-
The Journal of Innovations in Cardiac... Sep 2022Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use has become increasingly popular. Current guidelines recommend using ARNI therapy for heart failure with reduced... (Review)
Review
Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use has become increasingly popular. Current guidelines recommend using ARNI therapy for heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As therapies become more widely available, heart failure-associated burdens such as ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) will become increasingly prevalent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of ARNI therapy on HFrEF and HFpEF pertaining to arrhythmogenesis and SCD. We performed a search of MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies. The odds ratios (ORs) of SCD, ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks were calculated. A total of 10 studies, including 6 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies, were included in the analysis. A total of 18,548 patients from all studies were included, with 9,328 patients in the ARNI arm and 9,220 patients in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) arm, with a median follow-up time of 15 months. There was a significant reduction in the composite outcomes of SCD and ventricular arrhythmias in patients treated with ARNIs compared to those treated with ACEIs/ARBs (OR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.93; = .01; I = 17%; = .29). ARNI therapy was also associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks. There was no significant reduction in the VT, VF, AF, or SVT incidence rate in the ARNI group compared to the ACEI/ARB group. In conclusion, the use of ARNIs confers a reduction in composite outcomes of SCD and ventricular arrhythmias among patients with heart failure. These outcomes were mainly driven by SCD reduction in patients treated with ARNIs.
PubMed: 36196235
DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2022.130905 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2022An update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of arrhythmias and their subtypes in type 2 diabetic patients receiving glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
An update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of arrhythmias and their subtypes in type 2 diabetic patients receiving glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) medication according to data from the Cardiovascular Outcome Trial(CVOT).
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCT) on GLP-1RA therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients published in full-text journal databases such as MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, Clinical Trials.gov, and the Cochrane Library from establishment to March 1, 2022 were searched. We assessed the quality of individual studies by the Cochrane risk-of-bias algorithm. RevMan 5.4.1 software was use for calculating meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 60,081 randomized participants were included in the data of these 8 GLP-1RA cardiovascular outcomes trials. Pooled analysis reported no significant effect on total arrhythmia [RR=0.96, 95% CI (0.96, 1.05), =0.36], and its subtypes such as atrial fibrillation [RR=0.96, 95% CI (0.86, 1.07), =0.43], atrial flutter [RR= 0.82, 95% CI (0.57, 1.19), =0.30], atrial tachycardia [RR=0.64, 95% CI (0.20, 2.01), =0.44)], sinoatrial node dysfunction [RR=0.74, 95% CI (0.44, 1.25), =0.26], ventricular preterm systole [RR=1.42, 95% CI (0.62, 3.26), =0.41], second degree AV block [RR=0.96, 95% CI (0.53, 1.72), =0.88], complete AV block [RR=0.75, 95% CI (0.49, 1.17), =0.21], ventricular fibrillation [RR=1.00, 95% CI (0.50, 2.02), =1.00], ventricular tachycardia [RR=1.37, 95% CI (0.91, 2.08), =0.13] from treatment with GLP-1RA versus placebo. However, the risk of hypoglycemia was reduced by about 30% [RR=0.70, 95% CI (0.57, 0.87), =0.001] and the risk of pneumonia by about 25% [RR=0.85, 95% CI (0.75, 0.97), =0.01], both statistically significant differences.
CONCLUSION
In type 2 diabetic patients, treatment with GLP-1RA has no significant effect on the risk of major arrhythmias but significantly reduces the risk of hypoglycemia and pneumonia.
Topics: Atrioventricular Block; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infant, Newborn; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36034440
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.910256 -
Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review Apr 2022The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to... (Review)
Review
The advantage of prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation for AF patients without documented atrial flutter is still unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the role of prophylactic CTI ablation in this population. A systematic review and meta-analysis study was conducted. The overall effects estimation was conducted using random effects models. The pooled effects were presented as the risk difference and standardised mean difference for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. A total of 1,476 patients from four studies were included. The risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias following a successful catheter ablation procedure was greater in the pulmonary vein isolation + CTI ablation group than pulmonary vein isolation alone group (34.8% versus 28.2%; risk difference 0.08; 95% CI [0.00-0.17]; p=0.04). Prophylactic CTI ablation was associated with a higher recurrent AF rate (33.8% versus 27.1%; risk difference 0.07; 95% CI [0.01-0.13]; p=0.02). Additional prophylactic CTI ablation to pulmonary vein isolation significantly increased the radio frequency application time (standardised mean difference 0.52; 95% CI [0.04-1.01]; p=0.03). This study suggested that prophylactic CTI ablation was an ineffective and inefficient approach in AF without documented typical atrial flutter patients.
