-
JAMA Network Open Oct 2019Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are increasingly being identified in women of childbearing potential. Pregnancy in women with MPNs is associated with maternal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are increasingly being identified in women of childbearing potential. Pregnancy in women with MPNs is associated with maternal thrombosis, hemorrhage, and placental dysfunction leading to fetal growth restriction or loss.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the association between the use of aspirin, heparin, interferon, or combinations and live birth rate and adverse maternal outcomes in pregnant women with MPNs.
DATA SOURCES
Systematic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print and In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations from inception to July 19, 2018, with no language restrictions, was conducted. Key search terms included myeloproliferative disorders, polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis.
STUDY SELECTION
A study was eligible if it included pregnant patients with MPNs; interventions included aspirin, heparin, and/or interferon; there was a comparison group in which patients did not receive the intervention; the study reported on at least 1 of the study outcomes; and it was a randomized, case-control, or cohort study or series of at least 10 pregnancies. Data were extracted in duplicate; 0.5% of identified studies met selection criteria.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and reported in accordance with Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Data were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel approach.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Outcomes were the number of live births and maternal complications, specifically, arterial or venous thrombosis, hemorrhage, and preeclampsia.
RESULTS
Twenty-two studies reporting on 1210 pregnancies were included. The live birth rate was 71.3% (95% CI, 65.1%-77.6%). Use of aspirin (11 studies, 227 patients; unadjusted odds ratio, 8.6; 95% CI, 4.0-18.1) and interferon (6 studies, 90 patients; unadjusted odds ratio, 9.7; 95% CI, 2.3-41.0) were associated with higher odds of live birth. Addition of heparin to aspirin was not associated with higher odds of live birth (6 studies, 96 patients; unadjusted odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.5-9.0). The most common adverse maternal event was preeclampsia, with an incidence of 3.1% (95% CI, 1.7%-4.5%).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Most studies reported on pregnancy with essential thrombocythemia. Few studies reported on pregnancy with polycythemia vera and none with myelofibrosis met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective and early pregnancy losses may have been underreported. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that aspirin or interferon is associated with higher odds of live birth in pregnant women with MPN.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Aspirin; Birth Rate; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin; Humans; Interferons; Live Birth; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Neoplasms; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Pregnancy Outcome
PubMed: 31584685
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12666 -
BMC Cancer Jun 2019Research into Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms is heterogeneous. In addition, no systematization of studies of polycythemia vera (PV),... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematization of analytical studies of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and primary myelofibrosis, and a meta-analysis of the frequency of JAK2, CALR and MPL mutations: 2000-2018.
BACKGROUND
Research into Philadelphia-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms is heterogeneous. In addition, no systematization of studies of polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) or primary myelofibrosis (PMF) have been carried out. The objective of this review is to characterize studies on BCR-ABL1-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms and to compare the frequency of JAK2, MPL and CALR mutations in PV, ET and PMF.
METHOD
A systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted, as was meta-analysis with an ex-ante selection of protocol, according to phases of the PRISMA guide in three interdisciplinary databases. To guarantee reproducibility in the pursuit and retrieval of information, the reproducibility and methodological quality of the studies were evaluated by two researchers.
RESULTS
Fifty-two studies were included, the majority having been carried out in the United States, China, Brazil and Europe. The frequency of the JAK2V617F mutation ranged from 46.7 to 100% in patients with PV, from 31.3 to 72.1% in patients with ET, and from 25.0 to 85.7% in those with PMF. The frequency of the MPL mutation was 0% in PV, from 0.9 to 12.5% in ET, and from 0 to 17.1% in PMF. The CALR mutation occurred at a frequency of 0.0% in PV, whereas in ET, it ranged from 12.6 to 50%, and in PMF, it ranged from 10 to 100%. The risk of this mutation presenting in PV is 3.0 times that found for ET and 4.0 times that found for PMF.
