-
Journal of Personalized Medicine Jun 2023Prostatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is the second most common malignancy in men globally. Signet-ring cell-like adenocarcinoma (SRCC) is a very rare PA subtype, with around... (Review)
Review
A Case of Prostatic Signet-Ring Cell-like Carcinoma with Pagetoid Spread and Intraductal Carcinoma and Long-Term Survival: PD-L1 and Mismatch Repair System Proteins (MMR) Immunohistochemical Evaluation with Systematic Literature Review.
Prostatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is the second most common malignancy in men globally. Signet-ring cell-like adenocarcinoma (SRCC) is a very rare PA subtype, with around 200 cases reported in the English literature. Histologically, the tumor cells show a vacuole compressing the nucleus to the periphery. Pagetoid spread in acini and ducts is usually related to metastases from urothelial or colorectal carcinomas, less commonly associated with intraductal carcinoma (IC); histologically, the tumor cells grow between the acinar secretory and basal cell layers. To our knowledge, we report the first prostatic SRCC (Gleason score 10, stage pT3b) associated with IC and pagetoid spread to prostatic acini and seminal vesicles. To our systematic literature review (PRISMA guidelines), it is the first tested case for both PD-L1 (<1% of positive tumor cells, clone 22C3) and mismatch repair system proteins (MMR) (MLH1+/MSH2+/PMS2+/MSH6+). We found no SRCC previously tested for MMR, while only four previous cases showed high expression of another PD-L1 clone (28-8). Finally, we discussed the differential diagnoses of prostatic SRCC.
PubMed: 37374005
DOI: 10.3390/jpm13061016 -
Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) Sep 2023With the recent success of immunotherapy, there is a growing interest in combining radiation with immunotherapy to boost abscopal response rates. Several challenges...
BACKGROUND
With the recent success of immunotherapy, there is a growing interest in combining radiation with immunotherapy to boost abscopal response rates. Several challenges exist in determining how to synergize these two modalities in the treatment of metastatic NSCLC.
METHODS
References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov databases with the search terms "abscopal", "radiation OR radiotherapy," "NSCLC", and "lung" on the index date of July 2022 from 2000-2022. This systematic review focuses primarily on clinical papers.
DISCUSSION
Early work combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy show promise in unlocking the abscopal effect. Preliminary evidence suggests that radiotherapy regimens with <5 fractions and smaller fields may be superior to regimens with 15 fractions and larger fields. There does not appear to be enough evidence to draw conclusions about the optimal timing of radiotherapy in relation to immunotherapy or the optimal anatomical location of radiation to induce the abscopal effect. Several studies suggest selecting patients with a higher absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) may help to further boost abscopal response rates. Furthermore, selecting tumors with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression, mismatch repair deficiency, and higher tumor mutational burden may similarly achieve this goal. Lastly, additional work is needed to minimize and predict for severe toxicity associated with combination therapy.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Immunotherapy; Lung; Combined Modality Therapy; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 37348427
DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2023.100914 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Systematic chemotherapy shows limited efficacy in patients with advanced disease, while targeted therapy and...
Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare and aggressive disease. Systematic chemotherapy shows limited efficacy in patients with advanced disease, while targeted therapy and immunotherapy may provide a reasonable alternative for specific populations. The molecular pattern of colorectal cancer (CRC) have recently been identified; this understanding has significantly influenced the clinical management of CRC in terms of molecular-targeted therapy. Although some genetic alterations have been associated with UrC, there is still no systematic overview of the molecular profile of this rare malignancy. In this review, we comprehensively discuss the molecular profile of UrC and further identify potential targets for the personalized treatment of UrC as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors that represent underlying biomarkers. A systematic literature search was carried out by searching the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to identify all literature related to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in urachal carcinoma from inception to February 2023. A total of 28 articles were eligible, and most studies included were case report sand retrospective case series. Furthermore, 420 cases of UrC were identified to analyze the association between mutations and UrC. The most commonly mutated gene in UrC was TP53 with the prevalence of 70%, followed by KRAS mutations in 28.3%, MYC mutations in 20.3%, SMAD4 mutations in 18.2% and GNAS mutations in 18%, amongst other genes. The molecular patterns of UrC and CRC are similar yet distinct. Notably, targeted therapy, especially EGFR-targeting therapy, might provide curative efficacy for patients with UrC by applying specific molecular markers. Additional potential biomarkers for the immunotherapy of UrC are mismatch repair (MMR) status and PD-L1 expression profile. In addition, combined regimens featuring targeted agents and immune checkpoint blockers might increase antitumor activity and exert better efficacy in UrC patients with specific mutational burden.
PubMed: 37324454
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1199395 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) are a tumor agnostic treatment. However, trials of their use have been site specific. Here we summarize the trial data and explore...
BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) are a tumor agnostic treatment. However, trials of their use have been site specific. Here we summarize the trial data and explore the utility of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression as a biomarker to direct their pan-cancer use.
METHOD
A systematic review of literature, following PRISMA guidelines, was performed. Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, NHS Health and Technology, and Web of Science were searched from their conception to June 2022 limited to the English language. The search terms and method were devised by a specialist medical librarian. Studies were limited to adults with solid cancers (excluding melanomas) treated with ICPIs. Only phase III randomized control trials (RCT) were included. The primary outcome was overall survival and secondary outcomes were progression free survival, PD-L1 expression, quality of life outcomes and adverse event data. Where present in eligible clinical trials, hazard ratios (HR), risk ratios (RR), standard error (SE) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted or calculated. Heterogeneity across studies was described with the use of an score (Low: 25, 50%: moderate, 75% low heterogeneity). HR pools inverse variance methods were adopted by Random Effects (RE). Means were standardized across any heterogenous scale limits.
RESULTS
In total 46,510 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, meta-analysis favored the use of ICPIs with an overall survival (OS) HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.78). Lung cancers showed the most benefit in OS [HR 0.72 (95% 0.66-0.78)] followed by head and neck cancers [HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.66-0.84)] and gastroesophageal junction cancers [HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.92)]. ICPIs seem to be efficacious at both primary presentation and recurrence [OS HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.77)] vs. [OS HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.87)] respectively. Interestingly, subgroup analysis comparing studies in which most cancers demonstrated PD-L1 expression vs. those studies in which a minority of cancer demonstrated PD-L1 expression reported similar effect of ICPI use on OS; oddly the data favored ICPI use in studies with a minority of PD-L1 expression. Specifically, studies with minority PD-L1 expression had an HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.68-0.78) vs. studies with majority PD-L1 expression HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.84). This was maintained even when studies exploring the same cancer site were directly compared. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing the impact on OS subdivided by the specific ICPI used. Where meta-analysis was performed, Nivolumab led to the greatest impact [HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.77)] with Avelumab failing to reach significance [HR 0.93 (95% CI 0.80-1.06)]. However, overall heterogenicity was high ( = 95%). Finally, the use of ICPIs led to an improved side effect profile when compared with standard chemotherapy [RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.73-0.98)].
CONCLUSION
ICPIs improve survival outcomes in all cancer types. These effects are seen in the primary, recurrent, chemotherapy sensitive, chemotherapy resistant disease. These data support their use as a tumor agnostic therapy. Furthermore, they are well tolerated. However, PD-L1 as a biomarker for the targeting of ICPI use seems problematic. Other biomarkers such as mismatch repair or tumor mutational burden should be explored in randomized trials. In addition, there are still limited trials looking at ICPI use outside of lung cancer.
PubMed: 37250628
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1192762 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) May 2023Enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung (lung-ETAC, former pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma, PEAC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which shares... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Enteric-type adenocarcinoma of the lung (lung-ETAC, former pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma, PEAC) is a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which shares morphological and immunohistochemical features with lung and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Few data are available on patient prognosis, possible prognostic factors and systemic approach to metastatic disease. We performed a pooled analysis and a systematic review of published lung-ETAC, along with an additional case description. Thirty-one eligible publications were identified, providing data from 126 patients. In the 127 patients overall analyzed, median overall survival (OS) was 56.0 (range 36.7-75.3) months in early-stage patients and 14.0 (range 4.5-23.5) months in those with advanced/metastatic disease. Median disease-free survival (DFS) after radical surgery was 24 (range 22.6-35.1) months. Smoking status (HR 4.304, 95% CI: 1.261-14.693, p = 0.020) and node involvement (HR 1.853, 95% CI: 1.179-2.911, p = 0.007) were the negative independent prognostic factors at multivariate analysis. As regards systemic therapies for advanced cases, no firm conclusions were drawn about the efficacy of lung cancer-oriented chemotherapy regimens as opposed to colon cancer-oriented ones. Molecular analysis of lung-ETAC revealed a relatively high mutational rate, with alterations in several druggable molecular pathways, KRAS and NRAS (31%) were the most frequently mutated oncogenes, followed by ROS1 (15%), RET (13%), BRAF (11%), EGFR (8%) and ALK (6%). Moreover, 3 (15%) out of 20 cases showed DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). In conclusion, advanced lung-ETAC patients appeared to have a better prognosis compared to other subtypes of NSCLC. Moreover, the mutational rate and microsatellite instability found in lung-ETACs suggest that a significant proportion of these patients could benefit from target therapies and immunotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Prognosis; Lung
PubMed: 37015149
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2023.107176 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Mar 2023The 12-gene recurrence score (RS) is a clinically validated assay which predicts recurrence risk in patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Decisions regarding adjuvant... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Impact of the 12-gene recurrence score in influencing adjuvant chemotherapy prescription in mismatch repair proficient stage II/III colonic carcinoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The 12-gene recurrence score (RS) is a clinically validated assay which predicts recurrence risk in patients with stage II/III colon cancer. Decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy may be guided using this assay or based on the judgement of tumour board.
