-
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia... 2020Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) usually arises from the abdominal aorta, just below the celiac trunk and it supplies the midgut-derived embryonic structures. Anatomical...
INTRODUCTION
Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) usually arises from the abdominal aorta, just below the celiac trunk and it supplies the midgut-derived embryonic structures. Anatomical variations in this vessel contribute to problems in the formation and/or absorption of this part of the intestine and its absence has been recognized as the cause of congenital duodenojejunal atresia.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze SMA anatomical variations in humans and the possible associated clinical and surgical implications.
METHODS
This is a systematic review of papers indexed in PubMed, SciELO, Springerlink, Science Direct, Lilacs, and Latindex databases. The search was performed by two independent reviewers between September and December 2018. Original studies involving SMA variations in humans were included. SMA presence/absence, level, place of origin and its terminal branches were considered.
RESULTS
At the end of the search, 18 studies were selected, characterized as for the sample, method to evaluate the anatomical structure and main results. The most common type of variation was when SMA originated from the right hepatic artery (6.13%). Two studies (11.11%) evidenced the inferior mesenteric artery originating from the SMA, whereas other two (11.11%) found the SMA sharing the same origin of the celiac trunk.
CONCLUSION
SMA variations are not uncommon findings and their reports evidenced through the scientific literature demonstrate a great role for the development of important clinical conditions, making knowledge about this subject relevant to surgeons and professionals working in this area.
Topics: Celiac Artery; Hepatic Artery; Humans; Mesenteric Artery, Superior; Surgeons
PubMed: 32844880
DOI: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1508 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Jul 2020The evidence supporting management decisions of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) is sparse. Practice guidelines are needed to help patients and surgeons choose between... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The evidence supporting management decisions of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) is sparse. Practice guidelines are needed to help patients and surgeons choose between endovascular and open surgery approaches.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus for studies of patients with VAAs. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed when appropriate.
RESULTS
We included 80 observational studies that were mostly noncomparative. Data were available for 2845 aneurysms, comprising 1279 renal artery, 775 splenic artery, 359 hepatic artery, 226 pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal arteries, 95 superior mesenteric artery, 87 celiac artery, 15 jejunal, ileal and colic arteries, and 9 gastric and gastroepiploic arteries. Differences in mortality between open and endovascular approaches were not statistically significant. The endovascular approach was used more often by surgeons. The endovascular approach was associated with shorter hospital stay and lower rates of cardiovascular complications but higher rates of reintervention. Postembolization syndrome rates ranged from 9% (renal) to 38% (splenic). Coil migration ranged from 8% (splenic) to 29% (renal). Otherwise, access site complication were low (<5%). Pseudoaneurysms tended to have higher mortality and reintervention rates.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review provides event rates for outcomes important to patients with VAAs. Despite the low certainty warranted by the evidence, these rates along, with surgical expertise and anatomic feasibility, can help patients and surgeons in shared-decision making.
Topics: Aneurysm; Arteries; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Viscera
PubMed: 32553135
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.018 -
International Journal of Surgery Case... 2020Mesenteric artery re-vascularization using bypass or angioplasty is a standard of care in atherosclerotic mesenteric vascular disease. However, there are no certain...
INTRODUCTION
Mesenteric artery re-vascularization using bypass or angioplasty is a standard of care in atherosclerotic mesenteric vascular disease. However, there are no certain guidelines for the management of non-atherosclerotic thrombophilic mesenteric vessel disease other than anti-coagulation.
CASE REPORT
We are reporting a case of a 36 years old lady with post-prandial angina and weight loss on the background of anti-phospholipid syndrome having tripple mesentric vessel occlusive disease who underwent 2 vessel aorto-mesenteric bypass. During the post-op course, patient had laparotomy with diversion ileostomy for ischemic perforation of the bowel. At present, after 6 weeks patient is recovering well with improved appetite and resolution of symptoms.
DISCUSSION
There are very few cases reported with acute on chronic mesenteric ischemia in England. Nikolas Melas et al. reported similar history in a 57 yrs old Caucasian female. Morbi AH2 highlights timely diagnosis of acute mesmeric ischemia in a 53 yrs old.
CONCLUSION
This case report is unique in a way that combined mesenteric ischemia and APS is a rare combination in a 36 years old. Mesenteric artery bypass is one of the possible solutions to thrombophilic mesenteric disease, however larger studies with longer follow up are needed.
