-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2015The Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group withdrew this review as of Issue 2, 2015 as the methodology was out of date and new trials have been published. The content... (Review)
Review
The Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group withdrew this review as of Issue 2, 2015 as the methodology was out of date and new trials have been published. The content partially overlaps with other reviews. The scope will be revised and this title will be replaced by a new protocol. The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.
Topics: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; Child; Exercise Therapy; Gait Disorders, Neurologic; Humans; Male; Muscle Weakness; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Myotonic Dystrophy; Resistance Training; Treatment Outcome; Walking
PubMed: 25927103
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003908.pub4 -
Neuroepidemiology 2014Determining the prevalence of neuromuscular disorders for the general population is important to identify the scope of burden on society and enable comparisons with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Determining the prevalence of neuromuscular disorders for the general population is important to identify the scope of burden on society and enable comparisons with other health conditions. This systematic review aims to identify and collate the findings of studies published between 1960 and 2013 on the prevalence of all types of muscular dystrophies.
SUMMARY
Relevant articles were identified through electronic database searches and manual searches of reference lists. There were 38 articles from across 19 countries that met the inclusion criteria. The total combined prevalence for all muscular dystrophies for studies classified as having a low risk of bias ranged between 19.8 and 25.1 per 100,000 person-years. Myotonic dystrophy (0.5-18.1 per 100,000), Duchenne muscular dystrophy (1.7-4.2) and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (3.2-4.6 per 100,000) were found to be the most common types of disorder. There was wide variation in study methodology, case ascertainment, and verification procedures and populations studied, all of which may contribute to the wide prevalence range, in addition to the likely variation in prevalence by country. Key Messages: Greater consistency in the conduct and reporting of neuroepidemiological studies is urgently needed to enable comparisons to be made between studies, countries, and over time.
Topics: Bias; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Muscular Dystrophies; Prevalence
PubMed: 25532075
DOI: 10.1159/000369343 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2014Chronic alveolar hypoventilation is a common complication of many neuromuscular and chest wall disorders. Long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation is commonly used to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic alveolar hypoventilation is a common complication of many neuromuscular and chest wall disorders. Long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation is commonly used to treat it. This is a 2014 update of a review first published in 2000 and previously updated in 2007.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the effects on mortality of nocturnal mechanical ventilation in people with neuromuscular or chest wall disorders. Subsidiary endpoints were to examine the effects of respiratory assistance on improvement of chronic hypoventilation, sleep quality, hospital admissions and quality of life.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE on 10 June 2014. We contacted authors of identified trials and other experts in the field.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We searched for quasi-randomised or randomised controlled trials of participants of all ages with neuromuscular or chest wall disorder-related stable chronic hypoventilation of all degrees of severity, receiving any type and any mode of long-term nocturnal mechanical ventilation. The primary outcome measure was one-year mortality and secondary outcomes were unplanned hospital admission, short-term and long-term reversal of hypoventilation-related clinical symptoms and daytime hypercapnia, improvement of lung function and sleep breathing disorders.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methodology to select studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias in included studies.
