-
Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver... Sep 2018Symptomatic Uncomplicated Diverticular disease (SUDD) affects about 25% of patients harboring colonic diverticula. We assessed the effectiveness of mesalazine in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Mesalazine to treat symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease and to prevent acute diverticulitis occurrence. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Symptomatic Uncomplicated Diverticular disease (SUDD) affects about 25% of patients harboring colonic diverticula. We assessed the effectiveness of mesalazine in improving symptoms (namely abdominal pain, primary outcome) and in preventing diverticulitis occurrence (secondary outcome) in patients with SUDD.
METHODS
Pertinent studies were selected from the Medline and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status), which compared mesalazine, irrespective of the dosage assumption, with placebo in SUDD were evaluated.
RESULTS
Four RCTs enrolled 379 patients, 197 treated with mesalazine and 182 with placebo. Two studies provided data on symptom relief according to definition: it was achieved in 97/121 (80%) patients in the mesalazine group and in 81/129 (62.7%) patients in the placebo group (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.24-0.75; p=0.003 in favour of the mesalazine group). Two studies provided information regarding occurrence of diverticulitis during follow-up. It occurred in 23/119 (19.3%) patients in the mesalazine group and in 34/102 (33.3%) patients in the placebo group (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.17-0.70; p=0.003 in favour of the mesalazine group).
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with mesalazine seems to be effective in achieving symptom relief and in the primary prevention of diverticulitis in patients with SUDD.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Diverticulitis, Colonic; Diverticulum, Colon; Female; Gastrointestinal Agents; Humans; Male; Mesalamine; Middle Aged; Primary Prevention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 30240473
DOI: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.273.pic -
Medicine Aug 2018The contemporary demographics and prevalence of Meckel's diverticulum, clinical presentation and management is not well described. Thus, this article aims to review the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The contemporary demographics and prevalence of Meckel's diverticulum, clinical presentation and management is not well described. Thus, this article aims to review the recent literature concerning Meckel's diverticulum.
METHODS
A systematic PubMed/Medline database search using the terms "Meckel" and "Meckel's" combined with "diverticulum." English language articles published from January 1, 2000 to July 31, 2017 were considered. Studies reporting on the epidemiology of Meckel's diverticulum were included.
RESULTS
Of 857 articles meeting the initial search criteria, 92 articles were selected. Only 4 studies were prospective. The prevalence is reported between 0.3% and 2.9% in the general population. Meckels' diverticulum is located 7 to 200 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve (mean 52.4 cm), it is 0.4 to 11.0 cm long (mean 3.05 cm), 0.3 to 7.0 cm in diameter (mean 1.58 cm), and presents with symptoms in 4% to 9% of patients. The male-to-female (M:F 1.5-4:1) gender distribution is reported up to 4 times more frequent in men. Symptomatic patients are usually young. Of the pediatric symptomatic patients, 46.7% have obstruction, 25.3% have hemorrhage, and 19.5% have inflammation as presenting symptom. Corresponding values for adults are 35.6%, 27.3%, and 29.4%. Ectopic gastric tissue is present in 24.2% to 71.0% of symptomatic Meckel's diverticulum, is associated with hemorrhage and is the most common form of ectopic tissue, followed by ectopic pancreatic tissue present in 0% to 12.0%.
CONCLUSION
The epidemiological patterns and clinical presentation appears stable in the 21st century. A symptomatic Meckel's diverticulum is managed by resection. The issue of prophylactic in incidental Meckel's diverticulum resection remains controversial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Choristoma; Disease Management; Female; Humans; Ileocecal Valve; Male; Meckel Diverticulum; Middle Aged; Pancreas; Prevalence; Sex Distribution; Stomach; Young Adult
PubMed: 30170459
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012154 -
United European Gastroenterology Journal Jun 2018Meckel's diverticulum is present in about 2% of the population. The literature reports 3.2% incidence of tumors within Meckel's diverticulum; the tumors are...
BACKGROUND
Meckel's diverticulum is present in about 2% of the population. The literature reports 3.2% incidence of tumors within Meckel's diverticulum; the tumors are predominantly benign.
