-
American Journal of Transplantation :... Oct 2012Liver transplant recipients are at high risk of developing acute and chronic renal failure. Moreover, introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score... (Review)
Review
Liver transplant recipients are at high risk of developing acute and chronic renal failure. Moreover, introduction of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score for primary allocation of liver grafts favors patients with pretransplant kidney dysfunction, which in turn have a higher risk of posttransplant renal failure. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) further increase the risk of renal failure and therefore sparing CNI with the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may improve renal function. MMF may either be used de novo in the immediate posttransplant period in combination with low-dose CNI (scenario 1) or patients that receive immunosuppression based on CNI may be converted to MMF in combination with minimization or elimination of CNI (scenario 2). Although many retrospective cohort studies and nonrandomized trials have implicated efficacy of this approach the evidence from randomized controlled studies has not been summarized. In the current review we report the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Topics: Calcineurin Inhibitors; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Liver Transplantation; Mycophenolic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 22813081
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04157.x -
Journal of the American Academy of... May 2011A range of interventions has been described for the treatment of pemphigus; however, the optimal therapeutic strategy has not been established. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A range of interventions has been described for the treatment of pemphigus; however, the optimal therapeutic strategy has not been established.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus.
METHODS
We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the methodology of the Cochrane Collaboration. We selected randomized controlled trials including participants with the diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceus confirmed with clinical, histopathological, and immunofluorescence criteria. All interventions were considered. Primary outcomes studied were remission and mortality. Secondary outcomes included disease control, relapse, pemphigus severity score, time to disease control, cumulative glucocorticoid dose, serum antibody titers, adverse events, and quality of life.
RESULTS
Eleven studies with a total of 404 participants were identified. Interventions assessed included prednisolone dose regimen, pulsed dexamethasone, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, dapsone, mycophenolate, plasma exchange, topical epidermal growth factor, and traditional Chinese medicine. We found some interventions to be superior for certain outcomes, although we were unable to conclude which treatments are superior overall.
LIMITATIONS
Many interventions for pemphigus have not been evaluated in controlled trials. All studies were insufficiently powered to establish definitive results.
CONCLUSIONS
There is inadequate evidence available at present to ascertain the optimal therapy for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Further randomized controlled trials are required.
Topics: Azathioprine; Cyclophosphamide; Epidermal Growth Factor; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Pemphigus; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21353333
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.04.039 -
Medicine Jul 2010We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare complete remission and adverse events (that is, infection, leukopenia, and... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare complete remission and adverse events (that is, infection, leukopenia, and gastrointestinal [GI] symptoms) between mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN). We identified trials from MEDLINE using the PubMed and Ovid search engines, and from The Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials comparing MMF with CYC with 1 of following outcomes: complete remission, complete/partial remission, infection, leukopenia, GI symptoms, serum creatinine, 24-hour urine protein, and urine albumin. Data were independently extracted by 2 reviewers. Five trials with a total of 638 patients were eligible for review. While the MMF group tended to achieve complete remission more frequently than the CYC group, this was not significant (pooled risk ratio [RR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-2.93). Pooling based on the 4 homogeneous trials yielded similar results-that is, no benefit of MMF compared with CYC groups (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.74-1.77). The complete or partial remission rates were also not different (pooled RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.97-1.48) among the groups. The adverse events (infection, renal function, and GI symptoms) were not significantly different, except for leukopenia, which was lower in the MMF group. In summary, patients treated with MMF and CYC had similar remission rates, but the MMF group had less frequent leukopenia than the CYC group. Further large-scale trials are needed to confirm these results.