CONCLUSION
Given the specificity and reported high frequencies of the JAK2V617F, MPL and CALR mutations in this group of neoplasms, the diagnosis of these diseases should not be made on clinical and hematological characteristics alone but should include genetic screening of patients.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Calreticulin; Genetic Heterogeneity; Genetic Testing; Humans; Janus Kinase 2; Mutation Rate; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Receptors, Thrombopoietin; Reproducibility of Results; Thrombocythemia, Essential
PubMed: 31208359
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5764-4 -
Blood Advances Jun 2019In the last years, a growing amount of evidence has been produced regarding the role of leukocytosis as a risk factor for thrombosis in patients with myeloproliferative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
In the last years, a growing amount of evidence has been produced regarding the role of leukocytosis as a risk factor for thrombosis in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, predominantly in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). Results from epidemiologic studies on this issue, however, are inconclusive. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles published in the last 12 years addressing the issue, according to a predefined protocol. Forty-one articles analyzing >30 000 patients met our inclusion criteria and were deemed of acceptable methodologic quality. In addition to data on thrombosis, data were collected on bleeding, hematologic evolution, secondary cancer, and death. The relative risk (RR) of thrombosis in the presence of leukocytosis was 1.59 (95% CI, 1.40-1.80), mainly accounted for by ET (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.43-1.91) and arterial thrombosis (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.13-1.86) subgroups; the effect was not significant in venous thrombosis alone. Sensitivity analyses considering recurrent events as well as white blood cell estimates adjusted or unadjusted for confounding factors confirmed the primary results. In addition, the pooled RR of studies that tested white blood cell counts in time-dependent models suggested a causative effect of leukocytes in the mechanism that triggers thrombosis. The effect of leukocytosis on bleeding (RR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.26-2.77) and death (RR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.59-2.23) was confirmed, whereas conclusions on hematologic evolutions and solid tumors were uncertain. To confirm the accuracy of these results, an investigation on individual patient data in a large collective archive of homogeneous patients is warranted.
Topics: Female; Hemorrhage; Humans; Leukocytosis; Male; Polycythemia Vera; Risk Factors; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombosis
PubMed: 31175128
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000211 -
Haematologica Dec 2019Hydroxyurea is the standard treatment in high-risk patients with polycythemia vera. However, estimates of its effect in terms of clinical outcomes (thrombosis, bleeding,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Hydroxyurea is the standard treatment in high-risk patients with polycythemia vera. However, estimates of its effect in terms of clinical outcomes (thrombosis, bleeding, hematologic transformations and mortality) are lacking. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the absolute risk of events in recent cases of patients under hydroxyurea treatment. We searched for relevant articles or abstracts in the following databases: Medline, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry, LILACS. Sixteen studies published from 2008 to 2018 reporting number of events using World Health Organization diagnosis for polycythemia vera were selected. Through a random effect logistic model, incidences, study heterogeneity and confounder effects were estimated for each outcome at different follow ups. Overall, 3,236 patients were analyzed. While incidences of thrombosis and acute myeloid leukemia were stable over time, mortality and myelofibrosis varied depending on follow-up duration. Thrombosis rates were 1.9%, 3.6% and 6.8% persons/year at median ages 60, 70 and 80 years, respectively. Higher incidence of arterial events was predicted by previous cardiovascular complication. Leukemic transformation incidence was 0.4% persons/year. Incidence of transformation to myelofibrosis and mortality were significantly dependent on age and follow-up duration. For myelofibrosis, rates were 5.0 at five years and 33.7% at ten years; overall mortality was 12.6% and 56.2% at five and ten years, respectively. In conclusion, we provide reliable risk estimates for the main outcomes in polycythemia vera patients under hydroxyurea treatment. These findings can help design comparative clinical trials with new cytoreductive drugs and prove the feasibility of using critical end points for efficacy, such as major thrombosis.
Topics: Hemorrhage; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Rate; Thrombosis
PubMed: 31123026
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2019.221234 -
Haematologica Apr 2019Advances in understanding the pathogenesis and molecular landscape of myelofibrosis have occurred over the last decade. Treating physicians now have access to an...
Advances in understanding the pathogenesis and molecular landscape of myelofibrosis have occurred over the last decade. Treating physicians now have access to an ever-evolving armamentarium of novel agents to treat patients, although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative approach. Improvements in donor selection, conditioning regimens, disease monitoring and supportive care have led to augmented survival after transplantation. Nowadays, there are comprehensive guidelines concerning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with myelofibrosis. However, it commonly remains difficult for both physicians and patients alike to weigh up the risk-benefit ratio of transplantation given the inherent heterogeneity regarding both clinical course and therapeutic response. In this timely review, we provide an up-to-date synopsis of current transplantation recommendations, discuss usage of JAK inhibitors before and after transplantation, examine donor selection and compare conditioning platforms. Moreover, we discuss emerging data concerning the impact of the myelofibrosis mutational landscape on transplantation outcome, peritransplant management of splenomegaly, poor graft function and prevention/management of relapse.
