-
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Mar 2024Tibial spine avulsion fractures (TSAFs) account for approximately 14% of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. This study aims to systematically review the current... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tibial spine avulsion fractures (TSAFs) account for approximately 14% of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. This study aims to systematically review the current evidence for the operative management of paediatric TSAFs.
METHODS
A search was carried out across four databases: MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Studies discussing the outcomes of the surgical management of paediatric TSAFs since 2000 were included.
RESULTS
Of 38 studies included for review, 13 studies reported outcomes of TSAF patients undergoing screw fixation only, and 12 studies used suture fixation only. In total, 976 patients underwent arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF), and 203 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The risk of arthrofibrosis with the use of ARIF ( = 0.45) and screws ( = 0.74) for TSAF repair was not significant. There was a significantly increased risk of knee instability ( < 0.0001), reoperation ( = 0.01), and post-operative pain ( = 0.007) with screw fixation compared to sutures.
CONCLUSIONS
While the overall benefits of sutures over screws and ARIF over ORIF are unclear, there is clear preference for ARIF and suture fixation for TSAF repair in practice. We recommend large-scale comparative studies to delineate long-term outcomes for various TSAF fixation techniques.
PubMed: 38539382
DOI: 10.3390/children11030345 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Sep 2023There is no consensus regarding the management of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures and the expected outcomes after treatment. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
There is no consensus regarding the management of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) avulsion fractures and the expected outcomes after treatment.
PURPOSE
To systematically review clinical outcomes and complications after management of tibial-sided avulsion fractures of the PCL.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
A literature search of Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials was performed in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Included were studies with evidence levels 1 to 4 that reported clinical outcomes after treatment of PCL tibial-sided avulsion fractures in humans. The quality of the included studies was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. A meta-analysis was performed for patient-reported outcome measures using random-effects modeling with 95% CIs.
RESULTS
A total of 58 studies published between 1999 and 2022 were identified. The mean MINORS score was 9.90 ± 4.12, indicating overall low-quality evidence with high risk of bias. The studies comprised 1440 patients (mean age, 32.59 ± 5.69 years; 75.2% males) with a mean follow-up of 26.9 ± 19.6 months (range, 5.3-126 months). Most patients were treated with open surgery (63.6%), followed by arthroscopic surgery (29.7%) and nonoperative treatment (6.7%). All patients reported significant posttreatment improvement in both subjective and objective outcomes ( < .05 for all). Arthroscopic surgery was associated with lower postoperative posterior tibial translation compared with open surgery (range, 0.6-3.2 vs 1.7-3.1 mm), greater preoperative to postoperative improvement in Lysholm score (54.6 vs 48.8; < .0001), higher postoperative Tegner score (6.64 ± 1.03 vs 6.14 ± 2.29; = .0448), and a higher rate of return to sport (100% vs 89.5%; = .009). Nonoperative management was associated with a significantly lower fracture union rate (87% vs 99.1%; < .0001) and greater postoperative side-to-side posterior translation (4.9 ± 4.3 mm) when compared with operative management.
CONCLUSION
Although nonoperative and surgical management of PCL tibial avulsion fractures resulted in high rates of fracture union and improvement in functional outcome scores and a low incidence of complications, nonoperative treatment yielded a high side-to-side posterior displacement (>4 mm) with a lower rate of fracture union compared to surgical treatment.
PubMed: 37724253
DOI: 10.1177/23259671231188383 -
Children (Basel, Switzerland) Aug 2023Tibial eminence fractures (TEF) of Meyers-McKeever type II-III-IV usually require surgical management. No consensus in the literature has been achieved regarding the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Tibial eminence fractures (TEF) of Meyers-McKeever type II-III-IV usually require surgical management. No consensus in the literature has been achieved regarding the best treatment option. The aims of the present systematic review were (1) to analyze the current literature and describe the outcomes of surgical treatment for TEF; and (2) to compare the outcomes of different surgical options using arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) with sutures or screws and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).