Topics: Cyclophosphamide; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Nephritis; Mycophenolic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 20616662
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181e93d00 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2009Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) are related conditions with similar clinical features of variable severity. Survival of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) are related conditions with similar clinical features of variable severity. Survival of patients with HUS and TTP has improved greatly over the past two decades with improved supportive care for patients with HUS and by the use of plasma exchange (PE) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for patients with TTP. Separate pathogenesis of these two disorders has become more evident, but management overlaps.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions for HUS and TTP separately, in patients of all ages.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), conference proceedings, reference lists of articles and text books and contact with investigators were used to identify relevant studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any interventions for HUS or TTP in patients of all ages.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three authors independently extracted data and evaluated study reporting quality using standard Cochrane criteria. Analysis was undertaken using a random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
MAIN RESULTS
For TTP, we found six RCTs (331 participants) evaluating PE with FFP as the control. Interventions tested included antiplatelet therapy (APT) plus PE with FFP, FFP transfusion and PE with cryosupernatant plasma (CSP). Two studies compared plasma infusion (PI) to PE with FFP and showed a significant increase in failure of remission at two weeks (RR 1.48, 95% 1.12 to 1.96) and all-cause mortality (RR 1.91, 95% 1.09 to 3.33) in the PI group. Seven RCTs were undertaken in children with HUS. None of the assessed interventions used (FFP transfusion, heparin with or without urokinase or dipyridamole, shiga toxin binding protein and steroids) were superior to supportive therapy alone, for all-cause mortality, neurological/extrarenal events, renal biopsy changes, proteinuria or hypertension at the last follow-up visit. Bleeding was significantly higher in those receiving anticoagulation therapy compared to supportive therapy alone (RR 25.89, 95% CI 3.67 to 182.83).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
PE with FFP is still the most effective treatment available for TTP. For patients with HUS, supportive therapy including dialysis is still the most effective treatment. All studies in HUS have been conducted in the diarrhoeal form of the disease. There were no RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of any interventions on patients with atypical HUS who have a more chronic and relapsing course.
Topics: Cyclophosphamide; Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Plasma Exchange; Purpura, Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 19160220
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003595.pub2 -
Singapore Medical Journal Oct 2008The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in IgA nephropathy (IgAN).
METHODS
A search through Cochrane Library, EMBASE and PubMed was carried out. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), which compared MMF with conventional treatments, were identified. Patients' baseline, treatment strategies and study end-points were compared.
RESULTS
Four RCTs (168 patients) were selected. All patients had histologically-confirmed IgAN and proteinuria greater than 1 g/day. The follow-up duration ranged from 1.5 to 3.0 years. MMF was used at a titrated dose of 1-2 g/day. In the two trials with subjects having moderate to high risk for progressive disease, MMF did not demonstrate any significant difference in retarding the decline in renal function and proteinuria reduction. One trial concluded that there was a trend towards worse outcomes when MMF was used in moderately-advanced disease. Only one trial involving subjects with less advanced disease (reflected by a favourable histological grade) showed a significant decrease in proteinuria in the MMF-treated group. No serious adverse events occurred in all the four trials using MMF.
CONCLUSION
No benefit was seen in moderately-advanced IgAN treated with MMF. In a selected group of patients with less advanced disease, MMF was effective in proteinuria reduction. Larger randomised studies are needed to confirm or reject these results.
