-
Advances in Radiation Oncology Jul 2024Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival benefits. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the addition of local therapy to systemic treatments in patients with advanced EC.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Key eligibility criteria included studies that enrolled patients with histologically confirmed EC or esophagogastric junction cancer with metastasis or recurrence and compared survival benefits between the combined local and systemic treatment group and the systemic treatment alone group. Survival outcomes, represented by hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were pooled using a random effects model. The MINORS score was adopted for quality assessment. Risk of bias was statistically examined by Begg's and Egger's tests.
RESULTS
A total of 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 qualified retrospective studies including 14,489 patients were identified. Addition of local therapy to systemic treatment significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; < .001) and OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81; < .0001) compared with systemic treatment alone. The subgroup analysis revealed that combined local and systemic treatment conferred a significant survival advantage in both patients with oligometastasis (PFS: HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; < .0001; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; < .0001) and recurrence (OS: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; = .002).
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, addition of local treatment to systemic therapy can improve survival in patients with advanced EC, particularly in those with oligometastasis or recurrent diseases.
PubMed: 38826154
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101522 -
BMC Cancer Jun 2024Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The first and second lines of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include chemotherapy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Colorectal cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The first and second lines of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil. However, treatment following progression on the first and second line is still unclear. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies investigating the use of trifluridine-tipiracil with bevacizumab versus trifluridine-tipiracil alone for mCRC. We used RStudio version 4.2.3; and we considered p < 0.05 significant. Seven studies and 1,182 patients were included - 602 (51%) received trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab. Compared with control, the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.42-0.63; p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.52-0.70; p < 0.001) were significantly higher with bevacizumab. The objective response rate (ORR) (RR 3.14; 95% CI 1.51-6.51; p = 0.002) and disease control rate (DCR) (RR 1.66; 95% CI 1.28-2.16; p = 0.0001) favored the intervention. Regarding adverse events, the intervention had a higher rate of neutropenia (RR 1.38; 95% CI 1.19-1.59; p = 0.00001), whereas the monotherapy group had a higher risk of anemia (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.44-0.82; p = 0.001). Our results support that the addition of bevacizumab is associated with a significant benefit in PFS, OS, ORR and DCR.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Bevacizumab; Trifluridine; Thymine; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Pyrrolidines; Drug Combinations; Neoplasm Metastasis; Progression-Free Survival; Uracil; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
PubMed: 38825703
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12447-8 -
Journal of Vascular and Interventional... May 2024To analyze the effectiveness of image-guided energy ablation techniques with and without concurrent therapies in providing palliative pain relief in patients with bone... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To analyze the effectiveness of image-guided energy ablation techniques with and without concurrent therapies in providing palliative pain relief in patients with bone metastases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
OVID Embase, OVID Medline, and Pubmed were searched from inception to April 14th, 2023 using search terms relating to bone lesions and MeSH terms regarding ablation therapy. English peer-reviewed primary articles were included that reported pain scores following image-guided energy-based ablation of bone metastases. Exclusion criteria included 1) non-palliative treatment, 2) pain scores associated with specific treatment modalities not reported, and 3) non-metastatic bone lesions. Mean percentage reduction in pain score was calculated.
RESULTS
1396 studies were screened and 54 were included. All but one study demonstrated decreased pain scores at final follow-up. Mean reduction in pain scores at final follow-up were 49% for radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 58% for radiofrequency ablation and adjunct (RFA-A), 54% for cryoablation (CA), 72% for cryoablation and adjunct (CA-A), 48% for microwave ablation (MWA), 81% for microwave ablation and adjunct (MWA-A), and 64% for high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). Post-procedural adverse event rates were 4.9% for RFA, 34.8% for RFA-A, 9.6% for CA, 12.0% for CA-A, 48.9% for MWA, 33.5% for MWA-A and 17.0% for HIFU.
CONCLUSION
Image-guided energy ablation demonstrated consistently strong reduction in pain across all modalities, with variable post-procedural adverse event rates. Due to heterogeneity of included studies, quantitative analysis was not appropriate. Future primary research should focus on creating consistent prospective studies with established statistical power, explicit documentation and comparison to other techniques.