METHODS
A search was carried out with Pubmed, Medline, and Cochrane. Key terms were used "tibial" AND "eminence" or "spine" or "intercondylar" AND "paediatric" or "children" AND "fracture" or "avulsion" AND "treatment". Twelve articles met the inclusion criteria. Demographic data, clinical outcomes, and complication rates were evaluated for each study. Means/standard deviation and sum/percentage were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Chi-square or t-student tests were applied. A -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
ORIF showed superior clinical outcomes (Tegner ( < 0.05) and Lysholm ( < 0.001) scores) relative to ARIF and a lower incidence of arthrofibrosis ( < 0.05) and implant removal ( < 0.01). The Tegner, IKDC, and Lysholm scores showed statistically significant superior results following arthroscopic sutures compared to arthroscopic screws ( < 0.001). The incidence of arthrofibrosis was higher after arthroscopic sutures ( < 0.05), the implant removal was higher after screw fixation ( < 0.001) Conclusions: Better clinical results with low complication rates were achieved with ORIF surgery rather than ARIF; arthroscopic suture fixation resulted in higher clinical results compared to arthroscopic screw fixation and reduced the incidence of postoperative complications.
PubMed: 37628378
DOI: 10.3390/children10081379 -
Evidence-based Dentistry Sep 2023Systematic review.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
REVIEW QUESTION
Does splinting of traumatised primary teeth improve clinical outcomes?
CASE SELECTION
Clinical studies published after 2003 reporting trauma (luxation, root fracture or alveolar fracture) to primary teeth, with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, were eligible for inclusion. Case reports were excluded, but case series were included. Studies reporting the outcome of splinting following avulsion injuries were excluded, as current guidance does not recommend re-implantation of teeth for these injuries.
DATA ANALYSIS
Two researchers independently assessed the risk of bias in the included studies, with a third researcher resolving any disagreements. The same two independent researchers conducted a quality assessment of the included studies.
RESULTS
Three retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one of these studies had a control group. High success rates were reported for the management of teeth with root fractures. A benefit for splinting teeth with lateral luxation was not identified. No alveolar fractures were included.
CONCLUSIONS
This review suggests that the outcome of the management of root fractures in primary teeth may benefit from flexible splinting. However, the evidence base is low.
Topics: Humans; Splints; Retrospective Studies; Tooth Root; Incisor; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 37433924
DOI: 10.1038/s41432-023-00914-3 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2022Avulsion fractures of the pelvis and hip region are typical injuries in adolescent athletes. Avulsion sites include the muscle tendon origin or insertion, and treating...
Avulsion fractures of the pelvis and hip region are typical injuries in adolescent athletes. Avulsion sites include the muscle tendon origin or insertion, and treating these injuries surgically or conservatively remains a debated issue. The main goals of this review were to assess and summarize injury types and sites, treatment-related clinical outcomes, and return to sport for adolescent patients with a pelvis avulsion fracture and to provide support for making treatment decisions. The PubMed database was searched in November 2021 to identify all published articles from 2000 to 2021 that reported the outcome and return to sport after conservative or surgical treatment. Eighteen studies with 453 patients were included in this review. The age range was 13.6-16.8 years. The most common injury site the was anterior superior iliac spine (37%), followed by the anterior inferior iliac spine (31%), ischial tuberosity (14%), lesser trochanter (9%), iliac crest (8%), and superior corner of the pubic symphysis (1%). Overall complications were lower in the surgical group compared to the conservative group. The rate of return to pre-injury activity level was greater in patients who underwent surgical treatment ( < 0.05). In conclusion, surgery is preferred for major dislocation and fragment size, providing a better return-to-sport rate and decreasing the risk of complications.
PubMed: 36210934
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.947463 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine May 2022Arm wrestling is a popular sport in which various injuries have occurred, even in children. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Arm wrestling is a popular sport in which various injuries have occurred, even in children.
PURPOSE
To analyze reported fracture-separation of the medial humeral epicondyle (MHE) caused by arm wrestling to determine its mechanism and provide a current overview.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS
The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched using the terms "arm wrestling" and "humeral fracture" or "medial humeral epicondyle fracture"; and "sports" and "humeral fracture" or "medial humeral epicondyle fracture," following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The inclusion criteria were English full-text articles on arm wrestling-induced MHE fracture that described patient characteristics and presented appropriate images. Studies with a lack of appropriate images or detailed description of the injury situation were excluded. The patient characteristics were evaluated, and the ratios of treatment selection and outcomes were evaluated using the chi-square test.