AIMS
To assess the concordance between the RS and MDT decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method using the Review Manager version 5.4 software.
RESULTS
Four studies including 855 patients with a mean age of 68 years (range: 25-90 years) met inclusion criteria. Overall, 79.2% had stage II disease (677/855) and 20.8% had stage III disease (178/855). For the entire cohort, concordant results between the 12-gene assay and MDT were more likely than discordant (odds ratio (OR): 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.56, P < 0.001). Patients were more likely to have chemotherapy omitted than escalated when using the RS (OR: 9.76, 95% CI: 6.72-14.18, P < 0.001). For those with stage II disease, concordant results between the 12-gene assay and MDT were more likely than discordant (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.53, P < 0.001). In stage II disease, patients were more likely to have chemotherapy omitted than escalated when using the RS (OR: 7.39, 95% CI: 4.85-11.26, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The use of the 12-gene signature refutes the decision of tumour board in 25% of cases, with 75% of discordant decisions resulting in omission of adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, it is possible that a proportion of such patients are being overtreated when relying on tumour board decisions alone.
Topics: Humans; Aged; DNA Mismatch Repair; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Neoplasm Staging; Colonic Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Carcinoma
PubMed: 36912973
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04364-2 -
JAMA Network Open Feb 2023Although small intestinal adenocarcinomas (SIAs) are rare, they have a poor prognosis, and the optimal treatment strategies are largely unknown. Because of the lack of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Although small intestinal adenocarcinomas (SIAs) are rare, they have a poor prognosis, and the optimal treatment strategies are largely unknown. Because of the lack of high-quality evidence, guidelines for colorectal cancer are often followed in the treatment of SIAs.
OBJECTIVE
To review the current evidence regarding survival benefit of systemic therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted agents, and immunotherapy, for patients with SIAs.
DATA SOURCES
Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses, MEDLINE and Embase were searched for articles published from January 1, 2005, until June 1, 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
Retrospective cohort studies and prospective phase 2 or 3 trials describing survival after systemic therapies for patients with SIAs were eligible for inclusion. Assessment of study eligibility was blinded and performed by 3 reviewers.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The reviewers independently extracted data. Random effects, inverse variance, pairwise meta-analyses were performed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with SIAs after systemic therapies. Measures of interest included hazard ratios for survival and median survival times.
RESULTS
Overall, 57 retrospective cohort and phase 2 studies of 35 176 patients were included. Adjuvant chemotherapy, generally fluoropyrimidine-based, was associated with increased OS in stage I to III SIAs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53-0.68), especially in stage III tumors (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.64), irrespective of tumor localization. Palliative chemotherapy was also associated with an OS benefit (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40-0.58). Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin combinations were superior to other regimens (OS: HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99; PFS: HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30-0.71). Furthermore, bevacizumab added to chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone was associated with significantly prolonged PFS (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.43-0.89). Immunotherapy showed a 50% overall response rate in previously treated defective mismatch repair tumors.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, adjuvant and palliative chemotherapy were both associated with improved survival of patients with SIAs, especially fluoropyrimidine-based regimens and fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin combinations. Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy appears to prolong PFS and deserves further investigation. Immunotherapy seems beneficial and should be considered for patients with defective mismatch repair tumors. International collaborations should be undertaken to confirm and improve efficacy of systemic therapies for patients with SIAs.
Topics: Humans; Bevacizumab; Retrospective Studies; Oxaliplatin; Prospective Studies; Adenocarcinoma
PubMed: 36826817
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0631 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2023Immunotherapy has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Immunotherapy has been approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for the treatment of non-metastatic colorectal cancer remains unclear. We tried to explore clinical effect of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of non-metastatic colorectal cancer.
METHODS
We searched the databases (PubMed, Wanfang Embase, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases) to obtain suitable articles up to September 2022. The primary outcomes of pathological complete response (pCRs), major pathological response (MPR), objective response rate (ORR), R0-resection and anus preserving rate were collected and evaluated. Secordary outcomes (pCRs and MPR) of subgroup analysis between deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high group (dMMR/MSI-H) and proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable group (pMMR/MSS) and outcomes for rectal cancer were analyzed for the final results.
