-
Neuro-oncology Practice Apr 2023Better overall survival (OS) reported in patients with incidental diffuse low-grade glioma (iLGG) in comparison to symptomatic LGG (sLGG) may be overestimated by... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Better overall survival (OS) reported in patients with incidental diffuse low-grade glioma (iLGG) in comparison to symptomatic LGG (sLGG) may be overestimated by lead-time and length-time.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on adult hemispheric iLGGs according to the PRISMA statement to adjust for biases in their outcomes. Survival data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves. Lead-time was estimated by 2 methods: Pooled data of time to become symptomatic (LTs) and time calculated from the tumor growth model (LTg).
RESULTS
We selected articles from PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Scopus since 2000. Five compared OS between patients with iLGG ( = 287) and sLGG ( = 3117). The pooled hazard ratio (pHR) for OS of iLGG to sLGG was 0.40 (95% confidence interval [CI] {0.27-0.61}). The estimated mean LTs and LTg were 3.76 years ( = 50) and 4.16-6.12 years, respectively. The corrected pHRs were 0.64 (95% CI [0.51-0.81]) by LTs and 0.70 (95% CI [0.56-0.88]) by LTg. In patients with total removal, the advantage of OS in iLGG was lost after the correction of lead-time. Patients with iLGG were more likely to be female pooled odds ratio (pOR) 1.60 (95% CI [1.25-2.04]) and have oligodendrogliomas (pOR 1.59 [95% CI {1.05-2.39}]). Correction of the length-time bias, which increased the pHR by 0.01 to 0.03, preserved the statistically significant difference in OS.
CONCLUSIONS
The reported outcome in iLGG was biased by lead-time and length-time. Although iLGG had a longer OS after correction of biases, the difference was less than previously reported.
PubMed: 36970177
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npac073 -
Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.) Mar 2023Glioblastoma is the most common primary neoplasm of the central nervous system. Standard treatment includes surgery with maximum safe resection and radiotherapy plus...
BACKGROUND
Glioblastoma is the most common primary neoplasm of the central nervous system. Standard treatment includes surgery with maximum safe resection and radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy; however, almost invariably, tumor relapse occurs. We aimed to describe signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms present in tumor relapse of glioblastoma.
METHODS
This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. We included studies that enrolled patients 15 years or older with a diagnosis of glioblastoma according to Louis criteria and focused on signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms present in tumor relapse of glioblastoma. The outcome of interest was progression-free survival.
RESULTS
We identified 1470 articles; 31 met the inclusion criteria. From each publication, we obtained the associated markers O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase, isocitrate dehydrogenase, mRNA, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), p53, and others. All publications were evaluated with the Q-Genie checklist tool for quality assessment.
CONCLUSIONS
We identified a wide variety of signaling pathways and molecular processes that are involved in glioblastoma relapse. This diversity would explain intra- and intertumor heterogeneity, treatment evasion, and relapse. However, only a few molecular processes have robust evidence for clinical utility.
Topics: Humans; Glioblastoma; Brain Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Recurrence; Signal Transduction
PubMed: 36961958
DOI: 10.46883/2023.25920986 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Apr 2023The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The extent of resection (EOR) is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in adult patients with Glioma Grade 4 (GG4). The aim of the neuro-oncology section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery (SINch®) was to provide a general overview of the current trends and technical tools to reach this goal.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed. The results were divided and ordered, by an expert team of surgeons, to assess the Class of Evidence (CE) and Strength of Recommendation (SR) of perioperative drugs management, imaging, surgery, intraoperative imaging, estimation of EOR, surgery at tumor progression and surgery in elderly patients.