RESULTS
Included were 27 studies with a total of 68 patients, all boys with a mean age of 14.6 ± 1.24 years (based on n = 65, with 3 patients excluded from this calculation as no definitive age was provided). Boys aged 14 to 15 years accounted for 72% (49/68) of the cases. Fracture occurred suddenly during arm wrestling in 63 boys, while the other 5 boys experienced antecedent medial elbow pain. The match status at the time of injury, provided for 46 patients, was varied. In 31 boys with known match details, injury occurred when a participant suddenly added more force to change the match status. Eight patients displayed anterior and/or proximal displacement of the MHE fragment. Treatment was nonoperative in 25 patients and operative in 38 patients (n = 63, excluding 5 unknown patients). In 35 patients followed up for ≥3 months (mean, 17.6 ± 12.3 months), outcomes were not significantly different between the operative and nonoperative groups.
CONCLUSION
MHE fracture-separation caused by arm wrestling occurred mostly in boys aged 14 to 15 years regardless of the match status. The likely direct cause is forceful traction of the attached flexor-pronator muscles. A relative mechanical imbalance during adolescence may be an underlying cause. A sudden change from concentric to eccentric contraction of the flexor-pronator muscles increases the likelihood of fracture occurrence.
PubMed: 35528993
DOI: 10.1177/23259671221087606 -
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Apr 2022Although arthroscopic screw fixation and suture fixation are mainstream interventions for displaced anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of the tibia, the... (Review)
Review
Functional Outcomes and Subsequent Surgical Procedures After Arthroscopic Suture Versus Screw Fixation for ACL Tibial Avulsion Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Although arthroscopic screw fixation and suture fixation are mainstream interventions for displaced anterior cruciate ligament avulsion fractures of the tibia, the differences in clinical outcomes between them remain inconclusive.
PURPOSE
To conduct a meta-analysis comparing the clinical and functional outcomes between arthroscopic screw fixation and suture fixation for tibial avulsion fractures.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Inclusion criteria were English-language articles that compared functional outcomes after screw fixation versus suture fixation for tibial avulsion fractures and had at least 1-year follow-up. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed statistically using the Mantel-Haenszel method and variance-weighted means. Random-effects models were used to generate pooled relative risk (RR) estimates with confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Of 1395 articles initially identified, we included 5 studies with 184 patients (91 patients with screw fixations and 93 patients with suture fixations). The pooled results indicated similar postoperative outcomes for screw fixation and suture fixation: Lysholm score (mean difference [MD], -0.32 [95% CI, -6.08 to 5.44]; = .91), proportion of International Knee Documentation Committee score grade A (74% vs 74%; RR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.10-3.95]; = .63), Tegner score (MD, 0.10 [95% CI: -1.73 to 1.92]; = .92), and Lachman test results (stable knee joint, 82% vs 82%; RR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.85-1.16; = .90). Patients in the screw fixation group had a significantly higher overall subsequent surgery rate (46% vs 19%; RR, 2.33; 95% CI,1.51-3.60; = .0001) and implant removal rate (44% vs 3%; RR, 8.52; 95% CI, 3.58-20.29; < .00001) compared with those in the suture fixation group. Nonimplant-related subsequent surgery rates were similar for the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION
The findings indicated a higher risk of subsequent surgery (RR, 2.33) and implant removal (RR, 8.52) after screw fixation when compared with suture fixation for tibial avulsion fractures. However, there were no significant differences in clinical outcome scores between the 2 techniques.
PubMed: 35400137
DOI: 10.1177/23259671221085945 -
JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques May 2022The terrible triad of the elbow (TTE) is a complex injury consisting of simultaneous elbow dislocation or subluxation, radial head fracture, and coronoid fracture.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The terrible triad of the elbow (TTE) is a complex injury consisting of simultaneous elbow dislocation or subluxation, radial head fracture, and coronoid fracture. During the initial assessment of a TTE, the typical severity of presenting pain, swelling, and limited range of motion may limit the ability to perform a thorough physical examination and thus divert a clinician's attention away from additional injuries to the ipsilateral upper extremity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to review the literature for reported cases of concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity injuries associated with a TTE and discuss various strategies to increase clinician awareness to avoid underdiagnosis and missed diagnoses.
METHODS
A systematic review of five databases in four languages (English, Spanish, French, and Portuguese), from inception to May 2021, was conducted. Articles describing a TTE with a concomitant osseous, chondral, ligamentous, or musculotendinous injury occurring on the ipsilateral upper extremity were included. The patients were divided into two groups, those presenting with a classic TTE and concomitant ipsilateral upper extremity injury (group 1) and those in whom a TTE variant was described (group 2). A TTE variant was defined as a combination of osseous and/or chondral injuries to the elbow other than the classic description of TTE, in which at least two of the three classical elements of a TTE (elbow dislocation, coronoid fracture, and radial head fracture) were present in addition to other unique elbow osteoarticular injury.
