-
BMC Cancer Jun 2024Novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) drugs present a promising anti-cancer treatment, although survival benefits for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) remain... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Novel antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) drugs present a promising anti-cancer treatment, although survival benefits for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BC) remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the comparative effect of ADCs and other anti-HER2 therapy on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for treatment of HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC.
METHODS
Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from five databases. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for RCTs by RevMan5.4 software. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted to evaluate the benefit of ADCs on PFS and OS in HER2-positive advanced BC by meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis of six RCTs with 3870 patients revealed that ADCs significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.80, P = 0.0002) and OS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72-0.86, P < 0.0001) of patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC. Subgroup analysis showed that PFS and OS were obviously prolonged for patients who previously received HER2-targeted therapy. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias suggested that the results were stable and reliable.
CONCLUSION
Statistically significant benefits for PFS and OS were observed with ADCs in HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic BC, especially for those who received prior anti-HER2 treatment.
Topics: Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Receptor, ErbB-2; Female; Immunoconjugates; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Progression-Free Survival; Treatment Outcome; Trastuzumab; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
PubMed: 38851684
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12478-1 -
Heliyon Jun 2024FBXW7 is a tumour suppressor gene that functions as E3-ubiquitin-ligase, targeting numerous oncoproteins for degradation, i.e., Cyclin-E, c-Myc, and Notch. FBXW7...
UNLABELLED
FBXW7 is a tumour suppressor gene that functions as E3-ubiquitin-ligase, targeting numerous oncoproteins for degradation, i.e., Cyclin-E, c-Myc, and Notch. FBXW7 performs a pivotal role in regulating cell cycle progression. FBXW7 mutation is frequently implicated in various cancers.
METHODOLOGY
A systematic review and meta-analysis done on several studies using "Preferred Reporting Items for Systemmatic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)" criteria and registered with PROSPERO (registration-number-CRD42023388845). The preliminary search comprises 1182 articles; however, 58 studies were subsequently chosen after eliminating non-eligible studies. To explore the prevalence of FBXW7 mutation among colorectal cancer patients, data were analysed using "OpenMeta Analyst and comprehensive meta-analysis-3.0 (CMA-3.0)" software.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis involves 13,974 respondents; most were males 7825/13,974, (56.0 %). Overall prevalence of FBXW7 mutations was 10.3 %, (95%CI: 8.6-12.4), I2 = 90.5 %, (P < 0.001). The occurrence of FBXW7 mutations was highest in Russia [19.0 %, (95%CI: 9.8-33.7)] and Taiwan [18.8 %, (95%CI: 8.7-35.9)], P-values< 0.05 while the least prevalence was reported in Netherland (4 %) and Italy (5 %), both P-values< 0.001. Overall prevalence of FBXW7 abberation was greatest amongst male gender: "53.9 %, (95%CI: 8.3-62.0 %)", Tumour location (colon): 59.8 %, (95%CI: 53.9-65), tumour site (left): 61.6 %, (95%CI: 53.8-68.9), Tumour-grade (Moderate): 65.9 %, (95%CI: 54.9-75.4 %), and Tumour late-stage: 67.9 %, (95%CI: 49.7-84.3 %), all P-values< 0.001. When stratified according to study-period, an increasing trend was noted from 2018 till present with the highest mutation rate recorded in 2022 (15.3 %).
CONCLUSION
Overall prevalence of FBXW7 mutations was 10.3 % with male gender, left side, and late-stage being most mutated, and these outcomes conform with severally published articles on FBXW7 mutation.
PubMed: 38845996
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31471 -
PloS One 2024Breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment rely heavily on molecular markers such as HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER. Currently, these markers are identified by invasive methods. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer (BC) diagnosis and treatment rely heavily on molecular markers such as HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER. Currently, these markers are identified by invasive methods.
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis investigates the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based radiomics as a novel approach to predicting these markers.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies evaluating ultrasound-based radiomics in BC. Inclusion criteria encompassed research on HER2, Ki67, PR, and ER as key molecular markers. Quality assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) and Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was performed. The data extraction step was performed systematically.
