Did you mean: myositis ossificans
-
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders May 2024This review aims to study the clinical characteristics, diagnostic results, treatments, and outcomes in patients with heterotopic ossification following COVID-19...
BACKGROUND
This review aims to study the clinical characteristics, diagnostic results, treatments, and outcomes in patients with heterotopic ossification following COVID-19 infection.
METHODS
A literature search for eligible articles was conducted using MEDLINE/Pubmed, Global Health, and Scopus databases (January 12th, 2023), including all case reports and case series from any country and language. The criteria for inclusion in this review were cases of COVID-19 infection subsequently developing heterotopic ossification.
RESULTS
This systematic review analysed 15 reports (n = 20 patients) documenting cases of heterotopic ossification following COVID-19 infection. 80% of the patients were male, with a median age of 59 years. All patients required intensive care unit stay with an average duration of 48.5 days. Mechanical ventilation was necessary for all patients and 30% of them underwent tracheostomy. Common symptoms included stiffness and pain, most frequently affecting multiple locations (70%), with the hips and shoulders being predominantly involved. X-rays were the most commonly used imaging modality, followed by computed tomography. Although treatment was given, some of the patients continued to experience symptoms, particularly stiffness.
CONCLUSION
20 patients who developed heterotopic ossification after COVID-19 have been reported, the majority of which had at least two independent risk factors for this condition. The link between those two clinical entities is therefore uncertain, requiring further investigation. It is nonetheless important to suspect heterotopic ossification in patients with severe COVID-19 infection, prolonged immobilisation, mechanical ventilation, who develop joint pain and stiffness, as this condition can significantly impact patients' quality of life.
PROTOCOL REGISTRATION
CRD42023393516.
Topics: Humans; Ossification, Heterotopic; COVID-19; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Respiration, Artificial; Aged; SARS-CoV-2; Adult
PubMed: 38811925
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07537-4 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2023Circumscribed or pseudomalignant myositis ossificans (MO) is a rare and benign condition characterized by heterotopic bone formation in soft tissues. The clinical...
INTRODUCTION
Circumscribed or pseudomalignant myositis ossificans (MO) is a rare and benign condition characterized by heterotopic bone formation in soft tissues. The clinical presentation of MO, imaging investigations, histological findings, and treatment strategies are unclear, especially in the pediatric population.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar electronic databases to identify original articles and reviews in English or French of traumatic and non-traumatic MO. Studies were selected by 2 independent reviewers following the PRISMA recommendation and descriptive data were extracted. We harvest in each case the sex, age at diagnosis, location, presence of initial trauma, pre-emptive diagnosis, modalities of imagery used, realized biopsy, treatment performed, and type of follow-up.
RESULTS
Sixty pediatric cases of MO were identified between 2002 and 2023. Twenty-three patients (38.3%) were diagnosed with idiopathic/pseudomalignant and 37 patients (61.7%) with circumscribed. The mean age at diagnosis was 9.5 years (range 0.2-17 years), with a male-to-female ratio of 1:1. The initial pre-emptive diagnosis was neoplasia in 13 patients (21.7%). The biopsy was percutaneous in 9 patients (15%) and incisional in 7 patients (11.7%). Histological analysis was achieved in 35 cases (57%). Surgical excision was the first line treatment in 46.7% of patients, and non-surgical in the remaining patients. The follow-up strategy was clinical in 16 patients (26.7%) or based on imaging investigation in 23 patients (38.3%).
DISCUSSION
Although MO in children is described as a rare pathology, identifying the benignity of the condition is essential to avoid unnecessary invasive treatment and to avoid delaying the treatment of a potentially life-threatening entity. It seems that there is no consensus established concerning the proper imaging for diagnosis. Clinicians should acknowledge that the absence of a triggering trauma tends to direct the investigation and the management toward a surgical attitude. Conservative management is key, however, surgical excision can be proposed on matured lesions on a case-by-case basis. The absence of recurrence is not excluded. Therefore, a close clinical follow-up is suggested for all cases. The true benefit of a radiological is questioned in a question known to be self-resolving.
