-
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand... Feb 2024This review was performed to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of the first dorsal metacarpal artery flaps (FDMAF) and reverse homodigital dorsal flaps... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This review was performed to systematically compare the effectiveness and safety of the first dorsal metacarpal artery flaps (FDMAF) and reverse homodigital dorsal flaps (RHDF) for thumb reconstruction.
METHODS
All literatures, which compared FDMAF versus RHDF for thumb reconstruction, were acquired through a comprehensive search in multiple databases from inception until 31st August 2022. A meta-analysis was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.4 software.
RESULTS
A total of 19 articles were retrieved, comprising 396 patients in the FDMAF group and 423 patients in the RHDF group. The pooled estimates suggested that there were no significant differences in venous congestion, complications about flap necrosis and reduced range of motion (ROM) of thumb, static 2-point discrimination (S-2PD) between the two groups. On the other hand, patients in the RHDF group had less vascular crisis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.15, 95%CI, 1.31-7.56), complications about poor cortical reorientation (OR = 440.02, 95%CI, 91.97-2105.27) and higher satisfaction rate (OR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33-0.96) than those in the FDMAF group.
CONCLUSIONS
The two surgical procedures were both safe and reliable since no significant differences were found in flap necrosis between the two groups. However, the patients in the RHDF group had less complications about vascular crisis, poor cortical reorientation and higher satisfaction rate. Accordingly, we thought RHDF may be more superior for thumb reconstruction than FDMAF.
Topics: Humans; Thumb; Metacarpal Bones; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Arteries; Necrosis
PubMed: 38407389
DOI: 10.2340/jphs.v59.12435 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Feb 2024: Metacarpal non-unions are complex hand defects that can lead to severe hand impairment. Treatment may require the use of artificial or autologous bone grafts. This... (Review)
Review
: Metacarpal non-unions are complex hand defects that can lead to severe hand impairment. Treatment may require the use of artificial or autologous bone grafts. This systematic review aims to describe the outcomes of bone grafting following metacarpal non-union in an attempt to establish an optimal therapeutic protocol for this complication. : A systematic review was conducted in adherence with PRISMA guidelines. Data collection and analysis were performed in duplicate and confirmed by a third investigator. Our primary outcomes focused on radiological time to bone fusion and rates of non-union. Additionally, functional outcomes and complications were analyzed as means of central tendency. : Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, accounting for a total of 47 patients. The average follow-up time was 12.4 months. Fourteen studies analyzed radiological outcomes, with atrophic non-union representing the most common type. The time to bone fusion, assessed radiologically, following bone graft was an average of 6.9 months (n = 14), with a 100% rate of union in 42 patients. Regarding patient-reported pain improvement, 76% of patients experienced pain relief. Moreover, all patients reported a complete subjective return to baseline hand function. Adverse events, limited to hematoma and seroma, were seen in three patients, representing a complication rate of 11.8% in the examined population. : Metacarpal non-union can be treated successfully via vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafting. Based on the available evidence, bone grafts demonstrate favorable union rates, post-operative pain reduction, hand function recovery, earlier bone fusion times, and minimal complications in the context of metacarpal non-union management.
PubMed: 38398461
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041148 -
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery... Apr 2024The photodynamic bone stabilization system (PBSS) was was developed in 2010, and in 2018 gained FDA approval in the United States. Given its relative novelty, our... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The photodynamic bone stabilization system (PBSS) was was developed in 2010, and in 2018 gained FDA approval in the United States. Given its relative novelty, our analysis sought to analyze the available literature exploring the indications, outcomes, and complications of the PBSS.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO registration of study protocol: CRD42022363065, October 8th, 2022). PubMed, EBSCOHost, and Google Scholar electronic databases were queried to identify articles evaluating PBSS in the treatment of pathologic or traumatic fractures between January 1 2010 and 15 October 2022. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies tool.
RESULTS
Our initial search yielded 326 publications, which were then screened for appropriate studies that aligned with the purpose of our review. A total of thirteen studies, comprising seven case series, four case reports, and two cohort studies. The total sample size of the included studies consisted of 345 patients, with 242 females (70%) and 103 males (30%). The implants were most commonly utilized in the humerus (41%), radius (12%), and metacarpal (12%). The most common complications were related to broken implants (5%) and dislocation (1%). Most studies reported complete fracture healing and return of full strength and range of motion.