MAIN RESULTS
The 10 eligible trials included a total of 173 participants. Roughly half of the trials were at low risk of selection, attrition or reporting bias, and almost all were at high risk of performance and detection bias. Four trials reported mortality data in the long term. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of dying was 0.62 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.91, P value = 0.01) in favour of nocturnal mechanical ventilation compared to spontaneous breathing. There was considerable and significant heterogeneity between the trials, possibly related to differences between the study populations. Information on unplanned hospitalisation was available from two studies. The corresponding pooled RR was 0.25 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.82, P value = 0.02) in favour of nocturnal mechanical ventilation. For most of the outcome measures there was no significant long-term difference between nocturnal mechanical ventilation and no ventilation. Most of the secondary outcomes were not assessed in the eligible trials. Three out of the 10 trials, accounting for 39 participants, two with a cross-over design and one with two parallel groups, compared volume- and pressure-cycled non-invasive mechanical ventilation in the short term. From the only trial (16 participants) on parallel groups, there was no difference in mortality (one death in each arm) between volume- and pressure-cycled mechanical ventilation. Data from the two cross-over trials suggested that compared with pressure-cycled ventilation, volume-cycled ventilation was associated with less sleep time spent with an arterial oxygen saturation below 90% (mean difference (MD) 6.83 minutes, 95% CI 4.68 to 8.98, P value = 0.00001) and a lower apnoea-hypopnoea (per sleep hour) index (MD -0.65, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.46, P value = 0.00001). We found no study that compared invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation or intermittent positive pressure versus negative pressure ventilation.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Current evidence about the therapeutic benefit of mechanical ventilation is of very low quality, but is consistent, suggesting alleviation of the symptoms of chronic hypoventilation in the short term. In four small studies, survival was prolonged and unplanned hospitalisation was reduced, mainly in participants with motor neuron diseases. With the exception of motor neuron disease and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, for which the natural history supports the survival benefit of mechanical ventilation against no ventilation, further larger randomised trials should assess the long-term benefit of different types and modes of nocturnal mechanical ventilation on quality of life, morbidity and mortality, and its cost-benefit ratio in neuromuscular and chest wall diseases.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Hypoventilation; Motor Neuron Disease; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Neuromuscular Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiration, Artificial; Sleep; Thoracic Wall; Time Factors
PubMed: 25503955
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001941.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2013Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people with a muscle disease. This is an update of a review first published in 2004.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the safety and efficacy of strength training and aerobic exercise training in people with a muscle disease.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (July 2012), CENTRAL (2012 Issue 3 of 4), MEDLINE (January 1946 to July 2012), EMBASE (January 1974 to July 2012), EMBASE Classic (1947 to 1973) and CINAHL (January 1982 to July 2012).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing strength training or aerobic exercise programmes, or both, to no training, and lasting at least six weeks, in people with a well-described diagnosis of a muscle disease.We did not use the reporting of specific outcomes as a study selection criterion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data obtained from the full text-articles and from the original investigators. We collected adverse event data from included studies.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five trials (170 participants). The first trial compared the effect of strength training versus no training in 36 people with myotonic dystrophy. The second trial compared aerobic exercise training versus no training in 14 people with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. The third trial compared strength training versus no training in a factorial trial that also compared albuterol with placebo, in 65 people with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). The fourth trial compared combined strength training and aerobic exercise versus no training in 18 people with mitochondrial myopathy. The fifth trial compared combined strength training and aerobic exercise versus no training in 35 people with myotonic dystrophy type 1.In both myotonic dystrophy trials and the dermatomyositis and polymyositis trial there were no significant differences between training and non-training groups for primary and secondary outcome measures. The risk of bias of the strength training trial in myotonic dystrophy and the aerobic exercise trial in polymyositis and dermatomyositis was judged as uncertain, and for the combined strength training and aerobic exercise trial, the risk of bias was judged as adequate. In the FSHD trial, for which the risk of bias was judged as adequate, a +1.17 kg difference (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18 to 2.16) in dynamic strength of elbow flexors in favour of the training group reached statistical significance. In the mitochondrial myopathy trial, there were no significant differences in dynamic strength measures between training and non-training groups. Exercise duration and distance cycled in a submaximal endurance test increased significantly in the training group compared to the control group. The differences in mean time and mean distance cycled till exhaustion between groups were 23.70 min (95% CI 2.63 to 44.77) and 9.70 km (95% CI 1.51 to 17.89), respectively. The risk of bias was judged as uncertain. In all trials, no adverse events were reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Moderate-intensity strength training in myotonic dystrophy and FSHD and aerobic exercise training in dermatomyositis and polymyositis and myotonic dystrophy type I appear to do no harm, but there is insufficient evidence to conclude that they offer benefit. In mitochondrial myopathy, aerobic exercise combined with strength training appears to be safe and may be effective in increasing submaximal endurance capacity. Limitations in the design of studies in other muscle diseases prevent more general conclusions in these disorders.