PubMed: 38161430
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1295212 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Mar 2023Progressive osseous heteroplasia (POH) is a rare genetic condition that causes progressive ossification. This usually results from an inactivating mutation of the...
BACKGROUND
Progressive osseous heteroplasia (POH) is a rare genetic condition that causes progressive ossification. This usually results from an inactivating mutation of the paternal GNAS gene. Herein, we report a case of POH caused by a novel mutation in exon 2 of the GNAS gene.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 5-year-old Chinese boy was referred to our hospital for a growing mass in his right foot. Although laboratory findings were normal, radiographic imaging revealed severe ossification in his right foot and smaller areas of intramuscular ossification in his arms and legs. A de novo mutation (c.175C > T, p.Q59X) in exon 2 of the GNAS gene was identified, prompting a diagnosis of POH. We conducted a systematic literature review to better understand this rare disease.
CONCLUSION
We have discovered that a de novo nonsense mutation in exon 2 of GNAS can lead to POH. Our literature review revealed that ankylosis of the extremities is the primary clinical outcome in patients with POH. Unlike other conditions such as fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), patients with POH do not experience respiratory failure. However, much remains to be learned about the relationship between the type of GNAS gene mutation and the resulting POH symptoms. Further research is needed to understand this complex and rare disease. This case adds to our current understanding of POH and will contribute to future studies and treatments.
Topics: Male; Humans; Child, Preschool; GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs; Rare Diseases; Ossification, Heterotopic; Myositis Ossificans; Exons; Mutation; Chromogranins
PubMed: 37003989
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06371-4 -
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral... Dec 2022Traumatic myositis ossificans is rare pathology affecting muscles/soft tissue. Its involvement in temporalis muscle is rarely reported in literature. The...
INTRODUCTION
Traumatic myositis ossificans is rare pathology affecting muscles/soft tissue. Its involvement in temporalis muscle is rarely reported in literature. The aetiopathogenesis is unknown, the diagnosis is based on clinco-radiological findings. Surgical management and follow-up are paramount.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A database search was done using Science Direct and PubMed search engines along with other published and unpublished literature. The final publications were tabulated using a custom made Performa. The available publications were subjected to appropriate statistical analysis. The data were recorded on excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Inc), and review was made using Review Manager (Rev Man) software for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 21 articles were considered for systemic review and meta-analysis. Forest plotting for demographics included the gender predilection/age of involvement. The data segregation was done with "temporalis involved" group and "other than temporalis involved" group. The study was free of homogeneity ( 2 = 0.26 I 2 = 5%) for gender and age. The overall analysis revealed that Temporalis muscle although rare to be affected shows greater propensity for involvement. This is supported by a lesser degree of heterogeneity ( 2 = 0.000) with a I 2 value of (The test showed a higher degree of significance for overall effect of muscle involvement ( = 2.33, = 0.02) (< 25%). The test showed a higher degree of significance for overall effect of muscle involvement ( = 2.33, = 0.02) (< = 0.05).Case reports.Two male cases with similar age predilection, reported after sustaining trauma. Both the cases presented with limited mouth opening and ultrasound was done for the first time to arrive at clinic-radiological diagnosis. The management was conservative with temporalis myotomy and coronidectomy.
CONCLUSION
Traumatic myositis ossificans presents as a rare disorder that poses a dilemma to the treating surgeon. The present article makes an attempt to critically analyse the pathology that is scantly reported in the literature.
PubMed: 36896048
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-022-01690-w -
Clinical Case Reports Mar 2022Temporomandibular joint ankyloses (TMJA) may manifest in patients with several predisposing systemic conditions. A case of extraarticular TMJA is presented in a patient...
Temporomandibular joint ankyloses (TMJA) may manifest in patients with several predisposing systemic conditions. A case of extraarticular TMJA is presented in a patient diagnosed with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive (FOP) is presented. The features, diagnosis, and management of TMJA superimposed on this condition are presented through a qualitative systematic review of literature.