RESULTS
A total of 352 studies were identified, including 299 retrospective studies and 53 reviews/meta-analysis. The use of Dexamethasone and the avoidance of prophylaxis with anti-seizure medications reached a CE I and SR A. A preoperative imaging standard protocol was defined with CE II and SR B and usefulness of an early postoperative MRI, with CE II and SR B. The EOR was defined the strongest independent risk factor for both OS and tumor recurrence with CE II and SR B. For intraoperative imaging only the use of 5-ALA reached a CE II and SR B. The estimation of EOR was established to be fundamental in planning postoperative adjuvant treatments with CE II and SR B and the stereotactic image-guided brain biopsy to be the procedure of choice when an extensive surgical resection is not feasible (CE II and SR B).
CONCLUSIONS
A growing number of evidences evidence support the role of maximal safe resection as primary OS predictor in GG4 patients. The ongoing development of intraoperative techniques for a precise real-time identification of peritumoral functional pathways enables surgeons to maximize EOR minimizing the post-operative morbidity.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Humans; Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neurosurgery; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36961622
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04274-x -
Neurosurgery Aug 2023Awake craniotomy (AC) is a common neurosurgical procedure for the resection of lesions in eloquent brain areas, which has the advantage of avoiding general anesthesia to...
BACKGROUND
Awake craniotomy (AC) is a common neurosurgical procedure for the resection of lesions in eloquent brain areas, which has the advantage of avoiding general anesthesia to reduce associated complications and costs. A significant resource limitation in low- and middle-income countries constrains the usage of AC.
OBJECTIVE
To review the published literature on AC in African countries, identify challenges, and propose pragmatic solutions by practicing neurosurgeons in Africa.
METHODS
We conducted a scoping review under Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Scoping Review guidelines across 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). English articles investigating AC in Africa were included.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies consisting of 396 patients were included. Egypt was the most represented country with 8 studies (42.1%), followed by Nigeria with 6 records (31.6%). Glioma was the most common lesion type, corresponding to 120 of 396 patients (30.3%), followed by epilepsy in 71 patients (17.9%). Awake-awake-awake was the most common protocol used in 7 studies (36.8%). Sixteen studies (84.2%) contained adult patients. The youngest reported AC patient was 11 years old, whereas the oldest one was 92. Nine studies (47.4%) reported infrastructure limitations for performing AC, including the lack of funding, intraoperative monitoring equipment, imaging, medications, and limited human resources.
CONCLUSION
Despite many constraints, AC is being safely performed in low-resource settings. International collaborations among centers are a move forward, but adequate resources and management are essential to make AC an accessible procedure in many more African neurosurgical centers.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Africa; Brain Neoplasms; Craniotomy; Glioma; Wakefulness; Aged, 80 and over
PubMed: 36961213
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002453 -
Scientific Reports Mar 2023Glioblastomas presenting topographically at the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) are exceedingly rare. Given the specific anatomical considerations and their rarity, overall...
Glioblastomas presenting topographically at the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) are exceedingly rare. Given the specific anatomical considerations and their rarity, overall survival (OS) and management are not discussed in detail. The authors performed an integrative survival analysis of CPA glioblastomas. A literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed per PRISMA guidelines. Patient data including demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, management, follow-up, and OS were extracted. The mean age was 39 ± 26.2 years. The mean OS was 8.9 months. Kaplan-Meier log-rank test and univariate Cox proportional-hazards model identified hydrocephalus (log-rank, p = 0.034; HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.94; p = 0.038), chemotherapy (log-rank, p < 0.005; HR 5.66; 95% CI 1.53-20.88; p = 0.009), and radiotherapy (log-rank, p < 0.0001; HR 12.01; 95% CI 3.44-41.89; p < 0.001) as factors influencing OS. Hydrocephalus (HR 3.57; 95% CI 1.07-11.1; p = 0.038) and no adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02-0.59; p < 0.01) remained prognostic on multivariable analysis with fourfold and twofold higher risk for the time-related onset of death, respectively. This should be considered when assessing the risk-to-benefit ratio for patients undergoing surgery for CPA glioblastoma.