RESULTS
Our meta-analysis quantifies the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound-based radiomics with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.78 for predicting HER2, 0.80, and 0.76 for Ki67 biomarkers. Studies did not provide sufficient data for quantitative PR and ER prediction analysis. The overall quality of studies based on the RQS tool was moderate. The QUADAS-2 evaluation showed that the studies had an unclear risk of bias regarding the flow and timing domain.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis indicated that AI models have a promising accuracy for predicting key molecular biomarkers' status in BC patients. We performed the quantitative analysis for HER2 and Ki67 biomarkers which yielded a moderate to high accuracy. However, studies did not provide adequate data for meta-analysis of ER and PR prediction accuracy of developed models. The overall quality of the studies was acceptable. In future research, studies need to report the results thoroughly. Also, we suggest more prospective studies from different centers.
Topics: Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Biomarkers, Tumor; Artificial Intelligence; Receptor, ErbB-2; Ki-67 Antigen; Ultrasonography; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone
PubMed: 38820391
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303669 -
Revista Peruana de Medicina... May 2024Motivation for the study. Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer were evaluated, focusing on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) compared... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE.
Motivation for the study. Treatment options for HER2-positive breast cancer were evaluated, focusing on the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) compared to other anti-HER2 therapies. Main findings. Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap emerged as promising alternatives, showing substantial improvements in progression-free survival for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. T-DM1 showed superior efficacy to the other treatments. Implications. Our findings could inform healthcare decision-making processes to optimize strategies for HER2-positive breast cancer, and potentially improve health outcomes and quality of life. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) versus other anti-HER2 therapies in HER2+ breast cancer (BC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS.
We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Our study focused on patients undergoing treatment for unresectable locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or metastatic breast cancer (mBC), which included regimens involving trastuzumab and taxanes. Additionally, we considered cases within the first 6 months of treatment for HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC).
RESULTS.
A total of 23 RCTs and 41 reports were included in our analysis. LABC and mBC showed no statistically significant difference in any of the comparisons of T-DM1 versus the other anti-HER2+ therapies. When assessing progression-free survival (PFS), trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and PyroCap demonstrated greater efficacy compared to other treatments (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 3.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.75-4.63 and HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.35-2.44; respectively), while T-DM1 alone exhibited superior effectiveness compared to LapCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.77), TrasCap (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46-0.91), LapCapCitu (HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.33-1.10), Nera (HR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39-0.77), and Cap (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.28-0.49).
CONCLUSIONS.
NMA allows a ranking based on the comparative efficacy and safety among the interventions available. Although superior to other schemes, T-DM1 showed a lower efficacy performance in PFS and overall response rate and a trend towards worse overall survival than T-DXd.
Topics: Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine; Female; Receptor, ErbB-2; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Trastuzumab; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Neoplasm Metastasis; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Maytansine
PubMed: 38808848
DOI: 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.411.13351 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024Microsatellite Instability (MSI-H) occurs in approximately 15% of non-metastatic colon cancers, influencing patient outcomes positively compared to microsatellite stable... (Review)
Review
Microsatellite Instability (MSI-H) occurs in approximately 15% of non-metastatic colon cancers, influencing patient outcomes positively compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) cancers. This systematic review focuses on the prognostic significance of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations within MSI-H colon cancer. Through comprehensive searches in databases like MEDLINE, EMBASE, and others until 1 January 2024, we selected 8 pertinent studies from an initial pool of 1918. These studies, encompassing nine trials and five observational studies involving 13,273 patients, provided insights into disease-free survival (DFS), survival after recurrence, and overall survival. The pooled data suggest that while KRAS and BRAF mutations typically predict poorer outcomes in MSS colorectal cancer, their impact is less pronounced in MSI contexts, with implications varying across different stages of cancer and treatment responses. In particular, adverse effects of these mutations manifest significantly upon recurrence rather than affecting immediate DFS. Our findings confirm the complex interplay between genetic mutations and MSI status, emphasizing the nuanced role of MSI in modifying the prognostic implications of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in colon cancer. This review underscores the importance of considering MSI alongside mutational status in the clinical decision-making process, aiming to tailor therapeutic strategies more effectively for colon cancer patients.
PubMed: 38786299
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101001 -
BMC Cancer May 2024Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)...
BACKGROUND
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are currently recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guidelines as the first-line (1 L) treatment for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (HR+/HER2- LABC/mBC). Although there are many treatment options, there is no clear standard of care for patients following 1 L CDK4/6i. Understanding the real-world effectiveness of subsequent therapies may help to identify an unmet need in this patient population. This systematic literature review qualitatively synthesized effectiveness and safety outcomes for treatments received in the real-world setting after 1 L CDK4/6i therapy in patients with HR+/ HER2- LABC/mBC.