PubMed: 35280078
DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5556 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare disease in which heterotopic ossification (HO) is formed in muscles, tendons and ligaments. Traumatic events,...
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare disease in which heterotopic ossification (HO) is formed in muscles, tendons and ligaments. Traumatic events, including surgery, are discouraged as this is known to trigger a flare-up with risk of subsequent HO. Anesthetic management for patients with FOP is challenging. Cervical spine fusion, ankylosis of the temporomandibular joints, thoracic insufficiency syndrome, restrictive chest wall disease, and sensitivity to oral trauma complicate airway management and anesthesia and pose life-threatening risks. We report a patient with FOP suffering from life-threatening antibiotic resistant bacterial infected ulcers of the right lower leg and foot. The anesthetic, surgical and postoperative challenges and considerations are discussed. In addition, the literature on limb surgeries of FOP patients is systemically reviewed. The 44 year-old female patient was scheduled for a through-knee amputation. Airway and pulmonary evaluation elicited severe abnormalities, rendering standard general anesthesia a rather complication-prone approach in this patient. Thus, regional anesthesia, supplemented with intravenous analgosedation and NO-inhalation were performed in this case. The surgery itself was securely planned to avoid any unnecessary tissue damage. Postoperatively the patient was closely monitored for FOP activity by ultrasound and [F]PET/CT-scan. One year after surgery, a non-significant amount of HO had formed at the operated site. The systematic review revealed seventeen articles in which thirty-two limb surgeries in FOP patients were described. HO reoccurrence was described in 90% of the cases. Clinical improvement due to improved mobility of the operated joint was noted in 16% of the cases. It should be noted, though, that follow-up time was limited and no or inadequate imaging modalities were used to follow-up in the majority of these cases. To conclude, if medically urgent, limb surgery in FOP is possible even when general anesthesia is not preferred. The procedure should be well-planned, alternative techniques or procedures should be tested prior to surgery and special attention should be paid to the correct positioning of the patient. According to the literature recurrent HO should be expected after surgery of a limb, even though it was limited in the case described.
Topics: Adult; Amputation, Surgical; Female; Humans; Leg; Myositis Ossificans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32973683
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00570 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020Bone biopsies have been obtained for many centuries and are one of the oldest known medical procedures in history. Despite the introduction of new noninvasive...
Bone biopsies have been obtained for many centuries and are one of the oldest known medical procedures in history. Despite the introduction of new noninvasive radiographic imaging techniques and genetic analyses, bone biopsies are still valuable in the diagnosis of bone diseases. Advanced techniques for the assessment of bone quality in bone biopsies, which have emerged during the last decades, allows in-depth tissue analyses beyond structural changes visible in bone histology. In this review, we give an overview of the application and advantages of the advanced techniques for the analysis of bone biopsies in the clinical setting of various rare metabolic bone diseases. A systematic literature search on rare metabolic bone diseases and analyzing techniques of bone biopsies was performed in PubMed up to 2019 week 34. Advanced techniques for the analysis of bone biopsies were described for rare metabolic bone disorders including Paget's disease of bone, osteogenesis imperfecta, fibrous dysplasia, Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva, X-linked osteoporosis, Loeys-Diets syndrome, osteopetrosis, Erdheim-Chester disease, and Cherubism. A variety of advanced available analytical techniques were identified that may help to provide additional detail on cellular, structural, and compositional characteristics in rare bone diseases complementing classical histopathology. To date, these techniques have only been used in research and not in daily clinical practice. Clinical application of bone quality assessment techniques depends upon several aspects such as availability of the technique in hospitals, the existence of reference data, and a cooperative network of researchers and clinicians. The evaluation of rare metabolic bone disorders requires a repertoire of different methods, owing to their distinct bone tissue characteristics. The broader use of bone material obtained from biopsies could provide much more information about pathophysiology or treatment options and establish bone biopsies as a valuable tool in rare metabolic bone diseases.