PubMed: 38815751
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.05.011 -
Revista Peruana de Medicina... May 2024Motivation for the study. Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer were evaluated, focusing on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) compared... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE.
Motivation for the study. Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer were evaluated, focusing on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) compared to other anti-HER2 therapies. Main findings. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap emerged as promising alternatives, showing substantial improvements in progression-free survival for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. T-DM1 showed superior efficacy to the other treatments. Implications. Our findings could inform healthcare decision-making processes to optimize strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer, and potentially improve health outcomes and quality of life. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) versus other anti-HER2 therapies in HER2+ breast cancer (BC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS.
We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our study focused on patients undergoing treatment for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC), which included regimens involving trastuzumab and taxanes. Additionally, we considered cases within the first 6 months of treatment for HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC).
RESULTS.
A total of 23 RCTs and 41 reports were included in our analysis. LABC and mBC showed no statistically significant difference in any of the comparisons of T-DM1 versus the other anti-HER2+ therapies. When assessing progression-free survival (PFS), trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap demonstrated greater efficacy compared to other treatments (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.75-4.63 and HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.35-2.44; respectively), while T-DM1 alone exhibited superior effectiveness compared to LapCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.77), TrasCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.91), LapCapCitu (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.33-1.10), Nera (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39-0.77), and Cap (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28-0.49).
CONCLUSIONS.
NMA allows a ranking based on the comparative efficacy and safety among the interventions available. Although superior to other schemes, T-DM1 showed a lower efficacy performance in PFS and overall response rate and a trend towards worse overall survival than T-DXd.
Topics: Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Female; Receptor, ErbB-2; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Trastuzumab; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Neoplasm Metastasis; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Maytansine
PubMed: 38808848
DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.411.13351 -
Cancers May 2024Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of deadliest metastatic patterns of gastric cancer, being associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Up to now,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Peritoneal carcinomatosis is one of deadliest metastatic patterns of gastric cancer, being associated with a median overall survival (OS) of 4 months. Up to now, palliative systemic chemotherapy (pSC) has been the only recommended treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate a potential survival benefit after CRS + HIPEC compared to pSC.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in March 2024. Manuscripts reporting patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with CRS + HIPEC were included. A meta-analysis was performed, comparing the survival results between the CRS + HIPEC and pSC groups, and the primary outcome was the comparison in terms of OS. We performed random-effects meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs). We assessed heterogeneity using the Q2 statistic.
RESULTS
Out of the 24 papers included, 1369 patients underwent CRS + HIPEC, with a median OS range of 9.8-28.2 months; and 103 patients underwent pSC, with a median OS range of 4.9-8 months. CRS + HIPEC was associated with significantly increased survival compared to palliative systemic chemotherapy (-1.8954 (95% CI: -2.5761 to -1.2146; < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CRS + HIPEC could provide survival advantages in gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis compared to pSC.
PubMed: 38792007
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101929 -
PeerJ 2024To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab instead of cisplatin in combination with downstaging radiotherapy for papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic evaluation and meta-analysis of the prognosis of down-staging human papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma using cetuximab combined with radiotherapy instead of cisplatin combined with radiotherapy.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab instead of cisplatin in combination with downstaging radiotherapy for papillomavirus (HPV) positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV OPSCC).
DESIGN
Meta-analysis and systematic evaluation.
DATA SOURCES
The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases were searched up to June 8, 2023, as well as Clinicaltrials.gov Clinical Trials Registry, China Knowledge Network, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and Wiprojournal.com.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
Randomized controlled trials reporting results of standard regimens of cetuximab + radiotherapy vs cisplatin + radiotherapy in treating HPV OPSCC were included. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local regional failure rate (LRF), distant metastasis rate (DM), and adverse events (AE).
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. The HR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for survival analysis, while the OR and its 95% CI were used as the effect analysis statistic for dichotomous variables. These statistics were extracted by the reviewers and aggregated using a fixed-effects model to synthesise the data.