PubMed: 35846424
DOI: 10.15420/aer.2021.37 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022Fetal arrhythmias are common cardiac abnormalities associated with high mortality due to ventricular dysfunction and heart failure, particularly when accompanied by...
Fetal arrhythmias are common cardiac abnormalities associated with high mortality due to ventricular dysfunction and heart failure, particularly when accompanied by hydrops. Although several types of common fetal tachycardias have been relatively identified medications, such as digoxin, flecainide, and sotalol, there is no first-line drug treatment protocol established for the treatment of various types of fetal tachycardias. We conducted a network meta-analysis using a Bayesian hierarchical framework to obtain a model for integrating both direct and indirect evidence. All tachycardia types (Total group), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT subgroup), atrial flutter (AF subgroup), hydrops subgroup, and non-hydrops subgroup fetuses were analyzed, and five first-line regimens were ranked according to treatment outcomes: digoxin monotherapy (D), flecainide monotherapy (F), sotalol monotherapy (S), digoxin plus flecainide combination therapy (DF), and digoxin plus sotalol combination therapy (DS). Effectiveness and safety were determined according to the cardioversion rate and intrauterine death rate. The pooled data indicated that DF combination therapy was always superior to D monotherapy, regardless of the tachycardia type or the presence of hydrops: Total, 2.44 (95% CrI: 1.59, 3.52); SVT, 2.77 (95% CrI: 1.59, 4.07); AF, 67.85 (95% CrI: 14.25, 168.68); hydrops, 6.03 (95% CrI: 2.54, 10.68); and non-hydrops, 5.06 (95% CrI: 1.87, 9.88). DF and F had a similar effect on control of fetal tachycardias. No significant differences were observed when comparing S, DS with D therapies across the subgroup analyses for the SVT, hydrops, and non-hydrops groups. No significant differences in mortality risks were among the various treatment regimens for the total group. And no significant differences were found in rates of intrauterine death rates at the same cardioversion amount. The flecainide monotherapy and combination of digoxin and flecainide should be considered the most superior therapeutic strategies for fetal tachycardia. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=288997), identifier (288997).
PubMed: 35770083
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.935455 -
Journal of Thoracic Disease May 2022Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and heart failure (HF) are closely related to the increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL). However, massive...
The effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitor in the incidence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus/heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and heart failure (HF) are closely related to the increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL). However, massive clinical studies have shown that sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) affects the occurrence of AF/AFL and its complications, but the promoting or inhibitory effect of SGLT2i on AF/AFL and its complications and the exact probability is not clear, meta-analysis can combine the existing research data to easily solve the clinical problems.
METHODS
We performed a search in the registers of ClinicalTrials.gov from it,s inception to March 2021 to evaluate the occurrence of AF/AFL adverse events in SGLT2i in patients with T2D/HF. Almost all of the included studies were double-blind parallel allocation randomized controlled studies, and only one was open. The control groups all included placebo, some of which also included glimepiride, metformin, liraglutide, etc. Quality risk assessment of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using Cochrane RoB 2.0., and the publication bias assessment was conducted using STATA 17.0. The odds ratio (OR) combined effect of 95% confidence interval (CI) was used for bivariate variables.
RESULTS
We included data from 22 confirmed trials that included 52,951 T2D/HF patients. The studies had no risk of bias. Analysis of the cumulative results showed that compared with placebo, SGLT2i can significantly reduce the incidence of AF/AFL by 18% (OR =0.82, 95% CI: 0.73 to 0.93, P=0.002), and reduce the incidence of arrhythmia by 14% (OR =0.86, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.94, P=0.0006); among them, the incidence of AF/AFL in T2D patients was reduced by 20% (OR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.92, P=0.002); Dapagliflozin reduced the incidence of AF/AFL by 15% (OR =0.85, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.98, P=0.03); the incidence of intracardiac thrombosis decreased by 69% (OR =0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.91, P=0.03), while the incidence of AF/AFL in women decreased by 17% (OR =0.83, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.94, P=0.004).