Topics: Disease-Free Survival; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Primary Myelofibrosis; Recurrence; Survival Rate; Transplantation Conditioning; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 30872371
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.206151 -
Romanian Journal of Internal Medicine =... Jun 2019In the last years an uprising interest for a relatively unknown entity, eosinophilic ascites (EA), has been recorded. Our aim is to investigate the potential causes of...
BACKGROUND
In the last years an uprising interest for a relatively unknown entity, eosinophilic ascites (EA), has been recorded. Our aim is to investigate the potential causes of EA development, as well as clinical, laboratory, endoscopic and radiologic features, management and outcome in these patients.
METHODS
The following research was performed on PubMed (MEDLINE) database using the medical subject headings [Mesh] terms "Ascites" AND "Eosinophils".
RESULTS
A total of 284 results, dating from 1962 onwards, were found and abstracts were examined. 131 papers were excluded and the remaining 153 publications, consisting in case reports and series of cases, were analyzed. From 171 patients with EA, 127 subjects (74%) had EGE, 17 (10%) parasitic and fungal infections, 11(7%) Hypereosinophilic syndrome and 16 patients (9%) less common diseases (eosinophilic pancreatitis, chronic eosinophilic leukemia, myelofibrosis, T-cell lymphoma, Churg Strauss Syndrome, Systemic lupus erythematosus, Familial paroxysmal polyserositis and Ménétrier's disease). High eosinophil blood count and IgE levels as well as gastrointestinal symptoms are frequent. The diagnosis is based on ascitic fluid analysis, imaging and endoscopic biopsies. Therapy with corticosteroids results in resolution of eosinophilic ascites in almost all patients.
CONCLUSION
In most cases, in the absence of allergy, parasitic infections, malignancy, hematological disorders, peritoneal tuberculosis, inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune disease, EA develops as a manifestation of eosinophilic gastroenteritis.
Topics: Ascites; Eosinophilia; Humans
PubMed: 30864403
DOI: 10.2478/rjim-2018-0041 -
BMC Cancer Feb 2019Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell clonal diseases. Most patients with MPN... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem cell clonal diseases. Most patients with MPN are asymptomatic at diagnosis although some of them suffer from constitutional symptoms. Thrombosis and bleeding can also be one of the initial manifestations although the reported prevalence varied considerably across the studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted with the aims to better understand the prevalence and characteristics of thrombosis and bleeding among patients with newly-diagnosed MPN.
METHODS
Using a search strategy that included the terms for myeloproliferative neoplasms, thrombosis, and bleeding, two investigators independently searched for published articles indexed in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to August 2018. The pooled prevalence was calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model with a double arcsine transformation.
RESULTS
A total of 29 cohort studies (8 prospective and 21 retrospective) with 13,436 patients with MPN were included into this meta-analysis. At diagnosis, the pooled prevalence of overall thrombosis among patients with MPN was 20.0% (95% CI, 16.6-23.8%; I 96%), with the pooled prevalence of arterial thrombosis of 16.2% (95% CI, 13.0-20.0%; I 95%) and the pooled prevalence of venous thrombosis of 6.2% (95% CI, 4.9-7.8%; I 89%). Common thrombotic events included cerebrovascular disease/transient ischemic attack, coronary heart disease, and deep venous thrombosis. The pooled prevalence of hemorrhagic complications among patients who were newly diagnosed with MPN patients was 6.2% (95% CI, 5.0-7.8%; I 85%). Common sites of bleeding included gastrointestinal, mucosal, and cutaneous bleeding.
CONCLUSIONS
Thrombosis and bleeding are common initial manifestations of MPN. Investigations for MPN should be considered for patients who present with unexplained thrombosis or abnormal bleeding.
Topics: Hemorrhage; Humans; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Philadelphia Chromosome; Prevalence; Thrombosis
PubMed: 30819138
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5387-9 -
Haematologica Aug 2019Although it is well known that myeloproliferative neoplasms occur in younger patients, few large cohorts of such patients have been reported. Thus, our knowledge about...