Topics: Creatinine; Glomerulonephritis, IGA; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Mycophenolic Acid; Placebos; Proteinuria; Quality Control; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 18946610
DOI: No ID Found -
Nefrologia : Publicacion Oficial de La... 2008We reviewed the literature in 2007 on 3 groups of systemic diseases affecting the kidney: lupic nephropathy (LN), small vessel vasculitis (SVV) and renal amyloidosis. A... (Review)
Review
We reviewed the literature in 2007 on 3 groups of systemic diseases affecting the kidney: lupic nephropathy (LN), small vessel vasculitis (SVV) and renal amyloidosis. A systematic review of 268 patients with LN pooled from 4 studies found that mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the induction phase caused more remissions and achieved greater renal survival than cyclophosphamide (CP), confirming it as a valid alternative to CP. Using a protocol including rituximab and MPA in the induction phase (14 days), MPA alone without corticoids is effective and safe in the maintenance phase. Rituximab has also been successfully used in CP-resistant forms of LN, where it reduces clinical activity and mesangial proliferation. Plasma exchanges achieve better results than bolus corticoids in SVS with severe renal failure. Complications are severe. Anti- TNF-alpha agents provide no benefit in this indication. Prolonged administration of low-dose corticoids reduces the incidence of relapses. MPA is an alternative to CP if this drug cannot be administered. Good results are achieved with rituximab in CP-resistant forms. According to a controlled trial, treatment of AL amyloidosis with dexamethasone and melphalan has equivalent results to highdose melphalan and rescue with hematopoietic stem cell transplant. In AA amyloidosis, eprosidate slows the rate of progression of renal failure.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Amyloidosis; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Combined Modality Therapy; Cyclophosphamide; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppression Therapy; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Diseases; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Lupus Nephritis; Melphalan; Mycophenolic Acid; Plasma Exchange; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Rituximab; Vasculitis
PubMed: 18847427
DOI: No ID Found -
Arthritis Research & Therapy 2006Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressant drug being used for induction and maintenance of remission of lupus nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressant drug being used for induction and maintenance of remission of lupus nephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Evidence about its use was sought from full publications and abstracts of randomised trials and cohort studies by using a variety of search strategies. Efficacy and adverse event outcomes were sought. Five randomised trials enrolled patients with World Health Organization (WHO) class III, IV, or V (mostly IV) lupus nephritis, predominantly comparing MMF (1 to 3 g daily) with cyclophosphamide and steroid. Complete response and complete or partial response was significantly more frequent with MMF than with cyclophosphamide, with numbers needed to treat of 8 (95% confidence interval 4.3 to 60) to induce one additional complete or partial response, with wide confidence intervals. Death was reported less frequently with MMF (0.7%, 1 death in 152 patients) than with cyclophosphamide (7.8%, 12 deaths in 154 patients), with a number needed to treat to prevent (NNTp) one death of 14 (8 to 48). Hospital admission was also lower with MMF (1.7% versus 15%; NNTp 7.4 [4.8 to 16]). Serious infections, leucopaenia, amenorrhoea, and hair loss were all significantly less frequent with MMF than with cyclophosphamide, but diarrhoea was significantly more common with MMF. Ten of 18 cohort studies enrolled only patients with lupus nephritis (author-defined or WHO class III to V). Seven of these 10 reported that complete or partial response with MMF (mostly 1 or 2 g daily) with steroid occurred in 121/151 (80%) and that treatment failure or no response occurred in 30/151 (20%). Adverse events were generally similar in cohort studies with and without only patients with lupus nephritis. In all 18 cohorts, gastrointestinal adverse events (diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting) occurred in 30%, infection in 23%, and serious infection in 4.3%. Adverse event discontinuations occurred in 14% and lack of efficacy occurred in 10%. There was a single death with MMF, a mortality rate over the course of 1 year of approximately 0.2%. The results form a basis on which to plan future studies and provide a guide for the use of MMF in lupus nephritis until results of larger studies are available. At least one such study is under way.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Nephritis; Mycophenolic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 17163990
DOI: 10.1186/ar2093 -
Health Technology Assessment... May 2005To examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the newer immunosuppressive drugs for renal transplantation: basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
To examine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the newer immunosuppressive drugs for renal transplantation: basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate (mofetil and sodium) and sirolimus.
DATA SOURCES
Electronic databases. Industry submissions. Current Clinical Trials register. Cochrane Collaboration Renal Disease Group.
REVIEW METHODS
The review followed the InterTASC standards. Each of the five company submissions to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) contained cost-effectiveness models, which were evaluated by using a critique covering (1) model checking, (2) a detailed model description and (3) model rerunning.