DISCUSSION
This article provides a new direction for the use of SGLT2i, and hopefully it can provide certain theoretical basis for the broader clinical indications of SGLT2i in the future.
PubMed: 35693625
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-550 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Arrhythmic events such as atrial fibrillation (AF) are tightly associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF). Previous studies have shown inconsistent results...
Effect of Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter Protein 2 Inhibitors on Arrhythmia in Heart Failure Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
AIM
Arrhythmic events such as atrial fibrillation (AF) are tightly associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF). Previous studies have shown inconsistent results regarding the association between sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and the risk of arrhythmia. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of SGLT2i treatment with arrhythmia outcomes in clinical trials of patients with HF.
METHODS
We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, The Cochrane Library, and JAMA databases to identify appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SGLT2i interventions. Endpoint outcomes included AF, atrial flutter (AFL), AF/AFL, ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular tachycardia (VT), VF/VT, and bradycardia. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis of all outcomes. The risk of bias and quality of evidence was assessed by using the Cochrane tool and assessment framework.
RESULTS
Out of 1,725 citations, 9 trials were included in this study, with follow-up from 4 weeks to 52 weeks for 10,344 participants (mean age 68.27 years; 69.62% of participants were men). Compared with placebo, SGLT2i reduced the incidence of AF by 37% [ratio risk (RR) 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45-0.87; < 0.05] and AF/AFL by 34% (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.49-0.90; < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
SGLT2i can reduce the risk of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly the AF. Our study provides strong evidence for recommending the use of SGLT2i in patients with HF.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42022296696.
PubMed: 35665272
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.902923 -
Biology Mar 2022Cardiolaminopathies are a heterogeneous group of disorders which are due to mutations in the genes encoding for nuclear lamins or their binding proteins. The whole... (Review)
Review
Cardiolaminopathies are a heterogeneous group of disorders which are due to mutations in the genes encoding for nuclear lamins or their binding proteins. The whole spectrum of cardiac manifestations encompasses atrial arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, progressive systolic dysfunction, and malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Despite the prognostic significance of cardiac involvement in this setting, the current recommendations lack strong evidence. The aim of our work was to systematically review the current data on the main cardiovascular outcomes in cardiolaminopathies. We searched PubMed/Embase for studies focusing on cardiovascular outcomes in mutation carriers (atrial arrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, conduction disturbances, thromboembolic events, systolic dysfunction, heart transplantation, and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality). In total, 11 studies were included (1070 patients, mean age between 26-45 years, with follow-up periods ranging from 2.5 years up to 45 ± 12). When available, data on the -mutated population were separately reported (40 patients). The incidence rates (IR) were individually assessed for the outcomes of interest. The IR for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia ranged between 6.1 and 13.9 events/100 pts-year. The IR of atrial standstill ranged between 0 and 2 events/100 pts-year. The IR for malignant ventricular arrhythmias reached 10.2 events/100 pts-year and 15.6 events/100 pts-year for appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) interventions. The IR for advanced conduction disturbances ranged between 3.2 and 7.7 events/100 pts-year. The IR of thromboembolic events reached up to 8.9 events/100 pts-year. Our results strengthen the need for periodic cardiological evaluation focusing on the early recognition of atrial arrhythmias, and possibly for the choice of preventive strategies for thromboembolic events. The frequent need for cardiac pacing due to advanced conduction disturbances should be counterbalanced with the high risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias that would justify ICD over pacemaker implantation.
PubMed: 35453731
DOI: 10.3390/biology11040530 -
Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine Mar 2022Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), primarily performed in patients who fail antiarrhythmic drugs. Whether early catheter ablation,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Catheter ablation is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), primarily performed in patients who fail antiarrhythmic drugs. Whether early catheter ablation, as first-line therapy, is associated with improved clinical outcomes remains unclear.
METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase) were searched until March 28th, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first-line therapy were included. The primary outcome of interest was the first documented recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (symptomatic or asymptomatic; AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia) and serious adverse events. Unadjusted risk ratios (RR) were calculated from dichotomous data using Mantel Haenszel (M-H) random-effects with statistical significance considered if the confidence interval (CI) excludes one and < 0.05.