OBJECTIVE AND METHODS
The purpose of this study was to evaluate malignant tumors in Meckel's diverticulum through systematic review of the literature and review of electronic medical records including pathology reports over 14 years at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
RESULTS
A literature review over the last 10 years identified 37 citations with 402 patients (median age: 58 years; 68.9% males). The predominant malignancy reported was neuroendocrine tumor 84.6%, followed by gastrointestinal stromal tumor 8.2%, and adenocarcinoma 6%. At the time of diagnosis, 29.5% of patients had metastases. In the Mayo Clinic electronic medical records review, there were 19 patients (5.1% of them surgically removed Meckel's diverticulum) who had a malignancy associated with Meckel's diverticulum: 63.2% neuroendocrine tumor, 10.5% gastrointestinal stromal tumor, 5.3% adenocarcinoma, 5.3% pancreatic epithelial neoplasia, and 15.8% metastases from secondary location. Median size of the malignancy was 7 mm, and 17/19 malignancies were coincidental findings. Most neuroendocrine tumors infiltrated the submucosa, while gastrointestinal stromal tumor and adenocarcinoma invaded the serosa. At the time of diagnosis, 33.3% of patients had metastases.
CONCLUSION
About 5% of Meckel's diverticulums resected were associated with malignant tumors, most commonly neuroendocrine tumor, and a significant portion of Meckel's diverticulum malignancy was metastatic at the time of discovery.
PubMed: 30083336
DOI: 10.1177/2050640617752771 -
Annals of Medicine and Surgery (2012) Mar 2018Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare although serious complication of cholelithiasis resulting in large bowel obstruction. The condition accounts for 4% of all gallstone... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Gallstone sigmoid ileus is a rare although serious complication of cholelithiasis resulting in large bowel obstruction. The condition accounts for 4% of all gallstone ileus patients. There are no recognized management guidelines currently. Management strategies range from minimally invasive endoscopy and lithotripsy to substantial surgery. We aim to identify trends when managing patients with gallstone sigmoid ileus to help improve outcomes.
METHODS
Literature searches of EMBASE, Medline and by hand were conducted. All English language papers published from 2000 to 2017(Oct) were included. The terms 'gallstone', 'sigmoid', 'colon', 'ileus', 'coleus' and 'large bowel obstruction' were used.
RESULTS
38 papers included, male:female ratio was 8:30. Average age was 81.11 (SD ± 7.59). Average length of preceding symptoms was 5.31days (+/-SD3.16). 20/38 (59%) had diverticulosis. 89% of patients had significant comorbidities documented. 34/38 patients underwent computerized tomography. 31 stones were located within sigmoid colon, 4 at rectosigmoid junction and 2 within descending colon. Average impacted gallstone size was 4.14 cm (2.3-7 cm range). 23/38 (61%) patients' initial management was conservative or with endoscopy ± lithotripsy. Conservative management successfully treated 26% of patients. 28/38 (74%) patients ultimately underwent surgical intervention. 5/38 patients died post-operatively. Patients treated non-operatively had shorter hospital stays (4:12.3days) although not significant (p-value = 0.0056).
CONCLUSIONS
There is no management consensus from the literature. Current evidence highlights endoscopy and lithotripsy as practical firstline strategies. However, surgical intervention should not be delayed if non-operative measures fail or in emergency. Given the complexity of such patients, less invasive timesaving surgery appears practical, avoiding bowel resection and associated complications.