PubMed: 32446211
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.04.033 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Nov 2020Type II endoleaks are the most common type of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and may cause late sac expansion and rupture. To prevent this,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Type II endoleaks are the most common type of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and may cause late sac expansion and rupture. To prevent this, prophylactic embolization of aortic side branches has been suggested. The aim of this review was to assess the current evidence for this prophylactic treatment and its association with sac size enlargement as well as rate of and reintervention for type II endoleak.
METHODS
This was a systematic review and meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE and Scopus databases were used to search for related articles until March 2019. After screening, original studies reporting outcome comparing patients having prophylactic embolization with those undergoing EVAR without prophylactic embolization were included. An assessment of the quality of the included studies as well as data extraction was performed by two independent observers. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Center, Copenhagen, Denmark).
RESULTS
There were 3777 publications identified. After elimination of duplicate entries and review of titles and abstracts, 13 retrospective cohort studies including 1427 patients comparing prophylactic embolization with standard EVAR therapy were identified. No randomized trials were available. Five of these 13 studies reported sac growth, with a frequency of 7.4% (14/90) in the embolization group vs 13.4% in controls (odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-1). The rate of type II endoleak was 18.5% (100/540) in the embolization group vs 38.6% in the control group (342/887; OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.26-0.44). Based on 10 studies, the rate of reintervention was 1.5% (7/468) in the embolization group vs 12.4% (80/646) in the control group (OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.06-0.24). Nine of these 13 studies showed that technical success of inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar artery embolization was 82.3% and 69.1%, respectively. Regarding complications, 10 of 108 patients (9.3%) in one study reported nonspecific abdominal pain after embolization, and all resolved with overnight rehydration. Only one patient, who previously had right hemicolectomy, died after inferior mesenteric artery embolization of ischemic colitis.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that prophylactic aortic side branch embolization may be associated with lower rate of sac enlargement, incidence of type II endoleaks, and reinterventions. However, high-quality unbiased studies are lacking in this field, and this review and meta-analysis may be affected by selection bias and residual confounders remaining in the retrospective studies. To conclude whether prophylactic embolization should be routinely performed, a prospective, randomized trial is required.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Embolization, Therapeutic; Endoleak; Endovascular Procedures; Humans
PubMed: 32442608
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.05.020 -
Cureus Feb 2020Isolated renal artery dissection (IRAD) is a rare and often unrecognized clinical entity, with a paucity of data on its epidemiology and management. We extracted 129... (Review)
Review
Isolated renal artery dissection (IRAD) is a rare and often unrecognized clinical entity, with a paucity of data on its epidemiology and management. We extracted 129 cases of IRAD from the medical literature between 1972 and 2016. IRAD as a result of an extended dissection from the aorta and splanchnic or mesenteric arteries was excluded. The mean age of presentation was 42.7±12.9 years, with a male predominance (79%). Abdominal pain (75.9%) was the most common presenting symptom. Etiology was more likely to be spontaneous (76%) than traumatic (12%), iatrogenic (9%), or drug-induced (1.5%). The most common risk factors were hypertension (28.7%), fibromuscular dysplasia (8.5%), and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (5.4%). Unilateral renal artery dissection (right 45.5%, left 40.5%) was more frequent than bilateral (14%). More than half (56.6%) of the cohort were managed medically (blood pressure control and /or anticoagulation). Of those who underwent intervention, endovascular stenting or embolization (35%) was utilized more frequently than nephrectomy or bypass (21%). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have the highest diagnostic sensitivity (91% and 93%, respectively) as compared to ultrasonography (27%). A high degree of clinical suspicion is required to diagnose IRAD. CT and MRI have a higher diagnostic sensitivity. As compared to invasive management, conservative management has comparable outcomes.
PubMed: 32076589
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6960 -
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Sep 2020Positive margins in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer, specifically the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin, are associated with worse outcomes. Local...
BACKGROUND
Positive margins in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer, specifically the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) margin, are associated with worse outcomes. Local therapies targeting these margins could impact on recurrence. This study analysed recurrence-patterns to identify whether strategies to control local disease could have a meaningful impact.
METHODS
(I) Systematic review to define recurrence patterns and resection margin status. (II) Additional retrospective study of PD performed at our centre.
RESULTS
In the systematic review, 23/617 evaluated studies were included (n = 3815). Local recurrence was observed in 7-69%. SMA margin (6 studies) was positive in 15-35%. In the retrospective study (n = 204), local recurrence was more frequently observed with a positive SMA margin (66 vs.45%; p = 0.005). Furthermore, in a multivariate cox-proportional hazard model, only a positive SMA margin was associated with disease recurrence (HR 1.615; 95%CI 1.127-2.315; p = 0.009). Interestingly, median overall survival was 20 months and similar for patients who developed local only, metastases only or simultaneous recurrence (p = 0.124).