Topics: Biopsy; Bone Diseases; Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone; Humans; Loeys-Dietz Syndrome; Myositis Ossificans; Osteitis Deformans; Osteogenesis Imperfecta; Osteopetrosis; Osteoporosis; Rare Diseases
PubMed: 32714279
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00399 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an autosomal dominant disease, characterized by the formation of heterotopic ossification (HO) in muscles, ligaments, and...
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is an autosomal dominant disease, characterized by the formation of heterotopic ossification (HO) in muscles, ligaments, and tendons. Flare-ups, an inflammatory process that often precedes the formation of HO, can occur spontaneously, but trauma is also a common trigger. It is not known whether radiotherapy, especially in higher doses, might cause sufficient trauma or inflammation to trigger a flare-up and subsequent HO in FOP patients. We report the case of a patient undergoing radiotherapy for the treatment of a 1-cm-wide basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the lower lip. In addition, we present a systematic review of the available literature. Our patient received 54 Gy in 18 fractions with orthovoltage therapy, resulting in a clinical complete response of the tumor. Six months after treatment, there were no signs of HO either clinically or on [F]NaF PET/CT. The systematic review identified 11 publications describing either radiation treatment in FOP or radiation therapy as a cause of HO in non-FOP patients. Six case reports described the use of radiation in FOP patients for various reasons, including one with a high-dose treatment of a lip BCC using superficial X-ray therapy. The remaining five studies described the use of low-dose radiotherapy to prevent or treat either an FOP flare-up or HO formation. None of these cases showed worsening of disease that could be attributed to the use of radiation therapy. Radiation induced HO in non-FOP patients was rare and occurred in five studies. The largest of these studies suggested that HO was induced after treatment with high doses, resulting in more widespread evidence of tissue damage, potentially being the end result of this damage. In conclusion, available reports suggest no contraindication to radiotherapy in FOP patients; although the number of cases was small, systematic toxicity reports often were not available, and none of the reports described high-dose, high-energy radiation treatment at locations such as muscle and joint regions.
Topics: Aged; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Humans; Lip Neoplasms; Male; Myositis Ossificans; Ossification, Heterotopic; Radiation Injuries; Radiotherapy
PubMed: 32117050
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00006 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Nov 2014Radial head fracture is the most common fracture of the elbow. It usually results from a fall onto an outstretched arm. In 1954, Mason classified these fractures into... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Radial head fracture is the most common fracture of the elbow. It usually results from a fall onto an outstretched arm. In 1954, Mason classified these fractures into type 1 (undisplaced), type 2 (simple displaced), and type 3 (comminuted fractures). Aspiration of the elbow joint aims to relieve pressure in the elbow joint and has been used as an initial treatment option for radial head fractures. However, it is an invasive technique with the potential for complications such as infection and injury to nerves and vessels.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of elbow joint aspiration for treating radial head fracture in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (14 April 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (14 April 2014), MEDLINE (1946 to April Week 1 2014) and EMBASE (1980 to 2014 Week 15), trial registries, bibliographies and conference proceedings.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials comparing aspiration versus no aspiration for treating radial head fractures in adults.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently selected articles, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Where appropriate, we pooled results of comparable studies using fixed-effect meta-analysis.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two trials that involved 126 participants but provided results for only 108 participants. Most participants were adults, typically over 30 years of age. Both trials were at high risk of selection, performance, detection and reporting bias. Reflecting this high risk of bias, we downgraded the quality of evidence two levels for study limitations and a further level for imprecision. Thus we judged the evidence for all outcomes to be 'very low' quality, meaning that we are very uncertain about these estimates.One trial included participants with Mason type 1, 2 or 3 radial head fractures and also a few cases of traumatic elbow hemarthrosis without fracture. The other trial included participants with Mason type 1 and 2 fractures. All participants were managed non-surgically.Neither trial reported functional outcome based on validated patient-reported outcome measures of function or pain using validated measures such as a visual analogue scale. Very low quality evidence (108 participants, two trials) indicates little difference between aspiration and no aspiration in impaired function (unable to carry heavy loads; discomfort when