PubMed: 29511540
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2018.01.004 -
Nutrients Jan 2018In practice, nutrition recommendations vary widely for inpatient and discharge management of acute, uncomplicated diverticulitis. This systematic review aims to review... (Review)
Review
In practice, nutrition recommendations vary widely for inpatient and discharge management of acute, uncomplicated diverticulitis. This systematic review aims to review the evidence and develop recommendations for dietary fibre modifications, either alone or alongside probiotics or antibiotics, versus any comparator in adults in any setting with or recently recovered from acute, uncomplicated diverticulitis. Intervention and observational studies in any language were located using four databases until March 2017. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and GRADE were used to evaluate the overall quality of the evidence and to develop recommendations. Eight studies were included. There was "very low" quality evidence for comparing a liberalised and restricted fibre diet for inpatient management to improve hospital length of stay, recovery, gastrointestinal symptoms and reoccurrence. There was "very low" quality of evidence for using a high dietary fibre diet as opposed to a standard or low dietary fibre diet following resolution of an acute episode, to improve reoccurrence and gastrointestinal symptoms. The results of this systematic review and GRADE assessment conditionally recommend the use of liberalised diets as opposed to dietary restrictions for adults with acute, uncomplicated diverticulitis. It also strongly recommends a high dietary fibre diet aligning with dietary guidelines, with or without dietary fibre supplementation, after the acute episode has resolved.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Diet; Dietary Fiber; Diverticulitis; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic; Probiotics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Factors
PubMed: 29382074
DOI: 10.3390/nu10020137 -
Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 2018The possible relationship between smoking and risk of colonic diverticulosis has been suggested by recent epidemiological studies, although the results were... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
The possible relationship between smoking and risk of colonic diverticulosis has been suggested by recent epidemiological studies, although the results were inconsistent. This meta-analysis was conducted to summarize all available data.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through May 2017 to identify all studies that compared the risk of colonic diverticulosis among current and former smokers versus nonsmokers. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined together using the random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.
RESULTS
Of 465 potentially eligible articles, three prospective cohort studies with 130,520 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of colonic diverticulosis in current smokers was significantly higher than nonsmokers with the pooled risks ratio of 1.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.89). However, the risk of colonic diverticulosis in former smokers was not significantly higher than nonsmokers with the pooled risk ratio of 1.13 (95% CI, 0.88-1.44).
CONCLUSIONS
A significantly increased risk of colonic diverticulosis among current smokers is demonstrated in this study.
Topics: Diverticulosis, Colonic; Humans; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Smoking
PubMed: 29067919
DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_319_17 -
Hawai'i Journal of Medicine & Public... Aug 2017There have been conflicting reports on the association of alcohol use and diverticular disease. We aimed to determine the odds of developing diverticular disease and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
There have been conflicting reports on the association of alcohol use and diverticular disease. We aimed to determine the odds of developing diverticular disease and diverticular bleeding in patients who consumed alcohol on a regular basis compared with those who did not. MEDLINE and PUBMED were searched up until February 2017 on observational trials, which investigated the effect of alcohol use on two outcomes of diverticular disease: diverticulosis and diverticular bleeding. Quantitative estimates (odds ratios [OR] and confidence intervals [CI]) from included studies were pooled by using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed by the I statistic. In 6 studies including 53,644 subjects and 6 studies including 3,404 subjects, alcohol consumption on a regular basis was not associated with either diverticulosis (OR=1.99; 95% CI 0.99-4.03, I=99%) or diverticular bleeding (OR=1.39; 95% CI 0.84-2.32, I=45%) compared to subjects who did not consume alcohol on a regular basis, respectively. Increased odds of diverticulosis or diverticular bleeding among individuals who consume alcohol on a regular basis were not observed in these meta-analyses.
Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Diverticulum; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Humans; Risk Factors
PubMed: 28808610
DOI: No ID Found -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Jul 2017This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify whether tobacco smoking is associated with an increased risk of diverticular disease. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to clarify whether tobacco smoking is associated with an increased risk of diverticular disease.
METHOD
The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies of smoking and diverticular disease up to 19 February 2016. Prospective studies that reported adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of diverticular disease associated with current or previous smoking were included. Summary RRs were estimated using a random effects model.