CONCLUSION
Local recurrence of pancreatic cancer is common and associated with similar mortality rates as those who present with simultaneous or metastatic recurrence. Involvement of the SMA margin is an independent predictor for disease progression and should be the target of future adjuvant local therapies.
Topics: Humans; Margins of Excision; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 32046922
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.01.005 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Nov 2019The evidence supporting management decisions of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) is sparse. Practice guidelines are needed to help patients and surgeons choose between... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The evidence supporting management decisions of visceral artery aneurysms (VAAs) is sparse. Practice guidelines are needed to help patients and surgeons choose between endovascular and open surgery approaches.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and Scopus for studies of patients with VAAs. Studies were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed when appropriate.
RESULTS
We included 80 observational studies that were mostly noncomparative. Data were available for 2845 aneurysms, comprising 1279 renal artery, 775 splenic artery, 359 hepatic artery, 226 pancreaticoduodenal and gastroduodenal arteries, 95 superior mesenteric artery, 87 celiac artery, 15 jejunal, ileal and colic arteries, and 9 gastric and gastroepiploic arteries. Differences in mortality between open and endovascular approaches were not statistically significant. The endovascular approach was used more often by surgeons. The endovascular approach was associated with shorter hospital stay and lower rates of cardiovascular complications but higher rates of reintervention. Postembolization syndrome rates ranged from 9% (renal) to 38% (splenic). Coil migration ranged from 8% (splenic) to 29% (renal). Otherwise, access site complication were low (<5%). Pseudoaneurysms tended to have higher mortality and reintervention rates.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review provides event rates for outcomes important to patients with VAAs. Despite the low certainty warranted by the evidence, these rates along, with surgical expertise and anatomic feasibility, can help patients and surgeons in shared-decision making.
Topics: Aneurysm; Arteries; Decision Making, Shared; Embolization, Therapeutic; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Surgical Procedures; Viscera
PubMed: 31126761
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.024 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2019In the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, we are currently uncertain of the benefits and harms of standard pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared to...
BACKGROUND
In the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, we are currently uncertain of the benefits and harms of standard pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) compared to extended PLND.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of extended versus standard PLND in patients undergoing cystectomy to treat muscle-invasive (cT2 and cT3) and treatment-refractory, non-muscle-invasive (cT1 with or without carcinoma in situ) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.
SEARCH METHODS
We performed a comprehensive literature search using multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and LILACS), trial registries, and conference proceedings published up to April 29, 2019, with no restrictions on the language or status of publication.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials in which participants underwent radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive or therapy-refractory non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder with either an extended PLND with a superior extent reaching as far cranially as the inferior mesenteric vein, or a standard PLND with a superior extent of the bifurcation of the internal and external iliac artery, with otherwise the same anatomical boundaries.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the included studies and extracted data from them for the primary outcomes: time to death from any cause, time to death from bladder cancer and Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications grade III-V, and the secondary outcomes: time to recurrence, Clavien-Dindo I-II complications and disease-specific quality of life.We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and rated the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
The search identified one multicenter trial based in Germany that enrolled 401 participants with histologically confirmed T1 grade 3 or muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma. The median age was 67 years (range: 59 to 74) and the majority of participants were male (78.3%). No participant received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; a small subset received adjuvant chemotherapy (14.5%).Primary outcomesOur results indicate that extended PLND may reduce the risk of death from any cause over time as compared to standard PLND, but the confidence interval includes the possibility of no effect (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57 to 1.07, 401 participants, low-certainty evidence). After five years of follow-up, this may result in 83 fewer deaths (95% CI: 174 fewer to 24 more overall deaths) per 1000 participants: 420 deaths for extended PLND compared to 503 deaths per 1000 for standard PLND. We downgraded the certainty of evidence by two levels due to study limitations and imprecision.Our results indicate that extended PLND may reduce the risk of death from bladder cancer over time as compared to standard PLND but, again, the confidence interval includes the possibility of no effect (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.07, participants = 401, low-certainty evidence). After five years of follow-up, this corresponds to 91 fewer deaths per 1000 participants (95% CI: 176 fewer to 19 more bladder cancer deaths): 264 deaths for extended PLND compared to 355 deaths per 1000 for standard PLND. We downgraded the certainty of evidence by two levels due to study limitations and imprecision.Based on follow-up of up to 30 days, we are uncertain whether extended PLND leads to more grade III-V complications as compared to standard PLND, because of study limitations and imprecision (risk ratio [RR]: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.52, participants = 401, very low-certainty evidence).Secondary outcomesWe are uncertain whether extended PLND reduces the risk of recurrence over time as compared to standard PLND, because of study limitations and imprecision (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.58 to 1.22, participants = 401, very low-certainty evidence).Based on follow-up of up to 30 days, we are uncertain whether extended PLND leads to similar grade I-II complications as compared to standard PLND because of study limitations and imprecision (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.19, participants = 401, very low-certainty evidence).We found no trials that reported on disease-specific quality of life.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Results from a single trial indicate that extended PLND in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder may reduce death from any cause and death from bladder cancer over time; however, the results include the possibility of no effect. We are uncertain whether the risk of serious complications up to 30 days may be increased. We are also uncertain as to whether the risk of recurrence over time or the risk of minor complications up to 30 days changes. We were unable to conduct any of the preplanned subgroup analyses, in particular, analyses based on extended lymph node dissection templates, clinical tumor stage, and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy that may be important effect modifiers. Important additional data is expected from a larger, ongoing trial that will also consider the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Inclusion of this trial in the meta-analysis may help address the issue of imprecision which was a common reason for downgrading the certainty of the evidence.
Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell; Cystectomy; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 31111956
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013336 -
Korean Circulation Journal May 2019The objective of this study was to analyze the three different management modalities for isolated superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection. We did a comprehensive... (Review)
Review
The objective of this study was to analyze the three different management modalities for isolated superior mesenteric artery (SMA) dissection. We did a comprehensive literature search and found 703 articles on the initial search, out of which 111 articles consisting of 145 patients were selected for analysis. The mean age was 55.7 years (standard deviation,9.7;33-85) and 80.6% were male. These patients were managed conservatively (41.3%), endovascularly (28.1%) or surgically (30%). The median follow-up was 10 months (interquartile range [IQR], 4-18 months), 12 months (IQR, 6-19 months) and 14 months (IQR, 6-20 months) respectively. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) was the most commonly used diagnostic tool in the conservative group (43.8%), while conventional CT scan was the most widely used in endovascular (58.1%) and surgical group (50%). 17% percent of the conservative group had SMA angiography for diagnosis, while this was less than 3% in the other groups. Of these patients, 96.7%, 97.4%, and 100.0% recovered successfully in the conservative, endovascular, and surgical groups respectively. There was no significant difference in the mortality between the three groups (Pearson χ²=0.482). This suggests a conservative and endovascular approach could be used in most patients, which can reduce costs and surgery-related morbidity and mortality. Surgical management should be reserved for cases having infarction or widespread bowel ischemia and in cases where other treatment modalities fail.
PubMed: 31074212
DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0429 -
Medicine Feb 2019It remains unclear whether or not preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) for colorectal cancer surgery. The objective of this updated systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
It remains unclear whether or not preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) for colorectal cancer surgery. The objective of this updated systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the current scientific evidence of LCA non-preservation versus LCA preservation in colorectal cancer surgery.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and reference without limits. Quality of studies was evaluated by using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias. Effective sizes were pooled under a random- or fixed-effects model. The funnel plot was used to assess the publication bias. The outcomes of interest were oncologic consideration including the number of apical lymph nodes, overall recurrence, 5-years overall survival, and 5-years disease-free survival (DFS); safety consideration including overall 30-day postoperative morbidity and overall 30-day postoperative mortality; anatomic consideration including anastomotic circulation, anastomotic leakage, urogenital, and defaecatory dysfunction.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies including 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 cohort studies with a total of 8456 patients (4058 patients underwent LCA non-preservation surgery vs 4398 patients underwent LCA preservation surgery) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The preservation of LCA was associated with significantly less anastomotic leakage (odds ratio 1.23, 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.48, P = .03). In term of sexual dysfunction, urinary retention, the number of apical lymph nodes, and long-term oncologic outcomes, there were no significant differences between the LCA non-preservation and LCA preservation group. It was hard to draw definitive conclusions on other outcomes including operation time, blood loss, the first postoperative exhaust time, and perioperative morbidity and mortality for insufficient data and highly significant heterogeneity among studies.
CONCLUSIONS
The pooled data provided evidence to support the LCA preservation preferred over LCA non-preservation in anastomotic leakage. Future more large-volume, well-designed RCTs with extensive follow-up are needed to draw a definitive conclusion on this dilemma.
Topics: Anastomotic Leak; Blood Loss, Surgical; China; Colorectal Neoplasms; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Humans; Mesenteric Artery, Inferior; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 30702552
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013720