METHODS
MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the Ovid® platform for real-world evidence studies published between 2015 and 2022. Grey literature was searched to identify relevant conference abstracts published from 2019 to 2022. The review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023383914). Data were qualitatively synthesized and weighted average median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was calculated for NCCN/ESMO-recommended post-1 L CDK4/6i treatment regimens.
RESULTS
Twenty records (9 full-text articles and 11 conference abstracts) encompassing 18 unique studies met the eligibility criteria and reported outcomes for second-line (2 L) treatments after 1 L CDK4/6i; no studies reported disaggregated outcomes in the third-line setting or beyond. Sixteen studies included NCCN/ESMO guideline-recommended treatments with the majority evaluating endocrine-based therapy; five studies on single-agent ET, six studies on mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) ± ET, and three studies with a mix of ET and/or mTORi. Chemotherapy outcomes were reported in 11 studies. The most assessed outcome was median rwPFS; the weighted average median rwPFS was calculated as 3.9 months (3.3-6.0 months) for single-agent ET, 3.6 months (2.5-4.9 months) for mTORi ± ET, 3.7 months for a mix of ET and/or mTORi (3.0-4.0 months), and 6.1 months (3.7-9.7 months) for chemotherapy. Very few studies reported other effectiveness outcomes and only two studies reported safety outcomes. Most studies had heterogeneity in patient- and disease-related characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS
The real-world effectiveness of current 2 L treatments post-1 L CDK4/6i are suboptimal, highlighting an unmet need for this patient population.
Topics: Humans; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Breast Neoplasms; Receptor, ErbB-2; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6; Female; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone; Progression-Free Survival
PubMed: 38783218
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12269-8 -
Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Jun 2024Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety of crizotinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ROS1 gene fusion: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence.
BACKGROUND
Crizotinib was approved to treat patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) with ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) gene fusion in 2016. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify real-world evidence (RWE) studies and estimated the efficacy and safety of crizotinib using meta-analyses (MA) for objective response rate (ORR), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE®, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from January 2016 to March 2023 using Ovid® for published single-arm or comparative RWE studies evaluating patients (N ≥ 20) receiving crizotinib monotherapy for aNSCLC with ROS1 gene fusion. Pooled estimates for ORR and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were derived using the metafor package in R while pooled estimates for median real-world PFS (rwPFS) and OS were derived using reconstructed individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier curves. The primary analysis included all studies regardless of crizotinib line of therapy; a subgroup analysis (SA) was conducted using studies evaluating patients receiving first-line crizotinib.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were considered feasible for MA. For the primary analysis, the pooled ORR (N = 9 studies) was 70.6 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 57.0, 81.3), median rwPFS was 14.5 months (N = 11 studies), and OS was 40.2 months (N = 9 studies). In the SA, the pooled ORR (N = 4 studies) was 81.1 % (95 % CI: 76.1, 85.2) and the median rwPFS (N = 4 studies) and OS (N = 2 studies) were 18.1 and 60 months, respectively. All MAs were associated with significant heterogeneity (I > 25 %). Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 18.7 % of patients (pooled estimate).
CONCLUSION
The results from this study are consistent with clinical trial data and, taken collectively, supports crizotinib as a safe and effective treatment across different lines of therapy in patients with ROS1 aNSCLC in the real-world setting.
Topics: Crizotinib; Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion; Treatment Outcome; Antineoplastic Agents; Gene Fusion
PubMed: 38749072
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107816 -
Radiotherapy and Oncology : Journal of... Jul 2024We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the performance of ML in detecting genetic mutation status in NSCLC patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the performance of ML in detecting genetic mutation status in NSCLC patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science up until July 2023. We discussed the genetic mutation status of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, and BRAF, as well as the mutation status at different sites of EGFR.
RESULTS
We included a total of 128 original studies, of which 114 constructed ML models based on radiomic features mainly extracted from CT, MRI, and PET-CT data. From a genetic mutation perspective, 121 studies focused on EGFR mutation status analysis. In the validation set, for the detection of EGFR mutation status, the aggregated c-index was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.706-0.814) for clinical feature-based models, 0.772 (95%CI: 0.753-0.791) for CT-based radiomics models, 0.816 (95%CI: 0.776-0.856) for MRI-based radiomics models, and 0.750 (95%CI: 0.712-0.789) for PET-CT-based radiomics models. When combined with clinical features, the aggregated c-index was 0.807 (95%CI: 0.781-0.832) for CT-based radiomics models, 0.806 (95%CI: 0.773-0.839) for MRI-based radiomics models, and 0.822 (95%CI: 0.789-0.854) for PET-CT-based radiomics models. In the validation set, the aggregated c-indexes for radiomics-based models to detect mutation status of ALK and KRAS, as well as the mutation status at different sites of EGFR were all greater than 0.7.