RESULTS
A total of 874 relevant papers were obtained from the initial search, and five papers that met the inclusion criteria were included; a total of 1,617 patients with HPV OPSCC were enrolled in these studies. Meta-analysis showed that OS and PFS were significantly shorter in the cetuximab + radiotherapy group of patients with HPV OPSCC compared with those in the conventional cisplatin + radiotherapy group (HR = 2.10, 95% CI [1.39-3.15], = 0.0004; HR = 1.79, 95% CI [1.40-2.29], < 0.0001); LRF and DM were significantly increased (HR = 2.22, 95% CI [1.58-3.11], < 0.0001; HR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.07-2.58], = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in overall grade 3 to 4, acute and late AE overall (OR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.65-1.13], = 0.28).
CONCLUSIONS
Cisplatin + radiotherapy remains the standard treatment for HPV OPSCC. According to the 7th edition AJCC/UICC criteria, low-risk HPV OPSCC patients with a smoking history of ≤ 10 packs/year and non-pharyngeal tumors not involved in lymphatic metastasis had similar survival outcomes with cetuximab/cisplatin + radiotherapy. However, further clinical trials are necessary to determine whether cetuximab + radiotherapy can replace cisplatin + radiotherapy for degraded treatment in individuals who meet the aforementioned characteristics, particularly those with platinum drug allergies.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42023445619.
Topics: Humans; Cetuximab; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms; Cisplatin; Chemoradiotherapy; Papillomavirus Infections; Prognosis; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Neoplasm Staging; Papillomaviridae; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Progression-Free Survival; Human Papillomavirus Viruses
PubMed: 38784388
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17391 -
Oncology Reviews 2024Lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer is a critical prognostic factor associated with higher recurrence and decreased survival. A survival benefit is reported with...
Lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer is a critical prognostic factor associated with higher recurrence and decreased survival. A survival benefit is reported with adjuvant radiotherapy but with potential significant morbidity. We aim to clarify whether there is high-quality evidence to support the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in this setting. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy to locoregional metastatic nodal areas. We conducted a comprehensive and systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the National Cancer Institute. We considered only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We identified 1,760 records and finally retrieved only one eligible RCT (114 participants with positive inguinofemoral lymph nodes). All women had undergone radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy and had been randomized to adjuvant radiotherapy or to intraoperative ipsilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. At 6 years, the overall survival (OS) was 51% versus 41% in favor of radiotherapy (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.30-1.3) without significance and with very low certainty of evidence. At 6 year, the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 29% versus 51% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28-0.87). Recurrence-free survival at 6 years was 59% after adjuvant radiotherapy versus 48% after pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.88). Three (5.3%) versus 13 (24.1%) groin recurrences were noted, respectively, in the adjuvant radiotherapy and pelvic lymphadenectomy groups. There was no significant difference in acute toxicities for pelvic lymphadenectomy compared to radiotherapy. In women with positive pelvic lymph nodes (20%), the OS at 6 year was 36% compared with 13% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy. Late cutaneous toxicity rate appeared to be greater after radiotherapy (19% vs. 15%) but with less chronic lymphedema (16% vs. 22%). There is only very low-quality evidence on administering adjuvant radiotherapy for inguinal lymph node metastases. Although the identified study was a multicenter RCT, there was a reasonable imprecision and inconsistency because of small study numbers, wide confidence intervals in the data, and early trial closure, resulting in downgrading of the evidence.
PubMed: 38774492
DOI: 10.3389/or.2024.1389035 -
Heliyon May 2024To evaluate the efficacy of different combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer...
Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced driver-gene negative non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy of different combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
We obtained relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to May 31, 2023. The analysis of clinical prognostic factors was performed using R 4.2.3 and STATA 15.0. The main outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events of grade 3-5 severity (Grade ≥3 TRAE).