RESULTS
We included ten articles and 410 cases of non-metastatic colorectal cancer with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. There were 113 (27.5%) cases with the dMMR/MSI-H status and 167 (40.7%) cases with the pMMR/MSS status. pCRs was found in 167/373 (44.6%) patients (ES: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.62, <0.01, chi = 65.3, <0.01, = 86.2%) and MPR was found in 194/304 (63.8%) patients (ES: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.78, <0.01, chi = 42.55, <0.01, = 81.2%) with the random-effects model and huge heterogeneity. In the subgroup analysis, pCRs was higher in the dMMR/MSI-H group than the pMMR/MSS group in the fixed-effects model with minimal heterogeneity (OR: 3.55, 95% CI: 1.74 to 7.27, <0.01, chi = 1.86, =0.6, = 0%). pCRs was found in 58/172 (33.9%) rectal cancer patients (ES: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.40, <0.01, chi = 3.04, =0.55, = 0%) with the fixed-effects model and little heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could increase pCRs and MPR rate for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could achieve better pCRs rate in dMMR/MSI-H group than in the pMMR/MSS group. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy could be another treatment option for non-metastatic colorectal cancer.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#myprospero, identifier CRD42022350523.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Colonic Neoplasms; Immunotherapy; Rectal Neoplasms; Microsatellite Instability
PubMed: 36776899
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1044353 -
HGG Advances Jan 2023To identify Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is performed on colorectal cancers (CRCs). Upon subsequent LS diagnostics,...
To identify Lynch syndrome (LS) carriers, DNA mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is performed on colorectal cancers (CRCs). Upon subsequent LS diagnostics, MMR deficiency (MMRd) sometimes remains unexplained (UMMRd). Recently, the importance of complete LS diagnostics to explain UMMRd, involving MMR methylation, germline, and somatic analyses, was stressed. To explore why some MMRd CRCs remain unsolved, we performed a systematic review of the literature and mapped patients with UMMRd diagnosed in our center. A systematic literature search was performed in Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for articles on UMMRd CRCs after complete LS diagnostics published until December 15, 2021. Additionally, UMMRd CRCs diagnosed in our center since 1993 were mapped. Of 754 identified articles, 17 were included, covering 74 patients with UMMRd. Five CRCs were microsatellite stable. Upon complete diagnostics, 39 patients had single somatic MMR hits, and six an MMR germline variant of unknown significance (VUS). Ten had somatic pathogenic variants (PVs) in , , , and . The remaining 14 patients were the only identifiable cases in the literature without a plausible identified cause of the UMMRd. Of those, nine were suspected to have LS. In our center, complete LS diagnostics in approximately 5,000 CRCs left seven MMRd CRCs unexplained. All had a somatic MMR hit or MMR germline VUS, indicative of a missed second MMR hit. In vitually all patients with UMMRd, complete LS diagnostics suggest MMR gene involvement. Optimizing detection of currently undetectable PVs and VUS interpretation might explain all UMMRd CRCs, considering UMMRd a case closed.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary; Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis; Brain Neoplasms
PubMed: 36624813
DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2022.100167 -
Scientific Reports Nov 2022Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in the USA for tumours exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved in the USA for tumours exhibiting mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), microsatellite instability (MSI), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB), with regulatory and reimbursement applications in multiple other countries underway. As the estimated budget impacts of future reimbursements depend on the size of the potential target population, we performed a scoping review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of these pan-tumour biomarkers in different cancers. We systematically searched Medline/Embase and included studies reporting the prevalence of dMMR/MSI/high TMB in solid tumours published 01/01/2018-31/01/2021. Meta-analyses were performed separately for the pan-cancer prevalence of each biomarker, and by cancer type and stage where possible. The searches identified 3890 papers, with 433 prevalence estimates for 32 different cancer types from 201 studies included in meta-analyses. The pooled overall prevalence of dMMR, MSI and high TMB (≥ 10 mutations/Mb) in pan-cancer studies was 2.9%, 2.7% and 14.0%, respectively. The prevalence profiles of dMMR/MSI and high TMB differed across cancer types. For example, endometrial, colorectal, small bowel and gastric cancers showed high prevalence of both dMMR and MSI (range: 8.7-26.8% and 8.5-21.9%, respectively) and high TMB (range: 8.5-43.0%), while cervical, esophageal, bladder/urothelial, lung and skin cancers showed low prevalence of dMMR and MSI (< 5%), but high prevalence of high TMB (range: 23.7-52.6%). For other cancer types, prevalence of all three biomarkers was generally low (< 5%). This structured review of dMMR/MSI/high TMB prevalence across cancers and for specific cancer types and stages provide timely evidence to inform budget impact forecasts in health technology assessments for drug approvals based on these pan-tumour biomarkers.
Topics: Humans; Microsatellite Instability; Biomarkers, Tumor; Prevalence; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 36443366
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23319-1