize these findings as preliminary, necessitating further validation through more extensive research.
Topics: Humans; Telemedicine; COVID-19; Chronic Disease; Psoriasis; Quality of Life; Dermatitis, Atopic; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 38751176
DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.23901 -
Acta Dermato-venereologica May 2024Immunocompromised individuals, primarily attributable to using immunosuppressants, face heightened COVID-19 risks. Despite the proven efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Immunocompromised individuals, primarily attributable to using immunosuppressants, face heightened COVID-19 risks. Despite the proven efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, their impact on patients with immune-mediated dermatological diseases remains unclear. This study aims to thoroughly examine vaccine immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety in immune-mediated dermatological disease patients. Clinical studies in adults that compared vaccinated immune-mediated dermatological disease patients with vaccinated healthy controls or unvaccinated immune-mediated dermatological disease patients in terms of vaccine immunogenicity, COVID-19 infection, adverse events, or exacerbation of immune-mediated dermatological diseases were searched via electronic databases. Seventeen studies (1,348,690 participants) were included. Seroconversion rates between immune-mediated dermatological disease patients and healthy controls were not different. However, among individuals aged ≤55 years, immune-mediated dermatological disease patients had lower mean anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels. Immunosuppressed immune-mediated dermatological disease patients also had lower titres and were less likely to achieve T-cell response. In terms of safety, the risk of adverse events was higher in atopic dermatitis patients, but those with psoriasis had a reduced risk. Additionally, immunosuppressed patients had fewer adverse events. Vaccinated immune-mediated dermatological disease patients had a lower risk of COVID-19 infection than unvaccinated patients but a higher risk than healthy controls; however, disease exacerbation may be induced. In conclusion, immune-mediated dermatological diseases showed a reduced vaccine response in our meta-analysis, yet vaccination remained effective against COVID-19 infection and well tolerated.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19; Skin Diseases; Immunogenicity, Vaccine; Immunocompromised Host; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccine Efficacy; Middle Aged; Adult
PubMed: 38698654
DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v104.40009 -
Archives of Dermatological Research Apr 2024Patient education in atopic dermatitis (AD) has worked in parallel to the gold standard of pharmacological treatment as a foundational component of therapeutic regimens.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Patient education in atopic dermatitis (AD) has worked in parallel to the gold standard of pharmacological treatment as a foundational component of therapeutic regimens. In addition to improving patient education, past investigations of educational interventions have demonstrated profound reductions in disease severity for patients living with AD. However, prior meta-analytical work has focused mostly on comparing in-person interventions, and thus the need to determine the effectiveness of virtual methodologies in the current post-COVID era remains. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the effectiveness of online programming in AD education compared to in-person interventions. A comprehensive search was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 2019. Studies were retrieved based on articles published up to 04 April 2023. Adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement guided the reportage process for this systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary outcome of our meta-analysis was the effect of various educational modalities on atopic dermatitis severity as measured by multiple scales across the studies, the most common including SCORAD, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI). Most studies were randomized controlled trials, primarily from North America and Western Europe and focused on patient and/or caregiver education about disease management, self-care techniques, avoidance of triggers, and comprehensive understanding of the disease process. Our pooled analyses showed that targeted educational programs in understudied adult populations can be as impactful as those in pediatric groups. Moreover, virtual interventions can be employed as constructive tools for reducing barriers of access to patient education. Future research on educational interventions should utilize various methodologies to encourage individual learning preferences with a focus on adult cohorts.
Topics: Dermatitis, Atopic; Humans; Patient Education as Topic; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; COVID-19
PubMed: 38662127
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-024-02871-y -
Scientific Reports Apr 2024Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is associated with anxiety and depression. Few studies have addressed interventions for symptoms of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is associated with anxiety and depression. Few studies have addressed interventions for symptoms of anxiety and depression in this population. To determine the efficacy of interventions for anxiety and depression in patients with AD. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to November 2023. English-language studies published in peer-reviewed journals evaluating the effect of interventions on anxiety and/or depression using validated assessment tools on patients with AD were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened by at least two independent reviewers. Of 1410 references that resulted in the initial search, 17 studies were included. Fourteen of these studies are randomized controlled trials, while the other 3 studies are prospective controlled trials with pre and post-test designs. Data were extracted using a standardized extraction form, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. To accommodate trials with multiple interventions (each compared to a control group), we conducted a mixed-effects meta-analysis with the trial as a random effect. Prespecified outcomes were changes in symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients with AD as evaluated using standardized assessment tools. Of the 17 studies included in this systematic review, 7 pharmacological intervention studies with 4723 participants examining 5 different medications were included in a meta-analysis. Of these studies, only 1 study evaluated medications prescribed to treat anxiety and/or depression; the rest evaluated medications prescribed to treat AD. Meta-analysis of all the pharmacological interventions resulted in significant improvement in anxiety, depression, and combined anxiety-depression scale scores (standardized mean difference [95% CI]: - 0.29 [- 0.49 to - 0.09], - 0.27 [- 0.45 to - 0.08], - 0.27 [- 0.45 to - 0.08]) respectively. The 10 non-pharmacological studies with 2058 participants showed general improvement in anxiety but not depression. A meta-analysis of the non-pharmacological interventions was not conducted due to variable approaches and limited data. Pharmacological interventions designed to improve AD were found to improve anxiety and depression in patients with moderate-severe disease. More comprehensive studies on non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions that primarily target anxiety and depression are needed.