RESULTS
A total of 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted between 2012 and 2023, involving 7792 patients. These trials evaluated 11 different treatment methods. The results of these trials showed that in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the combination of tislelizumab with chemotherapy and the combination of camrelizumab with chemotherapy were particularly effective. Moreover, when compared with other combination therapies, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy showed superiority in terms of disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). Subgroup analyses further demonstrated that the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS in patients without liver metastasis and in those with brain metastasis. Additionally, carboplatin-based combination therapy was found to confer favorable survival benefits in terms of PFS, while cisplatin-based combination therapy showed the most favorable outcomes in terms of OS. The results of subgroup analyses for overall survival (OS) showed that the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy yielded positive outcomes in specific subgroups. These subgroups were characterized by PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of 50 % or higher, usage of anti-PD-1 medications, age below 65, male gender, smoking history, and non-squamous cell carcinoma histology. Superior effectiveness was demonstrated only in extending the progression-free survival (PFS) of female patients and patients with squamous carcinoma. Meanwhile, other patient cohorts did not show the same level of improvement.
CONCLUSIONS
Tislelizumab, camrelizumab or pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy may be the optimal first-line treatment strategies for NSCLC.
PubMed: 38774326
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30809 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... May 2024In patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to...
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
In patients requiring prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs), hippocampal avoidance (HA) has been shown to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life. Here, we aim to estimate the incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs and the subsequent risk of local undertreatment in patients undergoing hippocampal sparing radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched with the terms "Hippocampus", "Brain Neoplasms", and related terms. Trials reporting on the incidence of hippocampal and/or perihippocampal BMs or hippocampal failure rate after PCI or WBRT were included.
RESULTS
Forty records were included, encompassing a total of 5,374 patients with over 32,570 BMs. Most trials employed a 5 mm margin to define the HA zone. In trials reporting on BM incidence, 4.4 % (range 0 - 27 %) and 9.2 % (3 - 41 %) of patients had hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs, respectively. The most common risk factor for hippocampal BMs was the total number of BMs. The reported failure rate within the HA zone after HA-PCI or HA-WBRT was 4.5 % (0 - 13 %), salvageable with radiosurgery in most cases. SCLC histology was not associated with a higher risk of hippocampal failure (OR = 2.49; p = 0.23). In trials comparing with a conventional (non-HA) PCI or WBRT group, HA did not increase the hippocampal failure rate (OR = 1.90; p = 0.17).
CONCLUSION
The overall incidence of hippocampal and perihippocampal BMs is considerably low, with a subsequent low risk of local undertreatment following HA-PCI or HA-WBRT. In patients without involvement, the hippocampus should be spared to preserve neurocognitive function and quality of life.
PubMed: 38772476
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110331 -
Journal of Bone Oncology Jun 2024Skeletal metastases make up 17% of all metastases from advanced-stage melanoma. Bone metastases are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and decreased... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Skeletal metastases make up 17% of all metastases from advanced-stage melanoma. Bone metastases are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and decreased quality of life due to their association with skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia, radiotherapy, and surgery. The study aimed to determine the incidence of bone metastases and SREs in melanoma, identify possible risk factors for the development of bone metastases and SREs, and investigate survival rates in this patient population.
METHODS
A computer-based literature search was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to July 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) was utilized for quality assessment. Study characteristics, patient information, risk factors for developing bone metastases and SREs, and characteristics for survival were recorded.
RESULTS
We included 29 studies. The average bone metastasis-free interval ranged from four to 72 months. Incidence of bone metastases varied from 2 % to 49 % across 14 studies. 69 % (20/29) of studies described the location of bone metastases, with 24 % (7/29) focusing solely on spinal metastases. In one study, 129 SREs were recorded in 71 % (59/83) of the patient cohort, with various manifestations. The use of bone-directed agents was independently associated with lower risk of SREs. Survival after detection of bone metastasis ranged from three to 13 months. Factors associated with survival included clinical, tumor-related, and treatment features.
CONCLUSION
This review highlights the notable prevalence and risk factors of developing bone metastases and subsequent SREs in patients with melanoma. The surge in bone metastases poses a challenge in complication management, given the high prevalence of SREs. While this study offers a comprehensive overview of the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with bone metastases and SREs in melanoma patients that may guide patient and physician decision-making, a notable gap lies in the limited availability of high-quality data and the heterogeneous design of the existing literature. Future research should address predictive factors for bone metastases and SREs in melanoma to facilitate patient and physician decision-making and ultimately improve outcomes in this patient population.
PubMed: 38765703
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100603