Topics: Humans; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Glioblastoma; Cerebellopontine Angle; Survival Analysis; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36932101
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30677-x -
World Neurosurgery Jul 2023Staged surgery for skull base lesions has been utilized to facilitate maximal safe resection and optimize outcomes while minimizing morbidity and complications....
BACKGROUND
Staged surgery for skull base lesions has been utilized to facilitate maximal safe resection and optimize outcomes while minimizing morbidity and complications. Conversely, staged surgery for primary intraparenchymal neoplasms is less commonly performed and has not been reported as extensively within the literature. As such, we performed a systematic review to examine the unique surgical indications for staging, timing between stages, specific surgical approaches utilized, and postoperative complications of staged surgery for primary intra-axial neoplasms.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted in August 2021 using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Titles and abstracts were evaluated independently by 2 authors, after which articles were selected for final analysis based on application of strict inclusion criteria during full text screen. Each included article was then qualitatively assessed and relevant variables-including operative approaches, timing, and outcomes-were extracted for synthesis.
RESULTS
Of 115 results, 7 articles were included for final analysis and consisted of 17 pediatric and 4 adult patients. Staged approaches were more commonly utilized in the pediatric patient population for resection of astrocytoma and glioma. Pediatric patients had a timing of surgeries ranging from 5-10 days between operations, compared with 18 days to 4 months in adult patients. Complications in pediatric patients were most commonly hemiparesis, hydrocephalus, cranial nerve VI and VII palsies, truncal ataxia, and cerebellar mutism, while complications in adult patients included language and abstract thinking deficits, respiratory failure, and motor weakness.
CONCLUSIONS
This study reports the first comprehensive review of staged surgical procedures for primary, intra-axial cranial neoplasms. There exists a large degree of heterogeneity in complications resulting from staged surgeries for intra-axial neoplasms, which are similar to complications associated with single-stage surgery for intraparenchymal lesions as well as multi-stage surgeries for skull base lesions.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Skull Base; Glioma; Astrocytoma; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 36924887
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.03.046 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2023Of all central nervous systems tumors, 10-20% are located in the brainstem; diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is diagnosed in 80% of them. With over five decades... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Of all central nervous systems tumors, 10-20% are located in the brainstem; diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is diagnosed in 80% of them. With over five decades of clinical trial testing, there are no established therapeutic options for DIPG. This research article aims to collate recent clinical trial data and provide a landscape for the most promising therapies that have emerged in the past five years.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane were systematically searched using the following keywords: Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, Pontine, Glioma, Treatment, Therapy, Therapeutics, curative, and/or Management. Both adult and pediatric patients with newly diagnosed or progressive DIPG were considered in the clinical trial setting. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.
RESULTS
A total of 22 trials were included reporting the efficacy and safety outcomes among patients. First, five trials reported outcomes of blood-brain barrier bypass via single or repeated-dose intra-arterial therapy or convection-enhanced delivery. Second, external beam radiation regimens were assessed for safety and efficacy in three trials. Third, four trials administered intravenous treatment without using chemotherapeutic regimens. Fourth, eight trials reported the combinations of one or more chemotherapeutic agents. Fifth, immunotherapy was reported in two trials in an adjuvant monotherapy in the post-radiotherapy setting.
CONCLUSION
This research article captures a clinical picture of the last five years of the direction toward which DIPG research is heading. The article finds that re-irradiation may prolong survival in patients with progressive DIPG; it also instills that insofar palliative radiotherapy has been a key prognostic choice.