Although it is well known that myeloproliferative neoplasms occur in younger patients, few large cohorts of such patients have been reported. Thus, our knowledge about circumstances of diagnosis, outcome and treatment is limited, especially for children and young adults. We therefore performed a systematic review of cases, published since 2005, concerning patients aged below 20 years at the time of diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia or polycythemia vera. We identified 396 cases of essential thrombocythemia and 75 of polycythemia vera. The median age at diagnosis was 9.3 and 12 years, respectively, and females constituted 57.6% and 45% of the groups, respectively. Half of the patients were asymptomatic at diagnosis. The proportion of so-called triple negativity was high: 57% in essential thrombocythemia and 73% in polycythemia vera. The incidence of thrombosis during the follow-up was 9.3% in patients with polycythemia vera and less, 3.8%, in those with essential thrombocythemia. Venous events were predominant (84.2%), with hemorrhagic episodes being rarer (<5%). The risk of evolution also seemed low (2% to myelofibrosis and no reports of acute leukemia), but the median follow-up was only 50 months. Survival curves were not available. Half of the patients received an antithrombotic drug and 40.5% received a cytoreductive drug. All data should be analyzed with care because of the proportion of missing data (10.7% to 74.7%). This review highlights interesting points concerning this population of young patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, including that such patients were identified as negative for all common driver mutations, but also shows the need for larger contemporary cohorts with longer follow-up to assess the true prognosis of these patients.
Topics: Adolescent; Asymptomatic Diseases; Child; Cytotoxins; Early Diagnosis; Fibrinolytic Agents; Gene Expression; Hemorrhage; Humans; Janus Kinase 1; Janus Kinase 2; Mutation; Polycythemia Vera; Prognosis; Splenomegaly; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombosis; Young Adult
PubMed: 30679326
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.200832 -
American Journal of Hematology May 2018Patients with a Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) may harbor or develop lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD), however, the clinical and molecular determinants...
Patients with a Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) may harbor or develop lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD), however, the clinical and molecular determinants of MPN and LPD co-occurrence are still uncertain. To systematically pool the available knowledge, we conducted a scoping review of literature published since January 2005 and analyzed single-patient clinical data from 50 papers reporting 214 individuals harboring both MPN and LPD. Patients had been diagnosed essential thrombocythemia (44%), polycythemia vera (29%), or myelofibrosis (23%) at a median age of 67 years (26-94): half of them incurred a LPD after a median of 72 months from MPN diagnosis, while in 20% the LPD diagnosis was antecedent or synchronous. Patients mainly incurred indolent LPD, particularly chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), while aggressive lymphomas and multiple myeloma were a relevant portion of the LPDs occurring in the follow-up of MPN. CLL was preferentially diagnosed in PV patients and was associated with a very high male-to-female ratio, as well as an older age at MPN diagnosis. On converse, multiple myeloma was rarely reported in PV patients and was preferentially diagnosed in female patients not harboring the JAK2 V617F mutation. Based on the 46 cases reporting follow-up data, median survival after MPN diagnosis was 96 months. This thorough review of published evidence confirms that LPD are relevant clinical events in the history of MPN patients. Controlled studies are needed to better refine individuals at higher risk of developing LPD, to support surveillance programs and to avoid therapies possibly favoring LPD.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Humans; Janus Kinase 2; Lymphoproliferative Disorders; Male; Middle Aged; Myeloproliferative Disorders; Neoplasms; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Thrombocythemia, Essential
PubMed: 29377227
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25049 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Feb 2017Splenic irradiation (SI) is a palliative treatment option for symptomatic splenomegaly (i.e. for pain, early satiety, pancytopenia from sequestration) secondary to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Splenic irradiation (SI) is a palliative treatment option for symptomatic splenomegaly (i.e. for pain, early satiety, pancytopenia from sequestration) secondary to hematologic malignancies and disorders. The purpose of the current article is to review the literature on SI for hematologic malignancies and disorders, including: (1) patient selection and optimal technique; (2) efficacy of SI; and (3) toxicities of SI. PICOS/PRISMA methods are used to select 27 articles including 766 courses of SI for 486 patients from 1960 to 2016. The most common cancers treated included chronic lymphocytic leukemia and myeloproliferative disorders; the most common regimen was 10Gy in 1Gy fractions over two weeks, and 27% of patients received retreatment. A partial or complete response (for symptoms, lab abnormalities) was obtained in 85-90% of treated patients, and 30% were retreated within 6-12months. There was no correlation between biologically equivalent dose of radiation therapy and response duration, pain relief, spleen reduction, or cytopenia improvement (r all <0.4); therefore, lower doses (e.g. 5Gy in 5 fractions) may be as effective as higher doses. Grade 3-4 toxicity (typically leukopenia, infection) was noted in 22% of courses, with grade 5 toxicity in 0.7% of courses. All grade 5 toxicities were due to either thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage or leukopenia with sepsis (or a combination of both); they were sequelae of cancer and not directly caused by SI. In summary, SI is generally a safe and efficacious method for treating patients with symptomatic splenomegaly.
Topics: Aged; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Radiotherapy; Spleen; Splenomegaly; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28063304
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.016