RESULTS
A total of six RCTs with 1212 patients (Ablation n = 609; Antiarrhythmic n = 603) were included. Follow- up period ranged from 1-2 years. Patients who underwent ablation were less likely to experience any recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia when compared to patients receiving antiarrhythmic drugs (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.55-0.73; < 0.00001). Symptomatic atrial tachyarrhythmia was also lower in the ablation arm (RR 0.53; 95% CI 0.32-0.87; = 0.01). No statistically significant differences were noted for overall any type of adverse events (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.68-1.27; = 0.64) and cardiovascular adverse events (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44; = 0.65) respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Catheter ablation, as first-line therapy, was associated with a significantly lower rate of tachyarrhythmia recurrence compared to conventional antiarrhythmic drugs, with a similar adverse effect risk profile. These findings support a catheter ablation strategy as first-line therapy among patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Topics: Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Catheter Ablation; Humans; Recurrence; Tachycardia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35345279
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2303112 -
Cardiology Journal 2022Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the adult population. Herein, is a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the impact of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in the adult population. Herein, is a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the impact of AF/atrial flutter (AFL) on mortality, as well as individual complications in patients hospitalized with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
METHODS
A systematic search of the SCOPUS, Medline, Web of Science, CINAHL and Cochrane databases was performed. The a priori primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. A random-effects model was used to pool study results.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies which included 33,296 patients were involved in this meta-analysis. Inhospital mortality for AF/AFL vs. no-AF/AFL groups varied and amounted to 32.8% vs. 14.2%, respectively (risk ratio [RR]: 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.79-2.65; p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality in new onset AF/AFL compared to no-AFAFL was 22.0% vs. 18.8% (RR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.54-2.24; p < 0.001). Intensive care unit (ICU) admission was required for 17.7% of patients with AF/AFL compared to 10.8% for patients without AF/AFL (RR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.04-3.62; p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS
The present study reveals that AF/AFL is associated with increased in-hospital mortality and worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 and may be used as a negative prognostic factor in these patients. Patients with AF/AFL are at higher risk of hospitalization in ICU. The presence of AF/AFL in individuals with COVID-19 is associated with higher risk of complications, such as bleeding, acute kidney injury and heart failure. AF/AFL may be associated with unfavorable outcomes due to the hemodynamic compromise of cardiac function itself or hyperinflammatory state typical of these conditions.
Topics: Adult; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; COVID-19; Hospitalization; Humans; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34897631
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2021.0167 -
The American Journal of Cardiology Dec 2021Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia, and it increases stroke risk. A preventive approach to AF is needed because virtually all...
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common clinically significant arrhythmia, and it increases stroke risk. A preventive approach to AF is needed because virtually all treatments such as cardioversion, antiarrhythmic drugs, ablation, and anticoagulation are associated with high cost and carry significant risk. A systematic review was performed to identify effective lifestyle-based strategies for reducing primary and secondary AF. A PubMed search was performed using articles up to March 1, 2021. Search terms included atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, exercise, diet, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypertension, stress, tobacco smoking, alcohol, Mediterranean diet, sodium, and omega-3 fatty acids. Additional articles were identified from the bibliographies of retrieved articles. The control of hypertension, ideally with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor, is effective for preventing primary AF and recurrence. Obstructive sleep apnea is a common cause of AF, and treating it effectively reduces AF episodes. Alcohol increases the risk of AF in a dose-dependent manner, and abstinence reduces risk of recurrence. Sedentary behavior and chronic high-intensity endurance exercise are both risk factors for AF; however, moderate physical activity is associated with lower risk of AF. Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists have been associated with reduced risk of AF. Among overweight/obese patients, weight loss of ≥10% is associated with reduced AF risk. Lifestyle changes and risk factor modification are highly effective for preventing AF.
Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Atrial Fibrillation; Bariatric Surgery; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet Therapy; Diet, Mediterranean; Dietary Fats, Unsaturated; Endurance Training; Exercise; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity; Overweight; Risk Reduction Behavior; Sedentary Behavior; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Smoking; Smoking Cessation; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Weight Loss
PubMed: 34583808
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.08.042