RESULTS
Nineteen articles met inclusion criteria and were further analyzed. A total of 27 patients were analyzed, 23 from group 1 and 4 from group 2. Overall, 33 concomitant injuries were documented in group 1, the most common being an olecranon fracture (27.3%), followed by Essex-Lopresti injury, triceps tendon avulsion, and carpal fracture-dislocation with 4 (12.1%) cases each. Group 2 had four patients, all of whom presented with a unique variant of the classically described TTE.
CONCLUSION
Despite a characteristic radiographic appearance of the classic TTE, additional injuries of the ipsilateral extremity or variants of the classic TTE may be easily missed, especially in cases resulting from high-energy mechanisms of injury. By analyzing the available data on associated injuries and variants that may occur with a TTE, we hope to increase awareness so that clinicians may recognize these less common but more complex injury patterns.
PubMed: 37587951
DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.10.004 -
JSES International Jul 2021Lesser tuberosity fractures are relatively rare, with an incidence of 0.46 per 100,000 persons per year. This systematic review was performed to address patient-reported... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lesser tuberosity fractures are relatively rare, with an incidence of 0.46 per 100,000 persons per year. This systematic review was performed to address patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), shoulder function, and complications after lesser tuberosity fractures in pediatric and adult patients, as well as patients with an associated posterior shoulder dislocation. Within these groups, identical outcomes were evaluated for nonoperative, surgical, acute and delayed treatment.
METHOD
A comprehensive search was carried out in multiple databases. Articles were included if patients sustained a lesser tuberosity fracture without a concomitant proximal humerus fracture. There were no restrictions on age, type of treatment, fragment displacement, time to presentation, or associated injuries.
RESULTS
One thousand six hundred forty-four records were screened for eligibility of which 71 studies were included (n = 172). Surgical treatment was provided to 50 of 62 (81%) pediatric patients, 49 of 66 (74%) adults, and 34 of 44 (77%) patients with an associated posterior shoulder dislocation. In the pediatric group, the mean of PROMs was 94 (range 70-100) and among adults 89 (range 85-100). In the posterior shoulder dislocation group, 89% did not regain full range of motion and the complication rate was 17%. In pediatric patients, surgery was associated with fewer complications ( = .021) compared to nonoperative treatment.
CONCLUSION
Pediatric patients have excellent outcomes after lesser tuberosity fractures and respond well to surgical treatment. Adults have acceptable outcomes but patients with an associated posterior shoulder dislocation have impaired range of shoulder movement and are more likely to develop complications.
PubMed: 34223426
DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.02.016 -
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics Jun 2021Biodegradable implants are of major interest in orthopaedics, especially in the skeletally immature population. Magnesium (Mg) implants are promising for selected...
PURPOSE
Biodegradable implants are of major interest in orthopaedics, especially in the skeletally immature population. Magnesium (Mg) implants are promising for selected surgical procedure in adults, but evidence is lacking. Thus, the aim of this study is to analyze the safety and efficacy of resorbable Mg screw in different orthopaedic procedures in skeletally immature patients. In addition, we present a systematic review of the current literature on the clinical use of Mg implants.
METHODS
From 2018 until the writing of this manuscript, consecutive orthopaedic surgical procedures involving the use of Mg screws performed at our centre in patients < 15 years of age were retrospectively reviewed. In addition, a systematic review of the literature was performed in the main databases. We included clinical studies conducted on humans, using Mg-alloy implants for orthopaedic procedures.
RESULTS
A total of 14 patients were included in this retrospective analysis. Mean age at surgery was 10.8 years (sd 2.4), mean follow-up was 13.8 months (sd 7.5). Healing was achieved in all the procedures, with no implant-related adverse reaction. No patients required any second surgical procedure. The systematic review evidenced 20 clinical studies, 19 of which conducted on an adult and one including paediatric patients.
CONCLUSION
Evidence on resorbable Mg implants is low but promising in adults and nearly absent in children. Our series included apophyseal avulsion, epiphyseal fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, displaced osteochondral fragment and tendon-to-bone fixation. Mg screws guaranteed stable fixation, without implant failure, with good clinical and radiological results and no adverse events.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
IV - Single cohort retrospective analysis with systematic review.
PubMed: 34211595
DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210004