Topics: Dermatomyositis; Exercise; Humans; Mitochondrial Myopathies; Muscular Diseases; Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral; Myotonic Dystrophy; Physical Fitness; Polymyositis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Resistance Training
PubMed: 23835682
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003907.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2013Progressive muscle weakness is a main symptom of most hereditary and acquired muscle diseases. Creatine improves muscle performance in healthy individuals. This is an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Progressive muscle weakness is a main symptom of most hereditary and acquired muscle diseases. Creatine improves muscle performance in healthy individuals. This is an update of our 2007 Cochrane review that evaluated creatine treatment in muscle disorders. Previous updates were in 2009 and 2011.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the efficacy of creatine compared to placebo for the treatment of muscle weakness in muscle diseases.
SEARCH METHODS
On 11 September 2012, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (2012, Issue 9 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2012) and EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2012) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of creatine used to treat muscle diseases.
SELECTION CRITERIA
RCTs or quasi-RCTs of creatine treatment compared to placebo in hereditary muscle diseases or idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently applied the selection criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted data. We obtained missing data from investigators.
MAIN RESULTS
A total of 14 trials, including 364 randomised participants, met the selection criteria. The risk of bias was low in most studies. Only one trial had a high risk of selection, performance and detection bias. No new studies were identified at this update.Meta-analysis of six trials in muscular dystrophies including 192 participants revealed a significant increase in muscle strength in the creatine group compared to placebo, with a mean difference of 8.47%; (95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.55 to 13.38). Pooled data of four trials including 115 participants showed that a significantly higher number of participants felt better during creatine treatment compared to placebo with a risk ratio of 4.51 (95% CI 2.33 to 8.74). One trial in 37 participants with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies also showed a significant improvement in functional performance. No trial reported any clinically relevant adverse event.In metabolic myopathies, meta-analyses of three cross-over trials including 33 participants revealed no significant difference in muscle strength. One trial reported a significant deterioration of activities of daily living (mean difference 0.54 on a 1 to 10 scale; 95% CI 0.14 to 0.93) and an increase in muscle pain during high-dose creatine treatment in McArdle disease.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
High quality evidence from RCTs shows that short- and medium-term creatine treatment increases muscle strength in muscular dystrophies. There is also evidence that creatine improves functional performance in muscular dystrophy and idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Creatine is well tolerated in these people. High quality but limited evidence from RCTs does not show significant improvement in muscle strength in metabolic myopathies. High-dose creatine treatment impaired activities of daily living and increased muscle pain in McArdle disease.
Topics: Creatine; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Muscle Contraction; Muscle Strength; Muscular Diseases; Muscular Dystrophies; Myositis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 23740606
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004760.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2010Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Strength training or aerobic exercise programmes might optimise muscle and cardiorespiratory function and prevent additional disuse atrophy and deconditioning in people with a muscle disease.
OBJECTIVES
To examine the safety and efficacy of strength training and aerobic exercise training in people with a muscle disease.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Specialized Register (July 2009), the Cochrane Rehabilitation and Related Therapies Field Register (October 2002, August 2008 and July 2009), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2009) MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2009), EMBASE (January 1974 to July 2009), EMBASE Classic (1947 to 1973) and CINAHL (January 1982 to July 2009).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing strength training or aerobic exercise programmes, or both, to no training, and lasting at least 10 weeks.For strength training Primary outcome: static or dynamic muscle strength. Secondary: muscle endurance or muscle fatigue, functional assessments, quality of life, muscle membrane permeability, pain and experienced fatigue.For aerobic exercise training Primary outcome: aerobic capacity expressed as work capacity. Secondary: aerobic capacity (oxygen consumption, parameters of cardiac or respiratory function), functional assessments, quality of life, muscle membrane permeability, pain and experienced fatigue.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted the data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included three trials (121 participants). The first compared the effect of strength training versus no training in 36 people with myotonic dystrophy. The second trial compared strength training versus no training, both combined with albuterol or placebo, in 65 people with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. The third trial compared combined strength training and aerobic exercise versus no training in 18 people with mitochondrial myopathy. In the myotonic dystrophy trial there were no significant differences between training and non-training groups for primary and secondary outcome measures. In the facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy trial only a +1.17 kg difference (95% confidence interval 0.18 to 2.16) in dynamic strength of elbow flexors in favour of the training group reached statistical significance. In the mitochondrial myopathy trial there were no significant differences in dynamic strength measures between training and non-training groups. Exercise duration and distance cycled in a submaximal endurance test increased significantly in the training group compared to the control group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
In myotonic dystrophy and facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, moderate-intensity strength training appears not to do harm but there is insufficient evidence to conclude that it offers benefit. In mitochondrial myopathy, aerobic exercise combined with strength training appears to be safe and may be effective in increasing submaximal endurance capacity. Limitations in the design of studies in other muscle diseases prevent more general conclusions in these disorders.