Topics: Humans; Dermatitis, Atopic; Depression; Prospective Studies; Anxiety; Anxiety Disorders
PubMed: 38632375
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59162-9 -
Biomedical Reports May 2024Abrocitinib is a highly selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor that can block a multitude of inflammatory signaling pathways that underlie atopic dermatitis (AD). In...
Effects of abrocitinib on pruritus and eczema symptoms and tolerance in patients with moderate‑to‑severe atopic dermatitis in randomized, double‑blind and placebo‑controlled trials: A systematic review and a meta‑analysis.
Abrocitinib is a highly selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor that can block a multitude of inflammatory signaling pathways that underlie atopic dermatitis (AD). In addition, abrocitinib inhibits JAK1 signaling in sensory neurons to alleviate acute and chronic pruritus during AD. However, substantial variations in efficacy and safety risks remain due to variations in doses applied in clinical use. Therefore for the present study, differences in the efficacy and tolerability of 100 and 200 mg abrocitinib for treating pruritus and eczema symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe AD were evaluated compared with placebo. Specifically, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of abrocitinib compared with placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD were searched on Pubmed, E.B. Stephens Company, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Medical network, Web of Science and related Clinical Trials Registry up to November 2023. In total, two researchers evaluated the quality of the included literature according to the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews. RevMan 5.3 software was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety indicators in a cross-comparison of the effects exerted by placebo and 100 and 200 mg abrocitinib. A total of 1,825 patients with moderate-to-severe AD were included across five double-blind, placebo RCTs. Compared with the placebo group, during the double-blind trial period, significant improvements were observed in the investigator's global assessment score, response rate of eczema area and severity index (EASI)-50, EASI-75, EASI-90 and pruritus numerical rating scale (P-NRS) in the 100 and 200 mg abrocitinib groups (P<0.05). However, pairwise control analysis of the 100 and 200 mg group yielded significant differences (P<0.05) in all of the aforementioned therapeutic indicators except for the P-NRS score. In terms of safety, compared with the placebo group, there were significantly higher incidence of nausea, upper respiratory tract viral infection, infections and infestations in the 100 mg abrocitinib group (P<0.05). In addition, there were significantly higher incidence of nausea, gastrointestinal disorder, headache and dizziness in the 200 mg group (P<0.05). There were also significant differences in the incidence of nausea, gastrointestinal disorder and dizziness between the 100 and 200 mg groups (P<0.05). For patients with moderate-to-severe AD, oral administration of 100 or 200 mg abrocitinib once/day was concluded to ameliorate skin pruritus and eczema symptoms to varying degrees, with the efficacy significantly superior at the 200 mg dose. However, the risk of a number of adverse reactions, such as headache, dizziness, nausea and gastrointestinal dysfunction, is also significantly increased. Therefore, patients should be made aware of the risk of adverse drug effects prior to the administration of long-term high abrocitinib doses. Furthermore, large-scale, multi-center, rigorous clinical trials remain necessary to validate the findings from the present study.
PubMed: 38628626
DOI: 10.3892/br.2024.1772 -
Dermatology Reports Mar 2024Asian herbal medicines have been known for decades, and some have been used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). This chronic and persistent inflammatory skin condition...
Asian herbal medicines have been known for decades, and some have been used to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). This chronic and persistent inflammatory skin condition causes severe morbidity and negatively impacts the quality of life. In numerous trials, traditional Chinese medicines have demonstrated clinical efficacy for AD. However, there is no well-documented summary of the wide variety of Asian herbal medicines used in treating AD. We aimed to systematically summarize the use of Asian herbal medicine in AD. An English-language literature search was performed in three electronic medical databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCOhost using keywords [("atopic dermatitis" OR "atopic eczema") AND ("traditional" OR "herbal")] and limited to references published between January 2015 and December 2022. The literature included newborns, infants, children, adolescents, and adults. The review was conducted using the extension to determine the main criteria. The content and inclusiveness of the search were filtered using relevant terms (MeSH/Emtree), keywords, titles, and abstracts. Thirteen articles (12 randomized clinical trial + 1 clinical trial) reported a variety of herbal medicine compounds to treat AD with various efficacy. Most studies reported significant improvement when comparing the herbal medicine with a placebo, but only 1 study reported substantial improvement of SCORAD compared to corticosteroids. Asian herbal medicines have been studied and may be used as an alternative treatment in treating AD with fewer adverse effects. However, its role did not change the position of standard treatment in treating atopic dermatitis.
PubMed: 38585491
DOI: 10.4081/dr.2023.9727 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024Growing evidence suggests that headache disorders and atopic dermatitis share similar pathological mechanisms and risk factors. The aim of this study was to assess the...
BACKGROUND
Growing evidence suggests that headache disorders and atopic dermatitis share similar pathological mechanisms and risk factors. The aim of this study was to assess the risk for headache disorders in patients with atopic dermatitis.
METHODS
We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to December 1, 2023, for observational studies that examined risk of migraine in subjects with atopic dermatitis. Risk estimates from individual studies were pooled using random-effects models.
RESULTS
Ten studies with 12,717,747 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. Our results showed that patients with atopic dermatitis were associated with a higher risk of headache disorder (OR, 1.46, 95% CI = 1.36-1.56; < 0.001; I = 98%) or migraine (OR, 1.32, 95% CI = 1.18-1.47; < 0.001; I = 98.9%). Most of the results of the subgroup analyses were consistent with the overall results.
CONCLUSION
The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that atopic dermatitis is a potential risk indicator for headache disorder or migraine. Further studies are still needed to verify our findings due to the substantial heterogeneity in our analyses.
PubMed: 38576533
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1383832