CONCLUSION
The use of radiomics-based methods for early discrimination of EGFR mutation status in NSCLC demonstrates relatively high accuracy. However, the influence of clinical variables cannot be overlooked in this process. In addition, future studies should also pay attention to the accuracy of radiomics in identifying mutation status of other genes in EGFR.
Topics: Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Machine Learning; Mutation; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; ErbB Receptors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)
PubMed: 38734145
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110325 -
Annals of Hematology Jun 2024Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation is present in most patients with polycythemia vera (PV). One persistently puzzling aspect unresolved is the association between... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation is present in most patients with polycythemia vera (PV). One persistently puzzling aspect unresolved is the association between JAK2V617F allele burden (also known as variant allele frequency) and the relevant clinical characteristics. Numerous studies have reported associations between allele burden and both hematologic and clinical features. While there are strong indications linking high allele burden in PV patients with symptoms and clinical characteristics, not all associations are definitive, and disparate and contradictory findings have been reported. Hence, this study aimed to synthesize existing data from the literature to better understand the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and relevant clinical correlates. Out of the 1,851 studies identified, 39 studies provided evidence related to the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and clinical correlates, and 21 studies were included in meta-analyses. Meta-analyses of correlation demonstrated that leucocyte and erythrocyte counts were significantly and positively correlated with JAK2V617F allele burden, whereas platelet count was not. Meta-analyses of standardized mean difference demonstrated that leucocyte and hematocrit were significantly higher in patients with higher JAK2V617F allele burden, whereas platelet count was significantly lower. Meta-analyses of odds ratio demonstrated that patients who had higher JAK2V617F allele burden had a significantly greater odds ratio for developing pruritus, splenomegaly, thrombosis, myelofibrosis, and acute myeloid leukemia. Our study integrates data from approximately 5,462 patients, contributing insights into the association between JAK2V617F allele burden and various hematological parameters, symptomatic manifestations, and complications. However, varied methods of data presentation and statistical analyses prevented the execution of high-quality meta-analyses.
Topics: Polycythemia Vera; Janus Kinase 2; Humans; Alleles; Gene Frequency; Amino Acid Substitution; Mutation, Missense
PubMed: 38652240
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-024-05754-4 -
Clinical Breast Cancer Jul 2024Poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) is approved for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutation. In recent years, many studies have explored the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) is approved for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutation. In recent years, many studies have explored the application of PARPi in neoadjuvant therapy, but failed to reach a unified conclusion. PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and key oncological meetings for trials were searched for studies reporting neoadjuvant regimens with PARPi in HER2-negative breast cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR), residual cancer burden (RCB), breast-conservation surgery rate (BCSR), clinical response, and adverse events were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis using the Mantel Haenszel random/fixed effects model. Subgroup analyses of pCR were conducted according to BRCA1/2 status, and hormone receptor (HR) status. Five studies (N = 1223) were included, the addition of PARPi to neoadjuvant regimens significantly increased pCR rates (HR 1.45, 95%CI 1.09-1.92, P = .01, I = 86%). In subgroup analysis, the addition of PARPi increased the pCR rate both in HR-positive (n = 383) and HR-negative (n = 431) subgroups, which showed a dominant effect of PARPi regardless of HR status (HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.33-3.23, P = .001, I = 0%; HR 1.85, 95%CI 1.39-2.26, P < .0001, I = 0%, respectively). However, when we performed a subgroup analysis based on the status of BRCA1/2, no further benefit for PARPi was found. Adverse reactions were generally tolerable. Other outcome indexes, including RCB, clinical response, BCSR, and PARPi did not show a clinical benefit. Regardless of BRCA1/2 status, PARPi in neoadjuvant therapy, can improve the pCR rate of HER2-negative breast cancer, especially in HR-positive patients. Thus, we should have performed larger randomized trials and provided a stronger evidence-based basis.
Topics: Female; Humans; BRCA1 Protein; BRCA2 Protein; Breast Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors; Receptor, ErbB-2; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38580572
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.02.020