CONCLUSION
Despite being a relatively novel technology, PBSS appears to be a viable option for fracture stabilization. Most studies included in our analysis reported complete fracture healing and return of function with minimal complications.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Fractures, Spontaneous; Fractures, Bone; Fracture Healing; Joint Dislocations; Patient Reported Outcome Measures
PubMed: 38376586
DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03833-w -
Cureus Apr 2023Hand compartment syndrome is a limb-threatening emergency. Although it is a relatively uncommon condition, early diagnosis, and urgent fasciotomy can prevent... (Review)
Review
Hand compartment syndrome is a limb-threatening emergency. Although it is a relatively uncommon condition, early diagnosis, and urgent fasciotomy can prevent irreversible ischemia, myonecrosis, nerve dysfunction, and subsequently permanent loss of hand functions. The occurrence of hand compartment syndrome is relatively infrequent, resulting in a limited amount of literature on its causes. As a result, we conducted a systematic review to provide the most comprehensive data regarding the etiology of traumatic hand compartment syndrome. This systematic review was conducted and reported in light of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. We searched among Medline, and EBSCO Database, with no restriction on the dates (last date of the systematic search was done on April 28, 2022). We included all studies containing data regarding traumatic hand compartment syndrome. A total of 29 articles with 129 patients constituted the basis of this review. The etiology of traumatic hand compartment syndrome was classified into three groups: soft tissue injury-related, fracture-related, and vascular injury-related causes. The most common etiology of hand compartment was related to soft tissue injuries which constituted 86.8% of all etiologies, followed by fracture-related (5.4%), then vascular injury-related (1.5%). Further, burns were the most likely injury to lead to hand compartment syndrome which made up 63.4% of soft-tissue injuries, followed by animal bites (8.9%). Hand compartment syndrome can be caused by multiple etiologies that affect people of different ages. Therefore, identifying the most prevalent causes can help in early detection of compartment syndrome by frequent assessment of patients that present with the most prevalent causes like burn among soft tissue injuries and metacarpal bone fracture among fractures.
PubMed: 37252461
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38218 -
Cureus Aug 2022A closed fifth metacarpal neck fracture is a frequently encountered upper limb fracture that occurs when the bone breaks right below the little finger's knuckle. At the... (Review)
Review
A closed fifth metacarpal neck fracture is a frequently encountered upper limb fracture that occurs when the bone breaks right below the little finger's knuckle. At the moment, there is no agreement on the best way to treat these fractures. This research seeks to look at the efficacy of buddy taping versus reduction and casting for non-operative management of uncomplicated closed fifth metacarpal neck fractures. A systematic review of PubMed, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), PubMed Central (PMC), and the Cochrane Library databases was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to find relevant studies about buddy taping versus reduction and casting for non-operative management. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score; satisfaction score; visual analog scale (VAS); range of motion (ROM); strength; and other outcomes were reported in this study. We used Review Manager 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK) for the meta-analysis. Seven trials with a total of 454 patients were considered in the review and four in the quantitative analysis. All the included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our study concluded that buddy taping was effective for improving pain, range of motion, and strength. The DASH score and satisfaction score didn't show any significant difference. Thus, we recommend the use of buddy taping rather than plaster and immobilization for the management of uncomplicated closed fifth metacarpal neck fractures.
PubMed: 36176848
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28437 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Sep 2021The term acrometastases (AM) refers to secondary lesions sited distally to the elbow and knee, representing 0.1% of all bony metastases. By frequency, pulmonary cancer... (Review)
Review
The term acrometastases (AM) refers to secondary lesions sited distally to the elbow and knee, representing 0.1% of all bony metastases. By frequency, pulmonary cancer and gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract neoplasms are the most responsible for the reported AM. Improvements in oncologic patient care favor an increase in the incidence of such rare cases. We performed a systematic review of acrometastases to the hand to provide further insight into the management of these fragile patients. We also present a peculiar case of simultaneous acrometastasis to the ring finger and pathological vertebral fracture. A literature search according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement was conducted using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases in December 2020 on metastasis to the hand and wrist, from 1986 to 2020. MeSH terms included acrometastasis, carpal metastasis, hand metastasis, finger metastasis, phalangeal metastasis, and wrist metastasis. In total, 215 studies reporting the follow-up of 247 patients were analyzed, with a median age of 62 years (range 10-91 years). Overall, 162 out of 247 patients were males (65.6%) and 85 were females (34.4%). The median reported follow-up was 5 months (range 0.5-39). The median time from primary tumor diagnosis to acrometastasis was 24 months (range 0.7-156). Acrometastases were located at the finger/phalanx (68.4%), carpal (14.2%), metacarpal (14.2%), or other sites (3.2%). The primary tumors were pulmonary in 91 patients (36.8%). The average interval from primary tumor diagnosis to acrometastasis varied according to the primary tumor type from 2 months (in patients with mesenchymal tumors) to 64.0 months (in patients with breast cancer). Acrometastases usually develop in the late stage of oncologic disease and are associated with short life expectancy. Their occurrence can no longer be considered rare; physicians should thus be updated on their surgical management and their impact on prognosis and survival.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Neoplasms; Child; Female; Finger Phalanges; Fingers; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Young Adult
PubMed: 34577873
DOI: 10.3390/medicina57090950 -
Hand (New York, N.Y.) Jan 2023Common forms of fixation of metacarpal fractures have historically included percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, plates and screws, and, more recently, intramedullary... (Review)
Review
Common forms of fixation of metacarpal fractures have historically included percutaneous Kirschner wire fixation, plates and screws, and, more recently, intramedullary screw fixation. Retrograde intramedullary screws (RISs) are a novel modality first described 10 years ago. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the published literature assessing outcomes of RIS fixation for metacarpal fractures and create a complication profile for this novel technique. A comprehensive literature search was performed using electronic databases for both clinical and biomechanical studies in relation to RIS fixation published from 2000 to 2020. A total of 19 studies (13 clinical and 6 biomechanical) met the inclusion criteria. The clinical studies examined 603 metacarpal fractures and demonstrated adequate functional outcomes in terms of grip strength, total active motion, and time to return to work. The biomechanical studies examined 80 metacarpal fractures, finding that load to failure in RISs was often equal to or higher than Kirschner wires but less than plate and screws. The complication rate in reviewed studies was 2.8%, with the most prevalent complications being stiffness and extension lag. RIS use in metacarpal fractures appears to provide adequate stability with satisfactory clinical outcomes and minimal complications, although more high-quality studies are needed to fully examine this modality.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Metacarpal Bones; Fractures, Bone; Bone Screws; Bone Wires; Hand Injuries
PubMed: 33530708
DOI: 10.1177/1558944720988073 -
Hand (New York, N.Y.) Sep 2022Metacarpal shaft fractures are common hand injuries that predominantly affect younger patients. There is wide variability in their treatment with no consensus on best...