RESULTS
For induction therapy, three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) found that daclizumab significantly reduced the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection and patient survival at 6 months/1 year compared with placebo, but not compared with the monoclonal antibody OKT3. There was no significant gain in patient survival or graft loss at 3 years. The incidence of side-effects with daclizumab reduced compared to OKT3. Eight RCTs found that basiliximab significantly improved 6-month/1-year biopsy-confirmed acute rejection compared to placebo, but not compared to either ATG or OKT3. There was no significant gain in either 1-year patient survival or graft loss. The incidence of side-effects with basiliximab was not significantly different compared to OKT3/ATG. For initial/maintenance therapy, 13 RCTs found that tacrolimus reduced the 6-month/1-year incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection compared to ciclosporin. There was no significant improvement in either 1-year or long-term (up to 5 years) graft loss or patient survival. The acute rejection benefit of tacrolimus over ciclosporin appeared to be equivalent for Sandimmun and Neoral. There were important differences in the side-effect profile of tacrolimus and ciclosporin. Seven RCTs found that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) reduced the incidence of acute rejection. There was no significant difference in patient survival or graft loss at 1-year or 3-year follow-up. There appeared to be differences in the side-effect profiles of MMF and azathioprine (AZA). No RCTs comparing MMF with AZA were identified. One RCT compared mycophenolate sodium (MPS) to MMF and reported no difference between the two drugs in 1-year acute rejection rate, graft survival, patient survival or side-effect profile. Two RCTs suggest that addition of sirolimus to a ciclosporin-based initial/maintenance therapy reduces 1-year acute rejections in comparison to a ciclosporin (Neoral) dual therapy alone and substituting azathioprine with sirolimus in initial/maintenance therapy reduces the incidence of acute rejection. Graft and patient survival were not significantly different with either sirolimus regimen. Adding sirolimus increases the incidence of side-effects. The side-effect profiles of azathioprine and sirolimus appear to be different. For the treatment of acute rejection, three RCTs suggested that both tacrolimus and MMF reduce the incidence of subsequent acute rejection and the need for additional drug therapy. Only one RCT and one subgroup analysis in children (<18 years) were identified comparing ciclosporin to tacrolimus and sirolimus, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The newer immunosuppressant drugs (basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus and MMF) consistently reduced the incidence of short-term (1-year) acute rejection compared with conventional immunosuppressive therapy. The independent use of basiliximab, daclizumab, tacrolimus and MMF was associated with a similar absolute reduction in 1-year acute rejection rate (approximately 15%). However, the effects of these drugs did not appear to be additive (e.g. benefit of tacrolimus with adjuvant MMF was 5% reduction in acute rejection rate compared with 15% reduction with adjuvant AZA). Thus, the addition of one of these drugs to a baseline immunosuppressant regimen was likely to affect adversely the incremental cost-effectiveness of the addition of another. The trials did not assess how the improvement in short-term outcomes (e.g. acute rejection rate or measures of graft function), together with the side-effect profile associated with each drug, translated into changes in patient-related quality of life. Moreover, given the relatively short duration of trials, the impact of the newer immunosuppressants on long-term graft loss and patient survival remains uncertain. The absence of both long-term outcome and quality of life from trial data makes assessment of the clinical and cost-effectiveness on the newer immunosuppressants contingent on modelling based on extrapolations from short-term trial outcomes. The choice of the most appropriate short-term outcome (e.g. acute rejection rate or measures of graft function) for such modelling remains a matter of clinical and scientific debate. The decision to use acute rejection in the meta-model in this report was based on the findings of a systematic review of the literature of predictors of long-term graft outcome. Only a very small proportion of the RCTs identified in this review assessed patient-focused outcomes such as quality of life. Since immunosuppressive drugs have both clinical benefits and specific side-effects, the balance of these harms and benefits could best be quantified through future trials using quality of life measures. The design of future trials should be considered with a view to the impact of drugs on particular renal transplant groups, particularly higher risk individuals and children. Finally, there is a need for improved reporting of methodological details of future trials, such as the method of randomisation and allocation concealment. A number of issues exist around registry data, for example the use of multiple drug regimens and the need to assess the long-term outcomes. An option is the use of observational registry data including, if possible, prospective data on all consecutive UK renal transplant patients. Data capture for each patient should include immunosuppressant regimens, clinical and patient-related outcomes and patient demographics.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Basiliximab; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Daclizumab; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Models, Econometric; Mycophenolic Acid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sirolimus; Survival Analysis; Tacrolimus
PubMed: 15899149
DOI: 10.3310/hta9210