Topics: Exercise; Humans; Mitochondrial Myopathies; Muscular Dystrophy, Facioscapulohumeral; Myotonic Dystrophy; Physical Fitness; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 20091552
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003907.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2007"Foot drop" or "Floppy foot drop" is the term commonly used to describe weakness or contracture of the muscles around the ankle joint. It may arise from many... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
"Foot drop" or "Floppy foot drop" is the term commonly used to describe weakness or contracture of the muscles around the ankle joint. It may arise from many neuromuscular diseases.
OBJECTIVES
To conduct a systematic review of randomised trials of treatment for footdrop resulting from neuromuscular disease.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (July 2005), MEDLINE (January 1966 to July 2005), EMBASE (January 1980 to July 2005), AMED (January 1985 to July 2005) and CINAHL databases (January 1982 to July 2005).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of physical, orthotic and surgical treatments for footdrop resulting from lower motor neuron or muscle disease and related contractures were included. People with primary joint disease were excluded. Interventions included a 'wait and see' approach, physiotherapy, orthotics, surgery and pharmacological therapy. The primary outcome measure was ability to walk whilst secondary outcome measures included dorsiflexor torque and strength, measures of 'activity' and 'participation' and adverse effects.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Methodological quality was evaluated by two authors using the van Tulder criteria. Three studies with altogether 139 participants were included in the review. Heterogeneity of the studies precluded pooling the data.
MAIN RESULTS
Early surgery did not significantly affect walking speed in a trial including 20 children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. After one year, the mean difference (MD) of the 28 feet walking time was 0.00 seconds (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.83 to 0.83) and the MD of the 150 feet walking time was -2.88 seconds, (95% CI -8.18 to 2.42). In a trial with altogether 26 participants with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy), long-term strength training significantly increased walking speed on a 6 metre timed walk (MD -0.70 seconds, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.23) but not on a 50 metre timed walk (MD -1.9 seconds, 95% CI -4.09 to 0.29). In a trial of a 24-week strength training programme in 28 participants with myotonic dystrophy, there was no significant change in walking speed on either a 6 or 50 metre walk.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Using the primary outcome of ability to walk, only one study demonstrated a positive effect and that was an exercise programme for people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Surgery was not significantly effective in children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. More evidence generated by methodologically sound trials is required.
Topics: Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease; Child; Exercise Therapy; Gait Disorders, Neurologic; Humans; Male; Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne; Treatment Outcome; Walking
PubMed: 17443532
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003908.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2006Excessive daytime sleepiness is a common symptom of myotonic dystrophy. Psychostimulants are drugs increasingly used to treat hypersomnia in myotonic dystrophy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Excessive daytime sleepiness is a common symptom of myotonic dystrophy. Psychostimulants are drugs increasingly used to treat hypersomnia in myotonic dystrophy.