PubMed: 36833093
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11040559 -
Brain Sciences Feb 2023Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common comorbidity in patients with brain neoplasms and it may be either the first symptom or develop after the tumor diagnosis.... (Review)
Review
Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is a common comorbidity in patients with brain neoplasms and it may be either the first symptom or develop after the tumor diagnosis. Increasing evidence suggests that brain tumors and BTRE share common pathophysiological mechanisms. Glutamatergic mechanisms can play a central role in promoting both primary brain tumor growth and epileptogenesis. Perampanel (PER), which acts as a selective antagonist of glutamate α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors, may play a role both in the reduction in tumor growth and the control of epileptiform activity. This systematic review aimed to summarize the pre-clinical and clinical evidence about the antitumor properties, antiseizure effects and tolerability of PER in BTRE. Eight pre-clinical and eight clinical studies were identified. The currently available evidence suggests that PER can be an effective and generally well-tolerated therapeutic option in patients with BTRE. In vitro studies demonstrated promising antitumor activity of PER, while no role in slowing tumor progression has been demonstrated in rat models; clinical data on the potential antitumor activity of PER are scarce. Additional studies are needed to explore further the effects of PER on tumor progression and fully characterize its potentialities in patients with BTRE.
PubMed: 36831869
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020326 -
Brain Sciences Jan 2023The most prevalent and deadly primary malignant glioma in adults is glioblastoma (GBM), which has a median survival time of about 15 months. Despite the standard of care... (Review)
Review
The most prevalent and deadly primary malignant glioma in adults is glioblastoma (GBM), which has a median survival time of about 15 months. Despite the standard of care for glioblastoma, which includes gross total resection, high-dose radiation, and temozolomide chemotherapy, this tumor is still one of the most aggressive and difficult to treat. So, it is critical to find more potent therapies that can help glioblastoma patients have better clinical outcomes. Additionally, the prognosis for recurring malignant gliomas is poor, necessitating the need for innovative therapeutics. Immunotherapy is a rather new treatment for glioblastoma and its effects are not well studied when it is combined with standard chemoradiation therapy. We conducted this study to evaluate different glioblastoma immunotherapy approaches in terms of feasibility, efficacy, and safety. We conducted a computer-assisted literature search of electronic databases for essays that are unique, involve either prospective or retrospective research, and are entirely written and published in English. We examined both observational data and randomized clinical trials. Eighteen studies met the criteria for inclusion. In conclusion, combining immunotherapy with radiochemotherapy and tumor removal is generally possible and safe, and rather effective in the prolongation of survival measures.
PubMed: 36831702
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13020159 -
Current Oncology (Toronto, Ont.) Feb 2023Outcomes for patients with high-grade glioma remain poor. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the only drug approved for first-line treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, the most... (Review)
Review
Outcomes for patients with high-grade glioma remain poor. Temozolomide (TMZ) is the only drug approved for first-line treatment of glioblastoma multiforme, the most aggressive form of glioma. Chronotherapy highlights the potential benefit of timed TMZ administration. This is based on pre-clinical studies of enhanced TMZ-induced glioma cytotoxicity dependent on circadian, oscillating expression of key genes involved in apoptosis, DNA damage repair, and cell-cycle mediated cell death. The current systematic review's primary aim was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of TMZ chronotherapy. A systemic review of literature following PRISMA guidelines looking at clinical outcomes on TMZ chronotherapy on gliomas was performed. The search in the English language included three databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane) and five conferences from 1946 to April 2022. Two independent reviewers undertook screening, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment. A descriptive analysis was conducted due to limited data. Of the 269 articles screened, two unique studies were eligible and underwent abstraction for survival and toxicity findings. Both studies-one a retrospective cohort study (n = 166) and the other a prospective randomized feasibility study (n = 35)-were conducted by the same academic group and suggested a trend for improved overall survival, but possibly increased toxicity when TMZ was administered in the morning (vs. evening). There was limited evidence suggesting possible therapeutic value from administering TMZ in the morning, which may be consistent with the pre-clinical observations of the importance of the timing of TMZ administration in vitro. Larger, pragmatic, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to ascertain the value of TMZ chronotherapy to provide optimized and equitable care for this population.
Topics: Humans; Temozolomide; Retrospective Studies; Prospective Studies; Brain Neoplasms; Glioma; Chronotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36826108
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020147