RESULTS
We identified five prospective studies which comprised 6076 cases of incident diverticular disease (diverticulosis and diverticulitis) among 385 291 participants and three studies with 1118 cases of complications related to diverticular disease (abscess or perforation) among 292 965. The summary RR for incident diverticular disease was 1.36 (95% CI 1.15-1.61, I = 84%, n = 4) for current smokers, 1.17 (95% CI 1.05-1.31, I = 49%, n = 4) for former smokers and 1.29 (95% CI 1.16-1.44, I = 62%, n = 5) for ever smokers. The summary RR was 1.11 (95% CI 0.99-1.25, I = 82%, n = 4) per 10 cigarettes per day. Although there was some indication of nonlinearity there was a dose-dependent positive association with increasing number of cigarettes smoked per day. There was some evidence that smoking also increases the risk of complications of diverticular disease, but the number of studies was small.
CONCLUSION
The current meta-analysis provides evidence that tobacco smoking is associated with an increased incidence of diverticular disease and related complications.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diverticular Diseases; Diverticulitis; Diverticulum; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Tobacco Smoking
PubMed: 28556447
DOI: 10.1111/codi.13748 -
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Jan 2017Mitochondrial disorders (MIDs) due to respiratory-chain defects or nonrespiratory chain defects are usually multisystem conditions [mitochondrial multiorgan disorder... (Review)
Review
Mitochondrial disorders (MIDs) due to respiratory-chain defects or nonrespiratory chain defects are usually multisystem conditions [mitochondrial multiorgan disorder syndrome (MIMODS)] affecting the central nervous system (CNS), peripheral nervous system, eyes, ears, endocrine organs, heart, kidneys, bone marrow, lungs, arteries, and also the intestinal tract. Frequent gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations of MIDs include poor appetite, gastroesophageal sphincter dysfunction, constipation, dysphagia, vomiting, gastroparesis, GI pseudo-obstruction, diarrhea, or pancreatitis and hepatopathy. Rare GI manifestations of MIDs include dry mouth, paradontosis, tracheoesophageal fistula, stenosis of the duodeno-jejunal junction, atresia or imperforate anus, liver cysts, pancreas lipomatosis, pancreatic cysts, congenital stenosis or obstruction of the GI tract, recurrent bowel perforations with intra-abdominal abscesses, postprandial abdominal pain, diverticulosis, or pneumatosis coli. Diagnosing GI involvement in MIDs is not at variance from diagnosing GI disorders due to other causes. Treatment of mitochondrial GI disease includes noninvasive or invasive measures. Therapy is usually symptomatic. Only for myo-neuro-gastro-intestinal encephalopathy is a causal therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation available. It is concluded that GI manifestations of MIDs are more widespread than so far anticipated and that they must be recognized as early as possible to initiate appropriate diagnostic work-up and avoid any mitochondrion-toxic treatment.
PubMed: 28286566
DOI: 10.1177/1756283X16666806 -
Nutrients Feb 2017Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a syndrome characterized by recurrent abdominal symptoms in patients with colonic diverticula. There is some... (Review)
Review
Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a syndrome characterized by recurrent abdominal symptoms in patients with colonic diverticula. There is some evidence that a high-fiber diet or supplemental fibers may reduce symptoms in SUDD patients and a high-fiber diet is commonly suggested for these patients. This systematic review aims to update the evidence on the efficacy of fiber treatment in SUDD, in terms of a reduction in symptoms and the prevention of acute diverticulitis. According to PRISMA, we identified studies on SUDD patients treated with fibers (PubMed and Scopus). The quality of these studies was evaluated by the Jadad scale. The main outcome measures were a reduction of abdominal symptoms and the prevention of acute diverticulitis. Nineteen studies were included, nine with dietary fiber and 10 with supplemental fiber, with a high heterogeneity concerning the quantity and quality of fibers employed. Single studies suggest that fibers, both dietary and supplemental, could be beneficial in SUDD, even if the quality is very low, with just one study yielding an optimal score. The presence of substantial methodological limitations, the heterogeneity of the therapeutic regimens employed, and the lack of ad hoc designed studies, did not permit a summary of the outcome measure. Thus, the benefit of dietary or supplemental fiber in SUDD patients still needs to be established.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Dietary Fiber; Diverticulosis, Colonic; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28230737
DOI: 10.3390/nu9020161