Metacarpal shaft fractures are common hand injuries that predominantly affect younger patients. There is wide variability in their treatment with no consensus on best practice. We performed a systematic review to assess the breadth and quality of available evidence supporting different treatment modalities for metacarpal shaft fractures of the finger digits in adults. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A total of 1600 records were identified; 7 studies fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included. No randomized controlled trials directly comparing surgery with nonsurgical treatment were found. One retrospective study compared nonsurgical with surgical treatment, whereas 6 compared surgical or nonsurgical treatments. Considerable heterogeneity between studies along with a high or critical risk of bias restricts direct comparison and conclusions. There is a lack of high-quality evidence to guide treatment, supporting the need for well-designed, multicenter trials to identify the most effective and cost-efficient treatment for metacarpal shaft fractures in adults.
Topics: Adult; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Fractures, Bone; Hand Injuries; Humans; Metacarpal Bones; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33252278
DOI: 10.1177/1558944720974363 -
Orthopedic Reviews Jun 2020Aneurysmal bone cysts are benign, rare bony tumours frequently observed among children and young adults principally located in the long bones, pelvis, and spine and...
Aneurysmal bone cysts are benign, rare bony tumours frequently observed among children and young adults principally located in the long bones, pelvis, and spine and rarely in other anatomical district such as the hand. We report the case of a 12-year-old girl with an aneurysmal bone cyst, in active stage, involving the still-open epiphysis of the fourth metacarpal of the right hand, which was in a first time treated by curettage, and 3 months later, occurring a recurrence, by a radically excision of the bone and reconstruction with a graft from the iliac crest. At 10-year follow-up the patient had good cosmetic results and a functioning hand. We also performed a systematic Literature review in order to retrieve the key information regarding: the diagnosis, the clinical features and the treatment.
PubMed: 32913594
DOI: 10.4081/or.2020.8658 -
Hand (New York, N.Y.) May 2022Ulnar metacarpal base fractures can destabilize the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, prompting surgical stabilization. Studies investigating this injury are limited by small...
BACKGROUND
Ulnar metacarpal base fractures can destabilize the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, prompting surgical stabilization. Studies investigating this injury are limited by small case volumes. Our purpose is to review the surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications of ulnar CMC joint stabilization.
METHODS
A literature search was performed of all articles published on the surgical treatment and outcomes of ulnar CMC fracture dislocations using PubMed and Google Scholar databases between the years 2014 and 2019. Data were pooled and analyzed, assessing surgical techniques and hand outcome measures: union, recurrent dislocations, range of motion, grip strength, and complications.
RESULTS
Six studies met inclusion criteria. All surgical patients, regardless of technique, went on to union with no incidents of recurrent instability. Grip strength was significantly decreased postoperatively (82.7% of uninjured side). Patients with CMC dislocations of both the fourth and fifth ray had similar postoperative outcomes to those with CMC dislocations of the fifth ray alone. One third of plate and screw constructs required plate removal, due to breakage (2) or implant-related pain (4). Plate-related symptoms resolved after removal in all cases. Delayed treatment decreased the effectiveness of nonoperative treatment, and increased the likelihood of postoperative pain, chronic deformity, malunion, and CMC osteoarthritis.
CONCLUSIONS
Closed reduction percutaneous pinning, open reduction percutaneous pinning, and open reduction internal fixation with CMC joint bridging or dorsal buttress plating are all well described, safe techniques with low complication rates. Early, accurate diagnosis of fourth and fifth CMC joint fracture-dislocations is crucial for optimizing hand function and postoperative outcomes.
Topics: Bone Plates; Carpometacarpal Joints; Fracture Dislocation; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Metacarpal Bones; Ulna Fractures
PubMed: 32772579
DOI: 10.1177/1558944720948241