OBJECTIVES
To search systematically for, and combine all evidence from, randomised trials relating to the effects of psychostimulants in myotonic dystrophy patients with hypersomnia.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Trials Register (January 2006), MEDLINE (from January 1966 to January 2006) and EMBASE (from January 1980 to January 2006) for randomised trials concerning psychostimulants in myotonic dystrophy, checked the bibliographies of identified papers and made enquiries of the authors of the papers. The search for relevant studies was updated in January 2006.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered all randomised or quasi randomised trials that have evaluated any type of psychostimulants (versus a placebo or no treatment) in children or adults with proven myotonic dystrophy and hypersomnia.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Potentially relevant papers were scrutinised by two authors and the selection of eligible studies was agreed by them and a third author. Data were extracted by one author and checked by a second author.
MAIN RESULTS
Primary outcome. One trial using a modified maintenance of wakefulness test showed an improvement by 5.70 (95% confidence intervals 0.1 to 11.3) minutes more in the modafinil than the control group. Secondary outcomes. In a double-blind crossover study of 10 participants with myotonic dystrophy, there was no difference between the selegiline and placebo periods in mean improvement in the multiple sleep latency test. Two trials, involving 60 participants in total, evaluated the efficacy and safety of modafinil in adults with myotonic dystrophy-related daytime sleepiness. The weighted mean difference on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was -1.59 (95% confidence intervals, -2.77 to -0.42) in favour of modafinil.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence to support the routine use of psychostimulants to treat hypersomnia in myotonic dystrophy. There is some evidence from two studies that modafinil may improve daytime sleepiness. More randomised trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of psychostimulants.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Humans; Modafinil; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors; Myotonic Dystrophy; Psychotropic Drugs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Selegiline
PubMed: 16855999
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003218.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2006Abnormal delayed relaxation of skeletal muscles, known as myotonia, can cause disability in myotonic disorders. Sodium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressive drugs,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Abnormal delayed relaxation of skeletal muscles, known as myotonia, can cause disability in myotonic disorders. Sodium channel blockers, tricyclic antidepressive drugs, benzodiazepines, calcium-antagonists, taurine and prednisone may be of use in reducing myotonia.
OBJECTIVES
To consider the evidence from randomised controlled trials on the efficacy and tolerability of drug treatment in patients with clinical myotonia due to a myotonic disorder.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register (April 2004), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 2003) and EMBASE (January 1980 to December 2003). Grey literature was handsearched and reference lists of identified studies and reviews were examined. Authors, disease experts and manufacturers of anti-myotonic drugs were contacted.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We considered all (quasi) randomised trials of participants with myotonia treated with any drug treatment versus no therapy, placebo or any other active drug treatment. The primary outcome measure was:reduced clinical myotonia using two categories: (1) no residual myotonia or improvement of myotonia or (2) No change or worsening of myotonia. Secondary outcome measures were:(1) clinical relaxation time; (2) electromyographic relaxation time; (3) stair test; (4) presence of percussion myotonia; and (5) proportion of adverse events.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors extracted the data independently onto standardised extraction forms and disagreements were resolved by discussion.
MAIN RESULTS
Nine randomised controlled trials were found comparing active drug treatment versus placebo or another active drug treatment in patients with myotonia due to a myotonic disorder. Included trials were double-blind or single-blind crossover studies involving a total of 137 patients of which 109 had myotonic dystrophy type 1 and 28 had myotonia congenita. The studies were of poor quality. Therefore, we were not able to analyse the results of all identified studies. Two small crossover studies without a washout period demonstrated a significant effect of imipramine and taurine in myotonic dystrophy. One small crossover study with a washout period demonstrated a significant effect of clomipramine in myotonic dystrophy. Meta-analysis was not possible.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Due to insufficient good quality data and lack of randomised studies, it is impossible to determine whether drug treatment is safe and effective in the treatment of myotonia. Small single studies give an indication that clomipramine and imipramine have a short-term beneficial effect and that taurine has a long-term beneficial effect on myotonia. Larger, well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of drug treatment for myotonia.
Topics: Humans; Myotonia; Myotonic Dystrophy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 16437496
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004762.pub2