carrying loads) at 12 months (9/51 in aspiration group versus 7/57 in the no aspiration group; risk ratio 1.43 favouring no aspiration, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 3.58). Very low quality evidence (two trials) suggests a beneficial effect of aspiration on pain relief immediately after aspiration. Very low quality evidence (one trial, 28 participants) shows less pain after aspiration at three weeks, but it is unclear whether this applies subsequently. Neither trial reported on adverse events (for example, nerve and vascular injuries; deep or superficial infection) from the procedure, but aspiration was reported as being unsuccessful in three participants (7.9%) in one trial. Very low quality evidence indicates little difference in range of motion (based on elbow extension) between the two groups at six weeks (28 participants, one trial) or 12 months (108 participants, two trials). The report of adverse events was incomplete, but one trial (80 participants) reported the absence of three specific complications: myositis ossificans, joint instability or late displacement of the fracture.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of joint aspiration for the initial treatment of radial head fracture in terms of function, pain and range of motion or to determine the safety of the procedure. An examination of current aspiration use, the prospective collection of adverse events and consultation with patients as to their preferences and values would be helpful in guiding decisions about the future design of a multicentre randomised trial aiming to obtain definitive evidence on the use of aspiration for treating radial head fractures.
Topics: Adult; Arthralgia; Drainage; Humans; Radius Fractures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome; Elbow Injuries
PubMed: 25416525
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009949.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2012Dislocation of the elbow joint is a relatively uncommon injury. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Dislocation of the elbow joint is a relatively uncommon injury.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of various forms of treatment for acute simple elbow dislocations in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (April 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, 2011 Issue 1), MEDLINE (1948 to March Week 5 2011), EMBASE (1980 to 2011 Week 14), PEDro (April 2011), CINAHL (April 2011), various trial registers, various conference proceedings and bibliographies of relevant articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of conservative and surgical treatment of dislocations of the elbow in adults. Excluded were trials involving dislocations with associated fractures, except for avulsion fractures.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias were independently performed by two review authors. There was no pooling of data.
MAIN RESULTS
Two small randomised controlled trials, involving a total of 80 participants with simple elbow dislocations, were included. Both trials were methodologically flawed and potentially biased.One trial, involving 50 participants, compared early mobilisation at three days post reduction versus cast immobilisation. At one year follow-up, the recovery of range of motion appeared better in the early mobilisation group (e.g. participants with incomplete recovery of extension: 1/24 versus 5/26; risk ratio 0.22, 95% confidence interval 0.03 to 1.72). However, the results were not statistically significant. There were no reports of instability or recurrence. One person in each group had residual pain at one year.The other trial, involving 30 participants, compared surgical repair of the torn ligaments versus conservative treatment (cast immobilisation for two weeks). At final follow-up (mean 27.5 months), there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the numbers of patients who considered their injured elbow to be inferior to their non-injured elbow (10/14 versus 7/14; RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.66) or in other patient complaints about their elbow such as weakness, pain or weather-related discomfort. There were no reports of instability or recurrence. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in range of motion of the elbow (extension, flexion, pronation, and supination) or grip strength at follow-up. No participants had neurological disturbances of the hand but two surgical group participants had recurrent dislocation of the ulnar nerve (no other details provided). One person in each group had radiologically detected myositis ossificans (bone formation within muscles following injury).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials to determine which method of treatment is the most appropriate for simple dislocations of the elbow in adults. Although weak and inconclusive, the available evidence from a trial comparing surgery versus conservative treatment does not suggest that the surgical repair of elbow ligaments for simple elbow dislocation improves long-term function. Future research should focus on questions relating to non-surgical treatment, such as the duration of immobilisation.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Casts, Surgical; Early Ambulation; Elbow Joint; Humans; Immobilization; Joint Dislocations; Ligaments, Articular; Manipulation, Orthopedic; Range of Motion, Articular; Treatment Outcome; Elbow Injuries
PubMed: 22513954
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007908.pub2